Two dag member no cas array

I have two exchange servers (exchange 2010) in a dag with two databases. The production exchange server and a dr exchange server. Both of the exchange servers have a cas and I have not setup a cas array. I have set the  -RpcClientAccessServer to the
production exchange server.
Is this a valid configuration?
Is it possible to prevent connections to the second exchange server? I find on email headers and on outlook 2010 connection status that there is connections to the second exchange server constantly, even though all mailboxes are on the production server
and  -RpcClientAccessServer is production server.

I will look at creating a CAS array then. I thought i would be able to get away with out it. I think what happened was that after adding the second exchange server i did not update the rpclientaccesserver property to point back to the production server,
for some reason this automatically changed itself to the new exchange server. This means for a few weeks the users were connecting to the DR exchange server over a slow 100mbit link. As soon as i realized that i changed the rpcclientaccesserver property back
to the production CAS on both databases.
I found this http://www.mikepfeiffer.net/2011/04/determine-the-number-of-active-users-on-exchange-2010-client-access-servers-with-powershell/
Very handy powershell script that tells you client connection status to the CAS. currently we have 85 users on production CAS and 20 still on the DR cas even though i set it back to correct CAS over a week ago. Now i need to look at moving these users over
to the correct cas. But thinking might as well wait till we set up CAS array and then change all users that way.
the reason i dont have active active is because its over a 100mbit link and is not as fast as the gigabit we have to the production exchange and is not on as fast storage or hardware. The DR exchange just sits on local storage on one esxi box with one other
server. The rest of our vms are snap mirror across with netapp snap mirror to third party datacenter. In the event of a dr they will supply some new servers for use with the snap mirrored vms.
In the event of a DR situation there is the understanding that it may take a day before we have everything up and running and this is accepted by the client. We are looking at improving this though and would be interested to hear any suggestions regarding
improving exchange dr.
I had some problems with the DAG last month. I had problem seeding one database and finally managed to get that workign and recently had to move the witness to another server as that stopped working with strange error. But now the DAG is 100% healthy with
no issues, i think the 20 random email problem was caused by stuck emails in the users outlook 2010 on xenapp that he never reported, which is another known issue when migrating from outlook 2003-10. Still very concerning however.
It would be very handy if there was some automated way to force outlook to the correct CAS only, say by changing a registry key with group policy. If anyone knows of any way to do that, would be helpful thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Planning for CAS Array with DAG intergation on Exchange 2010

    We currently have 2 Exchange servers and have plans to add 2 more servers so it will be 2 servers with DAG and 2 servers with CAS array
    Here is our current setup: EX01 has HUB, CAS and MAILBOX roles EX02 has MAILBOX only with DAG configured between 2 servers. 
    Should I install another Exchange (EX03) with Mailbox role and remove it from EX01 and then have another EX04 to setup CAS array? What is the best practice ?
    alex serdyukov

    Hi,
    In your case, you can install another Exchange (EX03) with Mailbox role and remove Mailbox role from EX01 and then have another server EX04 to setup CAS array.
    Then you can deploy DAG using server EX02 and EX03, and add server EX01 and EX04 to CAS array.
    Best regards,
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • Migration Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 with CAS Array and DAG

    Dear All,
    I am starting the migration of Exchange 2010 2 servers (CAS/Mailbox) with DAG no CAS Array to Exchange 2013 with 2 servers CAS array and 2 Mailbox servers with DAG. I read on some blogs that no requirement of CAS array on Exchange 2013. My concern how to
    configure NLB on CAS servers for the client to connect.
    Please guide and have any deployment guide for this, kindly share.
    Thanks

    Hi ,
    As you said there is no use and meaning of having the cas array in exchange 2013 and also thanks a lot to Microsoft for introducing an single namespace facility in exchange 2013.
    My suggestion and Microsoft recommendation should be to go with hardware load balancers for exchange 2013 rather than using the windows NLB and round robin method.
    Why we need to go for HLB ?
    Disadvantages
    of some load balancing methods :
    Windows
    NLB :-
    If you use Windows NLB then it can provide redundancy on server level failure and not on application level.
    DNS
    round robin :-
    In case if we use the windows round robin method for load balancing then it wouldn't provide server level
    and application level redundancy during the failures.At the Same time we need to manually adjust the DNS records during the server failure but on the client end dns caches will create the issues.
    Configuring NLB for exchange 2013 : 
    http://msexchangeguru.com/2013/08/14/windowsnlb/
    NLB configurations for exchange 2010 and 2013 will be same.
    Configuring round robin for exchange 2013 : 
    http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-2013-client-access-server-high-availability/
    Advisable method is to have the CAS and MBX roles on the same box if NLB not comes it to play.Because windows failover clustering and NLB cannot be configured on the same box.In exchange 2013 cas role is a stateless server role so there is no need to have
    that role on a separate box.
    Thanks & Regards S.Nithyanandham

  • CAS Array and DAG Site Resiliency (2 Remote Sites via Point to Point Protocol)

    Hi, we are planning to deploy Exchange HA and Site Resiliency but i had some troubles understanding some concepts.
    Out current configurations settings:
    Datacenter A:
    1 MB/CAS/HT (MB01)
    1 CAS (CAS01)
    1 Point to Point link between Datacenter A and Datacenter B (We create a VLAN in the remote datacenter pointing to the Active Directory site where our Exchange server is).
    1 Active Directory Site with 2 Domain controllers (with VLAN 192.1.3.x in Datacenter A and VLAN 192.1.20.x in Datacenter B)
    Datacenter B:
    We want to install a new Exchange CAS Server (CAS02) in VLAN 192.1.20.x, is it posible to create a CAS Array with this configuration considering the replication network for the cluster in the MS Windows Server NLB, so that our Virtual IP of the cluster points
    to 192.1.3.x VLAN? What are the network considerations to the replication and MAPI network between VLANs? Does we need some third party NLB or this could be achieved with MWS2008R2?
    Same configuration for the DAG, with a new server (MB02) just for the MB role. The idea is to remove the CAS role from MB01 and have 2 Exchange Mailbox servers members of the DAG and 2 Exchange CAS Servers members of the CAS Array, so in case of a disaster
    in Datacenter A our clients automatically failover to Datacenter B in this case all of our clients will be pointing to the CAS Array in their Outlook.
    Hope you can help me with this, i don't know if this is possible with our actual infraestructure.
    Best Regards,
    Gerardo

    Thanks Ed, 
    So in that case we will need at least 4 servers in Datacenter A (2 MB members of DAG and 2 CAS/HUB members of the CAS Array) to get a decent HA solution, Am I correct?
    What about the other server in Datacenter B for DR, it will be a passive node or just another multirole server. So in case of DR (Let's say our Datacenter A is totally wrecked) I will need to switchover manually with my DB backups and switchover the user
    mailbox and outlook clients to point to the DR server? I didn´t get the point of the DR server in Datacenter B, can you explain a little bit more?
    I'm totally agree with you about the false positive failovers because our network doesn't meet that requeriments at all.
    Hope you can help me to clear my mind.
    Best Regards,
    Gerardo

  • Can CAS array include server in DR site

    Hi, there:
    Our current Exchange 2010 environment:
    1): Two HUB/CAS Exchange 2010 server running on Windows 2008 R2 use NLB to form a CAS array.
    2): Two Exchange 2010 Mailbox server with one DAG.
    Please note all of these Exchange 2010 servers are on our datacenter, now we would like to add the DR capability to our Exchange environment.
    In regards to the CAS array design for the DR site, is it possible to add one HUB/CAS Exchange 2010 to current CAS/HUB array (this server need to be on SR site), this way when the two HUB/CAS server on the datacentre is not available user can still connect
    the HUB/CAS server on the DR site?
    If the subnet for the Datacentre and DR site is different is this possible?
    If the subnet for the datacenter and DR site is the same is this possible?

    Hi,
    Firstly, I’d like to explain, CAS array’s members cannot be located in different sites. If all CAS servers are in the same site, CAS array can load balance MAPI request.
    And if all mailbox severs are in the same site, DAG can apply failover while it may apply switchover if they are in different sites:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd298067(v=exchg.141).aspx
    A failover is an automatic activation process that can occur at either the database or server level. Switchover is manual activation process.
    If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
    Thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • DAG member, PF database host, and hub maintenance (6hr power-off)

    Hello, 
    We have an EPO test coming up in one of our data centers that requires me to power off 2 of our 4 DAG members. In preparation for this I’ve been reading up on DAG member maintenance best practice as well as deconstructing the Start[Stop]DagServerMaintenance.ps1
    script. After testing in my lab I noticed that the iteration of Suspend-MailboxDatabaseCopy is followed by the parameter -ActivationOnly and sets ActivationSuspended to True. Why only suspend copy activation and not database copy processes? Does the script
    assume that DAG member maintenance does not include server shutdown or is suspending database copy processes not actually necessary? 
    Also, one of the DAG members I have to power off serves 1 of 3 of our PF databases. I’ve noticed that the Start[Stop]DagServerMaintenance.ps1 scripts do nothing for PF databases. Should I just unmount it and rely on standard PF replication to update it when
    I mount it back? Do I need to change my databases over to use a different PF database?
    The power-off duration is 6 hours so I'm not too worried about log build up. Our CAS servers are VMs and will be “motioned” to our other data center. We have two Hub Transport servers, I plan to simply power one of them off. Am I missing anything?
    Thanks!

    Belinda, 
    Your understanding and the article you provided on Managing Database Availability Groups seems to be inline with what I've described. However,
    just our of curiosity can you or anyone else explain why the script StartDagServerMaintenance.ps1
    only runs Suspend-MailboxDatabaseCopy -ActivationOnly? In other words, why does the script only suspend copy activation and not the copy process? 
    "Did the two Hub Transport servers locate in the same AD site?", yes they are in the same
    AD site but different physical locations. The article on HSS helped explain HT HA. 
    Thanks again! 

  • Outlook Profile Not Updated to New CAS Array After Mailbox Move Between Sites

    I am working on a large mailbox migration from one AD site to another. 
    Exchange version at both sites:Exchange 2010 SP2
    Two Mailbox Servers: MBX01 in site A / MBX02 in site B
    (There is a DAG but keeping this simple)
    Two CAS Arrays: CASA.domain.com / CASB.domain.com
    The RPCClientAccessServer property is set accordingly.  Where MBX01 is set to CASA.domain.com and MBX02 is set to CASB.domain.com
    Clients:Outlook 2010 SP1
    Scenario: I successfully move a mailbox from Site A to Site B.  The Outlook client does not automatically update its server settings to point to the new cas array (CASB.domain.com) and continues to connect to the old CAS server (CASA.domain.com).
    I have seen a few articles regarding this pointing to workarounds such as:
    - repairing the outlook profile on the client
    - delete the existing outlook profile
    - run a script to update the prf file (re-cache's email at the client)
    I am interested in knowing if anyone else has experienced this, what their solution was for a large migration and if any roll-ups or service packs have possibly fixed this problem.
    I would also like to know if you have seen this affect ActiveSync devices.  I am getting mixed results in my tests and thought it may be contributed toward different device types, mobile os versions, etc...
    I have posted this to the Outlook forum as well, just wasn't sure where to start.
    Thanks.
    Mike

    Hi,
    Firstly, I’d like to say, in Exchange 2010 and prior to SP2 CU3 version,
    when we move mailboxes between AD sites, users will not receive any notice about restarting Outlook and their RPC endpoint won’t update to reflect the RPC Client Access Server array associated with the mailbox database in the AD site where the mailbox now resides.
    Depending on repairing or recreating profile, we can force Outlook to use the new RPC endpoint.
    If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
    Thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • Outlook lost connection when load balanced CAS array name was moved to different AD site and data centre

    At the weekend our F5 load balanced CAS array name was moved to our 3rd datacentre and all users lost access to Outlook.  The databases were running on DAG2 listed below at the time.
    We have 3 DAG servers configured as the following:
    DAG SERVER ONE (DAG1) | Datacentre 1 | Primary AD Site | Multi role server MBX, CAS, HT
    DAG SERVER TWO (DAG2)  | Datacentre 2 | Primary AD Site | Multi role server MBX, CAS, HT
    DAG SERVER THREE (DAG3) | Datacentre 3 | Secondary AD Site | Multi role server MBX, CAS, HT
    We primarlily run from DAG1 or DAG2 - DAG3 is for real DR and loss of Datacentre 1 and 2.  The CAS array "Outlook" is configured for the primary AD site load balanced across DAG1 and DAG2.
    We use an F5 load balancer that balances the connections across DAG1 and DAG2, if both fail then DAG3 is used automatically.   We have tested and it works fine simulating loosing DAG1 and DAG2 and bringing up as a 1 node cluster on DAG3 with a
    FSW and the load balancer pointing at DAG3 for Outlook connections.
    For some reason this stopped Outlook users connecting - can anyone advise me why as I have been asked to test this again and I was expecting it to work?

    Hi,
    As far as I know, For Exchange 2010 before SP2 RU3,the Outlook clients with an existing Outlook profile would continue to use the old RPC endpoint rather than the new RPC endpoint (even though Autodiscover detected the change). Thus, except with Andy's suggestion,
    I recommend you can also repair or recreate the Outlook profile to have a test.
    For more information, you can refer to the following article:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/aljackie/archive/2013/11/14/outlook-rpc-end-point-and-pf-the-microsoft-exchange-administrator-has-made-a-change-that-requires-you-quit-and-restart-outlook.aspx
    Thanks,
    Angela Shi
    TechNet Community Support

  • CAS Array created but Outlook 2007 still points to first CAS Server

    Hi All,
    I just created a DAG between two servers and CAS Array between two other servers.
    DAG:-       EX01 -Mailbox, CAS,HT (First Exchange Server)
                    EX02-Mailbox
    CAS Array:     CA-HT01 (CAS & HT Role)
                          CA-HT02 (CAS & HT Role)
    I created CAS Array and assigned an FQDN for that array but It does not get changed in outlook 2007 it still uses old server EX01.So when I am shutting down server ex01 for testing all outlook 2007 client
    get disconnected.
    Does this required to change profile for all outlook 2007 users? I am more than 1600 users I am not sure how many users using outlook 2007.
    Please guide.I already configure Autodiscover service as it is suggested somewhere online but no luck.
    Thanks

    Mike,
    I tried with shutdown original RPCCLientAccessServer for two days but still that old value did not
    chnaged to new one.Can you guide me what is the exact method of creating Autodiscover so that outlook 2007 will point to new RPCCLientAccessServe value when
    existing is down/not accessible.
    Thanks
    If the  RPCCLientClientAccess Server referenced in the Outlook profile is not accessible, then Outlook should have found the new one at some point or failed to connect to Exchange entirely. Are you saying the Outlook clients continue to connect to Exchange
    even though the server defined in Outlook was not accessible? 
    If you close and re-open Outlook does it show the new RPCCLientAccessServer value in the profile?
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

  • DAG Member Reboot & Outlook Connectivity

    Hello. I Have two Exchange 2013 CU3 Standard servers in a DAG. 
    The servers are running Server 2012 Standard.
    We’ve had a few users report that they sometimes encounter an error when trying to attach an Outlook item (e-mail message) to an existing item in a public folder calendar.
     The users can attach the item, but when they click on Save, a message stating that “Changes made to the item were lost due to a reconnect with the server.” appears.
      The clients are all running Outlook 2010 SP2.
    I have determined that in at least one case, and probably a few more, this happened during or shortly after, I was rebooting our passive DAG member as part of the process of installing Microsoft updates on it. 
    I use round robin DNS to achieve the load balancing needed to provide high availability. 
    A check on the connectivity status of an Outlook client shows the name of the DNS record associated with this as the proxy server. 
     The name is essentially “serverLB”.  Since I have DNS records for serverLB that point to the IP address of each DAG members, is it possible that some clients are connecting to the passive node, and, therefore, affected
    by it being rebooted?    I’d like to understand how rebooting the passive server causes the problem encountered by the Outlook users. 
    If you have any insights into that, please share them with me. 
    Thanks.

    Hi. Thank you for the response.
    I have two nodes in the DAG.
     The passive server is completely passive - it has no mounted databases.
    Please clarify your comment about checking "server health” on the active node when the passive node is rebooting. 
    What exactly do I look for, and what is the best method of doing this? 
    As far as checking replication health when the passive node is rebooting, I would expect Test-ReplicationHealth to indicate that replication is failing because one of the servers is rebooting and, therefore, unavailable. 
    With regards to database copy status, I would also expect that get-mailboxdatabasecopystatus * would report failures since the passive node is unavailable due to the reboot.
    Accessing the user mailbox through OWA rather than Outlook is a good idea. I'll try that during our next scheduled reboot. That, however, may not happen for about a week.
    I don’t have the money for a hardware load balancing solution, and network load balancing is incompatible with a DAG. 
    Consequently, round robin DNS is the only option for me.
    Please clarify your comment about adding HOST file entries. 
    Do you mean that if I add two entries for serverLB and the IP address of each server to the HOST file on each client, I could avoid the issue I have asked about?

  • Same CAS Array Exchange 2010 (HLB), with OS Windows 2008R2 and Windows 2012.

    Hello,
    We have a 10 node DAG (Exchange 2010 SP3, Windows 2008 R2), with 2 CasArray.
    We are planning to add news (multirole) servers and create a new DAG (Exchange 2010 SP3, Windows 2012) in this infra, in the same AD site, to migrate all mailbox from the other DAG (Migration from virtual servers to physical servers).
    So we use the same CasArray (HLB, with F5) with différent OS version, during the migration time (1 month or more). I haven't found anything that say it's not supported or can be problematic.
    Have you feedback or advice?
    Thanks,
    Sébastien

    Hi,
    Based on my knowledge, there is no need to deploy a CAS array with CAS servers running on the same Window version. The version can be different.
    After a Client Access server array is defined within an Active Directory site, all Client Access servers within that Active Directory site are automatically part of the Client Access server array.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • CAS array internal DNS IP address best practice

    Hi, Just a question about a best practice approach for DNS and CAS arrays.
    I have an Exchange 2010 Org. I have two CAS/HUB servers and two MBX servers. My external DNS (mail.mycompany.biz) host record points to a public IP address which is NAT'd to the internal IP address of my NLB CAS cluster. I maintain a split brain
    DNS. Should the internal DNS entry for mail.mycompany.biz also point to the public IP address or should it point to the internal IP address of the NLB cluster?

    A few comments:
    The reason you have split DNS is to do exactly these sort of things: inside users hit the inside IP and outside users hit the outside IP.  You'll have to look at your overall network design to see if it makes sense for users to take this shortest route
    to the services, or if there is value in knowing all users simply take the same path.
    You should not be using the same DNS name for your web services (e.g. OWA) as you are for your CAS array.  This can cause very long connection delays on Outlook clients, not to mention overall confusion in your design.  Many orgs will use something
    like "outlook.domain.com" for the Client Access Array and "mail.domain.com" for the web services.  Only the later of these two need to be exposed to the internet.
    Keep in mind, Exchange 2013 dramatically changes this guidance.  There is no more CAS array, and the
    recommended design is to use dedicated namespaces for each web service.
    Mike Crowley | MVP
    My Blog --
    Planet Technologies

  • Outlook not switched over to active DAG member after failover

    I have a 2 server DAG stretched across sites for DR.  Both of these servers are multi-role and have the HT, CAS, and MBOX roles.  Everything with the DAG seems to be working fine, as does what turned out to be an accidental failover to the remote
    site.  A fail back also went fairly smoothly.
    However, I've now discovered that some Outlook clients switched over to the DR server automatically and now they will not switch back.  I will come out right away and say that I do not have a CAS array.  I just learned about the CAS array while
    researching the problem.  After refreshing my own mailbox profile, everything swapped back, but obviously I don't want to go around everywhere making that change.  I don't even know how many people are still connecting to the DR server.  In
    fact, the only problem with the people that are connecting to the DR server is a little extra latency.
    Obviously, I would like this to work better, and would like a good way to get the outlook users swapped back to where they should be right now.

    There is a public folder and it is on the same server as the mailboxes.
    2014-05-05T19:58:17.555Z,239,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00.0312510,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T19:58:17.571Z,239,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T19:58:17.602Z,239,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0781275,,
    2014-05-05T20:22:59.321Z,217,222,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogoff,0,00:00:00,LogonId: 0,
    2014-05-05T20:22:59.337Z,217,222,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogoff,0,00:00:00.0156255,LogonId: 1,
    2014-05-05T20:22:59.368Z,217,222,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogoff,0,00:00:00.0468765,LogonId: 2,
    2014-05-05T20:22:59.400Z,217,222,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,07:43:06.1863315,,
    2014-05-05T20:28:35.067Z,240,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00.0156255,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:28:35.098Z,240,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:28:35.113Z,240,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0625020,,
    2014-05-05T20:28:35.348Z,241,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:28:35.379Z,241,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00.0156255,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:28:35.395Z,241,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:28:42.411Z,242,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:28:42.442Z,242,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00.0156255,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:28:42.457Z,242,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:28:57.708Z,243,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:28:58.005Z,244,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:28:58.020Z,244,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:28:58.052Z,244,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:28:58.677Z,243,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogon,0,00:00:00.9531555,"Logon: Delegate, /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=other user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; LogonId: 0",
    2014-05-05T20:29:05.286Z,243,7,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogon,0,00:00:01.0469085,"Logon: Delegate, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=cjoynt in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; LogonId: 1",
    2014-05-05T20:29:06.552Z,243,27,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogon,0,00:00:00.6718965,"Logon: Delegate, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=cjoynt in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; LogonId: 2",
    2014-05-05T20:33:09.013Z,243,36,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogoff,0,00:00:00,LogonId: 0,
    2014-05-05T20:33:09.028Z,243,36,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogoff,0,00:00:00.0156255,LogonId: 1,
    2014-05-05T20:33:09.060Z,243,36,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogoff,0,00:00:00.0468765,LogonId: 2,
    2014-05-05T20:33:09.091Z,243,36,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:04:11.3830440,,
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.435Z,245,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.482Z,245,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.497Z,245,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0625020,,
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.763Z,246,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.779Z,246,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.810Z,246,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.810Z,247,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.841Z,247,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:33:15.857Z,247,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:34:26.375Z,248,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00.0156255,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:34:26.390Z,248,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:34:26.422Z,248,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0625020,,
    2014-05-05T20:34:26.937Z,249,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:34:26.953Z,249,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:34:26.984Z,249,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:34:27.234Z,250,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:34:27.250Z,250,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:34:27.281Z,250,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0468765,,
    2014-05-05T20:34:28.234Z,251,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00.0156255,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:34:29.219Z,251,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogon,0,00:00:00.9687810,"Logon: Delegate, /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=other user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; LogonId: 0",
    2014-05-05T20:34:30.250Z,251,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,OUTLOOK.EXE,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,DelegateLogon,0,00:00:01.0312830,"Logon: Delegate, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=cjoynt in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; LogonId: 1",
    2014-05-05T20:36:00.971Z,252,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:36:00.987Z,252,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:36:01.003Z,252,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0312510,,
    2014-05-05T20:36:07.909Z,253,0,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,10.1.1.32,fe80::45df:6c5e:aec6:fad1%14,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Connect,0,00:00:00.0156255,"SID=S-1-5-21-2073836326-1490033320-1384523041-3159, Flags=None",
    2014-05-05T20:36:07.925Z,253,1,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,OwnerLogon,1144 (rop::WrongServer),00:00:00,"Logon: Owner, /O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user in database Mailbox Database 2063624589 last mounted on Server1.Company.com at 5/2/2014 4:36:10 AM, currently Mounted; Redirected: this server is not in a preferred site for the database, suggested new server: /o=Company/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Configuration/cn=Servers/cn=Server1",RopHandler: Logon:
    2014-05-05T20:36:07.940Z,253,2,/O=Company/OU=domain/cn=Recipients/cn=user,,SearchProtocolHost.exe,12.0.6672.5000,Cached,,,ncacn_ip_tcp,,Disconnect,0,00:00:00.0312510,,

  • Exchange 2013, do I need cas array configuration?

    Hello,
    I have a setup of 2 mailbox servers and 2 cas servers (cas1.demo.local, cas2.demo.local).
    Created dns-round-robin for the two cas servers.
    Created host A record for cas.demo.local
    Setup internal url's  to point cas.demo.local
    I'm planing to test loadbalancer for the cas-services.
    Do I need to setup CAS-Array?
    Im getting error from the "New-ClientAccessArray" cmdlet
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>New-ClientAccessArray
    New-ClientAccessArray : The term 'New-ClientAccessArray' is not recognized as the name of a cmdlet, function, script fi
    le, or operable program. Check the spelling of the name, or if a path was included, verify that the path is correct and
     try again.
    At line:1 char:1
    + New-ClientAccessArray
    + ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        + CategoryInfo          : ObjectNotFound: (New-ClientAccessArray:String) [], CommandNotFoundException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : CommandNotFoundException
    Yours,
    Jouni

    As I understood it, the individual servers still use their individual names ... you still need to configure exchange to use only one name ... the difference is that it is a lot simpler now. with exchange 2010 you had to use
    new-clientaccessarray -name -fqdn -siteand afterwards you had to configure the mailboxdatabases to use the array with
    set-mailboxdatabase database -rpclientaccessserver name of the array
    then with the advent of exchange 2013 u just use
    get-outlookanywhere |set-outlookanywherer -internalname -externalname
    it is the -internalname with set-outlookanywhere that is new. In exchange 2010 you only could configure the externalname with set-outlook-anywhere and therefore you had to use new-clienteaccessarray and set-mailboxdatabase
    Mikael Ljung

  • CAS ARRAY fail-over and emails stuck

    Dear all,
    for some reasons we are in Exchange Server Coexistance mode that is 1 Exchange 2003 Server and 2. Exchange 2010 servers.
    We have CAS array(node-1 And Node-2) and DAG in place , but the problem is whenever my Node-1 is down emails are getting stuck routing group connector on legacy server and Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2010 emails are working.
    oppositly
    when my Node-2 is down everything works.
    how do I FIX this ?
    TheAtulA

    Dear all,
    for some reasons we are in Exchange Server Coexistance mode that is 1 Exchange 2003 Server and 2. Exchange 2010 servers.
    We have CAS array(node-1 And Node-2) and DAG in place , but the problem is whenever my Node-1 is down emails are getting stuck routing group connector on legacy server and Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2010 emails are working.
    oppositly
    when my Node-2 is down everything works.
    how do I FIX this ?
    TheAtulA
    I assume the CAS also have the hub trasnport installed?
    Check the Routing Group Connector(s) (Get-RoutingGroupConnector) and ensure the source and destination transports include both CAS nodes, not just Node-1.
    If not, then use set-routinggroupconnector to set the correct source and target servers 
    https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa998581(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Twitter!: Please Note: My Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Import PST files for multiple users at the same time?

    While importing PST files into archive mailboxes, the Exchange 2010 mailbox server went to 100% CPU and memory usage and I could not stop the imports because the EMS stopped responding.  We had to restart the whole server to get back to normal. Not s

  • Highlight Fields as default for PDF Forms

    Hello all,      I've recently designed a PDF form with some required fields, which get marked in red as soon as you open the form. However, some Acrobat Reader users have to click first on "highlight fields" in order to see the required fields. Is th

  • Apps appear on iphone screen but when clicked, appear then disappear...???

    I 'successfully' dl apps (I get the iTunes bill) and sync and turn on/off my iPhone but my newly installed apps won't work. The ATT people don't know why...anyone???

  • Any interest in daily built e17 cvs snapshots?

    Hi i have created a system for myself in which i build, mostly daily, a bleeding edge version of e17. I do not wish to compete with the rensel repository, I only want to find out if there is any interest, as i build them anyway for private use. If th

  • BI Roles administration: What is Best Practice?

    I am interested in what is considered best practice for administering roles in BI. Is this something always left to BASIS at most SAP sites? or does the BI team (development/support) usually do this? I am responsible for supporting the BI users and k