Transfer posting mov type 309

Dear friends,
Please help me in following scenario,
In MIGO, I want to do transfer posting from one material to another .using mov. type 309.
My problem is that, my destination material batch number is comming same as sender material batch number. I want system to automatically create new internal batch number for destination material.
Please guide.
Regards,
Amit Shirsath

Dear Madam,
I have done the same using MB11, but i am not able to do the same with MIGO, and my clients requirement is to do with MIGO only..
Regards,
Amit Shirsath

Similar Messages

  • Transfer Posting Mov Type 311 restrict "R10 Other"

    Hi Gurus,
    The Client wants to make transfer posting mov type 311 against a reservation and restrict the option "R10 Other" in MIGO. The users will only be allowed to make transfer posting against a reservation. Is this possible? Could I unable this option from MIGO for this kind of movement?
    Regards

    Problem solved
    SPRO->Materials Management->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->Settings for Enjoy Transactions->Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO)->Settings for Transactions and Reference Documents

  • Material to Material Transfer using Movement Type 309

    Hi,
    We have activated the material ledger.
    Issues:
    When we transfer material A to Material B using Movement Type 309 the price difference from Material A was not allocated to Material B after executing CKMLCP.
    But the another company who using the materail to material transfer, the price difference was allocated to receiving material.

    Hi,
    Please check SAP Note 167722 to able to do multi-level price determination for material transfer with using modification.
    best regards, Takashi

  • Stock Transfer using movement type 309 of in-transit material

    Hi Gurus,
    We have a scenario where we want to post a 309 movement type on an intransit STO stock (sto is done from PWO, this is done to solve a SOX compliance problem). But it seems that this is not possible as the 309 can not be posted without a s. loc. Is there any alternative to this? Can a two step transfer using 313 and 315 do the trick? Please advise.
    Thanks

    In real life you cannot do anything to a material that is somewhere on the road, hence it is pretty limited what you can do in SAP.
    What exactly do you want to do?

  • Transfer posting movt type 309

    Hi Guru,
    I want to do the transfer posting material to material 309 movement type but base unit of measure different kg & MT.
    Input material having Base unit of measure kg & receiving material having base unit of measure MT.
    System giving this error message.
    The "receiving" material is not managed in the same stockkeeping unit as
    the "issuing" material. A transfer posting "material to material" is
    only possible if both materials are managed in the same stockkeeping
    unit.
    Please help me out its very arjent .
    regards,
    KIrti

    i want to do the transfer posting material to material 309 movement type but base unit of measure different kg & MT.
    Input material having Base unit of measure kg & receiving material having base unit of measure MT.
    How to do this please help me out MB1A 201old material ,but i am not getting u ,please tell me step by step.
    System giving this error message.
    The "receiving" material is not managed in the same stockkeeping unit as
    the "issuing" material. A transfer posting "material to material" is
    only possible if both materials are managed in the same stockkeeping
    unit.
    Please help me out its very arjent .
    regards,
    KIrti

  • Miss value FI Posting on Sales Order Transfer Posting movement Type 413 E

    Dear Expertise
                   I've a problem about sales order transfer posting. My both of Sales order (Source & Destination) are make to order and open with configurable material(KMAT). Both of sales order contain only one item on the same material no.
    Assume scenario material vastr
    Assume that material vastr is configurable material wait for sales order to fill characteristic and it was maintained standard price value = 1100
                    Sales order A  has plan cost  on material  VASTR  1000
                    Sales order B has plan cost material VASTR 980
    When we make a sales order transfer posting(Transfer from Sales Order A-> B) by transaction MIGO_TR by use movement type 413 E. It can post a transfer complete. But my problem is when I trace to FI-Document
                    It was post like this
                    Dr. Standard price                         1100
                    Cr. price for Sales order A(src.)  1000
                    Cr. Cost Variance                          +100
    I don't want it to offset with standarad price value. I want it to do like this
                    Dr. price for Sales order B(Des.)   980
                    Cr. price for Sales order A(src.)  1000
                    Dr. Cost Variance                           +20
    How can I configure it?   I trial to clear standard price by MR21, System can do it . But I don't want to clear it because it impact to other. I want to know. How can I configure system to take both of plan cost of sales order to offset each other please.
    Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:23 PM
    Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:42 PM
    Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:42 PM

    Hi,
    411- E- sales order to own stock
    412-E- Reversal of 411 E
    & 413-E-Sales order to sales order.
    Regards,
    Piyush

  • Material to Material transfer with movement type 321

    Dear Experts,
    Material to material transfer with movement type 309, the system create a price difference account if price control "S"
    but we transfer material to material with movement 321 (quality ), no price didderence account is generated, system showing different document
    Exp--- Material "A" with STD price 150
    Material "B" with STD price 100
    document is created
    Material A A/c. Credit 100
    Material B A/c. Dr. 150
    My question is, the price difference where is adjusting, is finance and costing books of account will effect.
    Kindly help to solve the issue
    Thanks & Regards,

    Dear Wasim,
    321 movement is to transfer the stock of a material lying in quality to unrestricted stock.
    It's not used for material to material transfer.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Posting with MM Movement Type 309 material to material: Error in WM

    Hello,
    i post an MM-Movement type (Bewegungsart) 309 (material to material).
    The MM-goods movement works, but then in warehouse mangagement there is a problem:
    The creation of the transfer order (Transportauftrag) stops in many cases.
    The aim is to post Material A to the same storage bin in Warehouse Management where Material B was before.
    I programmed this in user-exit (ZXLToU03) that by movement type 309, always taking same storage bin. But then I often get the error: transfer order could not be created. Then I have to do the creation of tranfer order in foreground and then I get an error like this:
    capacity of the bin location is not enough.
    The Problem is that I do a posting for example:
    001 010101                   to     922 Umbuchungzone    -->  Transfer order Pos 1
    922 Umbuchungszone  to    001 010101                    --> Transfer order Pos 2.
    And so the first transfer order position is not confirmed when I do the transfer order Pos 2.
    How can I confirm Pos 1 by batch-input? The Programm to do 309 should posting 1000 materials in one step. But in Warehouse management I get those problems?
    Is it possible to increase the capacitiy of the storage bin and then decrease it after creation of transfer order(where can I do this and when)???
    I hope anybody can help me.
    Thanks.

    Hello Kevin,
    I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
    This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
    Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
    A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
    Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
    Kind regards,
    Bart

  • Change the behavior for movement type 309 - Account post PRD

    Dear friends ,
    We need to transfer material to material using movement type 309.
    These material are using price control "S".
    When we transfer from material A to material B the price difference stay stopped in the PRD account.
    We need to revaluate the material B automatically and not let the price difference stopped in the PRD... when we run the Material Costs..via Material ledger.
    Does anyone knows a way to change this behavior ?
    best regards,
    Alessandro

    Dear Revi thanks for your answer !
    One more thing...
    We cannot change the valuation from S to V in the material B.
    Regarding the PRD postings... when the Controlling team runs the Material Ledger the price for material B should be changed/updated automatically, Am I right ?
    And then the PRD account must be cleared...
    Or I continue to do the MR22 manuall...or better... create an Abap program to run automatically clearing the PRD posting agains't the material via MR22 to correct the cost of this material.
    thanks once more.
    Ale

  • Movement Type 309 Not posting to the correct Cost Center

    Hi,
    We have changed the field status group for movement type 309 to be able to enter profit center. We maintained a cost center determination in OKB9 based on the profit center. However the system is ignoring the profit center entered in the MIGO (309) and picking the profit center from the material master.
    Material Master has Profit center 40000.
    MIGO posting has Profit Center 43005 which in turn has a cost center assigned to 100143005 cost center.
    When we do MIGO 309, with the profit center 43005, the accounting document is posted with profit center 40000 and cost center 100140000. Can anyone tell why is it ignoring the profit center maintained in the transaction?
    I also checked OMJJ and checked the "Account Assignment" box for transaction type AUM.
    Thanks and Regards
    Madhu Vutukuri

    HI,
    check SAPNET note 105024.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Problem on mb1b with Movement type 309

    when I use the t-code mb1b to transfer posting with Movement type 309,the system give a hint 'Account 40000000 requires an assignment to a CO object'. I checked the configuration of omwb and obyc.It seems no problem.
    So can anyone tell me how to solve the problem? Thanks!

    Hi
    Alternative to the above solution will tell u which should work,it seems from the error that you need to put the Cost Center or G/L account. But if you don't want
    the system to ask you everytime you do the goods transfer, you have to setup
    your Cost Element / CO object. Go to transaction KA02 and put the
    appropriate CO or Cost Element (when the system gave you the warning,
    normally it gives you the CO object that need account assignment) and
    assign the Default Acc.Assigment to the CO/Cost Element.
    But before you do that, I suggest you to contact your FICO people.
    Good luck
    Regards,
    Susi

  • GL account for movement type 309

    How to find GL account for movement type 309. Tcode etc
    Stop Cross-Posting

    Hi,
    Try using transaction code OMWB (press cancel on pop-up) >
    Press "Simulation" button and enter plant + mat + movement type >
    Press "Account assignments" button
    Dr/Cr G/L accounts displayed for posting lines.
    Kind regards,
    Robert

  • Costing implications with movement type 309

    Hi all,
    Is there any costing implications with movement type 309-material to material transfer within the plant.
    Thanks in advance.

    Jyotishman,
    The cost complication exists if there is price difference between the original material and the converted material. This is a highly risky movement type
    Example:
    Material A costs $100  - Quantity : 10 - Inventory cost = $1000
    Material B costs $1000 - Quantity: 10 - Inventory cost = $10000
    Total Inventory cost: $11000
    If material A 10 qty is converted to Material B then,
    Material B costs $1000 - Quantity: 20 - Inventory cost = $20000
    Total Inventory cost: $20000($9000 increase in value)
    If material B 10 qty is converted to Material A then,
    Material A costs $100 - Quantity: 20 - Inventory cost = $2000
    Total Inventory cost: $2000($9000 reduction value)
    In Indian scenario - This movement type will be monitored by the audit team so generally access to this movement type is highly restricted.
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Limiting users to select articles from movement type 309- SAP retail

    Hi experts,
    My client wants to restriction on limiting users selecting articles from movement type 309 in SAP retail. They need an option to predefine article list which can allows users to transfer articles using movement type 309. Is any standard way to accomplish this requirement or whether it s need ABAP development.
    Thank You & Best Regards
    Sameera

    this BAPI just creates movements, you access your Z-tables from the ABAP that calls this BAPI, isn't it?
    But in the exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_001  you can program to read the Z-tables and do the necessary steps to restrict the usage, hence you can use the standard transactions for the movements without needing an extra program that calls a BAPI.

  • Error in Standard SAP movement type 309?

    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
    Movement type > Assign WM Movement Type References to IM Movement Types
    IM Movement type 309 has as Reference Movement types WM 301, 302 and 309.
    IM Movement type 311 has as Reference Movement types WM 311, 312 and 309.
    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces > Inventory Management > Define
    Movement type > LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management
    Reference Movement type 301 has WM Movement type 301.
    Reference Movement type 302 has WM Movement type 302.
    Reference Movement type 309 has WM Movement type 309.
    Reference Movement type 311 has WM Movement type 311.
    Reference Movement type 312 have WM Movement type 312.
    Path: SPRO > Logistic execution > Warehouse Management > Activities > Transfers > Define Movement
    types
    WM Movement type 301 has Destination Storage type 920.
    WM Movement type 302 has Source Storage type 920.
    WM Movement type 309 has Source and Destination Storage type 922.
    WM Movement type 311 has Destination Storage type 9210.
    WM Movement type 312 has Source Storage type 921.
    In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 309 the material will be picked from a Storage
    bin and moved to Storage type 920. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 920 to the same Storage bin.
    The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
    This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
    In my opinion this means that if I make an IM movement with movement 311 the material will be picked from a Storage
    bin and moved to Storage type 921. After the change the material will be brought back from Storage type 921 to the same Storage bin.
    The change will be done with WM Movement type 309 in Storage type 922.
    This creates negative stock in both Storage type 920 and 922.
    Is this an error in SAP standard? Should I Change the Source and Destination Storage types of Movement types 301,302,311 and 312 to 922?

    Hi,
    Please check wheather the material type of the material belongs to NLAG/UNBW or any other type which will not have qty/value updations for that plant at Attributes of the material type at SPROlOGISTICS GeneralMaterial mastermaterila types
    Or take the question  mark which is there on the error screen so that the information will become self explanatory.
    Please reply back with your info.

Maybe you are looking for

  • New in XML Publisher

    Hi I'd like to know what do i need to start working with XML Publisher. Thanks

  • Mount webdav folder on OS Lion

    Hi I have iomega ix2-200 cloud edition nas drive and use it on regular basis thru wireless connection on afp command. The drive can easily be mounted on finder. The issue arises when I am outside (home network) and want to access nas drive. Currently

  • My icloud account won't verify. i never get the email to verify the account

    Please help! i have changed my itunes password, deleted my icloud account, nothing works. the account used to work fine, then just stopped.

  • IPod erases everything every time I sync it.....

    I've had my iPod for about 3 years now. It's in excellent condition, so maybe I need a new battery or something. But lately every time I plug in my iPod and sync it, it ends up erasing everything,so then I have to reset it every time. By the next day

  • Swap content between 2 iPhones

    Here's the situation. I've had a 3G iPhone for a while. It has quite a lot of apps, data, music etc on it. In March I got my wife a 3GS iPhone but she is not bothered about the latest functionality eg video etc so she is happy to swap phones. How do