Two ISPs - A&B

Hi Experts,
I am stucked with a scenerio and requesting suggestion to make that functional.
1) We having two locations (eg Location A & B) with nearby distance. Both location are having WAN connectivities with different ISPs say ISP A & ISP B..
2) At both locations we are using Cisco 7200 Rtr and Cisco 2960 switch.
3) Both locations switches are connected with each other(with Gigabit port).
3) Both locations having its own users(LAN) on 192.168.1.0/24 & 192.168.2.0/24 pool respectively.
4) Both end switch are functional with Vlans.
Desired Connectivity should be.
If Location-A WAN link fails, then traffic should diverted to locations B and then to ISP-B (i.e through Switch-A-->Switch-B--->ISP-B).
Attached is the desired connectivity diagram.
Waiting for solution.

Similar Messages

How can I use Balancing, if I connected to two ISP?

Hello,
I have NetWare6sp3 with 3 NIC's and connected to two ISP. I set two default
gateways (One to first ISP, Another to second ISP). But all of trafic goes
via first gateway. Can I use Balancing beetween ISP1 and IPS2?
Maxim Cuznetov

Maxy,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at http://support.novell.com in both the "free product support" and "paid product support" drop down boxes.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

How to configure for two ISPs?

I have two ISPs, both on dialup. On my previous computer I had both showing in Internet Connect so it was simple to choose. Setting up the new one, I have set up two "Locations" but now I only see one at a time in Internet Connect. To change I have to use System Prefs to select the other at which point it will show up in Internet Connect.
Is there any information on how to set this up properly so that both ISPs appear in Internet Connect?
Pete

I can't give any information about setting it up in Internet Connect (it is no longer on 10.5, but I see you have 10.4), but with the two locations a far simpler (and faster) way to switch is to use the Location menu item in the Apple menu (top left of your screen).
I have my computer set up with four locations and switch as needed without ever touching the preferences panels.
With two locations Internet connect would only display the one relevant to the location you are using at any particular time.

NAT and Routed Network with Two ISP's on one router

I'm sure this has been done covered many times, but I am not finding it.
I have two ISP connections.
With ISP-A I have a /30 between us and 200.100.100.0/24 is routed to me via the /30 for thsi example we will say the /30 is 1.1.1.1 on isp end and 1.1.1.2 on my end
With ISP-B I have a 100.0.0.0/29 subnet. and the ISP gateway is on that subnet at 100.0.0.1
On the inside of my network I have devices using both 200.100.100.x addresses and devices on 192.168.100.x that need to use NAT.
I would like all of the devices on 200.100.100.x addresses to continue using ISP-A as their gateway.
Everything on 192.168.100.x should use NAT and go out ISP-B
I have tried
ip nat inside source route-map ISP-A interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
route-map ISP-B permit 10
match ip address 101
match interface GigabitEthernet0/1
set ip next-hop 100.0.0.1
route-map ISP-A permit 10
match ip address 111
match interface Multilink1
set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1
The problem comes when I have default routes to ISP-A in the router than none of the ISP-B traffic works, and vice versa.

I think for this to work correctly and be able to split traffic between the 2 ISPs, you would need to use BGP, because default is going to use one ISP or the other.
If you can use BGP, this link will help you in load shearing between multiple ISPs when you have one router.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#conf4
HTH

Question for the experts... Two ISP's, one home network

OK, I am about to give up on the EA2700... It has been a small nightmare that has cost me time and money.
A bit of background here... We live way off grid, so far that being wired to it is not going to happen in my lifetime. We generate our own power from our own small hydro-electric plant on our creek. We have two internet connections, (three if you include tethering to the phones) and have been manually switching between to two. They are Hughesnet satellite and a line-of-sight ISP.
Here is my question: What is the best router out there for joining the two ISP's?
We had a network guy up to our place last year and he used the "netsh" command in DOS on each computer in the network. It worked for a while but I have a feeling this may have been a contributing factor in the current troubles we're having with the EA2700. We have removed two of the older PC's that had these command lines and have added a new laptop and tower, both of which we attempted to replicate the netsh command on but without success... Yes, a noob at this stuff...
I'm in the city today and am wanting to purchase the right unit before I head back into the hinterland. Thanks!

If you are planning to join two ISP's, you need a dual WAN router. EA2700 can't handle that. You might want to check this RV042 from Cisco.
If everyone needs to believe in something, I believe I'll have another beer..

Two Asa Two Isp and Windows 2008 R2 Server

Hello Everybody ,
If you can support my issue , I do appreciate a lot.
First of all thanks a lot for your interest ..
Here is my issue :
I have two Isp Connection ( 1 metro Eth Connection and 1 Ghdsl Connection )
1) Asa 5505 (Version 8.0(5)) is for the 1.st Isp Connection
Windows 2008 R2 server is up and running as Web Server on this ASA 5505 config.
As:
(static (inside,outside) mywebsrv.mycompany.com 192.168.5.5 netmask 255.255.255.255
And Ipconfig of W2008Srv is 192.168.5.5 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.1 (Gateway ASA 5505)
2) Asa 5510 (Version 8.0(5)) is for the 2.nd Isp Connection
Windows 2003 R2 server is up and running as Ftp Server on this ASA 5510 config.
As:
(static (inside,outside) myftpsrv.mycompany.com 192.168.50.10 netmask 255.255.255.255
And Ipconfig of W2003Srv is 192.168.50.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.1 (Gateway ASA 5510)
Here is my question :
I need to move my Ftp server (due to old hardware + old server issues )
into the Windows 2008 R2 Server ( HP DL Server with 4 Nic).
If I conect my Asa 5510 to the second nic of Windows 2008 R2 Server.
and give an ip address as 192.168.50.10 255.255.255.0
what should be the gateway Ip address : ?
Before I go ahead and implement :
a) What do I need to do on the Windows 2008 R2 Server
as persistent route adds with different metrics
b) Any config adds or changes on Asa 5505 and ASA 5510 regarding static routes with
different metric and so on ...
Many thanks in advance for your support .

If you do that, the second interface will work as a failsafe for the first NIC.
As far as i know, you won't be able to route traffic based on the type of traffic nor do load-balancing between the interfaces.
I guess the best approach will be to get a newer server and use it as a replacement for the one running 2003 R2.

I have problem with a dynamic failover with two isps

Hello, I would like to help me with something.
I would like to do failover on my cisco router but the problem is that i have two isp but one of them is DSL. I meam that It learns gateway for dhcp and this is my main gateway.
I tried to do the same thing but I can´t put track in this command "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp.."
I also use "ip dhcp-client default-route 25" but It didn´t work..
could you help me ? please
I upload a file with configuration that i actually have it. In this file I don´t have any configuration about failover because i tried many option but i haven´t found any solution

I did this but on router didn´t change deafult route.
This is the configuration that i tried:
Current configuration : 9940 bytes
! Last configuration change at 22:10:41 UTC Fri Aug 29 2014 by Conssa
version 15.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname RT_Conssaccs
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c890-universalk9-mz.153-3.M2.bin
boot-end-marker
aqm-register-fnf
logging buffered 51200 warnings
enable secret 5 $1$RK//$OFh6Dnk96LlX1VFKQwsme.
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default enable
aaa authentication login consola local
aaa authentication login vty line
aaa authentication login userauthen local
aaa authorization network EZAUTHR local
aaa session-id common
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4275920401
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-4275920401
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4275920401
ip dhcp ping timeout 100
ip dhcp update dns
ip dhcp-client default-router distance 100
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO891-K9 sn FTX145104B5
object-group network conssaremoto
description vpnremoto
range
object-group network pruebasael
description vpnremoto
range
redundancy
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
no ip ftp passive
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 5
lifetime 180
crypto isakmp policy 20
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto isakmp key cisco address
crypto isakmp keepalive 10 4
crypto isakmp client configuration group conssa
key vpnbna
pool conssaVPN
acl 121
mode transport
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
set pfs group5
crypto ipsec profile EZPROFILE
set transform-set TSET
interface Tunnel0
description VPNConssaCCs
bandwidth 1000
ip address
ip mask-reply
ip mtu
ip nhrp authentication DMVPN_NW
ip nhrp map multicast
ip nhrp map
ip nhrp network-id 100000
ip nhrp holdtime 360
ip nhrp nhs
ip nhrp registration no-unique
ip nhrp registration timeout 30
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
delay 1000
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0
tunnel destination
tunnel key 100000
tunnel protection ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
interface FastEthernet2
switchport access vlan 2
no ip address
shutdown
interface FastEthernet3
no ip address
interface FastEthernet4
no ip address
interface FastEthernet5
no ip address
interface FastEthernet6
no ip address
interface FastEthernet7
no ip address
interface FastEthernet8
description $ETH-WAN$
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip unnumbered Vlan1
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec profile EZPROFILE
interface GigabitEthernet0
description $ETH-WAN$
ip dhcp client route track 1
ip ddns update hostname
ip ddns update noip
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
interface Vlan2
no ip address
shutdown
interface Async1
no ip address
encapsulation slip
ip local policy route-map prueba
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http client username conssa
ip nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.6.1 200
ip sla auto discovery
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 8.8.8.8 source-interface GigabitEthernet0
frequency 5
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
no logging trap
no cdp run
route-map prueba permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop dynamic dhcp
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 101 permit icmp any host 8.8.8.8 echo
sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 200.84.32.1 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [100/0] via 200.84.32.1
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks

GLBP and Two ISP's

Hello all, has any one used GLBP with two ISP's. I have been looking for an good example, I have not found one yet. If any one has dealt with this? I have not used GLBP before so just putting out the feelers.
Basically I have a remote site connected to two ISP's it's a MPLS WAN for both ISP's.
Remote sites have two routers one for each ISP connection.
Two data centers, each with a connection to both ISP's
The remote LAN side is a flat segment with no layer 3 switch (I know).
Let's say we are running eBGP with private AS numbers each ISP has a different one.

check out the following link for configuring GLBP, hope this helps :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008042fb97.html

Two ISP´s, can they work together ?

Hi people,
Thing is, I have two ISP´s in my LAN with diferent routers (two diferent gateways), then , I need to use the second one only like a backup, I typed a secondary ip route with a diferent weitgh in another internal router which is my default gateway but, it does not work fine.
I was trying with route-maps but I did not find how to apply them in that case.
If somebody can help me about that issue
will be very useful.
Any link, any idea please
Thanks in advanced
Martin

Yes you can do that.
You can use HSRP for this and then you don't need to put floating static route.
hope this help

Two ISP connection and 4 NIC

I have two ISP connections for Internet and the BM server has four
interfaces, two public interfaces with completely different IP addresses
and two private interfaces.
I want to connect two different Terminal Server one for each ISP
connection.
When I connect to the public side of the server, I can only connect
to the public IP address that is in the same subnet as the default route
uses.
Thank you

In article <HwTIi.1699$[email protected]>, Valentin wrote:
> When I connect to the public side of the server, I can only connect
> to the public IP address that is in the same subnet as the default route
> uses.
>
That is correct.
This one gets tricky, because of routing issues. If you know NAT, you
might be able to enable dynamic NAT on the private (LAN side) of one of the
internet routers. That will make all traffic coming in that way look like
it comes from a local address, and the second NIC will respond to it.
Otherwise, all traffic will end up going to the default route. You may
need filter exceptions to allow such traffic to go between public NIC's, if
it works at all.
If you just want to RCONJ to the second public NIC, you might be able to
configure static NAT of that address to itself, but the default route and
filters are still going to give you grief.
You might want to look at tip #51 at the URL below, for a system with 2
subnets on one public NIC.
It sounds to me like you need a dual-WAN router to handle the two ISP
connections. I've set up a number of servers that way using inexpensive
Xincom routers (www.xincom.com).
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

Slow browsing, got message you have two isp opening.

slow web browsing , a message informed me i had two isp trying to open? many thanks.

hi swarnava, got firefox7 but did not help.but many thanks. travisjr.

Two Ethernet-Two ISPs Possible?

Hello!
Please, once and for all, enlighten me. I cannot seem to find a clear answer.
I have two ISPs with ethernet connection. I wish to use/switch between them.
Is this even possible?
Is there a way to switch between them internally (no cable pulling)?
Thanks!

To disable an interface:
In Network system preference (click the padlock at lower-left to unlock if needed) select the desired interface in the left column, click the gear icon at the bottom, select "Make Service Inactive), then click Apply (lower-right).
Instead of manually switching them on and off, you can leave them both on and use "Set Service Order" with the gear icon. It will then use the first interface. If that stops, it should then use the next one.

Two isp load balancing on ACE(load balancer)

hi
I don't know much about load balancer(ACE).
Is this is possible to load balance two isp's on load balancer (ACE). If so, how i can do so , any configuration example, or cisco document.

Wrong forum, post in "Datacenter". You can move your posting with the Actions panel on the right.

Two isp load balancing on cisco ACE(load balancer)

I don't know much about load balancer(ACE).
Is this is possible to load balance two isp's on load balancer (ACE). If so, how i can do so , any configuration example, or cisco document.

Wrong forum, post in "Datacenter". You can move your posting with the Actions panel on the right.

Best Practice Two ISPs and BGP

Hello Experts.
I was wanting to hear opinions for the best way to setup two ISR4431's with two 2960x's and two ASA firewalls.
My current design is:
ISP1 router -> ISR4431-A ->{2960x pair} -> ASA-A
ISP2 router -> ISR4431-B ->{2960x pair} -> ASA-B
Currently using public BGP and HSRP on the inside with an SLA monitor to a public IP.
If HSRP is the best way to accomplish this, how do i solve these two problems or is there a better design? (The two 4431's are not connected to each other currently.)
-Least Cost routing (i guess that is what its called) - I want to visit a website that is located on ISP2's network (or close to it), but HSRP currently has ISP1 as active. If i go out ISP1 it may go around the country or 10 hops before it hit a site that is 4 hops away on the other ISP.
-Assymetric routing - i think that is where a reply comes in the non-active ISP - how do i prevent that.
I am really just looking for design advice about the best way to use this hardware to create as much redundancy as possible and best performance possible. If you could just share your opinion of "I would use ____" or give me a stamp of reassurance on the above design and any opinion on the two problems.
Thanks for the time!

Hi,
If you are running BGP with the service provides, you need an IBGP link between the 2 ISR-4431 routers. If for example you want traffic to go out using sp-1 and come back using the same provider you need to us AS path prepending, so sp-2 sees a longer path to your network and so traffic goes out and comes back through the same provider. In this case you use sp-2 as backup link, if not you can be dealing with Asymmetric routing. In addition, for HSRP/VRRP to work both routers should be connecting to the set of 2960x switches. You can simply stack the 2960x switches so they logically look as one device. The same should go for the firewalls. They should connect to the switch stack.
HTH

Two ISPs - A&B

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for