Trunking Cisco CUCM 9.0 with UCS 500

In one of our branch offices use Cisco UCS-500 for local IP telephony and PRI. Now we would like to integrate this system to our main offices so that we dial all the 4-digit extensions.
Is it possible to trunk Cisco UCS 500 with CUCM 9.0. ?

Hi
Seems you have codec negotiation problem when you are making calls from UCS to CUCM
. Can you post your UCS config here.
Maybe you have logging buffered enabled on your UCS as a result of which logs are not displayed on screen over telent session.
Regards
Aditya Gupta

Similar Messages

Cisco Professional Configuration Issue with SG 500 52P

I have a new SG500-52P switch installed for a small business and am upgrading to a Cisco 2910 router this weekend. I am trying to view the new switch on CCPE but it keeps saying that the device is undiscoverable. I have HTTP and HTTPS enabled on the switch. Is this switch able to be used with CCPE? It is not a requirement because the web interface does work when I manually log on to the switch, but I was wanting to use CCPE for the router and switch if possible.

hi have you made sure that you have trunked for all vlans on your trunk links as i had a similar issue because i only trunked for one vlan on the link thinking that it would trunk for all by putting the link into trunk mode?

Mitel System With Trunk To CUCM DTMF Not Recognized.

Hello,
Not sure if this is correct forum but maybe someone has seen this. Overview is that DTMF is not being recognized by CVP from the greeting. Call flow is such.
Mitel 5000 --siptrunk---CUCM9---siptrunk---CVP9
Currently the DTMF type on all trunks is RFC2833. And verified the Mitel is RFC as well. I think the problem is that for payload Mitel is sending 96. But on the Cisco CUCM the trunks are using the default of 101 for both the trunk to Mitel and CVP. Here is the invite in from Mitel you can see it sends payload of 96.
INVITE sip:[email protected]:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.254.20.32:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2312043656-10065
Max-Forwards: 70
Allow: NOTIFY,REGISTER,REFER,SUBSCRIBE,INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE
User-Agent: Mitel-5000-ICP-5.1.0.56
P-Asserted-Identity: "Laura B." <sip:[email protected]>
From: "Laura B." <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=Mitel-5000_2312043669-10065
To: 72799 <sip:[email protected]:5060>
Call-ID: 2312043591-10065
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: "Laura B." <sip:[email protected]:5060>
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 266
v=0
o=Mitel-5000-ICP 169457268 1404250460 IN IP4 10.254.20.31
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 10.254.20.31
t=0 0
m=audio 6770 RTP/AVP 0 8 96
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000
a=ptime:20
a=maxptime:30
a=cdsc:1 image udptl t38
5:16 PM
here is 200 ok
5:16 PM
5:16 PM
Jay Schulze:
SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.254.20.32:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2312043656-10065
From: "." <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=Mitel-5000_2312043669-10065
To: 72799 <sip:[email protected]:5060>;tag=10585346~dfbf10b3-6c69-4443-852f-cbf609935a6f-42551743
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 21:34:24 GMT
Call-ID: 2312043591-10065
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY
Allow-Events: presence, kpml
Supported: replaces
Supported: X-cisco-srtp-fallback
Supported: Geolocation
P-Preferred-Identity: <sip:[email protected]>
Remote-Party-ID: <sip:[email protected]>;party=called;screen=no;privacy=off
Contact: <sip:[email protected]:5060>
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 238
v=0
o=CiscoSystemsCCM-SIP 10585346 1 IN IP4 10.38.246.136
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 10.38.246.166
b=TIAS:64000
b=AS:64
t=0 0
m=audio 23956 RTP/AVP 0 96
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=ptime:20
a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:96 0-15
This is the invite over to CVP. Still sending 96. I'm pretty sure I can fix this by setting the payload type to 96 on both trunks on CUCM. I was able to test with it afterhours. After reading through Mitel docs there is no way to change payload type on their side. The question is really would there be anything else this could maybe break on the CVP side?

Well that did not work. What I found was it was going through 96 all the way to CVP. However when CVP returned a label to the VXML. The VXML sent back the 200 OK with 101.
If I changed the the rtp payload-type nte 96 on the VXML dial-peer it did work. However it broke any other call flow to CVP from being able to recognize DTMF.
I wonder if this is some type of bug on VXML. Because it was my understanding by having the command 'asymmetric payload full' under SIP. It would pass the payload type from one call leg to the other.

How to create multiple sip trunks between cucm and cisco unified sip proxy

Dear Expert,
Is there a way to create multiple sip trunks between CUCM and Cisco Unified SIP Proxy (CUSP)? How to achieve it without creating multiple IP interfaces on the CUSP module.
CUCM: 8.5.1.10000-9
CUSP: 8.5.2
Thank you,
.wan

Hello Michael,
This SIP trunk is part of UCCE solution, which used between CVP, CUSP, and CUCM.
The requirements:
1) To have different codecs for different type of calls, as the phones are at few countries
2) To pass different number of digits from CUSP to CUCM for different call treatments
.wan

Integration Lync 2013 Online (Cloud) with Cisco CUCM 9.1

HI
First i Don't have a physical or virtual Lync server in my network,
Do i have any chance to migrate with my Cisco CUCM 9.1
Thanks.
Ahmed Elshalh

Lync online won't support back-end integration with CUCM on prem. But if looking to try client side integration, Cisco's CUCI supports Lync online.
CUCI: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/unified-communications/uc-integration-tm-microsoft-lync/index.html
O365 support: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucimoc/8_6/cucimocReleaseNote8_6.html#wp363808
Keep in mind CUCI is a Cisco supported solution and not a Microsoft one, also CUCI disables most of the Lync client functionality.
Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
Blog
Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

Integration of CUCM 8.5 with Microsoft Lync 2010 issues

Hi All,
We have integrated CUCM 8.5 with Microsoft Lync 2010 (both Mediation and front end server on Virtual machine on same location) on lab environment, and which is working perfectly on both ways (Two way calls with no issues). But, when we tried configuring the same on live environment, we have no two ways calling between Lync client and IP phone endpoints. Our Mediation and front server are in U.S and CUCM 8.5 cluster are in India and lync clients are in India region, connected via MPLS link and all the traffic ports are open. The following are the configuration on both sides:
CUCM side:
•- Created Direct SIP trunk with MTP enabled.
•- Assigned Mediation server IP address to Port 5068.
•- TCP enabled
LYNC Side:
•- Followed the steps from Cisco Lync integration document through cisco website.
Are they any other configuration requires, when the servers are in different location?

You configure the CUCILync client as a shared line. You then tell the CUCILync client what to control either the desk phone or use the CUCILync client itself. When CUCILync controls the phone it is not registered in CUCM. CUCILYNC will still give a screen POP when the desk phone is controlled.

Cisco CUCM 6.1.5 CodeYellowExit alarm(s) received

Hi,
I am running Cisco CUCM ver.6.1.5 & two CUCMs acting as Publisher & Subscriber, Total Phones registered on CUCM is 94.
The Problem that I am facing i used to receive the below Alarm & I noticed the CPU is hitting 85% on both CUCMs so I found the Process called CCM is utilizing 80% of CPU usage.
From Tue Feb 23 23:38:05 AST 2010 to Tue Feb 23 23:59:05 AST 2010 on node 172.30.145.4, there are 1 CodeYellowEntry alarm(s) and 1 CodeYellowExit alarm(s) received. On Tue Feb 23 23:58:35 AST 2010, the last CodeYellowEntry alarm generated: CodeYellowEntry AverageDelay : 31 EntryLatency : 20 ExitLatency : 8 SampleSize : 10 TotalCodeYellowEntry : 26 HighPriorityQueueDepth : 0 NodeID : CUCM-A
Note:
I had disabled all Traces for all CUCM types but still the problem exist.
I had enough MEM & CPU.
Please Advice !!!
Best Regards,
Mohanad

Did you recreate your whole cluster, just as it is in production, on UCS???
I did the procedure from 6.1(5) and 7.1(5) and had no problems.
HTH
java
if this helps, please rate
www.cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

What is the procedure of Call Manager upgrade from version CUCM 7.1 (MCS Server) to version CUCM 10.2 (on UCS server)

Hi
What is the procedure of Call Manager upgrade from version CUCM 7.1 (MCS Server) to version CUCM 10.2 (on UCS server) , please let me know the steps to what would be the backup procedures and upgrades.
Regards
Gaurav

I'd suggest reading this guide to make sure you have prepared your environment to support 10.x first. The link below also contains the upgrade path to 10.0(1).
One of the ways you can do this is:
1/ Apply refresh upgrade cop file on all servers in cluster.
2/ Upgrade the cluster to 8.6(2). Take a backup of the cluster.
3/ Build a cluster of 8.6(2) servers on VMs, and assign them the same hostnames and IP address as the hardware cluster. (You may need to keep these on a separate network until switching off the hardware machines)
4/ Restore the backup taken from the hardware cluster on to the VM cluster.
5/ Upgrade VM cluster to 10.0(1).
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/upgrade/10_0_1/CUCM_BK_U4214F9D_00_upgrade-guide-cucm-100/CUCM_BK_U4214F9D_00_upgrade-guide-cucm-100_chapter_010.html#CUCM_RF_UA60AFAB_00

ISCSI storage with UCS

Hi All,
Can i ask a question with regards to connecting iSCSI storage to use with UCS. We are looking at using Nimble storage which is iSCSI based & want to understand best practise recommendations on how to connect it to UCS to get the best level of performance & reliability/ resilience etc.
Another question is more around how VMware deals with loss of connectivity to one path (where dual connections are setup, from storage to fabrics), would it re-route traffic to running path?
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Kassim

Hello Kassim,
Currently Nimble iSCSI storage is certified with UCS 2.0.3 firmware version.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/interoperability/matrix/r_hcl_B_rel2.03.pdf
The following guide can serve as reference.
Cisco Desktop Virtualization Solution with Nimble Storage Reference Architecture
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns836/ns978/guide_c07-719522.pdf
In above setup, ESXi software iSCSi multipathing with PSP Round Robin algorithm is implemented to take to care of load balancing IO and failover with dual paths.
HTH
Padma

Cisco Twinax Cables Compatibiltiy with EMC VNX/VNXe

Hi,
I would like to know about Cisco Twinax Cables Compatibiltiy with EMC VNX/VNXe series storage - for connectivity between UCS Fabric Interconnect and EMC VNX/VNXe.
Are the following Cisco Twinax Cables compatible with EMC's VNX and VNXe serie platforms:
SFP-H10GB-CU1M= 1-m 10G SFP+ Twinax cable assembly, passive
SFP-H10GB-CU3M= 3-m 10G SFP+ Twinax cable assembly, passive
SFP-H10GB-CU5M= 5-m 10G SFP+ Twinax cable assembly, passive
SFP-H10GB-ACU7M= 7-m 10G SFP+ Twinax cable assembly, active
SFP-H10GB-ACU10M= 10-m 10G SFP+ Twinax cable assembly, active
Kindly advice. Thanks.

Hi,
I'd like to confirm you, that passive assembly is supported. Haven't tried the actives one yet.
I'm using UCS-B200 M3, and EMC VNX 5300.
the EMC VNX5300 (Block Level) connected using 2 type of media. Copper (SFP-H10GB-CU5M= 5-m 10G SFP+ Twinax cable assembly, passive) and Fiber Channel 8 GB directly info Fabric Interconnect 6248 ports.
For old server the connection is via iSCSI 10GB Copper. and for UCS-B200 M3 is via FC 8GB.
All my configuration is running well.
Hope thats helped.
Thanks,
Pieter

Cisco CUCM NTP documentation/requirements

Hello all,
Just wondering about the "actual" NTP clock Stratum version requirements when
installing Cisco CUCM. As the three sources below show varying results;
So first we have the install guides;
Note
Cisco recommends that you use an external NTP server to ensure accurate system time on the first node. Ensure the external NTP server is stratum 9 or higher (meaning stratums 1-9). Subsequent nodes in the cluster will get their time from the first node.When you are installing Cisco Unity Connection on a virtual machine, you must specify an external NTP server.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/install/8_6_1/install/cmins861.html#wp804989
Then the SRND;
Unified CM automatically synchronizes the NTP time of all subscribers in the cluster to the publisher. During installation, each subscriber is automatically configured to point to an NTP server running on the publisher. The publisher considers itself to be a master server and provides time for the cluster based on its internal hardware clock unless it is configured to synchronize from an external server. Cisco highly recommends configuring the publisher to point to a Stratum-1, Stratum-2, or Stratum-3 NTP server to ensure that the cluster time is synchronized with an external time source.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/8x/netstruc.html#wpxref14097
And finally the NTP White Paper;
For Cisco Unified CallManager Versions 5.0 and later:
– Manual configuration of the ntpd.conf file is not allowed.
– Cisco Unified CallManager prompts the administrator to specify the external NTP server at publisher installation and automatically populates the ntpd.conf file on the publisher server.
– The ntpd.conf files of all other cluster servers are automatically configured to point to the publisher as the NTP source.
• Configure the publisher to point to a traceable stratum 1 clock source.
• Configure network latency between the publisher and the dedicated clock source so that it is within 40 milliseconds round-trip time (RTT).
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/voicesw/ps6788/vcallcon/ps556/prod_white_paper0900aecd8037fdb5.html
Thanks for any light you can shed on this.
Cheers!
Rob
"Spend your life waiting,
for a moment that just don't come,
Well, don't waste your time waiting"
-Springsteen

Leo,
Do you have reference for this.
Still murky waters:
In 9.1 release Stratum 5 no longer enforced.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/9_1_1/CUCM_BK_RD7D4696_00_cucm-release-notes-911a/CUCM_BK_RD7D4696_00_release-notes-for-cisco-unified_chapter_0110.html
External NTP Server Requirements
The procedure "Set up first node" has been updated to remove the requirement that the external NTP server be Stratum 5 or higher. When you configure the first node, Cisco recommends configuring the publisher to point to a Stratum 1, Stratum 2, or Stratum 3 NTP server to ensure that the cluster time is synchronized with an external time source.

CUCM 8x compatibility with UCCX 7x

Quick Question: Is CUCM 8x compatible with UCCX 7x. It does NOT appear so looking at the UCCX compatibility matrix:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
Currently have CUCM 7.1.3.32900-4 with UCCX 7.0(1)SR05_Build504 - Moving to CUCM 8x (probably 8.1) 1st Qtr 2011. Want to maintain UCCX on 7x. Is this possible/compatible ? Can someone confirm and if you have experience any gotchas to share is greatly appreciate.

Hi
Thats correct UCCX 7.x is not compatible with CUCM 8.x version.
UCCX talks to CUCM with the help of JTAPI protocol, Every major release of CUCM has a different version of JTAPI which UCCX downloads from CUCM when JTAPI sync is performed.
Unfortunately the JTAPI version of CUCM 8.x is not tested with UCCX 7.x version thus its not present in compatability matrix. UCCX 8.x which is out supports CUCM 8.x Also UCCX 7.0(2) which will be coming out later this year or early next year might have the support for 8.x - not sure on that though
Hope this helps
Anuj

Cisco SSL-VPN / webvpn with Cisco 2901 IOS 15.3.3M

Dear Community,
I have a strange issue that I am hoping some of you will be able to assist with.
I am running an environment with the following specifications
Cisco ISR G2 2901 with IOS 15.3.3M
Security Licence enabled
Data Licence enabled
VPN Licence enabled
Cisco ISR G2 2951 with IOS 15.3.3M
Security Licence enabled
Data Licence enabled
SM with ESX server.
Desktop Environment
Windows XP SP3
Internet Explorer 8
Desktop Environment 2
Windows 8
Internet Explorer 10
I have a ESX server set up with a web page on the 2951. The 2901 unit has a SSL VPN / web vpn service set up on it to allow the Desktop Environments to connect to the 2951 web page. The Desktop Environments are not allowed to directly connect to the 2951 router that is why the SSL-VPN / web vpn is used.
This system was initially working with IOS 15.2.4M2 however an update of the IOS was required and now the VPN does not fully function correctly.
PROBLEM: Now the webvpn interface loads with the welcome screen and login. After logging in it has a screen with a link to the webpage on the 2951. When I try open this webpage on the 2951 and the SSL-VPN starts to build I only get half my web page. There seems to be a problem where I only get half a page loading or just a blank page with just HTML headers. I have tried changing the page to just HTML but it still does not display properly. This is with Internet Explorer ( all versions ). With firefox there are no problems but I cannot run this browser as my environment will not allow it.
If anyone can assit me here it would really make my day.
Thanks,
Will

Can anyone help with this ?

Hi i was wondering can i buy a macbook pro 13 inch. with a 500 GB hardrive that costs 50 dollers more im gonna buy the one that costs 1200 dollers anyone who can help me? i know that can do it online but i was wondering can i buy it like that at the store

hi i was wondering can i buy a macbook pro 13 inch. with a 500 GB hardrive that costs 50 dollers more im gonna buy the one that costs 1200 dollers anyone who can help me? i know that can do it online but i was wondering can i buy it like that at the store

anton93 wrote:
hi i was wondering can i buy a macbook pro 13 inch. with a 500 GB hardrive that costs 50 dollers more im gonna buy the one that costs 1200 dollers anyone who can help me? i know that can do it online but i was wondering can i buy it like that at the store
Call the store & ask them!

Update to Excel 2013 causing a problem with Sage 500 ERP import feature

I work in an accounting office that relies heavily on importing data from Excel into Sage 500 ERP accounting software. We recently began updating from Office 2007 to Office 2013. Now we are running into a
huge hurdle as we find Excel 2013 no longer supports MDI, and has moved exclusively to SDI. This is a problem for us, and here's why.
Sage 500 has a "Data Porter" command which launches Excel, but opens a blank workbook in Excel. After triggering the Data Porter, we open a previously saved Excel workbook containing our data, select the "Add-Ins"
tab, and click the appropriate button to begin the import. In Excel 2007 this works because the workbook with the data opens in the same "window" as the blank workbook.
In Excel 2013, the workbook containing the data can only be opened in it's own new window which has not established the line of communication with Sage 500's Data Porter, and the import function is not available.
So far the only workaround we have found is to right-click on a tab in the file containing the data, click "Select All Sheets," then "Move or Copy" them to the new blank workbook. The import into Sage 500 is successful when
we do that. However, we need to save the workbook with the updated import information returned by Sage 500, so we must also do a "Save As" for the new workbook, assigning the same file name as the original data file, overwriting
it. This makes what used to be a simple procedure quite cumbersome, and we fear the risk of data loss may be significant.
Is there any way to make this process work the way it does in earlier versions of Excel that support MDI (Multiple Document Interface)?

Is there any way to make this process work the way it does in earlier versions of Excel that support MDI (Multiple Document Interface)?
At a glance, it seems the answer might be...No.
Note
There is no MDI compatibility option in Excel 2013.
From: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/dn251093.aspx
You should contact Sage, to see if they have solutions/suggestions, but I think it will require Sage to re-develop the Dataporter Add-in ?
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Trunking Cisco CUCM 9.0 with UCS 500

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for