Two Identity Profile Problems

For years I have been able to have open two Identity Profiles in Firefox. One for my wife and one for me so we can have our own Yahoo and Facebook accounts open at the same time on one computer. With in the last couple of weeks it will log me out of both Yahoo & Facebook accounts on Profile 2 but Profile 1 continues to stay logged in. Every time I relogin to my accounts on Profile 2 within about a minute or two Facebook will tell me "Your not logged in" and close me out and my Yahoo account will rest to the sign in screen.

You could try checking your proxy setting in Profile 2. Definitely Yahoo is sensitive to this. Please see the following thread: [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/930519 I am able to log in to Yahoo mail but it keeps asking me for my password every 2 or 3 mins].
Does it help?

Similar Messages

Two identical profile in system preference – display – color?

Hello to all.
I am a new Mac user and I would ask for clarification.
My hobby is photography.
When selecting a different color profile in the Display preferences pene in system preferences I noticed that I have two profiles with the same name (for example two name of Adobe RGB (1998), sRGB, ...).
I wonder why there are two identical profiles with the same name?
I have installed CC Photoshop, Lightroom 5 and Nik software filters.
I have Maverick X OS system with all updates.
Thanks for the reply.
Tomaz

Hello to all.
I am a new Mac user and I would ask for clarification.
My hobby is photography.
When selecting a different color profile in the Display preferences pene in system preferences I noticed that I have two profiles with the same name (for example two name of Adobe RGB (1998), sRGB, ...).
I wonder why there are two identical profiles with the same name?
I have installed CC Photoshop, Lightroom 5 and Nik software filters.
I have Maverick X OS system with all updates.
Thanks for the reply.
Tomaz

Problem storing two identical qualifications with different proficiencies

Hi Experts,
I am trying to store qualifications in infotype 0024 (although the actual data ends up in HRP1001). My issue is that if an employee holds two identical qualifications (ex. CPR) with two proficiencies (ex. basic and advanced), the system will not let me store both of them. It either forces the earlier one's date to be delimited, thus making it no longer valid, or if the date range for the qualifications are the same, deletes the earlier one entirely and just saves the new one.
I know that this is because the key is duplicated in HRP1001. BUT, HRP1001 also contains a SEQNR field that should handle this, but I cannot get it to work? Is there a way to activate HRP1001-SEQNR?
I have tried playing with the time constraints. I assume that '3' is the one to use, but I still can't get all of the qualifications to save.
Any ideas??
Thanks in advance!
Shane LaBonte

Hi Roman,
I want to use the Qualifications infotype because we need the data in e-recruitment as well.
I used CPR as a broad example. I am in the K-12 Education sector. A real-life example would be an employee that holds the qualification: Intermediate & Senior. The proficiency of this qualification could be: Music. Another could be: Law.
There is a college that all teachers must register through to get their qualifications recognized. We are at their mercy in terms of how a qualification is defined. And because of the sheer number of qualifications that could exist (we're talking upwards of 1000), we DO NOT want to get into any sort of mappings between a qualification coming from the college converted into a different qualification recorded at our end.
Any ideas? I know this problem is quite unique.
Thanks
Shane

Problem with ORA-06502 when exp/imp between two identical versions

Hi
I have two identical systems, one system that I develop on and
the test system. The two systems have the same version of the
Portal. When I export and then import the application from the
systems I get a error message on the test system.
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number
conversion error (WWV-11230)
This error does not appear on the developing system.
The application I have is a form on a table, and I have some
buttons with PL/SQL handels on them. I tried to remove this code
and export with no luck.
Please help.
The system:
Windows NT
Oracle Portal 3.0.8.9.8
Thanks
Jvrgen Swensen

Could you pls confirm : Have you exported & Imported the shared
components used by that form?
If you are not too worried about the templates/fonts then try
this:
Click on "Edit" link against that form and click "OK".
Thanx,
Chetan.

How to sync two firefox profiles, everything except localstore.rdf

Yesterday, I asked about linking cache between two firefox profiles:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/925836
And I got to thinking. The only reason I'm even making a second profile is to have two "saved window locations" for multi-monitor purposes. I want these profiles to be EXACTLY the same except for the location in which they are opened (which is saved in localstore.rdf). It occurred to me that with my current setup in the above thread, even though the caches are now linked.. I will still have to change bookmarks twice. Have two different histories, saved passwords, etc. All minor inconveniences at best, but it would still be nice to avoid them!
Like I said, I want these profiles identical except for the locations in which they are opened. I know there are extensions for syncing profiles, but they all seem to be 1 star performance hindering messes. I'd rather do it manually, as I did with the cache. Possible?

I do not know enough to give a proper answer but some comments that may help:
I am not sure I follow what you ask. Is the saved Windows location you are interested in the coordinates and size of the Window that Firefox view opens in ?
I have never worked with [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Localstore.rdf localstore.rdf], but I have often manually edited [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profiles.ini_file profiles.ini] which points to the profile, that in turn contains the [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Places.sqlite places.sqlite] (bookmarks and history database) and your cache.
If you are interested in the cachecontents:
* use about:cache
* note there are addons that help with viewing cache content
I am not too clear on what you are doing. If you use ''-no-remote'' and start up a Firefox instance with a particular profile then that sees the same bookmarks as any other instance or version of Firefox started with the same profile, but a profile can not be opened twice simultaneously by Firefox. (My understanding of what you say in the other thread is that you have no problem with that.)
Rather clunky and slow, but you could consider writing simple DOS batch files that will modify commandlines or copy files as part of launching Firefox.

Certificate error on only one of two identical systems?

I recently installed two COMPLETELY identical Ubuntu 12.04 systems, PC01 and PC02. The browser is latest version of Mozilla Firefox.
When visiting https://www.komplett.dk/k/signin.aspx with PC01, the connection is secure and everything is OK, no error messages. When visiting the same URL with PC02, the following error message is shown:
This Connection is Untrusted
You have asked Firefox to connect securely to www.komplett.dk, but we can't confirm that
your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely, sites will present trusted identification to prove
that you are going to the right place. However, this site's identity can't be verified.
What Should I Do?
If you usually connect to this site without problems, this error could mean that someone is
trying to impersonate the site, and you shouldn't continue.
Get me out of here!
Technical Details
www.komplett.dk uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
I understand the Risks
Why is this happening when the systems are COMPLETLY identical? i have tried to delete the profile folder on both systems, but the result is the same. NO certificates has been manually installed on PC01, so that is not the reason. The file size of cert8.db on PC01 is 94K and on PC02 it is 64K, I do not understand how the size can be different when the profiles are newly created.
I would really like to find out why I am experiencing different behaviour with Firefox, on two identical systems, so any suggestions or ideas are very welcome.

The Technical Details show:
<blockquote>www.komplett.dk uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is not trusted because no issuer chain was provided.
(Error code: sec_error_unknown_issuer)
</blockquote>
The www.komplett.dk server doesn't send a required intermediate certificate.
*VeriSign Class 3 Extended Validation SSL SGC CA
You can inspect the certificate chain via a site like this:
*http://www.networking4all.com/en/support/tools/site+check/
You can install the intermediate certificate from networking4all site or from this VeriSign page (it is the second one).
*http://www.verisign.com/support/verisign-intermediate-ca/extended-validation-pro/index.html
Copy the certificate text to a .cer text file and import this file in the Certificate Manager.
*Options/Preferences > Advanced > Encryption: Certificates - View Certificates

Color profile problem/question.

These two exports of the same file were taken on my spouse's D300s, and are good examples of a profile problem I cannot seem to solve. This is the identical problem I also experience on the Nikon D700 and D3. The following was exported with the "Camera Standard" profile, and notice the yellow sun reflection on the door panels:
The following was exported with a xrite generated lightroom profile. Notice the better overall contrast, but also the horrendous unnatural yellow on the same door:
This difference causes all sorts of distortion in natural animal hair that contains any red-orange. I use these doors because they are such a stark example. Any attempts to correct with the WB will usually result in too much blue elsewhere. Also I have created many test profiles under many light conditions (both manually and from LR), and they all cause this problem in all three cameras. This is not a matter of one bad cameral, or one erroneously created profile.
I have two questions: Does this example show up well enough to see what I am talking about? If so, can anyone speculate as to the problem or solution? Even guesses would be appreciated since I am out of my own, and not expert in this sort of thing. Thanks!

George, thank you for this information. I have a couple of things for you to try and another question. The ColorChecker Passport color patches are small, so I would suggest trying to reshoot a calibration image with the ColorChecker Passport in the center and filling at least 1/3 of the picture width. In the image you provided the ColorChecker Passport is about 1/8 the image width and far left of center. I know, I know, it should not matter, but give it a try. This is what I'm doing to create camera profiles for all three of my camera bodies (Canon 300D, 600D, 5D MKII), and I have not had a single problem with "color matching" using this procedure AND what I will describe next.
Concerning white balance procedure you say:
Using the grey card of the same product placed just outside the subject crop.
I assume you are referring to the large 60% reflectance white balance card on one side of the ColorChecker Passport, but you do not mention how you set white balance. I suggest using the LR white balance eyedropper tool with the smaller 80% reflectance gray scale patch on the ColorChecker Classic target side. This is the 2nd patch from the left bottom in your picture right next to the brightest 90% white patch. Two reasons for doing this! A higher reflectance patch reduces the influence of camera noise in the image with the LR 5 x 5 pixels eyedropper tool. Here's a LR forum post with a heated discussion on these issues (or lack thereof): http://forums.adobe.com/thread/854734?tstart=60 The second purely empirical reason is the "Classic" target side provides me with more accurate white balance than using the larger 60% card. Perhaps this is a defect with my ColorChecker Passport target, but I don't know.
When setting white balance with the LR eyedropper tool I suggest taking at least five (5) samples of the 80% patch. I use the center, TL, TR, BR and BL corner areas of the patch. Do not use any reading that has a large variation from the others. Please remember that the eyedropper tool is sampling a very small 5 x 5 (25 pixels) area, and image noise or a target paint defect can give you a bogus reading. Write down the temp and tint for each of the five (5) readings, add them, and divide by five to get the "average" white balance temp and tint. Enter the temp and tint values manually into the white balance tool. I create a user preset for each profile which contains only the ColorChecker created camera profile and manually adjusted white balance settings.
I would also suggest you check the readings of all six (6) grayscale patches for neutrality (R=G=B) using your new camera profile and white balance settings. I have found in some cases using the 65% reflectance patch (3rd patch in) provides the most neutral “overall” white balance setting for the six (6) patches. This is despite the fact it contains more camera noise than the 80% patch next to it. Again, this observation is purely empirical – I am not writing a scientific thesis! It works for me and hopefully it will get you closer to what you want.
One thing I am going to do tomorrow is borrow a friends color checker to rule out the possibility mine is defective. It doesn't look defective, but the problem is so consistent.
This is a very good idea! Having worked in a manufacturing environment for over 45 years, trust me when I tell you defective product from even the largest company ends up in the consumer’s hands. Please let us know what you find.

Can I have two identical PCs with clones of the same hard drive?

This all started when I had a problem with my first pc, a gateway laptop, would not wake up from sleep due to, supposedly, a driver problem. I didn't want to send it off for my free, under-warrantee, repair and be without a computer for however long that
would take. So I bought another one and took it to a local dealer to clone the hard drive of the first one to put on the new one.
This created a number of odd problems which eventually I figured out had something to do, it seemed, with Microsoft not allowing two identical machines to exist like that. I only plan to use one, the other one being exclusively for backup or in case something
happened to the first. But I think the problems occurred when I tried to switch back and forth, to do some texting.
Is there a way I can accomplish this?
Thanks.

Until Windows 7, it was possible to use two identical PCs with same clone. Provided, both the PCs must be legally licensed to use the Windows operating system (version as well as edition) and of same OEM, model and spec. This is possible because, the product
keys are common for all the PCs of same OEM build (if preinstalled, and the installed product key is different from the one mentioned in COA). This made OEM builders to distribute to more PCs than the license agreement, which is impossible for Microsoft to
find out. To solve this issue, Microsoft changed the licensing structure from Windows 8 - embedding the product key in BIOS. So, here, only the installation is provided and the product keys are not common for all the PCs even if they are of the same OEM build.
Therefore, cloning fails here. And naturally, as Team Zigzag and EC Ltd say, same product key can't be used for more than one PC.
As to restore the PC in case of an emergency, you can perform a backup of the existing installed software and user files, which can be restored later (File History in Windows 8). The following links may be helpful:
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-8/what-happened-to-backup-restore
http://blogs.technet.com/b/keithmayer/archive/2013/09/17/backup-amp-recovery-of-windows-8-windows8-itpro-tipoftheday.aspx#.UkC-hmLrbIU
Balaji Kundalam

How can I prevent two different profiles from interfering with one another?

I have a serious profiles problem. I created a new profile with Profile Manager and then copied a well-established profile's contents into its directory before starting the new profile. Now, when I start either profile, it contains whatever tabs I had in the previously opened profile. I deleted a bunch of tabs and a window from the new profile but when I opened it after having opened and closed the old profile, the tabs and window reappeared. If I open some tabs in the new profile and then close it and open the old profile, the tabs appear in it, and vice versa.
I open the original profile through a shell script:
<pre>/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox -P "profile 1"</pre>
I open the second one the same way but with the <i>-no-remote</i> parameter:
<pre>/Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox -P "profile 1 clone" -no-remote</pre>
Why do the two profiles collide like that and how can I prevent this from happening?

Are you using Sync then ?
Or are you setting a bunch of tabs as the homepage ?
If you cloned a profile they will start off the same and that will include the set of open tabs from the file ''sessionstore.js'' however profiles are independent and so should have there own sessionstore and History once they have been used.

My iPhone has two identical options under "iTunes wi-fi sync" that are the same computer. I only have one user on my computer, and I tried moving my iTunes file in Finder to organize it and now my library's not synced with my phone. Help?

My iPhone has two identical options under "iTunes wi-fi sync" that are the same computer. I only have one user on my computer, and I tried moving my iTunes file in Finder to organize it and now my library's not synced with my phone. Help?

I have the same problem. Right now my iPhone 5S shows 3 instances of the computer to which it is connected under Settings » General » iTunes WiFi Sync. I'm having problems connecting and syncing, and this is probably the cause: the phone chooses one of these connections, and it isn't the one that's actually in use. What's probably happening is that the phone and computer establish a connection using a dynamic IP address, the address becomes "disassociated" due to error, another address is associated, the phone retains each address/link, and each link is displayed as if it represents a separate computer (the fact that the name of the computer is identical is ignored, as the only thing that is considered important is the IP address). But that's all conjecture. More important, I'm not sure how to fix the problem. A network reset doesn't do it.

Please send me ONE reply rather than two identical copies of that one reply

Instead of sending me just ONE email as per "subscriptions," they are sending me TWO identical copies of the email. So if two people send me one reply each, A and B, I end up getting FOUR replies: AA, and BB. Yikes!
I would like to receive just ONE copy. I tried deselecting all of my subscriptions, thinking that I could start fresh and that the problem would correct itself, but the problem persists.
Please, send me only ONE copy rather than two copies.
Thanks mucho.
— Lorna in Southern California

This web page will help you: http://samsoft.org.uk/iTunes/grouping.asp

Color profile problem after installing CS4

OK.
First, let me post these side-by-side comparisons:
As you can see in Image 1 (the "before," left-side photo in each comparison), the colors and overall appearance are distorted. I've read things about gamma but it's all confusing to me. This is surely a color profile problem, right? The transition among pixels that involve colors of yellow and gray is rocky, grainy, and the flat out color is just wrong. Now this color problem affects pictures when opened in both Photoshop 7.0 and the standard Windows Photo Viewer. Meaning, whenever I open pictures in both PS 7.0 and Windows Photo Viewer (my default viewer), this color problem totally messes up certain photos and really damages my ability to edit. I'm an avid photo editor and it's imperative I have proper color display so that I can accurately edit. Keep in mind that certain pictures do not take on this error. When a photo is generally brighter, the distortion is basically invisible. It's photos that are dark or have dark portions in them that display the distortion.
*Note: I took these before-and-after pictures with my camera, because screencapping would not work, since you all don't have the same color profile issue on your computer. That's the only way I can show you!
HOWEVER, when I open photos in another standard Windows application, "Microsoft Office Picture Manager," the color problem is magically erradicated altogether. It shows photos as I've been seeing them all along, until I installed CS4 about two weeks ago. Before installing CS4, everything was fine and I had been using Photoshop 7 for years and have never had a problem. I'm guessing CS4 messed something up. It had to have. Just FYI, I uninstalled CS4, hoping it would reverse the problem. But still, the color issue persists in PS 7 and in my regular Windows Photo Viewer.
Since images display their true form in Windows Office Picture Manager, I don't think I need to calibrate my screen. Or do I? I've read things about it, and to some people, it's not necessary. Right? Okay. I really hope someone can give some advice! Thank you!
P.S. Here's the original photo. On my screen, it looks distorted when opened in photoshop or opened w/the viewer. However, here on Firefox, it's fine.

You should try to familiarize yourself with the concepts of color management.
It's kind of too in-depth a subject to walk you through from a cold start here... There are a lot of good resources out there to help you get started. For example, in just a few seconds Google turned up this:
http://www.adobepress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1315593
The one thing to remember is this: There is NO quick solution, easy set of defaults, or direct answer to making your setup do what you want without your having to understand color management.
People may tell you to calibrate your monitors, or use a particular color profile as a default, or whatever, and they may have good, solid reasons for telling you those things, but if you don't attempt to get your mind around color management it will always seem as though something isn't working right, or is simply magic, which will be frustrating to you.
Here are some basic questions to ponder:
What image color profile is your image carrying?
Is your monitor a wide-gamut display and do you have a color profile set up for it? What kind of monitor is it?
What version of Windows are you running?
Do you know the difference between a color-managed app and one that is not color-managed?
Which of the apps you're using/showing above are color-managed?
What are your settings in Edit - Color Settings?
Take some time and do some research, get your head around the concepts, and it will all make more sense I promise you.
-Noel

I have two Firefox profiles. The default is updated to the latest version. The second profile is version 3.6.25. I cannot get the second profile to update to the latest version. How do I do that?

I do not have administrative authority on this computer but it has never been a problem before with updating.

Thanks Corel. The computer I use at work is the one I'm having problems on. I also do work at home (where I am now) so I also have two Firefox profiles set up on my home computer. On my home computer when I updated the first profile both profiles updated, so I know it SHOULD work that way. On my work computer I did do the Help, About, version check and it told me I had the older version and needed to update, ran me through the update process but still the second profile was not updated. I will try the other two links, if the computer will let me since I'm not an administrator on it. That probably won't be until Monday. I don't really want to bug our director about it because she is so busy. I know that the Shockwave Flash and Java Plugins are outdated but they require administrator privileges to do. Something else I just thought of, every time I start that second profile at work it was saying Firefox was not my default browser, did I want to make it the default browser, I would agree, but still it would happen the next time. When I go into Tools, Options and look, it says Firefox IS my default browser. I finally told it not to check each time it starts. I don't know if this is connected to my original issue or not. Thanks for the advice and I will check it out next week and let you know how things go.

ITunes match gave me two identical copies of the instrumental version - want words!

Imogen Heap's "Ellipse" featured two "CD's" - One featured all her songs sung by her - The other featured all her songs as instrumentals. When syncing with iCloud, iTunes Match gives me access to only the instrumental version of all songs...twice! So now I only have access to two identical copies of the instrumental tracks - no word tracks - help :-(

The original versions are still in your iTunes library, so they haven't taken anything away from you.
It does create problems if you want them on your iOS device though. Unfortunately, I can't give you any idea how to get them on there short of turning match off.
Sorry, it is a problem at the moment, and you are not alone.

Two Identical HDDs + RAID0 + (LVM?) + GPT & GRUB2 + Dual Booting

Hello,
I have been reading about RAID, LVM and GPT. RAID0 is interesting to me since I have two identical HDDs in my laptop and I am looking for better performance and less free-space fragmentation.
My current disk layout looks like the following:
sda:
Primary:
sda1 ntfs system-reserved
sda2 ntfs windows*
Logical:
sda5 ext4 root
sda6 swap
sda7 ext4 personal
sda8 ntfs windows2*
sdb:
sdb1 ext4 multimedia
*windows is the C drive and windows2 is the D drive, just needed extra space so I cut off a part of sda7.
What I want to achieve (and based on my understanding of RAID0) is the following:
GPT:
sdm1 windows
sdm2 boot
sdm3 root
sdm4 home (personal + multimedia from above)
I will use both sda and sdb for this.
Questions:
0. Is that even possible (considering windows)? My expectation is no, unless windows uses the same RAID0 implementation as Linux (partition table/layout data and whatnot). In that case, would it be possible to have something similar to the following:
GPT:
sda:
sda1 windows-c-drive
sdm1 boot
sdm2 root
sdm3 home (personal + multimedia from above)
sdb:
sdb1 windows-d-drive
sdm1 boot
sdm2 root
sdm3 home
* sdm1,2,3 are the RAID partitions laid out over sda and sdb.
1. I am not sure what LVM can offer me other than flexible movement/resizing of partitions, which I don't need.
2. Does RAID0 imply read/write parallelism? Which would provide better read/write performance?
3. Has anyone had experience booting Windows 7 on GPT + RAID0 shared with Linux? (As shown above)
4. Any suggestions as to how to reach my goal?
5. I will need to backup everything and reinstall windows and Arch with RAID, correct? Which I am ready to do anyways.

There is an option in the "BIOS" settings called "Enable UEFI boot". I tried enabling it, nothing changed at all (in other words, no problems arise).
Last edited by fredmorcos (2011-09-17 18:22:23)

Two Identity Profile Problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for