Transports not automatically released SDMJ

Hi-
I am at the step where I confirm a successful test in my charm scenario. According to the SAP process for normal corrections (sdmj), at this point the status turns to Consolidated and the original transport request gets released automatically. The transport is not being released.
Any thoughts?

There is one possible reason.. check your all transport of copies has been imported or not. . Because once you select "Confirm successful teat" first system change status to "Consolidated" then after trying to release transport. Before releasing actual transport.. system check all transport of copies has been successfully imported in QA or not. If one of request is waiting for import then transport will not be released.  Please check Display/Close message window. Your CR will return status message over there... Hope this will help you to understand.
Thanks
Jignesh

Similar Messages

  • MRBR - Invoice not automatically released

    Hi
    I have the following scenario
    PO raised for qty 1 value 100
    GR completed for qt1 value 100
    Invoice created for qty 1 value 110
    The invoice is automatically blocked which is correct, then a credit note is entered in MIRO for 10.
    Now when I run MRBR with the auto release option the invoice is not unblocked, do you know why this is is the case?
    thanks Joe

    Hi,
    Do refer the below KBA, which explains you why MRBR not released the Invoice with credit memo and corresponding solution.
    KBA: 1781064 - MRBR transaction not releasing payment block on credit memo
    You may also can have a look on below KBA's which may help you..
    1906013 - FI Block can not be released via MRBR
    1790472 - MRBR - Invoices not released Automatically

  • Transport request could not be released

    hi guys,
    im trying to release a request thru se09
    after successfully releasing the task.the request could not be released.
    it gives this error message
    TEST CALL OF TRANSPORT CONTROL PROGRAM (tp) ENDED WITH RETURN CODE 0212.
    <removed_by_moderator>
    Read the "Rules of Engagement"
    Regards Walata
    Edited by: Juan Reyes on Oct 13, 2009 4:40 PM

    hi Mark,these are the results of the actions you specifiedWhen i tried to open the tp system log, this is wat i get"Could not open log file
    wc40-altsapmnt     ranslog"for the checksconnection test"connection to system DEV OK"transport directoryCheck transport directory      14.10.2009  10:36:27           DEV Development System                Transport directory                 bin  
    wc40-altsapmnt     rans in               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file               buffer  
    wc40-altsapmnt     rans uffer               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file               cofiles  
    wc40-altsapmnt     ranscofiles               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file               data  
    wc40-altsapmnt     ransdata               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file               log  
    wc40-altsapmnt     ranslog               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file               sapnames  
    wc40-altsapmnt     ranssapnames               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file               tmp  
    wc40-altsapmnt     rans     mp               Create test file        Read test file        Delete test file    there is a ZIG ZAG arrow in front of each.while for the transport toolunder the tp interfacethe test was ok i.e. a green mark sign was there for all the items in the drop down listunder transport filethe check for path was marked okfor profile "tp profile cannot be read"for version "tp profile has an invalid formatunder RFC destinationthe test was ok i.e. a green mark sign was there for all the items in the drop down listunder tp callRFC and tp version successfulfor DBCONNECT "link to database failedoffline call "could not access file as supposedhow do i get the error information in the tp system log when i cant even view it
    Regards WAlata

  • Automatic Release of Transport Request: By ABAP Program

    Hi Experts,
    I have following scenario:
    I have created one custom table in which entries will be inserted/modifed through one report program by using alv grid list.
    I have one selection screen in which one text box which is used to display the entries from custom table and have one push button: "Transport Release".
    whenever user enters a entry in text box and click on push button, report should pop up and display the request numbers regarding the custom table and once user selects that request, the request automatically releases from that system to other systems.
    Please let me know is there any FMs for pop up the existing requests and release the requests automatically.
    Regards,
    Ramesh.

    [Check if this might help you.|http://logosworld.de/www3/cookbooks/tms/tms60_tips/docu.htm]
    on the push button hit you write code to modify the entry in the database table with a status to release... and hit star popup star in se37 for popup function module.

  • Bill doc could not be released to accounting automatically

    I have a problem on a particular billing type (document category P u2013 debit note) where the billing document could not be released to accounting automatically upon saving. The message VF050 is shown with Document xx saved (no accounting document generated). Subsequent release of the billing document to the accounting manually has no problem and no error was thrown. Looking through the account determination analysis shows that the correct revenue account is determined, so there should be no problem with the account determination setup. The billing type is also not set up with posting block, so it should release to accounting automatically.
             What could be the possible problems or any other areas that I could check to trace the problem?
    kt

    Hi KT
    First of all check in VOFA wheather Posting block has been maintained or not
    Secondly also check wheather Revenue Account determination procedure has been done or not
    Run VFX3 and finally pass it on to FI and while passing it on to FI you can check why the error has occurred
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Released transport not present in QA Worklist

    Hello,
    We have a transport that is "stuck" betwen our DEV and QAS system. The transport has been released, and it is visible in the QAS system import queue in status "waiting for QA approval", but it is not present in the QA Worklist, and cannot be approved. That makes it impossible for us to transport it furhter.
    Has anyone come accrosss a similar problem (and solved it)?
    Thanks,
    A.

    Hi
    First check whether that request has been created as "Local Change request"...if that is the case you cant see the request in import queue of QAS or PRD.
    Secondly, if the request has a target system ( check from SE01 in DEV system), check if you have datafiles and cofiles for that request  in usr/sap/trans/data urs/sap/trans/cofiles directory from Operating system level
    If everything is fine, try to forward the request from DEV system import queue or add the request in the import queue of QAS system manually

  • SolMan Charm: wbch and customizing TR not always automatically released

    Dear solman experts,
    In Charm, when users save a status linked to the background action "release_all" in order to release their transport requests, the transports are not always released.
    I know this could happen with ToC and also with TR (mostly for workbench), but this is happening to lots of customizing transports.
    I tested it with some small configuration (like for instance a TR with roles in it), the release works fine.
    So the configuration of solman seems ok.
    Does anyone have already faced the same issue and has an idea on what to do in order to avoid this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    Kr,
    Alice

    Hello Khalil,
    In the maintenance cycle, the ongoing phase is "development with release" so it is ok.
    Also, all tasks have already been released as one of the previous status/action triggered the creation of a ToC (and for that the check of all released tasks is performed). So we have like two testing cycle (a first one with ToC where all tasks are already released) and if it is ok you can then set a status which triggers the "release_all" action to release the orginial transport requests.
    What is really strange is that in the tasklist, the release request activity is correctly launched  but has an error " /TMWFLOW/TRANSPORT_N643" which says that :
    - Diagnosis --> The request BRDK922172 has already been released (but it is not the case)
    - System Response --> The system does not allow you to create a transport of copies. (but it is not the action concerned here "the activity on which I receive this error is "release_all""
    - Procedure--> It is not usually necessary to create a transport of copies for a request that has already been released.Perhaps you entered an incorrect request, in which case you have to enter a different one.
    I do not get what is this error message about. And what is really strange is that for some transport requests the release works and for other not (but more and more are not working)
    Have you an idea?
    Thanks a lot for your help,
    Alice

  • Transport request not getting released

    Hello Friends,
    I am unable to release a transport request.
    While releasing a transport request, it shows the following log in SE10. The export is not taking place.
    ========================================
    Log Overview for DBBK911964
    DBBK911964 All cubes
    DBB Development (Maintenance Line)
    Checks at Operating System Level
    20.08.2007 13:30:58 (0) Successfully Completed
    Export pre-processing
    20.08.2007 13:31:01 (0) Successfully Completed
    <b>Export
    21.08.2007 07:51:11 In process: Requires update</b>
    Import steps not specific to transport request
    ========================================
    Kindly sugest what should be done.
    Thanks & regards,
    Kunal Patel.

    Hi!
    Child transport = (transport) task, parent transport = (transport) request.
    Releasing the task (child) does not trigger any checks, the locks are just copied from the task to the request (parent).
    Only when releasing a request checks are triggered (can be done beforehand via menu in SE09). Also this steps (would) copy the source into files, which are later imported in the target systems.
    You have problems in one package (DEVC) and three reports, obviously because of Japanese characters. The possibility to print Japanese seems not to include to name objects in Japanese...
    Your objects are ZA11 and 1021-1022 - here no Japanese is include, so it has to be something on lower levels.
    Check the code and try English naming.
    Regards,
    Christian

  • Transport request not getting released by se10

    Dear all,
    I am trying to release transport request of development server via. transaction se10.Now my problem is that the child(DEVELOPMENT/CORRECTION) is getting released while the parent request is not getting released.
    I checked everything and its showing 'test call of transport control program ended with return code 0208.' I even checked overview of system,overview of connection type,over view of transport protocol and they are fine.my only doubt is after going to se10 when I click transport proposals its showing "WORK FLOW NOT ACTIVE' .
    Is my problem is because of this. Please help its very urgent as due to this I am not even able to transport any request on production server.
    Helpful contribution will be duly rewarded.
    Thanks & Regards,
    VICKY

    Are you the owner and in the right  client ?
    use SWU3 to activate/configure WORKFLOW.

  • Applets and memory not being released by Java Plug-in

    Hi.
    I am experiencing a strange memory-management behavior of the Java Plug-in with Java Applets. The Java Plug-in seems not to release memory allocated for non-static member variables of the applet-derived class upon destroy() of the applet itself.
    I have built a simple "TestMemory" applet, which allocates a 55-megabytes byte array upon init(). The byte array is a non-static member of the applet-derived class. With the standard Java Plug In configuration (64 MB of max JVM heap space), this applet executes correctly the first time, but it throws an OutOfMemoryException when pressing the "Reload / Refresh" browser button or if pressing the "Back" and then the "Forward" browser buttons. In my opionion, this is not an expected behavior. When the applet is destroyed, the non-static byte array member should be automatically invalidated and recollected. Isn't it?
    Here is the complete applet code:
    // ===================================================
    import java.awt.*;
    import javax.swing.*;
    public class TestMemory extends JApplet
      private JLabel label = null;
      private byte[] testArray = null;
      // Construct the applet
      public TestMemory()
      // Initialize the applet
      public void init()
        try
          // Initialize the applet's GUI
          guiInit();
          // Instantiate a 55 MB array
          // WARNING: with the standard Java Plug-in configuration (i.e., 64 MB of
          // max JVM heap space) the following line of code runs fine the FIRST time the
          // applet is executed. Then, if I press the "Back" button on the web browser,
          // then press "Forward", an OutOfMemoryException is thrown. The same result
          // is obtained by pressing the "Reload / Refresh" browser button.
          // NOTE: the OutOfMemoryException is not thrown if I add "testArray = null;"
          // to the destroy() applet method.
          testArray = new byte[55 * 1024 * 1024];
          // Do something on the array...
          for (int i = 0; i < testArray.length; i++)
            testArray[i] = 1;
          System.out.println("Test Array Initialized!");
        catch (Exception e)
          e.printStackTrace();
      // Component initialization
      private void guiInit() throws Exception
        setSize(new Dimension(400, 300));
        getContentPane().setLayout(new BorderLayout());
        label = new JLabel("Test Memory Applet");
        getContentPane().add(label, BorderLayout.CENTER);
      // Start the applet
      public void start()
        // Do nothing
      // Stop the applet
      public void stop()
        // Do nothing
      // Destroy the applet
      public void destroy()
        // If the line below is uncommented, the OutOfMemoryException is NOT thrown
        // testArray = null;
      //Get Applet information
      public String getAppletInfo()
        return "Test Memory Applet";
    // ===================================================Everything works fine if I set the byte array to "null" upon destroy(), but does this mean that I have to manually set to null all applet's member variables upon destroy()? I believe this should not be a requirement for non-static members...
    I am able to reproduce this problem on the following PC configurations:
    * Windows XP, both JRE v1.6.0 and JRE v1.5.0_11, both with MSIE and with Firefox
    * Linux (Sun Java Desktop), JRE v1.6.0, Mozilla browser
    * Mac OS X v10.4, JRE v1.5.0_06, Safari browser
    Your comments would be really appreciated.
    Thank you in advance for your feedback.
    Regards,
    Marco.

    Hi Marco,
    my guess as to why JPI would keep references around, if it does keep them, is that it propably is an implementation side effect. A lot of things are cached in the name of performance and it is easy to leave things laying around in your cache. Maybe the page with the associated images/applets is kept in the browser cache untill the browser needs some memory and if the browser memory manager is not co-operating with the JPI/JVM memory manager the browser is not out of memory, thus not releasing its caches but the JVM may be out of memory. Thus the browser indirectly keeps the reference that it realy does not need. This reference could be inderect through some 'applet context' or what ever the browser uses to interact with JPI, don't realy know any of these details, just imaging what must/could be going on there. Browser are amazingly complicated beast.
    This behaviour that you are observing, weather the origin is something like I speculated or not, is not nice but I would not expect it to be fixed even if you filed a bug report. I guess we are left with relleasing all significatn memory structures in destroy. A simple way to code this is not to store anything in the member fields of the applet but in a separate class; then one has to do is to null that one reference from the applet to that class in the destroy method and everything will be relased when necessary. This way it is not easy to forget to release things.
    Hey, here is a simple, imaginary, way in which the browser could cause this problem:
    The browser, of course needs a reference to the applet, call it m_Applet here. Presume the following helper function:
    Applet instantiateAndInit(Class appletClass) {
    Applet applet=appletClass.newInstance();
    applet.init();
    return applet;
    When the browser sees the applet tag it instantiates and inits the new applet as follows:
    m_Applet=instantiateAndInit(appletClass);
    As you can readily see, the second time the instantiation occurs, the m_Applet holds the reference to the old applet until after the new instance is created and initlized. This would not cause a memory leak but would require that twice the memory needed by the applet would be required to prevent OutOfMemory.I guess it is not fair to call this sort of thing a bug but it is questionable design.In real life this is propably not this blatant, but could happen You could try, if you like, by allocating less than 32 Megs in your init. If you then do not run out of memory it is an indication that there are at most two instances of your applet around and thus it could well be someting like I've speculated here.
    br Kusti

  • CO01 - automatic release

    Hello,
    When I create a new PO with CO01, I have to release manually each PO with CTRL-F1.
    I know there is a way to perform an automatic release during the creation of the PO (it worked on our previous system).
    Could you please let me know how I can fix the automatic release?
    Thank you very much for your help.
    Best regards.
    François.

    Hi François,
    The setting for automatic release is maintained in prod scheduling profile as told by our members.
    This production scheduling profile can be ,
    1. Assigned to a production scheduler (transaction OPJ9)
    2. Assigned in the work scheduling profile (material master)
    In your case if production schd profile is not maintained in the material master, then the one assigned to the prodn scheduler will be used & this prod schd profile should have tick mark in the automatic release check box
    Also if prod sched profile is maintained both in OPJ9 & material master then the profile assigned to the material master will be considered. i.e. Higher priority for the profile in material master.
    Let us know if you have any questions.
    Regards,
    Senthilkumar

  • Automatic release of network activities

    We are currently completing the configuration/implementation of the
    Project System module.
    We want SAP to automatically release the following network activities
    upon final confirmation of an activity.
    As an example, letu2019s say we have a simple network of 3 activities:
    Activity 10 (Predecessor of activity 30, type of relationship
    is FS with activity 30)
    Activity 20 (Also predecessor of activity 30, type of
    relationship is FS with activity 30)
    Activity 30 (Successor of activities 10 and 20u2026therefore,
    activities 10 and 20 are predecessors of activity 30)
    Based on these relationships, before activity 30 may begin (or may be
    released), both activities 10 and 20 must have been completed.
    If a u201Cfinal confirmationu201D is set on activity 10, we want SAP to
    automatically set the u201Creleaseu201D status on activity 30 if, and only if
    activity 20 is also final confirmed.
    We are trying to accomplish this using the milestone function
    If we put a milestone on activity 10u2026
    In the milestone, we:
    Set the u201Cfunctionsu201D indicator
    Select the function u201C Release following activitiesu201D
    Enter the status CNF for confirmed in the u201CSyst.STS u201Cfield.
    Set the u201CChange statusu201D indicator to +
    Letu2019s say we now have the following statuses on the network activities:
    Activity 10 = REL
    Activity 20 = REL
    Activity 30 = CRTD
    Then, if we final confirm (status CNF) on activity 10, SAP triggers the
    milestone function and release activity 30, even if activity 20 is not
    confirmed yet!!!
    After final confirmation of activity 10, the statuses on the network
    activities are:
    Activity 10 = CNF
    Activity 20 = REL
    Activity 30 = REL
    Why is it releasing activity 30, even if activity 20 is not confirmed?
    Activity 20 must be completed also before activity 30 may be
    released!!??
    Therefore, in this situation described, when the milestone on activity
    10 was triggered by the final confirmation of activity 10, activity 30
    should not have been released.
    Activity 30 should be released only when activity 10 and 20 would have
    the status CNF.
    What am I missing?
    How can I setup the milestone so it reacts properly, taking into
    account the relationships between the activities?
    I look forward to your inputs.
    Thanks
    Frederick

    Hello Frederick,
    unfortunately scenario described will not work. I. e. milestone function does not consider status of the other activity and will release the directly linked activity.
    One may check whether required logic can be implmenented in customer exit CNEX0028 (not CNEX0029).
    As an alternative one may try to implement the logic in a substitution exit to trigger status change via ABAP internal function calls. However this requires a deep understanding of ABAP and of PS code.
    Kind regards
    Peter
    Edited by: Peter Kratz  on Apr 22, 2009 2:46 PM

  • Automatic release of blocked Invoices

    Note - Posted this qns in Financial forum & the user suggested to post the same question in this forum.
    Hi All,
    Scenario - A PO is placed with GR based IV unchecked. The vendor is sending the material & invoice to us. But the material is to arrive from overseas & hence there is a delay, but in the meantime i have posted the invoice in the system & the system blocks this invoice. I can check the blocked invoices in MRBR. At the moment to release it, i would have to use transaction MRBR, but I would like to know is there anyway, that the system can be configured to automatically release this blocked invoice, once the GR for that material is done, without me having to use any t-code?
    Vivek

    Hi Steve,
       There are 3 blocking reasons in MRBR,
    1. Blocked due to variances
    2. Manual Payment Block
    3. Stochastically blocked
       In this case, what is the reason for blocking?. If it is reason 1, then if i schedule a MRBR with automatic release, then would it release all those invoices as well which have been blocked due to price variation? or would it only release those Invoices which have been blocked due to non-receipt of GR?
       Also would like to know, is there anything in customizing, where i can define, say if the Purchase Order has got a Shipping Notification control key entered, then release this invoice?
       In customizing Financial Accouting -> Accounts Receivable & Accnts Payable -> Business Transaction -> Release payment
        Would this be of any help to me for resolving the issue at hand?
    Vivek

  • Cancellation Billing doc not getting released to accounting

    The original Billing document has been cancelled. But the accounting
    document of the cancellation document has not been generated.
    We are getting the error " Automatic clearing of billing document
    90318566 and canc. doc. 7651735 not poss.Message no. VF208". We are in
    ECC 6.0.
    This error has come for the first time. what needs to be done ?.
    thanks
    amit

    we are not maintaning this doc type , S1 in OBA7.
    we have a z table , which is :
      VKORG WERKS FKART NUMKI KTGRD
      MSI         S1    66    10
      MSI         ZAMC  53    10
      MSI         ZBCM  53    10
      MSI         ZBCO  53    10
      MSI         ZBFB  53    10
      MSI         ZBPR  53    10
      MSI   DALS  S1    66    10
      MSI   DALS  ZBCO  53    10
      MSI   DALS  ZBFB  53    10
    It has been working since many years. Why this is not getting released, not able to get any clue ..

  • Block is not automatically Removed

    Dear All ,
    The system does not automatically remove the blocking reason I, if an acceptance decision is made for the inspection lot concerned. the blocking reason I must be removed in the invoice inspection/invoice release function.
    Release of invoice block u2013 can it be automated from the IL release process ?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Deepu.

    Use MRBR for release, you can schedule a job run for this program to run every night if required.
    Regards,
    Vivek

Maybe you are looking for