Transfer of handling unit

Hi Gurus,
In the 1st step transferring of production material to Marketing material along with Handling Unit + Batch Management.
Now after transferring prod material to marketing material thro T.Code:MB1B and movement type 309 now we were
able to post the material but not getting Handling Unit and batch
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
thanks in advance
Chandu
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 16, 2010 3:53 PM

Hi,
Today we find solution for the above issue Use Tcode:VLMOVE .
thx
Saratchandra

Similar Messages

Material to Material stock transfer betn Handling Unit to nonhandling Unit

Hi Experts,
Pls explain step by step procedure to Material to Material stock transfer betn Handling Unit to nonhandling Unit.

Hi,
You have several options. In case you use the Stock Transport order scenario, you simple pick and pack in the HU managed SLOC and PGI. You PGR in the non HU managed SLOC. HU's are not taken into consideration. If you would use inbound deliveries, you can have the HU's copied from the inbound to the outbound delivery but still you dont do anything with the HU in the non-HU SLOC.
You can also use tcode VLMOVE, if your HU managed SLOC is not connected to a WM. You do a 311 posting which creates a posting change delivery. After PGI the HU is moved from SLOC 1 to SLOC 2.
MdZ

Single Transfer Order for Multiple Handling Units

I have been researchig the ability to create a single transfer order for multiple handling units. My assumptions are if it can be done that:
1) A transfer order can have a single source, so if the source document for the handling unit (delivery) is different, that means different transfer order
2) A TO can have multiple materials (line items) with different destination bins and quantities per bin
I looked at the configuration for TO Split, but it's not clear that this will handle my requirement.
I also saw this http://aq33.com/material-management/Articles-005798.html and it also says that my requirement can't be meant. I'm just checking before I tell my customer this cannot be done.

Yes you are right, if Source document is different, you need to go with different TO.
But you can choose the Handling unit split, while creating a TO itself. i.e., You can quantify the goods for each handling unit.
Edited by: Ganesh M on Feb 29, 2012 6:20 AM

Handling unit transfer (311 move) using bapi_goodsmvt_create

MII is using bapi_goodsmvt_create to do a 311 type Handling unit movement. While BAPI is successful and returns a response back as "Delivery 80817152 created". But in ERP, this BAPI is creating a outbound delivery while it should be inbound delivery.
So basically transfer is not happening there if I check in humo.
If Movement Indicator is set to "I" in BAPI request than ERP sends error message " Update control of movement type is incorrect (entry 311 XX_I)
I would like to know if some body has experienced the same issue & has any resolution and also want to confirm that handling unit transfer is possible with bapi_goodsmvt_create.
Thanks a lot
Regards
Ram Upadhayay

This BAPI only conducts goods movements. It does not affect the handling unit.
If you want to process a handling unit you must use a different BAPI. Are you attempting to unpack the HU?
Use BAPI_HU_UNPACK.

Confirming transfer order for nested handling units (picking and shipping)

Hi
My shipping location is HU + WM, I understand we cannot "auto confirm" Transfer Orders during creation from an outbound delivery (LT03) in the case of nested HUs because the system wants to know which exact box HUs ( The TO only specifies the pallet HU...storage unit)
I have an automatic Pick HU created during TO confirmation but the system still prompts for me to enter box HUs that need to be shipped/repacked on LT12. This makes logical sense but is slowing down our shipping process. Since we do not put HU labels on our boxes, the picker has to go into HUMO, enter the pallet HU, retrieve the box HUs and finally enter some of those on the TO confirmation screen to match the open quantity. In reality we don't really care what HUs he picks as long as he picks from the right pallet.
Is there any way to automate this? If the system can pick box HUs sequentially, randomly or create further pick HUs. Anything but doesnt ask the picker to put in the box HU numbers
OR
Is there a way to auto confirm TOs during creation
OR
Is there any way to putaway box level HUs into the warehouse at the end of the production line so that Storage Unit is the box HU number and not the pallet HU number, that way it wouldn't prompt me for box HUs during picking.
I would really appreciate your help.

This is the standard SAP for picking nested handling units. You can do some more reading on this by accessing the SAP note 829266.
We had a similar problem with nested handling units - what we ended up doing was writing a BDC program that would take the nested handling unit and pack it back onto that HU instead of the pick HU after TO confirmation was done in the delivery.
In order to get your TO to automatically confirm, check the configuration for the storage type that its picking from - look to see if "Storage Type requires confirmation for removal/placement" is checked.
You can als ocheck the movement type configuration for Propose Confirmation.

QA32 UD for Handling Units results in a transfer posting delivery?

In our environment we have Handling Units, Serial Numbers and QM. In the mateial master the QM inspection types are set to inspecting by HU. The inspection lot gets created correctly and it references all the HUs. When we perform a usage decision and transfer the HUs to unrestricted stock in QA32. The system creates a transfer posting delivery that I then have to go and pick the HUs onto and then PGR the transfer posting delivery. It seems to me that because QA32 is working with the HUs it should direclty post the stock to unrestricted. I don't understand why I need this Transfer Posting Delivery.
Can anyone confirm that, yes indeed this is standard SAP behavior and we have to live with it or Am I missing something and no the system can directly post an HU with serial numbers form 'Q' stock to unrestricted via QA32.
Thanks for your help,
Steve

Hi,
The Standard SAP process is as follows,
1. GR --> Inbound Delivery created and stock is in 902Q
2. QM processes
3. Take Usgae Decision --> Transfer Posting Delivery Created
4. Create TO and confirm TO with reference to step 3 Delviery (Sotck moved from 902Q to 922Q then 922 without Q to 902 without Q(Unrestrcited use)) (This TO Creation and confirmation can be automated)
5. Now create TO and confirm TO with reference to Step 1 Delivery (Stock moved from 902 without Q (unrestriced)) to the permanent storage (unrestricted use stock).
I hope this will help you.
Regards,
K.Annadurai.

Problem in 301 Stock transfer via VLMOVE for Handling Unit movement

Hi Gurus
I am having one issue, where handling unit is active. So user facing one issues that user has posted the stock around 10 qty , after some material movements , stock showing as 9 in MMBE , where as checking the handling units showing 10 In HUMO . Now user wants to do the stock transfer 301 via VLMOVE. But system is giving error message like u201Cdeficit of stock, handling units can't be movedu201D, anybody advise is there anyway how user can do this transaction.
Regards
Edited by: venkat g on Aug 19, 2010 1:03 PM

Hi,
The solution for creating inbound delivery that you people have suggested is already in place. The problem is not with creation of inbound delivery but with assigning the material HUs to the inbound delivery. As material HUs are having status assigned to Shipment Document which is created after outbound delivery is processed. How should I go about it? Even after status of shipment document is made complete, assignment of HUs to inbound delivery is not possible. Please help to resolve this issue.
Thanks and regards,
Sudhir Dahake

Confirm Transfer Order - Assign Handling unit

Hi All,
When I try to confirm a Transfer Order system by default assigns a Pallet (packaging material - pallet) handling unit.
Is there a way I can assign a Master Carton handling unit (packaging material - MC)?
Am I missing any customizing entries?
Please help.
Thanks,
Meghna

Hi,
the customizing for the creation of the Pick-HU:
IMG: Logistics Execution -> Warehouse Management -> Interfaces -> Shipping -> Define Shipping Control.
Define Control for Automatic Creation of Pick HUs. Check the entries for you whse/source/destination/movmnt type.
I suppose at least that is what you mean with "by default assigns a Pallet (packaging material - pallet) handling unit". Or anything else?
Best regards
Juergen
Edited by: Juergen Pitz on Feb 17, 2010 8:38 AM

Nested Handling Units and Confirmation of Transfer Order - Pick HU

Friends & Gurus,
I have nested (low level) handling units and when confirming I would like one of the nested HU to become the pick-HU. So far I haven't been able. The pick-HU is always generated with a new number and if I try to assign manually one of the nested HU the systems says that the HU is not assigned to the TO.
Any comments or ideas will be appreciated.

I fully agree and thanks for coming back.
I can unpack the nested HU and then create a TO and select the unpacked HU (now a SU) as a full HU removal. I believe this is not operative, the idea is the operator gets to the big box, chooses (scans) one of the small box (nested) and confirms the TO. If somebody back at the office has first to unpack one of the nested HU (how could he know which one if there are 30 of them? Which one is on the top?) it makes it unviable.
Are we on sync?

HU - handling unit is currently part of an outbound delivery

Hello Experts,
i need to create an HU assigned to an outbound delivery.
I tried with function L_TO_PICKHU_ASSIGN, this function create the HU not assigned therefore VEKP-VBOBJ = 12.
What i need is an HU with VEKP-VPOBJ = 01 - The handling unit is currently part of an outbound delivery .
Do you know how can i fix this problem??
Thanks in advance
Boris Besana

Boris,
Did you do LH01 and assign a pick-HU to the pick-TO for the outbound delivery (unless auto pickHU assignment is configed in IMG)?
Usually when you confirm the pick TO the pick HU assigned to the TO get assigned to the Outbound Delivery which references the TO, resulting in VEKP-VPOBJ = 01.
If PGI hasn't done, have you tried returning the stock via LT0G (Return Transfer for OD) to return the stock/HU?
Mewan

Delivery item not generated after repacking handling units

Dear All,
I am using handling units. In the outbound delivery, I pick handling units using transfer orders. When the TO is confirmed, I get a line for packing material items in my delivery.This is because in the customizing for delivery type, I have flagged the required indicator.
Then, I repack the contents into an already existing HU and then delete the empty HU.I use BAPI_HU_CHANGE_HEADER to assign HU to delivery, WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE to repack contents and BAPI_HU_DELETE_FROM_DEL to delete the emptied HU.The problem is that no lines are generated for the handling units into which contents were repacked.
Any ideas?

no solution.

Destructive Samples with Handling Units

Dear Experts,
I just wanted to check if there's anyone who has encountered destructive inspection for samples with Handling Units and how this was managed (via enhancements/operational workaround).
Based on SAP KBA 1771624, destructive sampling will not work for HU due to all or nothing approach. We are currently considering the following options but would like to get your insights on this in case there is a better approach for this problem.
1. During Goods Receipt, sample usage quantity will be packed in separate HU from the rest of the quantity. This option will work provided that sample usage quantity is known before quality inspection. e.g. I will recieve 100 pcs of MAT A, 15 pcs for sample usage will be packed under HU1 and the remaining 85 pcs under HU2. UD stock posting will be performed in 2 steps, 1st for GI to sample usage for HU2 and 2nd for transfer to unrestricted/blocked/etc. for HU2
2. Receive full quantity under 1 HU. Complete quality inspection (results recording, ud and stock posting). Unpack the material to be able to perform GI to sample for the quantity that was used for destructive inspection.

Hi Craig/Vignesh,
Thank you for your providing your inputs on this. I will take them into consideration.
I have another option to address this requirement, that is to (1) receive the material into non HU storage location (2) perform UD and stock posting, i.e. GI to sample usage and unrestricted-use/blocked stocks (3) transfer unrestricted-use/blocked stocks to HU managed location.
Do you think this will be more efficient operationally versus the other 2 options above?
I am trying to find the most effective way to address this requirement with minimum impact to Logistics operation. Most of our materials are managed in HU and destructive sampling is regularly done so users will be performing the steps in SAP a lot.

Handling Units and BADI_HU_AUTOPACK

We are setting up handling units(HU's) to be created at the time of Transfer Order(TO) creation. We have implemented the badi BADI_HU_AUTOPACK. What I am looking for is the way to link the handling unit number with the line items on the TO so that when the user goes to confirm the transfer order the HU's and the line items are aligned as desired. In the CT_ITEMS parameter I can see the handling units and the TO item data, but the hadling unit number has not yet been created. I would appreciate any input on this issue.

Those fields are filled. The HU is field EXIDV below, and the $0000000001 is like a placeholder, since the HU number has not yet been generated. My assumption was that this number to be created would be linked with the TO Item 000001. This is not the case when viewing the TO.
VENUM     C     10
EXIDV     C     20      $0000000001
VELIN     C     1      1
BELNR     C     10      1001003116
POSNR     N     6      000001
SUB_HU_VENUM     C     10
SUB_HU_EXIDV     C     20

Problem while unpacking an handling unit using FM HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING

Hi ,
I want to unpack an HU from an outbound delivery and transfer to other storage location using FM 'HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING'.I could find out that only quantities are transferred but unpacking HU is not done.
Below is the code i am using for unpacking.
CALL FUNCTION 'HU_GET_HUS'
        EXPORTING
          if_lock_hus = 'X'
          it_venum    = it_hu1
        IMPORTING
          et_header   = it_hdr1
          et_items    = it_item1
        EXCEPTIONS
          hus_locked = 1
          no_hu_found = 2
          fatal_error = 3
          OTHERS      = 4.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
        l_error = 'X'.
        CLEAR: g_msgid, g_msgno, g_msgv1,g_msgv2, g_msgv3, g_msgv4.
        g_msgid = sy-msgid.
        g_msgno = sy-msgno.
        g_msgv1 = sy-msgv1.
        g_msgv2 = sy-msgv2.
        g_msgv3 = sy-msgv3.
        g_msgv4 = sy-msgv4.
        PERFORM message_scr USING g_msgid g_msgno g_msgv1 g_msgv2 g_msgv3 g_msgv4.
        EXIT.
      ENDIF.
      LOOP AT it_hu1 INTO wa_hu.
        CLEAR: wa_item1,l_error,l_post.
        READ TABLE it_hdr1 INTO wa_hdr1 WITH KEY venum = wa_hu-venum.
        CLEAR : g_venum, g_plant, g_sloc, g_whno, g_stype, g_sbin.
*       get the warehouse details
          SELECT SINGLE lgnum lgtyp lgpla FROM lein INTO (g_whno,g_stype,g_sbin)
            WHERE lenum = wa_hdr1-exidv.
          IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
* Get the plant and storage location for WM managed
            SELECT SINGLE werks lgort FROM lqua INTO (g_plant, g_sloc)
                                 WHERE lgnum = g_whno
                                   AND lgtyp = g_stype
                                   AND lgpla = g_sbin
                                   AND lenum = wa_hdr1-exidv.
          ELSE.
* Get the Venum (Internal HU Number)
            SELECT SINGLE venum FROM vekp INTO g_venum
            WHERE exidv = wa_hdr1-exidv.
            IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
* Get the plant and storage location for Non-WM managed
              SELECT SINGLE werks lgort FROM vepo INTO (g_plant, g_sloc)
                WHERE venum = wa_hu-venum.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
          READ TABLE it_item1 INTO wa_item1 WITH KEY venum = wa_hu-venum.
          IF sy-subrc = 0.
            CLEAR :wa_pack_unpack.
            MOVE-CORRESPONDING wa_item1 TO wa_pack_unpack.
            wa_pack_unpack-venum = wa_item1-venum.
            wa_pack_unpack-vepos = wa_item1-vepos.
            wa_pack_unpack-velin = wa_item1-velin.
            wa_pack_unpack-belnr = wa_item1-vbeln.
            wa_pack_unpack-posnr = wa_item1-posnr.
            MOVE wa_item1-vemng TO l_vemng.
            CONCATENATE l_vemng '-' INTO l_vemng.
            CONDENSE l_vemng NO-GAPS.
            MOVE l_vemng TO wa_pack_unpack-quantity.
            wa_pack_unpack-altme = wa_item1-altme.
            wa_pack_unpack-matnr = wa_item1-matnr.
            wa_pack_unpack-charg = wa_item1-charg.
            wa_pack_unpack-werks = g_plant.
            wa_pack_unpack-lgort = g_sloc.
            wa_pack_unpack-wdatu = wa_item1-wdatu.
            wa_pack_unpack-vfdat = wa_item1-vfdat.
          ENDIF.
*          *Find the partner location
          CLEAR: g_hu_managed, g_partner_sloc.
          CALL FUNCTION 'V51S_HU_LGORT'
            EXPORTING
              if_lgort         = g_sloc
              if_werks         = g_plant
            IMPORTING
              ef_hu_managed    = g_hu_managed
              ef_partner_lgort = g_partner_sloc
            EXCEPTIONS
              lgort_not_exist = 1
              OTHERS           = 2.
          IF sy-subrc <> 0.
          ENDIF.
          IF g_hu_managed = 'X'.
            wa_pack_unpack-umlgo = g_partner_sloc.
          ENDIF.
          CALL FUNCTION 'HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING'
            EXPORTING
              is_packing_request = wa_pack_unpack
            IMPORTING
              es_p_request       = wa_pack_unpack
            EXCEPTIONS
              missing_data       = 1
              hu_not_changeable = 2
              not_possible       = 3
              customizing        = 4
              weight             = 5
              volume             = 6
              serial_nr          = 7
              fatal_error        = 8
              OTHERS             = 9.
          IF sy-subrc <> 0.
            l_error = 'X'.
          ELSE.
            l_post = 'X'.
          ENDIF.
          IF l_error IS INITIAL AND l_post EQ 'X'.
            CALL FUNCTION 'HU_POST'
              EXPORTING
                if_synchron = 'X'
                if_commit   = 'X'
              IMPORTING
                et_messages = it_messages.
        ENDLOOP.
Please help if any parameter need to be set for unpacking of HU.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Sailaja,
I have similar requirements like this before with HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING FM. It was a tough debugging before I came up with the right solution. Unfortunately, I was not able to document that code..
But here is what I have been doing.
Youre on track with the solution below, never use BDC as it will only limit the Handling units that you wish to put into.
The function modules that starts with V5_ plays important role as you need to initialize the global variables and table of this function group with values before calling HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING FM
Debug inside the Function module, and look for the FM that returns SY-SUBRC <> 0 then set a breakpoint.
Restart the program then debug inside that FM again (and I do not want to go further on the details, I give you the presumption of literacy)
You will find some items that has no value, try to initialize everything by utilizing the FM for this function group V51S.
Happy Debugging.

Repacking of Handling Units

Hello All,
In HUM, there is a Handling unit with some quantity of material in it. This HU is assigned to an Outbound delivery. Now I want to repack the items into another HU (having different packaging material) and delete the previous HU. I try this process in HUPAST, although I do the deleting and reapacking process during saving I get a hard stop message as "Movt type 990 is not for immediate confirmation". This does not allow me to save the things in delivery. When I checked in spro, 990 is set for repacking without immediate confirmation.
Can some one please explain me what process to be done for repacking in this case.
Thanks,
Amit G

Hello All,
I used LT09 to transfer the HU to repacking storage type and that solved the problem.
Amit G

Transfer of handling unit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for