Transfer Requirement with "processing complete" ( E ) status

Hi all.
I've customized my system to create a transfer requeriment in a "Cancelation of Production order confirmation " Trx: CO13, MM mov. 102, WM mov. 104.
I've customized trx. OMLR to create Transfer requirement for WM mov. 104 to create next the TO manually.
The transfer requierement is created but with status E ( processing complete ) and without TO.
How I can to customize the system to create a transfer requierement with status T ( Partially delivered ) ????
thanks

Hi Navarro,
I don't think you could customize the system to create TR with 'fully deliverd' since there's no point in creating waste in the system...(maybe I'm mistaken...)
My other remark is that you don't need to customize the system since this setting is there as default, except the immediate TO creation - if I understood you well, but your explanation is not clear (to me).
0. Please describe what you did with proper terms, clearly.
1. Are you sure the TO was not created? Did you check the TO reference in the TR (LB03) or in LT22?
2. Hopfully you just did customizing w/o ABAP, please confirm.
3. If you just did customizing, and your TR was created really as fully delivered, you should search for OSS notes (I've just found 155904 but it is not relevant I think), if you fails to find you should contact SAP AG.
But first please check you settings and what happend, and of course please give more details...
Regards,
Csaba

Similar Messages

  • WM: Transfer Requirements with just one item

    Hi experts,
    does anybody know if it is possible to customize WM in order to create just one item per transfer requirement.
    My problem is that in material staging from PP, I have customized creation of transfer requirements on order release. If OF consist of three components, system create one transfer requirement with 3 items, nevertheless I need to create 3 transfer requirement.
    Thanks

    No std funcationality available but i have done in the Past using the PO item user exit to force the user to enter the one line item PO only or the same item in the next line.
    so with the developement it is possible

  • Transfer Requirement with Inbound delivery.

    Hi Guys,
    I have the following problem:
    The Warehouse is HU managed.
    When I have a Purchase Order and I do a Goods Receipt the system is creating a Material Document and in addition a Transfer Requirement.
    But
    When I have a Purchase Order and I have an Inbound Delivery, before I can do my Post Goods Receipt I have to do my TO creation and confirmation.
    In IMG under Handling Unit Management > Basics > Delivery > Define Sequence of Transfer Order - Goods Receipt I can make my settings so that I can do my Post Goods Receipt before my TO creation and confirmation.
    This means that I have again first a Material Document. Only in this scenario I do not get a TR, although in the WM - IM interface for movement 101 TR creation is set to X.
    How can I get my TRs?
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Answers to your questions:
    Yes                 Yes             No.
    The MIGO transaction is there to do the GR at the moment the truck is at your door, the inbound delivery transaction (VLxxx) is there to have an ASN creating the inbound delivery days before the truck will arrive. To avoid open TRs sitting there for days, the system normally doesn't create the TRs. The posting of the GR (and the availability for MRP etc) can only be done after the TOs are created and confirmed. If you look at an inbound delivery under the subsequent functions it says "create TO".
    So you create TO from the inbound delivery and after that you post the GR.
    Only, there is a way to turn around the sequence (when using HUs) but then the Mat Doc is created and not a TR.
    We need the TR to be send by IDOC to another system.

  • Update transfer requirement user exit, with order

    Dear experts,
    I want to use exit MWMTR001, function module EXIT_SAPLL03T_003 to update the Transfer requirement with the Order number created in COR1.
    But I see that by the time the user exit is called, the order number has not yet been created in the database.
    Is there maybe another place to do what I want?
    Thank you in advance,
    Roxani Athousaki

    Hi Frenchy,
    Thanks for the answer. I have one more question.
    Is it possible to automate it based on a movement type, so that every time we create a Transfer Order for this movement type the relevant TR will be automatically marked for 'final delivery'. This would help us, because then we would not have to go to WAM everytime to mark it as complete.
    Or some kind of configuration that will dictate that only one Transfer order will be allowed for a Transfer Requirement and the TR will be set to complete as soon as the TO is confirmed.
    Thanks,
    Mike

  • SAP WM-PP: Spit transfer requirements

    Hello,
    We are working in a WM-PP scenario with transfer requirements and transfer orders.
    For one process we need to use the "2 step picking" functionality of the SAP system.
    In the release of the production order, the system is creating the transfer requirements. SAP is creating one transfer requirement per operation, with many items, one item for each component in the operation.
    This is the problem, instead of one "big" transfer requirement with many items, we need to have many transfer requirements. This is because for the "2 step picking" process we need to have more than one "transfer requirement group" for the components of one production order operation.
    The problem is that the "transfer requirement groups" can group "transfer requirements", no "transfer requirement items". If one transfer requirement is in the group, all its item with 2 step picking belong to the group.
    Summing up, we need a way of splitting transfer requirement according to our criteria, in order to create several "transfer requirement groups" for the components of one production order operation.
    As far as I know, we can only split transfer requirements in one operation according to the destination bin of the component.
    Is there any other way of splitting transfer requirements?
    Thank you very much for your help.

    Hi all,
    Thanks for the replies.
    @ Jurgen: I have setup mail notifications, but I don't see any messages. It looks like SAP simply does not try to create a transfer order in the first place.
    @ Bala: yes this has been checked. Actually I'm part of the project team so any changes would have been done by myself most probably. Anyway, no changes made to this part of the system.
    Any suggestions?
    Regards,
    Oliver

  • Combining Transfer requirements into a Single transfer order

    Hello all,
    Is there any SAP functionality that allows to combine Transfer requirements of various materials into a sinlge Transfer order with various transfer requirements as line items in the transfer order. Pl. reply at the earliest,as this information is much needed.
    Thanks,
    Maxx

    I solved this requirement using wave pick. The steps are explained below:
    Wave Pick:
    1.     LP21 – Replenishment planning for fixed bins – Enter the requirement type as P – Production supply and also enter the requirement number
    2.     This helps to combine the Transfer requirements with the same requirement type and requirement number into a single Transfer order. This can be achieved by enabling the wave pick strategy.
    3.     Wave pick is useful for generating group of deliveries by having time as the basic criteria. Hence while executing LP21- replenishment for fixed bins enter the planned date and time under the section “additional info for transfer requirement”
    4.     Finally, by creating a wave pick with the timeslots, we would be able to group the transfer requirements in to a single transfer order
    5.     We can monitor the wave picks and their status using wave pick monitor.
    Reward points if helpful.
    Regards,
    Maxx

  • Deactivate transfer  requirement and need manual transfer requirement

    hi friends
                                    our bussiness requirement is need manual transfer requirement orders .but when i do grn for raw materials system is automatic generate the transfer requirement numbers.my request is i want do manual transfer requirement with reference to material documnet.
    pls help for this issue
    with regards
    dinesh
    Edited by: code acess on Oct 28, 2010 8:36 AM

    Transaction code : OMLR
    Please deactivate TR creation against the movement type 101 and required movement indocator (B for PO) and also for combination of movement indicator and the Special stock indicator based on your reuirement.
    Path
    Spro --> Logistic execution --> warehouse management --> Interfaces > inventory managemnet> define movement types --> select LE-WM Interface to Inventory Management .
    warm regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Transfer requirement status not updated after TO confirmation

    Hi Experts,
    I have an issue with transfer requirement which is not updated with completed status even after Transfer Order completed.
    Once TO is completed, relevant TR should be updated with completed status. We have many TR in open status even they are completed.
    Could you please help me out how to resolve the issue.
    Regards
    Gowri Sankar

    Hi
    You can use the Warehouse activity monitor (LL01) to select the completed TR's and select the d''delivery completed' button and this will get rid of them
    I hope that this helps
    Frenchy

  • Payables Accounting Process Completing with Error

    Hi All,
    After running Payables Accounting Process I am getting error
    Spawned Process 151662
    MSG-00001: After SRWINIT
    MSG-00002: Check that AX is not installed before calling the accounting engine
    MSG-00003: AX is not installed, Calling the accounting engine
    MSG-00004: After the call to AP_Accounting_Engine_Pkg.Do_Accounting
    MSG-00005: Error occured in the accounting process
    MSG-00006: Error Message:
    REP-1419: 'beforereport': PL/SQL program aborted.
    Inside Execute for Invoice_Canc_Event_Core
    Inside Derive_Accounting_Entry for Invoice_Event_Core
    Starting Accrual Basis Accounting for Invoice Event...
    INSERTing Header into AP_AE_Headers ...
    ORA-00001: unique constraint (AP.AP_AE_HEADERS_U2) violated occurred in
    AP_ACCOU
    NTING_MAIN_PKG.Insert_AE_HeaderAP_INVOICE_EVENT_CORE_PKG.Derive_Accounting_Entry
    <-AP_INVOICE_CANC_EVENT_CORE_PKG.Execute<-AP_ACCOUNTING_MAIN_PKG.Create_Accounti
    ng_Entry<-AP_ACCOUNTING_ENGINE_PKG.do_accounting<-APXAEREP
    with parameters (&PAR
    AMETERS)
    while performing the following operation:
    &DEBUG_INFO
    End of log messages from FND_FILE
    Program exited with status 1
    Please suggest what could be the possible error, this is happening in Production so sort of urgent!
    Thanks,
    Anchorage

    Duplicate thread ..
    Payables Accounting Process Completing with Error
    Payables Accounting Process Completing with Error

  • Changing purchase requisition with processing status B

    How can I restrict purchase requisition changes with processing status B regardless release indicator. Rel 4.7

    Hi Mitra,
    You will find your answer here.
    MRP controller for PR document type
    Do let me know if it helped, as I might have to explore this option for an upcoming requirement.
    Thanks
    Shailesh

  • Transfer Requirement for Movement Type 262 (Cancel With Ref to Reservation)

    Hi Experts,
    it is possible to configure the system to create a Transfer requirement for movement type 262 (Cancel With Reference to reservation) ?
    When i execute a movement type 262 (Cancel with reference to Order), the system creates a Transfer Requirement, i can process it in transaction LB12. Now i am using the movement type 262 to Reservation, but the system does not create a transfer Requirement.
    I am using SAP ECC 6.0.
    Thanks in advance,
    Alejandro López.

    Hi Alejandro,
    Can you clarify what process you are performing by this comment? .. "_Now i am using the movement type 262 to Reservation"_.
    As per standard process TR (transfer requirement) creation takes place as per the setting in IM-WM interface. Please check in Tcode OMLR, if TR create field is having "X" for the warehouse and reference movement type record. Normally whenever any material document gets posted in IM, MM-WM interface provide the decisions about which WM movement type to pick for warehouse and data about TR , PCN and TO creation.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Sudhir

  • OWB 10gR2 Process Flow returning status = Complete and Result = Null

    Hi,
    I have a process flows i ran lot of times with success (it shows status = complete and result = OK). It invokes a lot of mappings and other flows
    Sometimes one of invoked mapping or flows shows status = complete and result = Null and main process too.
    The main process i invoked by a PLSQL store procedure using wb_rt_api_exec package. When status = Null the store procedure hangs and I have to kill it.
    When it happens, owb service restart (new record in WB_RT_SERVICE_JOB_LOGS).
    Can anyone help me?
    The configuration that I am working with is as below ---
    OWB client version : 10.2.0.1.31
    OWB repository version : 10.2.0.1.31
    Oracle Workflow Version : 2.6.4.0.0
    Database version : 10g Enterprise edition release 10.2.0.3.0

    Sometimes transitions in process flows get scrambled and you have to fix them by hand.....this happens and I dont know why.
    Basically what happens is: every operator in process flow has three outgoing transitions (in general) marked as 0, 1 and 2, when you take a look at details property of your operator then in the outgoing transitions tab you should have ORDER collumn 0, 1, 2 for warning, error and success.
    If this is not the case (0,1,2) process will not know what to return as value, and what is more bizzare this works until it does not :)
    I dont know if this is your case but it's worth checking.

  • XML import issue in Primavera P6: "Process completed with errors."

    When trying to import a small XML file (from MS Project 2010) to P6 server via P6 V7 CITRIX client, then I receive the message "Process completed with errors. See log file for details.".
    But the log files are fine (no error, no warning, final validation status in log file is "successful").
    And no additional project shows up in the EPS.
    // Permissions checked. They are sufficient.
    // File is valid (importable by two other users to the same P6 server: one with local P6 V7 client, one via CITRIX P6 V7 client).
    // I used the same import template as the other two other users.
    // XML contains two tasks only.
    // No resources and no empty rows are in the MPP file, where the XML is created from.
    Does anyone know what to do upon this message, or where the "errors" can be seen (what is neither in the import log files, nor in the PrimaveraLogs folder (P6WebAccess.html), nor in detailed P6 application logfile (I had this activated, but it showed only called features without status, errors or warnings)).
    I highly appreciate any idea! ...

    Hello Rsandilands1
    I just read your query and I am very curious if you did find the right solution? It seems that I am having the same sort of problem.
    Best regards,
    Pal1

  • Transfer requirement items to be processed still exist. message no. L3 449

    Hi gurus
         i have the error during saving the Partial TO , error like "Transfer requirement items to be processed still exist.
        message no. L3   449 ". kindly suggest me , where i made mistake
    with regards
    DINESH KUMAR

    Hi JURGEN,
       whatever you told ,I followed and Activated partial picking for shipping.... but that is for SD module transaction.. i talking about Partial transfer order of goods issue against production order....
    If you have  difficult to understand my queries means, kindly send me your personal mail id. i will the screen shots to your mail id.
    THANKS YOU FOR UR SUPPORT
    With Regards
    DINESH
    Edited by: code acess on Dec 15, 2011 5:27 AM
    Edited by: code acess on Dec 15, 2011 5:47 AM
    Edited by: code acess on Dec 15, 2011 6:12 AM

  • Has anyone successfully connected an AEBS to the new Panasonic TVs with built-in WiFi?  If so, please describe the requirements and process.  Thanks.

    Has anyone successfully connected an AEBS to the new Panasonic TVs with built-in WiFi?  If so, please describe the requirements and process.  (TV subscription is through DirecTV and ISP is TWC.)  Thanks.

    If you wish to use the cellular capabilities of a device, you will need a SIM (unless the carrier uses CDMA which doesn't use SIMs) and you will have to pay a cell carrier. No cell company provides service for free. The only way you will get free Internet is via WiFi to a free and open WiFi access point, as sometimes is offered in public buildings or by some businesses.
    Regards.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Virtual Cube with Services - Debugging

    I want to debug the function module assigned to a Virtual Cube with services. Using transaction RSRT, I can access the FM using debugger when the query is initially called, by selecting Debug options/Default Breakpoints/VirtualCube. I want to debug s

  • ZCM Patch Management Dashboard blank

    I'm using ZCM 10.2 RC1 and am trying to test Patch Management. I have patch management working, patches have downloaded and DAU is running. One thing that is not working is the dashboard. I have flash installed but the dashboard is blank. Are there a

  • Lost photos in aperture-- help

    Shooting w Nikon D200- loaded raw images perfectly and now... When started aperture.. lost photos- can't find library of photos-advice? When tried to reload photos- got message 'image not supported'- what happened here? thought I stored pictures in v

  • Help on network prog4ramming

    Hi ! I have got a problem for socket programming. That is, it's ok for a computer inside a LAN to connect to a comp having a specific IP ( say 203.124.2.3). But it's unable for a out-of-LAN computer to contact a computer residing in a LAN, because th

  • Pt:tree of community groups and users

    I am creating a community emailer portlet for emailing the users of a community. I want to use a pt:tree that lists the groups and users who have membership in the community. I want the individual users, groups and users in groups to be checkable. I'