Trip Authorization

Hi every one,
We were using trip transaction. There was a role for authorization according to personnel subareas. Now we decide to use ESS and that is why assign the users to every personnel number at 0105 infotype.
But the authorization is now not working. Some personnel with that authorization sees every personnel. But some ones can not see even their own personnel numbers.
Is there any idea about this?
Regards,

I would interpret the trip number to mean that it does not exist and the error message is misleading.
Very often authorizations are "blamed" for configuration and data dependent testing errors.
Adding more authorizations usually does not solve the problem. Unfortunately it sometimes does, but creates a mess...
Cheers,
Julius

Similar Messages

  • No authorization for Write trip 0000000000

    Hello,
    I am testing the HR Expense authorization. While creating expense I am getting authorization error
    "No authorization for Write trip 0000000000". I have trace the error log and applied the configuration in profile as suggestion, however it is still failing. I am using SAP ERP 6.0 (702).
    Kindly let me know your thougt on above situation and to overcome from it.
    Thank you,
    Kailash

    I would interpret the trip number to mean that it does not exist and the error message is misleading.
    Very often authorizations are "blamed" for configuration and data dependent testing errors.
    Adding more authorizations usually does not solve the problem. Unfortunately it sometimes does, but creates a mess...
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Can I use the same trip number for several travelers?

    Hi everybody.
    This is my question... We need (in travel expenses) to use any field in order to group (add) several trips made for several travelers (in same dates).
    Expl: several travelers made the same trip (with different receipts and costs). We need to create a "supra-level" group (which could help our user to summarize, authorize, etc).
    I have made some tests changing the trip number assignment (in trip schema) to external one. The system seems not to have any problem if I assign the same trip number to several travelers (please, could you tell me if this is correct?).
    I´m not sure this could be the best solution, because I have one question... If I have travel request and travel expenses... can I assign external range numbers to the travel request? (how can I do it?).
    Please, could you tell me something about this? (if this is not correct, could you tell me if it´s possible to create a new field to do this?)
    Thanks!!!!!!

    Hi,
    As mentionned in an earlier response, you cannot assign the same trip number to multiple employees.
    If you are looking to group together similar claims based on the type of travel which was done, you can always use any of the following fields which can be made 'available' on the entry screen.  That is the 'Activity Type' or the 'Trip Type Specific' or the 'Trip Type Enterprise'.  By creating categories of types of travel, you can then use these values as selection parameters in your reports to isolate specific costs related to specific activities.
    For example, you know that many employees will be traveling for a specific conference and you want to be able to report on the total cost of that conference, you could create an Activity Type and ask employees to complete the field with the appropriate value when completing the claim.  Then you could create a report on that Activity Type only.
    Another option would be to use Internal Orders.  Create an internal order, have the employees assign their costs to the IO and then run a CO - IO report.
    Depending on how 'permanent' your employee groupings are, you could also use some fields on Infotype 17 to assign different employees to different employee groupings.  These employee grouping values are also available as selection parameters in the reports and can allow you to isolate groupings of individuals. 
    It all depends where you want to create the grouping....
    Hope this helps you somewhat...
    Regards,
    Roxanne Dore
    Travel & FI Consultant

  • HT5312 I cannot authorize my new Macbook Pro, I can't deauthorize my old computer; I don't have the authorize/deauthorize button on my account. I created a new Apple ID hoping this would fix the problem, but didn't realize I now do not have access to my m

    So, I bought a new Macbook Pro which i cannot authorize my itunes for. I don't even have the button indicated in the support section to authorize or deauthorize. I only have one device authorized to my account. I cant remember my security questions and cannot figure out how to change them; I think this might be the reason why i can't authorize my new device. The only way to access my itunes from my Mac is to have my iphone plugged in. Someone please help! I am a complete tard and would like to avoid a trip to the actual Apple store.

    Call Apple Care for your country and request that they assist you in resetting the security questions.
    To authorize/deauthorize a computer, go to the Store dropdown menu in the iTunes app.

  • Trip list fails in portal  - "user not found" - powl_act_query is corrupt

    Hi group,
    For one user, the trip list in portal dumps.  It dumps only for the tab/query with all trips.
    The message is "User not found" in the dump.  When we debug, we find that the table powl_act_query is corrupt. 
    For the query id in question, the key fields application and user are empty.
    We corrected the error via POWL_D01.  But can anyone explain how this could happen?
    Best regards
    Kirsten

    Hi Kirsten
    I did some checking on this error and found that it has happened on occasion that sometimes when users have their personalized queries saved in table POWL_ACT_QUERY, the names for these queries in table POWL_QUERY_T may be overwritten and subsequently the GUID is displayed on the tabstrips instead of the names.
    The solution as you found to delete the personalized queries with POWL_D01 is unfortunately the only one I couild find  to fix these queries and again show the delivered standard queries.
    Unfortunately this is more of a MC-MUS-POW issue relating to personalisation rather than travel management but you could check in SCU3 if perhaps there were any authorization errors maybe?
    This wiki link may also help
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/WDABAP/POWL
    Cheers
    Sally
    Edited by: Sally Redmond on Nov 5, 2011 10:02 AM

  • Trip expense report settlement in case of Inactive Employee

    Hi T&E Experts,
    We are facing a typical problem, in settlement of inactive employee trip expense report.
    Details are as below:
    - One of the employee moved from 1 Organisation to other. His personnel number status in old organisation is showing as "Withdrawn".
    - Some of the credit-card charges on his personnel number are still pending for settlement.
    - The current trip created to settle these charges is in "Approved - To be settled" status.
    - Now we are trying to use "PREC" transaction to settle the trip. Transaction is rejecting the trip, as personnel number is invalid (inactive).
    - Because the trip is still not in "Settled" status, we cannot use PRFI transaction to manually release the trip payment in next posting run.
    We have tried different ways like making the employee active, but nothing is working here.
    > Requesting your inputs to provide way-out in above case.
    > Also is there any standard procedure, which is to be followed in case of settlement of Inactive Employee pending charges ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Aditya

    Would agree with Mathieu in this case, changing the SYS_DATE on the authorization check is probably the most effective way of avoiding this as the authorization check is very strong in Travel for infotype 0000/0002/0017 etc.
    FM CHECK_AUTH_AUTHP.
    *    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'P_TRAVL'
    *       ID 'AUTHP' FIELD authp
    *       ID 'BUKRS' FIELD p0001-bukrs
    *       ID 'PERSA' FIELD p0001-werks
    *       ID 'KOSTL' FIELD check_kostl
    *       ID 'PERSG' FIELD p0001-persg
    *       ID 'PERSK' FIELD p0001-persk
    *       ID 'VDSK1' FIELD p0001-vdsk1
    *       ID 'PTZUO' FIELD p0017-ptzuo
    One other point is how you configure the leaving action for an employee who will be terminated (this is done via PR05 in the radio button "Organizational reassignment")
    Whilst it should not be possible to create a trip/expense report for a terminated employee, however as there may still be a need to process expenses with posting to FI/Payroll etc after the termination date
    (Table V_T582A, for the relevant HR infotypes 0000, 0001 and IT017 is relevant here and needs to be maintained) then the leaving action also becomes important.
    Finally, keep in mind that credit card expenses if you use CC clearing go to the error file for inactive employees
    This is mentioned in the wiki Processing credit card receipts and expenses for inactive employees - ERP Human Capital Management - SCN Wiki
    Hope it helps
    Sally

  • Restrict a t.code VK11 using Site as authorization object

    Hi all,
    We want to restrict VK11 t.code using Site as one of the authorizations. By default it has only Sales Org, Distr channel and division. I've added one more field for "Site" manually.
    We have defined specific values for Site in authorization objects. Still system does not restrict VK11 executed by  user as per site. It works with Sales org/Distr ch/Division. But it does not restrict Site-wise for that role.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Ankush

    > I've never got past 'play dead' with such objects
    Yip, I know that feeling. It is like when you leave home for a long trip having packed everything you need, but you still have the feeling that you have forgotten something important behind and will kick yourself when you need it.
    > Can you please provide step by step instructions for that?
    There is no step-by-step procedure nor medication to take for it. You just have to wait for it to dawn on you...
    Enjoy the weekend and happy coding authority-checks,
    Julius
    ps: I heard that this feeling is also caused by the rising popularity of ABAP OO programming techniques, where the checks are often natively imbedded.

  • Want to block users from editing the trip data once it is transferred to FI

    Hi All,
    We have a situation where users can change their trip data even when trip is transferred to FI.
    I assume some authorization needs to be taken back from the users.
    But Want to know the Details of that Authorization Object so that I can ask our User Access Management team to take necessary action.
    Plz provide your valuable suggestions on the same.
    Regards
    Nitin

    Hi,
    Authorization object P_TRAVL and  authorization field AUTHF
    Following Status should be given to user if editing is not allowed after posting to FI..
    There is a parameter Operation and "Old Status" , its 3rd position shall NOT be 4
    For more information, please find below help
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/b6/cda0db49e911d189060000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    I hope it would serve your purpose...
    Best Regards,
    Muhammad Umer

  • HT1420 One song in a playlist will not authorize in order to burn to cd

    I purchased an album yesterday and synced it to my ipod with no problems. Today I went into iTunes to burn the playlist to a cd. As it begins to burn, one of the songs is grayed out and not checked. It keeps giving me the message to authorize the computer, which I have done several times. This one particular song, which was purchase as part of a complete album, keeps tripping up. I am not sure what to do at this point. It will not play the song, and will not burn to the cd.
    Thanks,
    Jess

    I only got my Zen V Plus yesterday! I need help!

  • Authorization Checks in Travel Expenses

    hello everybody
    i have a problem whit my TM project.
    here we have employee and manager.
    when employee save and send own travel expenses he cannot change it later (and this is a request for us).
    But when manager do the same operation later the link "modify travel expenses" is enabled
    we don't want this
    i try to change the authorization role for manager in PFCG transaction and delete from AUTHF field the value W31 .
    In this case the link to be disabled but the manager lost authorization for approve employee trips.
    so i decided to assign a value in field AUTHP (i set value E) but nothing changed (info type 0105, sub type 0001 is assigned correctly).
    any suggestion?
    thanks
    PS:i want manager cannot modify own trip after saved (like all employee) but he still to able to approve employee trips.

    i think i not explain me correctly.
    so... my problem is following:
    the manager is able to approve the employee trip (and this is ok)
    The employee can insert their own travel expenses. After save and send the modify functionality is disable. So he can do this operatione only one time. (and this is ok)
    The manager can insert their own travel expenses. After save and send this functionality still to be enable. (this is NO ok)
    I changed the authorisation: when i remove W31 from Manager Role i solve the problem but.... Manager is no more able to approve trip....
    I want manager able to approve employee trips but not modify their own travel expenses.
    i hope you understand me

  • HRTRV_IF_MODIFY_TRIP - account authorization check in PR01?

    I used the SAP standard function module HRTRV_IF_MODIFY_TRIP to modify the trip expenses for our customerized Travel Services online tool.
    In this function module, it called T code PR01 instead of PR05.
    Some of the users will get run time errors when they called this function module HRTRV_IF_MODIFY_TRIP because they do not have the authorizations for the cost center/WBS element used in trip.
    How can I turn off the FI account authorization check  in PR01?
    We do not have this FI account authorization check  in PR05.
    Thanks!
    Fisher Li

    I finally figured how to fix my issue of this function module HRTRV_IF_MODIFY_TRIP. In my case, I assigned the expense of the whole trip to account 1 and business area 1. I put this account assignment in the table COSTDIST_TRIP.
    If this whole trip had two expense items - $500 for Hotel and $100 for Meals. I assigned $60 of the meals to account 2 and business area 2 and I only put this assignment in table COSTDIST_RECE.
    Because the function module are expecting the rest of the account assignment for the meals which I assumed that it should go to the account assignment for the whole trip, the business area 1 for the whole trip disappeared after the data were modified.
    After I change my program and adding the default account assignment
    (account 1 and business area 1) for the $40 of the meal in table COSTDIST_RECE, everything worked.

  • Authorizing MBA when authorizations are used up

    I bought a MBA a month ago before leaving on a trip to India. I am in rural India now. I updated OS software and now am getting a message that my laptop is not authorized. I cannot authorize it or deauthorize it and apparently cannot deauthorize other Macs I left in the USA.
    I am not in a place where I can get phone calls. The Apple chat service is not working in India:
    HTTP Status 503 - This application is not currently available
    type Status report
    message This application is not currently available
    description The requested service is not currently available.
    Apache Tomcat/6.0.36
    This is VERY frustrating.
    BTW, when I asked at the Apple Store in Miami Beach, the salesman told me that there is no limit to how many devices can be authorized. "We did away with the limitation years ago."  That is not true. Only 5 laptops can be authorized.
    Can anyone help? Thank you.

    I am going to suppose you are talking about iTunes device authorizations, since the Macbook itself is not subject to "authorizations", but registration, for which there is no limit, per se.
    When you have reached the limit of iTunes device authorizations, but have no access to any of those devices, all you can do is de-authorize ALL of the devices. Sign into the iTunes store and de-authorize all the devices. Afterward, you can go ahead and reauthorize those devices you care to, subject to the 5 computer limit.
    Here's an article that explains the process in some depth.

  • Change in Trip schema button in transaction TRIP

    Hello all,
    I need to enable the button Change in Trip schema in transaction code TRIP.
    We are implementing Travel Management for Thailand and this button is actually grayed.
    Is there a way to get this button available?
    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Best regards,
    Soumaya

    Hi Soumaya,
    I hope I understood the question correctly - If the change button is grayed out then it is possibly because of the authorisations set up. Please see the link below
    Authorization Checks in Travel Expenses - Travel Expenses - SAP Library 
    Thanks
    Ankur

  • Hide the Approve button in TRIP transaction

    Please,
    I read that I if I want to hide the 'Approve' button automatically I must pass proper values in Auth Object F_TRAVL and P_TRAVL.
    Do you know, specifically, which authorization field and value I must have in P_TRAVL?
    I thank you in advance,
    Cláudia.
    Edited by: User BasisMasterUser on Mar 30, 2011 7:56 PM
    Edited by: User BasisMasterUser on Mar 30, 2011 7:57 PM

    Hi and thanks for the answer.
    We use the transaction PRAP for approval all the travel, so we need to prevent a simple user can approve the trip in the TRIP transaction. As I could not find an authorization object that correspond to the button of approval, we thought better to hide it.
    Unfortunately I did not see in the TRVPA feature anything that influences me in the way of approval, except that the WRP is equal to 3 which sets the approval status only for travel completed.
    Am I mistaken?
    I thank you again,
    Cláudia.
    Edited by: User BasisMasterUser on Mar 31, 2011 3:35 PM

  • Logic Studio authorization?

    Okay, I can't seem to find a clear explanation of how Logic's authorization works so I'm hoping maybe you guys can shed some light on it for me.
    From my understanding I can have Logic installed and running on two computers, is that correct?
    So here's my situation. I do all the mixing but I've got a partner in California that sometimes I'll do some tracking at his place. I record a few of the bands he manages so sometimes I'll send him a mix I'm working on to check out and maybe the band will make a few adjustments and then send it back my way. In theory I should be able to buy Logic, install on my machine and install it on his machine as well when I go out there the next trip, right?
    Secondly, I'm on 10.4.11 right now. I'm upgrading to Leopard in a few weeks but because I'm a pack rat I'm going to install everything fresh on a new hard drive and move my existing system drive to an external case so that if I run into any issues I can always boot from Tiger instead of Leopard. If I have Logic installed on two different drives on the same machine, would that eat up my '2nd computer' right there?
    Thanks in advance for the help.

    Everything Bee Jay said is correct. As always
    However, just to clarify the technicalities of the license, the license specifies that you can install Logic on one Laptop and one Desktop, both of which *you own and operate*.
    Here's the exact wording, taken from the license:
    A. This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on one Apple-labeled desktop computer and one Apple labeled laptop computer so long as both computers are owned and used by you. This License does not allow the Apple Software to run on more than one computer at a time.
    Again, Bee Jay's right, that there's nothing physically stopping you from installing one on yours and one on your friends (in other words, Logic can't tell who owns the computer), but unless everything in the above statement is true, you will be violating the license.

Maybe you are looking for