Two eigrp clientes with same AS number

Hi,
I have one vrf with Protocol PE-CE Eigrp and AS number 100,
but another new client with protocol PE-CE eigrp wish same AS number.
This is a problem?
Regards
Rodrigo Prieto

As long as they are on separate VRF tables there is no issue.

Similar Messages

Two idocs with same idoc number in idx5

We are using an idoc to file scenario where idocs are bundled using bpm and posted to ftp. here the issue is we are getting two idocs with same idoc number in idx5. due to which the file in ftp is getting overwritten.
Could anyone suggest me what to do in this regard.

Hi,
>>>check your sender system is sending same IDoc twice ?
if you send the same IDOC twice they both get different numbers as IDOC number is taken from the IDOC num range
unless you're able to send the same IDOC twice with the same IDOC num somehow
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Vendor Invoice with Same Reference Number in two fiscal years.

Vendor Invoice entered in SAP.
DocumentNum 1600000612 Reference "47026723WA" Vendor Number "637278" Year "2008"
DocumentNum 1600000667 Reference "47026723WA" Vendor Number "637278" Year "2009"
We are thinking SAP will not allow/generate invoice with same Reference number. How can we restrict from entering Vendor invoices with Same Reference Number from same Vendor.
Thanks
Raghuram

Restrict it through message control
Transaction code OBA5
Message NO.121
Make it error for batch and online.
Thanks,
Ravi

Two instance with same port number in one machine.

How can I config one machine(one IP) to listen to two different URLs with same port? (http://www.abc.com & http://www.xyz.com)??

What you are looking for is a feature called virtual servers. Lots of information in Chapter 13 of the admin guide.
The key is that there is only one server instance. (One available port pretty much implies one server instance.) But the virtual server feature allows you to specifiy different "virtual" servers based on the URL characteristics. (such as domain name)

CS4 & CS5 Indy with same serial number

Can CS4 & CS5 Indy with same serial number both be open on the same machine?
Thanks!

I'm wondering how you have two versions with the same serial number? Volume license maybe?
In the world of single licenses an upgrade from CS4 to CS5 would get a new new number, at least in my experience. As far as installing multiple versions (but not differnt localizations, like US and ME, of the same version) no problem, and I often have multiple versions open at the same time for testing and answereing questions here on the forum.

Two soa domain with same name "TestSOADomain" sharing same SOA schema ?

I tried creating two soa domain with same name "TestSOADomain" (different path) sharing same SOA schema .However one domain came UP to Running mode and other domain going to AdminMode and "soa-infra" application of that domain is not active.
I do want to understand can this be possible with SOA ,ie. two soa domain sharing same SOA schema ?
If possible what are all the problems might come
1. While executing soa composites with asyncronous behaviour ?
2. How the polling services will work ?
3. will the XREF_DATA table ROW_NUMBER column inserted uniquely while inserting data from two different domain into same SOA schema ?
4. Other issues ?
Thanks

Each domain is expected to refer to its own unique database schema. Same SOA schema should not be shared by multiple SOA clusters/domains. It is technically possible though, I suppose, and still can run fine any one SOA environment at any given time with the other SOA environments/domains (sharing the same SOA schema) shutdown. It is not the general/recommended practice to share SOA schema across domains and there could be potential implications and unexpected behavior, particularly when the SOA environments pointing to the same schema are all running at a time.

Reflection - Two packages/classes with same name

Hi There !
I am in a situation and I need some help, if anyone can help me.
I have two tools to work with different version of a server application. Now, the admin wants to have only one tool to work with both server app.
The problem is that the server app has a jar file with the API to be used to access it. One jar for each version.
Inside those jars files I have the same package and the same class ! But the implementation is diferent. So I will need to access one jar when accessing the old server app and another jar to access the new server app.
I have no idea how to do it.
I search arround google and I found that I can load a class at runtime and then with Reflection call its methods.
I made a test app (simple, just 2 different jars with same package and class name just printing a Hello World and Bye World) and it worked very well.
But when I tried to apply this to my code, I realize that one class need the reference of the other class...
For example, I have a class named Server and other called ServerStatus.
The Server class do the connection to the server and the ServerStatus get some server information. But the method that give me this information has a argument asking for an object of Server... like this:
Server serv = new Server();
serv.connect();
ServerStatus servStat = new ServerStatus();
servStat.getServerStatus(serv);I tried to do this with reflection but in the part that I need to invoke the method getServerStatus, I do not have the name of the class that is the argument (in this case Server).
Something like this:
Method m = serverClass.getMethod("getServerStatus", new Class[] {?????.class});
result = (Boolean)m.invoke(server, new Object[] {serverStatus});Do you have any ideiias to resolve this ?
Or something different from reflection to access two different implementations with same package and class name ?
If you need any other information, please ask me..
Thank you so much !
Regards,
Thiago

Thiago wrote:
Hi.
But now, how can I handle the object (because the newInstance() return a Object object.... not the class that I want (Server, for example)).
When you declare a reference to be something more narrow than "Object" you're telling the compiler what methods and fields the referenced object supports. With a dynamically loaded class you can't do that at compile time, because the nature of the class isn't known until you load it at runtime.
That's why it's very handy if you know that the class you are to load implements some interface which is known at compile time. Then you can access the object through a reference to that interface.
Otherwise there's really no option but to handle the object through reflection. Find methods with getMethod() on the Class object and invoke them with Method.invoke().
There are tricks to impose an interface onto a dynamically loaded class at runtime, but they are just neat ways of working through reflection.

Get the Common from Two Internal Tables with same structure

Hi ,
I need to get the Common data from Two Internal Tables with same structure with using the looping method.
For e.g.
I have two internal table say ITAB1 and ITAB2.
ITAB1 has values A,B,C,D,E,F
ITAB2 has values A,H,B,Y,O
Output at runtime should be : A,B

Hi mohit,
1. If u want to compare all fields,
   for matching purpose,
   then we can do like this.
2.
report abc.
data : a like t001 occurs 0 with header line.
data : b like t001 occurs 0 with header line.
loop at a.
LOOP AT B.
    IF A = B.
      WRITE :/ 'SAME'.
    ENDIF.
endloop.
ENDLOOP.
regards,
amit m.

Unbale to create new document part with same document number

Number range assigned to the X Document Type is internal. I have created new document (0001) with Document Part 000 & Version 00. For same Document Number when i tried to create New Document part by mentioning Document Numner 0001, Document Part 001 and Version 00, it says Document Type X can be assigned to internal number range only.
Even I tried with following selection....
Document Number = Blank
Document Part = 001
Document Version = 00
Template:
Document = 0001
Document Part = 000
Document Version = 00
Now system is creating document with new number i.e. 0002. But we want to create another document part with same Document Number. What is the problem with internal number range for Document Number?

Hi Pradeep,
Following are the config parameter of the document type.
CM Relevnce = blank
Number assignmt= 01
Internal Number Range =02
External Number Range= blank
Number Exit =MCDOKZNR
Vers. No. Incr. =0
Version Sequence = blank
AlternativeScreen = blank
Let me know if you need anything more.
Edited by: JJSingh76 on Dec 7, 2010 7:25 PM

Reprinting check with same check number

How to reprint the check with same check number. In transaction FCH7, I am able to reprint the check but it gives another check number. Is there another transaction code to reprint the same check with the same check number
thankyou

Hello Sheena,
please disregard the last answer, that works for SAP Business One...
For your situation:
If you reprint checks with transaction FCH7, you need to void the
previous check (with a void reason) and afterwards the system would
assign a new check number.
However, if you do it through transaction FBZ5 (print form for Payment
Document), the system will ask you, if you would like to print an
existing check number or would like to get a new check number assigned
(Check -> print->"Check information already exists.
Reprint old check number or assign new check number?" => print with old
check number).
As per you comments, I assume that the second option (via transaction
FBZ5), is the way you should use to reprint checks without getting
a new check number assigned.
Sorry for the confusion...
Cheers,
Jon

I got both a PC version and a mac version in my purchase but once i loaded to my PC it will not allow me to load to my Mac with same redemption number. Is there a way to do that?

i got both a PC version and a mac version in my purchase but once i loaded to my PC it will not allow me to load to my Mac with same redemption number. Is there a way to do that?

I was going to ask a similar question - we bought the boxed version of PSE11 with mac and pc disc - can we install the program on our mac as well as our PC? It's already on the PC but would be very handy to have it on Mac also. Thanks

Is it possible to install two SAP system with same SID but different instance numbers on one host?

Is it possible to install two SAP system with same system ID (SID) but different instance numbers on one host?
If yes, then how?
If no, then why?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sarim

Is it possible to install two SAP system with same system ID (SID) but different instance numbers on one host?
Yes, it is possible. If one is CI (PAS) and the second one is an AS (AAS). In this case there will be only one database.
If you are talking about two separate SAP systems with separate databases (Eg: A BI and an ECC) with the same SID then the problem will be with the database (Eg: Oracle)
The database will be installed under /oracle/SID/112_64 (ORACLE_HOME) unless one database is running on 10 G and in that case the ORACLE_HOME will be /oracle/SID/102_64
The next issue will be with the SAP file systems like /sapmnt/SID
The most important problem will be with the switch to the sidadm and orasid users and the conflicts there. If there is a need to stop one of the SAP systems and if you do a switch to sidadm and issue a stopsap command which system will be stopped ?
These are few of the many problems I can think of.
So if we are talking about two separate systems with their own databases I would rule out the possibility of having two systems with the same SID.
Regards
RB

MIRO: two invoices were posted with same Reference Number?

Hi all!
Using the MIRO user posted two invoices with the same Reference number without any warning.
Is it normal?
Invoices looks exactly identical, the only difference is "Specl G/L assgt" which one of them has and another doesn't.
Regards.

Hi Harish,
I checked:
1) "Duplicate invoice number" : SPRO/Materials Management/Logistics Invoice Verification/Incoming Invoice/Set Check for Duplicate Invoices - set up for Company Code correctly
2) "Duplicate invoice number" setup for Vendor (FK03) (tick is set up)
3) OBMSG M8 108 set up as IE (not 100% sure it's exactly the same message I'm looking for)
Seems everything is fine.
But I posted 2 invoices in MIRO with the same reference - no warning or error.
Any advices?

Two IPAD 2s with same IMEI # - horrible customer support to resolve issue

A week ago my boyfriend discovered that Verizon had disconnected service to the iPAD 2 I gave him from his account 7 months ago but continued to charge him $11.21 per month for the phone line on a non-existent device. To date I have spoken with more Verizon employees I can count on two hands, been passed back and forth between customer care and the fraud prevention department repeatedly, had to recount this entire story each and every time as well as provide passwords, last 4 digits SS, IPAD IMEI number, phone numbers for the account, named and address for the account, original purchase receipt for the iPAD, and yet, a week later nothing has been resolved, service has not been restored, calls have not been returned as promised, and charges for a so-called "test phone" (that non-existent device) continue to accrue. I have no promised resolution date and there doesn't seem to be any urgency on Verizon's part to either apologize or fix the problem for us.
A year ago my boyfriend purchased a Verizon iPhone and added the IPAD 2 to is data share plan as a second device for $10/month. Apparently last July another Verizon customer walked into a store with an iPAD claiming they were having connectivity issues. Supposedly it was determined that the IMEI number on that individual's device matched the IMEI number for the iPAD 2 on my boyfriend's account. Without bothering to research the issue or contact my boyfriend, Verizon simply removed my boyfriend's iPAD 2 service, converted his data share plan second device to something simply identified in his account as a "Test Phone", and assigned his IMEI number to this other customer's account. My boyfriend isn't the most tech savvy person, so when his iPAD 2 quit accessing the internet he assumed it was something wrong with the iPAD, or a function of where he was at - he spends 5 months of the year in Alaska and coverage is often spotty at best. So he just tossed it aside opting to browse with his iPhone instead. Then last week he just happened to be reviewing his latest Verizon bill and where he expected to see the $10/month charge for the iPAD he saw an $11.21 charge to a phone number he didn't recognize. So he elected to go into a Verizon store to learn what that was about.
There at the Verizon Store the customer service rep informed him that he was "in possession of a stolen iPAD" . This brain trust of an employee went on to explain to my 65 year old boyfriend that since two devices could not possibly have the same IMEI number, and since the IMEI number on his device (which he took with him to the store) matched the IMEI number of the iPAD on another customer's account, the only logical conclusion was that he had somehow acquired this "stolen iPAD" illegally. At that point I was contacted to talk to this Verizon employee since I was the original purchaser of that iPAD. No matter that the customer that now had the iPAD IMEI number on their account acquired that IMEI number after my boyfriend originally registered his iPAD with Verizon. All of a sudden we are the bad guys that stole an iPAD. We were informed that we would have to produce an original receipt before they could discuss this with us further. In other words, guilty of steeling an iPAD until we can prove innocense. I guess the idea that we would register an iPAD, then sell it to another Verizon customer a couple months later, but continue to pay to have the device on our account, then steal the device back from this other customer, and then bring this stolen device into a Verizon store in an attempt to fraudulently register it back onto our account, just seemed like a more likely scenario to this employee. More likely than the one where another Verizon employee maybe fat-fingured the other guy's IMEI number into their system resulting in the system identifying a duplicate IMEI to the one we had already registered, thereby causing this other, highly trained and intelligent, Verizon rep to simply remove the IMEI number from our account and assign it to this other, obviously more honest appearing individual, without bothering to inform my other half his iPAD was no longer going to be registered, and that he would continue to be billed monthly for the service he no longer had. Yeah, right.
I could only think of one other possible scenario, that two iPADs could have the same identical IMEI number. After spending hours on hold,recounting this story to numerous Verizon customer service and fraud reps to no avail, and becoming exceedingly frustrated with the fact that you can never get a direct line to a specific rep you've already worked with and can never speak to the same rep more than once, I decided to contact Apple about the likelihood of this possibility. In spite of having an iPAD that was no longer on any sort of technical service warranty, Apple tech rep answered the phone with less than a 2 minute wait. Listened intently to my story, and expressed complete and utter shock at how I had been treated by Verizon thus far. He stated emphatically that two devices will not have the same, unique IMEI number. Further, he was able to verify that the iPAD I purchased and registered with Apple matched the IMEI number we registered with Verizon in February 2013 and the same IMEI number of the device my boyfriend presented in the store a week ago and that according to their records, the device has always been registered to me and only me. He then called Verizon on my behalf and spoke to the Verizon Customer Care rep - of course, another different one, and vouched for me as the original and only known owner to Apple of that iPAD. He then connected me with that Verizon rep. Ten minutes later with the Apple tech rep off the call, the Verizon CC rep actually told me the Apple tech did not vouch for me during his conversation with her. She did admit he called her, but did not seem to understand why he called her. Wow.
So, next I proceeded to secure a duplicate sales receipt from Best Buy for the purchase I made the day the iPAD 2 first hit the shelf on March 2, 2011. No problems with Best Buy customer service. Back home with an electronic copy of the receipt I called Verizon for what seemed now like the 100th time in 3 days and waited on hold the obligatory 20 minutes, made my way through the automated answering system obstacle course, provided all the various security pass codes, account numbers and answered all the requisite questions which, by now, I am convinced are designed to get the less determined customer to simply give up in exasperation. Only to be told by this new customer care rep that I could not send this receipt electronically to them because "that would be illegal". OMG
I was told I would need to wait until so and so from the fraud department returned his promised call to me - by then two days overdue. Sorry. So, I waited another day and called the fraud department. Got a new person after all the **. Only to have this person give me an e-mail address to send the receipt and then they needed to go as they were so busy and I could call back later. Called back again to see if now that they had the receipt they could tell me what the status was for closing out the investigation and re-activating our iPAD. Got another new person. Of course they can never connect you with anyone you've worked with before. Either they've never heard of all those other people you've talked to or that other person is simply not there. This time it was the latter and I would have to continue to wait two more days when that other person handling the case was supposed to return. Supposedly this other person entered into their notes that they tried to call me. Funny, they had the right contact information for me and I had my cell phone with me the entire time as I was expecting that call. Yet, it never rang, there were no logged missed calls, and no messages on it. So, at this point I am totally out of my mind and I'm sure there are lots of notes in the case file about the irate and unreasonable woman customer that keeps calling about this issue. I ask to speak to a supervisor. I'm told I can't because the her supervisor has already left for the day due to all the long hours they've all been working. I asked to speak to another supervisor. I was told, you can't speak to another supervisor, "you can only speak to my supervisor as I'm not allowed to connect you with anyone but my supervisor. I'm sorry, you'll have to wait.".
So, here it is, now 2 days since that last incredible conversation. Still no one from Verizon has bothered to contact me. I can fully understand that people make mistakes. I can understand that something like this might take time to investigate. I get it. But, what I can't accept is this attitude that the customer is wrong and Verizon never makes mistakes. I can't accept being accused of stealing as the only plausible answer for what has happened. I can't accept that Verizon's Customer Care reps and Fraud Prevention reps make promises to call you back on a specific day and then they never do. I can't understand why they wouldn't at least touch base to let you know they haven't forgotten you. I can't understand why you have to explain the situation over and over again to a different individual every single time you call them. Each and every rep seems to have gone through a very thorough training program where the very first words out of their mouths is "I'm sorry you are having this problem. But, rest assured I am here to fix this for you." After having heard that at least a couple dozen times now, I know how shallow and meaningless those words really are coming from Verizon.
Verizon, shame on you. You've treated us like dirt. You've fraudulently charged us $80 to date and continue to charge us for a non-existent phone on a non-existent service. You don't return calls as promised and I have had to resort to this discussion in hopes of getting resolution. Anyone else feel like they've been treated this badly? I've been a loyal customer for many years.

MatthewS_VZW,
As indicated in the original post, I did contact fraud. Today I contacted them again to get a status. I was informed they closed the case as "not fraud" on the 22nd, but could explain why I was not contacted back regarding this latest status. However, the rep then proceeded to tell me they thought I should send a new photocopy of the receipt because the one I sent in was cutoff. In looking at what I submitted, it was indeed, slightly cutoff at the very bottom. But what was cutoff was entirely irrelevant as the total cost, applied gift cards and final charge to my credit card were all clearly visible in the middle of the receipt. The only thing cutoff was the last line of details on the 4th gift card applied to the payment and the line was only cut in half and still decipherable. Just another stall tactic. Finally the rep agreed that sending a new receipt wasn't really necessary since the case was already closed. She said all we needed to do now was go into a Verizon store with the iPad and they could reactivate it. However, being now very doubtful of anything Verizon has to say, I called Customer Care and that rep said that while the fraud case was indeed closed, nothing has yet been resolved because the other party still has an active device with the same IMEI number. They could not activate our iPad until the mystery of the duplicate number is resolved.
The customer care rep offered to call the other party and see if they would be willing to bring in their device and sales receipt as well. So, he promised to call me back after he tried the other party. Well, Raul at Verizon wins the prize for best customer care so far since he really did call me back! But, apparently the other party told him to pound sand and hung up on him. Raul was uncomfortable with simply deactivating the other customer's device - wish the Verizon rep that deactivated our device last July had been as ethical as Raul. So, we are still in limbo with a device we can't get activated. Raul did at least agree we should be reimbursed for the last 7 months of charges for a non-existent device and supposedly has submitted a request on our behalf to credit us with $80. He also promised to call back tomorrow with an updated status. But, at this point it appears there is no clear path to resolve yet. I don't know what we're going to do or who to elevate this to next. If they can't compel the other party to prove ownership, or if the other party can prove ownership and indeed there are two devices with the same IMEI number, it seems the only solution will be for Verizon to issue a new device to one of the parties so we both can use iPads.

Lightroom reinstallation on different mac with same serial number.

im using lightroom on my mac air.
and im planning to buy a mac pro soon.
in that case, is it possible to use lightroom on my new mac pro with the same serial numbers that im using now on mac air?
(im not going to use lightroom on mac air)

Adobe allows two installations of Lightroom on different computers with the proviso that only one can be used at any one time. (There is no on-line activation/de-activation process, only your honesty.)
Just install on the new mac pro with the same serial number.
Note: If the Mac Air has an "update" version installed (for example -you upgraded from LR3 to LR5) then you will need both Serial Numbers for LR3 & the LR5-update, to install on the new Mac pro.

Two eigrp clientes with same AS number

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for