TU Go for Web BETA trial - Feedback thread

Hi guys,
The TU Go have launched a new web-based version of TU Go as part of a\ BETA trial that you can get involved in.
All you need to do is log onto https://go.tu.com/#/ via your browser* and sign in as you would when using the app. You can even sign up to TU Go there too if you have not already and find out more about TU Go Explore; A new project that allows members like you to more easily report feedback on upcoming updates.
This thread is here for you to feedback on the new version and let us know how its working for you.
Some more info here
*TU Go for Web will work Google Chrome, FireFox and Opera browsers for now

Great idea poorly implemented! I'm not sure why I'd ever want to see five conversations side by side, but I do know that I'd like a "delete" button, and I'd like a "help" page which explains the cute but meaningless colour coding of the icons. (How about an option for using "words" rather than icons!) (I mean a real "Help" page - not a link to the useless page on the O2 web site which just tells you all the things you already know about TuGo before you install it!) I'd like to be able to select multiple messages and calls, and delete them at once - but you can't do that on the app, so why would I expect it on the web version. I'd like "hover" text which explains what buttons do (isn't that essential for "disability friendly" web sites?) I'd like to sort my texts according to the sender, or do a "find" for a particular contact or number, rather than have this long list of mixed calls and texts down the left hand side of the screen. Apparently TuGo doesn't work on IE11 because of the "advanced connectivity" that TuGo requires!! They're having a laugh, right? I'm still looking for any signs of "advanced connectivity", but all I see is a fairly basic website - maybe Chrome hides the advanced features?? Like the Windows Desktop App, and the Windows Mobile App (and I can't imagine the iOS versions are very different), the web version is a great idea, poorly executed. Have the developers ever bothered to sit down with a group of "first time" users to see how easy they find TuGo to use? I doubt it very much! TuGo has fantastic potential as a really useful add on for O2 customers, but every time I use it (and I've now used it on iPad, phone, desktop App and browser based App), it leaves me frustrated. If it wasn't for the fact that sometimes it pulls me out of a hole (WiFi available when there's no mobile signal!), I'd never ever use it.

Similar Messages

Skype for web (Beta) on the way

http://blogs.skype.com/2014/11/14/please-welcome-skype-for-web-beta/
A possible bone tossed to PB users when this is available? (May work with Origami browser set to a user agent of one of the supported platforms.) Won't get my hopes up, but we shall see...

Hi and welcome to the Skype Community,
Once the product will be available to a larger group we'll open up a dedicated community section, yes.
Meanwhile please share your feedback here if you are part of the beta: http://community.skype.com/t5/Other-features/Skype-for-Web-Beta-announced/td-p/3774119
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

Skype for Web (Beta) announced

Last week we've announced beta availability of Skype for Web which will make it quicker and easier than ever before to connect with friends, family and colleagues around the world, for free – directly from Skype.com. Read all the details about it in our blog post here: http://blogs.skype.com/2014/11/14/please-welcome-skype-for-web-beta/
The highlights are:
Get chatting straight away
You can use Skype for Web without having to download an app before you get started, which means anyone new to Skype can get chatting even faster. Simply sign in to Skype for Web on Skype.com and you’ll be able to connect and start instant messaging directly from your browser.
Connect from anywhere
You can connect to Skype for Web from Internet Explorer, Chrome on Windows, Firefox or Safari on your computer – so whichever browser you prefer, Skype.com is the place to go for all your calls and messaging.
Bringing voice, video and instant messaging to Skype.com
Once you’ve signed in on Skype.com, you can start instant messaging friends straight away. Making great quality voice or video calls is just as easy; simply press the call button to connect. As you may have read in the last few weeks, Skype and our friends at Internet Explorer are starting to implement the technology to make Real-Time Communications (RTC) on the web a reality, but for now, before your first call, you’ll need to install a small plug-in to start your conversation. In the future, using Skype on the web will become even easier and convenient. Imagine you wanted to meet your child’s teacher, or conduct an online interview with a potential candidate -you’ll be able to chat over Skype directly from a browser in just a click. With WebRTC, there won’t be any downloads or installs – you can just get straight to your conversation.
While that work continues, look out for access to Skype for Web on Skype.com in the coming weeks – give it a try and let us know what you think here on the community and through the feedback links in Skype for Web.
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

Hi everyone,
Thanks for all your interest. We are currently in an invite only beta phase. If you are part of the beta you will see a link at your Skype web account page at www.skype.com/go/myaccount
We are extending the beta group step by step based on the feedback and healthy metrics we see on the current usage. Meanwhile you can use the Skype integration on www.Outlook.com
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

How do I turn off skype for web (beta) when I log-in to my outlook email

I've noticed in the past couple of days that when I log-in to my outlook email page that it shows the new 'skype for web (beta) icon at the top right of the messenger pane instead of the old message link. How do I turn this off and go back to the old version as I don't like the new skype for web and much prefer the old style message pane? I have noted that when I open my People page or OneDrive page that the old version still shows there, so why can't I turn it off in my email page and go back to the original pane? I would appreciate some help and advice on this. Thanks.

Hi Claudius,, Thanks for replying. You asked what I preferred about the old message pane. I just preferred how it looked. You could see automatically from your contact list who was online as the call/video icons showed clearly beside their name and if you simply wanted to send an IM, you just selected the contact and the IM box would appear at the bottom. I just don't like how the new skype for web looks at the side of your Outlook email page as I don't like the layout. I know it all comes down to personal preference and mine is for the old version. I don't understand why they have to keep making changes to things. The way I see it is, if something isn't broke, why break it? The old version worked perfectly well and I preferred it but we, the users, don't get a say in anything because the people who make these decisions just go ahead and change things no matter what. Thanks for clearing this up for me. I had hoped you could just turn it off and revert back to the old message pane but you say this isn't possible which is unfortunate. Regards, Linda

RE: Skype for Web (Beta) is now available to every...

Any update as to when Web.skype.com will work for Chromebooks?
I receive page: https://web.skype.com/en/wrongDevice
Sorry, Skype for Web (Beta) isn’t available on this device yet. Please try it on your desktop computer instead.

Please try Skype for Web again on your Chromebook now. It should work (without calling obviously since there's not plugin available).
Follow the latest Skype Community News
↓ Did my reply answer your question? Accept it as a solution to help others, Thanks. ↓

Skype for Web (Beta) Mutil problems on Windows 10. 10041.

Is Windows 10 TP, and Internet Explorer 11 compatable with this Skype for web? (Beta). I'm tring to pin the Skype for web beta onto my taskbar. My OS is Windows 10 TP build 10041, and I'm using internet explorer 11. When i try and pin the site to the taskbar i get this message: "This file does not have a program associated with it for performing this action. Please install a program or if one is already installed, create an association in, the default programs control panel". The Skype web plugin in installed on my PC. I have restarted my PC, but i still get the same message. When i use the skype for web beta, i get this message:"You will need the plugin to make audio, and video calls, get the plugin".

I was unable to see your images. I took the time to reinstall my 10 TP since the graphics crashed and even safe mode low resolution (VGA mode) didn't work and on top of that I had no restore points. After I updated my machine to your build I could see what was occurring. Skype for web beta works just fine in that build for me. I was able to call my other machine with video and audio which is surprising because my onboard camera worked without having to do the same manipulations I had to do in Windows 8.1. I generally never pin items to my taskbar in any OS but these are my observations: 1. Items pinned to the taskbar have a .website extension. Even though it has IE defined as the default program, it is apparent to me that the pinning portion of the taskbar is broken for now in that build of Windows 10. The error happens with every pinned website that I tried so that means it's a Technical preview bug and not a Skype for Web beta one. Not surprising since it's not a released OS. 2. If you want it to work you should create a shortcut (.url) to http://web.skype.com and no other version of that url (unless it contains login.skype.com) since you will skip authentication causing it to error out with an "oops". Even if you were to grab a working .website shortcut and pin that to your taskbar, it still wouldn't work since pinning is broken. 3. You can pin the .URL shortcut by dragging it to the taskbar and it will pin itself as a child process of Internet Explorer. 4. If the plugin isn't working make sure that you are using IE and not some other browser. I personally haven't tested it in other browsers but that could be the issue. 5. Make sure the Windows firewall or any other security software isn't blocking the plugin install or execution.

General PlayStationNow Private Beta Trial Discussion Thread

Code redemption and installation all worked fine. Internet connection is quick enough as well. It's been a while since I played any PS3 game, but will give Arkham City a blast later on.

diehardest13 wrote:
Just got the invite but on holiday in sunny bognor Regis at the moment. Will the beta stretch to the PS vita one day? Also I'm guessing a Ethernet connection would be better but last time I tried one it wouldn't connect to the internet.
Hi diehardest13,
Ethernet connect is always the preferential method of connectivity, however, recently some routers provide a dual band service where the 5Ghz Wi-Fi connection allows for much better performance.
If you choose to use a wireless connection, the 5Ghz connectivity would be the recommended option.
There are also a few other points to consider:
* The distance your PS4 is from the router which provides the Wi-Fi connection.
* Other devices using the internet at the same time may reduce your connection bandwidth
* Interference from external sources
Regarding the beta moving across to our PS Vita platform, I cannot confirm this will happen during the life cycle of the beta. Please keep an eye out on our official channels for more information on this.
I hope the above has been of helpful nature and look forward to seeing your complete feedback via our feedback forms.
Regards
KC_KAOS

I don't know if I am invited to Skype for Web (Bet...

It says on my homepage that I can launch skype for web, but when I get there the error page shows up.

Short answer, it's ok to leave it plugged in most of the time. But it's good to use the battery somewhat, too.
Long answer:
http://www.apple.com/batteries/notebooks.html
charlie

Requests to improve Skype for Web

Hello everyone. Skype for Web (Beta) seems quite decent for the time being.BUT! I got two requests for this, and I do hope it'll be seriously considered and fixed by the team in a short time: Skype for Web Beta propose a Chrome plugin when being used from Opera. Please propose a simpler way for Opera 15+ users to install the plugin (so that newcomers using this browser won't have a "hard" time figuring out how to do so).Skype for Web Beta, Skype Modern and Skype from Outlook share the same issue: We can't change our status to Busy or Away. Is it so hard to provide them? Please add them :/ Otherwise, it can be useful, so thanks for your hard work anyway, and have a good day everyone.

I would check the web skype historic somewhere in the c: the machine eg in the folder " % temp % " for the company to use the skype app just that some older machines are complaining of memory because it is very heavy for them ... one of the fulga options that I found was the web skype but the only problem I found was that there's no way we monitor the message traffic as we made already ...

Which way to get image for webi report?

Hi,
I have to add image to webi report. So any way is there for adding image for webi intelligence.

check this thread:
Adding an image (logo) to webi report

Skype for Web on PowerPC

I have an old G4 PowerBook running MacOSX 10.5 (Leopard) and since the Skype app is not longer working i thought id try Skype for Web. Is this possible on my PowerBook?

Safari 6 and above requested, according to == http://blogs.skype.com/2014/11/14/please-welcome-skype-for-web-beta/ ==
So...
On ne regarde pas l'avenir dans un rétroviseur !
IMac Intel Core i3 3.2 GHz - RAM 12 GB - OS 10.10.3
Skype 7.8.391
Logitech usb headset or Jabra 250 bt

Apple discontinued its iWork Beta trial which allowed for the placement of documents on the web and provide others the ability to read, edit and download no matter their software. Is there a replacement product?

Apple discontinued its iWork Beta trial which allowed for the placement of documents on the web and provide others the ability to read, edit and download no matter their software. Is there a replacement product?

No.

Why does the Fireworks save for web function give better results than in Photoshop?

Having used the trial version of Fireworks, I have noticed that the save for web function gives greater compression and image quality than saving for web in Photoshop. Why is this?
As Adobe are not continuing in developing Fireworks, does anyone know if will they will improve the save for web function in Photoshop to match the Fireworks version?
Are there any third party companies who anyone can recommend who will process large volumes of images for web?
Thanks

One of my favourite topics ;-P
First, the save for web function in Photoshop has not seen any real updates in a long time. In Fireworks PNG export allows for fully transparent optimized files with indexed 256 or less colours, which is impossible in the save for web function in Photohop. It is unsupported.
This is one of the reasons why Fireworks does a much better job than Photoshop. Another reason is that Photoshop adds meta junk in its exported files, and this also increases the file size (and should be removed, because there are also a number of fields which include information about your setup).
One other caveat is that Photoshop's save for web functions neither allows for a choice in chroma subsampling, and instead decides automatically below a certain quality threshold to degrade the colour sharpness quality. The user has no control over this. (Fireworks also limits the user this way.)
One thing to be careful of: FW's jpg quality setting, and PS's quality settings are very different - a 50 in Photoshop is not the same 50 setting in Fireworks.
For jpg optimization I generally use RIOT (free): http://luci.criosweb.ro/riot/
(When you install, be careful NOT to install the extra junkware!)
Fireworks cannot change the chroma subsampling to 4:2:0, which does degrade the quality a bit compared to RIOT and Photoshop in my experience. Photoshop adds useless meta information, even if the user tells it not to do that. RIOT allows you to remove that information, saving 6k. RIOT also offers an automatic mode that optimizes existing jpg images without degrading the quality further, and often saves 10k or more, depending on the images.
Interestingly enough, in my tests exported Fireworks jpg images are always reduced in file size by RIOT, due to FW's jpg export limitations, without any image degradation.
In my tests FW's jpg quality versus file size turns out to be the worst of all three. RIOT generally wins, or is at least on par with Photoshop.
As for PNG export, Photoshop's save for web function is quite abysmal. No 256 colour full transparency export is possible, while Fireworks does support this.
Having said that, there is a free alternative that leaves both Photoshop AND Fireworks in the dust: Color Quantizer. http://x128.ho.ua/color-quantizer.html
CQ is an amazing little tool: with it anyone can create PNG files with full transparency and reduced to ANY number of colours! It means that a 512 colour PNG with full transparency is now very easy to do. On top of that, for more difficult images a simple quality mask brush tool allows the user to control and retain even small colour details in a PNG, while reducing the file size to an absolute minimum.
CQ is one of the best kept secrets of a Web Developer's toolkit. And it is free!
Both RIOT and Color Quantizer have a built-in batch mode. Both are available for WIndows. Not for Mac. If you are on a Mac, try imageOptim. Not nearly as good as RIOT and CQ, but quite passable.
PS to be fair, the newest versions of Photoshop do allow for export of 8bit PNGs with full transparency through the use of its Generator functionality. But again, it cannot compete with CQ. And as far as I am aware, Generator cannot be used in Photoshop's batch processing (which, btw, is very slow! For simpler daily image processing tasks I have to do in batches, I prefer IrfanView, which is lightning fast! IrfanView).

Is Fw really better for web graphics?

Ok, so I've downloaded the Fw trial to see how it's better
for web graphics than Photoshop. With Photoshop the usual problem
is that I have to mess around to turn on/off layers, copy parts of
images into new images to export transparent logos, tabs etc. so I
hoped that Fw have some intelligent slice system for one step
exports. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find it. Maybe I'm
wrong but it seems to me that Fw has a very primitive flat slicing
system, no overlapping is possible. So for a very basic example if
I have a background graphics on the top of the page that I want to
export (not the entire page) and a logo *on* it that I want to
export as a transparent png or maybe just as a jpg including the
background, it's impossible, because the logo slice will divide the
page into rectangles no matter what. I don't care about
HTML/CSS/whatever I just want to export overlapping graphic parts
in one simple step by properly defined slices. Looks like I
couldn't find the one step solution I hoped for in Fw. Am I missing
something?

I. G. wrote:
> Ok, so I've downloaded the Fw trial to see how it's
better for web graphics
> than Photoshop. With Photoshop the usual problem is that
I have to messing
> around to turn on/off layers, copy parts of images into
new images to export
> transparent logos etc. so I hoped that Fw have some
intelligent slice system
> for one step exports. Unfortunately I haven't been able
to find it. Maybe I'm
> wrong but it seems to me that Fw has a very primitive
flat slicing system, no
> overlapping is possible. So for a very basic example if
I have a background
> graphics on the top of the page that I want to export
(not the entire page) and
> a logo *on* it that I want to export as a transparent
png or maybe just as a
> jpg including the background, it's impossible, because
the logo slice will
> divide the page into rectangles no matter what. I don't
care about
> HTML/CSS/whatever I just want to export overlapping
graphic slices in one
> simple step by properly defined slices. Looks like I
couldn't find the one step
> solution I hoped for in Fw. Am I missing something?
>
>
>
>
>
In a word. Yes. It's designed to work with screen graphics,
and handles
both vector and bitmaps well at the same time. It's got quite
a few
more web-centric workflows than Photoshop.
Fireworks CS3 supports multiple pages. Each page supports
it's own web
layer, so you have much more control over slices and can
avoid the
problems of overlapping slices this way.
Overlapping slices don't work because it's impossible for FW
to
determine which one is the most important - and should be
sliced in whole
>>So for a very basic example if I have a background
> graphics on the top of the page that I want to export
(not the entire
page) and
> a logo *on* it that I want to export as a transparent
png or maybe
just as a
> jpg including the background, it's impossible, because
the logo slice
will
> divide the page into rectangles no matter what.<<
I'm not clear on what you're trying to do here as you seemed
to have
left some information out. Assuming you want a repeating
background
image and as separate slice for the logo.
Draw a slice that covers the width of your background, by
however many
pixels tall you need. Either lower on the page or on a
separate page
plave the logo and slice it as well. As you are not concerned
about the
html or CSS it's pretty straightforward from there. Just
export the
slices, and tell FW not to include unsliced areas. In your
html, set you
background image as a background image and your logo either
as an inline
image or as a background image within another containing div.
HTH
Jim Babbage - .:Community MX:. & .:Adobe Community
Expert:.
http://www.communityMX.com/
CommunityMX - Free Resources:
http://www.communitymx.com/free.cfm
.:Adobe Community Expert for Fireworks:.
Adobe Community Expert
http://tinyurl.com/2a7dyp
See my work on Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jim_babbage/

Ive downloaded csk6 design and web premium trial its asking for serial number

I've downloaded cs6 design and web premium trial its asking for serial number, WHERE DO I GET SERIEL NUMBER FOR TRIAL

There are no serials for trials. it simply has expired. Read this:
Adobe trial software expired early
Mylenium

TU Go for Web BETA trial - Feedback thread

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for