Transport strategy of BI-BO Objects

How to transport the BI-BO objects across the landscapes? I mean WEBI, DEKI, XCELCIUS, Crystal and all other BO reports
created on BI Queries/Infoproviders.
Can we have BO reports saved along with our regular BEX Queries in BEX folders?
Can we publish BO reports in BI portal?
Plz help in understanding the transport strategy of BI-BO objects!!

If you're using XIR2 you have only one option - Import Wizard tool. If you are on Xi3.1 you have 2 options Import Wizard or LCM (Life Cycle Manager).
Documentation for both available at http://help.sap.com/businessobjects.
Can we have BO reports saved along with our regular BEX Queries in BEX folders?
No
Can we publish BO reports in BI portal?
Yes, if you're using CR reports.

Similar Messages

SAP Query Use and Transport Strategy

Anyone wish to share their experience in the use of SAP Query? We generally have an understanding that we don't want to be giving out this tool to end-users in Production. We would like to create queries, and when we wish to give them out we'll attach t-codes to them and roll them out.
However in practice, this is becoming difficult. An example is where in our gold client we create queries and then we would typically transport to our unit test client. But whenever we do an export, it generates a transport request. Before we are done testing we may end up with 10's of transports for a single query?
Anyone have some ideas on a transport strategy for SAP Query? How about it's use in Production? Our landscape for changes are typically DEV Gold -> DEV Test -> QAS -> PRD. We would ideally like our transport strategy for queries to match what we do for everything else.

HI,
Query objects are transported in different ways according to the query area in which they were created.
In order to know which transport options are available, you must first understand how query objects are created.
Standard Area
Query objects are stored in the client-specific table AQLDB. They are not connected to the Change and Transport Organizer.
Global Area
Query objects are stored in the cross-client table AQGDB. They are connected to the Change and Transport Organizer.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d2/cb467f455611d189710000e8322d00/content.htm
Global area objects can be transported into other systems. Standard area query objects can not only be transported to other clients within their own system, but into all clients of other systems as well. In addition, query objects can be transported from the global query area to the standard query area and back within the same system.Transports are normally performed by the system administrator, not by end-users. For this reason, you need the appropriate authorizations
Check the below links for detailed explanation
Transporting Global Area Objects
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/ec/052786a30411d1950a0000e82de14a/content.htm
Transporting Standard Area Objects
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/ec/052789a30411d1950a0000e82de14a/content.htm
General Transport Description
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d2/cb4699455611d189710000e8322d00/content.htm
Generating Transporting Datasets
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d2/cb46a6455611d189710000e8322d00/content.htm
Reading Transport Datasets
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d2/cb46e7455611d189710000e8322d00/content.htm
Managing Transport Datasets
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/d2/cb46f4455611d189710000e8322d00/content.htm
Transporting Objects between Query Areas
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/ec/05278ca30411d1950a0000e82de14a/content.htm
I hope this solves your purpose.
Regards,
Vara
Message was edited by:
varaprasad bhagavatula

ChaRM: usage of ChaRM and none-Charm transport strategy

Hi ChaRM-TMS Gurus!
We have the following [SAP system landscape |http://www.file-upload.net/view-1086963/SDN_TMS_Ist_Soll.jpg.html] and would like to use ChaRM approach simultaneously.
What are the minimal requirements concerning transport layers/routes, which settings should be changed?
How much and which transport layer/routes does ChaRM need?
a) 1 any new transport layer/route
b) standard transport layer, transport layer "SAP" and others
Should all the standard transport layer/routes from virtual systems to real QAS and PRD systems or can I start as follows:
1) Leave the current TMS settings unchanged
2) Activate the extended transport control
Result: the current setting will be client specific and all the old transport requests will be moved to client specific transport routes
3) change the transport strategy (from mass transport to single transport)
3) Define new transport layer
4) Define new transport route for SAP objects from DEV to QAS
and assign the transport layer from 3) (client specific)
5) Define new transport route ZXXX from DEV to QAS
and assign the transport layer from 3) (client specific)
6) Define the delivery transport route from QAS to PRD (client specific)
7) activate and distribute the settings
Thank you very much indeed!
Thom

Hi Martin,
Solmaniacs' assumptions are correct. You can have as many source clients as you want.
As long as
- STMS configuration (transport routes, and domain links) are consistent
- SMSY configuration (logical components are declared properly with assigning the right role types to systems/clients)
- Project declaration are done correctly (so that from Solman solar_project_admin you can read the STMS as confiured in the distant STMS domain)
- IMPORTANT: those configuration GO ALONG with each other !! (SMSY should nt contradict STMS for example...)
The tasklist that is generated for each Solman project will be as follow
- Node 1: Header Tasks (commun to all systems)
- Node x: Corresponding to track x declared in Project (each Source System will have his own node with the corresponding track under)
- Node x+1
- Node ...
- Last Node : Tasks for Tasklist closure - checks on scma consistancy and CTS projects closure
So you'll always have n+2 nodes in your tasklist; n beeing the number of declared source (=dev) systems in project
For each action launched from change docuemnts like creation of TR, release of TR or Retrofit (as Solmaniac said) you'll have an additional pop-up that will appears letting you choose the system you want to use for the action
Hope its helpful
Regards
Khalil

SAP-XI Transport Strategy

Hello
Can anyone please point me to SAP-XI transport strategy document. e.g what would you transport, what tool would you use etc.
Thanks.

Hi,
We have two options
-- one is File transfer method through which we can export the objects into a file and that can be imported in another.
here we can export individual obeject and SWCv wise,namespace wise also.
-- Another one is CMS
through this option tracks are to be defined from DEV-QA-PROD
see the below links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f85ff411-0d01-0010-0096-ba14e5db6306
Also...
How to configuring the CMS for XI?
Please see the below links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b8d8f7b2-0701-0010-b09a-cda4cca2c98e
Where can I get installation files of DTR, CBS, and CMS?
https://websmp201.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01200252310000071155&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202 -> How to Guide on
'How ToTransport XI Content Using CMS'.
/people/sap.india5/blog/2005/11/28/xi-software-logistics-solution-iii-cms
Regards
Chilla
reward points if it is helpful..

Consider Dynamic pegging in Strategy parameters for dependent objects

Dear All,
I have specified "Consider Dynamic pegging within the propagation range" in the DS strategy profile for strategy parameters of Dependent objects"
However still when i Do a drag and drop functionality on the detailed scheduling board, system allows me to schedule the operations as and when required without the respecting the pegging.
As per the documentation on help.sap.com , I expect system to move the dependent objects ( dymanically pegged receipts ) as soon as the requirement element is moved on the dashboard so that the dynamic pegging relationship is maintained.
However system is not doing so - it allows me to move the parent requirement anywhere and breaks the dymanic pegging with the dependent receipt.
Has anyone worked with such a scenario earlier.
Thanks for the help!!
Thanks
Ameet

Hi Tiago,
Thanks for your reply. However I have maintained the said settings in the strategy profile. Also I am not getting any scheduling error for the system to break the pegging relations. Instead I am getting the message "Rescheduling Successful" but with broken pegged relations.
My requirement is that the end time of one order should always exactly correspond to the start time of the subsequent order.
I planned to achieve it by making "Maximum Earliness of the Receipt" as 00:01 in the product master - Pegging tab.
Hence I expected the system to preserve the dynamic pegging between 2 pegged orders as and when any of the two orders is moved on the Detail scheduling board. This seemed to be possible theoretically based on the documentation on help.sap.com. However it is not working as expected - may be I am missing something.
Please let me know if there is any other better way to achieve this functionality.
Thanks
Ameet

Transport strategy for your transport landscape is inconsistent

Hello everybody,
we had 4 system landscape.
DEV>QAS>TST-->PRD.
we move the request from DDEV >QAS>TST and then forward request from TST to PRD system.
Now, we have delete the system TST from TMS, after deletion it give the warning.
Transport strategy for your transport landscape is inconsistent.
Message No. XT481
Please suggest, what is meaning of this warning and how to correct.
Thanks
Ganesh

You need to do following
1. Logon to domain controller client 000 -->STMS --> Overview System --> Select TST --> SAP System --> Delete
2. Reconfigure STMS DEV>QAS>PRD
3.STMS --> Overview Transport Routes --> Configuration --> Distribute and Activate (To All System)
Note : You should do this from Domain Controller client 000
I assumed you know Step 2. If you dont please let me know i can guide you on that as well
Cheers !
Manish

Transport strategy for BOE landscape

I am looking for a transport strategy for BOE landscape from security viewpoint. Basically we want to transport crystal reports, webi reports and folders along with security principles (BW roles/users included). Can anybody provide more info on this?
Regards,
Prasad

Yeah...we have LCM (XI 3.1 onwards) and Import Wizard for BOE tranports. But if we use BW roles as principles, transporting reports/folders with Security doesn't give desired results.
For example, if I am transporting a webi report with principle DEV001@RoleA from Dev to QA/PRD, I would get a new group in QA with name DEV001@RoleA instead of QAS001@RoleA. *I am looking for a pointer change here from DEV001 to QAS~001*. I think we have this feature of changing system pointers for Connections/Universes/Crystal Reports in LCM.
I know we need to move crystal reports and publish them again in QAS/PRD but this way we need to assign security for folders. I want to avoid these efforts by doing one time configuration in DEV and moving it to QAS/PRD through LCM. This is more consistent with current SAP Netweaver transport strategy.
Regards,
Prasad

Mass transport strategy but satellite system is configured for ChaRM

We want that all transports are automatically transported in the development test client.
We have calling a job with program TMS_BCI_START_SERVICE in the satellite system. But this program can only be used for mass transports and does not work when single transports strategy is activated.
Question:
Is there no solution to transport all this transports automatically in development test client via mass transport strategy if satellite system is configured for ChaRM scenario?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards Urs

Hello Michele,
Please, check the point 5 in the link below:
/people/dolores.correa/blog/2009/07/22/change-request-management-scenario-usual-questions-and-known-errors
I think that this information can help you.
Best Regards,
Diego Fischer

Re: Workflow controlled Transport Strategy

Hi friends,
we are using workflow controlled transport strategy in our landscape. So far we are using existing help help.sap.com to configure the same. But we found that it is not enough for completing configuration in perspective of out client requirement. Can anybody help to get the more help on this?
Any help would be highly appreciated.
thanks,
krishna

SAP Note : 313991
Due to the approval of a request in the QAS system, this becomes
active in the import queue of system VDE (status: Request is ready
for import). Refused requests receive the following status:
Request was refused.
o The RSTMS_DIST_APPROVED_REQUESTS program is used to transfer the
requests with the status "Request is ready for import" from the VDE
import queue to the supply system of VDE (that is, the PRD
production system or, if necessary, several production systems and
clients) and then to delete them from the import queue of VDE.
Refused requests (status: Request was refused) are also deleted
from the VDE queue.
You can choose between the following options:
- Transfer all approved requests:
All approved requests from the VDE queue which are before the
end are transfermark (stop mark) red. All requests that have
not yet been processed with the QA procedure remain in the VDE
queue until a decision (approval or refusal) has been made.
cheers
dEE

Transport strategy for BPC

Hi all,
Is there a transport strategy for BPC. How do we move changes made in the development to the testing to the production environment? How do we transport the changes? Is it done manually or does BPC have a feature that automatically transport the changes? Does BPC keep automatically track of the changes?
Thanks.

I think this OP's message was posted in the wrong forum. In any case, there's a whitepaper on the transports for BPC 7.0NW.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b048ecf4-9414-2c10-ceac-fb2492a8016c
Hope this helps.
-Ken

Compare Transport & find missing code or object

Hi Experts,
I have one query in transport release.
How we can compare the objects released from one system to other.
I have systems say X & Y. I had moved one transport TR1 from system X to system Y.
The transport X contains lot of objects.
Now I had imported the TR1 in system Y. In system Y if I check the LOG for Transport TR1 then I will see some 'Generation of program' 'import' are ended with errors.
Could you please suggest me how I can find that whatever code or things are missing in system Y as compared to system X.
Regards,
Poonam

Hello,
By checking the version management u can see the changes using compare button in the top in version management.
check the any two whcih u want to compare then click on tha compare button then u can see the changes, in differnent colors.
Thank You,
Santhosh

Business Objects Transportation Strategy

Hi,
We are trying to understand BO transportation methodologies like ways we can transport objects between DEV, QAS, and PRD environments. Can anybody provide documentation on BO transportation including SAP presentations as well?
Thanks,
Kris

Hi,
You can trnsfer the Business Objects conetent from one system to another with LCM (above BO XI 3.0) and Import Wizard (below BO XI 3.0).
[Import Wizard|http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir3/en/xi3_bip_importwiz_en.pdf]
[LCM|http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/xi31_LCM_User_en.pdf]
Regards,
Ramu.
Edited by: Gowda Timma Ramu on Nov 23, 2010 12:26 PM

Transport Strategy ERP and DWM

Hi
We are implementing a SAP decentralized WM landscape (DEV,QA & PRD). in a RETAIL environment. We have taken the decision that repository transports between our ERP system and the DWM system will not be automatic (after being severely burned in the past). However now the question has arisen whether customizing transports should be transported between the ERP and DWM system.
As follows :
Should all customizing transports (HR/FI/Retail etc) be transported automatically through to the DWM system.
OR
Should only retail customizing transports be transported automatically to the DWM system and if so, how can we implement this. (Packages assigned to a transport layer with repository objects - how do we do customizing?)
OR
Should customizing transports which are relevant to DWM be done both in the ERP system and the DWM system - ie dual maintenance.
We are trying to implement a strategy that will be robust and simple. Has anyone got any recommendations or advice from systems they have implemented?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks
Leigh

Normally check whether is there any change in R/3 data source when you are transporting the changes in BW system.
So as a practice you need to transport the source system related transport first and then replicate the data source, before moving the transport in BW system. As a practice after the replication you can also activate the data source using the standard program avaialble.
Also you can check the connection between R/3 and BI system before moving the BW related transport which might require the source system should be active in order to check whether the DS is present in R/3 or not. So make sure this point always.
About the DTP's, we are facing this issue in BI7.0 , you need to findout what is causing the issue to deactivate the DTP's.. if there is any change at transformation, then this might can also cause the DTP to go deactivated.
Hope this helps.
Murali
Edited by: Murali M on Aug 24, 2010 1:09 PM

CTS+ Transport Strategy

Dear all,
We are planning to setup CTS+ in our system landscape.
Please provide your inputs, on the pros and cons of this strategy.
Also direct me to links of CTS+ documents on SDN.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Younus

Hi,
CTS+ transport is like ABAP way of doing transport of ABAP objects in r/3..........after deploying CTS+ in your XI system, you can release your objects for CTS+ transport from IR, ID and then a transport request for it will be created for you, which you can then release and finally import it in target system.
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta

Transport error code 8, repaired object

I did some enhancement, added one infoobject, added a couple of fields, to cube, InfoSource, Trans Rule, Update Rule. in SE10 I saw a bunch of routines under "Routines" node, with long names, names starting with 3J3Mxxxx, 3PYAxxxx etc. along with my objects. After the import to QA transport eneded with error code 8, I do not have access to SE03, STMS etc, transport is handled by basis team.
Return code for D40K913272 at Fri Mar 30 12:49:13 EDT 2007 into Q40
2EETW104 "R3TRROUT3J3MIJZVZFS5N7PG9F1ZXJ9D8" was repaired in this system and must not be imported.
2EETW104 "R3TRROUT3J3MIK7KIEDV5U8WF94C7L830" was repaired in this system and must not be imported.
2EETW104 "R3TRROUT3J3MJQ8S9R6I36OCCRXJ8C758" was repaired in this system and must not be imported.
Return code for D40K913272 Q40 / 910 is 8
D40K913272 run time
Some of these routines and rest of the objects were imported successfully. I am having problem with only three routines and I don't know how to identify them.
Why I am getting this error? How do I resolve this error? What are my options? Can I request to repeat the import with repair flag set or something like that as I read it somewhere in the forum or I need to create a new request, if so how do I take care of these problem objects?
Any help will be appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks
Sunil

Soumya,
I am not sure but these could be from transfer rule routines. Sorry for being ignorant but how do I know if these are transfer routines or update rule routines? where do you want me to check, source or target system? I checked RSDIR table, on which values I need to search? As far as I know nothing is deleted from source system. I checked program for transfer program in source system, it had some elements with name starting with GP3J3M* some part of it matched the names I got in the error but it is not a full match.
Now my question is why I am getting this repaired object error, what is the reason for this? How do I make this transport successful? Do I need to create a new request and include all objects again, which will include these objects again as I did not added these routines, they got added by default? What I do with transport which failed?
Please help me with resolving this issue, I'll reward with full points for successful resolution.
Thanks and regards
Sunil

Transport strategy of BI-BO Objects

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for