Triggering Purchase requirment in IS-OIL scenario..

Hi
If the stock is reduced below re-order point/safety stock at a storage location / tank. In IS-oil whether the system creates purchaser requisition automatically with ref to purchase contract? Or it will be created manually by the planner?? Is there any setting/routine using which we can trigger automatically?
Thanks
S.Senthil

Hi Susana,
When you say you want to simulate formula pricing, i assume you meant Differential pricing after prov invoice is done. For that, you can make use of Pro-Forma invoice. Create a Z-program which will create proforma invoices for all you deliveries for which differential is not done. You can also run a BDC for the same.
Hope it answers your query.
Vikram

Similar Messages

Purchase required Quantity Table

What is the table field to get the purchase required qunatity

I don't know what they mean by Purchase Req Qty, to me, the required qty is the qty being ordered. Check with your functional lead, and have them point on this field in a standard transaction, then you can go from there.
Regards
Rich Heilman

Determination of Excise value in Oil scenario

Hi All,
We are in the project of IS OIL industry.
We are not able to determine the excise value in the Sales document while doing the sales in OIL scenario.
Please help on some lights.
Thanks,
SK

Check all the entries & settings in your J1ID for the relavant material- chapter ID combination.
& revert , if still problem exists.

Required SAP IS OIL Material

Hi Friends
I require SAP IS OIL Material , Please help me in gettinbg the Material For TSW & TD.
Thanks & Regards
Tarakaram

Check this link
[mySAP Oil&Gas|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_oil46csp2/helpdata/en/67/bfa73ad9ccf101e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm]
thanksA
G. Lakshmipathi

How is Idoc MBGMCR triggered/Configured in SRM Extended classic scenario

Hello All,
In the existing scenario, when confirmation is created in SUS portal, corresponding confirmation gets created in EBP .
Once the confirmation in EBP gets approved ,we want corresponding confirmation creation in backend system (ECC) .
I thought of using the standard idoc of basic type MBGMCR01 and message type MBGMCR for the above requirement.
But I am unable to find how to configure the triggering of idoc MBGMCR during creation of confirmation in EBP.
If anybody has an idea of message control method in SRM or how is idoc MBGMCR gets triggered, please let me know.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Anuradha,
You would require to set up distribution model , tcode - BD64
SAP NetWeaver ->Application Server ->IDOC Interface / Application Link Enabling (ALE) -> Modeling and Implementing Business Processes ->Master Data Distribution ->Distribution Using Object Classes ->Model Distribution Using Classes.
Once the distribution model is set up you can assign the message type MBGMCR.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Ashish

Refresher: Apple in-app purchase requirement

Hey, Guys,
Digging through all the routine documentation and can't seem to find Apple's requirement (been a while since we've dealt with this particular topic).
Scenario: A client is aiming to launch a new magazine app in the Newsstand. They'll have at least one auto-renewable subscription (assume 1-yr) set up in iTunes Connect, as well as future in-app purchases.
What We Know: To be in Newsstand, we know that Apple requires at least one free issue/folio be available to the consumer.
What We Can't Find:
1.) Will Apple approve an app that has only ONE free issue and NO paid issues available at launch?
OR
2.) Does Apple require a mininum of two issues at launch — ONE paid and ONE free?
Clearly, the latter would be ideal, so that when users purchase a subscription, they can see the status of the "$x.xx" folio turn to "Free". However, client wants to know if Apple will approve the former.
Thanks in advance.
Josh

Josh,
I know that Apple WILL approve an app that has a free issue and no paid issues at launch (my company did so in June).
I know that previously Apple has stated that a free issue is required for Newsstand, but I have heard multiple accounts that it is either no longer required or not being enforced. I have yet to find documentation on this though.
Even if it isn't required, I like having some kind of free edition available so that users can see your magazine before they purchase it. Even if it's only a few articles, the gesture is appricated by users. So I would submit the app with the free edition and the in-app purchase requests for the subscription and the first single edition at the same time so that as soon as the app and the in-app purchases are approved, you can activate the paid edition from the DPS dashboard.
Good luck
-Scott

Any Badi required for service procurement scenario?

Dear Guru's
I am configuring the service procurement classic scenario in SRM 7.01. Our requirement is as below:
If the service requisition has backend contract available as a source of supply, it will create a purchase order in the backend ERP system.
However, when it comes to contract, service hierarchy is supported in the srm contract as well. So, unlike srm 7.0, we can create follow-on contract with service hierarchy both in SAP SRM system and backend ERP system. How the system will decide whether to create the contract in the backend system or local SRM system?
If I want to create local contract only from the purchase requisitions with service hierarchy, do I need to take help of the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'? Or i Need the BAdi only if I need to create the contract directly in the backend system.
Secondly, Will the local contract be available as a source of supply in the sourcing cockpit or only the backend contract will be available as a sourcing?
Thanks in advance,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Dear Ricardo,
Thanks for the confirmation. Till SRM 7.0, service hierarchy was not supported in the contract document in SRM. The system behaviour is to create contract with service hierarchy in the backend system. In case of multiple backend systems, we need to use the BAdi 'BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS'.
Since we are in the SRM 7.01 where the central contract supports service hierarchy, we are proceeding with the approach suggested by you.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Conceptual advice required for file receiver scenario

Hi,
My scenario is to read 3 sets of data from SAP ERP and write files on the receiver system, one per data set.
I could create 3 service interfaces and set up Integration Builder configuration for each one but this seems messy.
Alternatively, if I create one service interface with 3 operations to group them, it is not possible to create the required files unless I add mapping and use dynamic configuration to determine the filename from the payload and set this in the receiver communication channel.
It seems to me that I would have benefited from the ability to define a rule in the receiver determination to define a different communication channel per operation where the specific filename could be specified.
It is only possible to bind a service interface to one communication channel in the receiver agreement.
What would you recommend as the cleanest and best approach to meet this requirement - 1 or 3 service interfaces, use of mapping or are there any alternatives?
Thanks in advance.
Alan
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 4, 2011 7:02 PM
Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 4, 2011 7:02 PM

Basically your requirement is many to many mapping. Please decide based on the sender system requirement. If your sender system sends different message structure then you can break into three diff interfaces and keep the interface simple.
You can route to three diff recievers based on the condition setting in the receiver determination or you can do in the mapping too. That is not the whole point. you need to think about how do pick the three different interfaces. You might also consider using ccbpm for this.
Refer the pattern that comes in the PI standard installation under SAP BASIS SWCV.
BPMPatternSerializeMultipleTrigger or BPMPatternSerializeOneTrigger

Purchase Order Response in Classic Scenario

Hi Experts,
Implementation Scenario- CLASSIC
SRM Server - 5.0
Question-
1) Within Classic Scenario, is it possible for to create Purchase Order Response in SRM for a PO which is already created in backend? This PO is generated by a shopping cart in SRM.
Best Regards,
Amit

Hi Amit,
You can create POR for a PO which is already created in backend, no matter if its created with reference to SC in SRM. This POR would be done by the supplier in SUS scenario.
It possible in both, classic and ECS scenario's.
Regards,
Prashant

Purchase Order Creation, Extended Classic Scenario

Can someone please explain the different databse tables affected during the creation of a Purchase Order.
Also, is there a transaction with which we can create PO in Extended classic scenario?

hi,
below are the tables effected while creation of PO:
CRMD_ORDERADM_H
CRMD_ORDERADM_I
BBP_PDIGP
BBP_PDBEI
BBP_PDISB
BBP_PDISS
BBP_PDSDLN
BBP_PDACC
BBP_PDTAX
BBP_PDATT
BBP_PDORG
BBP_PDWGT
BBP_PDDYN
BBP_PDEXR
PRCD_ITEM
PRCD_COND
PRCD_COND
BBP_PDDEP
CRMD_PARTNER
as far as your second question is concerned normally we will be creating a PO in SRM/EBP in web browser and it will replicate to the backend ERP.
regards
IGA

Purchase Order in Stand Alone Scenario

Hi experts
i'd like to know if is possible to create a Purchase Order in SRM 5.0 (stand alone scenario) with position "Limit".
I'd like also to know if is possible to create Purchase Orders with 2 or more lines.
I'm sure that is possible to creat Shopping Cart with position "Limit".
Regards
Andrea

Hi Olga,
Are you creating RFQ from scratch or from Sourcing Cockpit ?
If from SOCO, the Bid data can be completed with originating SC data. Otherwise data needs to be completed.
Have a look at "processing bids" part of bidding engine help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d3/133dcd5641b244a60578baa996a597/content.htm
It is stated that in case of contract creation, you have to complete the "user-defined" contract item to add data, for example product or vendor product number.
For PO creation, there is nothing about "user-defined" items.
I analyzed this process in an SRM 5.0, and it looks correct: added items are passed to the PO.
For local PO creation, all the logic is done in BBP_QUOTE_PO_CREATE.
Here are steps for SRM 5.0
- read quote details (items and additional items)
- read RFQ details
- retrieve RFQ long texts
- fill PO header and complete it with ACS & BUK attributes of connected user
- merge normal & supplier added items (GOOD !!!!!)
- process items
- complete partners
- process texts
- process attachments
- BADI to determine purch group
- create the PO with BBP_PD_PO_CREATE
So it should work.
Debug this process starting with function BBP_QUOTE_PO_CREATE, or open an OSS message.
Rgds
Christophe

Sugestion required for Fiscal Year scenario

Hi Gurus,
I need your suggestion for the below scenario
One of our client going to change the Fiscal period from (Jan - dec ) to (Sep - Oct). We have nearly 5 years of records as on date based on the (Jan-Dec) fiscal period.
Requirement: If new fiscal peirod will come in active , they want to view all the data ( Including historical records)based on the both the fiscal period based on the selection in the query.
Technical requirement: Dynamic switching is requried for Fiscal Year Variant in the query level.
Suggestion Required for below point:
1. Is it required to maintain two Fiscal year variant ?
2.How do we maintain the new fiscal year period for historical record ?
3. Is it any posibilities their with out major disturbance of the existing query ?
4. Is it possible to do in query level with minor impact of performance ?
5. Is it possible to do in back end side with out redundancy of the records ?
6.I have a solution to use multiprovider on top of two infoprovides which are maintain the fiscal period based on two fiscal year variant. If I realize this it would lead major back end work.
7. I have another solution to add another two fields in the existing structure to hold new variant and fiscal period. If I do this How dynamically I can change the structure of the query for to view the different fiscal period information.
Anticipate your reply eagerly
With Regards
Siva

Hi,
1. Is it required to maintain two Fiscal year variant ?
Yes, You will need to have another Fiscal Year variant for Sep to Oct.
2.How do we maintain the new fiscal year period for historical record ?
To do this at the BI Level, You can have a routine to convert the Fiscal Year Period according to the new Variant.
You will have to get the help of a functional consultant in order to understand the logic of opening and closing balance. According to the new variant the current Fisc Period 009.2009(Sep 2009) will become 001.2010 and so on. Apart form just converting the period, you will also have to take care of carrying over the balances.
3. Is it any posibilities their with out major disturbance of the existing query ?
Once you implement the above logic, you can just include the New Fiscal variant into the query.
4. Is it possible to do in query level with minor impact of performance ?
Yes, as mentioned above.
5. Is it possible to do in back end side with out redundancy of the records ?
Not sure about this.
6.I have a solution to use multiprovider on top of two infoprovides which are maintain the fiscal period based on two fiscal year variant. If I realize this it would lead major back end work.
This seems to be the best way. You will not have to touch the existing cube. Only your reports will have to be copied to the New MultiCube. The logic in the 2nd Q above will be for the new cube.
Regards,
Gaurav

Question on Purchasing documents in extended classic scenario

Hi friends
How to create local purchasing documents i.e po,confirmations,invoice, in extended classic scenario
Please let me know the path
regards
venkat reddy

Hi Venkat,
The user interface and the process is same for local documents. However the result of document posting (either backend or local) depends on the setting in SPRO --> SRM --> Technical basic Settings --> Define backend system for product category.
Here you can define the target system as the system of document posting. If the terget system specified here is your SRM system, then it will create local documents in SRM.
Regards,
Prashant
Do reward points for helpful answers

Reg: RFC / IDOC required for doing CIDX Scenario

Hi! Gurus,
This is Amar Srinivas Eli. I have task here to work and implement CIDX Scenario succesfully. There are some business cases as per the CIDX standards from that I was selected one Business case i,,e, FORECASTING.
But inorder to implement that scenario I need some RFC's or IDOC lists from SAP side whether it may be a source or target side..what ever it may be...and other side will be CIDX format.
Here I need your help in the below mentioned tasks. Kindly help me out in a detailed step by step guide and do the needful to me.
1. How to get RFC / IDOC name from R3 System and I know that I can get RFC from SE37 and IDOCs
from WE05 but I need whether all the required fileds are statisfying in the RFC's or not.
2. My first preference is only for STANDARD SAP RFCs or IDOCs.
3. Please let me know how to see the inner fields present in those RFC's
4. ALso please provide any configuration guide which contains screen shots if you already worked
earlier on CIDX Scenario I mean step by step and also for testing
5... tell me if there is any other tool other than STK kit for testing CIDX messages.
6. Is there any Freeware STK tool kit is there or not...
Also share your experience and errors that you have faces while doing this CIDX Scenario.
Regards:
Amar Srinivas Eli

Hi! All,
Thanks for your fast response..
Hi! Raja,
I gone through your points. Here I have few doubts on those please clarify that.
1. Coming to testing i didt used any testing tool , but you can comre your output using XML Spy or Stylus studio.*
*CIDx Documents,you wil find in SDN please search in SDN.
Means Without using STK Tool or else some other tool How can I get the CIDX response for my request in the Testing environment. See I am not doing this in real time I am trying to findout the solution for Business cases so I need one testing environment tool right ? Is that ALTOVA XML spy will give no right ?
Note: You told that you have done that business case IDOC--CIDX Order change / req Will you please share the information documentation I mean step by step procedure for end to end doc...based on your scenario ?
2. I know those R3 and PI settings I mean configurations means ports and RFC destinations and all those..but only thing I dono is "How you got that IDOC I mean on what basis and how did u search the IDOC?"
3. See Here I am working on topic FORECASTING it includes so many sub tasks like Deman PLan req and response, supply plan req and response and replenishment order and etc....so based on that how can I get those related RFC's or IDOC's in order to communicate from R3 Side
If Suppose I have seen one RFC/IDOC and for example out of 10 fields few are there in one IDOC and another few are there in another IDOC then in that case I need to go for Multimapping IDOCs I mean 2 Senders to one Receiver if yes Is it possible?
My first requirement is based on the above mentioned business cases how can I get the corresponding RFC's or IDOCs ?
Regards:
Amar Srinivas Eli
Edited by: Amar Srinivas Eli on Jan 5, 2009 12:19 PM

Custom fields to be included in Purchase Order in MM-SUS scenario

Hello,
We need to include some custom fields in Purchase Order, that is transferred from ERP to SUS system. We are in SRM 7.01 and the communication from ERP to SUS happens via PI using the standard PI service.
There is a SAP note 762984 for adding custom fields. Will this be applicable for our case also. Else what will be the standard approach.
thanks
Arindam.

Hi Srikanth,
Through partner dtermination you can get this requirement.
First you assign farwarding agent partner function CR in your sale document Header Partner procedure and item procedure.
Do the farwarding function assignment to delivery partner procedure and billing procedure also.
You create Master data in XK01 transaction with 0005 account group for that forwarding agent.
Now while creating sales order you enter that partner function and number of the farwarding agent(Which you got in XK01) in sales order -->Header >partner function or sales order> item-->partner functions.
System will carry these partner up to billing.
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Triggering Purchase requirment in IS-OIL scenario..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for