Transfer posting movt type 309

Hi Guru,
I want to do the transfer posting material to material 309 movement type but base unit of measure different kg & MT.
Input material having Base unit of measure kg & receiving material having base unit of measure MT.
System giving this error message.
The "receiving" material is not managed in the same stockkeeping unit as
the "issuing" material. A transfer posting "material to material" is
only possible if both materials are managed in the same stockkeeping
unit.
Please help me out its very arjent .
regards,
KIrti

i want to do the transfer posting material to material 309 movement type but base unit of measure different kg & MT.
Input material having Base unit of measure kg & receiving material having base unit of measure MT.
How to do this please help me out MB1A 201old material ,but i am not getting u ,please tell me step by step.
System giving this error message.
The "receiving" material is not managed in the same stockkeeping unit as
the "issuing" material. A transfer posting "material to material" is
only possible if both materials are managed in the same stockkeeping
unit.
Please help me out its very arjent .
regards,
KIrti

Similar Messages

Transfer posting mov type 309

Dear friends,
Please help me in following scenario,
In MIGO, I want to do transfer posting from one material to another .using mov. type 309.
My problem is that, my destination material batch number is comming same as sender material batch number. I want system to automatically create new internal batch number for destination material.
Please guide.
Regards,
Amit Shirsath

Dear Madam,
I have done the same using MB11, but i am not able to do the same with MIGO, and my clients requirement is to do with MIGO only..
Regards,
Amit Shirsath

Transfer Posting Mov Type 311 restrict "R10 Other"

Hi Gurus,
The Client wants to make transfer posting mov type 311 against a reservation and restrict the option "R10 Other" in MIGO. The users will only be allowed to make transfer posting against a reservation. Is this possible? Could I unable this option from MIGO for this kind of movement?
Regards

Problem solved
SPRO->Materials Management->Inventory Management and Physical Inventory->Settings for Enjoy Transactions->Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO)->Settings for Transactions and Reference Documents

How to clear open posting change notices (Movt type 309)

Hi,
I want to clear the open PCN's created with mov type 309 (Posting change, general) being shown in LL01.
All these posting change quantity are positive. I am not able to nullify them because there is no stock of those materials.
Whenever I try to create a TO from LU04, the system is unable to take a storage type because of no stock.
Whenever I try to change the PCN;s status to :U", the system says that the souce data and dest data is same (both sloc's are same).
Please suggest an alternative to clear these PCN's.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Gaurav

Hi,
Pls check the below.
-Any open transfer orders for the posting change notice exists,once they confirmed the PCN will be cleared.
-Use LU02 to set a deletion status on the PCN.
Posting change notices can be created for same sloc's but the stock category of the source and destination will be different i.e. unretstirced to quality, unrestriced to blocked etc ....
Hope this helps you.
Rgds,
Kris.

Stock transfer 301 Movt Type

Hi,
I am doing Movt Type 301 Plant to Plant Stock transfer for unrestricted stock in one plant to another
The materials has QM activated with 08 inspection Type Active. Control of IL is such that only one IL gets created for plant/sloc/batch
After doing the first posting, I have done UD for the IL and posted stock to unrestricted. Then I tried to do multiple postngs to same sloc/batch
For the subsequent postings, for some materials the stock gets posted to quality and for some it gets posted to unrestricted. What should be the normal behaviour
What can be the reason

Hi,
Though I'm not sure I understood it correctly or not but seems you have issues with transfer postings (301 mvmnt with all QM active) and some of them goes to QI stock whereas others go to UR.
If that's the case, I believe you should check your inspection set up and look for 'Post to insp stock' under inspection type 08.
ntn

Miss value FI Posting on Sales Order Transfer Posting movement Type 413 E

Dear Expertise
               I've a problem about sales order transfer posting. My both of Sales order (Source & Destination) are make to order and open with configurable material(KMAT). Both of sales order contain only one item on the same material no.
Assume scenario material vastr
Assume that material vastr is configurable material wait for sales order to fill characteristic and it was maintained standard price value = 1100
                Sales order A has plan cost on material VASTR 1000
                Sales order B has plan cost material VASTR 980
When we make a sales order transfer posting(Transfer from Sales Order A-> B) by transaction MIGO_TR by use movement type 413 E. It can post a transfer complete. But my problem is when I trace to FI-Document
                It was post like this
                Dr. Standard price                         1100
                Cr. price for Sales order A(src.) 1000
                Cr. Cost Variance                          +100
I don't want it to offset with standarad price value. I want it to do like this
                Dr. price for Sales order B(Des.)   980
                Cr. price for Sales order A(src.) 1000
                Dr. Cost Variance                           +20
How can I configure it?   I trial to clear standard price by MR21, System can do it . But I don't want to clear it because it impact to other. I want to know. How can I configure system to take both of plan cost of sales order to offset each other please.
Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:23 PM
Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:42 PM
Edited by: Gareth John on Aug 16, 2010 2:42 PM

Hi,
411- E- sales order to own stock
412-E- Reversal of 411 E
& 413-E-Sales order to sales order.
Regards,
Piyush

Material to Material Transfer using Movement Type 309

Hi,
We have activated the material ledger.
Issues:
When we transfer material A to Material B using Movement Type 309 the price difference from Material A was not allocated to Material B after executing CKMLCP.
But the another company who using the materail to material transfer, the price difference was allocated to receiving material.

Hi,
Please check SAP Note 167722 to able to do multi-level price determination for material transfer with using modification.
best regards, Takashi

Transfer posting Mvt type 415

Hello All,
While doing transfer posting vide movement type 415, I am getting one error as "Account 62000026 requires an assignment to a CO object". How to solve this?
I have given Project / WBS element to which stock is to be transferred from unrestricted stock. This itself is a cost element.
Please help.
With regards.
Sanjay

Hello,
Go to FS00 --> 62000026 --> Click on the edit cost element button, it will take you to cost element screen. If you have a cost element , enter the same. Otherwise create a cost element with KA01, give G/L account and controlling area, save.
Prase

Stock Transfer using movement type 309 of in-transit material

Hi Gurus,
We have a scenario where we want to post a 309 movement type on an intransit STO stock (sto is done from PWO, this is done to solve a SOX compliance problem). But it seems that this is not possible as the 309 can not be posted without a s. loc. Is there any alternative to this? Can a two step transfer using 313 and 315 do the trick? Please advise.
Thanks

In real life you cannot do anything to a material that is somewhere on the road, hence it is pretty limited what you can do in SAP.
What exactly do you want to do?

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE error - Duplicate Transfer Posting

Hello,
I'm using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for transfer posting with GM Code 04 and Movement Type 311.
But the posted material document is incorrect. Instead of 2 lines only, the line items becomes 4.
Could anyone please help me?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Gold Yap,
      I have done the Transfer posting by using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE.
     Below i added my sample code. Please go through.
Report XYZ.
TABLES : mslb , mchb .
DATA : BEGIN OF i_stock OCCURS 0 ,
       matnr LIKE mslb-matnr ,
       werks LIKE mslb-werks ,
       charg LIKE mslb-charg ,
       sobkz LIKE mslb-sobkz,
       lifnr LIKE mslb-lifnr ,
       lblab LIKE mslb-lblab ,
       END OF i_stock .
DATA : BEGIN OF i_batch OCCURS 0 ,
       matnr LIKE mchb-matnr ,
       werks LIKE mchb-werks ,
       lgort LIKE mchb-lgort ,
       charg LIKE mchb-charg ,
       clabs LIKE mchb-clabs ,
       END OF i_batch .
DATA: BEGIN OF it_mess OCCURS 10,
      charg LIKE mslb-charg ,
      lgort LIKE mchb-lgort,
      lifnr LIKE mslb-lifnr,
      err LIKE bapiret2-message,
      flag,
      END OF it_mess.
DATA match.
DATA : header LIKE bapi2017_gm_head_01 . "OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA : code LIKE bapi2017_gm_code . " OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA : item LIKE bapi2017_gm_item_create OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA : i_return LIKE bapiret2 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE .
DATA : matdoc LIKE bapi2017_gm_head_ret .
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK b1 WITH FRAME .
SELECT-OPTIONS : s_matnr FOR mslb-matnr .
PARAMETERS : p_werks LIKE mslb-werks DEFAULT 'TPFB' .
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK b1 .
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT .
LOOP AT SCREEN .
    IF screen-name = 'P_WERKS' .
      screen-input = '0' .
      MODIFY SCREEN .
      CLEAR screen .
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP .
START-OF-SELECTION .
CLEAR: i_stock[],i_stock.
CLEAR: it_mess[],it_mess.
CLEAR: i_batch[],i_batch.
SELECT matnr werks charg sobkz lifnr lblab
FROM mslb INTO TABLE i_stock
WHERE matnr IN s_matnr
    AND werks = p_werks.
DELETE i_stock WHERE sobkz <> 'O'.
DELETE i_stock WHERE lblab <= '0.000'.
IF i_stock[] IS INITIAL .
    MESSAGE 'NO Data Available In MSLB Table' TYPE 'S' .
ELSE.
    DELETE i_stock WHERE charg = 'COMMON' .
    IF i_stock[] IS INITIAL .
      MESSAGE 'Already Transfer Posting to Common Batch' TYPE 'S' .
    ENDIF.
ENDIF .
SELECT matnr werks lgort charg clabs
FROM mchb
INTO TABLE i_batch
WHERE matnr IN s_matnr
    AND werks = p_werks .
DELETE i_batch WHERE clabs <= '0.000'.
IF i_batch[] IS INITIAL .
    MESSAGE 'NO Data Available In MCHB Table' TYPE 'S' .
ELSE .
    DELETE i_batch WHERE charg = 'COMMON' .
    IF i_batch[] IS INITIAL .
      MESSAGE 'Already Transfer Posting to Common Batch' TYPE 'S' .
    ENDIF.
ENDIF .
CLEAR : header,code,matdoc .
header-pstng_date = sy-datum.
header-doc_date    = sy-datum.
header-pr_uname    = sy-uname.
header-header_txt = 'Transfer Posting'.
code-gm_code       = '04'.
SORT i_batch BY matnr werks charg.
LOOP AT i_batch.
    CLEAR: item[],item.
    item-material        = i_batch-matnr.
    item-plant           = i_batch-werks.
    item-batch           = i_batch-charg.
    item-entry_qnt       = i_batch-clabs .
    item-stge_loc        = i_batch-lgort .
    item-move_type       = '309'.
    item-move_batch = 'COMMON'.
    APPEND item .
    CLEAR item .
    match = 'X'.
    PERFORM bapi_run USING match.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT i_stock .
    CLEAR: item[],item.
    item-material        = i_stock-matnr.
    item-plant           = i_stock-werks.
    item-batch           = i_stock-charg.
    item-vendor          = i_stock-lifnr .
    item-entry_qnt       = i_stock-lblab .
    item-move_type       = '309'.
    item-spec_stock      = 'O'.
    item-move_batch = 'COMMON'.
    APPEND item .
    CLEAR item .
    match = 'Y'.
    PERFORM bapi_run USING match.
ENDLOOP.
IF i_stock[] IS NOT INITIAL OR i_batch[] IS NOT INITIAL .
    IF it_mess[] IS INITIAL.
      MESSAGE 'Transfer Posted Successfully' TYPE 'S' .
    ELSE.
      SORT it_mess BY charg err.
      WRITE:/2 'Batch',11'Location',20'Vendor'.
      LOOP AT it_mess.
        AT NEW charg.
          SKIP.
        ENDAT.
        IF it_mess-flag = 'X'.
          WRITE: /2 it_mess-charg COLOR 6, it_mess-lgort COLOR 3
                 INTENSIFIED OFF,it_mess-lifnr COLOR 2 INTENSIFIED OFF.
        ENDIF.
        WRITE: /10 it_mess-err.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF .
*&      Form bapi_run
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
FORM bapi_run USING match .
CLEAR: i_return[],i_return.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'
    EXPORTING
      goodsmvt_header = header
      goodsmvt_code   = code
    TABLES
      goodsmvt_item   = item
      return          = i_return.
IF i_return[] IS INITIAL.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
      EXPORTING
        wait = 'X'.
ELSEIF i_return[] IS NOT INITIAL.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK'.
    LOOP AT i_return WHERE type = 'E'.
      it_mess-charg = i_stock-charg.
      IF match = 'X'.
        it_mess-lgort = i_batch-lgort.
      ELSEIF match = 'Y'.
        it_mess-lifnr = i_stock-lifnr.
      ENDIF.
      it_mess-err   = i_return-message.
      IF sy-tabix = 1.
        it_mess-flag = 'X'.
      ENDIF.
      APPEND it_mess.
      CLEAR it_mess.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    " bapi_run
Regards,
S.C.K

Transfer post

Dear All,
Inconsistencies have been noticed in the unit of measurement in the existing material masters. Also, migration of the numeric numbers into the new alpha numeric numbers are required so as to enable correct determination of re order level. If the unit of measurement is different (as it needs to be corrected) between new and old material masters, how the migration/ stock transfer vide movement type 309 be done?
Rgt
kt

Hi Koluthugan,
I can suggest you one way out for it.
You can add alternative unit of measurement in old material master.
While doing transfer posting using 309 mov type you have to change unit of entry as per change UOM in new material master.
So your existing inventory will be calucated as per new altnative UOM tranfer of M to M should not creat a problem.
Thanks and regards
Gitesh

Material to Material transfer with movement type 321

Dear Experts,
Material to material transfer with movement type 309, the system create a price difference account if price control "S"
but we transfer material to material with movement 321 (quality ), no price didderence account is generated, system showing different document
Exp--- Material "A" with STD price 150
Material "B" with STD price 100
document is created
Material A A/c. Credit 100
Material B A/c. Dr. 150
My question is, the price difference where is adjusting, is finance and costing books of account will effect.
Kindly help to solve the issue
Thanks & Regards,

Dear Wasim,
321 movement is to transfer the stock of a material lying in quality to unrestricted stock.
It's not used for material to material transfer.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Transfer posting of split valuated materials

Hi guys,
During transfer posting (mvt type 311,313 and 315 )of split valuated materials valuvation type should not be changed by user , please suggest how to do this?
thanks and regards
Thamizhchelvan G

I am curious.
Is you material batch managed or do you use split valuation without batch management?
What happens if the user changes the valuation type? I expect a warning or even an error message.
do you get accoutning documents then?

Auto print of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents by Movement type

Hi,
We have created two different output types to print the layout's of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents.
The requirement is to default the message in the document by movement type (key combination)
Meaning if it is 201 it should populate GI output type
If it is 313 it should populate TP output type.
we do not have any standard key combination (NACR) by movement type wise.
Any alternative way of meeting this requirement?
Thanks
Regards
Ram

Hello Kevin,
I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
Kind regards,
Bart

Posting with MM Movement Type 309 material to material: Error in WM

Hello,
i post an MM-Movement type (Bewegungsart) 309 (material to material).
The MM-goods movement works, but then in warehouse mangagement there is a problem:
The creation of the transfer order (Transportauftrag) stops in many cases.
The aim is to post Material A to the same storage bin in Warehouse Management where Material B was before.
I programmed this in user-exit (ZXLToU03) that by movement type 309, always taking same storage bin. But then I often get the error: transfer order could not be created. Then I have to do the creation of tranfer order in foreground and then I get an error like this:
capacity of the bin location is not enough.
The Problem is that I do a posting for example:
001 010101 to 922 Umbuchungzone --> Transfer order Pos 1
922 Umbuchungszone to 001 010101 --> Transfer order Pos 2.
And so the first transfer order position is not confirmed when I do the transfer order Pos 2.
How can I confirm Pos 1 by batch-input? The Programm to do 309 should posting 1000 materials in one step. But in Warehouse management I get those problems?
Is it possible to increase the capacitiy of the storage bin and then decrease it after creation of transfer order(where can I do this and when)???
I hope anybody can help me.
Thanks.

Hello Kevin,
I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
Kind regards,
Bart

Transfer posting movt type 309

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for