TTG Selection Gallery 2.0 released

Question

TTG Selection Gallery has been updated to 2.0. This is a major update and marks the gallery's transition to a Lua architecture. The gallery utilizes TTG Slimbox Gallery 2.24 as a foundation, and therefore exists in feature parity with that version, supporting annotations, color labels, ratings, ID plate, a wealth of customization options and more.
TTG Selection Gallery is constructed with the photographer-client relationship in mind. The gallery allows clients to mark selected photos, and to submit them with a message/comments to the photographer as an email form. Selections and then be easily isolated in the LR Library using by copying and pasting and selected filenames en masse into the Library's Find pane.
The gallery employs Slimbox, allowing clients to view large-size images in an overlay without disrupting their selections.
Get it:
http://theturninggate.net/blog/ttg-selection-gallery
Cheers,
Matthew

Answer 1

Matthew,
As ever, you are correct about the lack of spam resulting from the PHP file.
My next question is, following the discussion with Judith in a
different thread, I can see what she means about the desirability of being able to annotate the thumbnails, however briefly.
I've hacked transformer.xslt thus:
        <tr>
                <td class="imgShadowLeft"></td>
                <td valign="middle" class="checkBoxBg">
                <input type="checkbox" class="checkbox" name="image[]" value="{$filename}"/>
+               <p class="galleryCaption"><xsl:value-of select="$title"/></p>
                </td>
                <td class="imgShadowRight"></td>
        </tr>
and now it adds the content of the web module title field in below the pictures. So by editing the web title field I can put in more or less anything, and of course turn it on and off.
However, try as I might I can't typeset it using the <ag:formatted> method that appears in the same thread referenced above.
I realise it gets used as the "alt" field for the images in the thumbnail view, I'm more than happy to hack that to just the filename for my purposes; am I missing something about why I can't typeset it?
I tried the same trick in Slimbox and it works but it rather upsets the proportions a bit, so I doubt I'll ever use it. However, it could be a "feature for the next release"; I like it because it means I can use the Web Module Title field for the thumbnail caption and the Web Module Caption field for the preview caption, either or both of which can contain the actual image caption and/or title.
I think it's a good step in flexibility, anyway! I'll be continuing to hack and dabble at it, but my question about typesetting it remains!
Damian