Transport condition change

Hi,
my problem is that the client want to
change on all invoices (transport to Switzerland) the transporter
conditions from "DDU" to "DDP".How and where I can do it??
And to only for transports to this country.
Thanks in advance and regards.
William

you can change the incoterms at
Customer Level in XD02
At sales Order Level in VA02
At Dleivery level
At billing Document Level
Before Posting of Dleivery and Billing Documents respectively.
Deepak

Similar Messages

  • Transporting Workflow changes to QA

    Hi Experts,
    I have some Qs regarding transporting the changes made to the Workflow.
    My Question is that, a custom workflow has lot of requests associated with it ..( both customizing and workbench ).
    Once my workflow has been transported to QA. Now i have to make sm changes to the send mail step.
    I have made the change and linked it to a transportable workbench request.
    Now releasing this request alone will move the change . Or i have to goto basic data and Active the Strt condition again and transport that too, so that the change works fine in QA ?
    Hope my Qs is clear.
    Regards,
    Radhika.

    I have made the change and linked it to a transportable workbench request.
    Now releasing this request alone will move the change
    Yes, there is no need of transporting again the linkage request.Only the changes are reflected to the other system when ever you try to export a request to other system.
    And make sure each time you do a change and when the request is ported to the other system then run the TXn SWU_OBUF and refresh the organizational assignment . this makes the workflow environment to run smoothly.

  • How to transport Parameter changes in a crystal report

    Hi All,
    Very Good morning!!!
    I have designed a crystal report with static parameters. Earlier i used to have a dropdown kind of input selection for my parameters.
    Now i got a new requirement for a direct input in the field....tht means no dropdown ...single date field is to be entered directly.
    Accordingly i have removed the dropdown and changed to a single direct date field. I saved these changes to a request and transported to quality. Not sure whether the parameter changes are collected into a request.
    Whereas i couldn't found any changes of my parameters in quality. They are as same dropdown manner in the quality whereas i need them to be a direct field date entry which did not affected the quality server after transporting the changes.
    Could some one please let me know how to reflect these changes in quality server regarding parameter changes in a crystal report for BW.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Jitendra

    Please re-post if this is still an issue or purchase a case and have a dedicated support
    engineer work with your directly

  • How to handle the different pricing conditions changes in BI.

    Dear Friends
    can any one send me  Regarding
                    How to handle the different pricing conditions changes in BI.
    Thanks & Regards
    Ramana

    Hi,
    Take a look at the 0sd_o06 ODS and 2lis_13_vdkon datasource for sales billing conditions.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/36/8188408bc0bb4de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/7f/0f8c4037fba62be10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
    Regards.

  • Conditions change...no purchase

    On Itunes, i was purchasing a song. This thing interrupts to tell me the conditions have changed. Whatever, i agree, bla blah. Then i am charged for the song, which DID NOT DOWNLOAD. This has happened twice, i am getting no support, and am thoroughly p.o.ed. Help?

    Hello Darkxone,
    I have not seen this particular issue reported, I do however have a workaround that could at least prevent it from happening in the future, when the conditions change, go back to the home page of itunes and try to "purchase" the free weekly download on the home page, and then agree to the terms, so if you do lose the song at least it won't cost you anything.
    sorry for no real "fix" however I hope this can at least save you some money if you do not find a resolution

  • Automatic PO adjustment for pricing condition changes sap

    Hello SAP users,
    How to prevent automatic PO adjustment for pricing condition changes to purchase order items that are marked for deletion. Please respond.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Check the settings in below configuration:
    SPRO>MM>Purchasings>Conditions>Automatic document adjustment-->Control doc. adjustment.
    SAM

  • Transport of changes in 3KEI

    Hi All,
    I made changes to 3KEI table, When i generate transport system is showing up objects in the request. System allows me to change directly in Quality & Development. But how can i transport new changes to Production? Is there any way or program to transport to production.
    Its urgent please help.
    Thanks

    If you have captured the changed made in transaction 3KEI, release the transport request to QA, Check  and if happy , move to production.
    It does not matter, whether the QA is directly changeable or not. But, in order ensure the QA is test was good, ensure, that the QA is not changed while you are testing. Then move to PRD.

  • Transport and Change Management

    Hello,
    We need to modify our MDM structure (add fields and tables). We would like to avoid unloading the repository. Can we do that in our test environment and move to Production only the structure while keeping the data in Prod.
    What is the Transport and Change Management patch? Is this what we need?
    Thanks for your help!

    Hello,
    This is not possible, as there is no support for Transport and Change management. You will always need some down-time in production. But there are some strategies to reduce the down-time.
    (1) You could use the Java ADMIN API to create a batch-script that performs the required repository modifications. Once you validate it works, unload your repository, run your program and load the repository again.
    (2) Create a "slave" repository and re-direct your production users to that repository. Unload your production repository and make all changes. Once done, reload that repository and switch back. Remember that this will only help to keep a "look-up" only version of the production repository...
    Regards
    Dirk

  • Can't accept new apple condition changes on my iPad Air

    Can't accept new apple condition changes on my iPad Air running 7 1 2 plz help answer me ********
    <E-mail Edited by Host>

    What changes concern your?
     Cheers, Tom

  • STMS_QA - allow transport of change requests

    Hi,
    we have configured the quality assurance tool (TMS). Now the users must - allow - the transport of change requests into the productive SAP-system via
    transaction STMS_QA.
    If we transport objects via "transport of copies" (from another SAP-system) the QA doesnt work. The users can avoid the QA-System.
    Does anyone know how I could define the transport routes to avoid this situation?
    Thanks
    Michael

    put the Objects in this ( from another system )<b> "transport of copies"</b> request and give the TARGET System name .
    It is simple process , if u are doing first time  do it carefully .
    after doing the process check the TARGET system.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • Returncode of Transporting a change request

    Dear developers,
    do you know how to check the returncode when transporting a change request to test or productive system.
    In my case I have the special problem that change requests will be transported in an async way so that the developer could not check in the SAP solution manager whether the transport is error free or canceled with an error.
    Is there a way to switch the transport management in the solution manager to a synchronous mode?
    Best regards,
    Jens

    Hi Ganesh,
    Can I ask something about inactive object here?
    I applied notes with SNOTE.  But all objects are inactive.
    When I activete them, The system requires accesskey.
    How could this happen? And any solution for this?
    I can't deapply the notes any more. coz it's bug fix for SNOTE.
    If I do this, the system will be inconsistent, this happened beffore
    Thanks
    kaz,

  • Transport Query Changes Individually

    In our environment, we have a SOX IT requirement that each change to a query is separately approved by the business user before it is moved to production.  The transport request must be able to be directly linked to a change request management system where the approvals took place.
    We have a large team.  We use the BEx transport, and have set up several development classes to further refine the changes to queries but the problem is as follows:
    If two developers work on separate queries changes at the same time, but both queries are in the same development class, those changes will be mixed (and locked) into the same BEx request.  This makes it difficult to link one change to one request and another change to another request.  If I then require the developers to collect their changes manually to put them in separate requests, they get errors because the objects are already locked in to the default request for that development class.
    What I would like to do is to turn off the automatic recording of BEx changes so that the developers will all be forced to manually collect changes before moving.  Or even better, if they make a change, they would be prompted as per a normal change to an object.
    Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions as to how to resolve?

    Hi,
    You have to make sure that all the elements of the queries are captured in the transport request. For that, in transport connection, while capturing the query, filter on "ELEM" and include them in transport connection.
    As for authorization, you will not have it except in development. Thatu2019s the reason why you can not change the query in GRA directly. You always have to transport the changes.
    Regards,
    Yogesh

  • In our program, we are concerned about reducing CPU work; how to wait until a boolean condition changes in a "while loop"?

    Is there a way to wait until a boolean condition changes (instruction is sent) in a "while loop" (because I want the program run until I press exit button)? Now it is consuming a lot of CPU because it is running the loop very fast waiting for instructions unless I stop the program.
    Thank you.

    Use /functions/time and dialog/wait until next millisecond multiple in the
    loop. Input 100ms.
    "mcdesm" wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    > In our program, we are concerned about reducing CPU work; how to wait
    > until a boolean condition changes in a "while loop"?
    >
    > Is there a way to wait until a boolean condition changes (instruction
    > is sent) in a "while loop" (because I want the program run until I
    > press exit button)? Now it is consuming a lot of CPU because it is
    > running the loop very fast waiting for instructions unless I stop the
    > program.
    >
    > Thank you.

  • Terms and condition change after ios7

    I cant find the agree button under the new terms and condition change after ios7 updates . help pls !

    I fixed this by downloading the app in my iTunes on my computer and acceted the terms from my computer.  Then my iPhone was happy and could download apps again.

  • Terms and Conditions change on 10/15/2014 negatively affecting people with multiple Apple IDs

    I have two Apple IDs and purchased songs and videos through iTunes using both IDs.  Apparently, Apple has changed the Terms and Conditions for iTunes presumably at 12:01am on 10/15/2014.  The most notable change affecting me is related to people with more than one Apple ID.  I downloaded some songs on 10/14/2014 from the iCloud to my MacBook Pro which had been purchased a long time ago with my first Apple ID.  Early the morning of 10/15/2014, I tried to download songs and videos from the cloud to my MacBook Pro this time using a different Apple ID.  When I clicked on the cloud icon by the song or video in iTunes for Mac, I received a pop up message in iTunes stating that I can download past purchases on this computer with just one Apple ID every 90 days.  It continues by saying that my computer can be used to download past purchases with a different Apple ID that user cannot download purchases made using a different Apple ID in 90 days.
    I have a real problem with this change in Terms and Conditions because Apple is telling me that I'm not allowed to have access to purchases I made until 90 days have passed.  These purchases were made prior to Apple's most recent change made to their Terms and Conditions, so they have retroactively restricted my use of media that I purchased legitimately.  I've posted on the support page because I would like to have Apple respond to my post and explain their rationale behind making this change.  Apple?  the floor is yours.

    Ed.  Thanks for your response.  I made the assumption that the 90 day restriction had just been put into place because I was working with Apple support earlier on the 14th and was attempting to download content from my original Apple ID so I could back up everything to my computer and overcome the issue caused by having two Apple IDs.  During the support call, I was able to log in to iTunes and download previous purchases from the cloud for both of my Apple IDs.  When I attempted to do so early this morning, I received the message described above when I logged in to my primary Apple ID and attempted to download the songs I ran out of time to download while on the phone with Apple support.  Thanks for the clarification about the policy.
    The goal of the Apple support person was to overcome the problem of having two Apple IDs.  It would be terrific if Apple came up with a solution for this problem as they have customers like me that would very much like to consolidate all of their purchases under one Apple ID.  Restricting access to legitimate purchases for 90 days is a pretty terrible policy to inflict on people that have paid for the use of these songs and videos.
    I have to give you a hard time about part of your answer (in good fun).  Your answer could be summarized as saying "The best solution to your problem is not to have your problem in the first place."  What it means is that the problem is a legitimate problem that doesn't have a good solution.

Maybe you are looking for