TS130-11051CU Raid Storage Console

Anyone have any idea what Windows RAID Storage Console I can use to monitor within Windows 2008R2 Foundation? I have it all configured during bootup just fine, but would like to be able to monitor from with Windows. Especially helpful for Remote Administration...
Thanx in advance!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanx for getting back to me.
Sorry, it is for the onboard Intel. I tried various versions of the RST (Rapid Storage Technology) and finally found this one here worked.
http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/downloads/detail.page?DocID=DS013896
However it didn't add in the "Service" & consequently I would get an error that the console couldn't connect to the service which wasn't even listed in the installed services. So I had to manually add the service by typing in the following at an elevated command window;
sc create "Intel RST DM Service" binpath= "c:\program files (x86)\intel\intel(r) rapid storage technology\iastordatamgrsvc.exe"
Then I had to insure that the “Intel RST DM Service” was set to Startup Type “Automated (Delayed Start)”
All is good now! I wanted to test it out on another system & I tried the same thing on my own server that I had been procrastinating on doing for quite some time now (Intel M/board with same Xeon processor & Intel C200 chipset) but didn’t have to manually add the service, it did it itself.

Similar Messages

TS130 1105-19U RAID controller driver issues

I am trying to load WIndows 2008 Server Foundation on some ThinkServers. In a nutshell, after the Windows 2008 Foundation installer reboots, the server cannot find any bootable devices. I did this with the TS130 startup DVD, I did this manually loading the newest Intel driver and I tried this manually loading an older Intel driver. I even took the same driver that is used on another TS130 and that didn't work either.
I checked the RAID configuration and the logical drive exists.
Can someone recommend the exact driver I should be using for the Intel Rapid Storage Technology Controller or offer a suggestion on how to get Windows to recognize the controller?
thank you

Most recent BIOS must be installed and BIOS must be set to UEFI, not Auto or Legacy. It took me days to get mine to boot using dual 1.5TB drives. See this post --> http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkServer-Towers/TS130-RAID-Problems-with-Windows-Server-2008-R2-but-N...

Intel RAID error in Device Manager after updating Intel Matrix Storage Console

The latest in my catalogue of problems arose after updating Intel Matrix Storage Console (IMSC) ...
Lost my RAID volume, but both drives were OK. However, IMSC seemed to be freezing, so I thought I'd install the latest version from Intel. Once installed, it gave me errors saying a plug in was not found, followed by messages saying that the SATA and RAID drivers were not installed. Device Manager thinks the drivers are OK, but the yellow triangle with the ! is shown against the Intel RAID driver. Tried un-installing and re-installing the controller, updating the drivers, different versions of IMSC and still get the yellow triangle with the !
I have been having trouble with the RAID0 set up for weeks so wonder if it has finally died? I'm out of ideas. Can anyone help?
This post gives more details of the history and PC configuration: https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=121960.0

Quote from: NovJoe on 23-March-09, 14:53:31
Why don't you want to follow up with your previous thread?
It'll be confusing when you started multiple threads linking to the issue.
Sorry, I haven't posted here much so I'm not familiar with the protocols. I just thought it would be less confusing to make this a separate issue. I linked them to avoid duplicating info on my config & h/w

Extra monitors and raid storage on a 17" Macbook Pro

I have a 17" Macbook Pro, and I want 2 things:
An externnal monitor, as well as thunderbolt raid storage.
Is there any way to connect an extra monitor while using the Thunderbolt for raid storage?
Or do I have to use the eSata card for raid storage?
I need the real estate on the big screen to get things done, but I also would like to have the Thunderbolt raid storage.
What are my options? Any help appreciated.
Thanks.

So yours is an Early 2011 MBP then http://support.apple.com/kb/SP621
May I suggest the 27" Apple ThunderBolt Display http://www.apple.com/displays/specs.html plus a ThunderBolt Storage from these http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_mac/mac_accessories/storage?n=thunder bolt&s=topSellers
Stefan

Pegasus RAID Storage with Thunderbolt opinions / backup solutions?

I'm trying to get some opinions about the Pegasus RAID Storage with Thunderbolt
http://www.promise.com/storage/raid_series.aspx?m=192&region=en-global&rsn1=40&r sn3=47
since I've been researching some info for a friend who is looking for extremely reilable local storage solution for his record label.
Does anyone here use this? If so, do you use it with Time Machine? And also what type of RAID setup did you use?
I was thinking of a RAID 5 setup, since I feel that would be best in the long run should any drives fail, the backed up data would still be available on the other drives even if the performane is a bit slower until the failed drive is replaced. I would like to hear about people's experience with these drives and RAID setups. Also if anyone might want to suggest other disk options, please feel free to mention them here.
This would mostly be for "Setup 1" which is mostly audio production dedicated.
There is also a need for a "Setup 2" which would be mostly business/document dedicated.
Would it be better to get another smaller local back up solution for Setup 2?
We're not too keen on using Time Capsule for Setup 2 as their long term performance does have a great track record.
We're also going to be using Carbonite to have an offsite/remote backup of everything we have locally, but I'm not too familar with their services as well and if anyone here can comment on that I would apprecaite it. I've read up a bit on them and I would think to probably use their Business level service.
Any help, advice, opinions are welcome and appreacaited!
Thanks!

You can (re-)install to the Pegasus raid and boot from it.
However, you'll actually get a faster system if you use an SSD for the system drive and then just use the Pegasus for data files (and Time Machine backups of the SSD ...).
In any case:
Be sure to use the Promise Utility (download it from their site) to configure the RAID level etc if you don't want the default RAID 5 configuration. (For me I prefer RAID 6 if there are more than 4 drives, RAID 1 for 2 drives and RAID 10 for 4 drives – RAID 5 is just too risky; even configured with a spare).
If you use the Pegasus as your system drive, consider using RAID 10 on it. You'll "only" get 6 TB storage; but it'll be fast and quite safe (much safer than RAID 5).

Two Xserve hosts connect to an Xserve RAID storage system

Hello everyone
We have 2 Xserver hosts and a RAID storage:
Host A has Dual-port Fibre Channel PCI card
Host B doesn´t have Dual-port Fibre Channel PCI card
Right now I am using

I tried to put the whole text. It did not work. What is wrong?
I put it here:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=835809&tstart=0

RAID Storage Systems

Anyone care to recommend the best RAID storage systems for iMac, greater than 1TB? I read a review in MacWorld on the LaCie, but it is only RAID 0 and therefore not great for LT storage of prized and growing digital content libraries. I am thinking RAID 5 with data striping. I am new to the Mac world and would really welcome this forum input.
Thanks
Mark

I have three hard drives of equal size (300 GBs in my case.) Two drives are configured as a mirrored RAID (RAID 1) and acts as the permanent backup of the other. This setup provides redundant backup for safety. I use a backup utility to create and maintain a clone of the main drive to the backup RAID doing scheduled backups on a daily, weekly, and monthly schedule. Here are some recommendations for backup software:
1. Retrospect Desktop (Commercial - not yet universal binary)
2. Synchronize! Pro X (Commercial)
3. Synk (Backup, Standard, or Pro)
4. Deja Vu (Shareware)
5. PsynchX 2.1.1 and RsyncX 2.1 (Freeware)
The following utilities can also be used for backup, but cannot create bootable clones:
1. Backup (requires a .Mac account with Apple both to get the software and to use it.)
2. Toast
3. Impression
4. arRSync
Apple's Backup is a full backup tool capable of also backing up across multiple media such as CD/DVD. However, it cannot create bootable backups. It is primarily an "archiving" utility as are the other two.
Impression and Toast are disk image based backups, only. Particularly useful if you need to backup to CD/DVD across multiple media.
As far as creating a RAID is concerned a striped RAID (RAID 0) is similar to RAID 5 except it lacks the distributed parity. The OS X built-in RAID software can create RAID 0, 1, and 0+1 arrays.
Why reward points?(Quoted from Discussions Terms of Use.)
The reward system helps to increase community participation. When a community member gives you (or another member) a reward for providing helpful advice or a solution to their question, your accumulated points will increase your status level within the community.
Members may reward you with 5 points if they deem that your reply is helpful and 10 points if you post a solution to their issue. Likewise, when you mark a reply as Helpful or Solved in your own created topic, you will be awarding the respondent with the same point values.

Intel Matrix Storage Console - Satellite A300 1BZ

Hi
I have a A300 1BZ and I've noticed that the Intel Matrix Storage Console is informing me that I have 3 SATA ports (0,1 and 2).
It informs me that ports 0 & 1 are in use (I have 2 hard disks fitted) and port 2 is not being used.
What I want to know is it possible that this little A300 can accommodate a 3rd hard disk?
Feedback appreciated!

I've just looked at my friends P300 the Intel software lists 4 sata ports available, one is being used for a hard disk and the other is being used for his DVD/CD drive, 2 are unused.
Maybe my 3rd port is for the option of having SATA optical drive as my current CD/DVD drive is ATA!
Makes more sense!

Looking for some RAID storage ideas...can anyone help?

Hi, I'm looking for some recommendations out there. I'm going to be getting a new PowerMac tower with a cinema display and will also be looking to get some RAID-type storage for it so that I can do lots of video editing and photo storage.
Ideally, I'd like to get a rack-type storage with swappable drives much like the XServe RAID but I don't need it to have server capabilities like the XServe does, i.e. I'm not going online with anything. This is purely going to be working as an external storage tower that two adjeacent computers will be directly firewired to.
Obviously, the XServe would fit this, but like I said, I don't need the computer/server capability and also would not want to spend $6000 just for a single TB of storage that the XServe has. I'm thinking more along the lines of a swappable drive rack system like the old Avid systems used to have 10 years ago. Does anyone know if Apple makes such a thing? Or if any third party companies do?
Thanks.

If you are using typical DV cameras you don't need striped RAID to capture the video or edit it either. And striped means you lose one drive you lose two drives worth of data.
The LaCie Bigger and Biggest disks may be suitable solutions, they are hardware RAIDed internally and come in 1 and 1.5TB models, using FW 800 they are plenty fast for video.

What RAID storage system should I use?

To set the stage here. I'm somewhat of a newbie to the video industry. I've worked as a videographer for a non-profit for 5 years. At that job, we just skimped by on what we could afford, which wasn't much. I just started a new "professional level" job for a school district and have been given the keys to a fairly substantial budget to get whatever I need to do the job.
I want to do right by them and not waste money, so I want my purchase decisions to be educated. I'm an intermediate computer user, but have never used raid configurations before, so please be kind. Also, we can really only purchase through a few vendors. B&H is where I'm getting all my other video equipment, so I'm only looking at options available there for my storage needs as well.
Right now we record using Canon XA10 and XA20 model cameras. I'm hoping to upgrade to XF300's with this new budget, but still we're only talking MXF files, 1920x1080 at 50Mbps 4:2:2. So I'm not dealing with huge uncompressed footage.
Still I record a fair amount of footage. In the first 2 months on the job I've accumulated about 460GB of raw video, and I don't expect demand to go down in the future.
Right now, my idea is to purchase two Western Digital 12TB Raid Arrays in Raid 0.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1053138-REG/wd_wdblwe0120jch_nesn_12tb_my_book_duo.h tml
(I should note, I'm using a Windows 7 PC, so I only have access to USB 3.0, not Thunderbolt)
The first raid array would be my scratch disk, the second would be used for manual backup at the end of every day. (Using a utility like SyncBack)
Once my projects are complete, and I'm sure I won't need to access them, I'd like to move them off to a 3rd RAID array like this set up in Raid 5 for redundancy.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1018063-REG/owc_other_world_computing_mercury_qx2_4_ by_hw.html#specOWCM3QX2K0GB
This array would serve primarily as an archival unit, with only occasional transfers to it and use in only rare circumstances where I need access to several month old footage.
Do you have any suggestions of a better system or workflow?
Thanks so much!

Would be good to raise this over on the:
Hardware Forum ...
https://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/hardware_forum
Neil

RAID / Storage Rebuild... requesting clarifications for all ;)

Hello All,
I'm replacing the 2 Seagate HDDs out of my home video editing system (CS5) that was previously configured as below, and think its a good time to get clarification on some items I never really resolved after many hours of research, to include where the different items should be installed/stored on a six-HDD system, and/or whether someone in my situation should completely re-think the system setup.
It was in the following configuration not out of original intention, but due to adding HDDs over time...
Intel RST/Matrix RAID via ASUS P6T Deluxe V2....
2 x 1TB Seagate HDDs w/ 3 Partitions
C: OS & Critical Programs in 100GB Matrix Raid1 Partition,
D: Saved Adobe Project Files, etc. in 250GB RAID0 Parition
E: Rendered Outputs, etc. in remaining GBs RAID0 Partition
2 x 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
F: Scratch files on 2GB RAID0
2 x 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
G: Original Video / Media Storage on 2GB RAID0
System Hardware:
Asus P6T Deluxe V2
i7 980
2 x 1TB Seagate 7200 HDDs (changing to something else)
4 x 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3 7200 HDDs
1 x Asus GTX570 Direct CU II (exchanging for a 2-slot card, as this 3-slot won't snap secure due to sata port locations, etc)
1 x GTX275 for additional video out (haven't actually tried 3 monitors yet)
24GB Corsair Vengeance RAM
900w power supply
Cooler Master HAF Case
Various external HDDs for periodic backup via eSATA
Was Vista, ordering Windows 7 Pro
1) Assuming the hardware remains 6 x 7200RPM HDDs on a P6T Deluxe V2 (sort of want to stay on it, since just got an expensive lga1366 cpu), which only has 6 SATA ports available...
a) Am I even correct that the best editing configuration for six HDDs is 3 x RAID0 arrays?
b) If so, how should I distribute the following items across the 3 arrays - OS, Programs, Adobe Projects, Scratch, Outputs, Original Media? I could never figure out from forums which items are the most important to separate from each other on different discs.
2) Or should I really be modifying the system to allow more than the 6 HDDs at this point?
a) Now for the really nebulous question... if I need to change, should this be an internal RAID controller card with more ports, or does it need to be an external setup?
If I really need expanded equipment, I'm ok with things like buying "faster" HDDs (10k or whatever) to replace the 2 Seagates if that's a strong recommendation, spending a bit on better RAID equipment if it is actually worthwhile, but...
1. Can't spend a thousand to only slightly improve it
2. Need a setup that someone of moderate computer skill and experience can setup and maintain.
In particular, the question of how to distribute the various items/ tasks across existing discs is likely of interest to many readers. This is talked about a lot, but I'm really unclear on how best to distribute them and in what priority if you don't have separate arrays for every item/task.
Thanks to anyone interested!
P.S. NOTE to other amateurs w/ my RAID setup... trying to install a large graphics card and somehow resetting the BIOS in the process is what spurred my current possible re-build. Didn't realize it had reset, continued startup to find Intel RST not functioning, drives renamed and of course RAID0s inaccessible. Then changing back to RAID setup in BIOS not effective at that point. Since I have important stuff backed up and wanted to change out some drives anyway, not worth trying to restore the RAID and recover, but you might end up in worse shape. SUPPOSEDLY if you change the setting back to RAID before OS startup, your arrays and Intel RST will function normally even after the bios reset.

I swear you are a benevolent jaguar, always lurking and ready to pounce at a moment's notice!
Information received and agreed. That's exactly the simple breakdown I've needed to know for years. I assume the 1TB on C: & F: is not a mandate, but based on already having 1TB HDDs on-hand (and also assuming it should be large enough to keep the disc usage % low)?
Unless I'm advised otherwise, I suppose I'll just get the "fastest" large capacity non-ssd HDD's I can (maybe velociraptor 600gb?) for the non-RAID single discs then (C: & F: drives), since I want to replace the two seagate HDDs anyway. I guess both seek/read time and not just throughput/write stats are relevant for the C: OS drive, if not so much for the export F: drive. For that matter, guess I could just SSD the C: drive, and Velociraptor (or something with more capacity) the F: drive.
Many Thanks!
P.S.: Assumed the matrix partition wasn't a good idea... a hold-over from when I only had 2HDDs and was guessing my way along.

Local raid storage: G-Speed, CalDigit, etc?

Hello, looking for some storage recommendations. I'm going to be cutting a low-budget feature in the next couple of months. The footage will be coming off a 7D so I'll be looking for a raid solution, Raid 5 perhaps? I'll be cutting on an Imac and Macbook Pro (I know, I know...), so currently the best connection will be Firewire800. Although, I'd like to keep an eSATA port on board for future uses. I was thinking of the G-Speed Q, 4TB as it can do Raid 5, with the internal controller. Any other companies I should be looking at, specific drives?
Thanks!

Hi -
Within your budget, you could buy two of these, run them in raid 0 and keep one as cloned backup of your source material in case of drive corruption or failure.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/659809-REG/CalDigit720504_4TB_VR_ExternalHard.html
MtD

RAID storage solution for photographer

Hi all
I hope this question is not out of topic here.
I am looking for a RAID solution for storing my photographs, but I have little knowledge about RAID.
So far I have been using dvds but realised that after a couple of years some are not readable any more, so this isn't the right solution. So far no disaster as I have duplicates too but I need to do this quite soon before I loose important files.
Before I go further, I only have a PB and an old and slow intel3 PC recovered from a friend throwing it out.
I did read quite a few reviews about products, but there isn't too many around.
I believe that I need a Raid1 for data safety.
One merchant told me he had this solution for me, but can't find any review about it.
It does look very similar to another brand, which had bad reviews with failure after a few weeks.
I also cannot find the max capacity details.
Is there any photographer around who have found a good solution for storage and/or backing up?
Do you work on files directly from the unit, or transfer files on the PB when needed?
My PB has a firewire 400 that I use very often and a firewire 800 which I have never used so far.
But, are these little unit a good solution, or would a server be a better solution?
Not sure the advantage of servers.
I believe these little units exist also with network connectivity, but I am not sure if there is any advantage for me. I understand it is a bit slower. Can they be accessed online or do I need a server for that?
Can I convert my old PC as a server?
Sorry for the many questions, but I don't want to start spending money on something that does serves me well in the long run.
I am looking for effectiveness, longevity, price and simplicity in that order, but I don't have too much spare cash to splash.
I am mainly concerned about Apple dropping the firewire.
Many thanks in advance.
If you have a good solution that you are happy about, please let me know.
Cheers
Laurent

Thank you both.
I am a bit unfamiliar with the term redundancy. Do you mean that I need to back-up the RAID stuff?
I though that it was already a back-up? or is is just in case the raid enclosure fails?
Smokerz, do you mean that you just duplicate your data across few drives manually?
I like the drobo concept, but my main concern is if the drobo box fails, one needs to purchase the exact same product (same firmware) to be able to recover the data, or do you have a back-up off the drobo box on a single drive? Although I like the concept of having the facility to use any hard drive lying around, and not having to purchase identical drives. Are these special drives for RAID and server or just consumer drives.
Sorry if my questions might sound a bit stupid, but all the RAID stuff is a bit abstract for me so far.
I like the idea of being able to through the drive in any type of enclosure. My experience with electronic product, is that they are great until something goes wrong and that is when one discovers the limitation. The facility to access data with maximum compatibility with any other product is a must. I never purchase an enclosure of any sort without multiple connectivity, and it has served me well so far. But I have mainly backed-up system in that way.
So, while using a RAID1 (as I understand other raid just spread the data across few drives), and in case of a enclosure failure, would one be able to put the drives in an single drive enclosure just until a new enclosure is purchased? Or are the drives formated only to work in an array? Is there a solution against all troubles or am I just dreaming?
I have noticed that DU provides RAID facilities. Is this just for internal drives?
Many thanks

Familar with Dulce Systems Pro FC fibre channel raid storage?

I am looking for a good big storage that can use with 3 computers same time similar to Dulce Systems Pro FC. Have you use it or other product similar to this? I have so many external hard drives. I have to move those to other computer many times. I want to avoid those and saw Dulce systems. I think that it is cool system. Plese share your experience with it along with FCP and DVD SP. Before I make decision to buy one or not. Thanks.

You've a lot of assumptions there that aren't quite right. It doesn't matter if the source and transcoded material is on the same drive per se, but the transcode might go faster if they are not on the same drives. But there's no gotchas there in any event.
I'd format the array to be RAID 5. It's a ton safer and not much slower. That way if you lose a drive, the array can be rebuilt by just replacing the drive. Keep your scratch disk and all transcoded files on that array too. i.e, edit from that array, and render to it as well. Original R3D files can be stored internally no problem too, but if you're going to use them in Color, you might want them on that faster array too.
FCP doesn't use all those cores for sure, but Compressor can, and so do a lot of other apps appearing now, so I'd not think that the investment in an 8 core is lost for you in any event. Plus the next gen software may well take better advantage of the cores too. If you render in more than one app at a time, those cores come into play there as well.
Red Rocket won't care where the files are sourced don't think much... The speed of those drives matters most likely, but nothing else would make a difference don't think.
Jerry

Raid storage usage and block size

We have two XServe RAID units Raid 5 and we are adding a new 16 bay ACNC raid with 16 1.5TB drives in Raid 6 + Hot Spare. I initialized the Raid 6 with 128K block size. The total data moving from the older raid volumes is around 5.7TB, but on the new Raid it is taking around 7.4TB of space. Is this due to the 128K block size? This is a prepress server so most of the files are quite large, but there may be lots of small files as well.

Hi
RAID 0 does indeed offer best performance, however if any one drive of the striped set fails you will lose all your data. If you have not considered a backup strategy now would be the time to do so. For redundancy RAID 1 Mirror might be a better option as this will offer a safety net in case of a single drive failure. A RAID is not a backup and you should always consider a workable backup strategy.
Purchase another 2x1TB drives and you could consider a RAID 10? Two Stripes mirrored.
Not all your files will be large ones as I'm guessing you'll be using this workstation for the usual mundane matters such as email etc? Selecting a larger block size with small file sizes usually decreases performance. You have to consider all applications and file sizes, in which case the best block size would be 32k.
My 2p
Tony

TS130-1105​1CU Raid Storage Console

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

TS130-11051CU Raid Storage Console