Transport conection to 2 different production systems

Hi Gurus,
hmm, I don't really know if this belongs here, but I try since it is a BW system.
We have to divide up a BW into two different BWs (a part of the company was sold). Only productive BW is divided. Development sydstem will stay the same for both. So we need two differnt transport branches. One to PBWo, one to PBWn from DBW.
I didn't find any documentation about that. If you have something or know where to find it would be very nice.
Does someone have experience with such a system landscape and knows about major difficulties?
Thanks in advance,
Leo

Hi Leo,
Thats possible. Only thing is you have to assign the correct target system (PBWo or PBWn) when transporting. Contact your BASIS on this.
Bye
Dinesh

Similar Messages

Output Difference in different Production system. Urgent

Hello All,
In the development system we have screen exit in QM02/QM01 with two block b1 and b2.
This is transported to several production systems.
Now the problem is :
In some systems it is working good. But in few only one block is displayed.
Please help.
Thanks,
Kunal

Check for linkages. Is the binding activated betwwen workflow to task container.
Check whether values appear in task container or not.
Then check for binding between task & method container. Is there any event linked with the task. Is the event linkage is activated.
The problem might be resolved if all the linkages are correct.

Error while transporting ADDRESS to production system

Hi all,
We are in the process of a new rollout and we have created new plants and company codes. the same have been transported to quality and pre-production systems without any issues. however when we transport the same to Production, we face an error
The object TDAT ADDRESS_4.6 has not yet been imported successfully into client 100
The object
R3TR TDAT ADDRESS_4.6*
has not yet been imported into client 100 without error.
the objects are getting transported with same address number as in development which in production points to a different address.
as far as i know the system should generate a new address number and assign it to the object during transport.
Any suggestion wud be great

the log is
 Post-import methods for change/transport request: MEDK909182
 on the application server: ITMISAPGW2
 Post-import method AFTER_IMP_CUST_ADDRESS started for ADDRESS_4.6 T, date and time: 20090714144548
 Post-processing taking place in client 100
 The object TDAT ADDRESS_4.6 has not yet been imported successfully into client 100
 The object TDAT ADDRESS_4.6 has not yet been imported successfully into client 100
 The object TDAT ADDRESS_4.6 has not yet been imported successfully into client 100
 Post-import method AFTER_IMP_CUST_ADDRESS completed for ADDRESS_4.6 T, date and time: 20090714144548
 Post-import methods of change/transport request MEDK909182 completed
 Start of subsequent processing ... 20090714144547
 End of subsequent processing... 20090714144548
 Execute reports for change/transport request: MEDK909182
 on the application server: ITMISAPGW2
 Reports for change/transport request MEDK909182 have been executed
 Start of................ 20090714144548
 End of.................. 20090714144548
 Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
 End date and time : 20090714144548
 Ended with return code: ===> 8 <===
regards,
Tarun
Edited by: Tarun Bahal on Jul 16, 2009 9:41 PM

Transport FG from Quality to Production

Dear All,
I have created couple of function group and transported to Quality system. Now as per the requirement I have made the changes in different FM of these FG as well as includes. So there are few versions in DEV system.
Now finally i want to transport the these FG to production system. So which transport request I have to use to move to the production?? In Quality it showing different request for each FM and include (Latest version request number).
Can anybody tell me how I can transport my all FG to the production via Quality??
Is it good way to create one more request for all FG using SE03 tcode, so that all FM with includes i have final request in DEV system which I can move to Production via Quality....
Good suggesstion are most welcome.....
Thanks in stack......

Hello Nilesh
This is quite a common problem with function groups.
However, if you have at least one system where the entire function group is complete (i.e. contains all function modules and the TOP include contains all data definitions and the frame program all additional includes) then you can go to the workbench (SE80). Right-click on your function group and choose "Other functions" -> "Write transport request entry". The CTS puts the function group into the transport request which should then be transported entirely.
I highly recommend first to "synchronize" your DEV with your Quality system, repeat the tests there and, if everything was successful, transport to Production.
Regards
Uwe

Same logical system name for two productive systems - BW, PI issues

Dear all,
we have a productive system which serves two companies (different company codes). This system is connected both to BW and PI for both companies.
There is a requirement that these two companies must use their own system, so the whole landscape (dev,qa,prd) will be copied to different systems (different server with different system id).
As a result of the above procedure we wll have two different productive systems, as required, but we wll have the same logical system name for the two productive systems, which must be both connect to bw and PI.
However as far as I know:
- we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
- we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
How can we overcome the problem?
Please advice.

> However as far as I know:
> - we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
> - we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
Right.
> How can we overcome the problem?
Since you split up systems (or plan to) I highly recommend booking an SLO service (http://service.sap.com/slo). Those people have to the tools and the knowlege to help you. I would not do this on my own.
Markus

Infosource invisible in production system

Hello,
We are facing a unique problem that we are not able to find the Info source for a ODS and one Infocube in our Production system. In Quality system it was working fine and we could see these Infosources. But on transporting the complete devlopment to Production system , we could not locate the required Infosources.
As a matter of fact,these Infosources was available in the data flow for the Cube,
and we could go to the infosource by double clicking it in the dataflow. But the same was not visible in the Infosource tab in AWB in production system.
We tried various Options like:
1 RSA1 -> Infosource -> from MENU settings -> display generated objects -> and check the radio button show generated objects. Still the infosource was not visible.
Can anyone please provide some inputs to it.
Thanks,
Vipul

Hi Anil,
Yes, you are right; my Application component had not been transported to Production System.
My Infoareas are lying in unassigned nodes and so the info-objects.
But i dont able to understand why my application componet is not been transported to Production system. When it succesfully transported to Quality system where all things are working fine.
I have transported the same request to production system as well. Can you provide some insight to it.
And to other replies i can say that i cant replicate and activate Data Sources in Production system. I have already done these steps in Development system.
Thanks and regards.
Vipul

Modify request in productive system

Hi expert,
Users want to modify requests in productive system. These request are been created in development and transported in production.
And, in fact, I would like to retransport request modified in production to development.
No problemes for authorization but I would like to know, what configuration to do in productive system (order BEx, parameters in rsa1/ transport connection).
I tried to create :
- a transport request for BEx
- object changeability : everithing changeable for query element
But changes are not registered in the BEx transport request.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
In your systems you have something called a Transport Route. This is a route that it says to a request where it would be transported. I think your productive system may be closed for modifications from transaction SCC1, but you allowed BEx modifications from the object changeability customizing, but this won't collect your modifications in a request, because of SCC1 customizing (and that´s correct). That's how SAP works.
So, if you want to transport from PRD to DEV, you may need to create a new transport route from PRD to DEV, but that's not a good option, and i think basis people wouldn't be neither. Then, you should manually copy BEx modifications from PRD to DEV, and to leave the system consistent, then transport it to PRD in a request. If you want to have always the systems consistent, then you should disable object changeability to BEx objects, and always make modifications in DEV and transport them to PRD.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Diego Lombardini

Identification Test- and Production-System in Mapping

Hi,
we have a Java-function in a mapping step.
There we need an identification if it runs in our Test- or Production-system.
Currently we use a property file in the Java-Package for realizing this.
But this is not a very good solution. The last time we transport the archive to our production system somebody forgot to change this property file and therefore we had some trouble in our production.
Does anybody have an idea how we can identify the system name of the XI-system in a Java-Mapping?
Is there perhaps any constant we can use of the Map input-parameter?
In the documentation I didn't found anything about this.
Best Regards,
Thorsten

Thorsten,
Try using System.getProperty("SAPSYSTEMNAME") in your Java function.
Regards,
Jaishankar

How does production system takes the benefits of user exits

hi
could anybody tel me
how does production system takes the benefits of user exits

Hi,
you have to transport your implementation to your production system.
Regards
Bernd

How to transport the connection in production system

hi
I have a doubt releaated to connection between SAP BI and Xcelsius.
We have a development server on which i have created universe and then on it Qaaws and finally Xcelsius dashboard.
My doubt is in future they will transport the SAP BI system from Development system to Production system.
In this case Universe ,Qaaws,Xcelsius will work?
will i have to develop this again in production system, or any how it will work with production system?
How excetly development work here when we have connection between SAP BI and Xcelsius in different system from development to quality and then in Production?
Thanks,
Piyush

Hi
assuming that the objects (keyfigures, characteristics, multiprovider) of the underlying query are available in your production system you do not have to create your universe again, rather change the connection data to your SAP server (like SYSID, client number etc) in the universe connection.
Additionally if you are working ith BO XI 3.1 I would suggest to take a look to the LifeCycleManager, a tool which can simplify the transport process from your development to your production environment.
Regards,
Stratos

Transport ALE Configuration from Development to Production System

Hello All,
We have created ALE-IDOC scenario in the development system and its working fine. Now we want to transport it to the Production / Quality system. How can we transport the settings like logical systems, port definition, partner profiles, distribution model , RFC destinations from one system to another system??
Because the client numbers are different for development , quality and production systems.. Do we need to transport the logical system and client assignment using STMS or create directly in the target system??
Thanx in advance...

The issue with transporting the ALE distribution model is that the source and target logical system names change between the dev, test and prod environments.
Assume an ECC6 and PI landscape with dev/test/prod called E6D/E6T/E6P and PID/PIT/PIP with all systems using client 100. By default (SAP recommendation) the logical system name for E6D client 100 is E6DCLNT100 and its PI partner in the dev landscape will be PID client 100 with logical system name PIDCLNT100. In test the logical system names will be E6TCLNT100 and PITCLNT100 and in prod E6PCLNT100/PIPCLNT100.
So, when a distribution model is set up in dev with a source system of E6DCLNT100 sending messages to a target system PIDCLNT100 everything works nicely. This assumes that the PIDCLNT100 logical system partner in WE20/WE21 is mapped to a port which maps to an RFC destination pointing to client 100 of PID.
When this model is transported to the test system it won't work because the logical system names are wrong.
It is possible to create a logical system name called PISERVER in SALE and then map that, via WE20/WE21 to point to the corresponding PI instance. Thus in E6D, WE21 would map logical system PISERVER to the RFC destination for PIDCLNT100 but in E6T the mapping would link to RFC destination PITCLNT100 and in E6P to PIPCLNT100. In this way any ABAP programming trying to use the ALE distribution model would send messages to PISERVER and would be transportable.
However, setting up the source system in the same way appears to be impossible. When attempting to generate partner profiles, transaction BD82 stubbornly insists that the source system for which it will build profiles MUST be the logical system name defined for the execution client in SCC4. Theoretically, mapping similar to that for PISERVER could be performed for ECC6SERVER and the ALE distribution model could be built to send messages from ECC6SERVER to PISERVER but BD82 won't honour this source system.
This appears to make it impossible to transport an ALE Distribution Model. Can anybody provide a process to overcome this apparent architectural limitation?

Error message while transporting SapScript to productive system

Hi,
I have tried to transport an order sapscript form (modified Medruck) into the productive system. But I got errors in transaction stms.
The error message is displayed like this:
R3TRFORMZMEDRUCKN was repaired in this system
Message no. TW 104
Diagnosis
Object R3TRFORMZMEDRUCKN is in repair status. Therefore, it cannot be imported.
System Response
The object is not imported.
Procedure
If you still want to import the object, release the relevant repair andrepeat the import.
Does anybody know something about that problem?
Cheers

Hi,
maybe somebody has already create your form in the productive system. Now you would like to create something already created.
Maybe, you have to check in the TADIR table (key R3TR / FORM / name of the form) if the form already exist. What is the system source for the form. (in the PROD)
And finaly, you can go to the SE03, select the first line and execute (to find object R3TR FORM ..) in all the request order. That will show you who has play with this form, and if a request was lost between DEV & PROD. (in the DEV)
Rgd
Frédric
Message was edited by: Frédéric Girod

Problem during import of 121 transport requests to productive system

Hello
We have problem during import of transport requests to productive system. Import of 121 transport requests stopped very soon in phase "N" (in TRBAT I have only one entry and in TRJOB as well).
In sm50 there is an BGD running under user DDIC in client 000 now for 14453 seconds (program SAPLSDB2). This should be import.
In SM37 I can see it as job "RDDGEN0L" with repport"RDDGENBB". Based on some literature it should perform "Converting all structure changes generated by the import and recorded in table TBATG, other than the structure changes to matchcode objects." Very interesting that TBATG has only four entries related to 2 indexes in table "DFKKOPK" , one in table "DFKKREP06" and one" ENQU" for EFKKEXC". (only this last one has not status error)
For fist two indexes I know they are not present as objects "LIMU""INDX" in any transport request beeing imported.
Also on productive system there is no"VOL" and "ZOL"indexes for table "DFKKOPK"(instead they are created on test system ie. not transported from development to test system)
Last command for that process is "CREATE INDEX "DFKKOPK~HKO" ON "DFKKOPK" ("MANDT", "HKONT", "OPBEL") PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 002 TABLESPACE PSA
PTR3 STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K NEXT 0000000016 K MINEXTENTS 0000000001 MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED PCTINCREAS"
There is enaught space on disk and in tablespaces (it is an oracle/HPux server).
Does anyone knows workaroun to solve production

are you importing these transport requests simultaneously into production?
I would suggest you try doing in smaller groups of 5 or 10 and then see whether you are able to import the requests
Rohit

WAD transport to productive system?

Hi,
I have implemented a query in the development system with WAD.
How can I bring the WAD query to the productive system?
Thanks!

You can collect Query and WAD in the same request and transport
Choose Query in Transport con - only necessary objects - assign package - give new request
Repeat the same for WAD and use the same request and release and import to Qual and perform test then IMPORT to Prod

Deleting Variable in production system vis Transport request

Hello,
I need to delete a variable in production system via Transport request how can we do this?
Thanks,

Hi,
Open the query in BEx in Development system, delete the variable form the query. The pop-up will arise for a new transport request. Capture the query in new request and then transport the same to Production.
Regards,
Yogesh.

Transport conection to 2 different production systems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for