Transporting of scenario with BPM

Scenario:
Syncronous webservice call -> XI -> BPM (SYNC/ASYNC BRIDGE) -> Async IDOC posting
Guys I have transported the above scenario into my QA system, but I am unable to execute the scenario now successfully.
The adapter engine is showing -
Received XI System Error. ErrorCode: SYSTEM_FAILURE_INTERNAL ErrorText:   ErrorStack: An internal error has occurred
Returning synchronous error notification to calling application: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: XIAdapter:SYSTEM_FAILURE_INTERNAL:.
Transmitting the message using connection http://xi-dev.mycompany:8002/sap/xi/engine?type=entry failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: XIAdapter:SYSTEM_FAILURE_INTERNAL:.
and
Error Category     XI_J2EE_ADAPTER_XI_HANDLER
Error Code                     CALL_CONSUMER_ERROR
TRANS# SXMB-MONI - RED LIGHT
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">SYSTEM_FAILURE_INTERNAL</SAP:Code>
Is anyone able to point me in the general direction, Ive had a look in visual admin. and there doesnt appear to be any errors there. None of the error's I am seeing a pointing me in any real direction.
thanks

Hiiii
A bit generic error. So many things could be checked:
1. In sxi_cache, check the status of ur IP, it should be 0.
2. In SWWL, delete the earlier running instances before running the new scenario.
3. Reimport the IP in ID again. Save, activate and try running ur scenario again.
4. In tcode sxmb_adm_bpe - Automatic BPM Customizing, check for the error.
Call transaction SWF_RFC_DEST and then give background user as WF-BATCH
and password .
Exceute it then SWU3 will be turned from Red to Green Automatically.
OR
The program that you need to schedule is RSWWCOND. The SAP default is to call the job SWWCOND and schedule it to run every 30min. That should get rid of the red cross. And if not, you might find along the way why the Auto-Customising didn't work.
I hope this will resolve your problem
Cheers

Similar Messages

  • Problem in simple filetofile scenario with BPM

    Hi
    I am a starter to XI. I am implementing simple file2file scenario with BPMs.
    But I am getting error while looking into SXMB_MONI.
    Under "Monitor for Processed XML messages"
    Number of XML message Found 3 (which is my input 3 xmls which is fine) but
    "Status is RED Flag".
    "Error Category: BPE_ADAPTER"
    "Error ID: UNKNOWN_MESSAGE".
    Please help me out with this problem.
    Regards
    Sam

    Hi Raj,
    When i click PE getting following error:
    "Unable to perform action for selected message".
    When i double click the row, it takes me to xml message versions where i can RED FLAG for "Call Adapter". In the trace i foudn the below at the end:
    <trace level =1 type=system error> error exception return from pipeline processing"</trace>
    Hope this helps to guide me mroe
    sam

  • XML file to Proxy Scenario with BPM - ID Steps

    Hi Guys,
    Any one can help me to find  about the scenario XML file to ABAP Proxy with BPM, ID steps please. Any link or logical routing, receiver determination and interface determination idea. Please correct me,
    I have created Business Service as sender to send one xml file to BPM, BPM is sending a message to SNC system. I have created 2 receiver determinations, but I am confusing in interface determination, where to declare OM?
    Please can any one respond bit quicker.
    Thanks  in advance
    Regards
    San

    ES Repository
                         *Service Interfaces*
    Create one outbound service interface for XML file.
    Create one Inbound synchronous Interface for SNC system.
    Create one Abstract Asynchronous interface ,same message type as you used for outbound service interface .This is for Integration process receive step.
    Create one Abstract async interface for receiving the response from SNC system in Integration process.
    Create one Abstract synchronous interface to be used in the Integration process for Send sync step.
    Create on inbound asyn service interface for sending the response from integration process (received from SNC system) to the Receiver System.
                  Operation Mapping.
    Create an Operation Mapping using Abstract sync interface and inbound syn interfaces.
                  Integration Process
    start--->receive Step---->send Synchronous step----->send step.
    Create two container elements
    first with abstrat async interface for the XML request.
    second for abstract asyn interface with the XML response structure (asyn receiver system structure)
    In the send sync step select your abstract syn interface from the F4 help.and select the corresponding request and response message from the container element you defined earlier.
    Integration Directory.
    Create one sender File adapter Communication channel for XML file reading.
    Create two receiver communication channel for sync system(receiver XI adapte for ABAP PROXY) and other for asyn receiver system .
    Create 3 receiver determination
    1.from sender to Integration process.
    2.from Integration process to SNC system.
    3. from Integration process to Asyn Receiver System.
    Create 3 Interface determination.
    Specify Operation mapping while you are creating interface determination from Integration Process to Syn BS.
    Create one sender agreement
    Create two Receiver agreement.
    Regards
    Kubra Fatima.

  • IDoc to soap synchronous scenario with BPM

    Hi,
    I am working on IDoc to soap synchronous scenario using BPM. Here i am facing lot of soap exceptions in my production system. I handled the exceptions. The data getting excuted for the first time, the same data(just changed the description)is giving exceptions for the second time. Please let me know why the exceptions are getting, and different type of exceptions and solutions for the same.(Blog also is fine)
    Thanks & Regards,
    Pragathi.

    The data getting excuted for the first time, the same data(just changed the description)is giving exceptions for the second
    time.
    Ideally you should not get an exception for the same data....can you tell is the description and where are you getting the exception...is it a part of the SOAP message or some object?
    An exception might have occured because the description would be something unacceptable by the target application.
    and different type of exceptions and solutions for the same
    there would be many blogs....your thread would be spammed...better make a search on SDN with exception text that you are getting.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Soap to File Scenario with BPM

    Hi Guys
    I have create my Soap to File Scenario using BPM to split the file on "Transformation step" into 7 files and it must save these files to my FTP Server, when testing on sxmb_moni I don't get any errors but when checking on the FTP server no files are created, and I understand that it should be showing all seven processing on the sxmb_moni, but that is not happening.
    I have used the ForEach mode on my Block.
    What could I be doing wrong.
    Thanks!!
    Yonela

    go to runtime work bench to see communication channel, especailly the receiver channel.
    To see what happened on it

  • Step by step File to RFC Scenario with BPM

    hi
    for the following scenario i m following the webblog
    /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    i have successfully created the design phase
    in the configuration stage
    i need to create a business system or business service will do to create the communication channel
    i have not created the systems so i feel i should not create the business systems
    i would like to create the business service
    so in only one business service can i assign all the communication channel
    useful answers will be rewarded
    Regards
    JM

    There are 3 parts of communication: Sender service to Integration Process (Asynch.), Integration Process to RFC (Synch.), Integration Process to Receiver Service (Asynch.)
    The configurations should be like as follows:
    <b>Sender Service to IP</b>
    Receiver determination:
    Sender Service->Request Outbound Message Interface->Integration Processs.
    Interface Determination:
    Sender Service->request Outbound Message Interface->Integration Process->Request Outbound Abstract Interface. (No interface Mapping is required as the interfaces share the same structure.)
    Sender Agreement:
    Sender Service->request Outbound Message Interface->Integration Process->Request Outbound Abstract Interface>FileRFC_Send
    <b>IP to RFC</b>
    Receiver determination:
    Integration Process->Request Outbound Abstract Interface->Business service.
    Interface Determination:
    Integration Process->Request Outbound Abstract Interface->Business service->RFC Structure->Corresponding Interface Mapping between file structure and RFC structure.
    Receiver Agreement:
    Integration Process->Request Outbound Abstract Interface->Business service->RFC_Receiver
    <b>IP to Receiver Service:</b>
    Receiver determination:
    Integration Process->Response Inbound Abstract Interface->Business service.
    Interface Determination:
    Integration Process->Response Inbound Abstract Interface->Business service->Response Inbound Message Interface. (No interface Mapping is required as the interfaces share the same structure)
    Receiver Agreement:
    Integration Process->Response Inbound Abstract Interface->Business service->FileRFC_Receive.
    Hope you find this useful.
    Regards,
    Amitabha

  • Integration scenario with BPM

    Hi all,
    I have an integration scenario: iDoc -> XI -> iDoc,
    On the XI I use a BPM process.
    1. On the Repository:
    I have designed the integration process on the IR, and imported the needed iDoc.
    I have created an integration scenario which consists of two SAP R/3 SWC, and an XI3.0 SWC.
    The XI3.0 is assigned to the integration process.
    2. On the Directory:
    I am using the wizard to configure the scenario.
    I have assigned the R/3 SWC to the required business systems.
    I have created a service named "ProcessBPM" for the integration process and assigned it to the XI SWC.
    all other objects(receiver determination, interface determination... etc.) were created automatically by the wizard.
    when I send the iDoc to the XI, I get an error on the SXMB_MONI:
    Unable to convert sender service ProcessBPM to an ALE logical system.
    What does this error mean ? What have I missed ?
    Is this the way to do the described scenario ?
    Thank you,
    Elad.

    Hi Elad,
    one second
    >>I have entered the logical system name of my XI,
    you enter logical names for r3 business systems (idoc sender or receiver)
    >>Logical system <LS_Name> already exists in service <Service_Name>".
    they have to be unique
    if you're using BMP - try replacing the business system in "header mapping" (sender system) in receiver agreement
    (to your r3 - the one with the unique LS name) - this way you'll be able to use the name as many times as you want:)
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5d/112d20f6ce6c46ba66afb98d278fbd/content.htm
    Regards,
    michal
    Message was edited by: Michal Krawczyk

  • Issue in File to RFC to File Scenario with BPM using Block Step

    Hi Everybody,
                           I am doing File to RFC to File Scenario for multiple records using BPM using Block Step. The File Message is getting posted and after that, the message is getting stuck up in the qRFC Monitor (Inbound Queue).
                        After seeing the message in Inbound Queue, I am trying to execute and release the message. But when i execute the LUW, it says " Function module doesnt exist or EXCEPTION raised" in Inbound queue.
    Could somebody suggest me the outcome of this? What does this mean and how to
    release the stuck up message in Queue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    N.Jayanth Kumar

    Hi Rajesh,
                           After going through the blog, i saw the trace messages. It says      
    " The   exception occurred (program: CL_SWF_XI_INBOUND=============CP, include CL_SWF_XI_INBOUND=============CM00F, line: 19)"
    Regards,
    N.Jayanth Kumar

  • Scenario's performance with BPM vs without BPM in PI 7

    hello,
    Please send me the presentation, blogs describing the performance issues in PI 7
    also, the docs differenciating a normal scenario's performance (without BPM) vs the scenario with BPM...
    What are the enhancements made to BPM in PI 7 for performance increase?
    Regards,
    Nikhil.
    ******Each useful reply will be awarded*******
    Edited by: nikhil a on Feb 7, 2008 6:10 AM

    BPM Performance:  Integration processes are executed on the Integration Server at runtime by the Business Process Engine. Since the Integration Server is the central resource for message exchange, you must ensure that it is not overloaded; otherwise, this can lead to bottlenecks or performance problems.
    Resource Consumption
    Every step of an integration process uses Integration Server resources.
    &#9679;      Every message that is sent to the Process Engine is duplicated.
    &#9679;      Every message that is sent from the Process Engine is duplicated.
    &#9679;      A work item is created for the process itself and for every step the process contains.
    This means that for a process that just receives one message that is sent without being processed further, four messages and three work items are created.
    For this reason, you must ensure that you take Integration Server resources into account when you define integration processes. 
    Resource Consumption of Different Step Types and Transactional Behavior
    Different step types consume different amounts of system resources:
    &#9679;      Step types with high resource consumption:
    •     &#9675;       Receive step
    •     &#9675;       Send step
    Asynchronous send steps with acknowledgments in particular consume a lot of system resources. In the case of synchronous send steps, consumption depends on the target system.
    •     &#9675;       Receiver determination
    •     &#9675;       Transformation step
    In transformation steps, resource consumption is dependent on the mapping called. In general, process steps that generate work items internally are relevant for process performance. Transformation steps (either for message split or merge) also include a mapping step and can be quite expensive. This should be taken into consideration during scenario design.
    •     &#9675;       Block
    •     &#9675;       Wait step
    &#9679;      Step types with low resource consumption:
    •     &#9675;       Control step
    •     &#9675;       Multiple condition
    •     &#9675;       Fork
    •     &#9675;       Loop
    •     &#9675;       Undefined step
    If you design the transactional behavior of an integration process so that the following steps are not performed as separate transactions, you can improve performance significantly:
    &#9679;      Transformation step
    &#9679;      Receiver determination
    &#9679;      Send step (synchronous or asynchronous)
    Transactional Behavior of an Integration Process 
    Use
    You can now influence transactional behavior in the definition of an integration process in the process editor.  This enables you to improve performance.
    Transaction:
    A transaction is a sequence of processing steps that are either fully executed, or not executed at all. If the system cannot fully execute a transaction, it rolls back all processing steps within the transaction. This means that the system can return to the state before the transaction was begun.
    The transaction control mechanism for integration processes is not a central transaction manager for an entire system landscape. The transaction control mechanism cannot roll back any processing steps outside the Integration Server.
    Transaction Boundaries
    You have the option of defining the start or end of a block as the boundary of a transaction.
    &#9679;      In the case of the start of a block, you can define that the system is to start a new transaction.
    &#9679;      In the case of the end of a block, you can define that the system is to end the transaction being started (COMMIT WORK). The system ends the transaction that is currently open, regardless of whether it has been started or not. For example, if no new transaction was started at the start of the block, the last transaction started is continued instead.
    By making appropriate settings for the start and end of a block you can expand transactions. This means that the database needs to be accessed less often, and enables you to improve system performance
    Transactional Behavior for Specific Step Types
    At runtime, the system normally creates a separate transaction for each step. The transaction then covers this step only. However, you can influence the transactional behavior of particular step types. In the step properties, you can define that the system is not to start a new transaction when the step is executed. The system then executes the step in the transaction that was started at the time of execution. Consequently, no background work item is created for the step and the database does not need to be accessed. In this way you can improve system performance.
    You can influence the transactional behavior of the following step types:
    &#9679;      Send step
    You can influence the transactional behavior when sending messages both synchronously and asynchronously, and when sending acknowledgments
    •     Transformation Step
    •     Receiver Determination Step
    Optimizing Transactional Behavior:
    &#9679;      Memory requirements
    Expanding transactions and executing specific steps without creating a new transaction may increase the burden on the main memory. If the burden on the main memory is too great, you must redefine transactions, or define that a new transaction is to be created for the step concerned.
    &#9679;      Troubleshooting in the workflow log
    The technical view of the workflow log does not show any detailed information for steps for which no work item was created. If an error occurs, the workflow log displays the error information for the last executed step. The following example illustrates this:
    A process contains a transformation step that is executed within an expanded transaction. When the transformation step is executed, an error occurs in mapping and the system rolls back the transaction. Since no work item was created for the transformation step, the workflow log does not have an entry for the transformation step. The error information is entered in the last executed step in the workflow log.
    EXAMPLE:
    For an example of resource consumption, see the BPM scenario described in the XI sizing guide:
    The inbound SOAP messages are handed over to the BPE, which triggers a two-step process consisting of message reception and sending. The processed messages are then sent to a receiver by using the SOAP channel; no mapping.
    The SAPS value for this scenario, in which 10 kB messages are processed, is 1300 (processing one process instance each second). A simple XI proxy scenario, for example, requires 140 SAPS process-ing one message each second. This gives you an idea of the resource requirements using BPM.
    Example:
    In the original implementation, two separate JCBC calls were made to retrieve a sales order document header and the line items. This data then was transformed to the IDoc format of the receiving application using a transformation. Then, using a loop step, one IDoc at a time was sent to the backend application. - This sub optimal design resulted in poor performance caused by following design flaws:
                    Separate retrieval of header and line items with the JDBC adapter
                   Transformation within ccBPM to combine retrieved header and line items
                   IDoc back end connection for one document at the time
    In the improved version below, both the JDBC call and the transformation were removed from the ccBPM. The retrieval of the source messages is done via a synchronous call with two mappings in the integration engine of XI that generate the required format for the receiving system. Therefore, it is not necessary to add an additional transformation step in the ccBPM. Additionally, the IDoc adapter connecting to the target system is used to handle multiple IDocs inside one XI message. Therefore, it is not necessary to add a loop operation within the ccBPM either. – In this particular implementation, the described changes resulted in a 20x performance improvement!
    IMP LINKS:
    3bf550d4-0201-0010-b2ae-8569d193124e.pdf
    43e8e190-0201-0010-3ea1-d6f996cb4124.pdf
    70ada5ef-0201-0010-1f8b-c935e444b0ad.pdf
    c071d7bb-0601-0010-d6b8-f4e4dc7f1e20.pdf

  • Error in file2file with bpm

    iam trying to do file2file scenario with bpm
    file is picking up from input and does not put in output.
    adapters is working fine for this.
    i got an error that "no object found for this message"
    in sxi_cache return code is 99
    in swf_customizing----
    there is some error in like  "error loading hr control data".
    where it went wrong.plz provide solution.

    Hi,
    First do the Cache refresh and then try it once.
    Go throgh the following links , it may solve your problem
    BPE_ADAPTER error on async BPM
    BPM (IP) Error: "No object type found for this message [...]"
    No object type found for this message
    Regards
    Sridhar Goli

  • File to idoc with BPM

    Hi All,
         I have  one  File to IDoc Scenario. Now I want to throw  posting error in a file.
    i.e., if mapping goes not well and when IDoc is being sent to Recipient system then if any posting error is encountered, then a file(Flat file) will be created at sending system side.
         I am planning to design this scenario with BPM. Now end user requires a akwoledgement for this scenario eithere it may be succsess or failure in file format. If succsess the file will be created with succsess information(any format), either failure also file will be created with error information. The user requires only file format b'coz this file will be read by another java application (user didn't require to his mail).
    Can anybody suggest the solution for this:
    1. How to generate aknowledgement file for sucsess or failure.
    2. How to use this file to idoc scenario in BPM with out using Alert configuration or Mail adapter.
    Regards,
    Konala.

    Hi,
    As you know Idocs are used for asynch communication, only was to get acknowledgemnet is using ALEAUDIT. For your scenario there can be one work around. When you post IDoc in the, in that function module after the posting is done call one more RFC with the the success/failure message which will trigger RFC to File sceanrio.
    If you get any other solution, please post it back to same thread.
    Thanks,
    Prateek

  • Michal's weblog ---How it can be done with BPM ?

    HI,
    I am trying to do a File To XML multiline scenario using BPM. When I check IP I am getting the following error
    <b><u>"Expression must not return a multiline value".</u></b>
    How can I do File To XML multiline scenario using BPM ? I know we can do without BPM
    Any useful information is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    ss
    Message was edited by:
            s s

    Hi Vijay,
    I wanted to do Michal's weblog
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2004/12/15/how-to-send-a-flat-file-with-fixed-lengths-to-xi-30-using-a-central-file-adapter
    using BPM.
    Like file to file with BPM, I have created IP and when I checked, I was getting the above error.
    My question---> Is it possible to do multiline scenario with BPM ?
    help pls.
    Thanks,
    ss
    Message was edited by:
            s s
    Message was edited by:
            s s

  • FILE2FILE with BPM

    Hi All,
    Now i am working on FILE2FILE scenario with BPM Asynchronous.
    i created 4 message interfaces.
    1.BPM_SENDER_MI
    2.BPM_SENDER_MI_ABSTRACT
    3.BPM_RECEIVER_MI
    4.BPM_RECEIVER_MI_ABSTRACT
    Message Mapping is
    BPM_SENDER_MT2BPM_RECEIVER_MT
    Interface Mapping is
    BPM_SENDER_MI_ABSTRACT2BPM_RECEIVER_MI_ABSTRACT
    My Integration Process:
    Receove--->Transformation--->Send.
    Now i got confusion in Integration Directory.
    Please let me clear that,
    how many comm channels required ?
    And how many receiver determinations, interface determinations, sender agreements & receiver agreements required for me?
    Anybody have the solution, Please get back to me ASAP.
    I am very thankful to you in advance.
    Regards,
    Nagarjuna.

    Hi Nagarjuna,
    if inside your BPM you really have only ONE transformation, then I suggest to you do NOT use a BPM, because it's not necessary !
    your performance will decrease with the BPM... (remind BPM=workflow).
    Moreover if you have NOT a BPM, your config will be easier:
    Sender --> Mapping --> Receiver
    Note: and in SXI_MONITOR you will have ONE message line.
    And in case of BPM, you have;
    1. Sender --> (no mapping) --> BPM
    2. BPM --> (no mapping) --> Receiver
    Remind: the mapping is done in your BPM.
    Note: and in SXI_MONITOR you will have TWO message lines.
    So there is no good point use BPM if you just have one transformation into your BPM.
    BPM has to be used when you want to impelement a workflow flow, with correlation, alert, merge, split, etc...
    Hope this help.
    Mickael
    Edited by: Mickael Huchet on Apr 15, 2008 8:23 AM

  • Want Scenarios for BPM

    Hi All,
    Can anybody pl. provide some BPM Scenarios, BPM Docs, or any related Docs for BPM.
    i want some  Scenarios for BPM.
    Thanks in advance,
    Shweta

    Hi Shwetha,
    BPM is used for Stateful communications,suppose u have to delay message processing,or wait for other messages to arrive and then semd them all together,in that case use BPM.
    We will use BPM when ever we want to do the following:
    1.Controling or Monitoring of messages in XI
    2. Collect or Merge the messages in XI
    3. Split the messages in XI
    4. Multicast a Message
    5. Need to send an Alert
    6. Transformation
    With its BPM capability, SAP NetWeaver:
    • Exploits business-process efficiency by giving your business
    users the ability to directly model, manage, monitor, and
    analyze business processes
    • Enables continuous process improvement and the dynamic
    modification of business processes
    • Extends the value of your company’s core business investment
    and maximizes the return on its strategic assets by providing
    the ability to change process rules without additional IT
    investment
    • Provides greater visibility into critical business operations for
    better decision making by delivering the right information at
    the right time
    • Allows the integration of people, applications, and internal
    and external resources
    Process step types:
    Message relevant:
    Receive: We use it to receive a message. By receiving a message we are sending the data into process. We can use it to start a process. We can use it for activating or using correlations.
    Send: We use it to send either an asynchronous or synchronous message or an acknowledgement.
    Receiver Determination: We use it to get a list of receivers for sub sequent send step. It calls the receiver determination that we configured in the integration directory and returns receivers list.
    Transformation: We use it to change a message inside the process. E.g. bundling multiple messages into 1 or splits a message into multiple.
    Using this we can create N:1 or 1:N or 1:1 transformations. In general scenario 1:N transformation is possible.
    Process flow control Relevant:
    Container: We use it to set a value for target container element at runtime. Target container element and assigned value must have same value.
    Control: We use it to terminate the current process and to trigger an exception and to trigger an alert.
    While Loop: To repeat the execution of steps within the loop.
    Fork: We use it when you want to continue a process in branches that are independent of each other. E.g. to communicate with two systems that are independent to each other
    Block: We use it to combine steps that you want to execute one after the other and which are to access the local data.
    Empty: It has no influence on the process flow. We use it as a place holder for a step that has not yet been defined, and as a step with no functions for test purposes.
    Wait: We use it to incorporate a delay in the process.
    Switch: We use it to define different processing branches for a process
    T.Codes for B.P.M:
    SXMB_MONI_BPE
    SXWF_XI_SW11
    For Example a Small Explanation reg BPM for this Req we used BPM
    A background program should be scheduled to run every 10 minutes to analyse any material records that have been created or changed or deleted that have occurred to the material master records in the last minute.
    There are two Message Mappings involved in the whole scenario. First mapping is N:1 Mapping which will be used in BPM and second Mapping is 1:1 Mapping:
    1. First Message Mapping  N: 1 u2013 Mapping between IDoc (occurrence u2013 0...unbounded in u201CMessagesu201D tab) to IDoc with changed occurrence of its top node (IDOC) as 0...unbounded. This message mapping will be used in BPM u2013 transformation step.
    Description: This BPM collects all Idocs for 10 minutes which are of Message Type (ZMATMAS05) according to Receiver Partner Number (Field u2013 RCVPRN) and calls N: 1 mapping to bundle the collected Idocs in a One External Definition for that IDOC.
    Use
    You use a wait step ( ) to incorporate a delay in a process. Usually, you use a delay to define when the next step in the process is to start. You can define a delay as either a point in time or a period of time.
    At runtime, the step waits until the specified point in time is reached or the specified period of time has passed. The system then continues the process by proceeding with the next step.
    Expalined clearly how to do a file to file scenario with BPM :
    /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm
    it is File>RFC>File using BPM then refer this blog.
    /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    BPM-1 /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm
    BPM-2 /people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2006/04/08/reconciliation-of-messages-in-bpm
    BPM-3 /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    BPM-4 /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/11/xi-how-to-retrieve-messageid-from-a-bpm
    Integratio Scenario
    /people/venkat.donela/blog/2006/02/17/companion-guide-to-integration-scenario
    /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/27/modeling-integration-scenario146s-in-xi
    Schedule BPM
    /people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/22/schedule-your-bpm
    Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
    /people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
    Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in ccBPM
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    without BPM
    /people/henrique.pinto/blog/2007/08/02/syncasync-scenarios-without-bpm
    without BPM1
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
    IDOC BPM
    /people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/07/27/idocs-multiple-types-collection-in-bpm
    To deal with Multiple sender and receivers based on the conditions we could use BPM. Its one of the feature of BPM, but its not mandatory to go for BPM for each n every case. Its depends upon scnenario.
    /people/marilyn.pratt/blog/2007/10/12/clubhouse-las-vegas-a-bpm-roadmap
    BPM Process Patterns:Repeatable Design for BPM Process Models
    http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/05%2D06%2DWP%2DBPMProcessPatterns%2DAtwood1%2Epdf
    BPM Steps link : http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
    Regards,
    Vinod.

  • File to RFC scenario with no BPM

    I want to create File to RFC scenario with no BPM. I want to invoke RFC synchronously to verify that I'm getting correct response back, but i dont wanna process the response. So, In SXMB_MONI i can check the response back from RFC right? Or do I need to have BPM if want to see the response back from RFC?
    What kind of business system i need to create for RFC? can i use same business system for both File and RFC? I'm using one Business System created on Third party technical system, which i'm using for file Input, also for RFC. Is that OK?
    Thanks,
    Deepesh

    Hi,
    I need to have BPM if want to see the response back from RFC? ... yes
    The BPM will help you find the response very comfortable.
    What kind of business system i need to create for RFC? can i use same business system for both File and RFC? I'm using one Business System created on Third party technical system, which i'm using for file Input, also for RFC. Is that OK? ..Yes you can .
    Regards
    Agasthuri Doss

Maybe you are looking for