Transport in XI system

Can any one tell...
How to do transports in XI system?
Thanks in Advance

For Abap Stack it is the same and for Java stack check this document
[Transport |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f85ff411-0d01-0010-0096-ba14e5db6306]
Regards
Subhash

Similar Messages

  • Probelms while replicating Data Source and transport into test system

    I find  the following error messages whilre transporting into test system.
    DataSource 0EC_PCA_1 does not exist in source system of version A.
    Mapping between data source 0EC_PCA_1 and source system  is inconsistent.
    DataSource 0EC_PCA_1 does not exist in source system  of version A.
    Field AFABE will not be delivered from DataSource 0EC_PCA_1 in source system.
    any ideas please..........
    Enhanced the Extract structure and activated the data source in Source system
    Replicate the Data source in BI  and install the Infosource through BI Content  activated and transport them to Test system.

    Hi,
    1.First transport the data source from R/3 dev to R/3 quality
    2.Replicate the data source in BI Quality ( make sure you that in the data source tab, you are searching the data source below the appropriate source system ---otherwise you  data source may not appear)
    3.goto rsd1in BI development for activataing the info objects which you have added extra in the info source (z info objects )
      activate these info objects and collect in another request
    4.transport these info objects from BI dev to  BI quality
    5.transport entire data source to bw quality.
    Thanks,
    Tarun Brijwani.
    Edited by: Tarun Brijwani on Apr 6, 2009 4:26 PM
    Edited by: Tarun Brijwani on Apr 6, 2009 4:26 PM

  • Condition doesn't work after transport to QAS system.

    Hi all:
          the condition doesn't work after the workflow transported to QAS system.  the workflow designed has a constraint that only the creation of the document of Type M4 can trigger the workflow, but creation of Type M5 document can also trigger the workflow, could you please tell me the possible reason?
    Thank you very much

    Hi,
    Once Try checking as pavan suggested whether the Customizing requested is transported.
    To Maintain Workflow start conditions you can also maintain through SWB_COND and ensure its transported.
    Regards
    Narin

  • Exit Fm is not to CMOD project but transported to test system

    Hi.
    I have a enhancement MWMIDO08 with contains function module EXIT_SAPLLMDE_002 and which incldes program ZXLIDU10.
    I made my necessary changes in the include program and  transported to test system, without creating any CMOD project.
    But my changes are working fine in test test.
    Can you please suggest me, what to do now? if i want create a CMOD project now and add the function exit into it. and resend the new request to test system.
    Does it create any problem.

    This sort of thing can happen if someone has assigned a CMOD project to the enhancement containing the user exit before.
    First check in SE16, table MODACT with MODACT-MEMBER = 'MWMIDO08', then MODACT-NAME will give you the existing project that is already assigned to enhancement MWMIDO08
    If there is no entry in MODACT then you can safely create another project and assign the enhancement to it, activate and transport.
    If already there is an entry in MODACT, you need to check if the same entry exists in your QA and Prod systems, to verify if someone already transported it. If it is not transported you need to deactivate / activate the project and transport that project again.
    No this should not cause any problem and I can tell from experience having done same thing before.
    Best regards,
    Vishnu Tallapragada

  • Transport of Business System in IDoc scenarios.

    HI All,
    I am doing IDoc scenarios so I am using Business System say PIS_800 . Now i have moved these scenarios to quality system and my Business System name is supposed to be PIQ_800.
    I am using simply file import-export for transport. After transport my Business System name is coming as PIS_800 only.
    Can anybosy plz suggest me how to change it to PIQ_800? This part is quite new to me so detailed explaination will be helpful.
    Thanks,
    Atul.

    Hi Atul,
    In DEV
    1) Export the TS & BS of SAP R/3
    2) Export the TS & BS of DEV XI Server
    In QTY
    1)Import the TS & BS of SAP R/3
    2) Import the TS & BS of DEV XI Server
    3) Create the TS for Quality SAP R/3 & Corresponding BS also which is pointing the QTY Server Details
    Now create the Transport Groups and Targets
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ef/a21e3e0987760be10000000a114084/content.htm
    With this Configuration, the DEV BS will be replaced by the QTY BS.
    Thats all
    Regards
    Seshagiri

  • Transports in PI System

    Hello All,
    Can you please suggest me the options for Client and Transports in PI system.
    Basically we are planning just one client in PI system in all landscapes (Dev-TEST-QAS-PROD).
    Does PI need some kind of communication or Data from ERP ,CRM ,BI system??
    What about the Java Objects or XI object which are required to be transported??
    Found something like manual transports and CMS.
    We have no plans for NWDI??
    Pls suggest how we should approach this!!
    Regards
    Ajay

    Hi
    The design Objects are transported one system to other system using file transport method
    Choose export the Design Objects from the tools menu.
    Choose the source (The Software Component Version)
    Mode can be "Transport using File System"
    Check "Download File to Client"
    Then Select the objects for example "All objects of a Software Component Version"
    Then is would start exporting to the location you specifiy.
    After the export is over, you can import this into the target TEST, QA, PRD by using tools-> import Design objects.
    Note:
    Connection to ECC is not necessary duting transport. However after transaport, for testing the connection should be established.
    In SLD, technical systems and business systems should be created.
    In ID, objects should point to exact system for which testing is needed. All the ID objects should be manually created like Sender Agreement, Receiver Agreement, Receiver Determiantion, Interface Determination.
    The other option is CTS+
    Regards
    Monika

  • Best Practice: Migrating transports to Prod (system down etc.)

    Hi all
    This is more of a process and governance question as opposed to a ChaRM question.
    We use ChaRM to migrate transports to Production systems. For example, we have a Minor BAU Release (every 2 weeks), a Minor Initiative Release (every 4 weeks) and a Major Release (every 3 months).
    We realise that some of the major releases may require SAP to be taken offline. But what is SAP Best practice for ANY release into Production? i.e. for our Minor BAU Release we never shut down any Production systems, never stop batch jobs, never lock users etc.
    What does SAP recommend when migrating transports to Prod?
    Thanks
    Shaun

    Have you checked out the "Two Value Releases Per Year" whitepaper for SAP recommendations?  Section 6 is applicable.
    Lifetime Support by SAP » Two Value Releases per Year
    The "real-world" answer is going to depend on how risk-adverse versus downtime adverse your company is.  I think most companies would choose to keep the systems running except when SAP forces an outage or there is a real risk of data corruption (some data conversions and data loads, for example).
    Specific to your minor BAU releases, it may be wise to make a process whereby anything that requires a production shutdown, stopped batch jobs, locked users, etc. needs to be in a different release type. But if you don't have the kind of control, your process will need to allow for these things to happen with those releases.
    Also, with regards to stopping batch jobs in the real world, you always need to balance the desire to take full advantage of the available systems versus the pain of managing the variations.  If your batch schedule is full, how are you going to make sure the critical jobs complete on time when you do need to take the system down?  If it isn't full, why do you need that time?  Can you make sure only non-critical batch jobs run during those times?  Do you have a good method of implementing an alternate batch schedule when need be?

  • Moving transport to different systems and different mandants

    Hi all,
    I'm new to sap transport managment, so I hope this is not too obvious question.
    I've this kind of hypothetical situation. I have one develoopment system and 2 quality. On development system I have mandants 100, 200 and 300. On quality 1 I have mandants 100 and 200, and on quality 2 only 100.
    DEV: 100, 200, 300
    QL1: 100, 200
    QL2: 100
    Transport routes should go like this
    DEV 100 -> QL1 100
    DEV 200 -> QL1 200
    DEV 300 -> QL2 100
    What is important is that I would like to have it all within one transport layer. How it can be done? Is it connected with Standard Transport Layer?
    Best regards
    Marcin Cholewczuk

    Hi Mark,
    Thank you for response, I thought that target groups work differently. For example
                                             ------100--------> QL1
    DEV --------------> /CUST target group/  ------200--------> QL1
                                             ------100--------> QL2
    I thought that in such case when someone release transport in DEV system than this transport is being imported (after import operation) to all 3 locations (QL1 100, QL1 200 and QL2 100). So if in DEV system I release something in mandant 100 it will go to all 3 locations, if I release it in mandant 200 it will also go to all 3 locations and so on.
    Second question would be how to enforce that data from DEV 300 goes to QL2 100 (change of mandant).
    Best regards
    Marcin Cholewczuk

  • Transport type when copying transports to other system

    Hello,
    probably a simple question. I have to transport couple transports from one system to another, there is no link between the systems.
    I have created one (mass) transport which include objects of these transports, but I am not sure what type of the transport should I choose (transport of copies, relocations (it is not clear to me)), also I do not want to release the one big transport to Q systems transport queue. I just want it to create the cofiles to move to other system.
    So question will be how to copy this one transport (via cofile, data file), or if it is possible to release transport without target system?
    Thanks in advance
    Martin

    Hi,
    Please ensure that STMS is configured in your system, since it is a stand alone system you can make it as a Domain Controller also. After that goto transaction se10 and check for the transaction which are in modifiable state. Then relese the transport starting from the inner request corresponding the transport request created by you.
    Note that once you release this trasaction data files and cofiles are created in trans directory, and you have to manullay copy these files to the system in which you want to transport these files.
    After that goto transaction stms_impot in the target system and add this transport request and import it. the data in the transport reuest will qutomatically gets imported the.
    Thanks
    Rattandeep

  • Error in collecting transfer Rules in transport request after system copy

    Hello,
    Recently we had a system copy from Production to Test system.
    We are trying to collect all the transfer rules from production in the transport request with the procedure which is given in the below link.
    Re: Q: Transfer Rules after system copy
    When we are trying to transport such objects, system first prompt for transportable workbench request, after specifying request once, it prompts for it again and after providing transport request number system results with message u201CSpecify a requestu201D.
    Please suggest how to overcome this issue.

    thats scary that you are copying your transfer rules from production to test system well if you guy sare doing it good luck..
    a part from that make sure your prd is open so it allows items to be able to transport an dthere is a conenction between prd to test for transports to go through
    if you have already copied all te data source to TEST, replicate them IN BWQ( your test system) then send over tranfer fules .
    hope that helps.

  • Transports backup during system refresh

    I have a requirement to take the backup of transports from QA system which are not yet imported into PRD as QA is getting refreshed.  After refresh, I would like to add these transports into queue and import them in sequence.
    Now I can get the list of transports not imported into PRD from "transports waiting to be imported" from PRD system.  But I am unable to get in which sequence should these be imported into QA.  Last time I did but it went in the wrong order and programs got overwritten in QA as I tried to do it by the time/date sequence.
    I wish to know if anyone following the better procedure to take the transports backup in QA during the refresh process.

    Hi Sameer,
    2 things: Either these TRws are being imported for the first time, OR, you are concerned about the repeat import.
    1.
    Usually, the order of import is the same as order of release of the TR from development. However, there may be exceptions in some cases.
    But why are you being worried about the order of the transports? The developers should have a look at the list and tell you the order in which they are to be imported. See, only they would know which request contains which versions of the objects and only they can tell you what goes in and in what order.
    Being from Basis (I hope you are from basis only) you have no way of knowing the correct sequence in such a case. Basis never decides order of TRs.
    2.
    But, if you mean these were imported once in Q but after refresh you want the same order, then you should have gone to the transport history for the system in STMS and from there, you should have seen and saved the order of the original imports.
    Regards,
    Shitij

  • Process Chain Triggered automatically when transported to test system

    Hi All,
    We modified several process chain and transported the process chain to Test system.
    Few Process chain triggered automatically as the varient was set to immediate in development system.
    Now we want to move the process chain to production. Do we need
    1. new transport request with the variant to future date and discard the transport request which created issues
    2. New transport request with the variant to future date and transport the new along with the old transport to production system
    3. Change the start date in Test system and transport the same request to production
    Kindly advice me on the action to be taken.

    >
    > Hi All,
    >
    > We modified several process chain and transported the process chain to Test system.
    > Few Process chain triggered automatically as the varient was set to immediate in development system.
    > Now we want to move the process chain to production. Do we need
    >
    > 1. new transport request with the variant to future date and discard the transport request which created issues
    > 2. New transport request with the variant to future date and transport the new along with the old transport to production system
    > 3. Change the start date in Test system and transport the same request to production
    >
    > Kindly advice me on the action to be taken.
    Regarding 2: When the old transport is imported into production the start will be set to immediately and the process chain will execute. You should not use this option.
    Regarding 3: Changing in Test system will not affect the content of the transport, it will still be the same as released from Dev.
    We have avoided this annoying problem with process chains being executed when transports are imported by creating a "parent" process chain that simply triggers the process chain in question. This "parent" chain should not be transported. You then set the start option for the original process chain to "start by API/Event" then you can transport the original process chain whenever you want without any risk of the process chain being executed.
    Regards,
    Lars

  • ChaRM Action 'Transport into Sandbox System'

    Hi,
    How the action 'Transport into Sandbox System' works.
    Wanted to know how this action works & in TMS do we need to map sandbox client.
    From sand

    Hi PK,
    answer is Yes for the STMS and also you need to have a system defined as single type within maintenance cycle you re working in. Solman will be using your tasklist structure to understand which system is supposed to receive the import
    Since a couple of stacks it became possible to actually define the role type of system that is supposed to receive the import of TR. I mean by role type the kind of system like you define in STMS when declaring a logical component
    Regards
    Khalil

  • ChaRM SPAU Adjustements transport on managed system upgrade

    Hi,
    We are suing ChaRM 7.1 to manage our transports in our ERP 6.0 landscape. That landscape is now being upgraded to EhP7 and we've just completed the upgrade in DEV.
    Here's my question; How are we supposed to handle the SPAU Adjustment if we want SUM to automatically move that transport to subsequent systems QA-PROD.
    Are we supposed to handle the transport using ChaRM or let the SUM tool process the transport automatically going forward?
    Thanks
    Stephane

    Hi Syed,
    If the RFC connection from Solution Manager to ERP system connects with the current user, then the user who is performing this step in solution manager is missing the authorization in ERP system.
    If the RFC connection is with an RFC user, then check the permissions of the RFC user in ERP system.
    You can check which user is accessing the RFC connection in SM59.
    S_RFC and S_RFCACL are the auth objects which are missing in ERP system. Provide the access and then check.
    Regards,
    Laxman

  • Is the complete query overwritten once it is transported to another system?

    Hi,
    I had developed a query with some variables on the infoset. This has been transported to the production system.
    But due to some requirement change the infoset was impacted due to the changes made in the ODS. (on which the infoset was created).
    So the infoobjects technical names of ODS in the Infoset had changed. (F1 to F11....). Due to this the variables which were built on this infoobjects after the change are showing up under different infoobjects after technical name change.
    Now to solve the issue, if i delete the variables and create under their respective infoobjects and transport to production system, will this work? Will the varaibles which were already transported to production system deleted automatically after the query is again transported to the production system?
    Please help
    Thanks,
    Rani

    Hi Rani,
    Make sure u include the deletion change in the transport.
    when u delete the variable it will ask for trnasport.
    and also to ensure all ur changes are in the transport go to transport connection in RSA1. In that ->object types->query element->find ur query and trasnfer it.
    make the grouping as 'only necessary objects'.
    it will give u the list make sure it is all present in ur transport.
    u can see the transport number in the rightmost window.
    If u see all are not included tick and use the 'transport' -truck icon on topic.click on that and assign the transport.
    hope it helps
    Regards,
    Rathy

Maybe you are looking for