Trunk between Cisco Catalyst and DLINK DES-7210

Hi,
i would like to configure a Trunk with all VLANs between a Cisco Catalyst 3650 an a DLINK DES-7210.
On the DLINK is the def. GW via VRRP defined.
Now i get the following Error:
%ARP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 172.28.72.1 on interface VLAN 72 port TenGigabitEthernet 5/3, sourced by 24e9.b397.2c34
This is the Uplink Interface on the Cisco Switch.
What can cause this?
here`s the config of the Cisco Port:
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
load-interval 30
udld port disable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
end
sh inter trunk
Port        Mode             Encapsulation Status        Native vlan
Te1/1/4     on               802.1q         trunking      1
Port        Vlans allowed on trunk
Te1/1/4     1-4094
Port        Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Te1/1/4     1,8,12,16,20-24,32,36,40,44,48,56,64,68,72,76,80,88,92,96,201,211,239-242,244-249,260,264,268,1212,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1234,1236,1240,1244,1248,1252,1256,1260,1264,1268
Port        Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Te1/1/4     1,8,12,16,20-24,32,36,40,44,48,56,64,68,72,76,80,88,92,96,201,211,239-242,244-249,260,264,268,1212,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1234,1236,1240,1244,1248,1252,1256,1260,1264,1268
and here is the DLINK Switch:
interface TenGigabitEthernet 5/3
switchport mode trunk
description test
sh int ten 5/3 trunk
Interface                Mode   Native VLAN VLAN lists
TenGigabitEthernet 5/3   On     1           ALL

Do you have the same IP configured on both switches ?
Jon

Similar Messages

VLAN trunking from Cisco Catalyst 3750 to Cisco SF300-48P issue and related

Hello expert,
I'm having difficulties to configure VLAN trunking between Cisco Catalyst 3750 switch with Cisco SF300-48P switch and my workstation unable to get any DHCP IP from our DHCP server via Cisco SF300-48P switch. Below is the snippet of configuration on both switches:
[Cisco Catalyst 3750 Switch]
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/45
description NCC-CC-1stFlr
no switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
no switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
spanning-tree portfast
[Cisco SF300-48P Switch]
interface fastethernet48
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 101-103
macro description switch
!next command is internal.
macro auto smartport dynamic_type switch
interface fastethernet29
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 103 tagged
switchport general pvid 103
Are these are correct? Kindly advice!
Thank you very much!
Regards,
Alex

Hi Alex,
for the trunk port on Catalyst on port GE 1/0/45, we need to enable the trunk and for on encapsulation dot1q because this catalyst model is ISL capable also and the SF300 working only with Dot1q Encapsultion
The configuration on catalyst should :
#config terminal
#interface Gi 1/0/45
# switchport encapsulation
#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
#switchport mode trunk
#switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
#spanning-tree portfast
For SF300 the port trunk it looks fine but for the port where the PC should receive an IP address
#interface fastethernet29
#switchport mode access
#switchport ccess vlan 103
Please let me know after this configuration
Thanks
Mehdi
Please rate or mark as answered to help other Cisco Customers

The difference of the IEEE802.1x Auth between Cisco Routers and Catalyst switches

Hello
I am investigating the difference of the IEEE802.1x Auth between Routers and Switches.
Basically dot1x auth is availlable on Catalyst Switches. however if I want to check to
PortBased Multi-Auth , MAC address Auth and any certification Auth with this feature,
Is it possible to integrate into Cisco Router such as Cisco 891F ?
In my opinion Cisco891F is also available to use basic IEEE802.1x but if it compares with Catalyst switches such as Cat3560X
I think there might be any unsupported feature on Cisco 891F.
I appreciate any information. thank you very much in advance.
Best Regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi

Many time in interviews asked comaprison between cisco routers and switches that i was answerless bcoz i dont have much knowledge about that.Can anyone provide me the compariosin sheet of the same.how are the cisco devices differ with each other how much Bandwidth each routres support and Etc...
Ummmm ... The most common question I get is "what is the difference between a router and a switch".
However, if you get a question like this, then my impression to this line of questioning are:
1. The candidate they are looking for has in-depth knowledge of routers and switches. And I mean IN-DEPTH!;
2. They are not looking for a candidate. They just want to stroke their ego. There is not alot of people who can give you the "names and numbers" of routers and switches at a snap of a finger. And if you do happen to know the answer, then and there, then expect a tougher follow-up question.

Sip trunk between CUCM7.0 and third party VOIP provider

Hi all,
I'm looking for a solution/howto configuration for setting up a SIP trunk between CUCM7.0 and a SIP-VoIP provider.
Got SIP username, password and SIP-proxy IP from the provider.
I've done such a setup on CUCME a couple of times, but never on the CUCM.
Who can put me on right way?
Can it be done on the CUCM, or must an IOS-Device be used (got a PSTN-GW connected through H323 with CUCM)?
THanks for the hint,
Greets Norbert

Here we go.....
CONFIG (Version=7.1)
=====================
Version 7.1
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express
! Calling nr. incoming
voice translation-rule 40
rule 1 /\(.*\)/ /0\1/
! Discard prefix (calling nr.)
voice translation-rule 190
rule 1 /^0\(.*\)/ /\1/
rule 2 /^9\(.*\)/ /\1/
! Mapping, internat to external nr.
voice translation-rule 191
rule 10 /^[1-9].*/ /xxxxEXTERNALxxxx/
! for call-forwarding
rule 15 /^0\(.*\)/ /\1/
! Mapping external to internal nr.
voice translation-rule 192
rule 2 /^xxxxxEXTERNALxxxx/ /4xx/
voice translation-profile TP_IN_SIP
translate calling 40
translate called 192
voice translation-profile TP_OUT_SIP
translate calling 191
translate called 190
dial-peer voice 2001 voip
corlist outgoing dialCORnoFax
description *** SIP-TRUNK (OUT) ***
translation-profile incoming TP_IN_SIP
translation-profile outgoing TP_OUT_SIP
max-conn 2
destination-pattern 9.T
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
session transport udp
! customer external nr. range (one dot at the and -> 0-9)
incoming called-number xxxxxxxx.
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
codec g711alaw
no vad
gateway
timer receive-rtp 1200
sip-ua
keepalive target ipv4:2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
authentication username xxEXTERNAL NR.xxxxx password 7 111111111111111111111
calling-info pstn-to-sip from number set xxEXTERNAL NR.xxxxx
retry invite 2
retry response 2
retry bye 2
retry register 2
retry options 1
registrar ipv4:2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx expires 60
host-registrar
Greets,
Norbert
Hope this help......Please rate if helpful

Routing issue between Cisco Nexus and Cisco 4510 R+E Chassis

We have configured Cisco Nexus 7K9 as core and Cisco 4510 R+E as access switches for Server connectivity.
We are experiencing problem in terms of ARP learning and Ping issues between Cisco Nexus and end hosts.

Hi,
So you have N7k acting as L3 with servers connected to 4510?.
Do you see the MAC associated with failing ARP in 4510?. Is it happening with all or few servers?. Just to verify if it is connectivity issue between N7k and 4510, you can configure an SVI on 4510 and assign address from same raneg (server/core range) and perform a ping.
This will help narrow down if issue is between server to 4510 or 4510 to N7k.
Thanks,
Nagendra

Mobility between Cisco WLC and Meraki(other vendor)

Is it possible that users can roam between Cisco WLC and other vendor wireless gear? Meraki keeps saying it is possible.
They keep saying it is a IEEE feature and everone should support but I do not understand how?

While theoretically possible with the adoption of capwap, it would require all the manufacturers to follow the specs exactly the same. Kind of like hearding cats, not impossible, but highly unlikely.. That's just my opinion
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

VPN between cisco WRVS4400N and EdgeMarc

Hi Experts
Please help me.
Is it possible to create VPN between cisco WRVS4400N and EdgeMarc appliance.
Regards,
Ejaz

Hi Ejaz
I don't expect any cisco folks that answer this community to be expert on EdgeMarc, but i may be wrong..
We employ a open standard IPSec implementation.
Here is the open source document that relates to the RV220W.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv220w/open_source/OSD_RV220W_78-19892-02.pdf
The question could have been, have you asked EsgeMarc if they wiork with open standard based IPSec implemations on our routers.
I would prefer you look at the RV220W if possible, which is a relatively young product.
I am guessing since you can source a product from Disti, try one and see if it works.
The beauty of buying from a Cisco Disti Partner, is they they have a returns policy. Check out that policy, if you wish and keep the packaging and try out your application.
Answered a question with someone trying to form a IPSec link to a OEM firewall/ IPSec gateway ..it worked. so give your application a try
regards Dave.

Difference between Cisco DCNM and CISCO Fabric Manager

Hello Everyone,
I am new to Cisco SAN and just would like to know the differences between cisco DCNM and Cisco Fabric manager and which one is latest as of now.
regards
VINAY

Hi Viany,
Fabric Manager was renamed DCNM starting at 5.2.
Fabric Manager only monitors SAN Fabrics, while DCNM 5.2 and above can monitor both SAN Fabrics and Ethernet LANs.
Regards,
David

Conecting etherchannel between cisco catalyst 6509 and hp procourve 9308

Impossible to connet 2 ports 1000base sx agrouped via etherchannel / lacp or pagp between a catalyst 6509 and a hp procourve 9308. Please do you know he best configuration? thanks in advance

Hola Luis,
the link would have to be LACP (since PAgP is Cisco proprietary). So, on the Cisco side, the config should look like this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
channel-group 1 mode on
interface Port-channel1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
On the HP side, check how the trunk group is configured there. I assume you have used the ´trunk deploy´ command after configuring the HP trunk group ? Also, which spanning-tree mode do you have running on the Cisco and the HP ?
Saludos,
GP

Routing issue between Cisco device and Virtual machine

Hi Guys,
We have two local subnets in a virtualized environment, subnet 1 has a VM operating as a firewall, we would like all traffic for subnet 2 to go via VM on subnet 1, this will police traffic on subnet 2 and then reroute.
The infrastructure involved comprises,
Internet Edge Switch -> ASA -> Core Switch -> IBM Flex chassis
The Internet edge switch is directly connected between the ISP routers and the Cisco ASA firewall pair (A/S). The ASA is then connected to the Core switch. Connected from the core switch is an IBM Flex chassis, via a port channel (all vlans allowed)
The local subnets in question are as follows:
Vlan 101 (10.1.1.0/24)
Vlan 102 (10.2.1.0/24)
The VM in question has two NIC cards having IP address of both subnets.
NIC 1: 10.1.1.1
NIC 2: 10.2.1.1
We would like packets destined for 10.2.1.1 to land on 10.1.1.1 IP address. At the moment traffic for each vlan routes from the outside to their respective local subnets successfully, what we are having difficulty with is directing traffic for subnet 2 via subnet 1 VM firewall.
At the moment we have tried adding a static route on the core switch but it didn’t work
ip route 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.1
I will appreciate if you could share your knowledge and guide me how to achieve this goal.
Thanks in advance :-)

Hi,
I think for this to work you need a transit vlan between the VMs and the core switch. So, if you have 2 vlans on the VM (101 and 102) you use the VM switch to route between the vlans and in order to go outside the local vlans you would use the core switch. In this scenario you would not have an SVI (layer-3) interface on the core. The only thing that core will have is the layer-2 vlans (101 and102). You would than need a static route on the core switch to point to the transit vlan on the VM side.
so, for example, if the transit vlan is vlan 110 and the ip is 192.168.1.0/24
on the core you have static routes:
ip route 10.1.1.0/24 192.168.1.2 (VM side)
ip route 10.1.2.0/24 192.168.1.2 (VM side)
You also need an SVI for vlan 110 with ip address 192.168.1.1/24 on the core.
on the VM you need a default route to point to the core (192.168.1.1).
Is this what you are trying to do?
HTH

Communication problem between Cisco 3560 and Cisco SG300.

Dear Support,
I have a Cisco SG300 and Cisco 3560 switches.
3560 is my Core Switch and SG300 is access switch.
From 3560 VLAN information is not passed to SG300.
3560 Configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,10,11
switchport mode trunk
SG300 Configuration:
interface gigabitethernet49
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 2,10-11 tagged
macro description switch
Please suggest how this issue is resolve.
Regards,
JItesh Mahajan.

Dear Aleksandra,
Below Configuration is right or wrong for 3560 and SG300.
3560 Configuration:
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove VLAN 1
switchport native vlan 1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,10,11
switchport mode trunk
SG300 Configuration:
interface gigabitethernet49
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 2,10-11 tagged
macro description switch
Regards,
JItesh Mahajan.

Is there any documentation to deploy federation between Cisco IM and presence and Lync 2010 sister companies?

Hello All,
Company A – Using Cisco IM and Presence
Company B – Using Microsoft Lync 2010
We would like to establish federation between Company A and Company B and also looking for the documentation which has the step by step instruction.
Please let us know overall steps or provide us the documentation. Thank you in advance.
Thanks

For Federation between Lync and Cisco IM, you can check below link and this
document
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/im_presence/interdomain_federation/9_0_1/CUP0_BK_IAAE17D8_00_integration-guide-interdomain-federation-90/CUP0_BK_IAAE17D8_00_integration-guide-interdomain-federation-90_chapter_01.html
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Inline Posture between Cisco ISE and Wireless LAN Controller

Hi,
I was looking into Cisco ISE solution for deploying NAC.
I have a question about the network topology.
In the user guide documents of cisco ISE, it is written that for Wireless LAN Controllers (WLC) and VPN devices, an additional server, Inline Posture, is needed.
However, in the following integration document, there is not an inline posture between WLC and Cisco ISE server.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-18121
I want to know if Inline Posture is a requirement, if not a requirement, what are the benefits of having it between Cisco ISE Server and WLC.
Thanks & Regards
Sinan

Hello,
Please go through below mentioned links which might be helpful for you.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/installation_guide/ise_deploy.html
Best Regards,

GRE IPSec between Cisco 2811 and FortiGate 110C

Hello,
Does anybody know if it is possible to configure GRE IPSec tunnel between Cisco 2811 router and FortiGate 110C firewall? I know that FortiGate supports IPSec and GRE tunnels, but maybe somebody succeeded in establishing an IPSec GRE between those routers? Could you also give a link to the appropriate documentation if it is possible?

Hi,
You can configure the GRE tunnel on the 2811.
I'm aware that you can configure sort of a GRE tunnel on the Fortinet as well, but I have not seen a GRE tunnel between a Cisco and other vendor.
I've only seen GRE tunnels between Cisco devices (however I have not tried it to assure you that it will not work :-()
Federico.

VLAN and STP compitability between Cisco 2950 and SRW2048

How Cisco 2950 and Linksys SRW2048 switches can be combined to work fine with more than one VLAN's and STP?? I want both switches to support three VLAN's and STP for loop free network.Can some body help me out to combine linksys and cisco switches to interconnect to form my Network???

I believe that the SRW2048 is a 48 port managed switch. The easiest way to set the VLAN and STP configuration of is to access the web utility of this switch via 192.168.1.254. You have to go to VLAN Management and he needs to create the VLANs. The default VLAN of the switch is VLAN 1. You need to create 2 more VLANs by choosing the VLAN IDs and the name you want for these VLANs.
After creating the VLANS, you need to determine the LAN of the switch you want to assign to each VLAN and the Trunk port or the port where you need to connect the SRW2048 to the Cisco 2950 switch. Go to the port setting and make this port as “truck”, and leave the other ports as “access”. Go to VLAN to ports and manually allocate the each LAN ports to the desired VLAN ID number. Take note that all ports that are members of VLAN1 should be “untagged” and the rest should be “tagged”. Save the settings you made.
The STP configuration for the SRW2048 can be found also in the web utility. Just go to the Spanning Tree tab and setup your desired STP configuration.
For the Cisco 2950, I am not quite sure on how to create these settings but I saw a useful link that might help you:
http://www.petri.co.il/csc_setup_a_vlan_on_a_cisco_switch.htm

Trunk between Cisco Catalyst and DLINK DES-7210

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for