Transfering records to CD HELP!

I have been using Logc 7 for some time to transfer records to CD (I have my record player plugged into the mic port of my Fire wire 410, then import the record as audio)
Here's the problem: When the record imports into Logic, it literally becomes one giant audio track which I then have to manually scan through and cut into into pieces in order to create separate tracks to burn to a CD. Is there a setting or some way that I can program Logic to switch to a new audio track to record to after a few seconds of silence? In essence, I am trying to have Logic recognize the different tracks on the record via the silence between tracks on the record. Ideally, Logic would then start recording onto a new audio track so that each track would automatically be divided for me.
Is this possible? Thanks a lot everyone!

No... Logic is simply recording. It doesn't evaluate what your are recording as to whether it is useful or not. What I usually do when I am trasferring some cassettes to CD is record the whole side and then bring it into WaveBurner and add the track markers there. I then burn the CD with the established tracks.
jord

Similar Messages

  • Export DS to temp. ODS. Transferred records?

    Hello,
    When I transfer data from one ODS to a copy to this ODS via export DataSource I do not get the same number of records in my "temp." ODS like in my "actual" ODS.
    (E.g. actual ODS = 57666 transferred records; temp. ODS = 56.285 transferred records)
    Thanks for explanation.

    Hello Roberto,
    I checked the tables (from both ODS Objects). Both got in the active the same number of records (56.285).
    So the conclusion is that it is uninteresting how many records are transfered. Interesting is how many records are in the active table?
    But nevertheless. Thanks for help.
    CHEERS!

  • Data Load - Added & Transferred Record Miss Match

    Hi to all,
    I am loading data R/3 -> infoCube in 3.x, I can see that too much difference between Transferred and Added Record , Ex Transferred record -> 5032704 & Added record -> 3505696.
    I have checked there is no routine has been written .
    In Selection I have given a range for Object No.
    For 10000 to 99999 Object No Transferred and Added record is same.
    But KSM100 to KSM999 I am getting difference between added and transferred record.
    Please any one help me .
    Thanks in advance
    shalini

    Not all the times would the records would get added to your fact table. You may write an update rule for "not to update certain records". In such cases you may find the transfered and added records different. Another instance could be when you split the incoming record into 2 records in the update rules. In such an instance the no. of added records would be greater than transfered records.
    Re: difference i transfered records and added records
    Re: manage infocube

  • Transferred Records 5463 but Added Records 0

    Hi Experts,
    My current project is CRM BI implementation. I am trying to load in 0BPARTNER Master data and DataSource 0BPARTNER_ATTR is enhanced by 44 customed attributes and it is 3.X DataSource. So, I created 44 InfoObjects, added those InfoObjects as an Attributes of 0BPARTNER. I created InfoSource, InfoPackage and Update Rule accordingly. I got data in PSA. But in DataTarget, I saw transferred records and no added records. Where should I troubleshoots and please tell me steps. Thank you.
    Md

    Md,
    The behaviour is perfectly fine. As its master data, 0BPARTNER already has the master data entries (primary keys in the P table). Only attributes to the same record have been added through the enhancement you have done.
    Please check that the attributes are filled in as you'd expect.
    In the scenario that BP was not loaded before and you load master data, you can see a > 0 figure for added records in manage screen as well.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Ashu

  • Why can I have a difference between Transferred Records and Added Records

    Hello gurus,
    What could be the reason for the difference between the Transferred records and the added records in the request for an InfoObjects?
    I have in RSA3 6452 Records and in the Manage-InfoObject 1002 Records.
    thanks for your help

    - already existing master data (changed but not new)
    - start routine with deletion
    - duplicate records (with error handling activated)
    - end routine

  • Records transferred & records added?

    Hello,
    what is the difference between records transferred and records added? why is there always a difference between the two.
    when i check the contents of the ods object it says records transferred :23,000  and records added:44. Does it mean the ods has been filled with 23,000 or 44 data records?
    pls help. thanks.
    sd

    Records transferred: The # of records coming from the source system.
    Records Added: The # od records finally gets updated into data target. The records added could be less or more than records transferred because of the Overwrite/Addition property of key figures, various logics written in transformations.

  • Added records and transferred records

    What is the difference between "transferred records" and "added records" in Infocube-> manage->requests ??
    Karthik

    Hi Karthik,
    You may have 2 records in the source data with same characteristic values. Then these two will be sumarized and added as a single record.
    say suppose:
    C01   M01   100   200
    C01   M02   200   400
    Now only one record is added to Infocube
    C01   M01   300   600
    -> When there are multiple records with in a same request with same characteristic combinations, They will be summarized while updated to Cube.
    In the above case: No. transferred records = 2
    No. Records Added = 1  
    In this kind of scenarios... Always No. transferred records will be more or equal to Added records.
    Some scenarios like where You split records into multiple records using Time distribution or return table... Example: You have monthly revenues in a flat file. But you want to split them into weekly records(based on averege model) and load to Cube. In this kind of scenarios the Added records will be more that Transferred records.
    So-> Dont expect the added records = Transferred records always.
    Hope this helps.
    Suman
    Message was edited by: suman kumar
    Message was edited by: suman kumar

  • Transferred records vs Added records

    Hi all,
    i've understood the differences between two fields shown in "Manage Data Target", then TAB "Request.These are the fields:
    - "transferred records";
    - "added records".
    Could you please help me on this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Federico

    Hi Federico,
    Please try to search the forums:
    Transferred and Added records
    transferred records and added records
    Hope this helps...

  • Difference between Transferred Records and Added records

    Hi,
    I am loading data into infocube ZPT_C01, a copy of 0PT_C01. In the "Manage function", under "Requests", I see two columns. One that says Transferred Records: 271370 and the other Added records: 30320.
    I understand that 271370 is the number of records in the PSA. Is 30320 the number of records added to the Infocube?
    Why aren't those two numbers identical? Are records lost? Can someone explain to me why the two record numers aren't the same?
    Thanks in advance
    Michalis

    Hi,
    the collapsing of a request is usually done when its data has been judged "correct" since a collapsed request cannot be deleted from an InfoCube.
    Now in your case, it seems that you are always having one request in your ICube and you systematically delete the datatarget content prior loading it; you could collapse your request or not. If you collapse it you might get less records in your E fact table with the corresponding increase of query runtime; however if the ratio #records collapsed (in E table) / #records collapsed (in F table) is close to 100%, you most probably don't need to collapse this request.
    In your scenario you have to be careful with the dimension tables; indeed when you delete the cube content via a chain, the dimension tables won't be deleted (that's good since when the next request will come the system won't have to recreate all the DIMIDs already present) and after a while many of these DIMIDs will perhaps not be used (you can run the corresponding RSRV check to verify this)...
    hope this helps...
    Olivier.

  • Difference i transfered records and added records

    Hi friends,
    I have loaded data into ODS and it was succesful,but when i check in the Requests tab in mangae i found that number of records transferd is 4000 but number of records added is just 1401. can anyone please advise me where ami going wrong.
    Regards
    Ananth

    Hi,
    The reason they could be different for an ODS is because in an ODS the record is identified based on the key fields.
    For example
    If I have GL posting document wherein the Posting document no. is the key field in the ODS. I may have modified the same GL posting document in R/3 for 6 times but wben it is uploaded into an ODS it will just contain one record for the final staus of the GL posting document.
    So in this case even if 6 records are transferred, only one record will be added to the ODS.
    As a result it is not always necessary that there might always be something wrong when the transferred and added records are different.
    But for ODS it is important that the key field is correctly identified, if that is not the case you might have records being overwritten (transferred records more than added records) which might be wrong.
    So I would suggest you to check the Key fields, and if your totals match with R/3 or the source data.
    Hope it helps
    Cheers
    Anurag

  • Difference in Transfered Records and Added Records

    Hello All,
    I did the delta load of my Sales Orders and Items for the first time. The load is successful but when I see in the Manage Screen of the ODS, I noticed that the number of the Transfered records and the Added Records are different i.e for ex: the Transfered records are 4 and the added records are 2.
    Why is this happening? Is this because I miss something?
    Rgds,
    Sharath.

    Hi Sharath,
    As manga said it might due to transformations - update / tranfer rules.
    Another reason would be the key of ODS for eg: if the extractor is pulling based on say three key fields from the base table say  A B C and if you defined only A B as the key in ODS  then these gets overritten
    Hope this helps
    Thanks,
    Raj

  • What's the difference between Transferred Records and Added Records?

    When right click an ODS or a cube to select Manage, then under the 3rd tab called Requests, there are two columns called Transferred Records and Added Records, what's the difference between these two?
    Thanks

    Hello KeLviN,
    How r u ?
    Consider a realtime example.
    Assume a transfer of Transactional Data from R/3(with PSA) which is having Unit values in it.
    Now, I found in RSA3 2844168 of records. In BW I saw one Data Packet with 306 error records(because of a UNIT value is not available in BW T006 table, Eg. YDD) which are automatically collected in PSA. Now in the Monitor screen you could see 2 Monitor status with GREEN Signals for 2 set of data.
    1. with 2843862 records
    2. with 306 records
    Now, if u manage the Data Target you will get 2844168 in the Transferred Records & 2843862 in the Added Records. and the 306 error records are in the PSA.
    Hope this is clear.
    Best Regards....
    Sankar Kumar
    +91 98403 47141

  • HT1386 I am having problem syncing my itunes data from my computer to my ipod and ipad. My data is not fully transferred.  Can someone help me?

    I am having problems syncing my itunes data from my computer to my ipod and ipad.  The data from my computer is not transferring.  Can someone help me?

    What happens when you try to sync?
    Does any media sync?
    Was the iPod previous synced to another iTunes library/computer?
    Have you successfully synced from this iTunes library/computer before?
    Do the songs play in iTunes?
    Do you have the right boxes checked to sync?
    iTunes: Syncing media content to iOS devices and iPod        

  • ToolTip_Text not working in multi - record block - Please Help!!

    Dear Friends & Gurus,
    I'm using Forms Version 6.0.8.21.3 (due to many reasons) in C/S mode. Now I have a multi record block in which I am showing the Employee No. My customer's requirement is when I place the mouse on this Emp no., the emp. name must be displayed. I thought of achieving this by ToolTip_text. For this I'm having a Database function which returns the name (as I use this functionality in many forms), in the When-New-Item-Instance block level trigger I'm calling that function with passing the emp code as below
    SET_ITEM_PROPERTY(:SYSTEM.CURSOR_ITEM, TOOLTIP_TEXT, FUNC_DIS_EMP_NAME(:SYSTEM.CURSOR_VALUE));But it is working only when I point the mouse in the first record. When I click on 3 or 4 record and then point to the first record, I'm getting the 3 record's name but in the first record.
    Please help me - I searched through the forum and I find no accurate answer. It is urgent - please help.
    Thank you.
    With Kind Regards,
    Perumal Senthil Alagu.

    Dear Safwan Bhai,
    As salaamo alaikum Rahamatulla hi burakathu!!
    Actually I'm having a multi record block in which all the emp no., days of attendance, etc will be displayed when I click on the search button. My requirement is when point the mouse over the emp no, the emp name must be displayed as a Tool tip text. My fields are non-editable, so Post-Change is not working. I placed the coding in the When-new-item-instance - in this case the emp name is displayed, but only for the first field, when I move the mouse to second and third fields, the empname of that particulart field is displayed as a tool tip but in the first field only.
    Any other suggestions?
    Anyway I would appreciate your help.
    Thank you.
    With Kind Regards,
    Perumal Senthil Alagu.

  • No.of transferred records do not match with delta records in RSA7

    Hi,
    The full update was failing since a number of days in 0vendor because of error in the source system. So I did an initialize with data transfer and corrected the PSA data and updated it using scheduler in the infoobject. In this case the number of transferred records was 24300 and added records was 0.Next I executed the delta infopackage and was expecting 0 records,since there were 0 records in rsa7. But I got 16000 records.Can you explain me why this happened?
    Regards,
    Shalaka

    Hi Shalaka,
    In which version of SAP you are working?
    You might want to have a look at the table BDCP2 which is a different table that handles the delta mechanism for the change pointers.
    You can reset the processing status using the program RSA1BDCP ex with following entries.
    Now, coming to your issue - to verify the initial loads I am listing some basic checks(step by step).
    You can give it a try in Dev/QAS if you have any restrictions in Prod.
    1. Check and verify if the RSA7 delta queue is present.
    2. In BW system, delete the INITIALIZATION request from infopackage - This should delete the delta queue from RSA7 in ECC system. (I am not 100% sure about this so try this once)
    3. Re-initialize the datasource from BW system and note the no. of incoming records in BW. This should match with LFA1 entries.
    4. Check the delta queue in RSA7 - There should be a new delta queue created
    5. Start the Delta load - The should not be any records coming in to BW
    6. Check the entries in table BDCP2 and its process indicator.
    7. Create a new vendor from XK01 and check the entry again in BDCP2 table.
    8. Run the delta again in BW and this time delta should have the newly created vendor.
    Also be aware that since its a master data datasource and deals with change pointers you will not see any entries in RSA7.
    A possible reason I could think of you getting 16000 records in delta is because you might have initialize the datasource is past and then started the FULL loads. So the deltas actually started accumulated in BDCP2 with processing status as BLANK and then when you triggered delta again back now all the historical deltas are processed.
    This apply with BDCPV too if you are on older version of SAP.
    Did you tried running delta's multiple times - you should not face any delta records when the processing status of change pointers is set to 'Processed' i.e. 'X'.
    PS: You can find the message type for 0VENDOR_ATTR in ROOSGEN table. This will be useful in looking at table BDCP2.
    Please let me know if there are any questions.
    Thanks
    Amit

Maybe you are looking for