Trasporting Issues-Vendor Evaluation

Hi All
We had configured  in our 450 client on  the following SPRO Path
SPRO->MM->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation->Define Pur-Org for  vendor
evaluation . In this , first assigned Purchaase Organization and
subsequently  assigned Main criteria and sub-criteria under the Newly
assigned Pur-Organization.
After doing the above , we have moved the CR to our QA client . No error was occured for the CR, but unfortunately same is not visibile in QA server. Would requets to kindly help us to address this issue
regards
George

yes I did,
rgds
George

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation - Issue

    Good afternoon!
    I need your help to resolve a claim made by the user.
    The user uses the 0PUR_C05_Q0003 report. In the same vendor evaluation displayed for a given period.
    The user is requesting that vendors are not displayed in R / 3, have the flag for deletion.
    I am currently using the DS 0MM_PUR_VE_01.
    The DS gets data from tables and ELBP, ELBK. Information for deletion flag is not displayed in these tables.
    Could you help me find a solution to the problem?
    Thank you very much.
    Javier .-

    anybody?

  • Vendor evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE

    We require Vendor Evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE which has information about receipt(GRPO) perfomance against purchase order issued.  We require item code, item description, p.o.no., p.o.qty, delivery date, GRPO NO., GRPO Date, GRPO QTY, Delay no. of days. If there is any report in SAP please inform us. Otherwise any query we can make please inform us how to make query in SAP business one.

    Hi,
    The query from the thread is modified as below to include the customer/vendor name :
    SELECT T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode, SUM(T0.Quantity) 'PO Qty',SUM(T1.Quantity) 'GRPO Qty', SUM(T2.Quantity) 'Return Qty'
    FROM dbo.POR1 T0
    LEFT JOIN dbo.PDN1 T1
    ON T0.DocEntry = T1.BaseEntry AND T0.LineNum = T1.BaseLine
    LEFT JOIN dbo.RPD1 T2
    ON T1.DocEntry = T2.BaseEntry AND T1.LineNum = T2.BaseLine
    INNER JOIN dbo.OPDN T3
    ON T1.DocEntry = T3.docentry
    WHERE T0.ItemCode is not NULL AND T0.DocDate >= [%0] AND T0.DocDate <= [%1]
    GROUP BY T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode
    Check if this helps.
    Please make sure you have a look on the Query Generator and the related books on the SQL query writing before you start creating your own.
    Kind Regards,
    Jitin
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • Confirmation date in vendor evaluation

    Hi Gurus,
                   Can you please let me know the settings to be maintained to get a score for the sub criteria Adherence to confirmation date during vendor evaluations.
    I've already maintained the purchasing org config settings like weighting and point scores for the automatic criteria.
    But when I run a vendor evaluation there is no score coming out for the sub-criteria Adherence to confirmation date.
    I'm using the confirmation control key One day acknowledge and confirmation category AB (Order acknowledge). Please let me know if anything is missing out
    Regards,
    Ashwin.

    Ashwin
    Our company has the same issue, did you find a solution to this problem?
    Thanks
    Brad

  • Vendor Evaluation(2LIS_02_S013)

    Hello Friends
    i have  issue with 2lis_02_s013 vendor evaluation . issue is when i do full upload for  this data source i can retrive around 12000 records and when i try to do intial upload the system gives me error
    LIS updating is still activated (client 200 )M+     25     
    Errors in source system     RSM     340     
    so i am unable to intial load so i did intial load without any datatransfer . it works fine . it has transfered only one record . but when i do the delta upload it does not extarct any data it shows 0/0 records but the staus is green . when i see the details tab Processing (data packet): No data .i have already activated delta in the lbw1 . there i find only two options one asynchronous and noupdating i have selected . asynchronus. here do i need to fill any setup sepatretely for delta . so how can we delete the setup tables for 'S'types data sources. is that same as lbwq. plz let me know what need to be done inorder to fill the cube with delta upload . look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
    Thankyou

    Kumar,
         Fill up the setup tables for that extractor. Because the LO extraction only eorks on the the setup tables. And the setup tables are used when you do the delta.
    Go to SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures ->
    Initilization -> Delete the setup tables. Select your extractor and delete the setup tables for it..And...
    SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures -> Initilization -> Filling setup tables. Fill the corresponding setup tables for vendor evaluation.
    Try checking the data in RSA3.
    Hope this helps.....

  • Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

    Dear all,
    I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
    For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
    Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
    Vendor XYZ
    Material ABC
    For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
    For 2010 Maket price 8.2  Effective price 8.5
    Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
    Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
    Vendor XYZ
    Material DEF
    For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
    For 2010 Maket price 20  Effective price 22
    Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
    When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
    5     Price behavior     5.0     10
    5     Price behavior     10.0     15
    5     Price behavior     20.0     20
    5     Price behavior     50.0     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0     10
    5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
    5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
    5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
    Pls help me resolve the issue
    Regards.
    Milind Dugade

    Hi Siva,
    [Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Naveen Dasari
    Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

  • Equal weighting  AND   Unequal weighting  in Vendor Evaluation ?

    Hi Experts,
    Can u pls explain me this small issue with Vendor Evaluation weighting
    SPRO -  IMG - MM  -  PURCHASING -  VENDOR EVALUATION  -  Maintain Purchasing Organization Data - SELECT PURCH .ORG -
    DOUBLE CLICK ON Weighting -  THERE IS I AM SEEING THIS LIST BELOW  -  Equal weighting  AND   Unequal weighting
    REPETING. my client wants  vendor evaluation   Unequal . so i have to delet the  Equal weighting  5 line or what to do ?
    can u pls explain me.
    01 Equal weighting 01 Price 1
    01 Equal weighting 02 Quality 1
    01 Equal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 1
    01 Equal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
    01 Equal weighting 05 servicio 1
    02 Unequal weighting 01 Price 1
    02 Unequal weighting 02 Quality 1
    02 Unequal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 2
    02 Unequal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
    02 Unequal weighting 05 servicio 1
    Thanksin Advance,
    Anthyodaya.

    Hi Priyanka,
    thank you for the reply . but finalley my question is
    my client wants  Unequal weighting  .
    so i have to delete that  Equal weighting lines or not .?
    i mean  line of below list  .which is in BOLD letters. ?
    01 Equal weighting 01 Price 1
    01 Equal weighting 02 Quality 1
    01 Equal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 1
    01 Equal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
    01 Equal weighting 05 servicio 1
    02 Unequal weighting 01 Price 1
    02 Unequal weighting 02 Quality 1
    02 Unequal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 2
    02 Unequal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
    02 Unequal weighting 05 servicio 1
    can u pls explain me.
    Thanksin Advance,
    Anthyodaya.

  • Mass Maintain weighting key for vendor evaluation.?

    Hi experts
    Can anybody give some inputs for below issue
    1.How to maintain weighting key for vendors .
    2.How to maintain weighting key for all vendors in mass .(Mass maintainence)
    3.How to get the report of vendor ranking list duration wise (Month, year..etc).
    Regards
    MM group

    weighting keys is customizing, and this is certainly not by vendor.
    you define one weighting key  and then you run vendor evaluation using this weighting key.

  • QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

    Hi All,
    I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.
    Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.
    And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.
    Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries
    1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?
    2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?
    I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK
    Thanks

    In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module
    see below
    Complaints/Rejection Level
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
    The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

  • Vendor evaluation Pricing error: Field overflow

    Hi All,
    I scheduled monthly batch job for vendor evaluation, unfortunately i'm getting Pricing error: Field overflow with Message no. V1802
    Ofcourse pricing is one of the criteria for my vendor evaluation, my worry is that this evaluation is being carried out for all the vendors in more than 25 POrg's.
    Can you please guide me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Pavan

    Hi Arminda:
    yes i'm getting same error "price error: field overflow" even now
    Jürgen:
    yes i am running batch job for this vendor evaluation process with the variant, my problem is that " Batch job is getting cancelled due to few errors in vendor evaluation process called 'price error: field overflow'..
    can you please any one of you tell me how to get ride of this error.
    thanks
    Pavan

  • Purchasing Vendor Evaluation

    Please help me by providing the business content datasources that provides me the bewlow information.
    From which extractor , I can get the vendor evaluation score based for Invoices .?
    the criteria we are concerned with for vendor evaluations are as follows:
    · Delivery
    o On-Time Delivery (Statistical GR Date vs. Actual GR Date)
    o Quantity Reliability (Qty to be shipped on PO vs. Qty actually received)
    · Invoice

    thank you for your help, I need this information on schedule line level. I have looked at the datasource 2lis_02_scl and this datsource does not have PO order qty or Delivery Level Information.
    I can enhance the datasource to add these keyfigures but my concern is how to handle the delta. If the quantity is changed by itself and this will not be picked by the delta.
    Can you provide some solution to handle the delta issue.
    Regards,
    Raghu Reddy

  • Vendor Evaluation DS: 0MM_PUR_VE_01

    Hi All,
    I got an issue while loading the data in MM for Vendor Evaluation Data cube 0PUR_C05 through the data source 0MM_PUR_VE_01. iam geting an error that there is no data, i have checked in RSA3 in ECC there also it was showing 0 records. i have executed the setup run for the purchasing and inventory, even then also data was not there. i have checked in the LO customizing cockpit there this data source is not there in relevent nodes.
    where shall i need to check for the data population and how to get the data to this data source. please give me some inputs which can be helpful.
    Thanks & Regards
    Prabhakar

    Hi...
    YES. The extractor will fetch the data automatically from FM when ever it is triggered.
    One more thing:
    Have you activated the Update for this data source before executing SetUp. Otherwise SetUp will not be executed.
    To Activate the Extract Sturcture Update for the data source
    0MM_PUR_VE_01 :
    Go to LBWE Tcode select the Data Source and Activate the Extract Structure Update if it is INACTIVE.
    Then Goto OLI2BW and Run the setup.
    Check the data in RSA3.
    Hope this helps u. Let me know.

  • Vendor Evaluation data in tables ELBM and ELBP

    Hello,
    Please can someone provide some direction for this issue we have with MM Vendor Evaluation in ECC5.0.
    Basically, I have set up SAP standard Vend Evaluation config for our companies Purchase Orgs in SPRO, however, tables ELBM, and ELBP are not storing any values. The config that I have maintained includes:
    -     Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J : set to equal weightings
    -     Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G: left as standard
    -     Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M: left as standard
    -     Define Purchasing Organization data: left as standard but no Subcriterion maintained. Weightings set as equal weightings. Points scores also left as standard/
    Any ideas?
    Thank you.
    Dave
    FL,USA.

    Once you do all the config than you have to use ME61 than use ME6H transaction.

  • Vendor evaluation delivery subcriteria's calculation verification - reg

    Dear Experts,
    In display vendor evaluation & Standard analysis we get to know the quantity reliability, on time delivery criterias individual scores but can anyone plz guide the tcode to verify the score calculation for delivery and quality criterias. Ontime delivery and quantity reliabiltiy verification mc$6, mc$8 respective tcodes values not satisfactory to us for analysis.
    (We have analyzed the Price criteria - "price level" factors by comparing info record/PO price history and effective price of vendors).
    Simillarly plz guide how to confirm scores that are getting calculated is correct or not for
    delivery criterias - quantity reliabililty, on time delivery.
    Plz solve this issue.
    full rewards assured.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Viju.

    Hi,
    I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Vendor evaluation - Quantity Score for Service Items

    Hi experts,
    Vendor Evaluation is active in our client system.
    There are both material and service vendors for score evaluation.
    One of the service vendors is having a Quantity Reliability (Delivery criteria) score of 100.
    Only services (item cat SERVICE) is procured from this vendor.
    The On-Time Delivery performance score is 0 (not calculated).
    Why is Quantity Reliability set to 100 if all material documents are related to service items?
    Anybody face such issue before?
    Plz provide your inputs..thanks!

    Hi.
    You need to configure Output type NAHN (Dunning).  Define condition records. Follow the same steps as you configure PO output type NEU.
    Make sure the 1st/2nd/3rd reminder days are maintained n PIR.
    These days are displayed in Delivery Tab of the PO.
    If the above output type is determined, then a standard SAP batch job automaticall ryns  ME9F to send reminders /expeditors to the vendor. You dont have to do any other config for this
    regards,
    Shashidar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Anybody else not a Verizon customer getting nowhere w/Verizon identity theft unit

    I am not a Verizon Wireless customer.  I was, but I changed over in 2011 because the coverage with another carrier was better than where we previously lived for 17 years.  We are middle aged, fiscally very conservative and sound, and expected no prob

  • SAP CRM Navigate from custom search page to email component

    Hello Experts, I implemented my own search page and added a link on every row of the returned query that should direct me to the email component eg. CRMCMP_CCS_EMLV. I did something similar with Business partners and Task and it works. For BPs and ta

  • K9N6PGM2 Higher Resolution Display Modes not Available

    Hello, I've updated a computer with a K9N6PGM2, NVIDIA GeFORCE MCP61P + Nforce 430 chipset, motherboard and am having problems with video modes. Via the control panel window: Dell 1701FP (analog) on nVidia GeForce 6150SE nForce430 BIOS 5.61.32.25.15

  • Bussiness area change

    Hi All, We have asset master without business area and depreciation is carried out. But the asset master needed to assign with business area and depreciation is carried out now. We enable the business area fin. reporting in OBY6. The assets have now

  • T-code kbk6 (actual posting price)  error " Layout 1-N01 does not exist. "

    i tried to see t-code kbk6   (actual posting - actual price) it's have error Layout 1-N01 does not exist. full error message i show you below. how should i do.  i tried to create 1-N01 in KP65 (create planning layouts for cost element planning) i got