Troubleshooting CUPS integration with Sametime.

Hi all ...
I need to integrate CUPS with Sametime to see Presence on Sametime.
On CUPS, when using Diagnostics > System Troubleshooter I have under Presence Engine Troubleshooter the warning:
Verify SIP Publish Model.
Probelm: Possible selectid SIP trunk contains invalid destination address > Please verify destination address fot selected SIP trunk on the CUCM is matching one of the CUPS in the cluster.
^^ I ve checked that, and it is correctly matching the Presence Server.
Any idea of what could be the solution ?
thx

OK, ... so one of the CUP PUBLISH trunk on one of my CUCM node was wrong.
thx

Similar Messages

CUP integration with Abode online forms

Hi forums gurus,
We are currently implementing GRC AC version 5.3, SP15. The client has the requirement to use Adobe online forms to capture the request details, this must then feed into CUP and populate the landing page.
1) Is this scenario possible?
2) Has this been done before?
3) Will it involve customisation and re-development of code or would it be an interface?
Any advice would be highly appreciated.
Rgds,
Prevo

Hi,
Have you tried using the web services avalaible for IDM, I am pretty sure you could use those to integrate it with the Adobe form, tehy are avalaible in the config guide.
Regards,
Chinmaya

SPM integration with CUP 5.3

All the issues regarding SPM integration with CUP is resolved, with the exception of one which is mentioned below:
Any user can go and raise a request for the FF ID from CUP Super User Access workflow, and are created in the backend, but they do not get the access to FF ID when trying to Login.
My query: is there any means to capture the user detail much in advance while the request is processed in the workflow and reject the request before it could be created and stored in backend.
Ideally The user not having minimum privilege of u201C/VIRSA/Z_VFAT_FIREFIGHTERu201D should not Login with the FF ID, which is met here, but this is checked only after the user get the access to FF ID and try to LOG into FF ID using his Login detail.
Please put some clarity on this.
Thanks,
Abhimanu Singh

Hi Sabita,
Thanks for the reply but this do not answer my question. Let me come in detail on this topic:
SAP Backend:
We have FF ID Owner, FF ID Controller, FF ID and Firefighters in the Backend.
FF ID owner has the minimun role required for becoimng the owner is /VIRSA/Z_VFAT_ID_OWNER.
FF ID Controller created with the minimum role /VIRSA/Z_VFAT_ID_OWNER for the monitoring purpose of all the reports.
FF ID is defined with the defined task in the role being assigned to it.
Firefighter is created with the minimum role /VIRSA/Z_VFAT_FIREFIGHTER to get the access to FF ID for the limited period as defined by the FF ID Owner.
For example:
FF ID Owner: User ID is FFO
FF ID Controller: User ID is FFC
FF ID: User ID is FID
Firefighter: User ID is FFS
Now the Question is from
SAP Frontend Java stack
I can see that the users(other than FFS) who are not defined as firefighter in the backend can still go and put a request for the FF ID access and gets provisioned.
When you go and check in the backend with the firefighter Owner ID/FF Administrator ID you can see the requested user listed there with the limited time period in the firefighter list.
Now comes the real picture: when this user(other than FFS) tries to login using his user ID he will not get the FF ID Login link on the page which is ideally correct. This is because any user not defined as firefighter in the backend with the minimum role /VIRSA/Z_VFAT_FIREFIGHTER should not get the access to FF ID.
My question comes here:
Is there any option in the frontend which could inform the user (other than FFS) much in advance and stop him requesting for the FF ID which has no meaning since it is finally not going to get the access in the backend to the FF ID.
Please get back to me if you require some more information.
Thanks,
Abhimanu Singh

CUPS 8.X integrated with Microsoft OCS

Hello all,
I'm looking for a list of pros cons for whenever you integrate presence with Microsoft OCS is there a doc out there that will tell you which features you will not have in OCS if you do an integration like this ?
or is there a document that will show what features are supported ?
thank you

Not sure if it helps but in the first pages of the document below you have an overview of the integration with the supported / unsupported features and the limitations
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns414/ns728/ns784/870259.pdf
HTH
Christos

CUPS 8 with OCS

Hi,
I'm integrating the CUPS 8 with OCS R2 for the RCC feature.In the MOC i got the error message no connection to the phone.
When i started the troubleshooting from the OCS SIP stack debugging , " SIP 2.0 401 unauthorized " from the CUPS.
I'm not able to do the any troubleshooting from the CUPS because of the following issue.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3123662#3123662
Thanks.

"Unauthorized" could be caused by multiple issues:
1) CUCM > User Management > End User. Device was not associated with the user.
2) CUCM > User Management > End User. End user was not in "Standard CTI Enable" group.
3) CUCM > Device > Phone. Device or line does not have the check box "Allow Controlled from CTI" enabled.
4) CUCM > User Management > End User. There are more than one device associated with the user, but the "Line URI" in Active Directory was not able to identify the device uniquely (i.e. specifying the device name).
Take a look at http://www.lulu.com/content/5552336
Michael
http://htluo.blogspot.com

Jabber cannot Call - Integration with CUCM/AD

Dear all,
I installed CUCM 9.1.1 and CUPS 9.1.1 with Jabber client 9.0.1.
when I run Jabber on a joined domain PC (login with AD username and password), there are no problem with the calling ability.
But when I try to use a non-join domain PC (I am using VPN to connect to office network and using my personal PC), only the chatting feature that are available. I cannot loggin to phone accounts and cannot make any calls with my Jabber client.
Should I use UDS integration with AD?
Thanks,
Hasan

Hi Hasan,
Can you take a look on this thread:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3914353#3914353
If you still have problem connecting, can you try with newer version of Jabber?
Regards,
Srdjan

Jabber and CUPC with SAMETIME

What does the Jabber service and client provide and what does the CUPC client provide? Do I need both? Which will provide me video conferencing? Can I interface with SAMETIME and have all of the same features for the users, between the users? Are there any limitations?
Thanks!

Thank you Leonardo. I was able to access the second link.
But I do have a few more questions...
What does "not support video calls in deskphone mode only in softphone mode mean?"
So CUPC and Jabber use independent servers, and they have their own clients. According to the document it says I need "CUP, CUCM and Unity Connection or in a Cloud-based soultion using the Cisco Webex services". Does this mean if I use the combination of products I don't require Webex? Can I build my own Cloud-based Webex solution, or is the one that I have to subscribe to?
Is there a protocol diagram showing how all talk to one another via protocol? Are all connections encrypted?
For my client message can I have it take the information from the users Exchange Calendar vice them selecting Available, Away, and Do Not disturb?
Jabbers client is collecting numbers from a directory server. Does this directory server retrieve the information from Active directory? We want to have a central source for all user information.
To perform desktop sharing I need CUCM 8.6 and associating a "device" with a BFCP-enabled SIP profile. I'm not clear on associated a device and what BFCP is. What if the user doesn't use the same workstation everyday, or their mobile. Do we just need to ensure all devices are registered with CUCM? We also use VDI. Not sure how all of this ties together.
Thanks!

Understanding ERM and CUP integration in AC 10.0

Iu2019m reaching out in hopes to get a better understanding of how AC 10.0 is meant to handle the ERM and CUP integration (Iu2019m still stuck on the old names :). Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Currently, we have a requirement to setup the GRC Production box so it can provision user access in the Production ECC but create security roles in Development ECC. This is typically what we see since most clients want to follow their manual transport process to get the security roles from Dev --> QA --> Prod.
Something I noticed in CUP is when a user adds a role to the request form u2013 the role is associated to a system (i.e. Production ECC or Development ECC). If we create a role using ERM and it only gets generated in Development ECC u2013 will we be able to select this role in CUP for user assignment in Production ECC? (assuming itu2019s been transported outside of GRC)
Note: At this point the new role will only be associated to Development ECC from a GRC perspective? So if we assign it in CUP u2013 it will only be associated to Development ECC...?
Do we have to manually perform another u201Crole import / syncu201D from the Production ECC to sync the roles so theyu2019re available in CUP?
This is based on the understanding that CUP looks for available roles for assignment from ERM rather than the Production ECC. Is that correct? Can we have CUP look in the backend rather than ERM?
My question is around the manual u201Crole import / syncu201D that needs to get performed for CUP. Is this really mandatory based on the requirements? It would mean I need to perform a u201Crole import / syncu201D every time a new role is created/deleted/changedu2026 Maybe Iu2019m missing something with the new 10.0 integration / functionality? Are other companies doing something different?
Please let me know what you think. Your insight is greatly appreciated!

Frank,
Thanks for clarifying.
Can you clarify what you mean when you say "you just need to tell CUP that the roles are available in PRD"? What does this mean?
This goes back to the original question - do we need to perform another import of the roles from ECC PRD to ERM? My understanding is that the ERM role repository is looking at my original import of roles and then each role I create using ERM after that. How will it know which roles are in PRD if I don't do a routine synch?
Also, you mentioned "each role has attributes that define in which systems it should be available for requests", where does this get defined? I believe you are referring to the "Role Status" which is set to Development, Production or Testing. I only see the ability to set this during the Role Import, but what about roles which have been created using ERM. I don't see it in the Role details screen - where is the setting?

ISE integration with Prime Infrastructure,

Hi Team,
I would like to know what are the advantages and Disadvantages of the ISE integration with Prime Infrastructre.Also how the LAN, wifi, and identity management part (guest access etc) will work together.
Cheers!!!
Minakshi

Prime Infrastructure manages the wired and the wireless clients in the network. When Cisco ISE is used as a RADIUS server to authenticate clients, Prime Infrastructure collects additional information about these clients from Cisco ISE and provides all client relevant information to Prime Infrastructure to be visible in a single console.
When posture profiling is enforced in the network, Prime Infrastructure talks to Cisco ISE to get the posture data for the clients and displays it along with other client attributes. When Cisco ISE is used to profile the clients or an endpoint in the network, Prime Infrastructure collects the profiled data to determine what type of client it is, whether it is an iPhone, iPad, an Android device, or any other device.
Cisco ISE is assisting Prime Infrastructure to monitor and troubleshoot client information, and displays all the relevant information for a client in a single console.

ESSO-PG integration with SIM

Hi everybody!
I have to integrate the SIM connector with ESSO-Provisoning Gateway but I don't understand well the file PasslogixUpgrade.
I have my repository of credentials (Active Directory, this would be my Root resource) and I have simulated resource (this would be my Non-root resource)
I need understand how is the process for provision the credentials....
Could someone explain how it works?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
Check the following article in metalink.
1. eSSO: Overview And Troubleshooting Provisioning Gateway [ID 549189.1]
2. eSSO: Overview And Troubleshooting Of OIM Integration With Provisioning Gateway [ID 550639.1]
Regards,
NS

Meeting Place 8.6 Integration with Webex

Hi, I would like to get a better understanding of workflow and packet flow for MP 8.6 integration with Webex.
My customer is looking to initiate an on prem meeting with MP 8.6 via outlook scheduling /jabber (if possible). All audio and video would be on prem. Also, this would be a multipoint video call, so I am assuming an MCU would be required (unless MP 8.6 provide MCU capabilities).
Then, through a federated IM environment, my customer would like to be able to chat with an external partner via jabber and escalete the on prem MP8.6 conference to a Webex meeting to add the external partner to the meeting.
Questions
1. Are you able to walk me through how this would work?
2. Can you recommend a bill or materials based on the scenario and facts below? Right now I am assuming we need CUWL professional for required users, a UCS C210, an MCU and Webex subscription.
Current Assumptions & Questions
1. In this scenario the audio bridge would have to remain on prem and the external partner could request a call from meeting place to join the audi bridge back via Webex. Correct?
2. If am MCU is being used on prem for the multipoint video conference and the conference was escalated to a webex via jabber how many video connections to Webex would there be? Single multiplexed video from the MCU or individual video connections from on prem to Webex and Webex would combine the video sources?
3. Is Webex Node still required?
4. With MP 8.6 is scheduling still tightly integrated with Outlook?
Facts:
1. Users are a combination of CUWL standard and professional. Professional users for conferencing and mobile jabber.
2. Customer has TP envrironment which would be multipoint video participants
3. Customer has compatible CUCM and CUPS with MP 8.6
4. Jabber desktop will be installed on all clients
5. Customer is expanding PRI, ISR and DSP resources to support additional audio requirements

All - what have discoverd is Meeting Place node is going away. Meetings will be held in Webex moving forward and MP should be used as an on prem audio bridge only. Some new WebEx solutions are on the roadmap.

OIM 9.1.0 Integration with Active Directory 2008 R2

Hi,
My customer is running Root/Child AD structure based on windows 2003 w/SP2, OIM 9.1.0 deployed under one of the child domains, and integrated with child domains controllers which runs windows server 2003 as well.
My customer has decided to upgrade his AD to Windows Server 2008 R2 domain controllers across the entire AD Forest and still wants to integrate the current OIM v9.1.0 with AD for all of his Users provisioning and password synchronizations.
Am not sure if current OIM version of OIM 9.1.0 is compatible and supported by OIM v9.1.0 under active directory version 2008 / R2, and not sure if it can be integrated with such AD version.
Any guidance is really appreciated.
Also I was thinking of such scenario but also not sure of its support ability and if OIM will keep working on such scenario, the scenario is to upgrade only the AD root domain to Windows 2008 R2 while keeping the child domain holding the OIM 9.1.0 at Windows 2003 version.
Is this a working and supported scenario by OIM v9.1.0 ?

I believe you question should be if the connector supports this architecture. Check out the versions supported for the connector you are using and you should be good.
-Bikash

Service desk integration with 3rd party tool

Hi all,
I've problems understanding the setup of connecting a 3rd party service desk tool with solman itsm.
So far it's clear that I need to activate and configure the service provider and consumer in soamanager.
The webservice then will be called by the 3rd party tool with corresponding data.
However, according to spro I need to define a value mapping for incoming/outgoing calls.
I do not understand this mapping... the WSDL of webservice ICT_SERVICE_DESK_API contains lots of fields, but in spro -> value mapping I can only define the following fields (which are hard coded in type pool AIICT):
SAPCategory
SAPComponent
SAPDatabase
SAPFrontend
SAPIncidentID
SAPIncidentStatus
SAPInstNo
SAPOperatingSystem
SAPSoftwareComponent
SAPSoftwareComponentPatch
SAPSoftwareComponentRelease
SAPSubject
SAPSystemClient
SAPSystemID
SAPSystemType
SAPUserStatus
What about attachments, priority etc.?
Will the interface parameters mapped to these ones?
For what purpose do I need to maintain the value mapping?
Can you give me a hint?
Regards, Richard Pietsch

can you please check the WIKI Solution manager Service Desk Integration with third party service desk - SAP Solution Manager - Security and Authorizat…

Java Stack mandatory for a SAP BI system integrated with EP?

Hi Guru's,
Currently we are using SAP NetWeaver 2004 s version 7.0 system for our BI.
This is integrated with the EP. But our BI system does not contain the Java Stack installed.
When we work on WAD templates and execute the template, it is automatically directed to EP portal where we can see our reports.
Here my question is do we need Java Stack for this system to use ADOBE DOCUMENT services or can it work with EP only for the web functionalities.
Any info on this is of great help.
Best Regards
Kumar

HI Reddy,
We came to know from our basis team that we do not have the Java Stack installed in our BI 7.x system yet.
As it is integrated with EP which has Java, our web reports are working.
1) But my question is still do we ned to install the Java Stack in our BI system as i do not find any Export to PDF option in EP for the reports (eventhough AS Java supports this).
2) Or can we use the existing configuration without Java STack integrated to EP for the new tools like Report Designer and Integrated Planning?
Regards
Kumar

Session keep Alive when EBS is integrated with OIF acting as SP

We have an E-Business Suite R12(12.1.3) Application which is integrated with Oracle Access Manager 11.1.1.5. For authentication the Oracle Access Manager delegates the authentication request to Oracle Identity Federation acting as a Service Provider (SP). There is a home-grown SSO which acts as the Identity provider by Federating it with OIF using SAML 2.0 protocol.
The integration is successful and EBS is able to authenticate using this third party SSO.
Now there are multiple applications which are integrated with this third party SSO and the user can access any of these applications including EBS.
Considering a scenario where a user is using EBS Application say for more than 30 mins. Now when he tries to login to another application the challenge screen is thrown though he can continue to work on EBS without any issue. The reason being that the session timeout on the IDP side is set to 30 mins.
To overcome this issue the solution that has been thought of using a javascript for each page load on the application which will update the SSO token with the latest UTC time on the IDP server. This has been successfully done for all other applications except EBS.
So my question is how we can call this java script for each page load for EBS?
Thanks & Regards
Sarbashis

It appears that OAM is removing the url parameters for the p_done_url sent to it by OIF.
302 Redirect to -> Location: https://sso.mycompany.com/oam/server/logout?p_done_url=https%3A%2F%2Fsso.mycompany.com%2Ffed%2Fuser%2Fsloosso%3Fid%3Dosso%26type%3D3&invokeOSFSLogout=false
Result: 200. Set-Cookie OAM-ID to expired.
Form Submits: https://sso.mycompany.com/fed/user/sloosso
Result: 500 Error
Notice the p_done_url value in the redirect has extra parameters which when the Form is submitted are lost.
If I manually enter the url: https://sso.mycompany.com/fed/user/sloosso?id=osso&type=3&invokeOSFSLogout=false
Then I am successfully logged out.
This seems almost like a bug in OAM...

Troubleshooting CUPS integration with Sametime.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for