Transfer requirement items to be processed still exist. message no. L3 449

Hi gurus
i have the error during saving the Partial TO , error like "Transfer requirement items to be processed still exist.
message no. L3 449 ". kindly suggest me , where i made mistake
with regards
DINESH KUMAR

Hi JURGEN,
whatever you told ,I followed and Activated partial picking for shipping.... but that is for SD module transaction.. i talking about Partial transfer order of goods issue against production order....
If you have difficult to understand my queries means, kindly send me your personal mail id. i will the screen shots to your mail id.
THANKS YOU FOR UR SUPPORT
With Regards
DINESH
Edited by: code acess on Dec 15, 2011 5:27 AM
Edited by: code acess on Dec 15, 2011 5:47 AM
Edited by: code acess on Dec 15, 2011 6:12 AM

Similar Messages

SAP WM-PP: Spit transfer requirements

Hello,
We are working in a WM-PP scenario with transfer requirements and transfer orders.
For one process we need to use the "2 step picking" functionality of the SAP system.
In the release of the production order, the system is creating the transfer requirements. SAP is creating one transfer requirement per operation, with many items, one item for each component in the operation.
This is the problem, instead of one "big" transfer requirement with many items, we need to have many transfer requirements. This is because for the "2 step picking" process we need to have more than one "transfer requirement group" for the components of one production order operation.
The problem is that the "transfer requirement groups" can group "transfer requirements", no "transfer requirement items". If one transfer requirement is in the group, all its item with 2 step picking belong to the group.
Summing up, we need a way of splitting transfer requirement according to our criteria, in order to create several "transfer requirement groups" for the components of one production order operation.
As far as I know, we can only split transfer requirements in one operation according to the destination bin of the component.
Is there any other way of splitting transfer requirements?
Thank you very much for your help.

Hi all,
Thanks for the replies.
@ Jurgen: I have setup mail notifications, but I don't see any messages. It looks like SAP simply does not try to create a transfer order in the first place.
@ Bala: yes this has been checked. Actually I'm part of the project team so any changes would have been done by myself most probably. Anyway, no changes made to this part of the system.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Oliver

Restriction of 32 PDB's on one PE - still exist?

Hi
We are planing to implement MPLS in an Enterprise Environment. On one PE Router all VRF's are routed together over a Firewall. On this PE I'll have more than 28 different OSPF Processes.
Does anybody know if the limitation of 28 separate OSPF processes still exists on a PE according to the Protocol Descriptor Block (PDB)?
I read once that in further IOS releases this issue will be solved, because multiple VRF's share the same process through use of the routing context mechanism.
Cheers
patrick

The original poster might want to try this URL instead as he will probably not be able to access the one you posted:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5207/products_feature_guide09186a00801d2d65.html
Hope this helps,

Transfer Requirement for Goods Receipt Item

Hi All,
We are trying to create Transfer Order for Goods Receipt items using an ITS mobile application.We are using the function module L_TO_CREATE_TR to create Transfer Order by passing the Transfer Requirement from the Goods Receipt as an input to the function module. Our requirement is to create one Transfer Orde per Goods Receipt item. We need to create Transfer Order for the items simulatneously from different terminals.Since we have only one Transfer Requirement for the entire Goods Receipt document, we are not able to create Transfer Orders simultaneously because of the system lock (Transfer Requirement is locked).
Is it possible to create separate Transfer Rquirement for the individual items in the Goods Receipt via customizing/User exit.
Your guidance in this regard will be great help for us.
Regards,
Shaju

Hi Dirk,
Thank you for your reply.
Our enduser will be using handheld device for Transfer Order creation. The user will pick the GR item material from one storage type (902) and the Transfer Requirement will be locked at this moment.Later while placing the SU in destination bin the user will scan the destination bin and the Transfer Order will be created at the time of scanning. Till the completion of the entire process the Transfer Requirement will be locked and no one else can pick the materials of the same GR from 902 storage type.
We are trying to create Transfer Requirements for each Goods Receipt Item and we are not able to find any user exit in Goods Receipt Creation or any customizing option.
Can you please check and help us to resolve the same.
Regards,
Shaju
Edited by: shaju tv on Apr 5, 2010 11:40 AM

TS1389 I can't transfer purchase item,every time i tune asks me to authorize the PC and when i authorize, i tune says , this is one pc out of your 5 pc. I followed everty step mentioned in this article but still it does not work.

I can't transfer purchase item,every time i tune asks me to authorize the PC and when i authorize, i tune says , this is one pc out of your 5 pc. I followed everty step mentioned in this article but still it does not work

I am having the same problem for one song. I've tried deauthorizing and then authorizing the computer but it doesn't work. I can play the song on my iPhone and iPad but not my computer. Any help here would be greatly appreciated.

001 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job...

Hey All:
I have this message/error/exception in payment run job log.
<b>001 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log</b>
However,payment has been done by F110S.
Any views on why, Is that message just a warning...if so...can we change that into error...and manage not to get that payment done.
Plz advice.......kinda emergency.
Sri

Hi,
Please see OSS Note : 156793
Symptom
In the list of exceptions RFZALI10 or RFZALI20, vendors with a debit balance are listed with item indicator 006 "no valid payment method". Before the upgrade, these vendors were output correctly with´ item indicator 001 "No pymt possible because items with a debit bal. still exist; see job log".
Cause and prerequisites
The precondition for the occurrence of the symptom is that you have implemented Note 150631 in its first version or via Support Package 18 (Release 4.0B) or 02 (Release 4.5B).
Solution The error is corrected with Support Package 21 for Release 4.0B, or Support Package 04 for Release 4.5B. An advance correction is available. To do this implement the additional source code corrections in the attachment to Note 150631.
Hope this help..

F110 No pymt possib because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job lo

Hi Experts,
I have vendor line items Rs 25000 alongwith that credit memo Rs 5000 with document type RI (RI- MM Invest invoice). However when we execute the payment run for this venodr it has gone into error "No pymt possib because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log". When We replicate a test case with document type RE ( RE-MM invoice ) it was allowed to reallocate credit memo value againt the invoice, but same is not happening with credit memo with document type RI.
Both the credit memo(RI and RE) created against original purchase order, however when we create the credit memo with document type RI, Invest ID checked automatically in line item level. Is invest ID is causing for an error .
Please somebody help me on this.
Edited by: Mahesh Manchikeri on Mar 11, 2011 9:43 AM

Hi Mauri/ Srnivas,
Thanks for your reply.
In this case payment program is selecting credit memos with document type RI (RI- MM Invest invoice) as wells as document type RE ( RE-MM invoice ).
In my test case I have created two credit memo reference to purchase order via transaction code MIRO with different document type RE and RI. If I take document type RI (RI- MM Invest invoice) invest ID is automatically checked at line item level 1 of the accouting document( ie vendor line item level).
And I have created one more credit memo with document type RE with reference to same PO, Invest ID is not ticket automatically at document line item level.
When we ran payment run vis F110, there is no issue with credit memo with document type RE, because I can reallocate credit memo value against the orignal invoice value, however in case of credit memo with document type RI going into exception F110 No pymt possib because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log.
It is seems that because of substitution rule assigned to document type RI with K (Vendor ) Invest ID is automatically picked in the document line item level.
Please let me know if you have any input on this issue.

F110 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist

Hello FI gurus,
I am getting a Vendor in the exceptions list in F110 with the message: No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist.
The Vendor has a Debit balance. There are 3 invoices (total 50,000 INR) and 1 Debit memo (52,000 INR).
Is there any way that I can block the Debit memo and make a payment of 50,000 INR?

Hi,
Put the payment Block A in the Debit line Item.
F110 wil then ignore Debit item and pick the credits for payment

WM: Transfer Requirements with just one item

Hi experts,
does anybody know if it is possible to customize WM in order to create just one item per transfer requirement.
My problem is that in material staging from PP, I have customized creation of transfer requirements on order release. If OF consist of three components, system create one transfer requirement with 3 items, nevertheless I need to create 3 transfer requirement.
Thanks

No std funcationality available but i have done in the Past using the PO item user exit to force the user to enter the one line item PO only or the same item in the next line.
so with the developement it is possible

Transfer Requirement with "processing complete" ( E ) status

Hi all.
I've customized my system to create a transfer requeriment in a "Cancelation of Production order confirmation " Trx: CO13, MM mov. 102, WM mov. 104.
I've customized trx. OMLR to create Transfer requirement for WM mov. 104 to create next the TO manually.
The transfer requierement is created but with status E ( processing complete ) and without TO.
How I can to customize the system to create a transfer requierement with status T ( Partially delivered ) ????
thanks

Hi Navarro,
I don't think you could customize the system to create TR with 'fully deliverd' since there's no point in creating waste in the system...(maybe I'm mistaken...)
My other remark is that you don't need to customize the system since this setting is there as default, except the immediate TO creation - if I understood you well, but your explanation is not clear (to me).
0. Please describe what you did with proper terms, clearly.
1. Are you sure the TO was not created? Did you check the TO reference in the TR (LB03) or in LT22?
2. Hopfully you just did customizing w/o ABAP, please confirm.
3. If you just did customizing, and your TR was created really as fully delivered, you should search for OSS notes (I've just found 155904 but it is not relevant I think), if you fails to find you should contact SAP AG.
But first please check you settings and what happend, and of course please give more details...
Regards,
Csaba

Bug #18104 still exists

Hello,
I am quite disappointed about BDB 5. One of the most nasty bugs (#18104) still
exists. As soon as you want to use the set_thread_count() feature, BDB will not
free the thread-control-block. If you connect/disconnect, BDB will stop working
quite early. You can re-produce this issue with any `db_*` tool.
The testcase:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <db.h>
#define DIRECTORY "/tmp/db"
int main()
    /* open environment */
    DB_ENV *handle;
    int status = db_env_create( &handle, 0 );
    status = handle->set_cachesize( handle, 0, 32*1024*1024, 0 );
    status = handle->set_thread_count( handle, 0x100 );
    status = handle->open( handle, DIRECTORY, DB_CREATE, 0644 );
    if( status != 0 )
        return 1;
    /* raise error "Unable to allocate thread control block" */
    for( ;; )
        system( "db_stat -e -h " DIRECTORY " | grep process/thread | wc" );
    return 0;
}

Hi Sandra,
Hi Greg,
Our architecture is quite simple: a cron-job runs ENV->failchk() and ENV->txn_checkpoint()
once a minute (which should be fine, shouldn't it?)
The problem, neither ENV->close() nor ENV->failchk() removes outdated items from the
thread-control-block. One would expect, that the PID is added to the block as soon as the
process connects and removed when the process disconnects. But it is not.
If the block runs out of memory, BDB requires a recovery (see the down below testcase).
Usually ENV->failchk() cleans the thread-control-block, as soon as there are more items in
the block than "thread_count". Today three times it did not even remove them, if there were
more than "thread_count" items in the block - but this happend sporadic so it was difficult
to create a testcase.
Once ENV->failchk() cleans the thread-control-block, BDB works as expected. If a process
connects, the PID is added to the block, and as soon as the process disconnects, the PID is
removed from the thread-control-block. You can test this by looping the first loop 1090 times.
The testcase:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <db.h>
#include <errno.h>
#define DIRECTORY "/tmp/db"
static int bdb_is_alive( DB_ENV *dbenv, pid_t pid, db_threadid_t tid, u_int32_t flags )
    int status;
    status = kill( pid, 0 );
    if( status != -1 )
        return 1;
    if( errno == ESRCH )
        return 0;
    exit( 1 ); /* should never happen */
int main()
    system( "mkdir -p " DIRECTORY );
    system( "db_recover -h " DIRECTORY );
    system( "rm -rfv " DIRECTORY "/*" );
    /* open environment */
    int status, i;
    DB_ENV *handle;
    status = db_env_create( &handle, 0 );
    status = handle->set_cachesize( handle, 0, 32*1024*1024, 0 );
    status = handle->set_thread_count( handle, 1091 );
    status = handle->set_isalive( handle, bdb_is_alive );
    status = handle->open( handle, DIRECTORY, DB_CREATE, 0644 );
    if( status != 0 )
        return 1;   /* should never happen */
    status = handle->failchk( handle, 0 );
    status = handle->close( handle, 0 );
    /* Now start workers (`db_stat`) + failchks() */
    for( i=0; i < 1089; ++i )       /* thread_count - 2 */
        fprintf(stderr,"Number of items in the thread-control-block: "); fflush(stdout);
        system( "db_stat -e -h " DIRECTORY " | grep process/thread | wc -l" );
        status = db_env_create( &handle, 0 );
        status = handle->set_isalive( handle, bdb_is_alive );
        status = handle->open( handle, DIRECTORY, DB_CREATE, 0644 );
        if( status != 0 )
            return 1;   /* should never happen */
        status = handle->failchk( handle, 0 );      /* strange - does not remove the process-entries created by `db_stat` */
        if( status != 0 )
            return 1;   /* should never happen */
        status = handle->close( handle, 0 );
    /* raise error: "Unable to allocate thread control block" */
    for( i=1; i < 422; ++i )
        fprintf(stderr,"Number of items in the thread-control-block: "); fflush(stdout);
        system( "db_stat -e -h " DIRECTORY " | grep process/thread | wc -l" );
    /* You should see on stderr:
            db_stat: Unable to allocate thread control block
            db_stat: Unable to allocate thread control block
            db_stat: DB_ENV->open: /tmp/db: Cannot allocate memory
    fprintf(stderr,"BDB is dead now. Only `db_recover` helps...\n%s\n",db_version(NULL,NULL,NULL));
    return 0;
}

HT1338 I am trying to upgrade my iPhone via my macbook but the messageThere are purchased items on the iPhone "Mark Price's iPhone" that have not been transferred to your iTunes library. You should transfer these items to your iTunes library before updati

Good morning
I am trying to upgrade my iPhone via my macbook but the following message keeps coming up and the download does not work
"There are purchased items on the iPhone “Mark Price’s iPhone” that have not been transferred to your iTunes library. You should transfer these items to your iTunes library before updating this"
Please advise how I can transfer these files, I am not sure what files are in question.
I've only had the MacBook a couple of days, I am PC savvy but this is all new to me so please keep it as simple as possible. I am a brit based in Bahrain.
Regards
Mark Price

okay I've done everything regarding the transfer process (via file>transfer purchases) and syncing, so everything on my iPhone device seems to have been transferred to my iMac... however, I still get that message ("There are purchased items on the iPhone..."), trying to upgrade the iOS Have tried several times the same process of hitting transfer purchases via file, but nothing seems to make that message go away! Would have been nice to know which files I actually do need to transfer, which I don't get any info on of course...
Starting to get really annoying this thing.. Any smart suggestions what's going on?

It doesn't work when I press "transfer purchased items from ipod" and I don't know specidicly whitch item I need to transfer

It doesn't work when I press "transfer purchased items from ipod" and I don't know specidicly whitch item I need to transfer.
Whenever i press "transfer purchased items from ipod", itunes sync's for about 3 seconds, but I still can't install updates on the ipod without itues warning me about purchased items on the ipod, that aren't in the itunes library. I've tried folowing the steps in itunes help, but I can only find a step guide for when you know the specific item that needs transferring, and I donøt know that specific item.

This Apple Tech Note explains the process:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1848
It will transfer all purchased items that the computer you are transferring to is authorised to play: you don't have to select the items.

List of Open Transfer Requirement(TR)

Hi all
I want to know about report : List of Open Transfer Requirement(TR). Where i have to get the details. ie. Which table i have to get it? Can any one explain that reports briefly? Any Standrad T.code is there ?

Hi Muthu,
You can use LB10 standard transaction to get the list of open TRs. You can start to process them in this transaction.
TR-tables: LTBK (header), LTBP (item) - you can use LTBK-STAU to sort out cmpleted&partially processed TRs.
BR
Csaba

Incorrect UoM Conversion on Transfer Requirement from Production Order

I have a Question on a Production Order that created a Transfer Requirement. Looking at the Components of the BOM within the Production Order, I have a Material where the Issue Unit of Measure is QT and the Base Unit of Measure is EA, with a Quantity of 1. In the Material Master Alternate Unit of Mesaures, the Conversion is setup so that 1 QT = 1 EA. The question of why the 1 for 1 conversion is not relevant, as this is just how the material was setup and I know it does not make any sense. When the Transfer Requirement is created it is showing that 1 Qt = .25 EA. I am unable to locate where this conversion is coming from. We do not want to lose visibility of this part number, as creating a new part number with a Base Unit of Measure of QT would fix the problem.
Is there anywhere in configuration where there could possibily be a Conversion? I have looked at Control Cycles and the Reference Operation Set and do not see anything.

Closing Thread as there has been no responses but I am still looking for a solution. The only possibility that exists at this time is the material was copied from another material and the UoM Conversion was 1 QT = 4 EA on the Copy From Material. I can not see where any changes were made to the unit measure conversion for the new material. The only other possibility is the Production Order was manually converted to the new material incorrectly.

Transfer requirement items to be processed still exist. message no. L3 449

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for