Transport creation problem

When I am editing a form (in se71) and I save it, I am asked to create a transport for it. However, the only option for my transport is a local workbench request. I can not create a tranpsort that is transportable to another system. I know how to transport local requests by wrapping them in a transport of copies, but that seems like a lot of unneccesary work. I believe our Basis configuration is wrong, but our basis guy can not find a problem with it.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.

Hi Sandra,
Thanks for trying t help with my problem. I'll try and answer your questions a best I can, but I don't know how else to explain what is going on.
I can't find a more appropriate forum, so if you know which one would be better suited for Basis type questions, please let me know.
I am trying to edit a standard SAPscript form (F140_docu_exc).
You said: "I didn't understand whether you looked at the package (via SE21) to which the sapscript belongs to."
How do I find out which package the script belongs to? When saving the script, I am prompted for a "local workbench request" only. So I can not select a package or change packages or anything like that. That is my whole problem.
Our system is fairly new. It was installed about 6 months ago and most of the defaults were chose for the routing. I don't know if I need to use STMS or re-configure any routes, but something is obviously wrong and I don't know where else to change the settings. It my not be in STMS at all, but if there is someplace else, I hoping someone can tell me where that is.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Transport creation problem after upgrade

Hi
We have just upgraded and when trying to create a transport now I get the following error:
Cannot access file
kbg1bwd0\sapmnt\trans\sapnames\WATSO
Any ideas
Andy

Hi Andrew,
Can you please tell us like what are the objects that you were trying to collect in the transport request? That might help.....!
Bye...

Transport Stream Problems

My compressor keep locking up when I set it to export in "MPEG-2/Transport Stream" setting. I would like to export in this setting because I believe that this is how Toast encodes to BluRay.
Any ideas/thoughts/solutions?
Go Hornets!

I'm not sure about your transport stream problem, but Toast doesn't need it; it will use its AVCHD encoder on a regular QT movie; I exported a self contained QT movie from an FCP timeline, dragged it into the Toast window, and let it encode; it worked well.
If you send Toast a previously compressed file, it will encode it again in the AVCHD format, probably at a loss of quality.
Toast can burn the Blu Ray format to a standard DVD, giving you about 30 minutes of HD footage, and using your standard DVD burner.

Large transports a problem?

Hello Folks,
in previous projects we always went for collecting objects into transport by type buttom up e.g.
1. Infoobjects
2. Data Sources
However, now we have enabled standard transport system and get prompts for every object creation. Which is convinient for developers as you save the collection process and you don't forget any object to collect.
General idea we got is to group now objects into process deliveries e.g. shipment load -> this would then contain all DSO, Cubes, Proces chains and even queries associated with this process.
With this approach the transports can get quite packed with objects.
Are large transports of any problem? My assumption is that it simply will run a bit longer on the target and yes there might be some exercise to fix problems (dependent object is in another transport). But overall large transports will work or did anyone had negativ experience.
Thanks for all replies in advance,
Axel

>
Axel wrote:
>
> However, now we have enabled standard transport system and get prompts for every object creation. Which is convinient for developers as you save the collection process and you don't forget any object to collect.
Actually, we dont't have standard transport switched on in our system, as we don't want to collect everything we create, it has its own pros and cons.
Anyway regarding large transports, we once tried to transport 150 queries in one transport along with dataflow (in a landscape where we have several transports transported in a day across tracks). We were not able to release the transport (the reason may be as suggested by shailesh patil ) , it used to get stuck in red.
Finally we managed to take help from Basis and load it in splits
On contrary, this may be successful sometimes too.

Database creation problem on Windows XP

Hello Readers
I have installed ORACLE Database Engine on windows XP.
I am facing problem in database creation.
I have tryed wizard as well as mannual method.
in wizard at 90% it gives an error "END-OF-FILE ON COMMUNICATION CHANNEL"
although CD drive is in CR Rom drive.
Please help me ....
Rashid Masood Ashraf
email: [email protected]

After going to the properties as you suggested:
Right now the Obtain an IP address automatically is checked
I need to check the Use the following IP address:
What should I enter for
IP address:
Subnet mask:
Default gateway:
Please help.
Edited by: Nel Marcus on Dec 2, 2008 3:49 PM

Remittance challan creation problem in Cross company code scenario.

I made to Advance payment to Cross comany code while posting time we deduct the TDS amount. at the time remiottance challan creation i got bellow error.please help to me
No unpaid tax lines exist for the given selection criteria.
Message no. 8I702
Diagnosis
The corresponding withholding tax line &1& is not present in WITH_ITEM table.
System Response
For withholding tax recovered from the vendor, tax line is present in table BSIS, but the corresponding entry is missing in table WITH_ITEM , which is necessary for challan updation. Check the entries.
Procedure
check entries in table WITH_ITEM for the open tax items chosen for clearing.
Edited by: TEEGALA SATISH on Jun 15, 2010 5:43 PM

Hi ...Actually i am getting same problem in challan creation.. Did you get any solution? ...

Transport request problem

Hi all,
when releasing the transport request from developement client subrequest is released properly but when released the main request getting the error
" Test call of transport control program (tp) ended with return code 0232
    Message no. TK094
Diagnosis
    Your transport request could not be exported, since all requirements
    were not fulfilled.
    Calling the transport control program tp
       "tp EXPCHK DEVK904964 pf=/usr/sap/trans/bin/TP_DOMAIN_PRD.PFL
    -Dtransdir=/usr/sap/tr"
    which checks the export requirements, returned the following
    information:
    Return code from tp:    0232
    Error text from tp:     ERROR: Connect to DEV failed (20071030084950,
    prob "
can anyone suggest about this.
thanks in advance .
sk.

Hi SK,
As the transport log itself saying that the connection to development failed. There may be some connection issue in STMS. Ask your basis if there is any problem.
Regards,
Atish

Transport request problem with a ztable

Hello,
I have some problems releasing a customizing transport request. It contains "table contents" of a z table. This z table is marked as "customizing table" (option C).
Error message is "task desk900213 belongs to a different category"
Thanks.

Hi Alberto,
What type of request are you using. Also let me know the classification of task.
I mean if you a workbench request is giving this error then try using a customising one and if a customising one is giving this error try using workbench transport.
I guess this is related to the thread:
Re: change object transport order
Also I hope you have assigned a development class to the Z table.
Please award points accordingly.
Regards.
Ruchit.
Message was edited by:
Ruchit Khushu

Process order creation problem

I am creating a process order . while creating the process order system is throwing error as Auto batch numbering not set up for material type XXXX in plant xxxx . System is not allowing to create process order.
How to resolve the issue.

Check in CORW and switch off batch creation to isolate the problem if needed. Also see whether you have any batch managed compoents for which you have set master data for automatic batch determination.
There is no setting for material types and plant for batch. May be the error message is not correct. What is the message number?

Stock transport order problem

hai guys
<b>Requirement:</b> Supplying plant good issued valuation type should be automatically updated in the receiving plant while posting goods receipt.
1.Stock transport order created in receiving plant with valuation type V1.
2.supplying plant posting goods issue With respect to the Stock transport order with valuation type V2.
3.But in the receiving plant it is showing valuation type V1 only.i want this should be automatically updated to Valuation type V2 from the supplying plant while posting goods receipt.
<b>NOTE:</b>both valuation type V1,V2 configured both in the Supplying and receiving plant.
How to resolve the above problem.

Use TCode MBSU to recive the material in receing plant against the suppling plant document
If u do goods recipt against STO it will pick up the data from sto only ie V1 and not V2
Reward if useful

New Excise Invoice Creation - Problem

Hi All,
I am facing problem in creation of Excise Invoice. I dont know the step by step process, can any one help me to get this ?
Best Regards
Chintesh Soni

Hi Chintesh,
if you are referring to a 100% tax invoice, please see note [887917|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/887917] for 2 workarounds.
All the best,
Kerstin

Km transport related problem

Hello guys,
I have done the offline transport of km data, and as the SAP documentation says only ACL's get transported. The problem is the we are not getting the collaboration tab in folder or document details property.
We are only getting View, Actions and Settings.
I guess this problem is due to ACL so i tried giving FULL CONTROL to a user but its not working? Also in the Settings tab it only shows few options like propeties permissions versioning and templates.

I assume that 'virtual' system as QA.
So you have setup TMS using that real DEV and virtual QA. You setup transport route, create a transport and release it.
The time when you release the transport, it is already applied now in DEV. Why it should be there in DEV Import queue then ? It would be shown in that Virtual system's Import queue (second system/QA) but not in dev import queue.
In any case you need not to 'apply/import' that transport 'again' in DEV, when it is already created and released from DEV.
Thanks

Logical Standby Creation Problems "Create STatus Unknown"

We are using Grid Control 10.2.0.3 on Oracle 10.2..0.3 databases, Windows 2003 sp2 machines.
We have a primary and fsfo physical standby working properly. We went to create a logical standby on a separate server and had problems. it turned out that the listener on the server was not discovered on the target. we fixed that problem and finished the creation of the logical standby and it seems to be functioning properly now.
However, the status on the data guard page for the logical standby shows Create Status Unknown and we are unable to proceed on to create an additional standby database for other purposes. We have tried removing the logical standby target and re-discovering it but status still shows Create Status Unknown.
Is there any way to clear this status without having to drop the logical standby and completely recreate it.

The status on the agent shows it uploading successfully.
We resolved the issue by removing the logical standby from the configuration and selecting to retain the log apply. We then re-added the standby selecting to manage an existing standby database and the status went to normal.

Date of creation problem after making Bridge create TIFs with PS Image Processor.

I went through about 100 files and did what I wanted in Camera RAW (started out with NEFs). Thereafter I had Bridge make TIFs of all the files in the folder using the PS Image Processor.
Now, looking at the TIF folder in Bridge, I find that about 80 of them has a wrong creation date (I checked the Preferences and I have asked for the date of creation - and not the date of modification). As I watch (several minutes) Bridge changes some of the dates to the ones known to me to be correct - but not all. If I close Bridge, restart Bridge and open the folder again the same happens, i.e. it starts all over. Even stranger is that the Windows Pathfinder have problems with the same files - i.e. does not show the date of creation at all.
The date of these 80 files are all the same - and they have been edited over several days!
I have done a lot of work on those files and would hate to start all over. I checked and of course the dates are the original in the RAW folder that I started out with.
I am sure that I do not have any bugs in my PC.
Can I remedy this i any way? I hate to have wrong dates on my files.
What can I have done to cause this? Can anyone help me? Thanking You in advance.
Git

Thank You again.
Yes, I have also purged the cache. More than once and again this morning. It does not change the result. Bridge still goes from the date January 13th 2013 to the correct date of creation when I look at the separate thumbnails - and back again when I scroll down the page and subsequently scroll up again!
Thus it seems that Bridge knows the date that the camera set but somehow this foolish January date keeps coming back.
All the folders with NEFs have correct dates - also the ones where I have imported the files from camera to pc in 2013! Only my TIFFs have this problem.
Rigth now I am having Norton 360 run a complete system scan. When that is done I will inactivate Norton (I know that I cannot have 2 antivirus softwares and firewalls run simultaneously on the PC) and instead run a complete scan with Lavasoft Adaware Pro. I have also used Norton Utilities and found no problems. Plus Malwarebytes Antimalware and Superantispyware. No problems.
If "date file created" is the date that the file was modified, it would not help me much. I often go back to a file and play with it again and if I have understood correctly, then this date would change again. I want to see the date of capture ("date created"). Also, by now the problem afflicts at least 1000 files. It would be impossible to do single file manual corrections of dates on so many files.
Update: While I have been writing this, an opened folder with only 36 files has changed the dates to the correct date of capture. I could also scroll up and down without the dates changíng in this small folder. But when I closed Bridge, restarted it and looked at the folder again Bridge again did need minutes to get all the dates rigth. Maybe I have a pc capacity problem instead of a software problem? But why on earth would this specific wrong date result from a too weak pc.?
Maybe I should just give up and reinstall PS?
Sorry if I trouble You with a ridiculous problem.
Git

BPM Transport acknowledgment problem

Hi,
I'm making a scenarion where
Sync RFC -> 'ASync' FTP
using the BPM.
I need to know if the file transport went allright or not and will inform the user direclty.
So I've started to use the BPM's acknowledgment Transport feature, to know if it was successful transfered or not.
The 'file' is transfered however, an error occur when trying to get the acknowledge.
The message monitoring says:
2010-10-29 08:25:50     Success     Acknowledgement creation triggered for type: SystemAck
2010-10-29 08:25:50     Success     Acknowledgement creation triggered for type: AckNotSupported
2010-10-29 08:25:50     Success     Acknowledgement sent successfully for type: SystemAck
How should I interprent this error message?
Does this mean that IIS FTP server not supporting this acknowledge feature?
Do I need to do some special configuration of acknowlege messages?
ps this PBM stuff and ack part is new to me
Best regards
Tobias

Thx, but I have already read those forum threads.
I find the error strange, I can see that the file is transfered then it's seem like the process stops and wait on the acknowlegement. Then when the deadline time is up then it returns saying that it failed.
Does the FTP server need to have some special feature for getting this transport acknowledgment?
Best regards
Tobias

Transport creation problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for