Translation transport problems

Hi experts,
we're facing a massive translation activity on an SRM system in order to have some texts belonging to custom data elements, custom classes, OTR & so on also in portuguese.
The main difficulty relies on how to attach such translation into a Change Request.
If I do a "fake" modification on a data element (for instance, adding a space in the description), then the system asks for a Change Request... therefore, at least we have a workaround for such elements.
Problems arise when we have to deal with text elements of a custom class; we are able to translate then, but no CR is asked after these activities.
Googling around we found that the report RS_LXE_RECORD_TORDER could do the job; however, when we access this report, the fields
TRANSLATION AREA
and TARGET LANGUAGE
are greyed out (read-only), therefore it's not possible for us to switch to ptBR,
Looked also on service.sap.com for useful notes on this argument but found nothing.
Can anybody help us out with these issues?
Thanks a lot.

Hi,
The fields are greyed out, but this is only to stop you free typing into them. You can use the search help and select your required value.
I would definitely encourage the use of this program rather than retransporting the entire object as it will only transport the necessary text.
Regards,
Nick

Similar Messages

Problem with translation transport

hello everybody,
I have an application with two corresponding transport requests (this is because I would like to transport to different systems only part of the functionality of the app). Recently a translator made an English translation of my application which resulted in a new transport request with about 100 new objects. I would like to distribute accordingly these objects to the two old transport requests ( respectively the two parts of the app). Is there a way to do this, to find out which translation object belongs where?
Thanks

problem with translation transport
Same message here?
Regarding to the issue, perhaps giving some information would be helpful. What kind of objects are them? (Data element, message class? )
Best regards,
Matyas

Open Hub transporting problems

Hi everybody, we have Open Hub transporting problems, it just gives us return code 12 or 8, basically, it doen't want to transport neither Open Hub Destination, nor Transformations, nor DTPs, and bear in mind that we're on the 15th Patch Level. We've looked at all the SAP Notes, but they reffer to the earlier patch levels...
And other problem, is that it's OK in DEV system but in QUALITY system, when you launch a DTP it gives us a dumb with ASSIGN_TYPE_ERROR
Any ideas??

My destination path on the DEV box is simply the following (identified by BID in the following path):
D:\usr\sap\BID\DVEBMGS00\work
And when I locate the un-activated open hub on the QA box, the BID is already changed to BIQ, but the server name box/field is empty....
I am going to try with the object changebility option, btw, is there any documentation on how to change these objects that are marked with object changebility on the QA box (provided that we can not manually change anything on the QA box)...
Anyways, I think my problem is with the server name conversion from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa"....!!!
Also, please note the RSBFILE entry for this object in the QA box has the "btcsrvname" as blank...
Do you think there is any additional setting that needs to be done on the QA box to do this translation (from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa")?
The only two setup we have done as far as the BI is concerned is at the "Tools-> Conversion of logical system name"....where you only put the conversion for client name mapping from dev to qa and local file system mapping from dev to qa.
So, is there anything else to map the host name (from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa") either at BI perspective or Basis/NetWeaver perspective?
Thanks a lot...
~Sabuj.
Edited by: Sabuj Haque on Feb 1, 2009 1:11 PM
Edited by: Sabuj Haque on Feb 1, 2009 5:34 PM

Transformation transport problems when containing routine

Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a transport problem.
When i want to transport a transformation that contains routines, the transport says syntax error in routine. The routine in DEV is tested and correct. I realised, that the transport does not bring the routines. After transport, i open the transformation, and the routines contain the default routine: RESULT = .
I found some answers in some posts, but no exact answer how can i get rid of this transport problem. I don't like copy - paste into prod system with manually editing....
If you have any idea, please let me know.
Thanks
Laszlo

Thanks for your help, it worked now, but i think it should work without owerwrite originals. Sometimes it seems that the routines is not included in the transport request, when i modify a routine in a transformation.
But thanks anyway, problem solved now

The Object cannot not be processed due to a transport problem

We are trying to delete a standard web template 0ADHOC_TABLE (modified by our coworker before and transported) and reinstall a new one or totally standard one, but when clicking the "X" icon to delete this web template, get the following error:
"The Object cannot not be processed due to a transport problem"
What could be the reason?
Thanks

Hi Kevin,
This message coms up because as you mention, the template has been transported. Since it is in the target system, if you delete form the dev system, the system needs to ensure that it is also removed from the system it has been transported too.
You can check the dev package assigned to the template, assign a new request against this dev class (RSA1 > Transport Connection > Bex Truck icon). Log out and log back into WAD and try to delete it, and then send this transport. Or you can simply reinstall it as Roberto suggests.
Hope this helps...

Problem in Translation Transport

Hi,
I have done the translation of the Text element using SE38. But my problem is that even i manually include the objects in the transport request. the translation is not reflecting in the target system.
Thanks,
Martin

Hi Prema,
I am working in ECC5.0
and moreover i have used this transaction 63 before... i dint find any frame as Translation recording...
then actually the path goes like this
translation-R3 enterprise-short texts-ABAP text-Text elements
it is the same screen if we do the translation via SE38
but here i couldnt add the text to transport requests.
Thanks,
Martin

Survey Suite: TRANSFORMER dumps & Transport problems

Hi,
We are on CRM 4.0, SP09.
Always many problems with Survey Suite !
1) Problem when starting Survey Suite ! Unable to solve CL_SURVEY_XSLT_TRANSFORMER dump, even after implementing all mentioned notes !
2) Problem when putting a translated survey into a transport request ! 2 error msgs:
" unclosed element tag; '>' or '/>' expected Entity:
Offset: 0000000000 Error Severity: error. An error occured during parsing "
" invalid symbol '' in literal 'h' Entity: Offset:0000000000 Error Severity: error An error occured during parsing"
After this the suvey can't be transported and a new version and translations have to be created !
Anyone having solutions yet ? Award Points to be won here !
Tx & Regards,
Jan

TRANSPORTING PROBLEMS

Hi Experts,
Good day!
I am transporting custom icludes IN EANL table, while Importing to QA I am getting error as follows.
Error -911-SQL0911N The current transaction has been ro when executing ADD-FIELD of
Error 68 when executing ADD-FIELD of in DDL statement f
Error EANL when executing ADD-FIELD of
(dummy, do not translate)
No DDL commands found for activation of EANL
Error in DDL statement for when executing ADD-FIELD of
Error when executing ADD-FIELD of
(dummy, do not translate)
No DDL commands found for activation of V_EANL
SQL error -204 occurred at location V_EANL0 (object ) - IGNORED
SQL error - IGNORED occurred at location (object ) - IGNORED
SQL0204N is an undefined name. SQLSTATE=42704 (dummy, do not translate)
(dummy, do not translate)
07:00:40: Retcode 1: error in DDL statement for V_EANL0 - repeat
Error -206-SQL0206N when executing ADD-FIELD of is not valid in the conte
Error in DDL statement for when executing ADD-FIELD of
Please advise me.
Regards,
Surya.R

Surya,
I would have to say that you missed a transport along the way that made other changes to the table which cannot be seen at this time. If that is not the problem, then you should check your /usr/sap/trans and verify Data and Cofiles are where they need to be. If that is still not helping, you really need to open an OSS Note with Customer Support as your Development System is improperly creating transports for one reason or another.
Thanks and if this answers your question, please set this thread to answered.

Multiprovider transport problem

Hello Friends ,
While transporting the multiprovider from BW Development to BW Testing system I am getting following error in the Log display of BW Testing System,
R3TRMPRO***(Multiprovider name) was repaired in this system.
The log display for the Delevelopment system shows messages 'Feedback after export or import'--'Successfully Completed'
But the problem occurs in BW Testing system ,
and we are getting the above error message ,
Import--(8) Ended with errors
please suggest solution .
Thanks in advance.

Hello A.H.P ,
Thanks for valuable suggestion.
I think someone has directly repair this multiprovider in Testing system.
I will do the required steps as suggested by you.
Agains thanks very much .
Message was edited by: Amol Kulkarni

Source System Does Not Exist - Transport Problem

Hi
We have the next Landscape in BW 7.0 (Netweaver 2004's)
LRDCLNT300     is R3 DEV
LRQCLNT700     is R3 QA
LBDCLNT100     is BW DEV
LBQCLNT700     is BW QA
The connections are
LBDCLNT100 (BW Dev) use as source system        LRDCLNT300 (R3 Dev)
LBQCLNT700 (BW QA) use as source system        LRQCLNT700 (R3 QA)
In RSA1->TOOLS -> Conversion of Logical System Names
In Conversion of source system after the transport we have these entries
Source System                    Target System
LBDCLNT100 (BW Dev)         LBQCLNT700 (BW QA)
LRDCLNT300 (R3   Dev)         LRQCLNT700 (BW QA)
But when we transport an order from BW DEV to BW QA show the error "source system LRDCLNT300 does not exist"
Never made the conversion of source system after the transport.
Can you help us please.

Thanks Edwin
     I create a RFC for LRDCLNT300 (R3 Dev) in my BW QA system (Target System).
I try an order again but it didn't work, also I try to check 7.0 checkbox but I got the message "No entry exists for original source system LBDCLNT100 for 3.x object"
and I have to uncheck again.
I still have the same problem the objects are associated to R3 Dev, never make the conversion to R3 QA.

Query Transportation Problem?

Hi Guru's,
We are working in Bw 3.5 Version
Query: We have observed that there was a problem with Query in Dev & Quality Server?
as per the regular activities we have modeled the entire process in Dev
from data Source to Data target
then we have developed a report on this data target.
all this was saved under one Request and transported to Quality.
then there was some modifications in update rules & and also in Bex report
for this also we have sent under one request to Quality
there we have observed that the modifications in update rules have been applied
& in report this modifications did nnot apply in Quality server
Can any one help in this ............
advance thanks ,very very urgent..
Points will be rewarded >
Hari

Hi,
I have the same problem. I have a query in production and I need to change it. I changed it in dev, transported the query with no error, but I don't see the changes in prod.
There is any configuration error? Normal transports work fine.
Thanks

Transportation problem in Dev system

Hello All,
I am getting the problem in Transportation. While i am transporting the request from Dev to Quality, the problem is comming in Export. please see the bellow error messages.
Exports with Errors       No Further Transport
    TBD TB Development
            TBD        TB Development
                       Pre-Export Methods                       29.12.2008 13:00:01    (0) Successfully Completed
                       Export                                   30.12.2008 08:47:19 In process: Requires update
                Import steps not specific to transport request
in the log bellow messages are displaying.
   [dev trc     ,00000] Mon Dec 29 13:00:07 2008                          760684 0.760684
   [dev trc     ,00000] Disconnecting from ALL connections:                   10 0.760694
   [dev trc     ,00000] Disconnecting from connection 0 ...                   26 0.760720
   [dev trc     ,00000] Now I'm disconnected from SAP DB                    2370 0.763090
   [dev trc     ,00000] Disconnected from connection 0                        14 0.763104
   [dev trc     ,00000] statistics db_con_commit (com_total=2, com_tx=2)
                                                                                13 0.763117
   [dev trc     ,00000] statistics db_con_rollback (roll_total=0, roll_tx=0)
                                                                                13 0.763130
Disconnected from database.
End of Transport (0000).
date&time: 29.12.2008 - 13:00:07
Please let me know the solution for the above issue, i will assign full points.
Regards
KK

Hi,
Your Error statement COMMIT shows that the sytem has submittted the request to make connection with the system.
But it immediately gives CON_ROLLBACK (statement) error, which generally happens, there is not enough space in your quality system. therefore the Rollback of the submitted request happens.
Check the DB space in ur Qual system and speak to your BASIS team, so that it can increase the DB size and also, u can urself clean the system.

Translation Widget Problem

Hello everyone. I am a pretty new apple user. Got to say im loving every minute of it. Well, two days ago my computer auto updated and since then for some reason my translation widget (came with comp) does not work. I can not type anything in it and it I cannot choose languages to use. Is there any way to reinstall it?

I was having the same problem with the translator widget and did what you said: put my preferences folder on the desktop and restarted it.
This led me to believe the problem was in the original preferences folder.
It was! I found, at the bottom of the folder, the widgets. I just trashed them, and
dragged the folder from my desktop back to my library replacing the new one that had formed. Restart and you should be good to go.

Workflow rule transporting problem

Hi,
When i am trying to transport rule to from dev system to client system it is not getting copied can any body tell how to copy the rule data from dev to c system

Hi!!!
Thanks for ur prompt helps. Actually instead of OBJECTID I was passing the Obj-key and not the OBJECTID. This was creating problem. But still dont know why it was creating the prob.
Anyways THANKS A LOT.
Regards,
Sudipto.

Transport problem - newest versions overwrite by olders during transport

Hello everybody!
I am writing my master thesis, which mainly focuses on problems with transport in SAP, precisely with data inconsistence.
Let's consider the following situation:
In DEV:
1) Create change request R1 containing object O(1),
2) Release R1
3) Create change request R2 containing the newer version of object - O(2)
4) Release R2
In PRD:
1) Import R2 (using Single Import)
2) Import R1
... thus then an older version O(1) is in PRD instead of O(2).
The presented situation is very trivial, however the transport could consist of plenty requests, which contain plenty objects under different requests. If in this case because of some reasons the Single Import is necessary (like some organization prevents from performing an immediate full transport), the transport administrator has to examine all other requests from an import queue, in order to check, if this Single Import do not cause any inconstistencies.
Is there already any tool, which can fully or partly automize this process?
Or maybe anybody has an idea to ensure that the transport is relevant?
On of the solutions is checking every object under all of requests and comparing their versions. Is this effective? Does it totally solve the problem? Does any tool supporting this solution exist?
Do you maybe have any other ideas to solve this problem?
I would be very thankful for your help!
Best regards,
MZ

Thomas:
As far as I understood, you suggest the solution, which would compare timestamp of every object versions. How can I "receive" the information about it? And when should the versions be checked (I mean, before releasing requests, or maybe after releasing, but before import)?
Uwe:
But what if because of some reasons, just one request of this created "request" set is needed? Sometimes Single Imports does not cause any problems and could be even one of the transport strategy. I was thinking more a solution, which would enable a Single Import, but would not allow for data inconsistencies, caused by overwriting the newest version by older versions.
BTW, I was not aware of the fact, that there is no locking in case of customizing requests, thus thank you. To be honest, I do not see any point why in case of Workbench Requests we lock objects, and in case of Customizing Requests we do not. In my opinion it just causes additional problems. Maybe you know, why SAP solved it like that? What kind of advantages does it give? Of course this problem is also interesting.
Sandra:
Yes, DEV+PRD was just to introduce the main idea. The transactions you gave can be of course helpful to find an error, but I was thinking more about comparing versions under two change requests, before the objects are imported to the target system (not between two systems).
Best regards,
Marcin

Translation transport problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for