Transfer Postings

Hi Experts...
I have the following requirement:
My client has created a Balance Sheet GL without activating the open item management in GL Master.  And posted some documents to that GL also.  While scrutiny the problem was found.  Now i want to activate open item management.  For this I have suggested them to create new GL with same parameter + activating the Open Item Management.  Now i want the transactions posted to the wrong account to be transferred to the new gl account.
Need your valuable inputs on this...
Thanks
Kiran

Hello
We transfer GL account balance from one GL a/c to another GL a/c in the following situations.
When the GL a/c need to be maintained in Open item Management, say GL a/c belongs to a Balance sheet item but you have forgot to check the Open Item Management check box and made entries to that particular GL a/c.
In this situation you can’t activate the Open item Management when the A/C is having balance, so first u need to make the GL a/c zero balance and than check Open item Management check box, follow the following steps.
Create another dummy GL a/c, say ABC and the GL a/c which you want to make zero balance is having Dr Balance. Now make a posting using FB50 or F-02, you Dr the ABC GL a/c and Cr the other GL a/c so that the GL a/c balance becomes zero, now go to GL master and check the Open item Management check box. And again make posting through F-02 Crediting the ABC GL a/c and Debiting the other GL a/c.
Reg

Similar Messages

  • Material Ledger for Stock Transfer Postings

    Hi All,
    I have a question about the way material ledger is calculated for stock transfer postings (movement type 641). I will give an example to illustrate this issue:
    Material A has a Standard cost of $10
    Material B has a Standard cost of $8
    During the month 100 units were transferred from material A to Material B. This created a financial posting as follows:
    Credit Material A -          $1000                               
    Debit Material B -           $800
    Debit Price Difference    $200
    This price difference of $200 was used in the calculation of Actual cost for material B
    However, the Actual Cost for Material A was $9. I would have expected the system to use this actual cost to calculate the difference to be posted to material B. Hence the difference used in Material B should have been $100 {(9 – 8) X 100} and not $200.
    Has anyone had a similar issue, or know how the system resolves this (if at all)?
    Points will be rewarded for relevance.
    Thanks

    Dave, I see that your process is slightly different to mine. We do not revalue inventory at month end, instead the material ledger program posts the revalued amount to a reserve account and the actual cost is only a statistical entry. The material ledger calculation is reversed automatically in the new month and the standard price is used for valuation.
    I think this might make it difficult for the system to value STO's at actual. I may need to check with SAP.
    Thanks

  • Inspection lot on transfer postings

    Hi colleagues,
    I would like to know your opinion about a problem that I don't know how to solve.
    Is it possible to create an automatic inspection lot on transfer postings between different storage locations?
    By the moment, we're creating the automatic inspection lots when we do the goods receipt from the purchase order. For this purpose we're working with Inspection type 01 on the material master (quality management view). Due to a special requirement we are not going to create the inspection lot on the goods receipt but when the goods are transferred to another stroage location.
    I've changed the Inspection type on the material master from 01 to 08 - Stock transfer inspection, but nothing happens (no inspection lot created) when a transfer posting with 311 movement type is done.
    Thanks very much in advance and good luck,
    J

    Hi
    Precisly 08 inpsection type has been defined for the same.
    I presume that you are doing stock posting through MB1B/MIGO t code & 311 mvt type
    Now if you have activated 08 inspection type it will create a Stock relevent Inspection lot with 08,whenever you are transfering material from one storage location to other.
    Check the following setting
    Qcc0->Quality Inspection->Inspection lot creation>Inspection for goods mvt->Deactivate Quality Inspection for a Movement Type--> check here whether for 311 QM mvt is deactivated here
    I hope this will add some value
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Material to material transfer postings within QI

    We have a requirement to perform material-to-material transfers within the QI stock type (e.g., 323, but with receiving material open). I don't see any movement type for this. Is there any reason why this should not be allowed?

    Hi
    For some reason I woke up this morning with the answer to this problem and I have tested it and it works.
    I made a copy of movement types 323 and 325 which are sloc to sloc transfers for stock on 'Q' or 'S' which is quality or blocked.
    I made these new movement typpes 923 and 925.
    I them went in to the individual movement types in omjj and in the section ' Foeld selection (from 201) Batch search procedure click on the magnifying glass and you will see a list of headings. In the one called Transfer Postings double click and then make the receiving material either optional or required as it is suppressed at the moment. Then when you do either MIGO or MB1B with these movement types not only will they select either Q or blocked stock depending on the  movement type but the receiving material number is available for populating
    hey presto problem solved, I feel that I am quite sad waking up with answers to SAP issues but hey ho such is the life of a consultant.
    Final point make sure that Finance are happy as there will be a change in valuation of stock.
    Cheers

  • RESERVED QUANTITY'S SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TRANSFER POSTINGS

    Dear Gurus,
    Reserved quantity's should not be considered for Transfer postings to subcontractor or Stock transfers.
    Example:  Material  XYZ    Total Stock =  1200 nos.

    as per standard SAP reservation quantity will not stop the goods issue. resevation has no control on stock issue.
    Try with abap development.

  • RESERVATION QUANTITY SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TRANSFER POSTINGS

    Dear Gurus,
    Reservation Quantity should not be considered for Stock Transfers or Transfer postings to Sub contractor.
    movement type : 541 & 641
    Example :  Total Stock = 1200 nos.        Reserved stock for production order = 1000 nos.
    Currently our system allows stock transfers/transfer postings for reserved quantity also.
    But we want the reserved quantity to be blocked and only free stock should be allowed for transfer postings.
    (i.e  1200 - 1000 = 200 nos  .     Only 200 nos should be allowed for transfer postings)
    Please suggest.

    as per standard SAP reservation quantity will not stop the goods issue. resevation has no control on stock issue.
    Try with abap development.

  • Valuation of subsequent Transfer Postings with Movement Type - 412 Q

    Hi,
    We are procuring raw material by raising Purchase order (without account assignment) and receiving it as unrestricted stock i.e. Plant stock.
    Whenever the material is required for a particular WBS element, then we are transferring the Plant stock to Project stock with Movement type 412 Q. That special stock is being used for Production orders which are created wrt that WBS element.
    Current valuation of Transfer posting with Movement type 412 Q is as follows.
    1. When we transfer the Plant stock to Project stock for the first time then System is valuating that stock at the Moving average price of raw material say Rs.50.
    2.After transfer posting, values are being updated in the Table QBEW as well as in the Report MBBS wrt Plant, Material and WBS element i.e Rs.50.
    3. Again, when we transfer the Plant stock of same material to Project stock for the same WBS element system is valuating the Project stock at Rs.50 instead of at the Moving average price of that material which is Rs.70 at that moment.
    So what we understand is that the system is valuating the further goods movements of that material (Project stock) is at the price of Rs.50 which was stored in QBEW table (which was updated at the first goods movement).
    So all consumption of that material (Project stock) is valuating at Rs.50, which is not resembling the Moving average price.
    Is there anyway to valuate the subsequent transfer postings of Plant stock to Project stock with the moving average price valid at that moment instead at the the price which is updated in QBEW table for the first goods movement?
    We can change through MR21, but it is not practically feasible to change the price at each and every time for Plant, WBS element and material. combination.
    Thanks & Regards
    Madhusekhar Gupta G

    Please read the explanation about the design with 412 Q movement  in OSS Note 180503 - Val. logic during transfer posting with reversal movem. type

  • Profit transfer postings aren't showing in transaction fmb_pt01

    We are running ECC 6.0 and are looking for a budget/actual report other than FMAVCR01.  FMB_PT01 looks promising but the report excludes value type 66 - Profit Transfer Postings in the summary.  How do I go about including this value type in the report?
    Update: Looking at the text symbols in program RFFMREP_LDB_PT01, I see that symbols 001 - Budget, 004 - Invoice, 005 - Bud-Inv, 006 - Open Items and 007 - Residual Budget are present in the report.  What I am looking for is symbol 002 - Payment.

    Hi, Thomas,
    Based on what you described, yes, PBET is on. With update profile 102 that report will lump value type 66 to invoice column (we are using 102 too and I verified it by drilling down in the invoice column).
    Please compare update profile 101 with 102 in table FMUP01. With 101, VT54 - invoice is in the midle of the 'chain' (the reduction update indicator) while VT57 and 66 are both at the end of the 'chain'. With 102 VT 54 and 66 are both at the end of the 'chain', no payment update.
    Regards,
    Ming

  • Auto TO for transfer postings

    Hello,
    Could any one suggest how to create auto TO and TO confirmation for transfer postings.
    regards
    rk

    check at this node
    SPRO: Logistics Execution > Warehouse mangement > Activities > Transfers > Set  Up Atom. TO creation
    and check at this node also
    SPRO: Logistic Execution > Warehouse  Management > Interfaces > Inventory management > Activate Auto TO creation

  • Material to material transfer postings

    Dear friends,
    Is it neccesary that for material to material transfer postings (309) serial no. profile should also be same??? If it differs how can I go for 309??
    Pls reply.
    Amar

    Hi amar,
    you can do same serial number material in 309 but when error will come click proceed and remove serial no after saving doc add serial no in material master.
    this is the way only possible.it is correct way or not i dont know.
    actually system wont accept serial no is defferent.because trasfer posting material to material is we are replacing material form old to new material if you have different serial nos how will possible replacement.this is the reason not accepting system
    Prem

  • Transfer postings to PCA.

    Hi all
    In profit center accounting, I'm facing a problem with transfer of payables and receivables.
    I've run the steps F.5D and 1KEK to transfer the data, but there are 4 items related to a sales order which are balancing to zero in GL but not in PCA. There's a balance of $1200 in PCA.
    The items are posted to pca, but not transferred.
    I've tried to re run the data transfer steps, but that wouldn't help.
    Is there anyway that I correct pca postings through repostings etc.. Can somebody help?
    Many thanks

    Thanks for the answer Dave, but can you pls eloborate on this?
    What excatly does this transaction do?
    I've tried using the 9KE0 and posted the difference amount to the specific profit center & gl account. It wouldn't post it until the balance is zero, so I posted two line items(Dr & Cr). I, then tried the KE5T to check the comparisons, the difference is still there.
    Have I done the correct thing? Please would you explain this further..?
    Thanks a lot
    Shiv

  • Inventory Transfer Postings

    Dear Sir/ Madam
    I choose set G/L Accounts by Warehouse Wise for some items as well as Item Group wise for some Items. When I Go to inventory Transfer for those items which are wear house wise mapped the stock accounts given to warehouse get affected.
        Can I choose accounts as per clientu2019s requirement in inventory transfer transaction?
    Different stock accounts for different items which are mapped as warehouse wise

    hi,
    Choose any one of it either item group / warehouse but not both.
    It will difficult to analyze journal postings when u choose both & cause problems in taking reports.
    Configure g/l acct's according to business requirement..
    In stock transfer to warehouse get debited,from warehouse get credited,both of them are stock accounts.
    Jeyakanthan

  • Error While Entering Transfer Postings

    Hello Friends,
    When i try to enter transfter postings, click on TO  PURCHASE ORDER  push button, i am getting error " NUMBER RANGE FOR TRANS/EVENT  WA IN THE YEAR 2012 DOES NOT EXIST", can any one pls help me how to rectify this error .
    Thanks
    Krish
    Moderator message:
    Locked. Please try to search for answer before posting.
    Please also read the forum rules and guidelines.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Feb 19, 2012 4:20 PM

    Hi,
    Use tcode OMBT click on the groups button, select the
    Material documents for goods movements and inventory diffs.
    WA  and maintain number range for WA for 2012
    Regards
    Kailas ugale

  • S_ALR_87012360 : Transfer postings for diferred taxes

    Hi,
    When i run Tcode S_ALR_87012360 The taxe of some postings is not transfered, the system shows this error :
    Code error 2
    The document contains items whose posting key is marked as payment
    Please can you explain me the signification of this message and how to solve it ?
    Regards
    Edited by: jehade el aoumari on Oct 27, 2008 8:22 AM
    Edited by: jehade el aoumari on Oct 27, 2008 10:33 AM

    Hi,
    It is not so, you can run this report any number of time.
    You might have missed to input any field. Kindly check that batch generated or not.
    What error you are getting, kindly let us know.
    Regards,
    Shayam

  • Transfer Postings function in F-54

    Hi friends,
    Can someone please tell me if I need to enter the amount in the "Transfer posting" column each time I clear through F-54.
    What does that column do? I am not clear about its functionality.
    even if I do not enter the amount and post for clearing system still allows me to clear from F-54 but I have to go to vendor then and clear that posting manually.
    Please let me know if you have an idea.
    null

    Hi
    Instead of posting it to the vendor recon account and later transfering the entry Spl GL recon a/c you can try this.
    In FBCJ.
    Pass the debit to a clearing account(marked as opn item)
    later pass another entey crediting clearing account and debiting Spl GL recon account.
    if you want to use the same logic of your or the above.
    Use posting key which allows Spl GL acccout 19,39,09,29 and give account number & the Spl gl indicator and pass the entry; try generic screens like f-02,f-65 etc.
    Revert if not solved or assigen points.
    Thanks,
    Sujai C

  • F-04 ( Transfer Postings ) - Reg

    Hi gurus
    this is ramki
    Advance Payments through Cash
    The FBCJ is not permitting to post Spl Gl transactions for Vendors, if iam post that Spl Gl as normal item in FBCJ, how  can i  transfer the entry from normal reconciliation account to Spl Gl Recon A/c in F-04 as Vendor wise or else.
    I have tried that F-04 as Vendor wise , it is working , but it is very difficult to post entries as Vendor wise , is there any option to transfer the entries from Normal Recon Acct to Spl GL Recon Acct for a huge no.of Vendors
    with regards
    ramki

    Hi
    Instead of posting it to the vendor recon account and later transfering the entry Spl GL recon a/c you can try this.
    In FBCJ.
    Pass the debit to a clearing account(marked as opn item)
    later pass another entey crediting clearing account and debiting Spl GL recon account.
    if you want to use the same logic of your or the above.
    Use posting key which allows Spl GL acccout 19,39,09,29 and give account number & the Spl gl indicator and pass the entry; try generic screens like f-02,f-65 etc.
    Revert if not solved or assigen points.
    Thanks,
    Sujai C

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with an Receiver Idoc adapter

    Hi. We have just went from XI 3.0 to PI.7.10. The Receiver idoc adapter is set up in the same way as it was in XI. The problem is when two different interfaces runs at the same time I got data into the DC40-record which not belongs too this idoc but

  • Problem with importing a java export on SQLSERVER 2005

    We are trying to import a java export for a system refresh.   The SAPINSTgets too step 31 of 32, run java migration toolkit, and then fails  with the following error. invalid object name "J2EE_CONFIG"   This is showing up in the runJmt.log. com.sap.e

  • Session state - Whats the big deal?

    What is the equivalent of HTMLDB's "session state" in other peer environments, like, for instance, ASP/ASPX pages? There, you would just define a bunch of variables and use those on the page, right? How does the fact that HTMLDB's "variables" are sto

  • Can I stream through my Apple TV from my Android phone?

    CCan I stream from my Android phone to my Apple TV

  • Data download error question

    Using iTunes on PC windows 7.  Many album covers don't load when viewing iTunes Storefront; and when I try to download, I get an error 408.  Diagnostics show no problems.