Two integration server on the same sld group

hii,
If I configure two xi integration server to one sld in the same group?
Is it recommended?
Will it cause a collision between the two systems?
tanks in advanced
Royi

Hi,
This can be done as follows,
1. Create multiple Business System Soruce Gropus. When creating the group for the source, you need to give the related integration server . In your case create the Source Busss System Group A and Group B for intregration server A and B.
2. Create Business System Target Group Group C for integration server C which is the target integration server.
3. Assign the source business systems to the correspiodning groups by providing the correct related integration server.
4. Do the same for the target Business Systems as well.
5. Now, go to each of the Source Business System and then select the Transport Targets option and map it to the corresponding business system on the target side. This should be done for all Source Business System of Group A and Group B . They should all point to the correct Business System of Group C.
6. When importing objects you would need to make sure that the Business Systems Being used in the Configuation Scenario all belong to the same Source Business System ., ie. a confgiuration scenario should be such that all business systems used in it belong to either Group A or Group B and not to both.
Regards
Bhavesh

Similar Messages

Can't put two 5508 WLCs in the same RF group

Hi experts,
I have two 5508 WLCs and I want them to be backup to each other. I put in the same "RF Group Name" and even the same "Default Mobility Domain Name" however under Wireless -> 802.11b/g/n -> RRM -> RF Grouping each controller still only have themselves as the only memter to the group.
Two controllers are having management IPs on the same subnet 192.168.161.x/24. AP-manager interfaces are in the same network as well. They can ping each other fine. The following screen shots show the current relavent config on the controller:
I do have two controllers in the same mobility group and they are both showing up...
Does anyone know why they can't add each other to the RF group? All other settings are pretty much default...
Thanks!

Hi,
is there a chance that one of the 2 WLC doesn't contain any access point ? Or that the APs from one WLC are not physically close to the APs of the second WLC ?
The point of RF grouping is to exchange RF information, to make RRM decisions together and to know what ap is a rogue and which is not. RF group information travels over the air from AP to AP.
So if a wlc has no ap of if its APs are not close to those of the other WLC there is both no point in grouping with the other WLC in rf group and also no technical way of doing so.
Regards,
Nicolas
===
Don't forget to rate answers that you find useful

Two Communication Server in the same Server ?

Hi All,
do you know which are the steps and recommendations to install TWO Communication Station in the same server (Windows 2003) ?
The first one is connect to CRM develop system, and the second one to the CRM Quality System.
Regards,
Davide
[email protected]

Hello Davide,
Note 503340 is not valid for 5.0 and above but its major points are still true:
1. Only one default destination can be setup in the DCOM Connector
which is used by the mobile clients after the installation.
2. Only one default COM4ABAP instance can be setup on the
communication station. This COM4ABAP instance is started
automatically after reboot.
DCOM Connector is now .NET Connector and COM4ABAP is now NET4ABAP in 5.0 and higher.
Clearly, connecting to TWO (or more) CRM system has two parts:
a.) For Data Transfer with Conntrans. You can configure A SINGLE COMMSTATION INSTANCE to communicate with MULTIPLE destinations by just adding destinations in the QmtCnfg tool on the CommStation. You can then specify this Commstation and the destination value as you created in the QmtConfg tool on the client and data transfer will work.
b.) For changing passwords of Employees in Tx: SMOEAC. This uses the NET4ABAP service running on the CommStation which is called by the CRM Server. There can be ONLY ONE NET4ABAP service running on a CommStation and this connects to ONLY ONE CRM SYSTEM at a time. Hence it is not possible for one NET4ABAP service to serve multiple CRM systems.
If you need both a and b, it is not possible. If you need only a, it is possible and detailed above and also in the CommStation installation guide.
I also believe you have a message running with SAP Support on this same issue and you would have gotten the same details from them.
Best Regards,
Ankan

How Can I create a cluster of two instances running on the same server?

Hello,
I can't find how to create a cluster or even a failover rule for my two instances running on the same server ODSEE 11gR1.
Could you please help?
Thanks,

Hello,
Clustering (intended as Sun Cluster, Veritas Cluster, etc... ) IS NOT SUPPORTED since 7.0:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E20295_01/pdf/821-1216.pdf [page 20]
and, based on my own experience, is the WORST way of achieving high availability of an LDAP Directory Service and an almost GRANTED way to get replication issues in your topology (lock, split, re-init, etc...).
Please use instead the 'application-level' clustering that you get out of the box with the Multi-Master Replication.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E20295_01/html/821-1217/index.html
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E20295_01/html/821-1220/fhkry.html#scrolltoc
HTH,
Marco

Can we assign two repeating frames to have the same source(group)?

hi all,
can we assign two repeating frames to have the same source(group)?..pls reply soon... bye..

You can assign the same source group to two repeating frames.
For more information on repeating frames, refer to the Oracle Reports Building Reports manual available on OTN: http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/devsuite.html

Server 2012 Failover cluster. Make two VMs stay on the same node

We have a unique situation where i need two machines to stay on the same node. Its a 4 node cluster with 30+ resources but i want to make sure two boxes are ALWAYS on the same now. If one migrates to another node the second needs to follow. Is there
a way to do this?

How an this KB help to stay the two vm's on the same node.
With all do respect @justinv how could this helped you to your problem , your question was "We have a unique situation where i need two machines to stay on the same node. Its a 4 node cluster with 30+ resources but i want to make sure two boxes are ALWAYS
on the same now"
and the KB that elden showed you is for : "Failover clusters that are running inside of virtual machines (sometimes referred to as “guest clusters”) may have problems with nodes joining the cluster."
@justinv cloud you tell us more about this did I misunderstand your question ?
Greetings, Robert Smit Follow me @clustermvp http://robertsmit.wordpress.com/ “Please click "Vote As Helpful" if it is helpful for you and Proposed As Answer” Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you
I explained in one of my replies that my underlying issue was this exactly what the KB fixed..... A guest cluster failing when moved to different nodes. Thats the only reason why i wanted them on the same node to begin with. While this post didn't solve me
original question is solved what my real problem was....

Connect one Business system with two Integration Server

Hello,
Can we able to connect one Business System with two Integration Server?
I have one Business system (ECC 6.0 with the client 900) and it is already connected with PI 7.0 system.Can I able to connect the same sytem (with same client) with PI7.1?
I want to do the HTTP Connection for ABAP Proxy for this two XI system with one business Sytem ?
Is this possible ?Is there any work around solution there?
Thanks.

Hello ,
This document describes about connecting with Two PI7.1 system using Application Server 7.1 and Application Server 7.0 SP14 .
I want to connect same ECC system via abap proxy with two different PI system .One is PI7.0 and another one is PI7.1 system.
Is this possible if i use Application Server 7.1 or Application Server 7.0 SP14 ?
Thanks.
Lakshmi
Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 16, 2009 11:48 PM
Edited by: Muthulakshmi Pandi on Apr 17, 2009 12:21 AM

Is it possible that Exchange UM could be configure with two call managers over the same sip?

Hi,
I have Cisco call manager 8.2 integrated with Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Unified Messaging.
Call manager has primary and secondary server. I created a sip trunk and linked primary CUCM with Exchange. Users can leave and get voice mails.
Problem: In case that primary server is down (WAN is down) the users registered on secondary server but they cannot contact to Exchange Unified Messaging.
I added new UM Dial Plan with the same pilot and associated it to the secondary CUCM server. UM answered but do not recognize the extension number "is not a valid mailbox extension".
Is it possible that Exchange UM could be configure with two call managers over the same sip, the same pilot number, different associated UM servers and get access to the same voice mail boxes?
If not:
Does exist a way to configure Exchange UM that will work if one CUCM server is down?
Thank you,
Peter

Hi,
I have Cisco call manager 8.2 integrated with Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 Unified Messaging.
Call manager has primary and secondary server. I created a sip trunk and linked primary CUCM with Exchange. Users can leave and get voice mails.
Problem: In case that primary server is down (WAN is down) the users registered on secondary server but they cannot contact to Exchange Unified Messaging.
I added new UM Dial Plan with the same pilot and associated it to the secondary CUCM server. UM answered but do not recognize the extension number "is not a valid mailbox extension".
Is it possible that Exchange UM could be configure with two call managers over the same sip, the same pilot number, different associated UM servers and get access to the same voice mail boxes?
If not:
Does exist a way to configure Exchange UM that will work if one CUCM server is down?
Thank you,
Peter

Two processes running at the same time in Lookout

I have installed Lookout 5.0 with 200 I/O Points onto our server computer. The application of motion control is next to the 200 I/O points through OPC PMAC server/client. Now I would like to have a second process in the same server for trouble shooting and testing without stopping the motion control process. However, this second testing process could have also many I/O points through Serial and USB ports. I assume that the total amount of I/O points of both processes will be greater than 200.I prefer to have independent processes for control and testing because access levels. Can I have these two processes running at the same time when needed?

Hi,
From your description you are using a third party OPC server for the motion application. You could have a second Lookout process communicating with the same OPC server with no problems, as long as you do not exceed the number of I/O points your license supports.
Also, the process you are using for testing obviously could not overwrite datamembers (or registers if you will) that would interfere in the overall application, in other words you can test your application as long as you keep the coherency of the test.
So the answer would be, yes it is possible, however you are still limited to the number of I/O's your license supports... You may even consider upgrade the number of I/O's you have in your license.
Best Regards
Andre Oliveira

Exporting two remote objects on the same port

Hi,
I would like to export two remote objects on the same host, same port and bind them with different service names.
There is no problem when I do that from the same Java program.
But when I export and bind an object from a Java program 1, I cannot do the same with the second (and similar) Java program 2. This is the stack trace of my Exception:
java.rmi.server.ExportException: Port already in use: 50040; nested exception is:
     java.net.BindException: Address already in use: JVM_Bind
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.listen(TCPTransport.java:243)
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.exportObject(TCPTransport.java:178)
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPEndpoint.exportObject(TCPEndpoint.java:382)
     at sun.rmi.transport.LiveRef.exportObject(LiveRef.java:116)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.exportObject(UnicastServerRef.java:145)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.exportObject(UnicastServerRef.java:129)
     at java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(UnicastRemoteObject.java:275)
     at java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(UnicastRemoteObject.java:178)
     at java.rmi.server.UnicastRemoteObject.<init>(UnicastRemoteObject.java:75)Can some one help please

It should work in any version of Java as long as the server socket factories are null or equal according to Object.equals() or its override in the SSF.equals() method if any. Which needs to be present and needs to take the form:
public boolean equals(Object object)
return object != null && object.getClass() == this.getClass();
}with further tests if the server socket factories have additional state.

How do I set up two email address on the same account?

Using Mail in Mac OS X 10.6.2 and moving to Mac for the first time, I have been unable to set up two email addresses on the same account. Entering them, separated by commas, as advised in the Help does not seem to work. I have tried making them both the same password and have tried separating the passwords with a comma but no luck. Unable to set up another account for the second address because it correctly tells me that the account already exists.
Is there a way?
Thanks for any help.
AllanGlen

After a comprehensive trial and error session, using a new Guest Account each time to be sure of no contamination from the previous trial, I have finally cracked it!
The problem was logging on to the outgoing server.
Setting up the first account was fairly straightforward but if I allow Mail to do it automatically I am unable to send because Mail has defaulted to 'Authentication Required' when my server does not require it. Setting the account manually without authentication enables send and receive to work OK.
If i try to set up the second account automatically, Mail crashes.
If I set it up manually and choose 'No Authentication', Mail crashes.
If I set it up manually and choose 'Authentication Required' and enter the full email address as the User Name together with password, Mail crashes.
If I set it up manually and choose 'Authentication Required' and enter the first part of the email address together with password, Mail crashes.
However, if I set it up manually and choose 'Authentication Required' and enter the first part of the email address as User Name and no password, Mail accepts it and sets up the account.
At this point the account receives mail but cannot send it.
If I go into the Mail preferences and try to edit the outgoing server details, Mail will not accept no Authentication.
I eventually found that if I uncheck the 'Always Use This Server' box, all account then use the server on the first account, which is correctly set up.
Now I have my four email accounts all able send and receive.
One little concern remains. In Outlook Express I could look at the properties of a received email and see what address it had come from, together with many other details. I haven't found out yet whether this can be done in Mail. I just wonder whether if I reply to some email, it will appear to have come from a different address from the one it was sent to.
Thanks again for all the inputs.
Allan

Can I do multiple installs on one server at the same time ?

Hi. we have a project where the basis group is under very tight deadlines. We are tasked with installing multiple SAP systems on the same server. Is it possible to install more than one SAP systems ( ie ERP, BI, EP, CRM ) on the same physical server at the same time. for example on analyst install ERP while at the same time another analyst do EP and so on.... Has anyone done that before and if so are there any issures. ( I put in a SAP note and got the response that this is not supported, but I just wanted to see if anyone had done it anyways )

Hi Dan,
Frankly simultaneous installations is not a great idea. There will be an enormous competition for resources. Then you also need to make available ports for carrying out the installations. Next it will involve high amount of coordination
What of course is more reasonable is the idea of hosting more than one SAP instance on the same physical server though again harware is a very important concern. It includes your hard disk space,memory,CPU and other generic hardware.
Please award points for useful answers.
Regards.
Ruchit.
Message was edited by:
Ruchit Khushu

Communication between Two WebLogic instances on the same machine

Hi,
We're having a problem with communication between two copies of Weblogic on
the same machine. They are configured with seperate ports (regular and SSL).
Independantly, they run fine. I can access EJBs running on either of them.
The problem is that a bean in one of them has code which attempts to access
an EJB on the other one. The procude fails when trying to obtain the initial
context. This same code works if compilied independantly of WebLogic on the
same machine.
Are there any known issues regards communication between two running
instances of Weblogic on the same machine?
Thanks in advance,
Randy Yarger
marchFIRST
[email protected]

Thanks for the prompt reply.
There is one IP address (internal address 10.227.1.34) one the machine. WLS1
is set up at ports 7001 and 5133. WLS2 is setup at ports 7004 and 7005.
When WLS1 attempts to obtain a context to WLS2 with the URL
t3://10.227.1.34:7004/ it pauses for a long period of time. Running truss
on the both WLS processes shows communication occuring between the two
followed by long periods of silence. Finally WLS2 spits out the error
ConnectionException[7001,7001,5133,5133,7001,7001] (paraphrased, I can get
the entire error if it would help).
After another long pause, WLS1 quits trying with the error 'Server
10.227.1.34:7004 not found' (again paraphrased).
Among the things we've tried:
* Changing the URL from the IP to 127.0.0.1
* Enabling/disabling SSL on either or both WLSs.
* Changing the server name in WLS2's copy of weblogic.properties from
'myserver' to 'myserver2' (previously they were both 'myserver')
* Upgrading WLS2 to 5.1.0sp5 (Tried upgrading WLS1, but was getting class
not found errors and quit because that WLS is being used by other people)
This is a Solaris server. WLS1 is running 5.1.0 and WLS2 is running 5.1.0sp5
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Best,
Randy Yarger
marchFIRST
[email protected]
"Michael Girdley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
There should not be. What is your network configuration? Are they on
separate IP addresses?
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Randy Jay Yarger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hi,
We're having a problem with communication between two copies of Weblogicon
the same machine. They are configured with seperate ports (regular andSSL).
Independantly, they run fine. I can access EJBs running on either of
them.
The problem is that a bean in one of them has code which attempts toaccess
an EJB on the other one. The procude fails when trying to obtain theinitial
context. This same code works if compilied independantly of WebLogic onthe
same machine.
Are there any known issues regards communication between two running
instances of Weblogic on the same machine?
Thanks in advance,
Randy Yarger
marchFIRST
[email protected]

A server with the same hostname could not be found!

Hi macusers,
I saw that error on multiple threads but I found none related to my issue. So, before ignore it let's describe it:
Two MAC Mini: one early 2009 and second late 2010. Both OS 10.9.1, MacKeeper installed, 6+Gb for RAM. Both uses the same router to connect the internet. Both are LAN connected not WiFi. I even changed the DNS addresses on router using Google DNS.
On Mac 2009:
1. Safari opens pages randomly. Sometimes a website is not open but when I create a new tab and select the website from bookmarks the website is opened while in previous tab still says: Safari cannot find the server .... All those websites are used in my daily work. I am not reseting Safari unless necesary.
2. MAIL is showing online only Gmail acccount from 4 accounts. The rest of the accounts are not Gmail and appear as Offline. I restart MAIL and they appear online. I have to do that Open/Close MAIL several times a day.
3. Sharefile and oDesk Team application cannot be opened because of that error: A server with the same hostname could not be found!
4. Apple Store is displaying questions marks instead of the icons and I can barely see what softwares I have installed.
Now the beauty. Only on MAC 2009 I am experiencing those issues. The other MAC is fine. So far.
What I tried so far:
A. Reboot in SafeMode and Repair Permissions, Repair Disk. Everything OK.
B. PRAM Reset and SMC Reset.
C. Scan for viruses. No virus detected.
oDesk Team app is working fine on the other MAC and I managed to install it on Mac 2009 on Windows 7 partition as well. Is working fine.
Here are some screenshots showing you some of the errors I am picking on my side.
That one is taken while trying to connect to ShareFile. After three or four attempts it finally managed to connect.
That was a beauty. While MacKeeper was showing me that I am Offline, I was talking on Skype with a friend.
Still cannot access oDesk Team application. However, after several attempts it is logging but what is showing me is a real nightmare.
If I choose to see my contracts (though in the upper corner there is not my account) they do appear:
Any valuable entry will be highly appreciate it.
Warm regards,
Sebastian
P.S. I just remembered that I saw on a post in here related to the same error that someone from Apple asked a guy to make a test in terminal using a command line. I do it on my MAC and here is the result:
Message was edited by: sebdea

Hi Grant,
Here is what I did and so far seems it is wworking.
1. I deleted oDesk and ShareFile. I removed them using MacKeeper (I found this application very usefull for uninstalling applications as MacKeeper looks for them all over the computer: cache, preferences, application support etc.) While for oDesk is simple as I can look myself for oDesk in any file names, whith ShareFile was a little tricky to amke it amnually as MacKeeper find files that contain Citrix name then ShareFile. I will not guess unless I would search the internet on how to manually remove sharefile from my system.
2. I manually delete all cahe files and folders from ~Library and ~User/Library.
3. After reboot I installed Onyx and order maintanance where I checked all its options, including but not limited to DNS caches, fonts caches, everything.
4. After I reboot computer, I went in Disk Utility and Repaired permissions.
Reboot again. Now seems to work fine. At least odesk Team is working properly. I will have a second thought for installing ShareFile.
Some romanian mac users suggested to check my router connectivity and change some DNS in it. Looks like that was also a problem on some MACs. I recall the few weeks ago I had an issue with TP Link router. My computer wasn't connected to internet, though router showed that there is internet connection. I ping router from my computer and I received answer from ping. I ping google from computer, nothing. I ping google from router, was wroking. I connected the computer directly to internet without router, was wroking. When connected back through router, nothing. I contacted the guys from TP Link and they suggested to use google DNS instead of those my ISP provided. But since then I had not experienced any issue with router and internet, until now. The DNS are still those from google.
I will keep you updated if any issues are appear again. So far, it is working perfectly as it supposed to work.
Warm regards,
Sebastian

Two servers (serverSocket) behind the SAME firewal !?l

Hello !
I dont know if this is the right forum for this qusetion,
and maybe the question is really stupid, but ...
I made a little client/server application, just to
play around with sockets and serverSockets.
It works fine, but now i ask myself:
What happens, if there are two of my servers running on two
different computers in the SAME LAN behind the SAME
firewall/internetgateway, and both are listening on the SAME
port ?
F.e. if the extern IP of this LAN/(its gateway) is
204.556.234.123, and a client in the internet is connecting
to it on the port, on which the two servers behind the firewall
are listening, WHO'S ANSWERING ?
(If this port is set to "open and forward" in the firewall)
The one with the shorter patch-cable ? ;)
How is it possible for the client to differenciate
this two servers in that LAN?
The only logical solution i found is that this two servers
have to listen on different ports,
but i think there has to be another explanation and/or solution.
Do i have to take care about situations like that in my
server-application ?
I have the feeling that i have to...somehow.
OK, you see i dont know much about this...
i would be very thankful for every hint and explanation.
Thank you very much,
greetings,
huni.

F.e. if the extern IP of this LAN/(its gateway) is
204.556.234.123, and a client in the internet is
connecting
to it on the port, on which the two servers behind the
firewall
are listening, WHO'S ANSWERING ?
(If this port is set to "open and forward" in the
firewall)Whichever one the firewall is told to forward it to!
The two computers running your server have unique addresses on the internal network. The firewall will forward incoming connections to one of those addresses. Maybe it can do some simple "load balancing" by forwarding some connections to one server and some to the other, but still, any particular connection will only go to one server.

Two integration server on the same sld group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for