Transport not Release in QA

Hi,
I am Angeline, I having problem in BI Transport Release issue, under windows 2003 server, BI 7.0, when I release Transport in DEV system, some objects have been released to QA, but when I look at in QA system thats does't exist there...
is that anyone tell me step by step procedure to checking... transport...
Thanks a lot in Advanced

Hi Angeline,
Releasing transport will not make the objects available in the next system you have to import the transport request in the QA system for the objects to be available.
STEPS
1- Create transportable tranport request .local request will be released but will not be transported to the next system.
2- release the request in the Development system and check the log for the success of the transport.
3- login to the next system and execute tcode stms_import you can see the released transport request in the quality system queue.select the request and import check the log for success.
4 - then check for the objects.
Regards
Ashok Dalai

Similar Messages

Mail.jar is locked when sending a mail using servlet and not releasing

Hi everybody,
The mail.jar is locked in tomcat while sending the first message and not released until the tomcat get restarts.
the problem is not recorded in any logs.
1. Please create a servlet that sends mail
2. Send a mail to any mailid
3. then after the mail is send please try to delete the mail.jar or please deploy the same servlet again with some small changes (for redeploying take place only a few changes is there - please change any strings a little bit)
then try to send mail using this servlet will not send mail becoause it will not redployed correctely.
when i removed Transport.send(msg); from code it works fine. but ??
please help me to recover from this issue. i don't want to turn on tomcat antiJarlocking and antiresourcelocking to true, becaouse this craete many other problems.
please help me to recover from this issue.
Thanks,
Prasad.N

hi friend
I am using advanced version of jdk. i i have used many other jar files like mysqlconnector, logging, commonhttpclient, etc.... the only problem is with mail.jar. that locks are released when its use completed, but the lock holds until tomcat shutdown in mail.jar.
what may be the reason?
Thanks,
Prasad.N

Cannot create STO due to Material Not released

Hi experts,
I have a query here.
A part number has block code BL (Blocked) in MM in MRP1 & Costing views. Because of which we cannot create Intercompany Stock Transport Orders.
However it allows us to create normal PO's for the same part to the vendors. The material status of this block code BL has only Inventory Mgmnt blocked with "B" whereas rest of the settings
Material 82001 cannot be taken from plant 1001 due to status "Not Released"
Message no. ME125
System Response
Procedure (system administrator)
Check the material status in Customizing:
Define material status
Could you let me know why it behaves differently in normal PO to that of Intercompany Stock Transport Orders?
Regards,
Pri

I dont know the reason, but probably it is to to avoid potential business trouble, to inform requesters at the earliest time that the supplying plant cannot delivery what you request.
Assume you would create STO today for a delivery in November.
You would be lucky because you succefully created the STO.
In November someone in the sending plant would starf processing the goods issue to you, would then realize that it is not possible, would then inform you about that.
you would get in trouble with your customer, as you cannot meet the promised delivery date.
Wouldn't you ask him why he did not tell you that in August already?
But the sending plant has no chance to know this prior to the processing (except they would lookup manually everytime the material master status when you send an order).
So the easisest way to let you know that it is not possible to move material in the sending plant, is thru the message at order creation.
As I said, it is just my assumption. You may ask SAP for the correct answer. Maybe another one here knows it.
Can it be that you do not use delivery processing for this STOs?

Can i transport PO Release strategy in a request

Hi Gurus,
I have done po release starategy in dev can i transport the release strategy in a request to quality client or should i do the same setting again in quality server.
Regards,
Dheepak

hI
1- Release classification is a master data which you can not transport and need to maintain in each client.
2- Goto Txn -- CL24n in Qly or PRD
3- Enter release class and class type then enter ,there you will get all your strategies select the strategy you want to maintain and details there you can maintain the values.

Biller Direct Issue BP not released

We have performed the configuartion for Biller Direct.
When we log on we get the following error message
You are not authorized to execute this function, as your business partner has not released it for you.
Has anyone seen this before, if so how do you resolve this.
We have given the user in R/3 access to all FSCM delivered roles.

Hi Nrisimhanadh,
Can you please confirm whether you had performed following steps.
1) for the SC FSCM_BD, you had defined it's build-time dependencies in SLD.
2) After that you have updated the CMS.
3) Then, you added the FSCM_BD to your Track and Saved the Track. And while saving the track you had chosen "Save & Reimport" options.
4) Make sure you have placed the FSCM_BD sca into CMS/inbox folder at OS level.
5) Then, from the CMS Transport Studio you had you had checked-In those Components from Check-In Tab.
6) And then, imported the Components into Development and Consolidation Tabs.
7) Now, if you import the Track configuration into your developer studio, it must bring all your Build time dependecies as well all ther DCs that you need to modify.
If you have missed any of the above mentioned steps, then correct it.
One more input, also check whether the Developer ID that you are working with has the "NWDI.Developer" UME role assigned to it.
Let me know about your findings.
Regards,
Shreyas Pandya

Request having function group released but function module attribute shows not released

Hi experts,
I am a beginner.
There is a transport request in which my function group and other objects were present . This transport request and its task were released . But if i check the attributes section of the function module that is present in that function group , it shows not released .
Is there some problem ? did the function module not get released with its group? It wasn't showing anywhere in the request even though i had added it during creation.
Here is the image :
Thanks,
Unnati

Hi,
Those two meanings of 'released' are unrelated. Don't worry about it.
Also, a function module sometimes does not explicitly appear in a transport request, if the function group is already in there.
cheers
Paul

Transport of release strategies

Hello all
Could anybody explain me how to transport release strategies (classification)? I found the note 45951, but is not clear for me.
First, how do I have to save the changes on SPRO-Material management-Purchasing-Purchase requisition-Release procedure-Procedure with classification-Set up procedure with classification-Release strategies? I tried with menu Table view-transport is this correct? if not, how do I have to do?
Then, when I have a transport number which are the following steps?
Could anybody help me?
Thank you in advance.

Hi Henrique,
The transport of Customizing data in the release procedure area 'Release strategies' can only be used in a restricted manner. The 'Transport' function displayed in Customizing under 'Table view' only takes the
release strategies into account but not the dependent data of the release prerequisites, the release statuses and classification data.
If you want to transport release strategies, proceed as described below:
1. Transport of release strategies (entries in table T16FS)
Use the transport function Customizing under 'Table view' - 'Transport'.
2. Transport of Release prerequisites (entries in table T16FV)
You can display all required entries of table T16FV which contains the release prerequisites for the corrresponding release strategy using the table display Transaction SE16 specifying the release group to be transported and the release strategy. Implement these table entries manually in a transport request.
   Program ID:                   R3TR
   Object type of the element:   TABU
   Object name:                  T16FV
   Client                           Client
   Release group                 Release group
   Release strategy              Release strategy
   Release code                  *
3. Transport of Release statuses (entries in table T16FK)
You can display all required entries of the table T16FK which contains the release statuses for the corresponding release strategy using the table display of Transaction SE16 specifying the release group to be transported and the release strategy.
Implement these table entries manually into a transport request.
   Program ID:                     R3TR
   Object type of the element:     TABU
   Object name:                    T16FK
   Client                          Client
   Release group                   Release group
   Release strategy                Release strategy
   Release code                    *
4. Transport of classification data into release strategy
Read Note 45951.
Transport class type 032 (release strategy), the class, which you use for the release procedure, and the characteristics which are assigned to this class.
>> Above instructions extracted from note 86900 <<
Hope it helps to solve the issue!
Cheers,
Eduardo Junior

Billing Document Not releasing to Accounting because of Condition Type

Hi,
We have used Sales Condition Type ZSCM(Which is a statistical condition type) in Billing Documents and they are already released to Accounting.Today we have created one more Billing Document with same Condition type ZSCM.But this billing document is not getting released to Accounting?
What could be the reason? Why it was released to Accounting before with the same condition type ZSCM and why it is not getting released to Accounting this time.
I am breaking my head to find the possible reasons...kindly help me out to find the problem.
1.Billing document 90005889 - has value 64.48462- and It has only 2 Items and it was released to accounting
2.Billing document 90005729 - has value 217.87960- and It has only 21 Items and it was not released to accounting and asking to activate +/- sing in KE4I transaction for the ZSCM condition type.
Why billing document 90005889 is released for accounting and why 90005729 was not released to accounting?
Thanks
Supriya

Hi,
There can be following possible reasons fo the samed :
1. If the specific GL account is not getting any assignment to CO object.
2. Also you need to check assignment with VKOA that whichever GL is assigned as per business process of Sales (the account which is going to be credited) and all relevant settings in VKOA.
3. Pls check all substitutions and validations if any connected with that condition type and GL. Becuase sometimes it may happen that because of calling some other application (for ex. Set or substitution as generally transportation of this element happen with entire hierarchy if you add your substition in the node.) at he time of posting of billing document. This has already happen with our business scenario.
4. Also check if this sales revenue GL is assinged to any set and if that set is called through any substitution ot validation.
Pls check all these possibilities and revert.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

ReleaseRequest failed with error code 0x80004005 \ Task Sequence Manager could not release active TS request. code 80004005

Hi All,
I am trying to deploy an OS but the deployment is failing part way through. I have searched the logs and identified the error: Task Sequence Manager could not release active TS request. code 80004005
If anyone could assist with this is would be much appreciated.
Many thanks
Logs below:
<![LOG[Unlocked ActualConfig successfully]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="policyutil.cpp:7898">
<![LOG[Unlocked policy transaction lock successfully]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="policyutil.cpp:7904">
<![LOG[Raising event:
instance of CCM_PolicyAgent_SettingsEvaluationComplete
ClientID = "GUID:8388E2E2-7642-4436-88D0-FC9335F6D56E";
DateTime = "20141218122103.273000+000";
PolicyNamespace = "\\\\wst0339\\root\\ccm\\policy\\machine\\actualconfig";
ProcessID = 1748;
ThreadID = 1752;
]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="event.cpp:729">
<![LOG[Successfully submitted event to the Status Agent.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="event.cpp:747">
<![LOG[End TS policy evaluation]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="policyutil.cpp:10580">
<![LOG[Policy evaluation initiated]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:3387">
<![LOG[Sending success status message]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanager.cpp:659">
<![LOG[MP server http://LONSVR0150.uk.ham.local. Ports 80,443. CRL=false.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.273+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4855">
<![LOG[Setting authenticator]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.288+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4877">
<![LOG[Set authenticator in transport]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.288+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:7592">
<![LOG[Sending StatusMessage]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.304+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:4020">
<![LOG[Setting message signatures.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.320+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:1292">
<![LOG[Setting the authenticator.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.320+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:1322">
<![LOG[CLibSMSMessageWinHttpTransport::Send: URL: LONSVR0150.uk.ham.local:80 CCM_POST /ccm_system/request]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.320+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1"
thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:8422">
<![LOG[Request was succesful.]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="libsmsmessaging.cpp:8758">
<![LOG[Finalize logging request ignored from process 1748]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tslogging.cpp:1737">
<![LOG[Waiting for CcmExec service to be fully operational]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4019">
<![LOG[CcmExec service is up and fully operational]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="utils.cpp:4024">
<![LOG[Access handle will be read from _SMSTSActiveRequestHandle]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:99">
<![LOG[Access handle: {9F9B91DA-055D-4B32-9817-52C369835080}]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:111">
<![LOG[Attempting to release request using {9F9B91DA-055D-4B32-9817-52C369835080}]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.351+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752"
file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:118">
<![LOG[CoCreateInstance succeeded]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="1" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:133">
<![LOG[pISoftwareExecutionRequestMgr->ReleaseRequest(ActiveRequestGUID), HRESULT=80004005 (e:\nts_sccm_release\sms\client\tasksequence\tsmanager\tsmanagerutils.cpp,136)]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager"
context="" type="0" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:136">
<![LOG[ReleaseRequest failed with error code 0x80004005]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="3" thread="1752" file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:136">
<![LOG[Task Sequence Manager could not release active TS request. code 80004005]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.382+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSManager" context="" type="2" thread="1752"
file="tsmanagerutils.cpp:165">
<![LOG[Process completed with exit code 0]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSMBootstrap" context="" type="1" thread="1728" file="commandline.cpp:1098">
<![LOG[Exiting with return code 0x00000000]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="TSMBootstrap" context="" type="1" thread="1728" file="tsmbootstrap.cpp:1032">
<![LOG[Process completed with exit code 0]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="commandline.cpp:1098">
<![LOG[Task sequence completed 0x00000000]LOG]!><time="12:21:03.413+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1384">
<![LOG[Uninstalling Setup Hook]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1427">
<![LOG[Removing setup hook from registry.]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="0" thread="788" file="vistasetuphook.cpp:143">
<![LOG[Successfully removed C:\WINDOWS\system32\OSDGINA.DLL]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1183">
<![LOG[Successfully removed C:\WINDOWS\system32\OSDSETUPHOOK.EXE]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1183">
<![LOG[Successfully removed C:\WINDOWS\system32\_SMSOSDSetup]LOG]!><time="12:21:06.552+00" date="12-18-2014" component="OSDSetupHook" context="" type="1" thread="788" file="basesetuphook.cpp:1220">

4005 can mean a few things, Some common can be The wrong BIOS time, or a a bad Hard drive. look at those two first.

Large number of transport request released from Dev

Hello Gurus,
Our Landscape for Dev consist of three clients. We do development in one client and the testing teams test it in another client. We maintained all these clients in a route which takes around 10 mins to reach after releasing a transport and when testing team fails the test then we correct the error and again create a fresh transport and release it. I understand at some point we are going to reach Maximum number of transports.
Normally, If the tesing team fails the test two times. I create a test role in a testing client and request the user to test it. When everything goes well then I insert it into original role. But all this stuff takes time.
Please advise if there is any other way also to cut this short.
Regards,
MA

Hello,
>
Salman123 wrote:
> I understand at some point we are going to reach Maximum number of transports.
The number range for transports is alphanumeric (over 40 million free numbers are available ). Have a look at sap note [106911|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap%28bD1kZSZjPTAwMQ==%29/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=10691] for details.
>
Salman123 wrote:
> Please advise if there is any other way also to cut this short
You could copy customizing transport requests via transaction SCC1. But personally I would not recommend this.
Cheers
Joerg

Lock Role for Changes till the transport is released

Issue : since roles are managed by multiple security administrators, changes are moving against the sequence.
We have multiple security administrators, is there a way to lock a role for changes until the task/ req is released.
Example Scenario :
Security admin 1 : if there is a change request to add SU01 to the role: Z_TESTROLE, Security admin adds it and creates a Change request but does not release it.
Security Admin 2 : the security admin 2 will get a Change req for the same role Z_TESTROLE to add a tcode PFCG to it. Security admin 2 does his job and moves his transport now even though the first transport does not move the change made by the first security admin moves with the transport for the second admin.
We have multiple security administrators, is there a way to lock a role for changes until the task/ req is released.

Hi all,
Thanks for your responses.we follow a change procedure but I guess its just needs to be refined. Everybody figured out that this is a coordination issue but I was asked to research on any technical ability to handle this.
Here is a brief overview of our process :
1) BPO approves the change
2) Role owner support manager approves the change
then the Change request comes to 3)Security Manager for her approval.
I feel from Sox prespective the 3rd approval in not manadatory.
I'm I correct ??? where can I find Sox guide for SAP ?
Recap of the incident:
1)A change ticket is created for the t-code creation and a task is created for the role in which this report is to be added.
State I role Z_TESTROLE is with ZMMR0025
After adding the new report ZMMR0055 the old report ZMMR0025 is removed.
State II
The role Z_TESTROLE has tcode ZMMR0055
now this is tested in development system by the requestor.
Before this goes into PRD via QA a newsflash is sent to all the endusers (so that they know which t-code to use)
Meanwhile if another security administrator works (suppose adds a new tcode or changes an authorization) on this while the role is in state II changes made by Admin 1 are transported along with the second change.
State II + new changes = State III
When the role reaches PRD in state III result is the end user losses access to the required functionality ZMMR0025 before ZMMR0055 is made available.
I hope Im clear , please let me know if I need to be more specific on any part.
I appreciate your help.
regards,
Salman.

Problem with PresentModalViewController and it is not releasing components

Hi ,
Here is the code that takes the user to next screen.
==============
UINavigationController *navController = [[UINavigationController alloc] initWithRootViewController:elementController];
[[self navigationController]presentModalViewController:navController aimated:YES];
[elementController release];
[navController release];
================
I have two screens
1)First screen
2)second Screen
In First screen i have a button, when i click on this the above code executes.
then it takes control to second screen
Even if i released the nav Controller and ElementController , the elements like iubaritem,navigation items are not releasing
Please help me out

Cloud programs do not use serial numbers... you log in to your PAID Cloud account to download & install & activate... you MAY need to log out of the Cloud and restart your computer and log back in to the Cloud for things to work
Some general information for a Cloud subscription
Log out of your Cloud account... Restart your computer... Log in to your paid Cloud account
-Sign in help http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/account-password-sign-faq.html
-http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/activation-network-issues.html
-http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/trial--1-launch.html

Report to Show PR that are not released by release codes

Hello Experts,
I would like to know if there is any report on SAP 6.0 that shows all the purchase requisitions that are not released which shows the releease code (the person's name who has to release the PR). In me55 only could be found by release code, and it is required, I cannot has a report
I think that there is not, but i would like to confirm it.
Thank you in advance,
Best regards

Hello,
1)Go to ME5A t-code & select DYNAMIC SELECTIONS.
2)Select "Purchase Requisition" section and you can make use of parameters like Release Code, Release Indicator , Release Status etc., to fetch the required results.
Hope this helps you in resolving your matter.
Regards
Mahesh

Crystal Report Viewer Not Releasing Oracle Database Connections

I have a very simple vb.net 3.5 web application that uses the Crystal Report viewer 2008 to open a report. My requirements are as follows:
1. Reports are built by another company and provided to us and used in a web environment
2. All reports contain parameter fields
3. The web application must be generic enough that a report can be added to a list and the user simply selects the report and provides database login information. The Crystal report viewer with handle the request for parameter values and prompt the user for their values.
4. All reports connect to an Oracle 10g server.
The above requirements have been meet and we have an extremely simple web application that runs the reports. It is working very well other than the crystal report viewer is not releasing the database connections. This is bad because the credentials are on a per user basis and that same user must login to a different oracle application simultaneously. They are being denied access because the credentials are already in use. We do not have control nor influence over the policies in use on the Oracle server. Ideally we would like to control the Crystal Report viewer so that it closes connections after use.
The web application code is:
Private Sub viewReports_Init(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Init
If Not IsPostBack Then
ConfigureCrystalReport()
End If
End Sub
Private Sub ConfigureCrystalReport()
'Load the Crystal Report viewer with a report.
Try
Dim reportPath As String = Server.MapPath(Session("reportname"))
crViewer.ReportSource = reportPath
Catch ex As Exception
Response.Write(Server.MapPath(Session("reportname")) & "
" & ex.Message.ToString & "
" & ex.StackTrace.ToString)
End Try
End Sub
Can anyone shed some light on this topic? Thank you

Hello, Timothy;
By default, having the report in session will hold it open for 20 minutes.
If you create the report as a ReportDocument object you can take it out of session and release it more efficiently. That will release the connection.
    Private Sub ConfigureCrystalReports()
        If (Session("hierarchicalGroupingReport") Is Nothing) Then
            hierarchicalGroupingReport = New ReportDocument()
            hierarchicalGroupingReport.Load(Server.MapPath("Hierarchical Grouping.rpt"))
            Session("hierarchicalGroupingReport") = hierarchicalGroupingReport
        Else
            hierarchicalGroupingReport = CType(Session("hierarchicalGroupingReport"), ReportDocument)
        End If
        myCrystalReportViewer.ReportSource = hierarchicalGroupingReport
    End Sub
In the Form Unload of the Viewer:
            'Take the report out of session
            Session("hierarchicalGroupingReport") = Nothing
            Session.Contents.Remove("hierarchicalGroupingReport")
            'Clean up the ReportDocument object
            hierarchicalGroupingReport.Close
            hierarchicalGroupingReport.Dispose()
            hierarchicalGroupingReport = Nothing
            GC.Collect()
Elaine

Sending an email from Lotus Notes release 5.0.4a

I need to write java code for sending an email from Lotus Notes release 5.0.4a.
Initially, I tried using Lotus Domino Toolkit for java, but the current release, "Lotus Domino ToolKit for Java/Corba release 5.0.8" is not compatible with the notes client/server we are using(5.0.4a).
Now, I am trying to use "Lotus Domino Toolkit 2.1" which supports notes version 5.0.3 and higher, but I couldnot find out how to use it to send email.
Is there are other way in which we can connect to Lotus Notes for sending email. I cannot use SMTP as the Lotus Notes administrator is afraid of security issues so there is no possibility that I can connect to Domino server using java mail API by enabling SMTP on the Domino server.
I would be thankful if somebody can help me to do this.

First off - This is very "off topic"
The Domino SMTP server is not hard to lock down. Any Notes Admin worth his/her salt should know how to do it. Try to persuade them to run the SMTP stuff using name and password authentication only, or restrict access to an IP address range. This is all easy stuff.
Otherwise DIIOP/CORBA is one way to go. If your toolkit jar files don't work with the server then try using the ones on the server. Look in %noteshome%\data\domino\java for the ncso.jar file.
This works for me on an AS/400 java VM to WinNT/Linux Domino servers of various versions.
How to create an email using this method is again not difficult. All you really need is a blank database template. You have to create a document with certain fields in it (all documented) and then save it. That's all there is to it.
Word of warning DIIOP is not very rapid and careless coding can create problems. Ensure that once you have finished a session you make sure you close it else you will have continual connection problems.
Try searching around the domino/notes groups on how to actually do this.
SH

Transport not Release in QA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for