Two-envelope

Hi guys
I would like to know if SRM7.0  standard has this option, or i have to activate Procurement for Public Sector Functions (SRM_PPS). If i activate this option, i will have troubles with no  Public sector companies? After activate this function the system will show some special field mandatory only for public sector companies ?
Can i use this function to other kind of business or only for Public Sector companies?
Forgive me my bad english.
Best regards.
Edited by: Ataide on Mar 8, 2012 2:33 AM

Hi,
I would like to know if SRM7.0 standard has this option, or i have to activate Procurement for Public Sector Functions (SRM_PPS)
->You have to activate PPS Function.
If i activate this option, i will have troubles with no Public sector companies?
->No you will not have any problem with SRM basic functionality. PPS will just offer you additional functionalities.
Can i use this function to other kind of business or only for Public Sector companies?
->It depends upon requirement. You can use the way you like. But as name states these are special features provided in SRM.
Regards,
yaniVy
reward if helps

Similar Messages

  • SRM 7.0 for two envelope bidding

    Dear SRM gurus,
    Am new to SRM. My client is implementing SRM 7.0 for limited tenders in which two-envelope bidding is involved.
    PR, PO and all other flollow-on documents will be created in ECC 6.0.
    I have activated business function SRM_Sourcing_1 and activated other RFx related config.
    Kindly let me know all other config's that are required.
    Regards,
    Satish

    Hello Satish,
    Please find the configuration guide for the same
    https://websmp102.sap-ag.de/srm-inst
    Select SAP SRM Server 7.01 - Configuration Guides for SAP SRM Ehp1 - SAP SRM 7.0 EHP1: Strategic Sourcing
    This has all the steps.
    Hope it solves.
    Ashutosh

  • Two envelope bidding

    Hi All,
    Two envelope bidding is available in SRM PPS and also in SRM 7 ehp1.
    Pls suggest what is the best option choosing which one to go for, if our requirement is to use bidding with two envelope.
    Abdul Raheem

    Hi Abdul,
    You can use the Two Envelop bidding directly in 7.01 by activating the business function - SRM_SOURCING_1. This will create  new node in customizing - Extended RFx.
    For PPS the customer needs to buy a license. You can go through the help link below to see if PPS has anything extra to offer based on your requirement that can't be fulfilled otherwise.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/f9/ae4af0294b42f6855ac6da552ceb93/frameset.htm
    Best regards,
    Lalit

  • SRM two Envelope Bidding

    Does anyone knows whether we can open both Technical and Pricing envelope in one Open Date and Time instead of approving Technical Document first and then open Pricing envelope.
    In a nutshell, we are using SRM 7.0 with PPS add on and like to use two envelope bidding, but does not want to approve technical first to see the price. We want to open both at same time and date. Please help.
    Thanks
    Anita

    Hi Anita
    SRM PPS module's one of majaor advantage is Two Envelope Tenders where we can oen the technical bid first, analyse & only for technically accepted bids the Price/commercial bid will be opened.
    If you don't want to use this functionality than you have the option to create a SIngle BID where the vendor will quote both technical & commercial details.
    Both above described cases are SRM standard functionalities available in SRM 7.0 only.
    Choice is your's. I hope I was able to address your querry.
    Sandip

  • Two envelope bidding error

    Hello ,
    We are on SRM 7 EHP1 .
    Netweaver Portal Version 7.3
    We are trying to implement Two envelope bidding
    I have a purchaser role and when i try to create a two envelope Rfx, I am able to open.
    After the Rfx gets opened , when i click on Technical Rfx , i was getting an error like No Iview available for system SAP_SRM object "TechResp".
    I consulted my portal consultant and he replaced my SRM 7 Strategic Purchaser with SRM 7 Ehp1 Strategic purchaser
    Now when i click on Technical Rfx , the error is not repeating but a blank screen appears.
    I have followed all the configuration given in the below
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm701/helpdata/en/a7/ea98848f574388ab21778ddb306c4b/frameset.htm
    Thanks
    Aditya

    Thanks Sam for your inputs but i have already made all the settings mentioned in the cfolder settings link that you shared.
    I wanted to check if there are any more cfolder settings which needs to be taken care apart from what is mentioned in the link.
    Just to give you more information , our cfolders is defined in the SRM system itself. So i have created an RFC which points to SRM itself and leaving the user name and pwd blank in the Logon data tab of RFC connection but  for  point no. 3 where it is mentioned that RFC user must be given the SAP_CFX_USER role , since i have no RFC user , I couldnt assign any roles.
    Is this correct ?
    And in the config step , Basic data for Technical RFX Response folders , where the default five folders related to two envelope bidding are listed, these should get created as soon as the Purchaser clicks on Technical rfx as per the help.sap documentation but in my case , it is not redirecting to the Cfolder collaboration room.
    Want to also check that  in Portal, are there any Cfolder roles or any other role which needs to be given to the Purchaser ?
    To summarize the steps i have done till now.
    1. Have performed the two envelope bidding config steps mentioned below.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm701/helpdata/en/a7/ea98848f574388ab21778ddb306c4b/frameset.htm
    2. Have performed the Cfolder settings mentioned in the below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm70/helpdata/en/43/143d2e25fc2be8e10000000a1553f7/content.htm
    3. In SRM GUI,
    Have assigned Purchaser with
    a.Strategic Purchaser EHP1 role
    b. SAP_CFX_USER
    c. SAP_CFX_ADMINSTRATOR
    In Portal , have assigned Purchaser with
    a. Strategic Purchaser EHP1 role
    And Hi Lalit, Good to hear from you. Thanks for your inputs . Your points 1 and 3 have already been taken care.
    I tried adding the Cfolder link to the ITS_DEST but it didnt help. Can you help me with any more pointers.
    Thanks
    Aditya

  • Cfolder in two envelope rfx

    Dear SAP SRM Guru's,
    I want to ask about cfolder in two envelope process, i configured cfolder base on sap help, and what i read in SCN
    The process that i understand are:
    1. Purchaser with role SAP_CFX_USER and SAP_CFX_COMP_CREATOR, create RFX, automatically a in cfolder system will create a folder called a technical details in collaborative scenario,
    - My question are : can we automatically change the name of the folder? or we have to change it manually?
    2. after the rfx publish, the bidder with role SAP_CFX_USER will create the technical rfx response, the cfolder system will automaticallly create a folder in the technical detail folder created by the purchaser, the folder will be name based on username bidder, maybe the structure will be like below
    -Technical Details
    -- Technical_bid
    --- Supplier2
    ---- Tech_bid
    My problem for this process are :
    - when i log on using the bidder user, i cannot see the technical details folder, so after that i log on using adminstrator, and gave authorization to the bidder user in Technical Details, after that i can see the technical detail folder, is it the correct way to use the cfolder? so i have to gave authorization manually to the bidder?
    - may next problem is when i have two bidder, the bidder can see other bidder folder, is it the behaviour or there something i miss?
    can someone help me?

    Hello Aditya,
             Answering your questions one by one...
    1. Can we change the Folder name "Technical Details"?
              Yes , we can. This is set via the code in class /SAPPSSRM/CL_TECHBID_CFOLDER method /SAPPSSRM/IF_TECHBID_CFOLDER~CREATE_BI. In this there is a call
    CALL FUNCTION '/SAPPSSRM/META_CREATE_COLLAB'
         EXPORTING
           i_folder_name      = /sappssrm/if_tendering_const=>gc_cfx_name
         IMPORTING
           e_faultstring      = lv_cfx_faultstring
           e_collaboration_id = e_collaboration_id
           e_public_area_id   = e_public_area_id
           e_root_folder_id          = e_root_folder_id
         EXCEPTIONS
           no_logical_system_defined = 1
           OTHERS                    = 2.
    The constant /sappssrm/if_tendering_const=>gc_cfx_name is the "Technical Details" is the name and you can change the name by performing the enhancements here.
    2. Do you need administrator to provide access to folders for bidder?
          No certainly not required. Generally at RFX Response creation system will provide read/write authorizations to the bidders for specific folders. This is handled in the code and you would not require an Administrator intervention here.
    3. Bidder having access to other folders?
        This is a result of your manual assignment. The standard code ensures none of this happens.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Veera

  • Contacts Envelope Print Error

    I have figured out how to print an envelope with a return address, and proper layout even without the bar code (Hello Apple - it's 2015) and the limited text formatting options, but now Contacts prints two envelopes with each print request.
    The problem is that every other envelope prints the addressee name in the line where the street address is on the correctly printed other envelope (which is what I see in preview window).  No street address, city or zip, just the name in the line where the address should be.
    Under the Preview window within the print dialog window is this 'Two addresses()'
    I dont see another address card anywhere for this contact, so where is the other address that I need to delete to stop wasting envelopes?

    Go to your Finder "Go" menu hold the option key to choose "Library".
    Then go to Application Support/AddressBook/AddressBook.data and double-click that.

  • Change Mail content for standard mail 'Simultaneous logon approval required' in 2 Envelop RFx

    Hi Experts,
    Please suggest, we have a requirement where we need to Change Mail content for standard mail 'Simultaneous logon approval required' and Simultaneous Logon Successful in 2 Envelop RFx in SRM.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

    Hi Gaurav,
    please implement BADI /SAPPSSRM/BD_SIM_LOGIN
    Enhance Simultaneous Logon
    Use
    You can use this Business Add-In (BAdI) to incorporate customer-specific functions into the initiation and completion processes for simultaneous logon and to adapt simultaneous logon e-mail notifications.
    Method PROCESS_FINISH
    You use this method to add customer-specific functions to the simultaneous logon process. This method is called on completion of the simultaneous logon process.
    The following parameters are provided
    IV_EXT_GUID
    Process ID of the external process
    IV_MODE
    Indicates the mode of the e-mail function (completion)
    CV_SUCCESS
    Indicates whether the process was successful
    IV_SET_GUID
    Process ID of the customer-specific process
      Method PROCESS_INIT 
    You use this method to add customer-specific functions to the simultaneous logon process. This method is called on initiation of the simultaneous logon process.
    The following parameters are provided:
    IV_EXT_GUID
    Process ID of the external process
    IV_MODE
    Indicates the mode of the e-mail function (initiation)
    IV_SET_GUID
    Process ID of the customer-specific process
      Method SIM_EXT_MAIL 
    You use this method to change the content of the e-mail sent to participants on successful initiation, completion or failure of the simultaneous logon session and to define the external process that is calling the simultaneous logon application.
    The following parameters are provided:
    IV_OBJECT_ID
    Business object identifier
    IV_MODE
    Indicates the mode of the e-mail function (initiation, completion or failure)
    IV_EXT_MODE
    Indicates the external process, for example, technical RFx response opening, of the calling application. This could be any process for which you want to use simultaneous logon.
    CT_MAIL_BODY
    Content of the e-mail
    CV_MAIL_SUB
    Subject line of the e-mail
    Standard settings
    If the customer does not define a BAdI implementation, SAP delivers a default BAdI implementation. The default implementation incorporates the simultaneous logon process with the two-envelope RFx response process. You cannot use the simultaneous logon process with standard RFxs in the default implementation.
    Activities
    Information about the implementation of BAdIs in the context of the enhancement concept is available in the SAP Library for SAP NetWeaver under BAdIs - Embedding in the Enhancement Framework.
    Regards,
    raghuveer

  • Duplicate messages and duplicate Envelope Index files - why?

    I am getting duplicate emails in my Mail POP account. I thought it would be a good idea to rebuild after deleting the Envelope Index file. I discovered that there were two; Envelope Index and Envelope Index-1. It occurred to me that would be a problem. I deleted both and started Mail and rebuilt and they are both back! Why would there be two of these files? Is this the cause of the duplicate mail problem? How do I get rid of the extra one?

    I should add that several of the Envelope Index files are in two different places; the bulk are in Library/Mail/V2-Temp.noindex/MailData/, the rest are in Library/Mail/

  • Print two addressees on one address from Address Book

    Hi,
    I would like to send out a mailing to friends and family. I would like to print all the names of individuals living on the same address on the same envelope. Address Book wants me to send two envelopes, one for each, it seems.
    Any solutions for this?

    Nowadays, this means that they must share a single iCloud account.  If they do that, then yes, they will share all email for that iCloud account.  If they also want to use other features of iCloud (they do not have to enable these) like backups and synchronization of contacts, notes or documents, then they will also be sharing the same storage for things.  That may cause clashes, if for example, they maintain separate contact lists.
    There is no reason that they cannot create another AppleID using a free email address (gmail, hotmail, aol, yahoo, or whatever) to separate things if they wish to have their own iCloud accounts.  This would also allow them to have separate iMessage accounts.  If they use the one AppleID for iMessage, then they will be sharing all of eachothers messages as well.
    Usually, people tend to find that sharing an iCloud and an iMessage account is less than desirable.  However, they can simply get another AppleID and keep those services separate.  If they wish to share purchased content, they can continue to use the single shared AppleID for the iTunes, App and iBook stores.
    Each service that Apple offers can be used with a separate AppleID, and you can have as many AppleIDs as you wish.

  • Latent volume envelope response?

    STP seems to be responding 'late' (like 400ms or so) to sudden changes in volume. By default, my track volume is set to 0dB ... if I add a music clip, then adjust the volume down for that clip, I get a loud section of music before the volume drops.
    I zoomed in on the envelope that STP automatically created, at the beginning of the music clip. There are two envelope points at 'virtually' the same time. The first point is at 0dB, and the second point is aligned with the beginning of my audio track and is at -6dB.
    If I play over this section again and again, the result is inconsistent! Sometimes, the clip begins at the proper volume, and sometimes I get the spike in volume before it drops! I thought this would be fixed when I exported my mix to AIF, but the spikes are ever-present in the rendered files!
    I have this problem consistently when I use volume envelopes, but not if I use clip fades.
    Is there some STP setting I need to adjust? Buffer or something? Anyone else with this problem?

    I've seen this problem with differing sample rates between project, files, and export selection.
    Make sure they are all the same (for example 44khz0 and see if that helps your problem.

  • How long does it take for the warehouse to show a phone as recieved so I can pay my final bill?  I would like to sign up for Verizon again as I am very unsatisfied with my new company but cannot until this is resolved.

    I recently switched to another competitor but would actually like to start from scratch with Verizon but cannot do so because they cannot locate my devices I mailed in to their warehouse.  I switched my whole family's accounts, 3 phones and 1 mobile hotspot, to a competitor to get a cheaper rate and unlimited data but I have not been happy with their service and would like to switch back.  The problem is when switching the first time I was told by a Verizon chat rep that I could send my Edge devices back in and would get credit for them and stop my edge payments which was not the way I know now it is supposed to work.  After a couple of phone calls a supervisor looked at my online chat transcript and realized that I was correct and the rep had told me incorrectly that they would take my edge phones back and give me credit for them and I could close my account by only paying the early termination fees.  She sent me two envelopes to send my two edge phones back in and said they would credit on my account and stop the monthly billing for them once they were received.  I called a couple of weeks ago after being charged 24.99 for the both of them again for the month after my account was stopped.  They said that they had not received my phones and I should have noted the tracking number from the labels the rep sent me so they could track them.  I tried to find the tracking numbers but couldn't so I got back on live chat and asked them to resend me the letter from the supervisor rep as well as resending the labels and he said they could that and it should be 7-10 business days.  It has now been over two weeks and I have not received the resent letter or labels so I cannot give them the tracking number to prove I sent my phones back to them.  I have also researched the facility I was asked to send these phones back to and it seems this is a pretty common Verizon trick of making you prove you sent the phones and not giving you any access to the tracking numbers.  I just want to pay my ETF's and close out my original account so I can start over fresh with Verizon but now I am losing faith in doing that as this is making me wonder if they are the type of company I want to deal with.  Please someone who may have dealt with this help me restore my faith in Verizon and give me an idea of what to do next.

    How recently did you switch?  If it's less than 60 days, then Verizon simply reinstates your previous account.  The fact that you were on the EDGE plan and mailed the devices back, and they apparently are somewhere in the system, could cause complications, and it might just work out that you just go back on the same plan and they set you up with the same devices.  I'm not sure how it will go - but since you are still being billed for the devices... 

  • Security deposit or earnest deposit money in tendering process

    Dear Experts,
    Our client is planning to use two envelope bidding process along with tender fee and earnest deposit money/security deposit fee. They are going for SRM 7.01 along with ECC6.0 Ehp5. I get to know that along with SRM7 ehp1, SAP has retrofitted two envelope bidding process into standard SAP SRM.
    Does it support tender fee and earnest deposit money in the two envelope bidding process in the stabndard SAP SRM 7.01 or the client has to go for SAP PPS for using the two different fee submission by vendors?
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Hi,
    Yes, SRM 7.01 could suppot the both Security deposit and earnest deposit money in tendering process,
    So that, no need to go for PPS
    Plz refer below link for detailed process under config guide for SRM 7.0 EHP1
    https://websmp208.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000730474&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&
    Many Thanks,
    Venkat

  • Multi Plot XY Graph. One Plot Envlope, checking to make sure the other plot falls within the enclope plot

    Hi Guys
    Have a problem with XY graphing, I have 5 xy samples that define an envlope (one plot), samples need to be checked to make sure they are within the selected envlope.
    Any Ideas ?

    Can you split the 4 xy point for your envelope int two envelopes:
    Upper Limit 0,0 3,6 9,9
    Lower Limit 3,0 9,9 (or maybe 0,0 3,0 9,9 if you need to start at x=0)
    Then in your limit check connect both upper and lower envelopes.
    Have a look at the attached vi, it's not very tidy and there may be a problem with the number of samples in the various arrays, it may give you some ideas to try.
    Attachments:
    Check_Envelope.vi ‏72 KB

  • Not able to change authorization in c-folder for zrole

    Hi Experts,
                      we are implementing two envelope bidding for SRM 7.0,Here For technical Evaluator ,we have to create a saparate workarea in c-folder.The roles assiged to technical Evaluator is SAP_CFX_USER for c-folder.Now while i was creating the workarea for technical evaluator, i t was throwing me the error.Cfolder.NoAuthorization.Owner....To remove this Error i assiged
    a authorization object 'ACO_SUPER'..now i was able to create the folder but the problem is..Technical Evaluator is having administration authorization for Public area.
    And i am not able to change the authorization..I tries using CFX_ACO_API_ACTIVITIES_SET  and by passing 'Read' auth in badi parameter  ct_cfx_auth but it is not chaging..
    I am  totally out of clues what to do?????please suggest..

    Hi,
    Can I know how you were able to change authorizations for the cFolders?
    Ganapathi

Maybe you are looking for