Transport Planning Level

How to transport just planning level? should not include its planning functions or planning group

Hi,
I have tried both option
1) via BPS0 - Tools - transport same as UPC_TRANSPORT_BPS
2) via UPC_TRANSPORT_BPS_ALL
In both the option, the system is collecting all the child object of the planning level.

Similar Messages

COPA-KE3I, Tranasport for Planning Level

Dear All,
When i am using Transaction Code KE3I to create a transport Request for transporting Planning Levels, i am being prompted with a Work Bench Request and a Customizing request. Can you please explain the significance of the Work Becnh Request here(since in the T Code SE09 i find all the Planning Levels i intended to transport under Customising Request and the Work Bench Request seems to be empty).Should both these requests be transported ? Can you also guide me in the sequence of releasing them.
Best Regards
COTINYFEET

Dear Ajay ,
It seems i have no other option but to use KE3I in my Project. Now if i am using KE3I, and i have got two Reuests a) Workbench Request( this does not contain any Data when i see using SE09) b) Customizing Request(all the Planning Levels that are intended to be transported are there in this , used SE09 to view here).
These are my Questions
1) Should i Release both the Request. If so what is the sequence?
2) What are the consequences if i dont release Workbench Request(since it contains no objects to be transported) and release only Customizng Request?
3) Why should there be a Workbench Request Created here(KE3I), when i dont get it in KEPM(here only Customizing Request Is Created when i transport Planning Levels)
Could you please shed some light into my queries.
Best Regards
COTINYFEET

Objects transported when we transport a Planning level in BW-BPS

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me what are the objects that will get transported when we transport a Planning Level under a Planning Area in bw-bps.
Thanks in Advance
Asif

Hi
I am facing a problem that whenever I transport BPS objects everything comes in ,but the formula written in Excel Sheet doesnot gets transported .
I have tried doing 2-3 times but problem still exists ...can someone help me
Regards
Tom

Transportation plan date calculated in VA01

Hi Expert,
The business wants to deliver all goods existing on a sales order togheter even if we have different good issue dates per schedule lines, probably caused by the fact both sales order lines have different routes. Therefore the material, loading and transportation plan dates will also be different for each schedule line. I understand the system will split this sales order into more than one delivery, because the route is taking into account in the delivery split functionality. This is OK. On the other hand, I would like the system to show in VL10H all sales order lines form that sales order. This is possible to be done if the transportation plan dates from each confimed schedule line are the same, because VL10H takes into account the transportation plan date to show the sales order to be delivered. My question is, would it be possible to align the transportation plan date in both schedules lines via customizing or should I have to put on an EXIT? I have already tried via "Define Scheduling by sales order type", but not succesfull.
Thanks Marcelo.
See example below:
Line 10
Req. Del. Date: 19.03.2008
GI date: 05.03.2008
Loading date: 05.03.2008
Mat.AV.date: 05.03.2008
Transp.plan.date: 03.03.2008
Route: TNLN10
Line 20
Req. Del. Date: 19.03.2008
GI date: 04.03.2008
Loading date: 04.03.2008
Mat.AV.date:04.03.2008
Transp.plan.date: 03.03.2008
Route: TNLN11

Hi Marcelo,
In most general scenario, to have complete delivery we use ship complete flag at header level. This will deliver units together for all line items. There is also one ship complete flag at item level in sales A/B screen. I have also been researching on this and i think this also can be used to ship complete some items of sales orders and not all items.
But you want to have transp planning date same but diff routes, then doing through standard SAP is difficult. This will involve major changes to availability checks. I think wiser and easier option is to touch user exit at save document level. This will help to trigger this check at VA01/02 level.
Also please do consider the rescheduling runs effect when such changes are designed.
If this has helped some way to go closer to answer, please do reward me points.
Kind Regards
Sandeep

Cash Management Report FF7B - drill-down from planning levels to AP/AR OIs

Hi
I'm configuring cash management and have created all planning levels and groups needed.
All master data, ie GL accounts, vendors and customers, have the correct planning level or group.
I've created all the groupings etc that I need.
I'm running the reports FF7A and FF7B. I have two questions and problems.
1. When running the Liquidity Forecsat for customers and vendors I drill-down to the standard PL or SL planning levels for AP and AR postings respectively. Then I drill into the planning groups correctly (E1-E9 and R1-R8). But when I try to drill into the cash management detail records (or is it the AP/AR line items?) I get "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data". This happens every time. Should I now see the AP or AP line items? Or should I see some cash management memo records? I have deleted all the cash management data several times and recreated but I still get this problem (using reports RFFDDL00 and RFFDKU00)
When I do the same for purchase orders, purchase requisitions or sales orders I see a Memo Records List which agrees with the previous planning level total and I can then drill into the actiual POs, PRs or SOs from this list without an issue.
2. When running the Cash Position and I do the drill-down to the GL Line Items, I get an enormous list which does not just show the total of items at the previous planning level. Why is this please? Example: a bank account with a balance of £2,000 (shown on the panning level) but with 000's of line items totalling say £5m. Again I have deleted the CM data and recreated but without any improvement to the problem.
Any help anyone can give me with these issues will be very much appreciated.
Thanks.
Wayne

Hi
I have the same trouble with Tcode FF7B. There´s a message "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data"; bit in the TcodeFF7A, it runs OK. The message appears just witn Tcode FF7A.
Also, There´s all TR data in tables FDSB for GL accounts, FDSR and FDFIEP for customers/vendors.
Can you help me?? can you solved this issue?
Tanks for your Help

Delivery 0080000276 is not relevant for transportation planning.

At the time of (delivery related) invoice creation, system throws a message "check the error log".
Log says:
" Error Log             0080000276 000010 Delivery 0080000276 is not relevant for transportation planning
            LongText
                Detail
                 Diagnosis
                     Copying control for billing requires that shipment costs
                     are copied from the shipment belonging to this delivery.
                     No shipment costs could be determined, because this
                     delivery is not relevant for transportation planning.
                 System Response
                     The system assumes that no shipment costs are to be billed
                     in this case.
            Technical data
                Tech. data details
                 Client                                 251
                 Group Number
                 Sales Document Number                  0080000276
                 Item Number of the SD Document         000010
                 Schedule Line Number                   0306
                 Counter in Control Tables              00
                 Message Identification                 VY
                 System Message Number                  306
                 Output Type                            I
                 Message Variable 01                    0080000276
                 Message Variable 02
                 Message Variable 03
                 Message Variable 04
                 Group Type                             F "
Please advice if anyone have any idea for this error log.

Error Log 0080000276 000010 Delivery 0080000276 is
not relevant for transportation planning
It is not necessary to assign the Transportation Planning to Delivery type. Only recently, I completed a similar configuration and running successfully for a client. The issue is because of your copy control VTFL. For more information, check note 713171.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Creation of new planning level in BPS0 in BW 3.5

Dear Experts,
I have to create a new planning layout in BW 3.5 BPS
for this ,I have followed the below procedure:
-Maintained the master data of new keyfigures in Info Object: Key Figure (0MEASURE) in RSA1
-Copied the Similar Planning level in the same Planning area (in which I need to add the new one) and created a new planning level with its subordinate objects and then changed by deleting the keyfigures except # and added the new keyfigures, to be maintained in new planning area and saved.
-Changed the planning layout (which is created automatiacally whne we copied planning level) by deleting the existing key figures except 0KEYFG_FLAG and added the required key figure and saved.
-copied the planning profile and created a new planning profile and changed it with required planning level and package and saved.
-In T-code:upx_mntn1, I could see the new planning level with the required key figure there.
But this new planning profile is not appraring in the CRM server.
As I haven't worked in BPS , please guide me if there is any thing needs to be done or any changes in the procedure followed.
Please share any documentation or links you have ....regarding this
Please share your Ideas
Thanks in advance....
Arjun

Hi,
The Planning Profile has been created in CRM also and hence the configuration is working

What is the significance of having a compound master data in the planning levels?

In "SAP2" model there is PERPRODCUST as a planning level.
This planning level has PERIOD, PRODUCT, CUSTOMER and PRODUCT-CUSTOMER master data as part of the planning level.
Wouldn't PERIOD, PRODUCT, CUSTOMER be sufficient? Why is the compound master data required to be added to this planning level.
Could someone clarify this for me.
Thank you.

I'll attempt:
It depends on if you want to surface the result/value of the compound master data type on the key figures in your planning level. If you do then you'll need to include it in the planning level.
If the question is why would I want a compound master data type, then my attempt at that answer is as follows:
From my understanding, the idea of a compound key figure is that you are able to derive an attribute or attributes that are related to, in this case, two master data types - all without having to 'store' that attribute on the transactional record.
Here is a simplistic example:
Master data on PRODUCT (where PRODID is the key)
PRODID,PRODDESCR,PRODSIZE
P1,Widget A,Big
P2,Widget B,Big
P3,Widget C,Small
P4,Widget D,Small
Master data on CUSTOMER (where CUSTID is the key)
CUSTID,CUSTDESCR,CUSTREGION
C1,Store A,West
C2,Store B,West
C3,Store C,East
C4,Store D,East
Master data on compound MDT PRODUCT-CUSTOMER (where PRODID and CUSTID are the key)
PRODID,CUSTID,SALESREGION
P1,C1,BIG_WEST
P1,C2,BIG_WEST
P1,C3,BIG_EAST
P1,C4,BIG_EAST
P2,C1,BIG_WEST
P2,C2,BIG_WEST
P2,C3,BIG_EAST
P2,C4,BIG_EAST
P3,C1,SMALL_WEST
P3,C2,SMALL_WEST
P3,C3,SMALL_EAST
P3,C4,SMALL_EAST
P4,C1,SMALL_WEST
P4,C2,SMALL_WEST
P4,C3,SMALL_EAST
P4,C4,SMALL_EAST
Finally you have some transactional data for the Key Figure on the planning level (ex: Sales)
PRODID,CUSTID,SALES
P1,C1,10
P3,C4,15
P4,C3,30
P1,C3,20
P2,C2,15
*Note that you don't need to 'store' the sales region attribute on the record
Then on your report, you can pick the SALESREGION and get your aggregated values:
SALESREGION,SALES
BIG_WEST,25
BIG_EAST,20
SMALL_WEST,0
SMALL_EAST,45

Setting # for 0CALYEAR in selection for planning level in BPS

hi all!
when i try to set # for 0CALYEAR (and other time variables) in selection for planning level in BPS, i recieve the following error message: 'Value # is not permitted for characteristic Calendar Year' (UPC003). As i understand, this problem began to occur after upgrading to SPS12.
we have BI 7.0 installed
can anyone help me solve this problem please?


Hi 
Check in year master data if value BLANK (#) exists. System should permit only those values for characteristics which are available in master data tables. 
Secondly, does system allow you to select value # for calendar year using the F4 drilldown?
 
Hope it helps. 
Cheers Abhijit
Please assign Reward Points if I above information was useful

How to make authorization to different planning level on one planning area?

now the situation is one planning area call one global company, under that we create several planning level for serveral sub-company. The authorization should that one sub-comp. only can display, change his planning level, and can not display any other sub-comp. So, in this case how to make authorization? Thanks!

I didn't create an authorization variable on sub-comp. pls, let me know how to create an authorization variable on sub-comp, and the info for the next steps. thanks!

Variable in the planning level

Hi,
One variable X is assigned to Y characterstic in the Selection tab of planning level.
I want see the properties of X variable, i want to see the defination part of X varaible.
where can i find the x variable?
It would be great help for me.
will assign the points.
thanks
BPS

Hi Maynak,
Thanks for ur quick reply.
I assigned the points.
So my question is : if i want the see vairable properties do i need to change the planning area to change mode?
Is it any other way without changeing the planning area to change mode to find out the variable dfination part.
Please help me in regards.
thanks
BPS

Affect of a new planning level selection

Hi,
we have a BW-BPS environment with lots of BPS functionalities, palnning sequenses, save, copy functions...
Until now we have all products from SAP R/3 extracted.
Newly there are now in SAP R/3 lots of small products. Planning people donu2019t want to see and plan all products in planning layouts. They want to see to plan only the "important products".
The following solution is thought.
we will create a product hierachie with 2 hierarchie node: "important products" and "small products".
the hier. node u201Cimportant productsu201D should be used in all planning levels in selections.
How can it (selection in planning level) affect the current planning functions ?
What would you suggest here?

Hi,
Planning functions are assigned to just one planning level. So if you have planned to restrict the values using Hierarchy at planning level, then the underlying functions will apply only to that hierarchy members.
regards,
Lokesh Nandula

BPS: how to restore modified standard planning level into orignal content l

Hi Expert,
Can you plz explain how to restore modified standard planning level into orignal content level.
Thanks
Ajay Kumar

Hi,
Please check the link. It miht help..
[Unable to View Standard Planning Functions]
Thanks
Pratyush

Bps-planning level

hi friends,
i am creating planning level by default i am getting ad-hoc package .
what is this.
Thanking u
suneel.

Ad hoc package is generated for you to use; usually we ignore them, and use our own with our naming standards for the same of authorization and other purposes.
Ravi Thothadri

Planning Level/Package names not displaying correctly in BPS0 (BI7)

We have just upgraded our BW system from 3.5 to BI7. We are running SEM 3.5.
We now seem to have a display issue with the titles of some planning levels and packages within BPS0.
On some planning level/package lines the display in the left hand pane of BPS0 is truncated with only a partial description, even though the full description is displayed in the right hand pane. This is not consistent, as other levels and packages are displayed correctly. It is not truncating at the same place in all instances.
I have tried to delete the description and re-input it again, but the problem persists.
Similar display issues occur in UPSPL in a seemingly random fashion.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Many thanks
Barry

Hi
Have just found out what is happening and the solution....but no nearer to knowing why.
The display problem occurs in descriptions of planning levels and packages in BPS0 and in UPSPL & UPSPM. Also when viewing global planning sequences.
The cause is the use of "&" in a description text. When this character is removed and replaced with another, eg "+", then the descriptions display correctly.
I wonder if this is to do with "&" being a special character, which I believe XML doesn't handle too well?
Anyway, I can now change the descriptive text and the problem goes away.
Barry

Transport Planning Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for