Transfer control Strategy

Hello all,
What is relevenece of using transfer control in costing variant
why we use it.
suggest

Hi prem
It is for partial costing. The purpose of partial costing is to prevent the system from creating a new cost estimate for a material when costing data already exists. Instead, the existing costing data is simply transferred into the new cost estimate. This improves performance.
You can create at TCode OKKM
Cheers
Srinivas

Similar Messages

Transfer control in Costing Run

Hi ,
I was trying costing a material in ck40n using standard costing variant.Here if I don't specify any
Transfer control, I am able to cost the material multiple times. How ever if I use a specific transfer control,
The material is nor getting selected for costing run.Is there any specific reason for the same.
Please highlight.
Regards
Rudra

Hi
The purpose of Transfer Control is to transfer the existing Cost Estimates... It cant prevent the selection of a material for costing
In Transfer Control - You can choose Single Plant / Cross Plant strategy.... based on that, the existing cost estimates are either Transferred or not transferred
br, Ajay M

How SAP use transfer control or material cost estimate

Hello!
I have strategy "3-Previous standard cost estimate" in transfer control material cost estimate.
I have cost estimate for product AAA with status KA and costing date from 01.01.2014.
Product AAA produced from component BBB.
Component BBB has two cost estimates with costing date from 01.01.2014 and 01.02.2014.
I run cost estimate for product AAA with costing date from 06.03.2014.
Cost estimate not use existing cost estimate for component and create new cost estimate.
In help.sap.com contains next information about transfer strategy 3 - The system searches for existing previous cost estimate.
why my system does not use the existing cost estimate for component?
Thanks for attention.

Thanks, Szymon!
I use russian interface and read russian help. Where stragegy 3 has name "Прошедшая плановая калькуляция" which means "The last planned cost estimate".
This led me astray.
In english help i read next:
Previous standard cost estimates
The system searches for an existing previous standard cost estimate.
You are completely right!
two more questions:
- We can not use strategy 3 if we not realesed cost estimate as standard price?
- What strategy we should use for transfer material cost estimate with status KA?
Thanks

How to transfer control along with Data to the another page (Out of JVM)

Hi,
Please bear with me, incase this turns out to be a dumb question.
I want to transfer control to a non JSP page after I hit submit. Apart from
this I am also sending some data as a HTTPS POST. In case of using
response.sendRedirect(), it doesn't take care of the POST data.
So, can anybody help me with what's the best practice in sending POST
request from a Struts (1.3.8) based J2EE application to another page (which is not a J2EE Application)
Thank you

Hi,
you should run two different import comand.
The first import with only metadata, just to recreate the structure.
With the second import you will import data only for the tables you need.
I think this is the simplier solution.
Acr

OKTZ what is Transfer Control use for?

Hello all:
can anybody explain in very easy meaning what is this apply for?
Best Regards,
Manthana

Hi
Transfer control is a tool to customise the way SAP has handle cost estimates. With Tcode OKKM you can do the customising. Press F1 to look at what SAPhas to say to it: "Key that determines, for each plant, how the system is to search for existing cost estimates."
Re: Error Message CK 170 and CK 171
Hope this will help you.
Regards
Edited by: Dublin on Nov 16, 2009 9:19 PM

Transfer Control in CK40N

Dear all,
i trying to update the standard cost of a material and those components that are in its multi-level BOM.
Scenario:
Material     Level      Std Cost
A                  1            $0
|
B                  2            $1
|
C                  3            $0
Material A has 3 levels in its multilevel BOM. I trying to update the std cost of material A and C without updating cost of B and std cost of B was previoulsy updated by CK24.
I tried to use transfer Control in CK40N but transfer Control once recongise that its BOM has a std cost won't procced on to the next . Is it possible whereby i can updates cost of those selected materials and their multilevel BOM that do not have a cost estimate?
Regards
YM

Dear Yiming,
While executing CK11N only single level BOM explosion will be happening and the system calculates
the cost.
If you execute CK40N for the same product then the system considers multi level BOM and calculates
the Sub-assemblies standard cost also, provided if they dont have any standard cost estimate for that
current period.
If you execute CK11N,then for marking and release you have to use CK24 for marking and release.
In CK40N cost estimae ,marking and release can be carried out in steps.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Liquid transfer control/monitoring using valves, pumps, & sensors

Hi there,
My project is writing a labview program to control & monitor the transfer of a liquid from a tanker truck to a 70-tonne storage tank, and from the storage tank to multiple 3-tonne railroad tankers. We will be using a NI controller (I don't remember the name of it right now) to control this system. The piping network for this transfer process consists of several remote control valves, 1 flow meter, 2 pumps (centrifugal & diaphragm), level sensors, & load cells. The labview program needs to:
1. control the flow of liquid (i.e. start/stop transfer, open/close valves & activate/deactivate pumps when certain setpoints are reached)
2. monitor the inventory of liquid in the tanker truck, storage tank, & railroad tanker (flow meter will indicate the flow rate, level senors will be in both tankers to indicate levels, and storage tank has a load cell which can be used to indicate the inventory of liquid iside the tank)
The transfer is split into 2 phases: tanker truck to storage tank & storage tank to railroad tanker. Both are separate processes (i.e. they do not occur simultaneously). So my labview program needs to be able to switch between these two processes.
I am relatively new to using labview, and this is a pretty tall order. I was just wondering if anyone had any advice on how I could set the program up? Or possibly lead me to some example programs I could look at to help me out.
I appreciate any feedback.
Thanks,
Daryn

Daryn,
You are right that "this is a pretty tall order" for a LabVIEW beginner. However, if you are patient and do not try to do too mcuh too quickly, you should be able to get it working.
First, I recommend that you get some LV training to make sure that you are sound on the fundamentals before you do mcuh on this project. Fumbling around making novice errors could become a big problem for a project like this.
Next, break the problem down into "bite-sized" chunks. You will need to be able to read from the sensors. Write to controllers. Perform logical decision-making. Display data to the operators. Probably log information to files. Certainly handle error conditions. LabVIEW makes it easy to keep things modular by using subVIs.
Also, carefully design the program before you write much code. Your system will probably include a state machine. Document the states, what happens in each state, and the conditions for transition to other states. (Do not forget error conditions and "that will never happen" possibilites). This state design document will make writing the program much easier.
Then look at the examples which come with LV. There are examples for data acquistion, for control, for state machines, and for other relevant parts of the code. The examples most likely will not be directly useful in your final program but will save you lots of time in learning how to do some of these essential parts of your project.
Lynn

Bin to bin transfer control

Dear All,
User request to restrict some bin to bin stock transfer between some specific storage types.
ex. 320 --> 321 allowed
302 --> 320 disallowed.
Is there anybody knows how to make this control in configuration ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Corey

Dears,
I've tried enhancements MWMTO001 and MWMTO003 but not work.
Is there anyone know which enhancement I should set up?
Regards
Corey

Transfer Control

Hi,
I have a function that inserts a blob column into the database. I am using that in the WHEN_BUTTON_PRESSED form trigger. The problem is that the control goes to the function and then it ends there, due to this the next part of trigger code is not being run. Here is the trigger and function code.
declare
file_name varchar2(30) := name_in('FILE_NAME');
get varchar2(20);
begin
get := blob1(file_name);
/*THIS PART NOR BEING DISPLAYED*/
message('This is the filename '||file_name);
message(' ');
end;
create or replace function blob1(file_name varchar)
return varchar
as
a blob;
loc bfile := bfilename('D1','''||file_name||''');
begin
insert into das.pictures values(empty_blob())
returning photo into a;
/*opening the location to load the file*/ dbms_lob.fileopen(loc);
/*loading into the blob variable which inturns
loads into the table*/
dbms_lob.loadfromfile(a,loc,dbms_lob.getlength(loc));
/*closing the location*/
dbms_lob.fileclose(loc);
return 'TRUE';
end;
Can anyone tell me how to transfer the control back to the form? Also is there a way to attach a screen shot in this forum?

I know this will seem really silly...but
loc bfile := bfilename('D1','''||file_name||'''); - Text Literal error
loc bfile := bfilename('D1',file_name); - Running fine
Thanks for your time guys

Inter company stock transfer control issue

Hello All,
In inter company Stock Transfer process, plant A has received scheduling agreement or PO from plant B. Is there any possibility of receiving material by plant B w/o sending / dispatching material by plant A? I guess this should not be possible.. but in our case it is happening. Being document type is of ZUB (which is similar process as intra company process).. also we have implemented WM. Material issuance or receipt will happen from outbound or inbound process.
Though there is a process violation but system would have restricted user not to receive materials. Can someone let me know is there any configuration issue ? If yes how to fix the issue? If no how to restrict user?
Edited by: Krish9 on Aug 13, 2011 10:03 PM

Hi,
As per your scenario you described, it is rather unclear what you are trying to achieve there.
How would the stock posting be balanced if we do not relief materials from Plant A if we are receiving it in Plant B?
The stock have to come from somewhere in order for Plant B to receive it. The same quantity of stock has to be reduced accordingly from the source plant (be it Plant A or some other plants).
I reckon if you just merely do not want to reflect that the stock is being dispatched from Plant A to Plant B, then you may want to consider using a dummy plant to represent Plant A or something to that effect.
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.

Transfer control back to calling program from infotype screen

i've developed a module pool program that uses 'call transaction pa30'BDC to an custom infotype screen... after the 'save' button is pressed the control goes to the infotypes initial screen.
but i want the control to come back to the calling module pool program.. how do i do that??

Hi Joseph,
have you considered using function module HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION with parameter DIALOG_MODE = '2' instead of CALL TRANSACTION?
Regards,
Christian.

Unable to transfer control from one action to another action

In my jsp i ve one html link, in that <html:link action=" " ></html:link>
i ve given the respection path. with the same name i specified in the
struts-config.xml file also.
When i am pressing that html link, i am unable to get the respective
jsp page.
What i need to do ? pls help me in this area.
Advance thanks.
with regards,
chandu

You will need to phyically copy the file from your one pc to the other. Then drag it into iTunes (drop it on the rigntone menu).
Then try to play it in iTunes (it will ask to enter login info to authorize it).
Then from there it is on that machine ready to go.
I belive the location it saved the file is
C:\Documents and Settings\YourLoginName\My Documents\My Music\iTunes\Ringtones
I would put it in the same location (editing login name part of the path of course) before dragging it into iTunes.
Message was edited by: DaVBMan

Sales order costing - MTO Scenario

Hi Experts,
I am working on SAP ECC 6.0 on a Make-to-order scenario.
I have created sales otder; run MRP for the sales order and converted the planned order to Production order and confirmed the production order.
But I don't know the period end processes of make to order scenario. Please answer my following queries:
Whether <b>WIP</b> will be calculated at Sales order level or individual production order level related to this sales order?
Whether <b>variances</b> are to be calculated at each production order level or at sale order level?
Which t-code should be used for calculation of variances if it is calaculated at sales order level? The production orders have TECO status.
Whether variances are to be settled at sales order level or each production order level?
Which Transfer Control should I use in Costong Variant "Sales Order KDN" or "Complete Transfer"?
Please also forward me some documents, if you have, which explains the whole step by step cycle from creation of sales order to settlement of sales order.
My email id is [email protected]
Request your help.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Bijay Kumar Deo

Hi Bijay
To add few more checks and points - please note the following
1) Whether WIP will be calculated at Sales order level or individual production order level related to this sales order?
A) You need to selected RA for sales order in WIP RA version to ensure WIP is calculated for production orders which are linked to sales order
2) Whether variances are to be calculated at each production order level or at sale order level?
A) This would depend on whether u r following valuated or Non Valuated sales order stocks / costing
If is is non valuated u cannot determine variances, actual costs of production order are settled to sales order item
If it is valuated sales order following sales order costing, you can transfer production varainces to sales order item
3) Create settlement profile having sales order as valid receiver and assign profile to production type created for the sales order - MTO scenario
4) Which Transfer Control should I use in Costong Variant "Sales Order KDN" or "Complete Transfer"?
4A) Suggested to have complete transfer as transfer control strategy
Hope the above clarifies. Please assign points if useful as a way to say thanks
Any more suggestions / corrections to above points for the above scenairo are appreciated from forum members

How to combine Session Facade and Transfer object?

Hello All!
I'm working on an enterprise application. Presentation layer is a stand alone client, business logic is build on the Glassfish v2.1 and MySQL is used as a database. The client is connection to the GlassFishj server remotely using EJBs.
I have problems with business logic architecture.
Here is the brief description of backend application architecture design:
1. Session Facade pattern is used to simplify the client and application server interface and to provide application layers between backend (http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/SessionFacade.html).
2.Transfer Object pattern to define update transfer objects strategy in order to decrease network overhead during client and application server interactions and to provide version control for objects. Transfer objects are designed as simple java business serializable objects. (http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/TransferObject.html)
3. Originally the backend application consisted of three modules: users, storage and orders, but at the end I have decided to divide my application into the following parts - assortments, map, menu, orders, transactions, users.
4. All MySQL database transactions are via JDBC using procedures. No use of entity beans.
Questions:
1. I have some doubts about using Session Facade and Transfer object patterns at the same time. At first I'd mike to cite the definitions of the patters from the SUN official web site.
* Use a session bean as a facade to encapsulate the complexity of interactions between the business objects participating in a workflow. The Session Facade manages the business objects, and provides a uniform coarse-grained service access layer to clients.
* Use a Transfer Object to encapsulate the business data. A single method call is used to send and retrieve the Transfer Object. When the client requests the enterprise bean for the business data, the enterprise bean can construct the Transfer Object, populate it with its attribute values, and pass it by value to the client.
* So, if I use Transfer Object along with Session Facade, it makes some difficulties with object version control, because I 2 or
3 transfer objects controls with the 1 bean class. The best option for Transfer object Pattern is that each transfer object should have its own bean class to provide ability of object's version control. In the case it can bring the network overhead because of frequent remote calls caused by the large number of the bean classes.
* So, should I use the both patterns? If yes, how to manage the interaction the patterns. If no, which one to use.
2. E.g. I have a huge list of the Order objects and each Order object consists of other complicated objects. So, would I have trouble to transfer that list over network? If yes, how to manage it.
Thank you!
Astghik

Astghik wrote:
Hello All!
I'm working on an enterprise application. Presentation layer is a stand alone client, business logic is build on the Glassfish v2.1 and MySQL is used as a database. The client is connection to the GlassFishj server remotely using EJBs.
I have problems with business logic architecture.
Here is the brief description of backend application architecture design:
1. Session Facade pattern is used to simplify the client and application server interface and to provide application layers between backend (http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/SessionFacade.html).
I would simply recommend establishing a service tier. Your services should be stateless. You can go the extra mile and have a session facade, but in the majority of cases, coding to an interface for your service accomplishes the same goals.
2.Transfer Object pattern to define update transfer objects strategy in order to decrease network overhead during client and application server interactions and to provide version control for objects. Transfer objects are designed as simple java business serializable objects. (http://java.sun.com/blueprints/corej2eepatterns/Patterns/TransferObject.html)
The idea of the transfer object is very similar to the Command pattern. I think if you investigate that pattern, it will be more obvious. The transfer object reduces network latency by consolidating all the parameters into an object, ideally, this also consolidates multiple method calls. If you combine a transfer object (or command object) with a service tier, you get the best of both worlds. The service can delegate calls to helper objects (or other services or components) using the data in the transfer / command object.
3. Originally the backend application consisted of three modules: users, storage and orders, but at the end I have decided to divide my application into the following parts - assortments, map, menu, orders, transactions, users.
The is your domain. It will vary from application to application. The principles above are more general (e.g., patterns and architectural tiers) and should apply to most domains. However, your actual use case may require something different.
4. All MySQL database transactions are via JDBC using procedures. No use of entity beans.
Consider using something like iBatis or Spring's JDBC templating to make your life easier with JDBC.
Questions:
1. I have some doubts about using Session Facade and Transfer object patterns at the same time. At first I'd mike to cite the definitions of the patters from the SUN official web site.
* Use a session bean as a facade to encapsulate the complexity of interactions between the business objects participating in a workflow. The Session Facade manages the business objects, and provides a uniform coarse-grained service access layer to clients.
* Use a Transfer Object to encapsulate the business data. A single method call is used to send and retrieve the Transfer Object. When the client requests the enterprise bean for the business data, the enterprise bean can construct the Transfer Object, populate it with its attribute values, and pass it by value to the client.
* So, if I use Transfer Object along with Session Facade, it makes some difficulties with object version control, because I 2 or
3 transfer objects controls with the 1 bean class. The best option for Transfer object Pattern is that each transfer object should have its own bean class to provide ability of object's version control. In the case it can bring the network overhead because of frequent remote calls caused by the large number of the bean classes.
* So, should I use the both patterns? If yes, how to manage the interaction the patterns. If no, which one to use.
Versioning is a separate issue. Generally, the more coarsely grained your transfer / command object is, the more changes are likely to impact dependent objects.
Your command or transfer object does not have to be a vanilla JavaBean, where you are basically creating a bean that has data from other objects. You can simply use your command / transfer object to encapsulate already existing domain objects. I see no need to map to a JavaBean with what you have described.
Generally, a method signature should be understandable. This means that many times it is better to pass the method, say, two coarsely grained objects than a signature with a dozen primitives. There are no hard and fast rules here. If you find a method signature getting large, consider a transfer / command object. If you want one service to delegate calls to a number of other services, you can also create a transfer / command object to furnish the controlling service with the data it needs to invoke the dependent services.
2. E.g. I have a huge list of the Order objects and each Order object consists of other complicated objects. So, would I have trouble to transfer that list over network? If yes, how to manage it.
This is a large, open-ended question. If you are going to display it to a user on a screen, I do not see how you avoid a network transfer with the data. The general answer is to not pass the data itself but rather a token (such as a primary key, or a primary key and a start and stop range such as you see on a Google search result). You do want to limit the data over the network, but this comes at a cost. Usually, the database will receive additional load. Once that becomes unacceptable, you might start putting things into session. Then you worry about memory concerns, etc. There is no silver bullet to the problem. It depends on what issues you are trying to address and what trade-offs are acceptable in your environment.
Thank you!
AstghikBest of luck.
- Saish

RT multi-motor motion control in a closed loop system

Hello NI Community,
We have 12 stepper motors with load cells attached in line on each motor that are connected to a RT PXI chassis. We use an optical system to gather 3D data on the host computer which is used to calculate relative angles between 2 connected objects. This data is passed to the RT target as one of several feedback based control strategies that are used (relative angles, force on each load cell, motor position, etc.). Our Labview code is setup to utilize any of these control strategies for any motor, often using multiple strategies for different motors at the same time. The code deployed to our RT target is currently a single timed loop that incorporates the load cell reads, PID control calculations, motor command writes and position reads. In determining the timing of this loop we find it to be ~18Hz. We would like to integrate a new control strategy that is inefficient below 30Hz and are trying to determine how we can achieve this. It seems that our limiting factor is the constant writing/reading of each motor at ~4.6ms/motor, although this doesn't seem correct with the posted 62us speeds shown in the specs for the motion controllers. I'm not sure if this there is a setting that I am missing somewhere that is preventing me from achieving these speeds or if this is a function limitation of our hardware setup. We would like to achieve this with all 12 motors, although not all motors are always in use. The PXI components we are using are listed below.
PXI-1050 Chassis
PXI-8105 RT Controller
PXI-7344 Motion Controllers
UMI-7774 Motion Interface
Would any of the following be more advantageous than the others or is there another method someone has found useful in speeding up their systems.
Split motor read/write into another timed loop with a higher priority over the PID loop. (deterministic approach)
Create a unique read/write loop for each of the 3 Motion Controllers
Create boolean activation to ensure only the motors that are being used are incorporated in the control scheme
Sorry for the long post but I wanted to make sure I included as many details as possible. Thank you in advance for your help with this.
Brian

Hey,
Have you tried diagnosing where the problem is by seperating the processes and timing them to see what is causing the delay of the motor control to ~5ms?
Regards,
A. Zaatari
National Instruments
Applications Engineer

Transfer control Strategy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for