Transport Groups: One Technical System targets two technical systems

Hi guys,
One question relating to transport groups.
Is it possible to define for one technical system which belongs to one group, let's say DEV, two target Business Systems which belong to another group, let's say PRD?
Meaning,
Technical System XPTO targets:
Group PRD Tech System: XPTO2
Group PRD Tech System: XPTO3
Thanks

Hi VJ,
Sorry, wrong word...I meant Tech System to 2 Tech Systems.
Having DEV System targeted to QLD and PRD tech system which are on the same group.
DEV Tech System targets to group
Group PRD : QLD Tech System
Group PRD : PRD Tech System

Similar Messages

Can One Business system have two technical systems assigned to it

Can One Business system have two technical systems assigned to it

hi,
the technical system describes the physical view and the business system the logical view, respectively.
So in most cases you must define both but while a technical system can only link to one WEB AS, more than one business systems can link to the same technical system.
But one Business System can have only one technical system.
Logical system for senders and receivers in XI can be defined as business systems which is associated with technical systems. You may req to create BS for identifying individual senders and recievers. Technical system is gateway having the technical details and it is in the ID we designate it to be either a sender or a receiver.
Follow the link below to learn moer on it:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/97/9d84494b9f45caabe0713296d89b72/content.htm
Regards
Mamta
Edited by: Mamta Yadav on Sep 12, 2008 11:13 AM

Can we connect one R/3 to two BW systems and extract data?

Can we connect one R/3 to two BW systems and extract data succesfully ? kindly through light on this issue.
Thanks and regards.
Ankush Shejul

Of course you can.
Just have to have the RFC destinations in place and use the
CALL FUNCTION '....' DESTINATION '....'
commands in ABAP, check out the ABAP forums for more info.

One Sender system and two receivers system scenario. Pls help

Hello,
I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario.
My sender is RFC (sync) in nature.
My one receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
My second receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
Pls tell me and send me links/docs for this scenario.
Regards

Hi Rick,
For two receivers you require 2 interface determination, receivers determinations etc.
Go through these threads for one sender and multiple receivers:
one sender and two receiver
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/03/xpath-to-show-the-path-multiple-receivers
Then configure your RFC communication channel in XI system + activate it and after that using all same parameters make an TCP/IP RFC destinatioon on R3 side.
Rewrads if found helpful.
BR,
Alok

I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario. Pls help

Hello,
I have One Sender system and two receivers system scenario.
My sender is RFC (sync) in nature.
My one receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
My second receiver is RFC (sync) in nature.
How to proceed with this.
If my second receiver is async then how to proceed with this.
Regards

Hi Rick !
Depending on your requierements, you can create a BPM that
1) receives request from sender
2) sends request to receiver 1 / receives response from receiver 1
3) sends request to receiver 2 / receives response from receiver 2
4) do some processing with both responses
5) sends response to sender.
If your second receiver is async, just use an async send step in step 3. As far as I know, you cannot use multimapping with sync scenarios.
Regards,
Matias.
ps: please award points if helpful

Can a R3 system connect two XI system?

Hi,gurus:
Can a R3 system connect two XI system?In SM59 we have to point the rfc to a single xi.Is it right?

If my scenario is about idoc,we can define two RFC in SM59,
and two partners in WE21 and two ports in WE20,right?
Correct..
If my scenario is about abap proxy,then we can define two RFC in SM59,
and two parameters in sxmb_adm in the R3 side,right?Then in the tcode:SPROXY,
we can see both interfaces in two XI systems,right?
this is not posssible...

ChaRM transport route, one development, 2 QA, 2 PRD system landscape

Hello,
We have a customer who has an ERP system with a transport route which is the following:
One single Development system which feeds, 2 QA systems and then 2 PRD systems.
We are to implement ChaRM and we want to customize the tickets so that every time you execute the import action of a transport request into QA (and later into PRD) both systems QA1 and QA2 are updated and later on with PR1 and PR2.
We would like to know how to support this scenario in Solution Manager using ChaRM. How do we set up the logical component at SAP, how we define the transport route and layers, and how we define the actions in the SDHF ticket.
I appreciate your help.
Regards
Esteban

Hello,
We set up a testing environment for change request management. In a solution manager we created five clients. One single development which feeds two quality systems, and final two production system. As it was said in the thread we used transport groups in the transport route. The development system feeds this transport group which feed to import queus in quality systems. We tested this transport route and transports worked well and arrives into both production 1 and production 2 systems.
Then created a logical component for that landscape, with five sytems. Then we created a maintenance project using that logical component. We created a maintenance cycle and then a task list was created which shows two delivery system, and the two productive systems. All the groups have the right actions.
However when we created a SDHF correction the system creates the task list only for 3 systems, not for the five of them.
we see that only action groups are created for development, quality 1, and production 1. No entries for quality 2 and production 2
We try to run the action which is in the general part of the task list to execute the import in multiple systems, it cames out with the correct selection of importing in quality 2 system because it is the transport group. However an error is raised saying that the actions for quality 2 are not there in the task list which is true. Finally, as short term solution, we were able to import into quality 2 and later on pr1 but done manually in the stms transactions which is not what we want to do.
Regards
Esteban Hartzstein
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:06 AM
Edited by: Esteban Hartzstein on Aug 24, 2010 2:07 AM

One Sender system and two receivers system(Sync) . Pls help

Hello All,
Help required to make one scenario in XI.
Currently there is one interface (XI is not used) that is already in place.
CRM sender system
DM and ERP Receiver systems.
CRM RFC call DM RFC directly and same CRM RFC call ERP RFC directly.
Result (can be error or correct)is returned back to CRM RFC from DM and ERP RFC's.
Now I want to make this scenario in XI.
If I make without BPM I get message 'Multiple receivers are not allowed for Sync systems in Receiver Determination.
Pls advice how to make this scenario with Error an Exception Handling.
Regard

Rick,
this makes no sense - there must be some differentiation. It woudn't be necessary only if there was one function, which first calls DM and then calls ERP and both calls would be done INSIDE this one function.
I meant, that you have only one function, which calls both systems - I mean - the same interface would call the system... Do you know what I mean?
Whatever..
I have a better solution for you. Do you know what ABAP proxies are? Let's do it this way and it will be the easiest and most reliable way.
Create 2 interfacec - one will call DM and one ERP. Develop 2 separate scenarios. No conditions - Just 2 simple scenarios. On the CRM system go to t-code sproxy. (eeee, hope you have an SAP CRM and have configured settings to be able to develop proxy objects.)
Generate proxies and replace current functions by calling the proxy objects' methods.
This is of course possible only if u have
a, CRM from SAP
b, configured settings XI<->CRM (usually does basis team)
Ok, again one thing: CHECK how your current scenario work - how are the calls made.. I believe, there are 2 different calls in one function, so when the function in CRM is ran, first call is made and then the second. But forget this general function, because it is not the interface. The interfaces are the functions which really try to send and receive data. And they simply CAN'T be the same, otherwise it wouldn't be possible for CRM to know, to which system should be the call made to!!! So, ask you colleagues for THESE TWO calls. If they tell you, no, there is only one call, which is general (which is bullshit, because it simply can't - again, there must be at least some flag or what), then just tell them - ok, this is not possible. I need a flag to be able to differentiate the messages (and this will be the condition in receiver determination) or simply let them to develop for you 2 independent function. ! for call to DM and 1 to call to ERP. You will then create 2 separate scenarios and they will use these 2 functions in their one general or whatever...
ufffff
Peter

Two Sender System and two Recievers Systems

Hi .
1) In my scenario I have 2 sender JMS systems and one JDBC receiver and one File receiver system in a single scenario.
2) Based on a key field SEND_FLAG in the JMS message of the sender,data will be forwarded to either JDBC or File .
Hear i can use BPM by using 2 receiver steps i can collect messages and send to either JDBC or File .
Client is very Specific in Neglecting BPM,
Can any one tell me is their any other method in which a single sender communication channel will be designed to fetch data from the two JMS servers.
thanks in advance
shakif

Hi,
Without BPM you can not receive 2 messages to a same interface.
Hence use the BPM and proceed further. The interface detemination condition works based on Sender Message Interface. As here there are 2 sender interfaces..so you use BPM here..
Rgds
Moorthy

Question Related to Source System of BI7 Technical Content

Hi Experts,
I activated BI7 Technical contents using SPRO Transaction.
Activation is successfull.
My question is that I could now find two source systems for
each activated Datasource of Technical Content(One BI self source system and another R3 source system).Is that right?
I thought that BI statistics wil be based on only BI as a
source system.
Please help me in this.
Thanks,
Senoy
Edited by: senoy laxman on Aug 19, 2008 3:29 PM

This is because, before actiavtion of technical content, those TWO source systems were already assigned (Check Boxes 'ON')...under
RSA1 --> Business Content --> 'EDIT" menu --> Source System Assignment --> see those check boxes 'ON' for BI self source system and R3 source system.
U r right..BI statistics wil be based on only BI as a source system.

Automatic transport in Two QUA systems

Hi to all;
I have one development system and two QUAs systems. If I release the order go to two QUAS systems.
I need for example if import manually the order in the first QUAS system, that automatic the order will be import in the second QUAS system.
It´s possible? any help or idea?
Best reagards

So in that case what you can do is change you STMS setting a little bit. So you setting would look something like this :
DEV -> QA1 -> PRD
-> QA2
So DEV to QA1 and then once transport is imported into QA1 then it will be added to the queue of QA2 and PRD.
In this way untill and unless the transport is not imported to QA1 it will not be imported automatically to QA2 and for PRD you can always use whatever your process is.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Naveed

New tax code transport to one server to another

Hi all,
Could you please let me know for transporting customisation like new tax code from development to testing and testing to production what is the procedure and which type of request it need customisation request or workbench request.
Regards,
nitin

Important note on transporting tax codes -> F1
Message no. F4794
Diagnosis
Transporting tax codes requires manual postprocessing. This postprocessing is also necessary if tax codes have to be transported from one client to another within the system.
Procedure
When tax codes are transported, the tax rates of the tax codes are transported using auxiliary table T007V. Logical transport object FTXP is used to transport the definition data of the tax code from table T007A and the language-dependent name to table T007S.
The tax accounts for the tax codes (table T030K) are not transported.
The internal jurisdiction codes are also not transported.
The transport of tax codes between systems or clients consists of two steps:
1. Step:
Export tax codes from source system or source client
2. Step:
Import tax codes into target system or target client
Export
1. In the source system or client, in Customizing for the Financial Accounting Basic Settings, choose Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Calculation -> Define Tax on Sales and Purchases Code.
2. Choose Tax Code -> Transport -> Export.
3. Assign the export to the relevant transport request and make a note of the request number.
4. Select and save the tax codes to be transported.
5. Make sure that the selected tax codes have the transport number in table T007V.
To check the table, in the SAP menu choose Tools -> ABAP Workbench -> Overview -> Data Browser.
Enter the table name. The tax codes are in the MWSKZ fields, the tax jurisdiction codes in the TXJCD fields.
6. Arrange the transport of the request to the target system.
To transport the request, in the SAP menu choose Tools -> ABAP Workbench -> Overview -> Workbench Organizer -> Environment -> Customizing Organizer.
Import
1. Make sure that the transported tax codes are recorded in table T007V of the target system or target client.
2. In the source system or client, in Customizing for the Financial Accounting Basic Settings, choose Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Calculation -> Define Tax on Sales and Purchases Code.
3. The tax codes should have been created in the target system without a tax percentage rate by the import.
Otherwise you can do this manually:
In the target system, create the tax codes that do not exist there.
Create the tax codes completely, but without tax percentage rates.
If you use internal systems in company codes in the USA or Canada, the relevant tax jurisdiction codes should also exist. You make the settings for the tax jurisdiction code in Customizing for Financial Accounting Basic Settings under Tax on Sales and Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Define Tax Jurisdiction Codes.
4. Choose Tax Code -> Transport -> Import.
5. Check the proposed values for the transport request and country.
6. Run the import.
Notes for the transport of tax accounts
When you transport tax codes between different systems or clients, no tax accounts are transported.
Adjust the tax accounts in the source and target system (or source and target client) manually.

Creating Source systems in two same logical BW systems from single R/3 sys

Hi All,
We are facing an issue while creating Source systems in two same logical BW systems, from single R/3 systems. Our Basis team is telling that if we want to connect the single R/3 system into 2 BW systems with same logical name, we will need to delete the source systems from one BW systems and create in another system. Also they told by doing so it will delete all the transfer rules and PSA table existing in the current BW system, which has the source system connectivity with the R3 system now.
Is this anyway to create the same source systems in two same logical BW systems, from single R/3 systems without deleting the transfer rules?. Also please help us to get anu OSS note or document explaining this in details.
Regards.
Muruganand.K

Hi Muruganand,
I dont think it is possible as connecting one R/3 Source System to two BW Systems.
If you could get the possible solution, please do reply to the post.
Regards,
Kiran

R/3 connected to two BW systems ...

Hello,
I would like to know is it possible to connect an R/3 system to two BW systems ?
Please advise,
Dimitry Haritonov

Hi dear,
take a look to OSS Note 775568 'Two and more BW systems against one OLTP system'...
Hope it helps!
Bye,
Roberto
...and please don't forget to reward the answers...it's THE way to say thanks here !

Three system TMS in one transport group, error tp parameter in QAS

Hi,
There is 3 system TMS, which is DEV (phycial system,transport domain controller), QAS (virtual system), PRD (virtual system).
And I tried to replace the virtual QAS with the phycial QAS with these steps:
1. excute STMS in DEV,delete the virtual QAS
2. in QAS, configure STMS with transport domain_DEV
3. in DEV,approve QAS as the sytem of transport domain_DEV (the QAS shows with transport group QAS)
4. changed the QAS transport group from group QAS to group DEV
5. configure and active the transport route as standard 3 system TMS
after the below steps, I checked system overview in STMS, in QAS, the tp parameter shows the transport directory is the local trans directory, not the transport directory in DEV. That's why I I can not find any transport queue in QAS system.But the file TP_DOMAIN_DEV also exist in the trans\bin directory of QAS.
after that,
1.I added the full authorization of trans directory for user sapserviceDEV and sapserviceQAS,
2.I cleared the files in the trans directory of QAS
3.I cleared the configuration of QAS,and reconfigued it
But I got the same error message.
Note: when I install the QAS,I fill in the hostname of QAS as the transport host.
How can I fix it?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Randy

Hello Randy,
May be there is something wrong in how the set up in TMS for QAS was done. Please refer this link and ensure all steps were taken:
Re: STMS Configuration - Change Virtual System with Real System
I mean did you delete STMS in QAS originally?
Regards.
Ruchit.

Transport Groups: One Technical System targets two technical systems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for