Trying to decide which Mac Pro is best for me

Hi-
It's high time I upgrade to a Mac Pro and I need to do so in a month or two. I can't wait around for whatever new version of Mac Pro may come out in the Fall.
I am very confused as to whether an August 2010 Quad core 2.8 ghz or 3.2 ghz versus an August 2010 2.4 ghz 8 core is better for my needs.
I use my Mac for FCS and DVD compression. I usually use iDVD. My work is editing primarily for legal purposes- Mediation presentations, Day in the Life Documentaries and depositions. There is not much use for things like Motion or other effects. Right now I use Livetype for some animated titles.
I am sure, compared to what I have now, a Quad core's speed will make me pee my pants and would be perfect for my purposes. My concern is what will continue to be supported over the next 3-4 years if I don't run out and buy a new computer until then. Will newer software updates continue to work fine on a quad core or willa n 8 core be a requirement as Intel processors are de rigeur for software updates.
I'd appreciate your thoughts, Apple community. Thanks!

Go back to page one of that MacRumors thread.
Very complete with photos etc
It takes me a long time and work to wrap my head around details.
You asked about 8-core performance.
I recommended the $2100 special and $600 cpu, you can then sell the original cpu for $300 and come out with $2495 for 6-core system that is 50% faster than what it was.
Allocate for RAM (4 x 4GB or 3 x 8GB), extra hard drives, eventually an SSD boot drive ($200) also.
RAM, drives, SSDs, they even do (very expensive$$$) processor "Turnkey" upgrades.
Intel® Xeon® Processor W3670 (12M Cache, 3.20 GHz, 4.80 GT s Intel® QPI)with SPEC Code(s)SLBVE
W3670 Upgrade photos
Intel Xeon W3670 3.20GHz Hexacore Buy

Similar Messages

I need help to decide which macbook pro is best for photo editing, editing movies and doing all the rest too like excel, word etc. 13"

I need help to decide which macbook pro is best for photo editing, editing movies and doing all the rest too like microsoft office products ...excel, word etc. I am new to the apple world and have liked the idea of the MAC Book Pro 13" but really dont know if this is good enough or if the computer will soon crash?
13-inch: 2.6GHz
with Retina display
Specifications
2.6GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
Turbo Boost up to 3.1GHz
8GB 1600MHz memory
512GB PCIe-based flash storage1
Intel Iris Graphics
Built-in battery (9 hours)2

That's a fine machine and, with 8GB of RAM and 512GB flash storage should serve you well for light video/photo editing as well as for 'normal' usage. And it should last you for years to come.
Good luck in making your decision!!
Clinton

Can i use Avid mbox pro with logic pro x? And also which mac would be best for using avid pro tools 11 ;)

Can i use Avid mbox pro with logic pro x? And also which mac would be best for using avid pro tools 11

If your info is correct you need to first buy Snow Leopard from the Apple on-line store ($20) install and update to 10.6.8 and then buy Lion from the App Store for $20.

Which Mac Pro to buy for Studio 3

Guys, I'm in the process of upgrading my trusted Power Mac G5 Quad to a Mac Pro.
I will also upgrade to FCS 3.
My question is, which Mac Pro to buy? Quad 2.93 OR Octo 2.26?
Will FCS 3 along with Snow Leopard utilise ALL the Octo's processors? Or am I better off saving the money and sticking with a Quad?

If your income depends on this work, then buy the biggest, baddest, most RAM-filled Mac Pro you can.
At least get the octo 2.66. Put 12GB RAM in it, if you can, but put a minimum of 6GB in there. The concept is that as a professional editor, editing for clients, you must be as time efficient as you can afford to be.
Compressor will use that RAM to compress your stuff a lot faster. Also, Motion can make use of as much RAM as you throw in there. Final Cut Pro itself, not yet.

Which mac pro to get for music production?

which is the best macbook to get for music production? I want it mainly to be able to handle a lot of vsts being used simultaneously. I see upgrade options such as from an ata drive to a solid state, and am wondering on which would be the best for my cause! any help would be much appreciated!

Avi Selva wrote:
well im looking at the 15 inch non retina and the retina doesnt come with a superdrive, as ill be needing that to burn material straight from my laptop to cds. So that more or less rules out any of the retina display models. Its just the customizing i needed help unless you could suggest another model entirely!
You can add an Optical drive to the Retina models connected by USB. And it does not have to be the Apple branded (Not So) Superdrive. It can be any portable CD/DVD burner that connects by USB.
But in all honesty you can get a faster Windows PC notebook then any of the Mac notebooks for around 1/2 - 2/3 the cost for what you want to do with it.

Which Mac Mini is best for Editing in Final Cut Pro X i5 or i7 ?

Hey guys plz suggest me a good mac mini machine for editing in Final Cut Pro X. Is there any difference in i5 mac mini or i7 in terms of rendering or editing, and what is the use of an SSD drive in terms of editing in mac mini either than its 5400rpm HD, or should i buy imac i5 with ssd ?
Lets see if i buy mac mini i5 with 16gb ram and a ssd drive, Will it work better than mac mini i7 with 16gb ram but without ssd drive ?
So guys plzz suggest me the best mac specs for video editing
Thanks in advance

Your budget?
Take a look at this: http://www.barefeats.com/minivmp.html
The 2012 Quad-Core i7 Mac mini is a real contender when it comes to CPU power compared to our examples of a Quad-Core Mac Pro and Quad-Core iMac. We plan to add some other examples of Quad-Core desktop Macs (including a faster Mac mini) to these graphs in the days ahead but the point is made.
However, the GPU in the 2012 Quad-Core i7 Mac mini is weak in comparison to the Mac Pro (and iMac) as you can see from the "Heaven" graph.
That's going to affect its ability to handle advanced Pro Apps that make use of the GPU for certain types of effect rendering.
These apps include Apple's Final Cut Pro and Motion as well as Adobe's Photoshop, Premiere Pro, and After Effects.
The Mac mini's Intel HD 4000 GPU will also hamstring hard-core gamers.
The Mac mini is also weak in support of OpenCL as you can see from the "LuxMark" graph.
It is forced to render the model using only CPU while the iMac and Mac Pro GPUs are able to render the model.
Why does this matter? Because apps like Final Cut Pro, Motion, and Photoshop use OpenCL acceleration for rendering certain effects.
http://www.barefeats.com/imac12p1.html
Even a Mac Pro (refurbished special 4-core 2.8 is $1819 and can be upgraded to more RAM, 4x4TB w/o going into Thunderbolt storage) and have multiple SSDs as the choice or need arises.)
Fusion drive + Thunderbolt but I think you are asking too much out of the mini. It is fine for a lot of uses.

Which Mac Pro to buy for Logic?

Hi, I am a Logic Pro user, I use lots of tracks with automation, lots of virtual instruments and other plugins.
I've finally settled on getting a Mac Pro, since I want to use a UAD card, as well as for expandability. So now... Which one? For a given budget, do I want to:
1) max RAM
vs
2) max clock speed
vs
3) max number of cores/procs
Eventually I'll get lots of RAM, so #2 and #3 are my main questions, which will get me the the biggest bang for my buck specifically for use with Logic Pro?
Thanks!
Message was edited by: smeet

Things to consider:
At the moment, the single processor Mac Pros arent that great in terms of value. 4 memory slots is just kind of crappy for a machine that costs so much.
That being said, logic wont support more than 8 cores, meaning nothing above the quad core is going to be worth your money for strict use with logic. We have no idea when logic will support more cores.
Now is not the greatest time to be buying a Mac Pro for various reasons. What kind of budget are you on? Your best bet might be a refurbished 2009 quad core or a 2008 octocore.

Which Mac Pro to buy for Music Production

Hi All
Hope you can help.
Currently I have a macbook pro ( 2.66Ghz + 4GB ).
Im planning to buy a mac pro for music production, which is better
4 Core 2.66Ghz Nehalem CPU + 3x2GB or
8 Core 2.26 Ghz Nehalem CPU + 6x2GB
Im heavy on VST/AU's, use a fair bit of audio samples and also will be using a load of ROMpler style sampler instruments.
Im also looking to future proof the system but if the 8 core system is unnecssary for using logic studio id rather get the 4 core option as its easier on my budget.
Im also planning to run 3 x 1tb HDD's ( 1 x OS / 1 x Samples / 1 x Music )
Hope you can advise as itching to buy one with my commission money
Cheers
Andrew

JG99 wrote:
I've heard from a few Logic users and read on other forums that there is currently little difference in performance between the 8-core and 4-core Mac Pro's when running Logic 8. This may change in the future...?
Really? The benchmarks seem to indicate that the 8 x 2.26 is 30-40 % more powerful than the 4 x 2.66, a significant difference...
Personally, I'd get a quad core and spend the difference on ram (from crucial.com) as this will make more of a difference when running power hungry plug-ins.
JG
But the 4 core has a max RAM of 8 GB where the 8 core maxes to 32 GB. Might be worth considering.

Which Mac Pro Graphics Card For A Multimedia Installation with 4 Projectors?

Hi All,
I'm looking for advice on a multimedia installation I'm working on as part of my thesis. Essentially I need to use my Mac Pro to run a multimedia installation that will use four projectors (Full HD) all displaying as one logical display. I then need to have two separate monitors to control back ground functions of the installation. My Mac Pro is an early 2008 model and intend to use the current graphics card to run the control monitors. So my questions are...
One of the main things I'm unsure about is if it's possible to output on more than one graphics output and have the computer see it as one display. Any one have experience with this?
Is there a graphics card compatible with OSX that will output to four displays simultaneously? Keeping in mind that it would have to have an option to see all the displays as one one single desktop so when I go full screen that the application I'm using will fill all four projector screens (I'm not concerned with edge detection or blending as it's not an issue). This display would be running at a resolution of 7680x1080 (4 x 1) or 3840×2160 (2 x 2).
If there isn't a four port graphics card, is there a similar type of card with just two outputs? Each display would would need to be capable of outputting half the combined necessary resolution each. I have looked at the option of using Matrox TripleHead2Go multiple display adaptors which would work provided I can find a card that will output to two displays while seeing the output as one singular desktop. That would essentially be two ports outputting the resolution above which can then be split among the Matrox TripleHead2Gos.
Finally, there is the small issue of what ports to use - DP or DVI? My understanding is that Dp can carry DVI so I'm covered in that case as well as DP cables being able to go slightly further in length than DVI? Any advice on this too?
Thanks,
Derek

The Mac already has the feature you need for seamless tiling of multi-display output. It has been built-in to Mac OS since System 4.2 was issued for the original Mac-II. It is called "Extended Desktop". Every well-behaved Mac Application can use it without modification, unless the author chooses to defeat the feature, as was done in some versions of iMovie.
Based on this feature, you are massively over-thinking the display and interface process. "It's in there."
When you set up multiple displays, whether on one card or multiple cards, the Mac can create an Extended Desktop. Each display provides a portion of this larger extended Desktop, and the displays are "joined" along the edges you specify. Windows split across displays continue to be updated and scroll as one window, regardless of the parameters of each display. The Arrange pane in System Preferences > Displays is used to re-arrange the Icons of each display to correspond with their arrangement in (real) space.
When the Mac Pro 2009 came out, its display card, the NVIDIA GeForce GT120, could be installed in multiples in every slot to get up to eight displays. It does not require Aux power connection. I believe it will also work in the 2008 model. It is still available in the Apple store:
NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Graphics Upgrade Kit for Mac Pro (early 2009)

Which mac notebook is best for me?

Hello forum it's almost black friday and I'm a college student and what I'll be doing with the computer is your music, research papers, web browsing, netflix very little travel. I would like the computer to run fast and last me a while about 5 years. I'm debating the regular 13' inch pro with upgraded i7 and 8gb OR second tier 13 inch pro retina with i5 and last 13 inch air with upgraded i7 and 8gb ram. They are all about the same most and I know the differences between them. Its hard deciding which to buy?

If "high-end" games are your main interest, you don't
want the entry level Mini or the Mini Server because
the use the Intel HD3000 integrated graphics.
The only one with discrete graphics is the 2.5 GHz i5 or
the 2.7 GHz i7 option. This may be able to handle what
you want but will defer to gamers comments on that.
Personally, I would go with the i7 as CPU performance is
always a good thing to have around and will also handle
video crunching better.
As far as RAM just go right to 8 gig, but buy it
from OWC or Newegg as Apple's is way over priced.

Which model should I use for Multimedia purposes? (Multimedia major in need of help deciding which model is the best for me.)

Multimedia major looking for a model in Apple that is best for me. Any advice is welcome.

Hi
1)you need to check the requiered characteristics are available or not from these data sources which supply data to the above said cubes,,2
2)0CCA_C11
3)0IC_C03
You cann't get the inventory report from the purchasing data(purchasing data always talks about the vendor supplying inventory,it never talks about the production inventory)
Hope it helps
Thanks
Teja

Which Mac Pro to buy for Logic Pro and Final Cut Pro X?

Hi, I'm considering to buy a Mac Pro for my personal studio. I have 2 choices in my mind: 1st one is the "Quad-core (one 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon) with 6GB RAM", and the 2nd one is "12-core (Two 2.4GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon) with 12GB RAM". I'll be mainly using Logic Pro 9 and hardcore video editing in Final Cut Pro X. I know the fact that having higher GHz than more cores may benefit you at some point, and only those software applications that are well-written for using multiple cores will be able to utilize the power of 12-core. So, I need to know that are Logic and FCPX are such apps? Are they able to utilize the power of 12-cores or a Quad-core with more GHz will be better? I'm looking for fast operation and smoother workflow, and I'll also be using this computer for a very long time (so, its a major investment!).
So, the ultimate verdict is to whether to go for more clockspeed or more cores? Money is not the problem here, and I will add more RAMs, SSD according to the need later after couple of months, but considering nothing else I need you to compare between these two machines! If the 12-core machine is even 1% faster I'll go for it, but I don't want to end up spending more money on the machine with will have less power and utility.
Regards.

6 core 3.33 1st choice
8 core 2.93 or higher

Which MacBook Pro is best for an online MBA program and face to face classes?

I'm going back to school for an MBA and going to pick up some certifications first. I'll be attending online classes and some face to face classes. How much MacBook Pro do I need? I'm in the HR community, and my MBA is in Global Managment if that helps any.

Move to MacBook forums

Time for a new Mac - Whats the BEST for Aperture?

Its time for me to upgrade my box and while I have money to spend I don't want to break the bank. This computer is just for Aperture!!! Which is the best graphic card(s), do I need 16 gigs of memory, is two quads worth the money? If I put RAID in can I get by with just 2 hard drives or do I need 4 for speed? If I buy the best and most of everything the box and displays comes to $14,000. Do I have to spend that much? $8000 is more realistic. What do you suggest?
TIA
Chris

Best is to wait until after Mac Expo SF in 2 weeks, then decide which Mac Pro is best. Aperture demands heavy hardware so the highest end MP will be "best" but some middle range model or even an older model may be most cost effective while still very good. Wait.
Today 2 drives in a RAID 0 array probably saturates a MP as far as throughput is concerned, but we need to wait and see what new MPs, cards, etc. are before configuring an optimum Aperture box. Doing exactly that homework is much of what I will be doing at Mac Expo.
-Allen Wicks

Which mac pc is good for iPad development in between mac mini or mac book pro

which mac pc is good for iPad development in between mac mini or mac book pro so give me details which is much more better for ios development

The best thing for iOS development is your imagination. Coming up with unique creative apps is what’s most important. I've had a mini since they first came out, and I think it's the best desktop around. However you may not want a desktop because you're more mobile when you work on apps. With the mini you can use a much bigger screen (I use a 80 inch) but the laptop has a slightly better processor (if you decide to pay extra for it). I'm learning app development also and a laptop would drive me crazy, but it's a personal choice, so you first need to decide where you are going to be while you're developing. If it’s at home or a office then the mini might be better. The mini and the macbook pro are both two incredible products. I don’t think you can make a wrong decision as far as which one handles app design better. They’re both great in that department.

Trying to decide which Mac Pro is best for me

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for