Transfer Posting 412 E triggers transaction key AUM

Hi everybody,
I'm trying to do a transfer posting ( 412 E) , every data ("dest" and "from" as material, plant, batch and storage location ) are the same. But the system is triggering the transaction key AUM, and I dont know why. I 've checked the material price (MAP) and it didn't change.
Pls your help!!!

The transfer posting made with the movement type 412 E is a reversal movement type (for the movement type 412, T156-XSTBW = X; so the movement type 412 is a reversal movement). The valuation logic for transfer postings made with reversal movements is explained in the note 180503.
The material, valuation type and sales order item has an entry in table EBEW . Table EBEW stores the valuated sales order stock, similar to MBEW, but this type of stock has its own pricing. All goods movements with movement type 411/412 special stock E (valuated) will be done the price determination of table EBEW.
As explained in the attached note 180503 when you make transfer posting with movement type 412 and special stock indicator E into the sales order stock from the valuated stock the goods movement is now valuated with the price of the receiving valuation segment of the of the sales order stock and not with the price of the issuing valuation segment.
The difference between the valuation in issuing segment to stock account and the valuation in receiving segment to stock account will be posted to AUM account.

Similar Messages

Transaction key UMB is triggered while VL02N

Dear All,
At the time of releasing commercial invoice, it is triggering transaction key UMB due to which previous price of material is posted to price difference account.
And this is happening for particular sales order only.
I am not able to locate the reason for the same.
Kind Regards,
Mehul

Hi,
UMB is triggered if the standard price of a material has been changed and a movement or an invoice is posted to the previous period (at the previous price).
So please check if the price is changed or Date is in Previous Period.
Br,Vivek

Query on OBYC Transaction key

Dear Experts ,
I have a few queries regarding automatic postings :
1.What process triggers the transaction key AUM ? what type of account should be assigned here ?
2.What process triggers the transaction key BSV? what type of account should be assigned here ? Hw different is it from GBB-VBO ?
3. What is the difference between DIF , PRD & UMB ?
4. Is GBB-VKA relevant for make to stock scenario ?
Regards
Anis

Hi
1) AUM is triggered if the material iin supplying planrt is maintained either in MAP or Standard price and material in recieving plant is in stamdard price and there should be a price difference.The differencial amount will be posted to the Expense/Income account through AUM
2)BSV will be triggered during subcontracting GR.it is the Transaction event key which defines the Change in stock account .This is maintained to accomodate the credit side entry for the output material during GR.Whereas GBB-VBO is for input material consumtion during subcontracting GR.It provides the Debit side entry for Input material consumption
3)DIF is triggered during IV if there is balance and you still want to post it
PRD is triggered if the material is maintained as Standard Price and the value is differenet from the PO value .
UMB is triggered if you want to revaluate the material th MR21
4) GBB-VKA is for make to order scenario where you make a PO directly with reference to sales order
Regards
Sandeep

In MIGO transaction Transfer posting user exist or BADI or Enhacements

Hi Experts,
Could you please help on this issue.
My requirment is, In MIGO transaction code, Transfer Posting (i.e., Storage location) screen, in item level there is Transfer posting tab From and Dest two sub screens are there.
if user enter material , plant and stoargae location in From side and that will be same maintain in Destination side.
If any user will change in Destination level Material or Plant or Stoarage location, I need to populate the error message.
Could you please tell me BADI or user exist or Enhacement for this requirment.
I have serached in SDN and debug the transaction code MIGO. I didn't found user exist and enhacment.
Thanks
Srinu

HI ,
If i tried this Enhacment MB_MIGO_SC. I have put break point and it is not triggering, when i am saving/ Checking the postings in MIGO transaction code.
Thanks
Srinu

AUM(Expenditure/Income from transfer posting)

Hi,
We are making STO (same plant price control is V ,SLoc TO SLoc),at the time of Mvt : 351 no AUM account key is hitting but when we go for reversal Mvt : 352 it is hitting AUM.it also hitting the AUM for Mvt :542 not at the time of Mvt 541.why it so .It is my pleasure if any one explain the logical reason for this
Regards
Vijay Patil

Hi Amarouch ,
Did you solve your problem? I'm with this same issue in my project now.
Ex: Material 1 - Price: 10 (V)
Material 2 - Price: 5 (V)
In the same plant I'm doing the transfer posting - 309
What I want to do is accounting the price difference in a differenta account.
Thanks in advance,
Guilherme

Transfer posting of tax in a cross company code transaction thru' RFBUST10

Hi,
I have a doubt regarding using the program RFBUST10 transferring the tax in a cross company transaction.
I have posted an invoice entry as below and I want to transfer the tax posting of 7.00 from company code 1 to company code 2 using the program RFBUST10.
Cr - 31 - 3rd party vendor - total amount of invoice co code 1 - 214.00
Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 co code 1 - C7 (Tax code at 7%)
Dr - 40 - expense account - 100.00 to co code 2 C7 (Tax code at 7%)
I have successfully posted and the tax amount of 7.00 is also transferred from company code 1 to company code2 but now I have 2 problems:
1) The program (RFBUST10) is permitting to transfer tax for the same cross- company code document multiple times. Please let me know how to track whether the cross company code document is already processed for transfer posting of tax.
2) In the transfer posting document as below ,the tax code in the first line item (clearing account) is defaulted to C0 , I would like to know from where this tax code defaults, I have not maintained the default tax code in the GL master.
Dr - 40 clearing Account 107 - C0 (tax code 0%)
Cr- 50 clearing account 100 - C7(tax code at 7%)
Cr - 50 Tax account 7 C7
Please let me know how to resolve these issues.
Tks
SS

hi venkat sri,
gud day, did you manage to solve the transfer intercompany tax using program RFBUST10? Could you share the solution?
Looking forward for your reply.
Regards,
Jay

Transfer posting against purchase order in MIGO transaction

Dear all,
How can we make the settings in MIGO transaction code for Transfer posting with reference to Purchase order.
Other wise, i want to do the transfer posting of my goods to my sub contractor with refernce to PO number in MIGO Tcode
Any config settings are required.
Thanks & Regards,
R.Saravanan

As per SAP online help you have three options to post components to your SC vendor's special stock:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/4d/2b906243ad11d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
You can provide components for existing purchase orders in the following ways:
from the SC Stock Monitoring for Vendor list as a goods issue via Inventory Management
from the SC Stock Monitoring for Vendor list as a delivery via Shipping
from the Inventory Management menu
If you read the instruction for the third option (first two is about ME2O), you will see it is speaking about MB1B and not about MIGO.
1. From the Inventory Management menu, choose Goods movement ® Transfer posting.
2. Enter the issuing plant and storage location. Choose Movement type ® Transfer posting ® Stck w. subcontract. ® From unrestricted. Enter the vendor and then choose Transfer posting ® Create with reference ® To purchase order.
A dialog box appears in which you can enter up to 4 purchase orders.
In MIGO you can choose only "A08" with "R02", "R08", "R09". "R01" is not allowed for "A08" in standard system.
(Maybe it is possible but I do not know how...)
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Aug 5, 2010 11:54 AM
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Aug 5, 2010 11:54 AM

Posting transaction key PRD

Good morning,
I should do a little analysis about our G/L accounts definition for transaction key PRD. What I would like to understand is how SAP configures the automatic posting procedure or, in a better way, how SAP determines which transaction keys must be used in a particular situation.
I think that these tables should be involved in the procedure:
T156SC
T156SY
T156X
T156W
Does someone have more information?
Thank you in advance.
Francesco Alborghetti

Dear Francesco,
Go to T.code - OBYC.
Select the posting key - PRD.
Give the concern chart of Account and go inside.
You will see Valuation modification and Valuation class assigned to GL accounts.
If you want to include the movement types into this, you need the Account modifier. If so, click rules,
select the check box of Account modifier also and save the screen first.
Then go into the trasnaction, where you will find the Account modifier will also be included. You can select the correct account modifier which is in turn assigned with the movement type.
Hope this helps.
Reward points if satisfied.
Thanks.
Augustine Ponraj.

New transaction key with the posting key 24 and 34

Hi,
i want to create a new transaction key with the posting key 24 and 34.
the corresponding table is T030B.
but what is the Tcode/ IMG path to create it?
Regards,
Swetha

Hi,
Go to FBKP. Click on Automatic Postings.
Suppose you want to see the Exchange Rate diff. then click on it. You will see the transaction. Suppose KDB. Then double click on it. Now click on posting keys. The same will be defined in the table which is given by you.
Regards,
Jigar

Movement Types & Transaction Key/Posting Keys

Hi Friends,
Can any one explain How the Movement Types & Transaction Key are related/
where can we see the Movement types? I think we can see Transaction keys in OBYC but Movement types?
and is there any relation b/w condition types and Movement types?
Thank you ,
Paaarthu

Hi
In material master accounting view we will define Valuation class & in OBYC we will assing GL accounts for valuation class, under transaction key BSX (Inventory posting).
Go to T.code:OMWB here you can simulate the accounts.
I think this transaction gives a very clear picture on MM-FI integration.
It even specifies if there are any missing GL accounts.
Have a look at OMWB and let me know if you have any further questions.
Thanks
Kalyan

Transfer Posting - Transaction MB1B

Hello Friends,
Transaction - MB1B (Enter Transfer Posting)
Movement - 303 (Transfer posting plant to plant - remove from storage)
As per above transaction and Movement description, it is very clear this movement being used for Plant to Plant transfer.
Here I am having one query, in initial screen of MB1B, inputs to be given as Movement Type 303, Plant, ABC and Storage location is 001then Enter,
In second screen, there is a Receiving Plant
Suppose we have to enter other plant (other than ABC), but by mistake (knowningly / unknowingly) even we enter same plant (ABC), system is taking and after save material document is created.
Suppose system should not create (allow to save) if issuing plant as well as Receiving plants are same.
Am I correct? If correct, Please explain how to restrict this?
If I am not correct, please explain why?
Best Regards,
Vijayakumar TVN

Dear Mr.Jürgen L.
I am having one query here, the meaning of transfer posting shall either within a plant (between storage locations) or plant to plant. In this case, when I am choosing 303 movement - Transfer posting plant to plant - remove from storage, it should be between two plants, obviously, system should not allow receiving plant is equal to issue plant.
Could u please clarify my understanding is correct or not?
Best Regards,
Vijayakumar TVN

Transfer Posting - MB1B 412 E

Hi,
While doing the transfer Posting for 412 E , I am unable to make the the Sales Order field as Optional. Kindly please guide me.
regards,
R.Ramakrishnaraj

Sales Order Number is Mandatory if you USe MB1B 411 E & 412 E movement types. Because based on the Sales order number only Transferring Stock is Possible.
Even if you change the sales Order Number is Optional without Entering sales Order Number How does System understand against Which Sales order transfer is happening also System will not allot to save you with out so no.
Regards,
Ashok

Miro posting - BSX transaction key take place

Dear Consultants,
While posting MIRO document, the BSX transaction key is taking place & posting key is 89 apart from WRX transaction key, the figure of (MIRO )WRX transaction key ie the automatic G/L a/c assign in OBYC is matching with WRX transaction key in MIGO.
pls note that BSX transaction key i.e automatic G/L posting is taking effect in MIGO.( 120000Rs)
My question is why BSX transaction key ( hardly 200 Rs ) is taking place in MIRO posting, wht was the reason & further there is no invoice condition difference from PO & MIRO.
Anticipating your advices.
Edited by: vivek tripathi on Sep 26, 2008 6:55 AM

Hi
There must be some difference in the PO Value and the Actual invoice received from the Vendor. This difference can be due to various reasons, e.g. difference in Basic Value, or difference in Sales Tax, or even difference in amount of excise duty as that as per the PO condition and as captured in J1IEX
regards
Parag Bhargava

Condition type in PO not posting to desired transaction key.

Dear experts,
I was wondering whether someone could help me with the following:
I have defined a condition type for which specific additive costs for a purchased finished good should be added. The material is valued at standard price with the specifics that prior to the price calculation via transaction CK74N, additive costs are calculate and then added when executing CK11N that is composed of the price of the purchased finished good and the additive costs. We have created a condition type to break down the additive costs in the one hand and the material cost on the other. We want to have these costs to be posted against a specific cost account. We have created a transaction (via OBYC) for that and added it to the calculation schema. However, when posting the Goods Receipt, the additive costs (difference between the standard price and material price in the PO) are not posted to the desired transaction/GL account but to the price difference account (transaction PRD).
Could anyone please provide me with the customizing steps I should follow to succeed in the flow we want to implement? Can this desired outcome be done via standard or should any User Exit or programming be done to get the expected results?
Thanks in advance and regards,
David.

hi
Standard SAP Post the difference only with PRD account.

Printout of Transfer Posting/Scrapping transaction

Hi Friends,
I am able to take the printout of Goods Receipt(101 Movt. Type) and Goods Issue (Movt.Type 201 & 261) only. I am unable to take the printout of Transfer Posting:storage location (Movt. Type 311) and Scrapping (Movt Type 551).
I am using the T-code MB90 for printout of GR and GI. I am using Output type WA03 for GI and WE03 for GR.
But when I select WA03 for printout of Scrapping document or Transfer Posting Document, the system gives a message "No message for Initial processing exists". Should I use WA03 as output type or should I select something else.
Please guide for the printout.
Thanks & Regards
Satya

Hi Satyabrata,
use T-code OMB5 , OMB4 and OMJL and setup relevant Print item
we can have following option:
P     Text
     No Document Printout
1     Material Document Printout
2     Return Delivery
3     GR/GI Slip for Subcontracting
4     Inventory List W/o Sales Price
5     Inventory List w. Sales Price
6     Matl Doc. Printout for GR/GI
Q
X
Please reward If useful.
thx,
MJ

Transfer Posting 412 E triggers transaction key AUM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for