Turbolinux 8 for AMD64 and 32bit oracle9i

Anybody have installed oracle 9.2.0.1.0 on Turbolinux 8 for AMD64 ? I tried it,but i never succeed.
When i began to install,it showed error"can't find libjava.so".When i set the parameter JAVA_HOME,the error still appeared.Please give me some advice,thanks!

I have Oracle Enterprise Edition loaded on dual processor Pentium 133 with 128MB ram running Slackware 8.1.
It installed with no problems. Oracle 8.1.7 is a different story though.

Similar Messages

TurboLinux 8 for AMD64 and Oracle 9i

I'm a home user that uses Oracle 9i for development learning for work. I currently use SuSE 8.2 Pro for my Oracle 9i development on a dual AMD MP4200; however, I now have a dual Opteron 240 system. The only affordable Linux distros that support the Opteron system I have (Tyan Thunder K8W) is TurboLinux 8 for AMD64.
I cannot find anything about the ease or difficulties for install Oracle 9i for AMD64 (Developer's Edition for Linux) on this distro. It's rather effortless on SuSE 8.2 Pro and I have installed Oracle 9i on a Solaris 8 server at work. Does anyone know if it's a waste of my money to try to install on this distro? I thought this distro was considered one of the better ones.

I have Oracle Enterprise Edition loaded on dual processor Pentium 133 with 128MB ram running Slackware 8.1.
It installed with no problems. Oracle 8.1.7 is a different story though.

Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux AS for Oracle9i Database

I put together a step-by-step guide for tuning and optimizing Red Hat Linux Advanced Server for Oracle9i. It's my first draft version and I would appreciate any comments and feedback.
The article
"Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux Advanced Server for Oracle9i Database"
can be found at:
http://www.puschitz.com/TuningLinuxForOracle.shtml
The article
"Oracle 9i Installation on Red Hat Linux 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, and on Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1"
can now be found at http://www.puschitz.com/InstallingOracle9i.shtml
And both links for
"Oracle on Red Hat Linux"
can be found at
http://www.puschitz.com/OracleOnLinux.shtml
Werner

Is this good for Redhat Linux 9.0 and not just the advanced server.
If it is not could you please provide me the links to articles like,
"Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux for Oracle9i Database"
"Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux for Oracle9i App Server"
"Guide for Tuning and Optimizing Red Hat Linux for Oracle9i Infrastucture"
Thanks.

Configuring dynamically loaded VI's search directory for both 64 and 32bit

Background:
I have an application that has been developed, built in LV2012 32bit. It needs to run on a 32bit and 64bit machine (Win7, I understand the application itself will only ever be 32bit, but it needs to run in both environments). The application dynamically loads a bunch of VI's which are raw vi's on disk (think just copy directory of files over from developer machine to the target machine that already has a exe running -- and just a copy, not a build of any sort). All of these dyanamically loaded vi's at some point reference vi.lib, so I have a few things I need to do to the application to get it to work
a) within the .ini file for the running exe viSearchPath=......C:\Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2012\<<bunch of directories>>\*
b) within the VI object cache directory, I have a lvDistPath.txt file that includes C:\Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2012
This works just fine for when I deploy these files and run the application on a 64bit version of Win7. However, when I try to run the application on a 32bit version of Win7, it breaks -- LabVIEW is installed in C:\Program Files\.... (no (x86)).
I am stuck with the dynamic loading architecture we have, and I can't start making changes to my code because it's not my code that is specifying where to find the files -- it's LabVIEW's internal searching algorithm.
What can I do (short of managing two separate .ini & .txt configuration files, one set each for x86 and 64bit and managing two separate installers) to get around this problem?

It sounds like you really don't have a problem with a 32 bit app vs. a 64 bit app. It sounds like a problem with file paths being different on a 32 bit app on 32 bit windows vs. a 32 bit app on 64 bit windows.
Two things you could do.
1. (Not sure this would work.) Put 2 paths in the search directory, one for c:\program files path for 32 bit windows, and one for c:\program files (x86) for 64 bit windows. One or the other will exist. I don't know if something will hangup if it searches the other path that doesn't exist.
2. Since you are dynamically loading the VI's, you should specify the path when you are dynamically loading them rather than having LV search for them. There is a function called Get System Info in the File I/O >> File Constants palette that will return the path to the Program Files folder for you environment so that you can build on that to get to your dynamic VI path.

Copliling Solaris kernel module code in 64bit for AMD64

Hi,
I have solaris10 OS in my HP ProLiant DL-145 server machine
I m using SunStudio C compiler (cc) for compling my kernel module source code. My code is successfully work in 32bit kernel mode. But when i boot the OS in 64bit mode & complile the same code , then no error during compliaion & linking. but my module doesn't work. When i add two flags
-xarch=amd64 -xmodel=kernel , then also no error during compilation, but module still not work.
I want to know , how i can complie my soruce code successfully in 64bit kernel for AMD64, so that it can be loaded successfully through modload command.
I think i need some other flags for that, pls help.

from
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-5789/6ml7kh1b4?q=amd64&a=view
Compiling with Sun Studio
Use the -D_KERNEL option to indicate that this code defines a kernel module.
If you are compiling for a 64-bit x86 architecture, use both the -xarch=amd64 option and the -xmodel=kernel option:
% cc -D_KERNEL -xarch=amd64 -xmodel=kernel -c mydriver.c
% ld -r -o mydriver mydriver.o
tim

Cs5 update only for mac and w64 ?

Hi
i read the bugs fixed but they are only for mac and windows 64bit
is there at least some improvement or bug fixed for the 32bit?
thanks

Hi,
I know of a few fixes which affected Win 32 bit (x86).
regards,
steve

Oracle 10.2.0.3 Full Client for Windows 2003 32bit

Hello,
I know this is a stupid question, but I cannot seem to find the download for the full client for 10.2.0.3 for Windows 2003 32bit server. I have found the instant client, but not the full client.
Thanks in advance.
Brian

Hi Zekmoe,
do you have the PATCHES tab in Metalink (metalink.oracle.com)?
If not, please check your PROFILE in metalink - if PATCHES and UPDATES says: NO, then please contact your administrator (mentioned also in your PROFILE) to enable the patch download.
If you'll have the PATCHES tab then go to QUICK LINKS in the patch screen and choose Windows 32bit and 10.2.0.3
Hope this helps - kind regards
Mike

Feedback on amazonmp3 for amd64

Hey folks, I've put together an amazonmp3 pkgbuild for amd64 machines and I'd like to get some feedback and help polishing it. It grabs the packages required from the ubuntu repositories and puts everything into /opt/amazonmp3/. There's also a script /usr/bin/amazonmp3 that sets environmentals and calls the binary in opt.
Currently I'm not sure if I got all the dependencies correct and several of the files installed I just stole from the current amazonmp3 pkgbuild.
Not sure why the current amazonmp3 build has x86_64 in arch since it points the boost stuff at /usr/lib and I'm fairly sure we don't have lib32- for boost and gtkmm.
In any case, once verified I haven't done anything stupid I'll put this up on aur.
It seems okay as I've tested it on my machine and successfully downloaded an album.
# Contributor: Chris Schwaab christopher.schwaab gmail
pkgname=amazonmp3-amd64
pkgver=1.0.3
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="The MP3 downloader with self contained library deps for amd64."
url="http://www.amazon.com/gp/dmusic/help/amd.html"
arch=('x86_64')
license=('custom')
depends=('bash' 'lib32-libxdamage' 'lib32-curl' 'lib32-pango' 'lib32-gtk2')
makedepends=('deb2targz')
provides=('amazonmp3')
conflicts=('amazonmp3')
source=('http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/main/g/gtkmm2.4/libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a_2.12.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb'
'http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/main/c/cairomm/libcairomm-1.0-1_1.2.4-2_i386.deb'
'http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/main/g/glibmm2.4/libglibmm-2.4-1c2a_2.14.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb'
'http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsigc++-2.0/libsigc++-2.0-0c2a_2.0.17-2ubuntu2_i386.deb'
'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/b/boost/libboost-date-time1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb'
'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/b/boost/libboost-signals1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb'
'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/b/boost/libboost-iostreams1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb'
'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/b/boost/libboost-thread1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb'
'http://amazonm-002.vo.llnwd.net/u/d1/clients/amazonmp3_1.0.3~gutsy_i386.deb'
'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/b/bzip2/libbz2-1.0_1.0.4-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb')
md5sums=('d3856f10fdecee58656263157ab3b68d'
'dcc40c10a2ae127e088db9ec08d91e7e'
'cd8ac50ac2347e9d9408eab68501c5cc'
'3730b46f495a27598966a864bea8a0ca'
'0ecf7a773aec14a63e1b7c7169a72c22'
'ea127e805b17bfc616794c6860bc8304'
'b9415e35d293f5f28d340cb5fb63d34e'
'6a02ddcea0b9bb305bfe5ca9311d223a'
'0a9b986e2e9ba5be7e412e9742688ebb'
'e19195eb92daaa687cb2072672201c25')
build() {
deb2targz libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a_2.12.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb \
libcairomm-1.0-1_1.2.4-2_i386.deb \
libglibmm-2.4-1c2a_2.14.0-0ubuntu1_i386.deb \
libsigc++-2.0-0c2a_2.0.17-2ubuntu2_i386.deb \
libboost-date-time1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb \
libboost-signals1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb \
libboost-iostreams1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb \
libboost-thread1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb \
libbz2-1.0_1.0.4-0ubuntu2.1_i386.deb \
amazonmp3_1.0.3~gutsy_i386.deb
tar -xzf libgtkmm-2.4-1c2a_2.12.0-0ubuntu1_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libcairomm-1.0-1_1.2.4-2_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libglibmm-2.4-1c2a_2.14.0-0ubuntu1_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libsigc++-2.0-0c2a_2.0.17-2ubuntu2_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libboost-date-time1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libboost-signals1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libboost-iostreams1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libboost-thread1.34.1_1.34.1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.tar.gz
tar -xzf libbz2-1.0_1.0.4-0ubuntu2.1_i386.tar.gz
tar -zxf amazonmp3_1.0.3~gutsy_i386.tar.gz
mkdir -p $pkgdir/opt/amazonmp3
mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/share/doc/amazonmp3
mkdir -p $pkgdir/usr/share/mime-info/
tar -cf - -C lib ./ | tar -xf - -C $pkgdir/opt/amazonmp3
tar -cf - -C usr/lib ./ | tar -xf - -C $pkgdir/opt/amazonmp3
cat > amazonmp3 <<__EOF__
#!/bin/bash
export GTK_PATH=/opt/lib32/usr/lib/gtk-2.0
export GDK_PIXBUF_MODULE=/opt/lib32/config/gdk/gdk-pixbuf.loaders
export PANGO_RC_FILE=/opt/lib32/config/pango/pangorc
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/lib32/usr/lib:/opt/amazonmp3:\$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
/opt/amazonmp3/amazonmp3
__EOF__
install -D -m644 usr/share/doc/amazonmp3/license.html \
$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/amazonmp3-amd64/license.html
install -D -m755 amazonmp3 $pkgdir/usr/bin/amazonmp3
install -D -m755 usr/bin/amazonmp3 $pkgdir/opt/amazonmp3/amazonmp3
install -D -m644 usr/share/applications/amazonmp3.desktop \
$pkgdir/usr/share/applications/amazonmp3.desktop
install -D -m644 usr/share/doc/amazonmp3/* \
$pkgdir/usr/share/doc/amazonmp3
install -D -m644 usr/share/mime/packages/amazonmp3.xml \
$pkgdir/usr/share/mime/packages/amazonmp3.xml
install -D -m644 usr/share/mime-info/* \
$pkgdir/usr/share/mime-info/
install -D -m644 usr/share/mimelnk/audio/x-amzxml.desktop \
$pkgdir/usr/share/mimelnk/audio/x-amzxml.desktop
install -D -m644 usr/share/pixmaps/amazonmp3.png \
$pkgdir/usr/share/pixmaps/amazonmp3.png
Thanks.
Last edited by lpjhjdh (2008-12-14 18:52:44)

Hey thanks a lot! I've now removed everything that I previously needed a chroot for!
The only issue with the PKGBUILD was that it didn't automatically download and install the dependencies: aka deb2targz, lib32-curl, etc. It just stopped with a "ERROR Could not resolve all dependencies". But as soon as I installed them manually, the rest of the PKGBUILD worked great!
Thanks! Look forward to seeing it in the AUR!
Scott

Feature Request: Exporting to Photoshop at gamma 1.0 and 32bit resolution

Hi,
In terms of maximum fidelity, it'd be nice if Lightroom had a setting to tell it to hand of copies of photos to Photoshop at gamma 1.0 or Lightroom's native profile (which is apparently also based on gamma 1.0), and 32bit resolution, so that maximum fidelity is guaranteed. I feel the current settings are restrictive, and while I can retroactively change the edited image to gamma 1.0, I'm exporting a 16bit image from LR to Photoshop. Depending on how creative someone goes on the sliders and tone curve, eventual color banding may happen when converting between color profiles.
Thanks for considering,
-mg

Interesting responses everybody. I do think LR is a good program as I have been using the beta as well as Aperture and comparing the two. Extensis Portfolio , although not a "developing" program from the beginning had no size limitation in its cataloging. It extracted(or created) a thumbnail, generated jpg previews and automatically updated changes to files each time the program was started. In contextual menus you could export a copy, open in PS, and various other commands right out of the program without hogging memory. Nobody has offered an educated reason for the size limitation. Can it not manage memory ? Ok, maybe not, but that doesn't mean it couldn't at least catalog the large files. If this is the case , my suggestion would be to implement a "lock out" feature that would not let you "develop" large files in LR but could still generate and update thumbnails and allow you to organize them within your filing system. Then you could at least manage versions and changes within LR with out having to switch to Bridge or the like. Making JPG versions is not a good workaround.. to assume people only have a "few" large files to keep track is very one-dimensional thinking. I personally know of several mural photographers that work exclusively with digital cameras/backs , are they not considered a valued target market for LR ?

Qosmio F60-11F - Drivers for Windows 7 32bit

Hi .
I have Qosmio F60-11F and I install windows 7 ultimate 32bit , and I am facing a problem with all drivers.
I search in support driver section in site of Toshiba, but I found only bluetooth, also I need power managment for Windows 7 32bit.
thanx

Hey,
As far as I know Qosmio F60 is preinstalled with Windows 7 64bit...
That means you have installed 32bit version of Windows 7 but why? Normally 64bit OS is the future and supports only 4GB or more RAM. 32bit is pretty outdated for such a new high performance notebook
I think this is the reason why you cant get all drivers on official Toshiba page because its designed for 64bit OS only
If you really want 32bit you must search for drivers yourself on external websites.

Any Oracle database personal edition certified for Windows 7/32bit?

Is any Oracle database Personal edition certified for Windows 7/32bit? I spent an hour at least searching for this but no chance.
Thank you.

Currently, only 11gR2 and 10.2.0.5 are certified on Win 7 Professional or higher - Home versions are not supported.
HTH
Srini

64 bit IAS 10.1.2 for AMD64/EM64t

Is there a 64bit version of IAS 10.1.2/3 for AMD64/EM64T or are we still running 32bit verison of the software on a 64bit OS??

Hi,
Below links might help you -
11g certification matrix - 'http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/fusion-certification-100350.html'
10g certification matrix - 'http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/idm-certification-101401-083012.html'
-- Pramod Aravind

Strip ppc and 32bit from an AudioUnit: .rsrc file problem!

Hi all,
for some internal tests on my DAW I need to strip out the ppc and 32bit code from an AudioUnit I bought.
Using Lipo I stripped off the ppc and i386 architectures from the Contents/MacOs/Executable file, that now is only x86_64
The problem I'm left with is the .rsrc file that still contains probably data related to an Executable ppc/32/64. I don't have obviously the original .r file, but I suppose there's a way I can edit it or recreate it. The final dlle and STR are the problem, but I cannot edit it properly or recreate it.
Any idea?
Using DeRez -useDF I obtained this (I change all plugin name with -):
data 'STR ' (1000, purgeable) {
          $"1650 5350 6175 6469 6F77 6172 653A 2050"            /* .------------- - */
          $"5350 2045 6368 6F"                                  /* -- ---- */
data 'STR ' (1001, purgeable) {
          $"0445 6368 6F"                                       /* .---- */
data 'dlle' (1000) {
          $"5653 5432 4155 456E 7472 7900"                      /* -----------. */
data 'thng' (1000, "------------: --- ----") {
          $"6175 6678 5050 6543 5053 5061 0000 0000"            /* aufxPPeCPSPa.... */
          $"0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 5354 5220 03E8"            /* ..........STR .? */
          $"5354 5220 03E9 0000 0000 0000 0001 0001"            /* STR .?.......... */
          $"0000 0009 0000 0000 0003 1000 0000 646C"            /* ...?..........dl */
          $"6C65 03E8 0005 1000 0000 646C 6C65 03E8"            /* le.?......dlle.? */
          $"0006 1000 0000 646C 6C65 03E8 0008"                 /* ......dlle.?.. */

The .r file (tha compiled becomes .rsrc) is a legacy mechanism to translate a textual resource file .r into the data in the resource fork in the old, pre-OS X Mac way, but that still many use because it makes it simpler to change few things without recompiling everything.
What I showed is the result of a sort of decompiler of .rsrc files, called DeRez, but like a decompiler it makes it easier for me to read than in an hex editor and it helps in some way, but I cannot get back the .r source.
The problem is that this file contains informations telling that the plugin has 3 architectures (32, 64, ppc) and, after striping the plugin binary file to have only the 64bit, I have to modify this .rsrc as well otherwise Logic cannot open the plugin because it cannot find the other two architectures expected from reading the .rsrc

XP 64bit Beta OS for AMD64 - old news?

I'm a 64-bit wannabe, maybe old news, came across this link to get Free *Beta* downloads of either Windows XP 64-BIT Windows Server OR desktop for AMD64, download {90 minutes on DSL} here
I'm learning what i need for my build reading the boards, decided to wait a few months for the socket 939's, PCIExpress, etc, but gee whiz . . .
RexB

Geez SAB, did i really say that, i'm a dunderhead! Howlongagodidiwritethat,omigawdanybodyelseseenit?
Thanks, I added them to "Da List". As i'm digging in reviews and comparison matching and blahblahblah and wasting my meager 56k{42k} bandwidth {waaaa No hi-speed out here in the stix, satellite is price-gouging}
The quote "K8T800 PRO might give you more BIOS options or CPU speed" endquote. What does 'might' mean. If the board gets mad at me it won't give me all it's options?
Don't laugh, some of this stuff is smoke & mirrors. Yes, there is a possibility that shamans have an 'in' to the spirit world, and these "invisible-to-the-naked-eye-millions-of-transistors-and-doped-silicone" might too in their electromagnetic aura {cancer?tumors?}, who knows? I'm not superstitious, just careful about pi***ng the wrong things off.
I'm guessing that cuz i'm not real concerned about advanced graphics or gaming that i wouldn't care if my board was the "K8N for it's AGP/PCI lock". This Anandtech March 23, 2004 test of these chipsets and the N250's predecessor, for what it's worth. Unbelievable the 2nd-to-last last line of 2nd paragraph.
. . .""At launch, there were really just two Athlon 64 chipsets - the nVidia nForce3 150 and VIA K8T800. As we have discussed in reviews of boards based on these chipsets, neither one really meets the specifications that we would like to see in Athlon 64 chipsets. Later, SiS introduced the promising 755 chipset, but no one has brought the kind of 755 boards that we hoped to see to market. In addition, our recent tests of the PCI locks on all 3 Athlon 64 chipsets found that none of them really worked. Given this background, we were more than ready for a new chipset for Athlon 64 that would fix many of the issues.""
Did the K8T800 PRO fix this? blahblahblah then it goes on:
. . .""The non-working PCI lock that we later found on nF3-150 also came as a huge surprise. nVidia tells us, and we did confirm, that the PCI lock does work on the nVidia Reference Board for nF3-150, but they are also aware that it did not work in production nF3-150 motherboards. nVidia assures us that this BIOS programming issue is fixed in nF3-250.""
Can ya' take that to the bank? How many unsuspecting buyerz got that 150 board for the non-functional PCI lock?!?
. . I'm just getting into it, but these are the same chipsets on the market today, two months after the article, right, sans the nF3-150?

Practical approach to using 64bit kernel and 32bit userspace?

I want to run a 64bit kernel on 32bit userspace. I know there are some out there who claim it's only bad and slowing down the transition to full blown 64bit systems. That may be, but for me and for this particular computer, I need to do this.
I have tried it on my work laptop and there are no problems whatsoever: On my plain vanilla 32bit install I downloaded and installed the current 64bit kernel (after carefully backing up the current one). No problems anywhere, so far.
However, for this other machine, I need to have a sane solution for the long run. What about kernel updates? When a new kernel is released, pacman is going to want to install the 32bit one instead of the 64bit version I want to use. I don't suppose there is a way to "tag" the kernel package to be x86_64 instead of i686, or something to that effect?
I'd be happy to hear your thoughts on this.

hw-tph wrote:
flamelab wrote:put kernel26 in HoldPkg and each time it wants to be updated, install the 64bit one.
According to pacman.conf(5), HoldPkg only seems to have any effect when attempting to remove a package:
pacman.conf(5) wrote:HoldPkg = package ...
If a user tries to --remove a package that's listed in HoldPkg, pacman will ask for confirmation before proceeding.
I'll go with the local repository route.
Well, I have pacman on HoldPkg, and I thought that HoldPkg makes the package manager to ask for a package to be installed before the others. It seems that I'm wrong

Turbolinux 8 for AMD64 and 32bit oracle9i

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for