Trained for ADSL2+, does this look about right

I got migrated from ADSLmax over to ADSL2+ about 10 days ago, and since then the line has been training. Please could someone look at the stats below and tell me if this looks about right?
I changed from a HH1.5 to HH2.0. I was hoping to get about 19MBit/s, based on the fairly low attenuation, but it appears to have settled on 14.5MBit/s. I have left the router switched on without interruption for about 1 week now. It drops and reconnects about once per day, which I assume is normal during training. The noise margin seems to have settled on about 6dB, which I believe is fairly normal as well.
Any thoughts?
I suspect that this is probably as good as it gets for me, but would appreciate someone knowledgeable checking for me, thanks
ADSL line status
Connection information
Line state
Connected
Connection time
1 day, 16:36:51
Downstream
14,378 Kbps
Upstream
1,217 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.5
Latency type
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up)
8.8 dB / 5.5 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
21.0 dB / 8.1 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
0.0 dBm / 13.1 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
84
Loss of Signal (Local)
171
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
102242 / 4294967264
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
705 / 2147480000
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
nil / 0
Error Seconds (Local)
1288

I would expect the noise margin to fall to 6db or maybe less on a good line and increase conenction speed to about 19mb again assuming good line with no noise problems - just leave it conencted and it should reduce given a bit more time
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Similar Messages

Does this look sort of right?

How do I create an object called myBook that would call the constructor that requires 3 arguments?
Does this look sort of right in terms of making a conscructor?
//Constructor
setTitle(newTitleFloat);
setUnit(newUnitFloat);
setQuantity(new(QuantityFloat);
calculateInterest();

It's hard to know what you need w/out more information. But as a for instance, If I had a class with the following fields:
class MyBook
    private String title = "";
    private double unit = 0.0;
    private int quantity = 0;
    private double interest = 0.0;
}Then a possible constructor could be:
    public MyBook(String title, double unit, int quantity)
        this.title = title;
        this.unit = unit;
        this.quantity = quantity;
        calculateInterest();
    }Assuming of course that the class also has a method called calculateInterest().
It could be called like so:
    public static void main(String[] args)
        MyBook myBook = new MyBook("Tale of Two Skivies", 3.55, 5);
    }ps: please learn to use code tags. It makes your code much more readable.

Shooting "squeezed" 16:9 does not look quite right when exported to 16:9

Hard to put a title which would cover the problem well, probably hard to describe it well, too, for an amateur:)
Anyway, I have a cheap JVC GR-D320E which serves me well as a beginner´s camera (for the price I gave) but when I shoot in what it calls 16:9 mode which I have understood it is not true 16:9 but in a way squeezed, and I import this to FCE (set to Anamorphic PAL), it all looks good within FCE but when I export it using QT Conversions and setting the proportions and size manually to what is supposed to be the right dimensions for 16:9 PAL (1024x576 if I remember it correctly) it does not look right. The persons "grow shorter and fatter", if you know what I mean.
I have tried to change the dimensions in QT Pro, but the problem is to find the correct ones. I also wonder why this happens and if there actually are "correct" proportions which then would be something between 16:9 and 4:3 or if I am doing something wrong?
When I export not using QT Conversions, the result is 4:3 which isn´t right, either...
Well, hope I have been able to describe this in a way which is possible to understand...

I want to export it for several purposes; all you mention, in fact; to put on the web, to play on the monitor and to make a DVD. As I mentioned, when I exported as a QuickTime movie, it came out as a 4:3 and that of course, looked awful.
Using the conversions, I can scale it as I want to, but to me 16:9 does not look exactly right, either. That is why I wanted to know if there are some proportions in between the 4:3 and 16:9 which is appropriate for footage which is not filmed in true 16:9 but in this option which cheaper cameras have.
The article you linked to, did not tell anything new, alas.

Help me...does this look good?!?!?

Hey all,
I want a G4 to use in my music studio, have found one on ebay, does this look good to you...
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=8792713494&rd=1&sspagename= STRK%3AMEWA%3AIT&rd=1
If you can't access that, basically it's this...
Computer is in excellent condition, has been well loved and well upgraded:- 200GB hard disk (5400rpm) Dual 867 MHz, 1MB L3 cache per processor 1.25GB DDR SDRAM 16x DVD+/- RW (Superdrive) 4x DVD+ RW (original Superdrive) 4x USB 2.0 ports 2x USB 1.0 ports 2x Firewire ports Airport Card (WiFi) Ethernet Card 56kbps Modem Digital in/out for audio Again it is in excellent condition, well loved.
Oh and there is still 2 slots left for memory upgrade and 4 other slots for your other upgrades, i.e. more firewire, usb, graphics card, music adaptors etc. I used the machine mostly for video editing and graphic design and it handles everything I throw at it. It is a beast of a computer but sadly by job entails I have a laptop now I will also include all the software that comes with it.
Think it sounds good? What price do you reckon???
Thank you!
Olivia x
G4 I hope

If you do decide to bid I'd keep in mind that it's the base model MDD G4 with a 133MHz system bus (the others had 167MHz). It's also one of the original models that got the nickname of wind tunnel as they could be fairly noisy, so much so that Apple under went a power supply replacement program using quieter fans, which may be an issue if it's intended for audio use. I'm not sure whether it's had the power supply replaced, but Verax also offered a noise reduction kit, which may give some indication of how noisy it can be.
I'm not trying to put you off though, but I'd keep the above in mind if you do intend to place a bid.

Does this look right? (see photo)

look at the connection piece for the power charger. The two end parts (and other places) are black. Does this mean I need to go to the Apple store to get this replaced somehow?
in the past, I have experienced burning myself when I touched the charger...
it currently smells really weird. it has a smell of metal (but stronger) along with the smell of something rotting.
the computer has trouble charging. The charger itself works on my mom's Macbook2008, but not on mine. It works only about 33% of the time, and it is becoming annoying. Even when it is charging, one touch to the charger and I need to spend at least 5 min trying to get it charging again.
This is a early2011 MBP. Are there similar problems out there on other MBP's of the same type?

I would take that computer to an Apple Store or reseller to get it diagnosed just because of security, and it's dangerous to have the MagSafe in that status, more when you have problems charging the MacBook

Does this look right ??? Memory usage screen shot ..

Seems like Adium is taking a ton of memory ..I'm getting my other gig tomrrow so I guess its nothing to worry about but, Im just a wierdo when it comes to system process's.
[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v326/devin22cbr/Picture1-7.png[/IMG]
heh ..guess html doesnt work on here.

Does this make you feel better about Adium?
http://www3.telus.net/redpoint/tc/tmp/Picture%201.png
I have seen safari go up to as much as 300+ MBs and iTunes hit around 200+ MBs.
That is completely normal, don't worry about it. As you can see mine is quite lower, but it will eventually rise after extended use.

New PC - does this look suitable?

I'm looking to replace an old PC with a custom build:
- i7-3770 3.4GHz
- H77 chipset
- 16GB DDR-1600 RAM
- 3TB HDD
- 256GB SSD
- DVD Writer
- On board graphics only
- RaidMax Super Hurricane case
- 500W PSU
- Win8 or 7 64 bit
- Card Reader
I will continue to use a 30" (2560*1600) monitor.
Does this spec look suitable for Lightroom / PSE and some basic video editing in Premiere Elements with plenty of headroom (I assume LR5 will gobble even more resources than LR4!!)?

I would look seriously at a Xeon Quad processor instead of the i7 even if the Xeon had only 2.8 Ghz or 3 Ghz.
Processor speed is not everything; you also need to look at workload, i.e. throughput.
Don't be taken in for a "gamer's PC" - a gamer needs speed above all but the games have a relatively "thin" data stream.
16 GB of RAM seems almost overkill; I have 12 GB and run Lr and Photoshop (+ a bunch of other programs) at the same time with no problems.
I would replace the 3 TB drive with 3 drives @ 500 GB each. Keep in mind that with Lr that constantly reads and writes to and from the HD, the read-and write cycles build up. If you have only one internal HD it has to do all the read-and-write cycles and that can slow down your system, i.e. your RAM and processor have to wait for the drive to spin and do its reading and writing.
But if you have 3 internal drives you are able to distribute the read-and-write cycles on 3 drives simultaneously.
I'm not sure about your onboard graphics. When I looked into the specs of my new computer (now about 9 months old) I found that onboard graphics alone would not be optimal.
Again, i think it's good enough for browsing the web and gaming. But photo editing, particularly if you have a camera with a full-frame sensor, i.e. large Raw-files, it's a different matter.
I would not go with onboard graphics alone - my personal opinion. But then again, you can try it out, and - if there's a slot for it - get a graphics card later.

Does This look like the new,larger iPad coming?

This picture is right off of the Apple website.
Is this the new, larger iPad that is coming next from Apple that everyone keeps writing about?

I have had some time to look at this, it could be either the cover/screen for a MacBook/Pro/Air.
It's kinda hard to tell, but if this was a larger iPad, I think the Apple Logo on the back should be turned 90 degrees clockwise?

"Optimising Photos for iPod" Does this affect photos in iPhoto Library?

Hi,
I have a question regarding syncing pictures which are stored in my iPhoto library with my iPod touch.
I notice when I sync photos I get a message that iTunes is "optimising photos for iPod"
1) Does this mean that 'quality' of the photos is reduced/compressed?
If so, does this mean that any picture downloaded onto my iPod, it's quality is reduced within iPhoto app.
or
2) The original quality of the photo is unchanged within iPhoto and it's only the synced photo which is 'optimised' for the sync process?
I hope this makes sense!
Thanks...........

Hi Dave,
Don't worry, iTunes only mangles, er I mean "optimises" the photos on your Touch.
The originals will stay intact on your computer, if you look in the photo file you sync with there should be another file called "iPod Photo Cache" where the marmalised ones are stored.
Dud.
ps. any photo, regardless of size gets butchered to a max of 640x480 and file size approx 650kb.
Message was edited by: Duddo

PKGBUILD - does this look right

My PKGBUILD simply needs to copy files from a zip file to /usr/share/java/Jalbum/skins/BananAlbum. Here is what I have so far and it seems to work just fine. Is there a more elegant way to do it?
pkgname=bananalbum
pkgver=6.1.4
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="Very elegant and sexy flash based JAlbum skin."
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url="http://www.bananalbum.com"
license=("freeware")
depends=('jalbum')
source=("BananAlbum_v6.1.4.zip::http://jalbum.net/web/GetSkinFile?versionId=1253&type=zip")
#source=(http://jalbum.net/web/GetSkinFile?versionId=1253&type=zip)
md5sums=('dd4d860769db0da6f16aa5b13fd41772')
build() {
install -dm755 $pkgdir/usr/share/java/Jalbum/skins/BananAlbum
cp -r $srcdir/BananAlbum_v$pkgver/* $pkgdir/usr/share/java/Jalbum/skins/BananAlbum
Last edited by graysky (2009-05-27 05:58:37)

@Devoid - Actually, I was wrong about the 644... if I look at the other skin directories they are all 755 so what I have works just fine. Is there a strong reason not to use the cp command?
Last edited by graysky (2009-05-27 06:12:01)

Does this look right?

Traceroute to bbc.co.uk (212.58.251.195), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
www.asusnetwork.net (192.168.1.1) 1.196 ms 0.516 ms 0.423 ms
217.32.143.34 (217.32.143.34) 4.508 ms 4.201 ms 4.296 ms
217.32.143.62 (217.32.143.62) 259.41 ms 4.191 ms 5.048 ms
213.120.163.50 (213.120.163.50) 6.259 ms 5.742 ms 5.883 ms
31.55.165.229 (31.55.165.229) 6.204 ms 6.693 ms 6.043 ms
31.55.165.109 (31.55.165.109) 6.811 ms 5.993 ms 6.093 ms
acc2-10GigE-0-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net (109.159.250.194) 6.085 ms 33.314 ms 6.037 ms
109.159.250.145 (109.159.250.145) 23.305 ms 18.755 ms 16.091 ms
peer2-xe11-1-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.254.118) 44.401 ms 14.017 ms 13.801 ms
194.74.65.42 (194.74.65.42) 13.392 ms 13.495 ms 13.792 ms
ae0.er01.telhc.bbc.co.uk (132.185.254.109) 13.743 ms 15.735 ms 13.817 ms
132.185.255.140 (132.185.255.140) 15.445 ms 15.302 ms 18.589 ms
Internet is normally rock solid @ 75 / 17
Tonight it feels sluggish...

Looks fine to me, how long has your modem an router been connected for? Sometime's a build up of errors on both can cause slower download speeds.
Just a simple re-boot on both or either or should fix the problem.
Is it slow wirelessly or wired?
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution

Does this looks Normal Usage?

I just bought iphone 4s, and a bit confused about the timing of its battery. Can some one please tell me is this usage time is normal for iphone 4s?
Thanks.

There is no such thing as "normal" because no two people use their devices exactly the same.
That being said, do you have issues with battery life? Does the device make it through a full day on a single charge?
Personally I've never understood the fascination with, nor cared what the usage stats show. I never look at them. If I can make it through a full day on a single charge, that's "normal" for me. If I cannot... something odd is occurring, typically a rogue app in the background.

What does this look like?

Today when I turned on my MBP it seems that near the top right there is a darker crescent shaped area. I don't remember having this until today, though I have been using my laptop in clamshell mode for a while.
Not sure why this is happening because when I view it from different angles I do not see this, only when it's straight on.
Any idea on what the issue could be and, or how to fix it?
I've attached an image I took for it.
http://att.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=116483&stc=1&thumb=1&d=1211 213253

here's one from the lab with two drives but without the HDD fan:http://www.flickr.com/photos/lenovophotolibrary/1905031644/sizes/o/in/set-72157602984914274/
cedric posted a small photo here showing the S10 with two fans:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2170/2514334675_db0957ea22_o.jpg
and another image i found here on desktopreview.com:
http://www.desktopreview.com/shared/picture.asp?f=124
unless your drives are running hot or significantly above average, i wouldn't worry about it. but, if you still want one then it can be ordered through IBM parts here or by calling 800-388-7080 (options 2:1:1) for $32.94 plus tax and shipping.
ThinkStation C20
ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

Does this speed seem right?

Hello! I've just joined BT Infinity after previously being with TalkTalk FTTC. Got fed up with their poor customer service and finally switched.
During my time with TT, there was an initial line fault and the speed was around 11Mbps. It was fixed after an engineer visit and I saw my speed rock solid at around 21 for a couple of months, before going down to 9 with another line fault. It was traced to somewhere between the cabinet and home again (not on the premises) and after it was fixed, the speed reverted to about 14 where it's stayed fairly constant. The switch to BT happened on 1/3 (no engineer visit), and the speed has been consistent over the three weeks since I joined at around 15.
I'd probably have thought nothing more, but just found out chatting to the bloke next door who's also with BT Infinity that he gets 25. Seems a big difference - same house, same build, wires come from same hole in the ground, same distance from the cabinet, and nearer the 21 I got at one time....
Currently using HH3, wifi switched off, Mac connected direct with Cat 5e cable to GigE slot.
Does it sound like I have a problem, and if so, I'd be grateful for any advice please. Appreciate any help - and thanks in advance.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Here we go:
1. Best Effort Test: -provides background information.
Download Speed
14.92 Mbps
0 Mbps
15.27 Mbps
Max Achievable Speed
Download speedachieved during the test was - 14.92 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speedsis 12 Mbps-15.27 Mbps .
Additional Information:
IP Profile for your line is - 15.27 Mbps
2. Upstream Test: -provides background information.
Upload Speed
1.9 Mbps
0 Mbps
10 Mbps
Max Achievable Speed
Upload speed achieved during the test was - 1.9Mbps
Additional Information:
Upstream Rate IP profile on your line is - 10 Mbps
We were unable to identify any performance problem with your service at this time.
It is possible that any problem you are currently, or had previously experienced may have been caused by traffic congestion on the Internet or by the server you were accessing responding slowly.
If you continue to encounter a problem with a specific server, please contact the administrator of that server in the first instance.

Adding Ram How Does This Look

I was thinking about getting 2 of these
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820134046
for a total of 4 1 gig chips. Specs look fine and I can't see any reason why this would not be ok in my Mac Pro dual xeon but maybe I'm wrong? Thanks.

Yuck
Mo' better and cheaper to boot, 2GB FB-Dimm's from OWC:
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/53FB2MPK04GB/

Trained for ADSL2+, does this look about right

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for