Transport of changes in 3KEI

Hi All,
I made changes to 3KEI table, When i generate transport system is showing up objects in the request. System allows me to change directly in Quality & Development. But how can i transport new changes to Production? Is there any way or program to transport to production.
Its urgent please help.
Thanks

If you have captured the changed made in transaction 3KEI, release the transport request to QA, Check  and if happy , move to production.
It does not matter, whether the QA is directly changeable or not. But, in order ensure the QA is test was good, ensure, that the QA is not changed while you are testing. Then move to PRD.

Similar Messages

  • How to transport Parameter changes in a crystal report

    Hi All,
    Very Good morning!!!
    I have designed a crystal report with static parameters. Earlier i used to have a dropdown kind of input selection for my parameters.
    Now i got a new requirement for a direct input in the field....tht means no dropdown ...single date field is to be entered directly.
    Accordingly i have removed the dropdown and changed to a single direct date field. I saved these changes to a request and transported to quality. Not sure whether the parameter changes are collected into a request.
    Whereas i couldn't found any changes of my parameters in quality. They are as same dropdown manner in the quality whereas i need them to be a direct field date entry which did not affected the quality server after transporting the changes.
    Could some one please let me know how to reflect these changes in quality server regarding parameter changes in a crystal report for BW.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Jitendra

    Please re-post if this is still an issue or purchase a case and have a dedicated support
    engineer work with your directly

  • Transport and Change Management

    Hello,
    We need to modify our MDM structure (add fields and tables). We would like to avoid unloading the repository. Can we do that in our test environment and move to Production only the structure while keeping the data in Prod.
    What is the Transport and Change Management patch? Is this what we need?
    Thanks for your help!

    Hello,
    This is not possible, as there is no support for Transport and Change management. You will always need some down-time in production. But there are some strategies to reduce the down-time.
    (1) You could use the Java ADMIN API to create a batch-script that performs the required repository modifications. Once you validate it works, unload your repository, run your program and load the repository again.
    (2) Create a "slave" repository and re-direct your production users to that repository. Unload your production repository and make all changes. Once done, reload that repository and switch back. Remember that this will only help to keep a "look-up" only version of the production repository...
    Regards
    Dirk

  • Transporting Workflow changes to QA

    Hi Experts,
    I have some Qs regarding transporting the changes made to the Workflow.
    My Question is that, a custom workflow has lot of requests associated with it ..( both customizing and workbench ).
    Once my workflow has been transported to QA. Now i have to make sm changes to the send mail step.
    I have made the change and linked it to a transportable workbench request.
    Now releasing this request alone will move the change . Or i have to goto basic data and Active the Strt condition again and transport that too, so that the change works fine in QA ?
    Hope my Qs is clear.
    Regards,
    Radhika.

    I have made the change and linked it to a transportable workbench request.
    Now releasing this request alone will move the change
    Yes, there is no need of transporting again the linkage request.Only the changes are reflected to the other system when ever you try to export a request to other system.
    And make sure each time you do a change and when the request is ported to the other system then run the TXn SWU_OBUF and refresh the organizational assignment . this makes the workflow environment to run smoothly.

  • STMS_QA - allow transport of change requests

    Hi,
    we have configured the quality assurance tool (TMS). Now the users must - allow - the transport of change requests into the productive SAP-system via
    transaction STMS_QA.
    If we transport objects via "transport of copies" (from another SAP-system) the QA doesnt work. The users can avoid the QA-System.
    Does anyone know how I could define the transport routes to avoid this situation?
    Thanks
    Michael

    put the Objects in this ( from another system )<b> "transport of copies"</b> request and give the TARGET System name .
    It is simple process , if u are doing first time  do it carefully .
    after doing the process check the TARGET system.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • Returncode of Transporting a change request

    Dear developers,
    do you know how to check the returncode when transporting a change request to test or productive system.
    In my case I have the special problem that change requests will be transported in an async way so that the developer could not check in the SAP solution manager whether the transport is error free or canceled with an error.
    Is there a way to switch the transport management in the solution manager to a synchronous mode?
    Best regards,
    Jens

    Hi Ganesh,
    Can I ask something about inactive object here?
    I applied notes with SNOTE.  But all objects are inactive.
    When I activete them, The system requires accesskey.
    How could this happen? And any solution for this?
    I can't deapply the notes any more. coz it's bug fix for SNOTE.
    If I do this, the system will be inconsistent, this happened beffore
    Thanks
    kaz,

  • Transport Query Changes Individually

    In our environment, we have a SOX IT requirement that each change to a query is separately approved by the business user before it is moved to production.  The transport request must be able to be directly linked to a change request management system where the approvals took place.
    We have a large team.  We use the BEx transport, and have set up several development classes to further refine the changes to queries but the problem is as follows:
    If two developers work on separate queries changes at the same time, but both queries are in the same development class, those changes will be mixed (and locked) into the same BEx request.  This makes it difficult to link one change to one request and another change to another request.  If I then require the developers to collect their changes manually to put them in separate requests, they get errors because the objects are already locked in to the default request for that development class.
    What I would like to do is to turn off the automatic recording of BEx changes so that the developers will all be forced to manually collect changes before moving.  Or even better, if they make a change, they would be prompted as per a normal change to an object.
    Has anyone encountered this problem before or have any suggestions as to how to resolve?

    Hi,
    You have to make sure that all the elements of the queries are captured in the transport request. For that, in transport connection, while capturing the query, filter on "ELEM" and include them in transport connection.
    As for authorization, you will not have it except in development. Thatu2019s the reason why you can not change the query in GRA directly. You always have to transport the changes.
    Regards,
    Yogesh

  • Issue with Info Object Transport after changing Data Type

    Hi Experts,
    We have a DSO which is running past 5 years. And recently(3 days back) we added new fields into that DSO. Delta loaded for last three days and new info object (Say XXX) data populated into DSO.
    Now the problem is, We identified that, info object data type is not correct. We used data type NUMC  instead of CHAR.So Character information is missing for that field.
    Example:
    Data from ECC: ABC123
    Data Loaded to DSO: 123 (Missed character ABC)
    So we deleted data from DSO and changed the info object data type in Development system.
    And also I have deleted only last three days delta records from DSO and transported my info object to Production. But its giving error as: Info object contains data in DSO".
    But that info object field is empty in DSO. I have already deleted last three days delta.
    Do I need to Delete all 5 years data from DSO to change the data type of recently added new info object ?
    Please give me your solutions and ideas to solve this issue.
    Thank you,
    Best Regards,
    Santhosh

    Hi Raman,
    Thank you for your answer.
    When I changed the data type of info object in Dev, I deleted the content of DSO. And same thing transported to QA as well. Before importing changed info object, I just deleted the content of DSO from QA. So transport done successfully QA.
    But in Production we have a history of past 5 years. So I cant delete all contents of DSO.
    So just deleted only the delta request's which contains data for that info object(3 days back, we moved that info object(NUMC data type) to production,So last 3 days delta only loaded for that info object). And tried to transport it. But it was failed. I am sure we need to drop all data from DSO, if I am interested to go with same info object.
    I have some comments on your first approach,
    1. If we delete info objects from Dev DSO and transport to Production will give transport failure, Why because, my previous transports errors clearly saying that info object contains data in DSO . So it wont allow to remove that info object from DSO.
    2.We are using same info object technical name in BO Data federator also. So if we change add new info objects again we need to make changes with BO as well. I am thinking this point as my last option if i cant find any other solution.
    Thank you.
    Best Regards.

  • Problem in Transporting the changes in Payslip  after inclusion of new WT

    Dear Experts,
    Here we have added the new wagetypes in Payslip Through Transction code  PE51  in Dev Client.And the changes were saved in a Transport request.After movement to Quality the respective changes are not shown up.Then we checked the  Transport request and is showing only the respective Payslip and is not showing any config part in the TP Request.
    Could you please tell me the way of inclusion of Changes in the Transport Reqest.
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vikram.

    Dear Sikindar,
    Thanks for the reply.Already we have added the wagetypes in the Payslip of DEV Server.
    What should i do now.Shall i delete the WT  in the Form from DEV and save them ina new request  and adding  of the same Wt in the same new  Transport request .
    After modifications ..What should i do now(After clicking the Red Van Button)
    Please addvice.
    V Sai

  • Transport layer change ?

    Is there any function module or class methods to chnge the tansport layer of a package. I need to change the transport layer from a program.
    Best Regards,
    Sreeram

    >
    Sreeram Manoharan wrote:
    > Hello Florian ,
    >
    > I know to change it from SE80. I have mentioned that  i need to change from a program.Read the question properly.
    >
    > Best regards,
    > sreeram
    Yes Florian,
    read properly! You should have known he already knows how to do it through SE80. Anyone who reads this knows it, so why don't you? We all even know why he needs to do it through a program and not through SE80.
    Please hug me!

  • Impact of the Transport Layer changes in the package

    Dear Experts,
    We are in the process of the Upgrade. As a part of the upgrade from 3.1to BI7. We have two Dev systems one is with the 3.1 - BWD   and the other one is with the BI7- CBD now. We have transported all the objects with the Package : ZBWD (Where the transport Layer of this Package ZBWD).
    And we have introduced the new Integration system(CBQ) in the landscape now and we have changed the Package ZBWD properties(We have changed the Transport Layer of this Package from ZBWD to ZCBD).
    Can anyone please tell me the consequencies of this change in the package. We are planning to move this changed package, once the upgrade is finished.
    Can any one tell me the consequencies of this change and also if we dont transport this package change in the other systems, then what wil be the consequences.?
    Thanks
    Raman
    Edited by: Raman R on Aug 12, 2008 5:42 PM

    Hi,
    We have the package exists in the production which is with the earlier Transport layer called ZBWD.
    As we have the new development system now, we need to change the Transport layer in that same package: to ZCBD.
    Can anyone tell me will there be any impact of this change on the objects in the further landscapes? and also please explain me what are all the steps which needs to be carriedout if the transport layer got changed in the package?
    Thanks
    Raman.....

  • Transport of changes to quereis and CKFs & RKFs

    Hi Gurus,
    I have a Multicube and a  number of queries that has been transported to HIQ already.  I have made a significant changes to these queries in HID, i.e. chges to CKFs, RKFs, including description changes as well as deleting some KFs, and additional KFs.
    I have tried to transport to HIQ by collecting these specific queries and all below and putting the multicube in a separate transport with only necessary objects.
    I transported the Cube first and then all 25 queries in one transport.
    My problem is that in HIQ I have RKFs & CKFs and Queries that I have deleted or renamed in HID.  How do I get both enviroments back in sync ?
    Thanks for your help.
    Laura

    Hi,
    1) Do I need a separate transport for each query ?
    No you can capture multiple queries in one transport
    2) Do I include the Multiprovider in one of these transports ? and/or the Cubes in the MultiCube ?
    No, there is no need to include multiprovider or cube.
    -Mayuri

  • How to transport the changes of lsmw "Read display Program" changes to prod

    Hi,
    i have made some changes in the SAP generated program /1CADMC/SAP_LSMW_READ_<>.
    i.e., in step : Read display program
    the issue is that i made changes...but the changes are stored in $tmp.
    now how to move these changes to Production.
    when i assign to any package it is showing an error saying
    "/1CADMC/SAP_LSMW_READ_<>cannot be assign to package.move to package starting with "/1CADMC/".
    Thanks.
    Kumar.

    HI,
    LSMW cannot be transported from one client to another.
    You will have to do IMPORT EXPORT.
    Run transaction LSMW:-
    Give the Project, Subproject and Object.
    From Menu go to Extras->Export Project.
    Specify the project name
    By default everything in the project will be selected.
    If you want to transfer only a single subobject of the whole project then first deselect everything.
    Deselection can be done by clicking on the description besides then project name.
    After that just select the individual object.
    Then press the export button.
    It will prompt you to save the lsmw in your local machine.
    Save it.
    Similarly Import it to the production system.
    Please note that your changes in the read program will not be copied via import export.
    You will again have to make it in the production system.
    Changing the read program is not advisable as the changes will be lost if someone once again regenerates the progrsm.
    Regards,
    Ankur Parab

  • Error during transport-Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC)

    Hi,
    I am trying to transport from DEV to Test when I encountered this error.
    The tables are both consistent when I checked with SE14.
    Start of the after-import method RS_CUBE_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) CUBE (Activation Mode)
    Error/warning in dict. activator, detailed log    > Detail
    Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC/DZCRUSDI026)
    Table /BIC/DZCRUSDI026 could not be activated
    Return code..............: 8
    Following tables must be converted
    DDIC Object TABL /BIC/DZCRUSDI026 has not been activated
    Error when activating InfoCube ZCRUSDI02
    Error/warning in dict. activator, detailed log    > Detail
    Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC/DZCRUSDI023)
    Structure change at field level (convert table /BIC/FZCRUSDI02)
    Table /BIC/DZCRUSDI023 could not be activated
    Table /BIC/FZCRUSDI02 could not be activated
    Return code..............: 8
    Following tables must be converted
    DDIC Object TABL /BIC/DZCRUSDI023 has not been activated
    Error when resetting InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 to the active version
    How do I resolve this
    thanks

    Hi,
    There are no Inactive objects in the cube in DEV system. Also must of the changes I made in Test are already in the cube in TEST But the cube is not active.
    SAP proposed that the cube be activated manually but is not a good procedure to activate in TEST system.
    Error when resetting InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 to the active version
    Message no. RSO410
    Diagnosis
    Errors arose when activating InfoCube ZCRUSDI02. An active version already existed before the activation.
    System Response
    InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 could not be reset to the old active version. Since the generated objects no longer correspond to the old active version, they were reset to inactive.
    Procedure
    The old active version of InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 can no longer be used. Remove the cause of the activation error and activate InfoCube ZCRUSDI02 anew.
    thanks

  • Transport of changed query

    Hello All,
    I created an Infoset adn Query in development system and transported the same to the Quality system using the 'EXPORT' and 'IMPORT' with REPLACE option. I made some changes like deleting some fields from Infoset and addition of new fields in development. When I try to 'EXPORT' it to the Quality system again, its giving me error saying the deleted field is not avilable in Infoset. While it is IMPORTing the Infoset, its checking against the Query and displaying that the field in Query is missing in the Infoset. Can anyone tell me how these changes can be moved to Quality?
    Or should i just include the deleted fields and not use them in the list?

    Hi ,
    As that field is still used in the query in quality sysetm , you will not be able to import the infoset with deleted field.
    If possible please delete both infoset and query from quality system first and then again try to import both from development.
    Please let me know if this solves your problem.
    Regards,
    Priya Bhat

Maybe you are looking for

  • CDG-03516 ERROR: While generating form in Designer 10g

    Hi Gurus, We have recently migrated from 9i to 10g. We are not able to generate few forms and getting the below error message: "CDG-03516 ERROR: Module NSP0070: This module contains or references an object outside of the current workarea" We found th

  • Can I install Snow Leopard on my Macbook with a Windows-formatted Hard Drive?

    Well my macbook's screen broke and I need to wipe the data off my hard drive. I popped my hd out and deleted the partition using my PC. Formatted it with NTFS and proceeded to secure wipe it by using One Pass Zero technique. If i got my macbook scree

  • F110 - Create Payment Proposal using Idoc Inbound

    Hello everyone, I have a requirement to create Payment Proposals (Transaction F110) using an inbound Idoc on my SAP ERP system. I have chosen Idoc PEXR2002 and made my definitions on SAP-PI, it's already sending the Idoc to my SAP system. Now I need

  • LOV with Query Bind Parameters

    Hi, I have a number of LOVs which have Query Bind Parameters. These LOVs display correctly but when I select a row they do not return values back to the fields in the calling page. I get the following message in the OC4J servers: DEBUG (LovItemBean)

  • Response Code Validation

    Hi All, My Scenario is like this. Asynch xi--Synch communication once I get the Response from the traget to xi I need to validate one filed value from respcode. My Question is how to validate the response code in the switch step of the  BPM Regards R