Troubleshooting Maximum No. of Order Proposals Exceeded

Hi PP Gurus,
Can any of you tell me the best way to troubleshoot the above problem after an MRP run? When I run MRP in the background - MDBT I occasionally get an error in the log saying "Maximum no. of order proposals per deadline exceeded" for one or more materials. I have found I can track this down using CO46 and showing only transaction with exception group 8 (terminations) but I have to run this one MRP Controller at a time and I have around 20.
Any suggestions for a simpler method.
Thanks,
R

Dear,
Please refer my reply from this link,
Maximum no. of order proposals per deadline exceeded
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

Maximum no. of order proposals per deadline exceeded

Hi PP gurus,
When I am running MRP through T Code MD42, the error :Maximum no. of order proposals per deadline exceeded is coming.
In the material master Lot Size is Fixed order quantity (FX) wit Fixed lot size 65, when I am changing this to >80 , MRP Run is executing without any error. Pls. come with your views reg this
Note :In OPPQ Max no of proposals is 50 and in OMDV No of planned order is 500.
Anupama

Hi Datta...
I have the same problem, when I want to run MRP there is a message error "Maximum no. of order proposals per deadline exceeded". I was maintained forecasting and MRP on material master for this material.
I try to change the value of max no. of proposal of 50 to 80. And the problem is fix..
My question, Why I must increase the value? And how the fixed value that I must set in SPRO?
Thx u

Limiting Order Proposals

We have a business scenario where we will only intend to produce over a period of time a particular quantity that are customer has committed to buy. There may be multiple process orders over the course of weeks or months to make this quantity. Materials are procured by vendors based on that quantity, and not tracked in SAP.
However there are circumstances where forecast or sales orders may exceed this committed quantity, and planned orders generated by the MPS run can then exceed committed quantities.
There is a need for this to be flagged for the planner for followup to either reduce the demand or to expedite additional materials with the vendors.
Is there any way for the system to keep track of historical and planned production and to generate an exception message if order proposals exceed committed quantity, prevent MPS from creating planned order proposals beyond committed quantity, or to prevent conversion of planned orders to process orders when they would cause the committed quantity to be exceeded?

Hi,
It looks as if you are doing material allocations per customer.
There's a specific functionality for this, check it up.
After you have defined the allocations, you then can use the atp logic against these allocations.
This will lead close to what you are looking for, since if a customer has used all of its allocation the system will not commit any further, even if there is stock available.
Hope this helps a bit; I know that there's some work to do to make this work.
Regards,
Mario

Maximum percentage for open items exceeded

Hi,
i would like check what actually this SAP pop up message mean ?
"maximum percentage for open items exceeded."
this message appear when i creating a sales order.

Hi,
This is related to Credit mngt. You can either disable credit mngt, or make payments for some of the invoices. Then you will be create sales order without any problem
Hope this helps.
Reward if this helps you

ORA-01925: maximum of 148 enabled roles exceeded

Hi
i m running oracle 9i db R2. i m receiveing this error plz help me how can i resolve this issue.My max_enabled_roles parameter has value 148.
ORA-01925: maximum of 148 enabled roles exceeded
Thanks

Hi,
what is the result of the below query you are getting .. ??
SQL> SELECT grantee, count(*)
2 FROM (SELECT grantee, granted_role
3 FROM dba_role_privs
4 CONNECT BY PRIOR grantee = granted_role)
5 GROUP BY grantee
6 HAVING count(*) = (SELECT max(count(*))
FROM (SELECT grantee, granted_role
7 8 FROM dba_role_privs
9 CONNECT BY PRIOR grantee=granted_role)
10 GROUP BY grantee);
Increasing max_enabled_roles will not help.
The max limit is 148 per the Oracle documentation. If you go through the
documentation carefully this parameter is defined as "the maximum number of database roles that users can enable, including roles contained within other roles"
Try to check or re-modify the structures (role),whether user needs max opf 148 roles in order to function properly or not.
Note :-
For your reference if you want to modify the parametes values ,
using ALTER SYETEM SET max_enabled_roles=<some value> scope = memory or spfile. (Based on the your db, which parameter it might be using.
Thanks
Pavan Kumar N

Java.lang.Exception: ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded?

When i run my web-application with the embedded OC4J server, the following error message is prompted:
java.lang.Exception: ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded
 void MyFolder.objects.MyObject.<init>(oracle.jbo.ApplicationModule, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest)
 void MyFolder.servlet.MyServlet.doPost(javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse)
 void javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletRequest, com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletResponse)
 void javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse)
 void javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse)
 void com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse)
 void com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse)
 boolean com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(com.evermind.server.ApplicationServerThread, com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletRequest, com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletResponse, java.io.InputStream, java.io.OutputStream, boolean)
 void com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(java.lang.Thread)
 void com.evermind.util.ThreadPoolThread.run()
Question:
- What is the cause of this error message? How to avoid?
- I intended to deploy my application to 9IAS server. Will the same problem occurs too?
Thanks for your reply!

Hi Pig,
When i run my web-application with the embedded OC4J server, the following error message is prompted:
java.lang.Exception: ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (150) exceeded
 void MyFolder.objects.MyObject.<init>(oracle.jbo.ApplicationModule, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest)
 void MyFolder.servlet.MyServlet.doPost(javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse)
 void javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletRequest, com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletResponse)
 void javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse)
 void javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse)
 void com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse)
 void com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse)
 boolean com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(com.evermind.server.ApplicationServerThread, com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletRequest, com.evermind.server.http.EvermindHttpServletResponse, java.io.InputStream, java.io.OutputStream, boolean)
 void com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(java.lang.Thread)
 void com.evermind.util.ThreadPoolThread.run()
Question:
- What is the cause of this error message? How to avoid?.
From the Oracle error message documentation:
ORA-00020 maximum number of processes (string) exceeded
Cause: All process state objects are in use.
Action: Increase the value of the PROCESSES initialization parameter.
Another alternative approach may be to configure your Connection pool and/or your ApplicationModule pool to optimize the use of
database connections and/or restrict the number of database connections used by the application. For example, if your application
has declared many root ApplicationModules (i.e. more than one ApplicationModule pool is in use) then it may help to enable the
jbo.doconnectionpooling switch so that each ApplicationModule instance in the pools does not maintain a dedicated database
connection while not in use. Another alternative if you are using the BC4J connection pool (not a JDBC datasource) may be to
restrict the number of connections the pool can create to < 150 with the jbo.maxpoolsize switch. However, please note that this
may have an impact on throughput.
- I intended to deploy my application to 9IAS server. Will the same problem occurs too?.
This is a database issue. So, yes.
Hope this helps.
JR

SAP F&R - Order Proposals not getting generated

Hi Experts,
I am currently on SCM 5.0 system. For a location-product on uploading the consumption data, the forecast gets generated but no Order Proposals are getting generated at all. When I look at the Source of Supply, the delivery dates for the location-product are appropriately displayed.
The scenario is basically Vendor -> DC -> Store i.e. V111 -> R601 -> R611 for the product FR11. The time series of supplying location is displayed for FR11-R611 in CADE while FR11-R601 is not displayed. I suppose, this may be, why the OPs are not getting generated. How do we generate time series for FR11-R601 i.e. for V111 (vendor) ?
Also, When i try to run a location status check on R611, /FRE/FU_CL_FRP_SAFOUT_CRIT comes out with a fatal error with the remaining others in an INITIAL state. How do we resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Prashant

Hi,
I was able to solve both the issues with a change in the Forecasting Frequency profiles where the reference day for start week was on "FRP Location Activation Date". I changed it to Calendar date and checked the forecast and it worked with the Order proposals also generating. Also, the location status check out for the mentioned location was in "OK" state.
Also, a second methodology applied to overcome the problem was to go to SAP Menu -> F&R Processor -> Administration, from there go to the location tab where the locations had a deactivation date of 31.12.2009. I extended the date and then there was no need to change the forecasting frequency profiles.
Regards
Prashant
Edited by: Prashant Kedare on Mar 3, 2010 9:38 AM

RuntimeException: Maximum number of gradient stops exceeded (paint uses 17

I run into this exception occasionally
java.lang.RuntimeException: Maximum number of gradient stops exceeded (paint uses 17 stops, but max is 12)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.stopsToImage(PaintHelper.java:94)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.initGradient(PaintHelper.java:137)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.setMultiGradient(PaintHelper.java:164)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.PaintHelper.setLinearGradient(PaintHelper.java:271)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.updatePaintShader(BaseShaderContext.java:208)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.validatePaintOp(BaseShaderContext.java:378)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.validatePaintOp(BaseShaderContext.java:325)
at com.sun.prism.impl.ps.BaseShaderContext.validatePaintOp(BaseShaderContext.java:284)
at com.sun.prism.impl.BaseContext.validateClearOp(BaseContext.java:78)
at com.sun.prism.d3d.D3DGraphics.clear(D3DGraphics.java:64)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRunnable.doPaint(PaintRunnable.java:206)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRunnable.paintImpl(PaintRunnable.java:145)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.PaintRunnable.run(PaintRunnable.java:349)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.prism.render.RenderJob.run(RenderJob.java:29)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at com.sun.javafx.tk.quantum.QuantumRenderer$PipelineRunnable.run(QuantumRenderer.java:101)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Running javafx 2.0.2 with java 1.7.02 on windows 7
Anyone else encountered this and is there a workaround?
In the system there is are rectangles with fill to something similar to
-fx-fill: linear-gradient(from 0% 0% to 100% 0%, rgb(177,177,177) 0%, rgb(255,128,255) 7%, rgb(210,59,54) 12%, rgb(248,100,100) 22%, rgb(252,180,180) 43%, rgb(250,200,200) 44%, rgb(170,170,170) 45%, rgb(248,248,248) 46%, rgb(248,248,248) 59%, rgb(200,200,200) 62%, rgb(180,180,180) 64%, rgb(167,167,167) 65%, rgb(200,200,200) 67%, rgb(248,248,248) 70%, rgb(248,248,248) 90%, rgb(200,200,200) 95%, rgb(166,185,238) 100%);In this case, there are 17 stops to this linear-gradient. If the number of stops is lowered, the exception occurs less often. Based on the exception, it looks like if there is a gradient with more than 12 stops, it is possible to run into this exception.
Thanks
Edited by: 907429 on Jan 12, 2012 10:18 AM

Please post a short reproducible test case surrounded with markers and/or log a bug with a reproducible test case at http://javafx-jira.kenai.com

BEX analyzer -Maximum number of rows (65535) exceeded. Result is incomplete

Hello Experts,
I am trying to Run a report on BEx Analyzer.There are around 200,000 records to be displayed in the result.
I am getting the below error.
Maximum number of rows (65535) exceeded. Result is incomplete.
Message no. BRAIN675
We are on SAP GUI 7.X and Excel 2007
Is there any setting that I have to change inorder for BEX analyzer to display all the 200,000 records.
Also any memory setting for the result set to be changed ?
Please let me know your thoughts
Thanks
Doodle

Hi Doodle,
The rows limit for Excel 2007 is 1 million so this is not the problem with row limitation. It seems like you have opened the pre-excel 2007 workbook in excel 2007, check your title bar if it says "Compatible Mode". This will limit you to old standard of 65K.
May be what you can do is , save your file using save as option and try running the workbook.
Your new file extension will be .xlsx
Regards,
Durgesh.
Edited by: Durgesh Gandewar on Jul 14, 2011 10:03 AM

F&R order proposals

Is it possible for F&R order proposals to be converted into purchase requistions in SAP ERP?

HI,
Check this link,go thro the
Direct transfer of order proposals at the end of the document
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/en/d8/387c882c144c08b31ca1a7ea60f72d/content.htm]
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/en/77/9822fc0bcb48d5a26c8b07670f0c8d/frameset.htm]
murugan
Edited by: Murugan mgl on Jul 31, 2009 1:08 PM

SAP F&R: Release Order Proposals automatically

Hi,
I am not able to find the necessary SPRO Customizing settings in SAP F&R 5.1 wherein I can define the order proposals to be released immediately after the forecasting run. It would be great if someone would be able to guide me through.
Best Regards
Prashant Kedare

You need to work on Exception management to supress some messages , Further more there are some standard inbuilt checks which we cannot bypass through configuration. I would suggest you to use BADI -Method FU_OPM_BADI_001_CHECK_ORDER.

PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 123,456

Hi,
I have selected the default value for 'Propose all items' in the MIGO settings option, to enable early GR against a Scheduling Agreement.
Now, When i try to do a GR with MIGO i am getting the following error message: PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 123,456
I beleive we can change this 'Error Message' into a 'Warning Message'. Please help with the configurations to do this.
Please help. This is very urgent.
Thanks,
Manju

hi,
I have implemented whatz mentioned in OSS Note # 741385.
Use transaction CMOD create a new project.
Enter MEVME001 as enhancement, select EXIT_SAPLEINR_001 function module
under Components, and enter the following source code in INCLUDEs ZXM06U28:
data: ls_ekpo like ekpo.
move pot to ls_ekpo.
f4 = ls_ekpo-menge + ls_ekpo-menge * ls_ekpo-uebto / 100.
Activate the function and exit the project.
Note that in transaction MIGO the 'propose all items' field should be set
to the default values.
But still when I check the document i am getting the same error PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 123,456
Please advise. This is very very urgent.
Thanks,
Manju
Edited by: Manju Veena on Mar 26, 2008 6:51 AM

Essbase error maximum number of columns [1] exceeded [15]

I am getting Essbase error: maximum number of columns [1]exceeded [15]This message started appearing after HBR 3.5.1 installWhen I retireve from the same excel spreadsheet on a machinewhich does not have HBR installed it works. I do need to use HBRso, how do I resolve this?

Retrieving more than 500,000 rows in excel are you sure you are using the correct tool, sounds like you are just trying to data dump out of essbase, have a look at other export options.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

SAPSCRIPT error - Maximum Output length has been exceeded by 255

- SAP SCRIPT ERROR: 'Maximum Outout length has been exceeded by 255 by Symbol &SPELL-WORD&.
Any one had same issue .
Thank You,

Hi I have this error in ECC 6.0 but not in 4.6 for the same program..

Firming of order proposals

Hi,
I learnt from the books that the order proposals falling within the PTF are firmed and no automatic changes are done during the planning run. There are 4 firming types. Can you explain from the end user point of view what is firming and how do we do manual firming?
Sridharan

Hi,
Firming Planned Orders and Components
Planned orders created automatically by the planning run are continually adapted to suit changed requirements situations. If you want to prevent the planned orders from these automatic changes, you can firm them. Firmed planned orders are no longer changed by the planning run, that is, the order quantities and order dates are not changed. You can only change firmed planned orders manually.
Firming Planned Orders
When manually creating or changing a planned order, the system automatically proposes the firming indicator. If you do not want to firm the planned order, you can cancel this indicator.
If the planned order has been firmed, the system will no longer make any automatic changes to either quantities or dates in the planned order at material level. However, the components of the planned order material may be adapted if the bill of material has changed.
Firming Components
Any manual changes which you make to the date or the quantity in the planned order are automatically passed on to the components by the system. If you want to ensure that no further automatic changes can be made to the components of the planned order material, you can set the firming indicator for components when processing the planned order. If the firming indicator is set for the components, the planning run will not re-explode the BOM.
The firming indicator is automatically proposed by the system when you manually change or create material components in the processing function of planned orders. The indicator for firming the components can only be set if the planned order is also firmed.
You can also firm individual components to prevent automatic changes to quantities and dates. You set the firming indicator for individual components in the screen for processing components.
Firming Type
The firming type determines how order proposals are to be firmed and scheduled within the planning time fence during the planning run.
The following firming types exist:
Firming type 0:
u2022     Order proposals are not firmed automatically. With this firming type, no firming is carried out, instead, the materials are only provided with the indicator for MPS. Thus, they can be planned in the special planning run for MPS.
Firming type 1:
u2022     Order proposals that move into the planning time fence are firmed automatically as soon as their date lies at least one day before the end date of the planning time fence. The date of new order proposals that are created in the planning time fence is rescheduled out to the end of the planning time fence. Therefore, these new order proposals are not firmed.
Firming type 2:
u2022     Order proposals that move into the planned time fence are firmed automatically so soon as their date lies at least one day before the end date of the planning time fence. Within the planning time fence no order proposals are created by the system.
Firming type 3:
u2022     Order proposals that move into the planning time fence are not firmed automatically. The date of new order proposals, created within the planning time fence is rescheduled out to the end of the planning time fence.
Firming type 4:
u2022     Within the planning time fence, no order proposals are created automatically by the system, that is, the system does not solve the shortage.
Hope it will be Helpful.
Regards,
Vijay.

Troubleshooting Maximum No. of Order Proposals Exceeded

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for