Transforming to Layer Group Vector

First, I apologize if this isn't the proper forum for this question; it was the closest I could find for the nature of my question.
I have a layer group containing various vector layers of all shapes and sizes. For the ease of design, I allow various vectors to expand over the edge of the button, which gives that edged effect. Ultimately, this is all contained as the Layer Group itself has a vector mask applied to it.
The issue arises when I try to do anything with this group as a whole. While transforming, for example, the parameters of the transforming box are well outside the bounds of the Layer vector - obviously, it's giving the dimensions of all the vectors inside. My question is this: is there any way or workaround where I can get PS to treat the group by the size of the vector, rather than the internal layers?
I realize this is a very specific question, so if an example is needed, I can get one.
Thanks!

...I just realized I made an error. Hah, sorry. In a gloriously dislexic moment I misread "PDF" as "PSD"... Sorry about that.

Similar Messages

  • [BUG]PS CC Layer Group add vector mask and disable it,use path selection tool click,always crash!!!

    [Bug] Photoshop CC,Layer Group add vector mask and disable it, use path selection tool click canvas, always crash!!!  Please help me!
    The sample psd file(158KB):
    http://doc.aoyea.com/ps_cc_bug.psd
    My Computer configuration:
    SONY VAIO CA100 Notebook、Intel Core I5 2410 CPU、16GB RAM、AMD Radeon 6600M(1G RAM)、Windows7 x64 SP1(clean)、Scratch disk free space is 100GB
    email: [email protected]

    Hi,
    As far as i know that's a bug that will hopefully be fixed in the next update to photoshop cc.

  • Moving a layer group should not incure a performance hit (init a set of layers vs recursive)

    I have finally taken the time to understand the behavior of the slughish performance of moving layer groups.
    On my computer in CS6:
    1. If I have just 2 layers in a layer group. Selecting both of them and ctrl-dragging them around is smooth and responsive.
    2. If you have however select the layer group which contains just these 2 layers, the performance is obviously and terribly impacted. The drag is slow and choppy. With just 2 it is unbearable with regards to workflow but with a large layer group the performance it is utterly unusable. I am now looking to test what occurs in older versions.
    I am a programmer. Not only that, I am a programmer who regularly targets 16 milliseconds on the scene and model graph. Learn to code and learn to program with hitting a 16ms user experience. That means abstraction culling to perform a minimum number of operations for a feature vs inertia, not the logically beautiful and sound abstractions we all would love to have on infinite computation. That's the reality of performance optimization. Performance optimization should be refered to as abstraction culling because that's what it is.
    It should not make any logical difference how a set of layers is initilized for a transform. Please initialize the arrayed set of layers from the hierarchy of groups instead of executing your obviously flawed and unoptimized recursive routine.

    I'm just not seeing a difference in performance between dragging a single layer around, multiple individually selected layers together, or a whole group of layers (where the group is what's selected in the Layers panel).
    I tested on both Photoshop CS6 and CC.  I'm on Windows 8.1.  And I can honestly say I've never seen the layers panel scroll slowly.
    That's not to say I'm seeing instantaneous, smooth moves of layer data - with a sufficiently large image, the update rate goes down to where the frame rate of moving things is quite visible - e.g., 4 or 5 frames per second - but that's still interactive, and it has always been like this with Photoshop as far back as I can remember.  If anything, moving data around has gotten a bit snappier in Photoshop CC.
    You may well have something specific going wrong on your system, or with your particular document.
    Why not post a copy of a specific test image on which you can reproduce the issue, and that you'd like others to test with.  I'll be happy to drag layers and groups around in it and report back.
    That reminds me, I need to get software installed to capture my desktop as a video, as I need to make a training video soon.
    -Noel

  • Import psd with layer groups in AE CC - "Retain Layer Sizes" not working

    Hi All,I created some shape layers in Photoshop and grouped them separately. Then imported this psd file into AE. I checked "Retain Layer Sizes" however all the layer-groups have the same size bounding box as document size instead of at the layer size. If I ungroup them in Photoshop and then import it, the "Retain Layer Sizes" just worked fine.
    Environment:
    Mac OS X Yosemite 10.10.2
    Photoshop CC 2014
    After Effects CC 2014
    in Photoshop:
    in After Effects:

    Thank you Rick!
    Yes I noticed that. I wonder if it is possible that to make bounding box to extend to only the dimensions of the subsequent layers instead of document size? Now you can see that the anchor points are not located at right place. The reason I grouped layers in Photoshop is that I want to transform or animate one group at same time.
    Sorry for my poor English

  • Importing PSD with Layer-Groups in AE - No align Anchor Point

    Hey folks!
    I am importing a PSD file into AE.
    This PSD includes "normal layers" and "layer-groups".
    At the import-dialouge i choose "Footage Dimension: Layer Size", to get the anchor point in the center of my objects.
    This works just fine in case of the "normal layers", but the "layer-groups" (wich turn into comps in AE) didn't have an align anchor point. Instead of this it is in the center of the whole PSD-file.
    Is there any trick to handle this problem?
    Thanks a lot!

    That's a limitation you have to live with. After all, the PSD dimensions are used for the comp size and in PS groups are just that - organizational structures, not real transform hierarchies, so there is no persistent information.
    Mylenium

  • CS6 clipping path for layer group

    Hi
    In PS cs6 i cant find how to create clipping path for layer group (apply to folder from some shape layer with alt + drag&drop) created with pen, rectangle etc tools.
    Here is how it should look in cs6 but i don't know how to do that
    Thanx in advance

    Shape Layers’ Vector Masks don’t appear in the Layers Panel in CS6 (seems like a bad idea to me, but that’s the way it is now), so you could still select the Shape Layer with a Path Tool, select the Paths, copy, select the Group, paste, Layer > Vector Mask > Current Path or command-click the Layer Mask icon in the Layers Panel.

  • Photoshop CC 2014 hangs for nearly 15 seconds when using Layer Group Layers or Layer Palette Group from Layers commands.

    Photoshop hangs for nearly 15 seconds when using Layer > Group Layers or Layer Palette > Group from Layers commands. NOT on creating new group and creating layers and drag-n-dropping layers into group manually in Layer Palette. Got a UI design file with nearly 800 layers and lot of groups. This doesn't occur in smaller files. Using OS X Mavericks, Photoshop CC 2014.2.2, Mid 2014 15-inch Retina Macbook Pro.
    I understand that the solution would be just to cut the file into smaller files and design each UI view in a separate file but that would be painful. And it does not seem to be a very hard task to just group layers.

    Does the document also have a lot of layer comps?
    And can you post that document or send me a copy of it so we can see exactly why it is hanging?

  • Importing layer groups from photoshop to flash cs4

    Hi everyone,
    I have about 5 layer groups in Photoshop and in each of the groups/folders there are some layers with some text and other layers with isolated images and also layers with some layer styles. When I import this file into Flash I need each of the layer groups to be imported as a flattened bitmap image. I don't want any of the text to be editable or to have any of the layer styles intact. So if there are 5 layer groups in Photoshop, I just need five bitmap images in flash. I've tried doing this but it still imports the layers separately. I know I can flatten the groups in Photoshop but I want to keep this file editable.
    Does anyone know how to do this?
    Appreciate any help.

    Harry Kunz wrote:
    Then why not flatten it (BUT not save it) and import it into flash THEN revert the photoshop file (CTRL+Z) so it will still be editable version?
    Yeah I know that's an option but I just thought there might be a quicker way, but maybe not.
    Thanks for the suggestion though.

  • PSE 10 Can't edit read-only layer groups (a.k.a.  I just want to make a custom DVD menu in Elements)

    A little background: I wanted to make a custom menu so I opened a copy of one of the canned menu.PSD files in PS Elements 10.  It opened up with all layers and their sublayers showing.  So far, so good.  I did a bunch of editting and had my menu just about right, saved it and burned a DVD with it.  I saw some corrections that I needed to make so I opened the same .PSD file and it showed all the main layers (with the folder icon) but not the attached layers. 
    I double-clicked to open these layers and got:
    "You are attempting to open a group, which is not supported in Photoshop Elements.  The layers in this group will be simplified into a single layer.  Simplify the layers? Yes No."
    I was just editing these things the day before yesterday.  All I've done since then is register my software online. I have seen it stated in this forum that "Elements doesn't support layer group/sets" but it was referring to an earlier version I'm guessing.
    Question 1:  Is this still true of PSE 10?
    Question 2:  If so, how was I editing them the other day? 
    Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
    Joe

    If you haven't uninstalled premiere elements then it should work, but there are a few things that will not work when editing the dvd templates:
    (it only works on certain dvd templates and only on a machine with premiere elements installed)
    *If you change the document dimensions either larger or smaller. (not the size of the elements in the template but the overall size such as using
    Image>Resize>Image Size or Canvas Size)
    *If you delete any of the layer groups
    *Changing the name of the document
    There are probably other causes and they may know more on the premiere elements forum:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere_elements?view=discussions
    MTSTUNER

  • ? on moving items within layer groups

    i am having trouble using layer groups. I have a layer group named Group 1 with 5 layers in it. Each layer contains 1 image. I'm unable to move 1 layer to center the image without all the other layers taking on the same position.Even if they aren't turned on, or selected. The only layer selected and turned on is the layer i want to move the image.
    I don't have a lock on. Even if i turn off the other layers, once i turn them on again, poof - they all position incorrectly.
    How can I turn off this glue type action from happeing?
    Thanks!
    Marley

    I've never seen anything like the behaviour you are describing.
    The only things that will cause layers to move together are the following conditions…
    selecting multiple layers in the panel
    Linking them as mentioned before (see the small link incon at the bottom of your layers panel)
    highlighting and moving a group. This means using the move tool when a layer GROUP is highlighted not an individual layer
    Your screen shot impies that none of this is happening. Reset your photoshop preferences by holding command option shift while launching the application.

  • Layer group blending modes

    There was some discussion about defaulting layer groups blending mode being normal by default instead of pass through. While I do use a lot of smart objects as "normal" containers (albeit mostly to filter rather than blend), I'm interested in techniques which would make normal a more useful default. Any thoughts?

    OK... Here's my 2 cents. I use layer sets (layer groups) often in color correction work. Some times to get color where you want it, you may need to use 2 or 3 adjustment layers. For instance a Hue Saturation layer and a Curve layer. rather tan masking both of them, I put them into a layer set, and make one mask at the set level. This is helpful if later you need to extend the correction to include additional areas... all you need to do is modify one mask. In this situation, the layer set has to be set to pass through in order to affect pixels below it.
    Now, lets say I grabbed a head from a different image, to add a person to the image I started with. If the head requires brightening and color adjustments to make it match the existing image, I find it a little neater to place the head layer in a layer set, then all the adjustment layers can go inside the set with it. But I need the blend mode of this set to be normal, so that the effects of the adjustment layers within it do not continue past the set level. Make sense?
    I realize that you can link the adjustments to the layer you intend to affect, but I find the method I described to just be a little neater as far as layer management. AND if I then need to paint in hair for the head layer and paint in some eye enhancements, I can do each on its own layer inside the set. Sometimes I'll make the blend mode of the layer set for the head (just to stick with the same example) normal then put all my color adjustment layers inside a sub set with a blend mode of pass through. Then I can mask the CC layer set to only CC the eyes let's say, and I can mask the head layer set separately to blend it into the scene.
    I hope all that helps. :^)

  • Layer group visibility toggle

    With the help of this forum I obtained a script  which toggles the visibility of a specific layer without  selecting the layer.
    I would like to find out if the same functionality can be achieved for a layer group.
    In other words can script toggle the visibility of a layer group with out actually selecting the layer group?
    I understand some parts of Photoshop are not scriptable and wan to make sure this isn't one of them before I embark in creating the script.

    I have a script that does what you need. Can't remember if I obtained it from here, but I do know that the scripting guys in here are geniuses and can help you out with almost anything. That said, here is the script that you need. All you need to do is replace the three "Insert Layer Name Here" portions with the name of the layer you wish to toggle on/off. Don't thank me, thank whoever wrote it, (most likely someone here)
    var targetID = getLayerIDByName('Insert Layer Name here');
    if(undefined != targetID){
        if(getLayerVisibilityByID( targetID ) ){
            hideByName('Insert Layer Name here');
        }else{
            showByName('Insert Layer Name here');
    function getLayerIDByName(name) {
        try{
        var ref = new ActionReference();
        ref.putProperty( charIDToTypeID("Prpr") , charIDToTypeID( "LyrI" ));
        ref.putName( charIDToTypeID( "Lyr " ), name );
        return executeActionGet(ref).getInteger(charIDToTypeID( "LyrI" ));
        }catch(e){}
    function getLayerVisibilityByID( id ) {
        var ref = new ActionReference();
        ref.putProperty( charIDToTypeID("Prpr") , charIDToTypeID( "Vsbl" ));
        ref.putIdentifier( charIDToTypeID( "Lyr " ), id );
        return executeActionGet(ref).getBoolean(charIDToTypeID( "Vsbl" ));
    function hideByName(name) {
        var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
            var list = new ActionList();
                var ref = new ActionReference();
                ref.putName( charIDToTypeID('Lyr '), name );
            list.putReference( ref );
        desc.putList( charIDToTypeID('null'), list );
        executeAction( charIDToTypeID('Hd  '), desc, DialogModes.NO );
    function showByName(name) {
        var desc = new ActionDescriptor();
            var list = new ActionList();
                var ref = new ActionReference();
                ref.putName( charIDToTypeID('Lyr '), name );
            list.putReference( ref );
        desc.putList( charIDToTypeID('null'), list );
        executeAction( charIDToTypeID('Shw '), desc, DialogModes.NO );
    EDIT- whoops, I just realized this is only for layers, not groups. But hopefully it's a starting point

  • Moving Elements in Layer Groups

    I need feedback as to how to move elements around within layer groups. I always organize my psd files by setting up lots of layer groups. I've noticed that with CS3, that I am unable to move just one layer within a group without everything in the group moving. For example, If I have a group and within that group I have a text layer, and other layers with various elements, If I want to move the type, everything goes with it even though I haven't linked them altogether. Am I missing something? I don't remember this with earlier versions. It is driving m crazy. Is there a preference I have to set? Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

    Is your Move Tool option set to Auto-Select: Group? Change it to Auto-Select: Layer.
    Or just turn it off to disable any Auto-Select..

  • Layer Group Channel blending, incorrect colors

    Hello!
    Wanted to bring up an issue that has troubled me in Photoshop for years, with the hope of it gaining some traction for fixing. For a while now (unsure which version), it was possible to set a Layer Group to filter/isolate a specific channel. This is a very useful feature for me, in creating channel masks for game assets and for use in real time shader techniques. However, it has a very large flaw that has made the feature largely unusable - and I'm surprised others have not had the issue as well as it should affect print as well (if in a lesser effect).
    When you use this feature, and essentially mask the contents of a layer to the Red, Green, or Blue channels, the layers in those Groups are still hit by color management, which results in the pixels drawing and blending incorrect colors. an example:
    In the first file, each group is set to blend to a specific channel, and a black to white gradient is applied in that layer.
    In the second file, those same layers are copied and pasted into the channels of a new RGB document. The file already looks very different.
    Finally, in the 3rd file the two layers are compared using the Difference blend mode. Can observe the difference between the two layers here, which is a result of the first method (Layer Grouping) not blending the pixels properly as if they were a channel - which when using the R/G/B blend masking on Group Properties, is what should be expected.
    When i use this technique of pushing certain black and white images into a channel, they are made for a specific purpose and function. Since the layer group blending alters what the values of those pixels are (very important for real time shader creation) in the final file, it makes this amazingly useful feature unusable. I would LOVE to be able to have Layer Group channel blending be a part of my workflow, instead of constantly copying and pasting into channels. I have created various scripts to save these types of files out easier, but i could greatly simplify them by being able to save this 'RGB Mask' file directly from my PSD.
    Wanted to share and start a discussion about it, to see if it would be possible to get a fix for this in the future!
    thanks!
    Maury

    don't generally like to bump threads, but bumping for some visibility and maybe some insight?

  • Photoshop coloring and layer group issue

    Hello there this is my very first post but I really need some advice here.
    I am using WIndows 7, I have Photoshop CS5.5 and am improving a bit in my digital illustration/coloring. I was experimenting with organization by using layer groups. When I did this and began to work on the colors, I noticed them behaving very poorly. For one thing, they always came out brighter than I intended. No matter how I tried to darken the colors, they always either fixed to a certain tint or just got brighter when I tried to darken them. I noticed them interacting with the colors on all of the other layers, even with layers outside of the group. So to get around that I tried erasing wherever colors overlapped. This did not help, it only removed the mixing of colors, I still have really bright colors on everything I paint. I did notice though that when outside of a layer group, all of the colors behaved normally! Yes I know I can just keep the colors out of the group folder to fix the problem, but I want to learn from this experience. Why do the colors misbehave within layer groups? Why do they respond with a transparent nature(for lack of a better term)? And is there a way around that?
    I did check the opacity of everything and everything was at 100%. I did checkk the blending mode of the group and the individual layers, I had them all set to normal.

    Hi CorbinWells
    It sounds like your brush mode may have been changed to screen or brighten. It sould be set to normal to get your desired results.
    I understand that you said all your layers and groups are set to normal. So I the above solution might help. If not, please attach some screenshots so we can understand more what's going on.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Rman backup with different retention

    Hi, I have to write script on RMAN backup retentions and policies. My requirement is as below: Daily backup Name and retentions : db_daily_bkp_sun,db_daily_bkp_mon...with 7 days retension Weekly backup Name and retentions : db_wkly_bkp_01,db_wkly_bkp

  • Restoring old phone backup to iphone6+

    Hi, I used iphone 5 and now got the new iphone 6+ and restored backup from the old one. i checked the usage in settings and it shows 2.5 giga of photo in photo library however i only have recent photos in my phone. i just want this 2.5 giga to be rem

  • Finder does not see my Western Digital Hard drive?

    I have been using a Western digital to back my macbook, but since upgrading to OS X 9 maverick it is no longer visible in the finder window? I've used the Western digital utility and the drive passes all tests and it sees it? updated the driver view

  • What HD camcorders should I use?

    Is there a list of HD camcorders approved for use with Premiere Elements on iMac?

  • Windows PC freeze when Ipod mini connected

    Hi, I've had my my Ipod for just over a year now and have had no problems so far but last night a serious one occured. I was going to put more music onto the ipod and added the files I wanted to the library. I then connected the USB cable into a port