Transfer posting of split valuated materials

Hi guys,
During transfer posting (mvt type 311,313 and 315 )of split valuated materials valuvation type should not be changed by user , please suggest how to do this?
thanks and regards
Thamizhchelvan G

I am curious.
Is you material batch managed or do you use split valuation without batch management?
What happens if the user changes the valuation type? I expect a warning or even an error message.
do you get accoutning documents then?

Similar Messages

Inforecord for Split valuated materials

Hi all,
How can i maintain different prices for split valuated materials
For Eg. I have a material split valuated based on its Quality vendor supplies two diff quality materials with different prices
how to maintain the prices in inforecords or any alternative to maintain both the prices.
With regards,
Krishna

hi..
Split valuation is for Valuation Purpose only...
SAP does not support....Procuring same material with Diff. Split Valuation Type from Single Vendor is not allowed by SAP standard..
You cannot Maintain Purchase Info for Material which is having 2 Split Valuation type......with One Vendor......
Because For One vendor and One material combination, you can maintain One split valuation type only....
Hope it works..
Thanks..

Stock transfer between plants for split valuated materials

Hi,
I'm doing a stock transfer between plants without STO.
The FG's are split valuated,which are transferred from central warehouse to other warehouse at different states.
I'm trying to use mvt type 303 and 305 to transfer the FG.
But getting error "Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation".
Please suggest how to achieve the requirement.
Is it possible to make 303 mvt type document to be parked and posted.
Regards,
Venkatesh

<< Moderator message - Cut and paste response from Error when doing two step transfer between Plants with split valuation removed and points unassigned. Plagiarism is not allowed in SCN >>
Refer below link with same issue discussed,
[two step transfer with split valuation |Canu00B4t use two step transfer with split valuation ?]
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 3, 2012 11:30 AM

Vendor Consignment for Split Valuated Materials

Dear All,
We have a scenario where in our material is split valuated,we have 2 valuation type import and Domestic, both the valuation type is being supplied by a single distributor, the price of the import valuation type is different from the price of domestic valuation type.
We are trying to configure consiginment process for split valuted material.While maintianing consignment info record, we are not able to maintian separate info record for import and domestic valuation type (since material /vendor/plant/purchase organization are same).Hence while doing goods issue using 201 K, the system is taking the price from the info record.Is there any solution available, to post the goods issue for import valuation type at a different price and domestic valuation type at different price.
Thanks,
Vairavan.

How system will pick the info record price for movement type 201 K ?
As of my knowledge, system will create accounting entry as per the material price (MM03 - Accounting 1 view for the valuation type)
It may create problem for 411 K movement type, but not for movement type 201 K.
If you need to pick different price as per valuation type, then you can do this via condition table.
Have a look into the discussion Info record Price on the basis of Valuation type

MR21 price changes for split valuation materials

HI
I have changed the material price for the material whcih are maintained with split valuation ie. in MR21 i could able to change the price for valuation types only.. i'm not able to change the main material price , its asking to enter the val type?? how to change the the price ?
Ex . Mat code : MAT 123, having val types as IN and OV, which has price control of S, here i have changed the price for the val types IN & OV, but i'm not able to change the price for the main material MAT123, which has price control V?? how to change it

hi Samuel,
We have a similar case, need your help;
Case: Split valuation is activated but parent has price control "V" and child i.e. diff valuation types have "S". We want to make std prices of all valuation types "0". It is done but the parent still shows value in MAP.
a. How do we make MAP of parent as "0" (price control "V")
b. Will it impact and how e.g. MB5L
c. Is it ok if we ignore the valuation of parent
d. All valuation types under parent are made "0"
Thx
Bhushan

Estimate Cost on Split Valuation Materials

Dear Experts,
We have split valuation on MM for almost 2 years. But we have since then the following problem:
We have this split valuations:
For finished products (FERT) we have 01 and 02 for valuation types
For semi-finished products (HALB) we have 03 and 04 for valuation type
The problem is that when we try to calculate the estimated cost with CK11N and CK40N, the cost only is assigned to the material itself but not to the valuation types. I don't know if I made myself clear, this is an example:
*Material * ----- root ------ valuation type 1 ----- valuation type 2
Cost -------- X -------------- no ------------- no
With this we are force to use Tx. MR21 to asign cost.
Please anyone help.
Javier Sandoval Vera
Ecuador
Edited by: Javier Sandoval on Apr 1, 2009 10:56 PM
Edited by: Javier Sandoval on Apr 1, 2009 10:57 PM

HI,
When you run the cost estimate, only the base material price will get updated.. you cannot expect the price of valuation types to get updated..
because the valuation type prices will be changing as per the wish of the plant....
karthick

Canu00B4t use two step transfer with split valuation ?

Hi people , i´ve activated split valuation for MaterialX , it has two Valuation types ( Production and Purchase ) . The problem arose when i tried to do a two step transfer between plants ( mov 303 ) and i got the following error msg :
Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation
Message no. M7048
Diagnosis
In the receiving plant, the material is subject to split valuation. For this material, a stock transfer cannot be carried out using the two-step procedure.
Procedure
Use the one-step procedure (movement type 301) or a stock transfer order for the stock transfer.
The message is very clear itself , but... i just wonder if there`s actually any way to avoid this, considering that having to create a transfer order for each movement will duplicate work and using a one step transfer won´t be practical. I tried to change the error msg into a warning but couldn´t find it in customizing. Thanks for any comments on this !

First of all , thanks everyone for the help.
Csaba Szommer, Kunal ingale , i read the OSS note and the pdf and indeed everything confirms it´s not possible to do the two step movement. So , i tried the stock transport order and something else appeared here. When creating this type of order , the system first ask for a Supplying Plant , then you can populate the material , quantity and the destination plant. But then it asks for the Valuation Type of the material involved, and it seems this field is Mandatory . Is it possible to make this field on the transport order as optional ? I couldn´t find this field at SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Define Screen Layout at Document Level .
I need this field to be optional for the following reason. In my company there´s a relation between two plants , Plant A ( from where products are dispatched to the customer ) and Plant B ( where the material is produced with valuation type "Production" and sometimes is buyed from vendors with valuation type "Purchase" ) . The idea is to run an MRP which will generate the material needs on Plant A considering the Sales Orders. This need will be then transformed (automatically by MRP ) in Stock Transport Orders with Supplying Plant "Plant B" and receiving "Plant A". The problem here is that , at the moment of the transport order creation it´s no possible to know which will be the valuation type of the material that will satisfy the need. I mean , Plant B ( production and buying plant ) will check the list of needs for Plant A and then will decide which material ( with which Valuation Type ) they will provide considering the actual stock levels at the time of the MRP run.
In a few words, i see the only way to do a two step transfer of a split valuated material is using Stock Transport Orders , is there a way to make the field "Valuation Type" optional ?. The idea would be to choose the Valuation Type of the material at the moment of the Good Issue. Thanks a lot , once again.
Edited by: Christian Len on Jul 7, 2008 3:16 PM

Transfer Posting Issue through MB1B

Hi,
We have a requirement that During Transfer Posting of Material through MB1B transaction, User should be able to transfer the Stock within SAME Material Code (From Material A to Material A, but in diff. Plant)...
If User want to Transfer the Stock of A Material to B Material, system should not allow the same...
Please guide...

SAP~MM wrote:
> But If, we want to Transfer the Stock to another Plant with same material code, then by which movement type we can do it..
>
> Please guide...
MVMT type : 301 Transfer posting plant to plant in one step
The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to unrestricted-use stock in the receiving plant.
Possible special stock indicators: O, V, W
MVMT type : 303 Transfer posting plant to plant in two steps - removal from storage
The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant to stock in transfer in the receiving plant.
For technical reasons, you cannot carry out transfer postings from plant to plant in two steps for split-valuation materials.
Removal from storage can be posted via an SD delivery.

Physical inventory document creation for split valuated material

Hi
We are doing stock count in our company. We are using split valuation for some of the materials. When I tried to create a PID for split valuated material which are not in stock, system issued a standard error message. What I understood from that error message, we can create a PID for split valuated materials which are in stock. Is it so? If so, then how can we count split valuated material?
Let me know if you need any info.
Thanks in advance..
Jeny...

Please refer to SAP note 30254 and it should help.
Symptom
If you create a physical inventory document for a material in a storage
location without existing storage location segment, error message M7006
is displayed: 'Material & (material number) & (plant) & (storage
location) does not exist'. Thus, a storage location segment is not
created automatically for this material.
The same also applies to the batch segment. The batch segment is also
not created automatically but, if a batch is specified for a material
when creating a physical inventory document, that is not yet created for
this material, error message M7042 is generated: 'Batch & & & & does not
exist'.
The same applies to the special stock segments which are also not
created automatically. Different error messages are generated here
depending on the special stock (see also Note 64448).
Additional key words
MI01, MI09, MI10, M7076, M7183, M7184, M7185, MARD, MCHA, MCHB, MSKA,
MKOL, MSKU, MSPR, MSLB
Cause and prerequisites
If no storage location segment or batch segment or special stock segment
exists to a material, this then means that a goods movement did never
occur before in the system to this material (batch) to this storage
location (special stock), that is that the material (batch) never had a
stock to this storage location (special stock) in the system before and
that it was never posted before on this segment. It is therefore not
possible to carry out a physical inventory for such a material (batch).
It is different, if a goods movement has already occurred to a material
(batch) to this segment and if only the present stock is zero. A
physical inventory is then necessary and also feasible for this material
(batch) since the different segments are not deleted automatically in
the moment in which the stock becomes zero.
Solution
For a material for that no storage location segment, batch segment or
special stock segment exists, it is not necessary, to carry out a
physical inventory on this storage location or for this batch or this
special stock. If, however, a quantity is physically found to such a
material, the corresponding segment must be created before the physical
inventory.
There are 3 options to create storage location data:
       - maintain the 'Storage' view in the material master for the
          material and storage location or
                                                                  Page 2
       - use the 'Enter storage locations' function in the material
          master or
       - post the first goods receipt (providing, the automatic
          creation of storage location data is permitted in the plant
          and for the movement type).
There are 2 options to create batch data}:
       - create the batches in the material master manually via
          function 'Create batch'.
       - post the first goods receipt for the batches to the respective
          material.
You can only post the various special stock segments via posting a goods
receipt. An exception is special stock 'K' (vendor consignment). You
must define a consignment price in the material master for this special
stock using the 'Create vendor consignment' function before a goods
receipt can be posted for this special stock.

Split valuation Cost estimate

What is the impact when we execute cost estimate using Split valuation materials ?

Std cost estiatme would impact the Split valuation which would have the material with "S" Standard price to update the price when you release std cost estimate.

Split valuation for non-valuated materials

Hi dudes,
We are implementing SAP for our Subcontractor.
our SC receive all components from our company ( on free ) but sometimes they purchase the same material themselves for other uses. so we decided to use split valuation to separate valuated and non-valuated materials.
I did configuration and created 2 valuation type ( valuated - nonvaluated )
when I create Purchase order it askes for valuation type but even when I use non-valuation type in PO it asks for price!!!!
do any of you have used split valuation for this target?
have the same problem?
what should I do actually??

Hi,
Is someone in the subcontracting plant going to do a process order on the materials you send them? Or are you only going to track the finished inventory once it reaches your plant?
In the first case:
1) Create a STO to the SC plant. This stock will have to be priced.
2) Inventory reaches SC plant. They perform production process.
3) finished inventory is sent using another STO.
2nd Case:
1) Create a SC vendor using the SC plant as a vendor.
2) Create a SC PO to this vendor using this vendor and transfer goods to him. In this case, goods are transferred for 'free' as they really belong to you and not to the SC
3) Once the production process is over and the finished product is sent back to you, do a GR. The raw material sent to the SC will be consumed.

Error when doing two step transfer between Plants with split valuation

Hi expert,
I´ve activated split valuation for Material X , it has three Valuation types ( NEW, REPAIR and DAMAGE ) . The problem arose when i tried to do a two step transfer between plants ( mov 303 ) and i got the following error msg :
Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation
Message no. M7048
Diagnosis
In the receiving plant, the material is subject to split valuation. For this material, a stock transfer cannot be carried out using the two-step procedure.
Procedure
Use the one-step procedure (movement type 301) or a stock transfer order for the stock transfer.
The message is very clear itself , but... i just wonder if there`s actually any way to avoid this, I tried to change the error msg into a warning but couldn´t find it in customizing. Thanks for any comments on this !

Hi,
What do you mean with "inconcistent to my storage type definition?", is that mean i can process two step transfer without using PO/delivery process or one-step movement? coz according to business requirement, we must use two step transfer considering to the distance between plants is so far and we want to make it the simple way so that PO/Delivery process isn't better solution. I think, this is an standard procedure all company over the world can use but just the reason of split valuation the system can't execute the transaction.
Is there any config i miss to? is there any user exit i can use for this requirement? please help me..
thanks,
AJ

Transfer posting field Valuation type

HI, I´m doing a transfer posting in reference to a reservation or to others, and I need that when I complete the field Valuation Type in From (from which storage location), this field should automatically completed in Destination. This should be working the same way as when I enter the material number, that I press enter and the information of FROM is copied to Destination.
Thank you
Sofia

Rajesh,
Thank you very much for your answer. It was trying to do this for 933,934,935 and 936. But don´t worry about it because I had solved it. I changed the configuration of the field UMBAR in:
Materials Management
Inventory Management and Physical Inventory
Settings for Enjoy Transactions
Settings for Goods Movements (MIGO)
Field Selection per Mvt Type
The field was a required entry and I changed to Optional entry.

Split Valuation of Materials for which Purchase Order exists.

Hi,
I want to do the split valuation of materials for which Purchase Order already exists and GR has taken Place.
Is there any way to do it?
Regards,
B P Singh

Hi,
Yes, you can.
Please start transaction MM02 and set the valuation category > you will get an error message > click on 'Display Errors' button and SAP will say what hinders you from the change.
- you should set the stock level of your material in previous and current period to 0 (it is possible with posting date in the past; MB1A201 > after material master settings you can set back the stock level via MB1A202)
- delete transactional data (including your PO)
- mark batch records with DF and archive them
- etc
BR
Csaba

Cost component split transfer for Profit center valuation in ke27

Dear All,
We have activated multiple valuation/transfer prices. Material ledger is also activated.
We want to transfer cost component split to CO-PA by ke27.
We have defined separate costing keys for access to actual cost estimate for legal and profit center valuations.
But cost component split transfer to COPA works only for legal valution. Even we have defined type of valution for profit center costing key -transfer cost component split and total costs.
What should be else customized to transfer cost components splitting in profit center valuation to CO-PA from actual cost estimates?
With best regards,
Kamila.

Hi,
I have assigned the same value fields used for legal valuation to column 2, which was pointed in message.
But now I got following message in ke27:
For actual data, value fields that were already populated before CO-PA valuation cannot be changed in valuation.
1. As a rule, value fields that were filled before CO-PA valuation - be it from SD or by a manual entry of a line item - can only be changed by means of user exits.
(Note that for plan data, CO-PA valuation always has priority over the values planned manually.)
2. The valuation steps in a CO-PA valuation strategy are numbered sequentially. These numbers determine the order in which the steps are carried out within that strategy. As a rule, value fields populated in one step can be used as a basis for calculating values for other value fields in a subsequent step.
Value fields that were populated in a previous step are generally not overwritten by subsequent steps.
The exception to this are steps that use a CO-PA user exit. User exits let you change individual value fields.
3. If you valuate using multiple material cost estimates simultaneously, this means that the values of different cost components within the same cost estimate are aggregated and then entered in one CO-PA value field. However, value fields that already contain data from a previous cost estimate are not overwritten by a later cost estimate. Consequently, you should assign value fields in Customizing so that the values of different cost estimates are entered in different sets of value fields.
4. When condition values are transferred to CO-PA value fields, note that condition types that are assigned to the same value field are added together. This is also the case when the condition types come from different costing sheets within the valuation strategy.
So does it mean we should define separate value fields for PC valuation?
With best regards,
Kamila.

Transfer posting of split valuated materials

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for