Trying to config a Dlink 655 router with a ActionTec

Hello-
I have the FIOS Triple Play Internet/TV/Phone). I desperately want to upgrade to Wireless N and run 1GB hard wired connections to my internal network. Is there any way to do this? It seems that I am stuck using the ActionTec router supplied by Verizon, does anyone know of verizon coming out with a router that will support both 1GB and Wireless N? Sounds to good to be true! Unfrotunately one thing is is stopping me from installing the Dlink 655 is that I have coax cable coming in from the outside box supplied by Verizon.

I use a Dlink DGL4500 with my Actiontec. It is basically the same a a DIR-655.
I have the WAN port of my DLINK connected to the Actiontec. Then I set up a DMZ in the Actiontec for my DLINK router. The Actiontec assigned 192.168.1.2 for my Dlink so I assigned that IP address to the DMZ. Then the Dlink has full access to the internet without the Actiontec interfering. And you just use the DLink like you normally would. I have my wireless turned off in my Actiontec and only use my Dlink for wireless N and G. And my 36+ devices are all connected through my Dlink on my home network. Of course the FIOS STB still gets it's info from the Actiontec over MoCA. But I have been using my Actiontec this way for over 13 months now. First with A Dlink DGL4300 and now with my Dlink 4500.

Similar Messages

H323 static Nat doesn't work fine on 3900 series router with IOS 15.2(3) T

Hi,
I have a problem with static nat setting on my 3925 router with IOS15.2(3). The scenario is like this:
I set a static nat between 172.16.1.2 and x.x.x.x(public IP address) using following command:
ip nat inside source static 172.16.1.2 x.x.x.x
The intranet IP address is set on a video conference system from Huawei, after setting all these things, ping works fine to this public IP address, but video conference cannot be built. I tried same setting using another 2811 router with IOS12.4 and it worked fine. Which means the problem should be isolated to this 3925 router. Full config is also attached, sorry that I elimated the public IP address and use other characters instead.
Additionally, I debugged ip natting and I see following information when making video calls:
router#debug ip nat h323
IP NAT H323 debugging is on
router#
*Jul 10 09:11:07.343: NAT[0]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
*Jul 10 09:11:07.343: [NAT[0]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
*Jul 10 09:16:15.731: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
*Jul 10 09:16:15.731: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
*Jul 10 09:16:57.215: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
*Jul 10 09:16:57.215: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
*Jul 10 09:17:02.731: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
*Jul 10 09:17:02.731: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
*Jul 10 09:17:14.731: NAT[1]: H323: received pak, payload_len=0
*Jul 10 09:17:14.731: [NAT[1]: H323 ACK packet ? FALSE
This problem has been bothering me for weeks. Hope that someone could help me out. Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Angran

Hi,
i have the same requirement for a customer, not for video but for audio calls, i have a remote office with h.323 phones and they need to get registered to a gk in central office to send and recieve voice calls, did you make it work? can you share the config please?

I am trying to connect a Windows 7 / 64 bit to an Epson printer on my Mac. The printer is hooked into the Mac via USB; the Mac is networked to a Linksys wireless router with an ethernet cable, as is the Windows box. Any tips on how to do this?

I am trying to connect a Windows 7 / 64 bit to an Epson printer on my Mac. The printer is hooked into the Mac via USB; the Mac is networked to a Linksys wireless router with an ethernet cable, as is the Windows box. I installed the current Bonjour printer services software on the Windows machine, and separately installed the driver software for the Epson printer on the WIndows machine. Running the bonjour wizard, I get an alert saying 'I don't have sufficient access to my computer to connect to the selected printer'.
The printer has 'sharing' turned on from the Mac end; this works with a Powerbook via the wireless connection. Sharing is also turned on in the Windows printer control panel for this printer (under properties). The Mac is a G5 running 10.5.8. When I try to print a page from the Windows machine it gets hung in the print queue.
Any advice how to proceed would be appreciated!
thx,

I am trying to connect a Windows 7 / 64 bit to an Epson printer on my Mac. The printer is hooked into the Mac via USB; the Mac is networked to a Linksys wireless router with an ethernet cable, as is the Windows box. I installed the current Bonjour printer services software on the Windows machine, and separately installed the driver software for the Epson printer on the WIndows machine. Running the bonjour wizard, I get an alert saying 'I don't have sufficient access to my computer to connect to the selected printer'.
The printer has 'sharing' turned on from the Mac end; this works with a Powerbook via the wireless connection. Sharing is also turned on in the Windows printer control panel for this printer (under properties). The Mac is a G5 running 10.5.8. When I try to print a page from the Windows machine it gets hung in the print queue.
Any advice how to proceed would be appreciated!
thx,

Computer tend to freeze when accessing internet with D-Link dir-655 router

I recently bought a D-Link dir-655 router and since then my computer tend to freeze up completely when accessing internet. This also happens when certain programs access internet. Otherwise I am usually using Internet Explorer or Opera.
I've found that there are many who experience problems with D-Link router, that they may have problems with certain network card. Anyone who can say if this is a known issues and if it there is a solution or if it is better to buy another router?
Model #: HPE-140sc
Product #: WC779AA-UUW
Software-version#: A1PNv6PrA2
PCBRAND: Pavilion

Hi, Ernst:
Would you consider backing up your files and doing a system recovery?
Maybe the OS has some corrupt registry files or something.
If you recover and then it still does that, your only choice looking at the motherboard is a PCIe gigabit ethernet adapter which would be relatively easy to install, or you could even get a USB ethernet adapter and not even have to open the case.
See if there is a setting to disable the onboard NIC if you have to add a network card.
I would rule out all software problems before buying hardware.
If you want to try some other malware program, I recommend the free Kapersky rescue disk. You burn the file to a CD and boot from it. It scans the drive and deletes any malware or virus files it finds without the PC being in windows. A lot of times viruses and malware can't be removed when windows is running.
Link to the download and instuctions for use is below. I like to use the graphic interface rather than the text interface.
http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208282173
Paul

Trying to get a WRT54GX2 wireless router working with a W...

Trying to get a WRT54GX2 wireless router working with a WPC54G wireless card. The laptop and desktop both will access the Internet and work when hardwired through the router's Ethernet ports. When trying to access wireless, the Laptop shows to be connected to the router and also to Internet, but Internet Explorer can not access any websites. Suggestions? Thanks.

what ip address does the laptop get ?? ensure that the laptop is not set for a static ip add....and it gets an ip add from the router ..

Tried about:config does not owrk now NEWTAB facebook/twitter etc.list is my startpage and comes up with every tab PLEASE how do I disable this awful newtab

I want to get rid of the newtab as my start page (homepage selected in options, but does not pan out)
and it comes up with every link. I tried about :config/ about:newtab to about:blank. now it is WORSE because it is now the homepage too.

Go to about:config, and search for 'newtab'. On 'browser.newtab.url', set the value to about:newtab. This is the default value.
If this doesn't work, try resetting Firefox. All of your data will be saved, and Firefox will be reset to the defaults. [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]]

Replacing a wired DLink router with a Linksys WRT310N

Hi folks,
I am planning this move and I'd appreciate your opinions.
Currently, I have a wired, DLink DI 604, with a cable modem, 4 computers (1 XP desktop + 3 Vista notebooks ) on the network. Everything is OK. I purchased a Linksys WRT310N and want to remove the DLink and install WRT310N.
Current IP of DLink is 192.168.0.1 and all 4 computers work at IPs like 192.168.0.XXX.
My question relates to the Linksys default IP address 192.168.1.1.
If I just replace the routers, the network won't work.
I am considering:
a) change the IP address of the new Linksys router to 192.168.0.1 - this way, I hope computers will see the net /Internet immediately. The inconvenince, as I see it, is that any future "resetting" will take the router again to 192.168.1.1;
or, b) Leave the Linksys at 192.168.1.1 and try to configure each one of the 4 computers to work with this new router address (ipconfig release/ renew on each computer? is that it?) .
c) Is there a 3rd option, better, and foolproof?
Thanks a lot for your kind guidance.
Alexandre

Richard, It worked. Just replaced routers and connected computers 1 by 1. Now, a little disappointed. Have 2 desktops with cables 1 XP + 1 Vista), 2 notebooks wireless N (these latter are new Sony Vaios - Vista). File transfers between the network is slower than before, when I had all 4 computers with cables on the old, simple DLink. Thanks.

At wits end trying to set up router with this laptop!

I am very frustrated trying to setup any router with this laptop.
I am also trying to run a wired G3 beige (OS 9.1) ethernet connection.
I have tried both a Airport Extreme and a Netgear WGR614. Both of these routers have worked in the past, but not now!
Once in a while I can achieve connectivity through the router, but nothing consistent.
The internet connection works just fine when the router is removed from the network.
I am well aware that the problem maybe some very simple setting or sequence of operations in configuring the network - but I am very much out of ideas, inspiration, and patience.
1.Does anybody have any ideas?
2.Does anybody know of a complete idiots' guide to setting up these routers? (Netgear is NO help)
3.Is there anything inherently wrong about trying to run a wired G3 with OS 9 and a wireless G4 with OS 10.4 from the same router?

I would take a close look at possible radio interference, from nearby routers, cordless telephones, microwave ovens, and so on. If 2 routers worked before and now do not, this says something. Have a friend with a wireless laptop try your signal.
Generally, routers can be default configured and work, although they'll be totally unsecure, which is dangerous. There should be no issues with having an OS9 and OSX computers using the router. Sorry, router settings take a while to learn and are a little different for each brand. Intermittent operation isn't typical of any setting that I know of, WITH THE EXCEPTION that selecting other radio channels sometimes helps.
As the Rabbit mentions, your computer could have a flaw, so you have to test this by having another wireless user try your signal.
BTW, I have encountered a consistent problem through the last few OSs of my Airport reception working fine mostly, then suddenly dying with no indication (other than the net stops working). I have to turn Airport off, then on again to get it working again. This is so annoying, I generally use ethernet now.

Trying to set up a linksys router but the cd says it works with OSX 10.6 and later. I am currently running the newest version of mountain lion.... what is the matter with this OSX update needed?

trying to set up a linksys router but the cd says it works with OSX 10.6 and later. I am currently running the newest version of mountain lion.... what is the matter with this OSX update needed?

Your install disk must look like this
and not like this.
Those gray disks are machine specific and will only work with model of Mac that they shipped with.

Dlink 655 and westell 6100

I bought a dlink n router 655 yesterday to replace my old belkin router. When i connect the modem to the n router and try to setup with the cd, it wont detect the internet. The modem i'm using is westell 6100. I had to bridge the modem to connect to the old router in order for it to work on that one. The new router i cant get it to work no matter what i do. I tried resetting the modem back to its default, and it didn't work. So i bridged it again. I even followed the router setup instructions that i found on the verizon forums and did the clone mac off the modem. i really need help with this.

ok, i already did that. thats how that internet is working with old belkin router. i also have that printed out so i dont miss anything. Ill try to re-explain
I recently upgraded my old belkin router to a new dlink 655 n router. On my old router, the modem is bridged to it and works just fine. I turn everything off to set up my new router. It wants me to connect the modem directly to my computer during the install, so I have to reset the modem back to its default to take it out of bridge mode. After I do that, I don't get internet connection on the modem. The light just sits red. I let it sit for awhile and still nothing. I checked the settings and everything is back to default. I get tired and put it back in bridge mode and hook it back up to my old router and it works. I tried to install the new router plugged in with the modem in bridge but it wont detect the internet connection. For some reason the modem only wants to work with my old router and nothing else.

Wireless connection to D-Link DIR-655 router

I just got a MBP and I can't connect wirelessly to my D-link router (WPA password protected; wired connection works great). Aiport sees the router, asks for the password which I enter, and then I get the message "the selected network uses and Access Control List.. and this computer is not on the list." I've tried to add the MBP to my network using the Network Magic process for adding new devices (which worked just fine to wirelessly connect my PC laptop from work), but it can't seem to find the MBP. I tried the steps suggested by iVmichael to someone having a similar problem April 5-6, and also tried disabling my network lock, but so far haven't found the magic combination. Suggestions?
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8) D-Link DIR-655 router
MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

I had a similar problem and I needed a second computer (B) using a wired connection to the router to allow the other one (A) in. This is what I did:
1. Using the wired computer (B) I opened up the network so any computer could join the network wirelessly.
2. I joined the network with (A) wirelessly.
3. Once I had successfully joined the network with (A) I used the wired computer (B) to do a search for new computers so (A) could be registered in the Access Control List.
4. Using (B) I closed the network again.
5. Now I could join the network with (A) wirelessly without any trouble.

Webvpn GW's on one router with domain names

Hi,
I'm trying to configure multiple WebVPN gateways on one router using one front door VRF and multiple back door VRF's. Think of this like a cloud service provider with several customers using different VRFs and one Internet VRF used for the incoming connections for the remote users.
Doing so, several scenarios arise:
Using one gateway and several context with a seperate VRF for each.
Please let me know if I am wrong here:
I can only assign one trustpoint because I only have one gateway. This means that all users connecting can only use one domain name like "*.isp.com". This also implies the use of a wildcard certificate.
Using several gateways and several context with a seperate VRF for each.
I can only assign multiple trustpoints because I only have one gateway. This means that users connecting can use multiple domains name like "webvpn.clientA.com" and "webvpn.clientB.com".
I would prefer the first situation but then I run into a second problem:
There are several commands related to hostname and up till now I have not figured out which one does exactly what:
ROUTER(config)#webvpn gateway WEB_GW
ROUTER(config-webvpn-gateway)#hostname
ROUTER(config)#webvpn context CUST1_CT
ROUTER(config-webvpn-context)#gateway WEB_GW domain
ROUTER(config-webvpn-context)#gateway WEB_GW virtual-host
Is there anyone who can explain to me what exactly does what?
My personal guest is that I only need to configure the virtual-host like this" CUST1_CT -> virtual-host cust1.isp.com and CUST2_CT -> virtual-host cust2.isp.com". But I'm not sure about this and up till now I have not found any documentation that describes this very clearly.

I think for this to work correctly and be able to split traffic between the 2 ISPs, you would need to use BGP, because default is going to use one ISP or the other.
If you can use BGP, this link will help you in load shearing between multiple ISPs when you have one router.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#conf4
HTH

How to do destination NAT in a 2600 router with IOS 12.3?

Hi All
I have a 2600 router with two LAN interfaces which I am using for a PoC and has the following settings:
FE 0/0 - 10.0.0.1/24 - client LAN - inside
FE 0/1 - 10.1.1.1/24 - server LAN - outside
The direction of the flows are from the clients to the servers. What I would like to achieve is when clients accessing the web server 10.1.1.10, this to be replaced by 10.1.1.100.
I have tried the above a few times but doesn't work. Is the above possible? And If so please provide me with a sample config.
Many Thanks
[email protected]

Yes, you can do this. You don't need destination NAT. Source NAT translations work both ways. This should work:
ip nat inside source static tcp 10.1.1.100 80 10.1.1.10 80
int fa 0/0
ip nat inside
int fa 0/1
ip nat outside
The bigger question is why you'd want to. Just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you SHOULD. Unless you have the 10.1.1.0 network subnetted or some sort of firewall/blocking in place, both IPs should be reachable by the hosts. Why not just have them go directly to 10.1.1.100 instead of going to 10.1.1.10? If there's a firewall or similar blocking 10.1.1.100, why not adjust your firewall settings instead? You could have a valid reason for doing this but I can't think of very many scenarios off the top of my head where this would make sense. If you can post more details on what you're trying to accomplish, you might get better advice on a better way to solve the problem.

MacBook Pro, wireless dlink 655 problem

I have a MacBook Pro, 10.5.4, and a dlink n wireless DIR-655 router. My wireless connection used to work great, but now it doesn't. The pages will load normally for a few minutes, then stop, and eventually my connection will be dropped.
Everyone else on the network has a PC, and they are not experiencing any problems. We've downloaded the latest dlink firmware.
Does anyone have any solutions?

I too have a DIR-655 and running 10.5.4 on my MacBook Pro and having similar issues. The DIR-655 has the latest firmware. It sometimes hangs loading pages or they will finally load after a 30-40 seconds, even when in the same room with the router. The MacBook Pro works fine on other networks not running N. I changed the router settings to just allow G and all works fine. I'm searching for another router.

Low cost router with DHCP option 66

I am trying to find the lowest cost Cisco router with option 66. I use the router in conjunction with spa50x phones and need to be able to have them config at boot up.
I was using the srp521. It was suggested to use the isa550, but that just got an EOL. Do any of the RV routers support it, I did not find it on a rv110 and I know its not on the rv042. It seems to me that this is a functionality that should be on a router aimed at a small business.
Sage

Dear Sage,
Thank you for reaching the Small Business Support Community.
Unfortunately none of the Small Business routers were intended to provide DHCP option 66 for IP Phones configuration via TFTF server. I suggest you to look for a enterprise device for that matter, like an ASA for example, and you can also inquire about a low cost option from their community support forum.
My job role in Cisco, among several, is to identify business opportunities and product enhancements for the Small Business products so I am definitely going to suggest this option 66 feature for future firmware releases.
Please do not hesitate to reach me back if there is anything I may assist you with in the meantime.
Kind regards,
Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
Cisco Customer Support Engineer
*Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Trying to config a Dlink 655 router with a ActionTec

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for