Transport of Chart of Accounts- Company Code segment

Hi everyone,
i´m trying to transport a chart of account from one system to another.
i´ve used the tx OBY9, but while it works fine for the Chart of Account segment it doesn´t transport the Company Code segment.
Does anyone knows if is it posible to do this? What transaction should i use?
Thanks,
Martin

Hi Martin,
try this procedure:
1. Transport the chart of accounts - OBY9 (only chart of accounts segment)
2. Create the file containing the Company Code segment - tx FS15 on the source system (leave Target Company Code empty, erase ticks Update file immediately and Check file only; enter File name) -> you can see the file using tx AL11- Directory Global
3. Transport the file from the source system to the target system (I have asked my base colleague to do it)
4. Receive the file in the target system - tx FS16 (tick Update File Immediately)
Regards
Jan

Similar Messages

Transport of Chart of Account at Company Code Level

Hi,
I see in IMG, we can only transport the whole Chart of Account(COA). Is there any way to transport the COA at the company code level?
Thanks,
CW

Hi,
OBY2 is copy form company code for chart of accounts. What I need is to transport chart of account at company code level from one client to another client.
Rgds,
CW

The appearance of the company code segment of G/L account is based

Hi,
The appearance of the company code segment of G/L account is based on which factors influenced
which one account group or fieldstatuts group/posting key which one is influenced
Mnay thanks
MvNr

Hi
Gl account influenced by Account group
posting key/filed status variant can be influence at the time of document posting
Thanks & Regards
Phaneendra

Data model 0G: No authorization for entity type Account (Company Code) - activity Display

Hello Expert,
I have a problem with authorization in MDG-F.
I want to create Account with Collective processing. After, entered Entity type, Edition and Chart of account, Blocking message "Data model 0G: No authorization for entity type Account (Company Code) - activity Display" is displayed.
But, i checked in PFCG transaction, for this user profil, activity are : create or generate, Change and display. So, for me , it is correct.
Please, check screen shot below :
Blocking message :
and in PFCG transaction
Could you help me to solve this point?
Kind regards,
Heri RAOELISON

Hi Heri,
the system behavior is correct. The account in company code consists of three entity types:
1) COA - Chart of Accounts (Type 3)
2) ACCOUNT - Account (A-Segment, related to ECC table SKA1, Type 1)
3) ACCCCDET - Account in Company Code (B-Segment, releated to ECC table SKB1, Type 1).
3) includes 1) and 2) whereas 2) includes 1). If you grant authorization only for 3) but not for 1) and 2), you cannot do anything.
Best regards
Michael

Functional area and cost of sales accounting (company code 2000) active

Hi There!
I hope someone can help.
In our sandbox system, whenever I try to convert a Purchase requistion into a Purchase Order I get the following error message : "Functional area and cost of sales accounting (company code 2000) active".
Anyone know how I can resolve this issue?
Kind regards,
Karl

Hi,
Double click on the error message & check the message Number..
Then go to
Spro>MM>Pur
Attributes of system messages & change the Message from Error to Warning..
Thx
Raju

What is the function of FS chart of account (T. Code: OC03)

Hi all,
What is the function of FS chart of account (T. Code: OC03)
How to post entries in this FS Chart of account (provide T. Code)
Where we use this FS Chart of accounts
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar

Thanks for youre reply
What is mean by EC CS and how to test whether FS Chart of account working or not?
Provide path or Transaction Code
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar

Text ids for Chart of Accounts & Co Code Area

Hi,
Why do we need obt6 & obt7 i.e. Text ids for Chart of Accounts & Co Code Area.
Regards,
Vikas

in case when u want to use some additional text for the creation of GL at a crertain level like COA then u create the standard text types and tick the relevant text... then whenever u create the GL then it will give u the option of putting text there..... it is more of information text....

Field Bus. Area is a required field for G/L account company code g/l ac

hi ,
I am getting this following error when trying to post a cenvat in the tcode of J1iEX .
"Field Bus. Area is a required field for G/L account <companycode> <cenvat g/l acct.no.> "
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Bus. Area" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "13113920" in company code "LECS" linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Bus. Area". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application used to call up the interface or get in contact with SAP directly.
Plz help me ..
Regards
Deepa

Hi Deepa,
At Easy access screen :
1.Go to the master account of that G/L (F-02).
2.Check the field status variant defined there.
At Customization screen (SPRO):
3.Go to the master account of that field status variant.
4.Change the status of business area field optional.
Nikhil Garg

STOCK TRANSPORT ORDER With in One company code

Dear Laksmipathi,
While RP delivery in stock transfer order With in One company code, the sym will pick movement tyoe 641 and which ic configrued in SL .But in STO there is no sale order creation that i mean SL will pick only in sale order.
Here order type UB and plant combination sym will pick the Delivery type NL
NL -NORM -V sym will pick Item category NLN of Delivery not of sale order.
NLN-NN(Schedule line)
Generally we know the SL which is determined by item category and MRP type , here item category is coming only in RP delivery document.
So my question is
Question 1.how this 641 which has determined while RP Delivery document?
                               if it is determining from schedule line NN , how it can be consider since sale      order is not in the picture?
Question 2. In 641 the cost has been updating /Accounting document is getting generatiing where as in VF01 billing doc not relevent for Accounting doc .so how we can settle or balance the cost of this material while occured in 641 or PGI?
Question 3.What are the business benifits while doing STO?
i am new in this and Pls advice how to give the point to you .
Regards
ISHI

Dear Thakkar,
Pls compare my question and ur answer
Question 1.how this 641 which has determined while RP Delivery document?
if it is determining from schedule line NN , how it can be consider since sale order is not in the picture?
What is   I am not clearu2014that if i641 is determining from schedule line NN , how it can be consider since sale order is not in the picture?
Ur Ans:
A1. In case if STO the item category is assign to Delivery typeitem category groupusages+ Item category of the higher-level item Tocde (ZERO)0VLK Taking the item category and and checking the schdeline assign to the same. In schedule line you will find 641.
Query
OVLK which is delivery header and taking the item category of Delivery through Delivery typeitem category groupusages+ Item category of the higher-leveL.
Can we determine the SL with delivery type and delivery item category since sale order is not in the picture?
How we can take the sale order item category for find SL since sale order is not in the picture?
Question 2. In 641 the cost has been updating /Accounting document is getting generating where as in VF01 billing doc not relevant for Accounting doc .so how we can settle or balance the cost of this material while occured in 641 or PGI?
What is   I am not clear-How settle cost of this material ?
Ur Ans : The accounting is happening for material value.
Are you think Is it correct this answer yourself?
Question 3.What are the business benifits while doing STO?
I am cleared in third answer which you   given   and I am appreciating to you ur response, but the answer should be according to my question.
Thanks
Ishi

Check table 169P connected to chart of acts /company code

Dear friends,
I have configured Act determination.
we have 1000company code and 1000 chart of acts.
when iam doing GR-MIGo,iam getting the meassage like--"Check table 169P: entry 1000 does not exist"
please suggest what to do,
regards,
Canand

hi ,
this error comes while u have not tick the item amount check for company code.
path
spro > MM > log inv verification > invoice block > set item amount check >
here tick in front of company code
that will solve ur prob
regards,
snb

Multiple Financial Accounting Company Codes but only 1 Legal Entity

Hi all,
We are implementing various countries payrolls, which includes posting to general ledger.
We have a situation whereby there are many company codes for financial accounting purpose (local term calls them company code / sector). These separate company codes need to be differentiated in posting documents.
For most countries we are able to have many company codes but 1 legal entity (for e.g 1 tax reference number, and company details for statutory reporting for various company codes). But for Malaysia, this is not allowed.
I understand that commonly that Company Code in SAP should be legal entity. But there are many companies who practises different external financial reporting that have 1 legal entity separated in different sector for GL / financial reporting purpose.
My question is:
1. How can we set multiple company codes, but with 1 legal entity details (e.g. Tax Reference Number, Legal Entity Company Name and Address for Statutory reporting) for Malaysia?
2. If this is not possibe, how can we split up the GL file (or at least have different separation in the same file to show the different company codes)? It does't seem that Personnel Area or Personnel Area is picked up by PC00_M99_CIPE (payroll posting). Where can we store this besides Business Area field for individual employees (as this field is already used to distinguish another internal GL reporting, e.g. for Indirect / Direct Employee).
Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Vicky

Hi,
A client can either be valid for a company code at the smallest level, or the entire
corporate group.
The company code is defined in financial accounting. The balance
sheet and profit and loss statements are drawn up at the company code level.
The personnel area, which is only used in Personnel Administration, is unique in each
client. You must assign each personnel area to a company code.
You also use the personnel subarea only in Personnel Administration and it is the smallest element of
the enterprise structure. You link the groupings that define the entries to be used for
employees of a particular company code/personnel area to the personnel subarea.
I understand your question ,
question 1 is belong to FICO quesion , as a HR counsultant you have only way:
one way set your multiple company as HR personnel area level ,then make those personnel area belong to the company that with 1 legal entity details ,
another way is set your multiple company as a company have company code at SAP , then posting to each company ,then let FICO department to adjust subsequent account.
hope can help you
Olivia Yang

Extend chart of account to company code

Hi Experts,
I have created a chart of account. I want to extend all accounts to particular company code, as mare assignment of chart of account to comapny code (OBY6) does not allow to use these accounts for this particular company code.
Please guide me how can i do that.
Best Regards

I think you can't just extend accounts from CoA to a company code. Because CoA and Company code sections of a GL account is always different. And there are certain fields at Co code levels like Field Staus Group which is a required entry and this doen't exist in the CoA segment at all, then how can you extend CoA to a Co Code directly?
Standard practice is to
-create a chart of accounts by copying a SAP standard CoA (e.g CAUS for US) t-code OBY7
- Extend this CoA to a specific company code by copying from a SAP sample Company Code (E.g. Co Code 0001 which uses the CoA CAUS) t-code- OBY2
- Do mass update for the Chart of accounts to have the description and other changes (T-code OB_GLACC11)
-Do mass update for the Chart of accounts (Company Code data) if required (T-code OB_GLACC12)
- Then copy the GL accounts from one Company code to Mutiple company codes (FS15)
Since you have already created the CoA accounts, you can possibly create all GL accounts manually in a specific company code (T-code FSS0) and then copy to other Company codes (T-code FS15)
Or You can use LSMW to create the GL accounts in one company code and then copy to other Company codes (T-code FS15)
Thanks
Ron

Chart of Accounts Upload

Hi ,
I am working on upload of Chart of Accounts. Here I have to upload the Group Chart of Accounts and then the Operational Chart of Accounts( company code level ). Can you please suggest a detailed right approach to do it ?
I am currently using the standard batch input program RFBISA00 through LSMW approach for the purpose. It is loading the operational chart of accounts ( company code level ) fine. But how to upload the Group Chart of Accounts through this same program ? Although the fields to be loaded in Group Chart of Accounts ( tcode - FSPO ) are also part of the field list to be loaded in Operational Chart of Accounts ( Tcode - FS01 ) . Is there any problem through this approach ?
Points Guaranteed for helpful resolutions.

hi ,
in fspo wat fields u r trying to populate. i had a requirement where i wasw populating the GBR(legacr a/c for sap g/l account) account note field using fspo transaction.
i used create_text function module.
this is for all th g/l accounts for a single company code.

How to maintain the chart of accounts with the GL account number

Hi to the entire group,
can some let me know the process to maintain the chart of account with the GL account number.i am facing a problem when executing the interface in the batch job - it displays the message -- G/L account 2160371820 is not defined in chart of accounts XXXX.
The GL account exists in the FS00 (both at chart of accounts & company code level) but when we use the report S_ALR_87012326, the GL account does not appear in the report.
Kindly help me out.
Advance Regards
Harini

HI
Ex: In the chart of accounts u define account group Current asset from no.200200
      to 200299
Know im creating Inventor account and Bank account
i will goto fs00 GL account no .200200 HDFC Bank account
              FS00 GL account no 200205 account group Current assets
               GL description Inventory A/C
Regards
Sure

Transport chart of account

Hi,
Is it possible to transport the chart of account (both segment: chart of account segment and company segment) to QAS and Production system. How can I proceed?
Thanks,
Cecilia

Hi Cecilia,
Transport of Chart of Accounts use T.Code:OBY9
If you want to transport Company Code Ac's Create a Transport Request and include the table SKB1.
~Andrew
Edited by: Andrew J on Feb 16, 2011 11:22 AM
Create a Customizing Transport Request and include only your company code Accounts with *(ALL).

Transport of Chart of Accounts- Company Code segment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for