Transportmanagemt for 2 systems landscape

Hello!
I am about to set up the client dependent TMS for the following 2 systems landscape:
system FID: client 100 (Customizing) , client 200 (Test)
system FIP: client 100 (Productive client)
In my current solution I put the transport target group between the two systems, so I can send the transports to the several clients.
Now I would like to replace transport target group with the client dependent transport routes:
consolidation route: ZFID --> 200
consolidation route: SAP --> 200
(both for the transport from FID 100 to FID 200)
delivery route: Delivery 200 --> 100
(route from FID 200 to the FIP 100)
My goal is to develop in client 100 (FID), to test in client 200 (FID), and if everything ok, to transport to the client 100 (FIP).
<b>My question: Can I apply the second solution in order to realize better my goal?</b>Which advantages/disadvantages has the second solution

Hi Thom,
I guess the advantage is with your second solution that you have something more like a traditional three-system-landscape. However because your development and test clients are on the same instance you're introducing some additional admin by applying transports for development objects (that are almost entirely client independent) back into 200, which really you don't need.
I feel the volume and type of transport you typically do will influence if the second solution is worthwhile. If you make lots of development changes you're probably best staying as you are. If your changes are mostly config, the change is worthwhile.
Regards,
Nick

Similar Messages

Solman configration for system landscape having virtual buffers

Hi All,
We are having a system landscape with virtual buffers in the TMS.TMS transport path look like this
*Dev -> Virtual Buffer -> Quality -> Virtual Buffer -> Production*
We need to configure ChaRM for this landscape. We are able to get virtual system details in Solman and created the project. But ChaRM is failing while we try to import the transport requests to Quality.
Can you please guide us to configure solman for this landscape.
Thanks in Advance,
Shaju

hi,
if the goal is to have a better control of what is going to QA
the move to the QA happens anyway in 2 steps
you might want to control the release in your development (via solman). In this case just control the action "test transport"
you might want to control the import in QA. In this cas you manually import in QA
I don't see the added value to have an extra virtual system
SOLMAn will support your process with real system. You can send to a virtual system why not (we are using this technique for other reason), but it is a dead end
TMS won't support your landscape scheme because the move of a transport to the next system is related to the import from the previous system. If it is a virtual buffer you won't have the possibility to import it virtually.
Unless a Guru knows a magic trick I am convinced a virtual path won't work in our case.
I hope my explanations were enough to explain the constrains we have
best regards

MySAP HR system landscape

Hi
Please provide the following help for installation
1. What would be the mySAP HR system landscape
2. What would be the component of mySAP HR
3. Does it containts ABAP & JAVA engine both
4. How many servers are required for this
Any guide line documents , pl send
Regards
Vimal Pathak

Hi Vimal
customer specific system landscapes for an application as large as SAP ERP depend on many factors. It is thus not possible to give you "the" SAP ERP - Human Capital Management System landscape, without knowing which functions this HCM Landscape should support, where, in which languages.... (i.e. for some processes a pure SAP ECC System is sufficient, for others, you need a portal and Process integration as well)
For this reasons, the already mentioned SAP ERP 6.0 Master Guide takes a planning-support-approach. It discusses four different "typical" reference system landscapes (Minimal System Landscape,..... Individual/ Distributed Landscape), and extends them to different possible example landscapes, to show you how to plan your own landscape.
The example system landscape for HCM shown there assumes, that you intend to install the complete scope, and that you need firewalls, because this HCM landscape should support external recruiting scenarios as well.
Closeley related to the planning process for system landscapes is the process component list (service.sap.com/scl), where you find information about which SAP ERP process needs which software component, and is available in which countries/ languages.
regards,
Andreas R

No option for system creation in system landscape.

Hello all,
I have the super admin role and i have checked the permission for applications in Syst Admin -> Permission ->Applications, it shows " owner " but still i am not getting the option for system creation when i go to Sys Admin->Sys Conf->Sys landscape->
It is only showing the option to create folders, change ID and Refresh. Earlier I used to get the option and i have created some "Systems" but now niether i can create nor i can open the existing system objects.
Thanks,
Neil

Hi,
Try by assigning administrator role for the user. it will work.
If not come again.

Transport target for business system not found in System Landscape Director

Folks,
We have new installed new PI 7.1 system and importing interfaces from the OLD XI 3.0 system in to new PID 7.1 system.
We are getting following error when we try to import an interfaces in to new PID system:
Import failed because of business system transfer object
Communication component XID_FileSystem: Obligatory
transport target for business system XID_FileSystem not found in
System Landscape Directory
We are yet to install PIQ system.
All the interfaces in the old XID system have transport target of XIQ system. I removed the transport taget for the interface, but transport target is still showing in the Business system under transport target head.
How can we overcome this issue as we will not have PIQ system atleast for two weeks.
Thanks in advance,
Regards
Chandu

Hi,
You need to maintain Transport Groups and target for business systems while SLD transports between your XI system and PI 7.1
Illustrated with DEv & PRD here.
Procedure:
1) Call Integration Builder screen on DEV Server with http://hostname:J2ee Port/rep
2) Call SLD (System Landscape Directory) Component from the Integration builder
Save all the Following .zip files on the Local Desktop
3) Select the Software Component & say Export that you want to Export from DEV
Server to Production server and which is going to use in the IR of XI
4) Also Select the Product of the above SWC and say Export
5) Select the Technical Systems (TS of XI & TS of the SAP R/3) and say Export
6) Select the Business System(s) & say Export; those are associated with above Exported
Technical systems.
In Production Server
1) Logon to the SLD of the Production Server.
2) Create a Technical System and Business system which points to the Production SAP R/3
3) Go to Administration TAB in the main page of SLD
4) Select the Import option to Import the SWC , PRD, TS,& BS which we Exported Earlier in DEV Server
5) Click on Browse and select the .zip files that is to Import into Production Server,
Which were stored on the local desktop at the time of DEV Server Export
And say Import Selected File Option
By this we exported and imported the SLD Objects
Now we have to create transport groups and transport targets in the Production server of SLD
Creation of Transport Groups
Edit GroupsGroup1) Select the Business systems
2) Click on New Group and give the name of the group as DEV_group & select the
Corresponding Development serveru2019s integration Server
3) Similar way create another group for Production serveru2019s business system as
PRD_group and select the Production serveru2019s integration Server
Creation of transport targets
This is to Define which business systems in two different groups correspond to each other
1) Select each Business system in the SLD and select transport TAB---click on
Add/Change Target and select its corresponding target business system.
For Example:
If you select the business system of Production XI server means
In the target you have to select group as DEVGROUP and the business system of Development XI server.
Like this do the same for other business systems also
Ex:
BS_PRD_Integration Server----
BS_DEV_Inetration Server
How to create Transport Groups & transport Targets
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ef/a21e3e0987760be10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards
Seshagiri

Setting Up the System Landscape for ESS

Hello Experts,
I am implementing ESS in portal.
I am in step of defining systems in portal for ESS/MSS.
Below is link I am following from help.sap.com
[Link|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/5b/76a6d7fd3a4e91bfb422405bf3e04d/frameset.htm]
In above link it is mentioned that we have to define following systems :
SAP_WebDynpro_XSS
SAP_ECC_HumanResources
SAP_ECC_Travel
SAP_ITS_XSS
SAP_BSP_EREC
Additionaly according to below Article in SDN :
[Link|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/21eb036a-0a01-0010-25a3-b2224432640a?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Following additional systems must be created :
SAP_ITS_EBU Looks similar to SAP_ITS_XSS above
SAP_R3_Financials
Now the basis person in my project has handed over to me following systems :
SAP_BSP_EREC
SAP_ITS_FND Name mismatch as FND is used in place of XSS or EBU
SAP_R3_Financials
SAP_WebDynpro_ESS Name mismatch as ESS is used in place of XSS
Now below two systems are altogether missing as per first link on help.sap.com
SAP_ECC_HumanResources
SAP_ECC_Travel
Please explain if it requires to be corrected or name mismatch and missing ststems would do.
Thanking you in anticipation.

All the above names that you are referring to are not necessarily separate systems.
These are system aliases for a system object created in your portal via System Administration - System landscape.
So, if you have HR and Finance on the same backend server, then you need only one system with the related system aliases.
You will need SAP_BSP_EREC only if you are planning on using E-recruitment.
Similarly, you will need SAP_ITS_XSS only if you are planning on using any ITS applications.
It is pretty straight forward to change/correct the names of your system aliases instead of changing the usage of these aliases every where else.
SAP_ECC_HumanResources is absolutely necessary.
SAP_ECC_Travel is required if you are planning on using travel and expense related applications.
Also, note that SAP_WebDynpro_XSS should be the alias of the system where your webdynpro applications are deployed (typically the same portal server)
- Shanti

One BW system for several landscapes ??????

Guys I would really apprciate some advice. In the past I have set up BW systems for a landscape consisting of APO, ECC, SRM and of course the BW system to support these.
I am now working for a company that has several ECC production systems live and some of these landscapes also have SRM. For the new landscape that we will be installing, consisting of SRM, ECC I have the opportunity of also installing a BW landscape, alternativly we could use a BW system that is already there in another landscape.
My thoughts are that we share the BW system with another landscape as there could well be some reports that we could use, also is it the idea that there should be a consolidate data warehouse extarcting data from different systems in diffenet landscapes in to one BW system
Any help appreciated ......

Hi,
with harmonization I mean, you need to make sure each e.g. material will come unique from each system. So with material no. 4711 you will always get a dish washer from each system and not a dish washer from system A and a car from system B.
Hope that helps
regards
Siggi

Requesting more than 10 system roles in SMSY for one landscape

Hi everyone
We are looking to have the possibility to create more than 10 customer defined system roles in SMSY for one landscape. The current limitation prevents us to fully take advantage of our multi-client landscape designed to accept a dev path and a data load path at the same time as a testing path. For one data load server, we might have up to 9 or 10 different clients being used. This permits us to manage several cycles of data loads at a single time.
Has anyone else ever requested to have more than 10 customer defined system roles per landscape created?
Happy new year and thank for the prompt responses
Nelson Julien
Project manager, Solution Manager

Hi Udo
For our logical component ECC 6.0, here are the items
Configuration (client 020) (client defined)
This is used for configuration
Configuration target (client defined)
This is used as a target for transport groups
Development system (SAP delivered)
This is used for ABAP work
Development Target (client defiened)
This is used as a target for transport groups
Development UTC (client 040) (client defiened)
This is used for unit test work from the 020 and 030 clients
Object repository (D01 030) (client defiened)
This is used to store development objects, we relocate object ownership from here and to here once work has gone to production
QI1-320 / HRQ-130 / HRQ-141 (client defiened)
This regroups clients from our R/3 logical componant (QI1-320) used for initial tests, our ECC 6.0 logical componant (HRQ-130) also used for initial testing and our ECC 6.0 data load logical componant (HRQ-141) used for the data initial testing
Evaluation system (SAP delivered)
This is for the sandbox
Quality assurance system (SAP delivered)
This is used for the initial testing
CI4-320 / HRQ-132 / HRQ142 (client defiened)
This regroups clients from our R/3 logical componant (QI1-320) used for integration tests, our ECC 6.0 logical componant (HRQ-130) also used for integration testing and our ECC 6.0 data load logical componant (HRQ-141) used for the data integration testing
Production system (SAP delivered)
well, you know...
Training system (SAP delivered)
This is used for training
Dev security (client 900) (client defiened)
This is used for security work
Security target (client defiened)
This is used as a target for transport groups
Dataload 1 (HRQ 140) (client defiened)
Initial client for data loads
SAP reference system (SAP delivered)
This is the reference system for this landscape
In the future, we are looking to add to these in order to accomodate projects and production support.
Thank you
Nelson Julien
Project Manager, Solution Manager

Three-system landscape for Business Objects

Hello!
I'm new at Business Objects and I don't have imagination about it landscape. Do I need to make three-system landscape (D Q P) for BO with broadcasting to BI (D Q P) systems correspondingly? Or maybe I need make all customizing in one BO system? Could someone advice any documentation about lanscape for BO and BI?
Thank

Hi
Please refer this site for Business objects
http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/
Regards
Prashant

Information on 3-System Landscape for XI

Hi All,
Currently we have DEV/QA XI as one system and Prod as another. We plan to seperate QA and have a 3 system landscape for XI... ie, DEV, TEST, PROD.
My Question is
> Any documents on what are the system requirements in doing so?
> Is there any advantage/disadvantage in doing this?
Pavan.

The sysetm configuration might be 2Gb+ Ram with good storage of Harddrive....there can be problem when you have both the dev and QA system on the same server or same instance with dfiferent client......
It;s better to have the Different system for DEV,QA and Production but as far as SLD is concerened standard says to maintain the single SLD but for production it will be good if kept seperate SLD.

Quick question on BOE deployment for SAP BW with 3 system landscape

Client has SAP BW environment with 3 system landscape: Dev, QA, Production
Should BOE be installed seperately on 3 different machines for each of them?
Or is there any best practice for this?
Thanks,
Henry

Hello Henry,
yes - i would recommend this Setup. Technically there is no need for it but on an organisational/development/deployment level it makes more sence.
I often saw it at customers that Dev and Q&A is on virtual machines and Prod is on a physically machines. Saves some Hardware costs.
Regards
-Seb.

Track for 4 system landscape

Hi,
Our system landscape including Dev, Stress,QA and Production systems and we want to define runtime systems for a track by defining four systems. So, that we can transport our Software Component from DEV > Stress > Test > Production.
In NWDI there are only three options to add runtime systems (DEV/Test/Prod) for single track.
Can any one please tell me, if there is some option to define our fourth system as runtime system for same track?
Thanks & Regards
Srinivas.

Hi Kenny,
wow, don't bring the hard stuff out.
To answer the question:
With the so-called "track connections" you can design your transport landscape in any possible way. No matter if you have two, three, four or twenty NW AS Java that need to be covered.
For info regarding track connections have a look at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/13/602b27f6fb41b4a9eb4f72eabb9832/frameset.htm.
Best regards,
Timo

Charm configuration for a 4 system landscape

Hi Experts,
We are planning to implement charm for a 4 system landscape: Development Server, Integration Server, Quality Server and Production Server.
We could configure TMS related steps, activated Charm in Solution Manager, created a maintenance project in solar_project_admin.
However, the standard delivered transaction types like Normal correction and Urgent Correction are not working in a 4 system landscape. They are only working for 3 systems (DEV, QAS and PRD).
Are there any documents or blogs that would specially explain all the steps required for 4 systems? Any kind of help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ravali

Development --> Integration --> Quality --> Production.
First, I will import the transport of copies into integration
Yes, and you test the changes here.
Second, the whole transport is released and imported to Integration - in the Test phase of the maintenance cycle and NC status being consolidated.
Third - Now, keeping the maintenance cycle in the TEST phase and NC phase in consolidated, will I be able to schedule the transport into quality server?
Nope. You consolidate your normal correction, which releases your original transport and import them into Integration, and then immediately into Quality (you already proved it worked in Integration) BEFORE you set the phase to Test. Otherwise the original transports are NOT released. And if you set your phase to Test before importing the originals, you'll get a message that you cannot import transports into Quality during this phase.
If you need to get transports into Quality for break fixes during the Test phase you need to use a Test Message and these are imported during Go-live as well.
Fourth - if the above process works, I will then change the MC to Go Live and schedule the import to Production.
With the corrected process mentioned above, yes, you will then change the phase to Go-live and it will import everything that was brought into Quality.
Hope this helps.

ChaRM for a 5 system landscape

Hi all,
we got a requirement to implement charm for 5 system landscape. but the problem is
currently the scenario followed for the rollout is
1. AA(DEV-proj)--> BB(QUA - proj)
Then the TR is forwarded from BB system to the maintenance landscape
DEV>QUA> PROD
they don't want to implement retrofit functionality.
is there any way we can mapp this scenario to charm.
kindly advice in this regard.
Thanks,
Subhashini.

Hi Ragu,
Thanks for the reply.
currently a two systems are separated from the maintenance landscape.
they are forwarding the TRs to the development system.
is there any way we create 2 tracks.
1. AA-BB-DEV-QUA-PROD
2. DEV-QUA- PROD
again i not having a clear idea on how to differentiate the tracks as both leads to the same production system.
or is there any way develop a custom method for forwarding this TR to the DEV system.
kindly sugggest on how to go about.
Thanks ,
Subhashini.

System Landscape for ESS/MSS in EP60 SP2

I have installed EP60 SP2 on J2EE 6.20 and MSSQL. I have imported business packages ESS 50-4 and MSS 60-1-5. I have created the folder Systems in Portal Content and created a system SAP_R3 with aliases SAP_R3_HumanResources, SAP_R3_Cross, SAP_R3_Travel, and SAP_R3_Financials.
My 4.7 R/3 system is app server R3DEV02.domain.com, system id DEV, sysno 01, client 100. My ITS server is http://itsdev01.domain.com:71/scripts/wgate/webgui/! using client 100. My EP path is http://sapport01.domain.com:50000/irj/.
Given this information, can anyone tell me exactly what parameters I must set in the system landscape for system SAP_R3 and what the values should be for ESS and MSS to work properly? If I go to the System Landscape Cockpit, system SAP_R3 fails all tests.
Any and all help is certainly appreciated.

Hello Gary,
WRT SAP_R3 system landscape test failure, I ran into the same issue earlier, for a SAP_R3_Dedicated system. Keep the same setting values, but leave the system id (DEV) Blank, then test.
Your definition of (Application Server Host Address + System Number) should be sufficient for a SAP_R3_Dedicated connection.
I hope this will resolve your system TEST problem.
Regards,
AAAttar

Transportmanagemt for 2 systems landscape

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for