Transport rule with custom dsn

Hi
Our environment: Exchange Server 2013 CU6 - DAG
I created a custom dsn: New-systemMessage -dsnCode 5.7.15 -Internal $False -Language en -Text "Custom text"
Then I created a transport rule which reject mails to a test user with enhanced status code 5.7.15.
The Mail is rejected with the status code 5.7.15, but without the custom message. I configured it on Exchange 2010 and it worked. In the meantime we made a transition to Exchange 2013. I don't know how long it doesn't work, I just figured it out because
I had to configure another one and that one doesn't work as well.
Even if I configure a new transport rule which rejects mails to a test user with "Reject the message with the explanation", and as explanation I put in "Sorry" the mail gets rejected with status code 5.7.1 but no text,
Any suggestions?
Regards
Peter

Hi Amy
Thanks for answering.
I know the link, that was the first reference I contacted.
The dsn message is configured correctly, because it worked. By the way, the parameter -DSNCode doesn't exist with Get-SystemMessage, but only Get-SystemMessage lists all my the custom system messages.
I tried exactly the same in my lab with Exchange 2013 CU6 but no DAG, and I have the same issue.
I created the system message:
New-SystemMessage -DsnCode 5.7.15 -Language en -Text "This is a test." -Internal $true
I created a Transport rule to reject messages to a specified mailbox with enhanced Status code 5.7.15. About 20 minutes later I sent an email to this mailbox and the mail is rejected with the status code 5.7.15, but the text I created with this System message
is missing:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
[email protected] ([email protected])
Delivery not authorized, message refused
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating Server: srvex01.company.com
[email protected]
Remote Server returned '550 5.7.15 TRANSPORT.RULES.RejectMessage; the message was rejected by organization policy'
What am I doing wrong? I did it exactly according to the TechNet article, and I have the same problem on two different Exchange organizations.
Regards
Peter

Similar Messages

Add firewall rule with custom environment variable in program path

Hi,
We want to create a firewall rule for a program which is placed in folder which changes sometimes. I know you can add a firewall with the ProgramFiles environment variable like this:
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Test Firewall rule" dir=in program="%%ProgramFiles%%\Test\Test.exe" action=allow security=notrequired
The environment variable ProgramFiles isn't expanded and if the Program Files folder is different on a system the rule still works.
We try to use this with a custom environment variable which we set a system environment variable with this command:
SETX SomeFolder "D:\Some Folder\Apr 2015" /M
If we use the command below to add the firewall rule in a batch file the environment variable SomeFolder is expanded correctly and the program path is added as a static path.
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Some Firewall Rule" dir=in program="%SomeFolder%\AFile.exe" action=allow security=notrequired
Because the folder changes sometimes we want to change the environment variable SomeFolder and not remove the old firewall rule and create a new one. We want to add the environment variable SomeFolder to the program path as a (dynamic) environment variable
and not as the expanded path at the moment when the rule is added. If we use this command:
netsh advfirewall firewall add rule name="Some Firewall Rule" dir=in program="%%SomeFolder%%\AFile.exe" action=allow security=notrequired
We get the error:
          Windows Firewall with Advanced Security
          An error occurred while adding the rule.
          Error: The parameter is incorrect
          Status: The application name could not be resolved
          OK
Why can't we use %%SOMEFOLDER%% like we can use %%PROGRAMFILES%%? The same error is shown when we try to add the firewall rule through the management console 'Windows Firewall with Advanced Security'
W. Spu

Hi,
Based on my plenty of test with this problem, it seems like there is no better method to achieve your requirement. To add new policy to firewall, it would be better using general cmdlet. The path parameter like %%SomeFolder%% do have problem in add firewall
policy cmdlet.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Setting a Transport Rule to reply with a Custom DSN for a Disabled User and disconnected mailbox

Here is what I am trying to accomplish. A user leaves the company. We disable there exchange email and that in turn disabled the account in AD. We want a custom NDR to say "This employee is no longer and employee blah blah" We dont get rid of email
boxes but we disable them.
Here is what I done. Created custom NDR and then created a transport rule to read if the message is sent to [email protected] reply back with this NDR code. It works fine if I disable the user from AD and not exchange. Once I "disconnect" the mailbox
it no longer works. I get the default NDR that says this email cant be found. I don't want that one. I want my custom NDR. I don't want to modify the 5.1.1 message either. Is there away around this?

Hi Nellyjo,
In your case, when you disable the user from AD and Exchange, in fact the message is blocked before reaching transport rule, recipient filtering is blocking this email. If you still want to achieve your goal by transport rule, you need to create a mailbox
or contact to make your transport rule work.
What's more, you also can modify original DSN for external and internal senders to meet your requirement.
For more information, here is a similar thread for your reference.
Setting a Transport Rule to reply with a Custom DSN for a Disabled User
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/b1a4dd86-1e0e-43a9-b340-a80352e5c323/setting-a-transport-rule-to-reply-with-a-custom-dsn-for-a-disabled-user?forum=exchange2010
Hope it helps.
If you need further assistance, please feel free to let me know.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Custom DSN message nor custom rejection message is appearing when Transport Rule Blocks incoming e-mail.

Good Afternoon,
      My Customer is running Exchange 2013 CU5 that has a transport rule that is supposed to reject any email from a particular user as that user is no longer with the company. The transport rule rejects the message, BUT, it does
not show the Custom DSN. It shows the default message:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
[email protected] Your message wasn't delivered because the recipient's email provider rejected it.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: EXMBX01.DOMAIN.LOCAL
[email protected] Remote Server returned '< #5.7.169 smtp;550 5.7.169 TRANSPORT.RULES.RejectMessage; the message was rejected by organization policy>'
I have looked up the transport rule in Exchange:
Get-TransportRule "User Reject" | fl *Reject*,Description
RejectMessageEnhancedStatusCode   : 5.7.169
RejectMessageReasonText           : This E-MAIL Address is no longer in service. Please Contact
                                    [email protected] for assistance
SmtpRejectMessageRejectText       :
SmtpRejectMessageRejectStatusCode :
Description                                  : If the message:
Is sent to '[email protected]'
and Is received from 'Outside the organization'
Take the following actions:
Set audit severity level to 'High'
and reject the message and include the explanation 'This E-MAIL
Address is no longer in service. Please Contact
[email protected] for assistance' with the status code: '5.7.169'
I tried setting up to separate external DSN messages and tried both with the same results:
Get-SystemMessage | ft -a -wr
Identity            Text
en\External\5.7.69 This E-MAIL Address is no longer in service. Please Contact [email protected] for assistance.
en\External\5.7.169 This E-MAIL Address is no longer in service. Please Contact [email protected] for assistance.
I tried to change the SmtpRejectMessageRejectText on both Exchange servers and got the following error:
Set-TransportRule -Identity "User Reject" -SMTPRejectMessageRejectText "This E-MAIL Addre
ss is no longer in service. Please Contact [email protected] for assistance"
A specified parameter isn't valid on a server with the Hub Transport role installed.
    + CategoryInfo          : InvalidArgument: (SmtpRejectMessageRejectText:String) [Set-TransportRule], ArgumentExcep
   tion
    + FullyQualifiedErrorId : [Server=EXMBX01,RequestId=b2a61aba-179b-4867-85b8-cc47eba62701,TimeStamp=6/27/2014
    7:19:32 PM] [FailureCategory=Cmdlet-ArgumentException] 8BBE1900,Microsoft.Exchange.MessagingPolicies.Rules.Tasks.
SetTransportRule
    + PSComputerName        : exmbx01.domain.local
I really am having issues finding and answer. Any assistance would be greatful!
Thanks,
Lance Lingerfelt

Hi Lance,
Thanks for your update.
According to the error that you pasted, "A specified parameter isn't valid on a server with the Hub Transport role installed.", it seems you have no proper permission to use some specific parameters.
Even if there are many parameters in the Technet article
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125138(v=exchg.150).aspx , you may not have access to some parameters if they're not included in the permissions assigned to you. You need Organization Management and Records Management permissions, see
the following links:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd633492(v=exchg.150).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd335087(v=exchg.150).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd638205(v=exchg.150).aspx
Thanks
Mavis
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Mail transport rule to block email with recipients in 2 different domains

Is it possible to set up a mail transport rule (Exchange 2007) to block or put on hold emails that are sent to recipients in more than one domain?
Eg if the recipients /cc/bcc are
[email protected];[email protected]
then the email is held for approval before sending
Can this be limited to only process from certain sending addresses?
If it can't be done in 2007 can it be done in a later version or can it be done in a non microsoft product eg Postfix
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Hi,
From your description, you want to prohibit retired users from sending emails to
[email protected] If I have misunderstood your concern, please let me know.
In your case, these retired users are hosted on Exchange Online, this is Exchange 2013 forum. I would like to tell you how to achieve it on Exchange 2013.
I recommend you verify it on Office 365 forum. For your convenience:
https://community.office365.com/en-us/f/158.aspx
What's more, I would like to clarify the following thing:
If you prohibit A from sending email to B, B send an email to A and C, when A reply all this email, C still can receive this email, only A can't receive it.
Hope my clarification is helpful.
Best regards,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Specific Action for Custom DSN

I have a user with mailbox that is no longer with the company.
I know how to create a custom DSN message and apply it to a transport rule.
I see that you can apply actions to a transport rule that will "Copy" a received message to another user.
I see that you can apply actions to a transport rule that will "Reject" a message and apply a custom DSN.
What I am UNABLE to do is the following:
Receive the message, copy it to another user, and then send a custom DSN to the sender with further instructions.
It would appear that Exchange 2010 will not allow you to perform both "Actions" because the action that applies a custom DSN must "Reject" the message in order to apply the DSN.
Am I missing something here? Surely I'm not the only one with a need of this type?

Hi,
I'm afraid you can't allow both two actions:"Copy" and "Reject".
When you reject the message,the message will been deleted,cannot been copy to another user again.
There will a error remind when you use EMC to create transport rule :
Hope this helps!
Thanks.
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 HTML Signature via Transport Rule

We had a request to create a custom signature for our organization. I have this working via a transport rule in Exchange 2010. It works great for messages coming from a client such as Outlook or OWA.. but when a message originates from an Iphone or Android Device it does not work.
Is it possible to make the iPhone send its email as HTML by default? Or has anyone ran into this and found a solution.
Thanks

I can't find a clean answer for you.
You might use the Set-TransportRule cmdlet and one of the exception clauses to look for something in the header. I looked at an ActiveSync-generated header from my Droid (I don't have an iPhone to try this out on) and I see this:
Message-ID: [email protected]
The clause:
-ExceptIfHeaderMatchesPatterns "Message-ID:\s(\S|\s)*email.android.com"
should exclude messages sent from Droids. Of course, I can't say that it'll exclude all of them so you'll have to experiment and use trial and error.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb123534(v=exchg.150).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997187(v=exchg.141).aspx
You may need to experiment with the rule because I haven't tested it.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Where to check/enable for log keeping track of transport rule actions?

I have implemented some transport rules to "journal" all emails from specific clients as per this
thread.
So there are 4 transport rules to capture all those email:
1. email from Clients (incoming / FROM)
1.1 from users outside the organization.
1.2 sent to member of AD Group
1.3 sent to users inside the organization.
1.4 where the from address contains "domain of our clients list"
1.5 BBC to capture mailbox
2. email to Clients (outgoing/ TO)
2.1 from member of AD Group
2.2 from users inside the org
2.3 sent to users outside the organization.
2.4 where the to address contains "domain of our clients list"
2.5 BBC to capture mailbox
3. email to Clients (outgoing/ CC)
3.1 from member of AD Group
3.2 from users inside the org
3.3 sent to users outside the organization.
3.4 where the cc address contains "domain of our clients list"
3.5 BBC to capture mailbox
4. email to Clients (outgoing/ BCC)
4.1 from member of AD Group
4.2 from users inside the org
4.3 sent to users outside the organization.
4.4 where the bcc address contains "domain of our clients list"
4.5 BBC to capture mailbox
The symptoms are that while I am seeing by selecting random emails that everything seem to run fine (rule filtering from transport does get incoming and outgoing messages to that “capture” mailbox) and I tested this fine with some test emails
in different domains.
Somehow I am no getting the results I want. With business sending some test sets I should be finding in that mailbox, I do not find everything. Some of the email that apparently would logically be captured are not. Is business lying about the test sets they
send? I don’t think so and the fact is that I seem to be missing emails.
Anyhow my questions to you are the following:
1. Do you know of any logging done by the transport server to check on matches of the filters?
2. I am using outside and inside condition in the rules. Are they what I think they are?
I hope you can help. I think I am doing this right, but I cannot verify the process 100%. Some logs or additional information would help. Or perhaps I am not using the conditions properly.
Thank you in advance.
and BTW the environment is Exchange 2007

Based on my research, there is no specific log to match the filters. During the mail flow, only SMTP log and Message Tracking log can record the message information.
You can check the two logs if needed. For more information, please refer to the following steps.
Enable Message tracking log
1. Open the Exchange Management Console.
2. In the console tree, expand Server Configuration, and select Hub Transport.
3. In the action pane, click the Properties link that is directly under the server name.
4. In the Properties page, click the Log Settings tab.
5. In the Message tracking log section, Select Enable message tracking log to enable message tracking.
6. Click Apply to save changes and remain in the Properties page, or click OK to save changes and exit the Properties page.
Enable SMTP Log
1. In the console tree, expand Organization Configuration, and select Hub Transport.
2. In the action pane, click on Sender Connectors and right click on send connector and then click on properties.
3. Select “Verbose” under “Protocol logging level” and then click ok.
Then, you can find the logs from the following location.
Collect Message Tracking Log
On the Exchange server, go to directory “c:\program files\Microsoft\exchange server\TransportRoles\Logs\Message Tracking”
Collect SMTP log
Open the folder on the Hub Server,: C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\TransportRoles\Logs\ProtocolLog\SmtpSend.
Thanks.
Novak
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Error provisioning a resource with custom approval process

Hi,
While trying to provision a resource with custom approval process, I get the following error:
<May 11, 2012 8:07:18 AM IST> <Warning> <oracle.wsm.agent.handler.wls.WLSPropertyUtils> <BEA-000000> <WLSPropertyUtils:getOperationName(),operation name is null>
<May 11, 2012 8:07:18 AM IST> <Warning> <org.eclipse.persistence.session.oim> <BEA-000000> <
Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.0.2.v20100323-r6872): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "DEV_OIM"."REQUEST_APPROVALS"."APPROVAL_STATUS" (actual: 442, maximum: 32)
Error Code: 12899
Call: UPDATE REQUEST_APPROVALS SET APPROVAL_STATUS = ? WHERE (REQUEST_APPROVALS_KEY = ?)
bind => [com.oracle.bpel.client.BPELFault: faultName: {{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/}selectionFailure}
parts: {{
summary=<summary>XPath query string returns zero node.
The assign activity of the to node query is returning zero node.
Either the to node data or the xpath query in the to node was invalid.
According to BPEL4WS spec 1.1 section 14.3, verify the to node value at line number 251 in the BPEL source.
</summary>}
, 6]
Query: UpdateObjectQuery(oracle.iam.request.vo.ApprovalData@11e00d4b)
at org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException.sqlException(DatabaseException.java:324)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeDirectNoSelect(DatabaseAccessor.java:801)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeNoSelect(DatabaseAccessor.java:867)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.basicExecuteCall(DatabaseAccessor.java:587)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeCall(DatabaseAccessor.java:530)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeCall(AbstractSession.java:914)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:206)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:192)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.updateObject(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:715)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.StatementQueryMechanism.updateObject(StatementQueryMechanism.java:430)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatabaseQueryMechanism.updateObjectForWriteWithChangeSet(DatabaseQueryMechanism.java:1141)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.UpdateObjectQuery.executeCommitWithChangeSet(UpdateObjectQuery.java:84)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatabaseQueryMechanism.executeWriteWithChangeSet(DatabaseQueryMechanism.java:287)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.WriteObjectQuery.executeDatabaseQuery(WriteObjectQuery.java:58)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.DatabaseQuery.execute(DatabaseQuery.java:675)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.DatabaseQuery.executeInUnitOfWork(DatabaseQuery.java:589)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.ObjectLevelModifyQuery.executeInUnitOfWorkObjectLevelModifyQuery(ObjectLevelModifyQuery.java:109)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.ObjectLevelModifyQuery.executeInUnitOfWork(ObjectLevelModifyQuery.java:86)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.internalExecuteQuery(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:2898)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1225)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1207)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1167)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.CommitManager.commitChangedObjectsForClassWithChangeSet(CommitManager.java:233)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.CommitManager.commitAllObjectsWithChangeSet(CommitManager.java:108)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.writeAllObjectsWithChangeSet(AbstractSession.java:3260)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.commitToDatabase(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:1413)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.commitToDatabaseWithChangeSet(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:1518)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.writeChanges(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:5499)
at oracle.iam.request.repository.ApprovalRepository.updateApprovalInstanceWithOutcome(ApprovalRepository.java:84)
at oracle.iam.request.impl.ApprovalManager.approvalInstanceComplete(ApprovalManager.java:111)
at oracle.iam.request.impl.ApprovalPolicyServiceImpl.updateApprovalResult(ApprovalPolicyServiceImpl.java:52)
at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyServiceEJB.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.visit(MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.java:37)
at weblogic.ejb.container.injection.EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.callback(EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.java:54)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.EnvironmentInterceptor.invoke(EnvironmentInterceptor.java:50)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
at $Proxy351.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyService_1nib43_ApprovalPolicyServiceRemoteImpl.updateApprovalResultx(ApprovalPolicyService_1nib43_ApprovalPolicyServiceRemoteImpl.java:462)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.invoke(RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.java:84)
at $Proxy184.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyServiceDelegate.updateApprovalResult(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(SecurityInvocationHandler.java:68)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.security.Security.runAs(Security.java:41)
at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.weblogicLoginSession.runAs(weblogicLoginSession.java:52)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler.invoke(SecurityInvocationHandler.java:79)
at $Proxy350.updateApprovalResult(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.request.workflowcallback.ApprovalCallBack.completed(ApprovalCallBack.java:28)
at oracle.iam.platform.workflowservice.ws.CallbackServiceImpl.callback(CallbackServiceImpl.java:98)
at oracle.iam.platform.workflowservice.ws.wls.CallbackService.callback(CallbackService.java:33)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSInstanceResolver$WLSInvoker.invoke(WLSInstanceResolver.java:92)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSInstanceResolver$WLSInvoker.invoke(WLSInstanceResolver.java:74)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.InvokerTube$2.invoke(InvokerTube.java:151)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.sei.EndpointMethodHandlerImpl.invoke(EndpointMethodHandlerImpl.java:265)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.sei.SEIInvokerTube.processRequest(SEIInvokerTube.java:100)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube$FlowControlAwareTube.processRequest(FlowControlTube.java:155)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube$1.run(FlowControlTube.java:94)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube$1.run(FlowControlTube.java:92)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:337)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube.processRequest(FlowControlTube.java:91)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:604)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:563)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:548)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:445)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:373)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:524)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:255)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:140)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:208)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:310)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:223)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.JAXWSServlet.doPost(JAXWSServlet.java:124)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.JAXWSServlet.service(JAXWSServlet.java:79)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.security.am.agent.wls.filters.OAMServletAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(OAMServletAuthenticationFilter.java:260)
at oracle.security.am.agent.wls.filters.OAMValidationSystemFilter.doFilter(OAMValidationSystemFilter.java:133)
at oracle.security.wls.oamagent.OAMAgentWrapperFilter.doFilter(OAMAgentWrapperFilter.java:121)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.dms.wls.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:330)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.doIt(WebAppServletContext.java:3684)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3650)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2268)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2174)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1446)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
Caused By: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "DEV_OIM"."REQUEST_APPROVALS"."APPROVAL_STATUS" (actual: 442, maximum: 32)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.SQLStateMapping.newSQLException(SQLStateMapping.java:74)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.newSQLException(DatabaseError.java:135)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:210)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:473)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:423)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:1095)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:205)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForRows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:1040)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1379)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3568)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3694)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.executeUpdate(OraclePreparedStatementWrapper.java:1508)
at weblogic.jdbc.wrapper.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:172)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeDirectNoSelect(DatabaseAccessor.java:792)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeNoSelect(DatabaseAccessor.java:867)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.basicExecuteCall(DatabaseAccessor.java:587)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseAccessor.executeCall(DatabaseAccessor.java:530)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeCall(AbstractSession.java:914)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:206)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:192)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.updateObject(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:715)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.StatementQueryMechanism.updateObject(StatementQueryMechanism.java:430)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatabaseQueryMechanism.updateObjectForWriteWithChangeSet(DatabaseQueryMechanism.java:1141)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.UpdateObjectQuery.executeCommitWithChangeSet(UpdateObjectQuery.java:84)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.queries.DatabaseQueryMechanism.executeWriteWithChangeSet(DatabaseQueryMechanism.java:287)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.WriteObjectQuery.executeDatabaseQuery(WriteObjectQuery.java:58)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.DatabaseQuery.execute(DatabaseQuery.java:675)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.DatabaseQuery.executeInUnitOfWork(DatabaseQuery.java:589)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.ObjectLevelModifyQuery.executeInUnitOfWorkObjectLevelModifyQuery(ObjectLevelModifyQuery.java:109)
at org.eclipse.persistence.queries.ObjectLevelModifyQuery.executeInUnitOfWork(ObjectLevelModifyQuery.java:86)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.internalExecuteQuery(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:2898)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1225)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1207)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1167)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.CommitManager.commitChangedObjectsForClassWithChangeSet(CommitManager.java:233)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.CommitManager.commitAllObjectsWithChangeSet(CommitManager.java:108)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.writeAllObjectsWithChangeSet(AbstractSession.java:3260)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.commitToDatabase(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:1413)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.commitToDatabaseWithChangeSet(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:1518)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.writeChanges(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:5499)
at oracle.iam.request.repository.ApprovalRepository.updateApprovalInstanceWithOutcome(ApprovalRepository.java:84)
at oracle.iam.request.impl.ApprovalManager.approvalInstanceComplete(ApprovalManager.java:111)
at oracle.iam.request.impl.ApprovalPolicyServiceImpl.updateApprovalResult(ApprovalPolicyServiceImpl.java:52)
at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyServiceEJB.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:310)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:182)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:149)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.visit(MethodInvocationVisitorImpl.java:37)
at weblogic.ejb.container.injection.EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.callback(EnvironmentInterceptorCallbackImpl.java:54)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.jee.spi.EnvironmentInterceptor.invoke(EnvironmentInterceptor.java:50)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:89)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.doProceed(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:131)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.support.DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.invoke(DelegatingIntroductionInterceptor.java:119)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:171)
at com.bea.core.repackaged.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
at $Proxy351.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyService_1nib43_ApprovalPolicyServiceRemoteImpl.updateApprovalResultx(ApprovalPolicyService_1nib43_ApprovalPolicyServiceRemoteImpl.java:462)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.invoke(RemoteBusinessIntfProxy.java:84)
at $Proxy184.updateApprovalResultx(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.request.api.ApprovalPolicyServiceDelegate.updateApprovalResult(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(SecurityInvocationHandler.java:68)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.security.Security.runAs(Security.java:41)
at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.weblogicLoginSession.runAs(weblogicLoginSession.java:52)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler.invoke(SecurityInvocationHandler.java:79)
at $Proxy350.updateApprovalResult(Unknown Source)
at oracle.iam.request.workflowcallback.ApprovalCallBack.completed(ApprovalCallBack.java:28)
at oracle.iam.platform.workflowservice.ws.CallbackServiceImpl.callback(CallbackServiceImpl.java:98)
at oracle.iam.platform.workflowservice.ws.wls.CallbackService.callback(CallbackService.java:33)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSInstanceResolver$WLSInvoker.invoke(WLSInstanceResolver.java:92)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSInstanceResolver$WLSInvoker.invoke(WLSInstanceResolver.java:74)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.InvokerTube$2.invoke(InvokerTube.java:151)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.sei.EndpointMethodHandlerImpl.invoke(EndpointMethodHandlerImpl.java:265)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.sei.SEIInvokerTube.processRequest(SEIInvokerTube.java:100)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube$FlowControlAwareTube.processRequest(FlowControlTube.java:155)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube$1.run(FlowControlTube.java:94)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube$1.run(FlowControlTube.java:92)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs(Subject.java:337)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.tubeline.FlowControlTube.processRequest(FlowControlTube.java:91)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:604)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:563)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:548)
at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:445)
at com.sun.xml.ws.server.WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:373)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:524)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:255)
at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:140)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:208)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:310)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:223)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.JAXWSServlet.doPost(JAXWSServlet.java:124)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.JAXWSServlet.service(JAXWSServlet.java:79)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:26)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.security.am.agent.wls.filters.OAMServletAuthenticationFilter.doFilter(OAMServletAuthenticationFilter.java:260)
at oracle.security.am.agent.wls.filters.OAMValidationSystemFilter.doFilter(OAMValidationSystemFilter.java:133)
at oracle.security.wls.oamagent.OAMAgentWrapperFilter.doFilter(OAMAgentWrapperFilter.java:121)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at oracle.dms.wls.DMSServletFilter.doFilter(DMSServletFilter.java:330)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:56)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.doIt(WebAppServletContext.java:3684)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3650)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2268)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2174)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1446)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
>
<May 11, 2012 8:07:18 AM IST> <Error> <oracle.iam.request.impl> <IAM-2050200> <Failed to create the request in the repository.>
<May 11, 2012 8:07:18 AM IST> <Error> <oracle.iam.request.impl> <IAM-2050050> <Exception thrown Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse Persistence Services - 2.0.2.v20100323-r6872): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException
Internal Exception: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "DEV_OIM"."REQUEST_APPROVALS"."APPROVAL_STATUS" (actual: 442, maximum: 32)
Error Code: 12899
Call: UPDATE REQUEST_APPROVALS SET APPROVAL_STATUS = ? WHERE (REQUEST_APPROVALS_KEY = ?)
bind => [com.oracle.bpel.client.BPELFault: faultName: {{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/03/business-process/}selectionFailure}
parts: {{
summary=<summary>XPath query string returns zero node.
The assign activity of the to node query is returning zero node.
Either the to node data or the xpath query in the to node was invalid.
According to BPEL4WS spec 1.1 section 14.3, verify the to node value at line number 251 in the BPEL source.
</summary>}
, 6]
Any idea how to resolve this ??
Thanks,

Based on the error trace
Caused By: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-12899: value too large for column "DEV_OIM"."REQUEST_APPROVALS"."APPROVAL_STATUS" (actual: 442, maximum: 32)
you are inserting a value too large for REQUEST_APPROVALS.APPROVAL_STATUS column. It should contain values like COMPLETED, approved, rejected etc... Check your custom approval process again.
Regards
user12841694

I hate to say - DISATISFIED WITH with CUSTOMER CARE RESPONSE and VERIZON in all for first time.

I am currently on National 900 plan on Motorola Droid. I switched from AT&T primarily because I love to use data on mobile. Verizon provided me the unlimited plan. I was a very happy customer with Verizon untill now.
Scenario -
Today, I called up Verizon customer care executive to see why bill for the month was not readjusted. Can anyone believe it its staggering $1137.73 [Roaming charges 1019.19].
Since this January, I am visiting to Canada. On first visit in January, I called up customer care to see what options I do have to use my phone in Canada as I use it in US. Verizon had a wonderful plan - just the monthly data plan is escalated appear. 30-40$ extra than the normal appear. 29.99$ plan. I happily added that plan before visiting Canada. While there is Canada, I did get notification couple of time that I am exceeding data limit but again checked with customer care later - they readjusted the bill as that was 'FALSE ALERT' as I was on unlimited data plan while roaming as well in Canada since I paid the additional prorated of (30-40$) for period of my stay there.
This equation worked for first and second visit - Unlimited Data while I used to get FALSE ALERT.
On my third visit , things changed - Verizon stopped providing the unlimited data services. I called up as usual before this visit. Customer care executive said - you are set to go to Canada now. I was not very specifically told on call that the rules have changed now and there is limit to data usage while roaming. During this visit also, I got the alerts - I assumed this was also a FALSE ALERT like prior one.
But this time, it was not FALSE ALERT, now I charged with this fee. I raised my concern and called up customer care appear. 10 day before [today is March 6th], they assured me that it is going to be re-adjusted ONLY for this time. And, they also asked to check account after 48 hours and if not readjusted please call. But, I checked my account today and it was not readjusted. So, I called up customer care executive for half an hour -- not willing to listen to any logic of mine and he said politely 'SIR, WE CANNOT READJUST YOUR BILL' . I am still trying to figure out where is my fault when I was not told DATA PLAN HAS CHANGED FROM THIS VISIT.
I hope senior management will look into this matter and re-adjust current bill. It's due this March 10th. I would appreciate any positive response prior to this so that I can pay the bill and BE A HAPPY VERIZON CUSTOMER.
Sincerely,
Manoj K. [removed personal information]

I called them back yesterday night, not willing to listen my story. Sir we sent you SMS notifications. But these notifications, I also got when I had unlimited plans on first and second visit. Then customer care told SIR you don't need to worry - but this time I should have been very specifically told rules are changed before changing my plans which I wasn't. I was under impression that I am on same unlimited plans.
A job not well done in COMMUNICATING TO CUSTOMERS and using that an opportunity to OVERCHARGE $1100 - INSANE for one month bill. None of my fault. SMS notification is no communication as earlier SMS noitification were false positive and bills were adjusted as I was on unlimited data plan.
Now you change the rules and send SMS Notification; RULE CHANGE, one is not aware of.. ANY NORMAL person will treat SMS notification as FALSE ALERT.. isn't it??

Block incoming calendar / meeting requests to a specific mailbox / user using transport rules or an Outlook rule?

I have a weird request I have never thought I would get. I have a VIP user that wants to receive no calendar invites / meeting invites from:
- anyone outside of our organization (ie: from the internet)
- only certain users from INSIDE our organization
Can I accomplish this either though a transport rule and/or an Outlook rule? I am on Exchange 2007 currently, and Outlook 2007 currently. Soon to have both on 2013 versions, migrating soon, but if possible, I need to implement this in our current environment.
Thanks in advance

Hello,
Based on your description, I understand that the VIP user don't want to receive meeting requests from anyone outside of your organization and certain users from inside your organization. If so, we can't create transport rule in exchange 2007.
I recommend you upgrade your exchange server 2007 to exchange 2013. If you use exchange 2013, you can create this transport rule like : under condition, the sender is this person (distribution
group, you can add certain users from inside your organization to a distribution group) ; the recipient is this person (the VIP user);
the message properties include the message type(Calendaring); under actions, block the message reject the message and include an explanation/ reject the message with the enhanced status code of /delete the message without notifying anyone.
You need to create the second transport rule: you only need to change the first condition: the sender is located outside the organization, and other conditions and actions are the same as the first transport rule.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Cara Chen
TechNet Community Support

Transport rule doesn't work (trying to prepend a subject when mail comes to a second domain).

This is an SBS2011 and accepts mail for two mail domains (successfully), but I am trying to phase out one of the two domains.
I cannot find a better way to do it, but I have simply created this rule:
priority 0
when a recipient's address contains '@<olddomain>.gr'
prepend message subject with '[GR!] '
It doesn't do anything.
It's not a matter of restarting services or waiting for some kind of replication. This rule is created (and is enabled yes) more than a month.
Any ideas?
EDIT: In Message Tracker, I find a test message has the following entry just after receiving from remote mail server:
"The e-mail address for recipient "<myself>@<olddomain>.gr" was updated to the e-mail address "<myself>@M<newdomain>.com". The message is in the process of being delivered.
...then I have the successful delivery, without transport rule kicking in.
So is the problem related to the recipient having BOTH email addresses set? Then why system replaces the old with the default? Probably this is why the rule doesn't kick (as it doesn't match any more).
Is there a way to prevent this replacement, since I want the recipients to still get reached by the mail?
NLS

Hi NLS,
I would like to verify if you apply the rule for your primary email address.
You can try to use the following cmdlet to achieve your goal.
New-TransportRule -Name 'New Rule' -Comments 'Comment' -HeaderContainsMessageHeader 'Received' -HeaderContainsWords 'olddomain.com'-FromAddressContainsWords
'[email protected]' -PrependSubject "OLDDOMAIN"
Hope it helps.
If you need further assistance, please feel free to let me know.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

How to configure TMS for ChaRM with Customizing routes?

Hi Experts,
We have succesfully configured three system landscape TMS for ChaRM for several pipelines already. Now we are facing a situation where TMS is as follows:
DEV to QAS contains routes:
Customizing: ZEBP => 100
Transport: ZDEV => 100
Customizing: ZSUS => 200
Transport: SAP => 100
The question with these is how to add ZEBP and ZSUS to ChaRM configuration?
QAS to PRD:
Delivery: 200 => 200
Delivery: 100 => 100
Here the question is how to enable transports between 200s alongside 100?
When looking at SMSY in SolMan, SUS is a logical system only.
Has anyone of you come across a situation like this? I'm glad for any hints you may give me!
Our SolMan is 4.0 SP13.
Best Regards,
Auli

Hi
in my opinion you can configure it the following way:
Customizing: ZEBP => 100
Transport: ZEBP => 100 (not ZDEV)
Customizing: ZSUS => 200
Transport: SAP => 100
Then assign ZEBP as default transport layer for client 100 and ZSUS for client 200.
It is not possible to configure ZEBP and ZDEV for client 100 if you want to use charm
regards, Andy

HELP - Exchange Server 2007 Transport Rule Issue

Hi all,
sorry if here is not the place to put my question but I did not find another forum, so if anyone can help me I appreciate.
- I have an Exchange Server 2007 SP3 environment with 1 MBX Server and 3 CAS/HUB Servers.
- I have created a Transport Rule that said:
"all emails that have @test.com in BCC field are dropped off except one group can send" .
The issue is the rule doesn´t work.
Anyone can help me, please?
Thanks in advance.
Luiz

The Exchange previous versions forums are here:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/exchangeserverlegacy
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Transport Rule does not appear to be working

hi,
I have an exchange 2013 environment. i have a requirement to intercept inbound emails from external senders addressed to [email protected] and forward it to a single recipient.
we have an internal distribution list already using [email protected] that has 30 members.
I have setup the following rule
apply this rule if: the recipient is [email protected] and the sender is:outside of the organization
Do the following:redirect the message to [email protected]
Priority 0
Audit : not specified
mode: enforce
when i send a test email from externally all 30 people still recieve the mail. i have tried restarting the transport service. Can anyone please help me as i am struggling to see what might be wrong.
thanks
Paul

Hi paul ,
From your description i came to understand that the E-mails from the external senders addressed to the distribution group [email protected] should have to be redirected to [email protected]
As per my knowledge ,There are two ways to achieve your scenario one is via transport rule and another one is via DL restriction .
via transport rule
1.If you wanted to check whether the transport rule is applied to that message or not you should have to do the message tracking first .
2.Then you have to enable the pipeline tracing log for the particular recipient in our exchange organisation . With the help of that logs you can able to identify what are all the transport rules has applied to the messages received by the that recipient
Note: Pipeline tracing is only for troubleshooting purpose , once you have completed your troubleshooting please turn it off .
Via DL restriction :
On that particular DL If you go to the option delivery management you can able to set the restrictions .
only senders inside my organization - This is the option where you can restrict who can able send an email to this DL and it would be some of the internal recipients or all the internal recipients .
Senders inside and outside of my organization - This is the option where you can restrict who can able send an email to this DL and it would be some of the internal recipients or all the internal recipients or some of the external recipients
or all the external recipients .
you should have to create a contact in case if you wanted to provide mail sending permission to this DL only for some external recipients
Please reply me if you have any queries .
Regards
S.Nithyanandham
Thanks S.Nithyanandham

Transport rule with custom dsn

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for