Two mappings in one scenario without bpm

Hi,
I am using two different mappings.
Output of one mapping is acting as an input for other mapping i.e source message for second mapping.
Is it possible to do this scenario without using bpm?

hi,
have a look how it works from my weblog:
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/01/xi-xml-node-into-a-string-with-graphical-mapping
you can use any mapping but you need to
be aware how to input and output structures look like:
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/weblogs/images/34500/1_xslt_pierwszy.JPG
BTW
target structure is only checked if you use
graphical mapping
if you use abap or java mappings your target structure
will not be checked (if it's valid) as it is with
graphical mapping 
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

Similar Messages

  • Error handling in File - XI - SOAP scenario without BPM

    Hello!
    We have a File -> XI -> SOAP scenario without BPM. The problem is that if the Web Service sends back an error XI tries to reprocess the same message again and again instead of taking the next one.
    We do not want set the retry interval to NULL because most error cases are temporary connection problems and then also those messages would not automatically be reprocessed any more.
    We also have to use BE instead of EO, otherwise the Web Service will not return a response. But we need the response to be sure that the processing was successful. The message volume in this scenario is quite high and we do not want to use BPM only for the error handling.
    I know that from SP19 some additional adapter modules are available for async - sync scenarios without BPM. I tried to configure it like described in File - RFC - File without a BPM - Possible from SP 19. but it did not solve the problem. Does anybody have any other ideas? Thanks.
    Regards, Tanja

    Hi Tanja,
    >>>The volume is 3000 messages/day on business days and 700 messages/day during weekends but the traffic will increase in the future
    I think, you should check that out. It is assumedly only 2 days work to build a scenario:
    IDoc -> BP
    BP <-> SOAP/HTTP
    BP -> IDoc (Acknowledgement)
    In the process you need a condition branch, where you decide success or not. You need 2 Interface Mappings for filling the ALEAUD.
    Just send 1000 IDocs to the Test-XI and look to performance monitoring at Runtime Workbench, to find out, how many message will be processed in one hour. Assumedly 3000 and more per day should be possible. The advantage would be to reduce number of systems (no file system) and messages (better monitoring) and using the standard (better maintenance).
    >>>So you are suggesting I should use HTTP adapter and then add the SOAP header manually in a mapping?
    Yes, build the SOAP envelop during the mapping. Most easy is to use XSL or, if your mapping is ready, an additionsal XSL. You can put the error into the Acknowledgement to see it in ERP transaction WE02.
    Filling of ALEAUD fields:
    E1ADHDR/MESTYP: original message type
    E1ADHDR/E1STATE/DOCNUM: original IDoc number
    E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATUS: 68 in case of error, 53 in case of success
    E1ADHDR/E1STATE/STATXT: Short description for R/3 user what has happend
    I ve done such a scenario several times. That works without any problems.
    Regards,
    Udo

  • SOAP to IDoc scenario without BPM

    Hi,
    I have 2 scenario's
    1) IDoc-SOAP - -response -- IDoc scenario -- (have found some links  to do it without BPM)
    2) SOAP -- RFC request -- RFC response -- e-mail (no links found)
    how can i achive both these scenario's without BPM. Currently i have these 2 scenarios in our 7.1 version with BPM. but our requirement is to migrate this scenario into 7.4 without BPM(No PO).
    please help us to achive this scenario without BPM.
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    thanks,
    Praveen

    Hi Kiran,
    Could you please let us know the exact requirement. How do you want to send the response back to IDOC?
    ASync - Sync Bridge with IDOC sender is not possible in PI 7.0.
    If It is something like IDOC --> SOAP --> IDOC , And If the SOAP request is small then you can use SOAP Lookup in IDOC to IDOC Scenario.
    In The mapping You can do a lookup and get the response from SOAP(Webservice) and map that to your Target IDOC.
    This is one possible way for you without BPM in PI7.0.
    Please let me know if you need more details about this.
    Thanks
    Jyothi A

  • Synch-asynch scenario without bpm's?

    Synch-asynch scenario without bpmu2019s can any one help me how to configure this scenario without bpms?

    hi ferocious,
    That is possible with standard functions and standard module beans.
    Possiable1:
    From pi 7.1 v ,  sap provided standard functions like RFC and jdbc of the conversion function group.
    Possiable2:
    sap provided Standard module beans those are RequestResopnceBean and OnewayResponceBean.
    thanks,
    bhavanisankar.

  • Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

    Hi,
    I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
    1. SOAP Sender channel
    2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
         Module used:      a. RequestOneWayBean
                   b. WaitResponseBean
         Correlation Settings:
                   a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
                   b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
                   c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
                   d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
    3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
         Module used:      a. NotifyResponseBean
         Correlation Settings:
                   a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
                   b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
    I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
    ISSUE:
    1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
         a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
         b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
    I am not sure why I am receiving the message that "  could not create acknowledgements"
    2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
         a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
              will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
         b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58';  detailed error description:
              com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
              found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
    Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
    1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
    2. Note: 1086303
    3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
    In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
    Please help.
    Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

    Hi,
    detailed error description:
    com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
    found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
    This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
    Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
    Regards,
    Swetha.

  • Multiple files, same structure into one message without BPM

    Hi,
    Is it possible to read multiple files (each with single row) as one message without BPM by some configuration in channel?
    For example:
    input files placed simultaneously in input folder:
    file1: a,b,c
    file2: f,g,h
    file3: k,l,m
    after adapter picks files, xml message:
    <Message_type>
        <RecordSet>
            <file>
                 <A>a</A>
                 <B>b</B>
                 <C>c</C>
            </file>
            <file>
                 <A>f</A>
                 <B>g</B>
                 <C>h</C>
            </file>
            <file>
                 <A>k</A>
                 <B>l</B>
                 <C>m</C>
            </file>
         </RecordSet>
    </Message_type>

    Bond,
    Yes Bond. You can read the pattern what you have given.
    First Read the whole line in the file as one record. Now take the substring or write udf in mapping. This entirely depends upon your requirement.
    Regards,
    ---Satish

  • Message Split -- File to Idoc Scenario  -  ( Without BPM )

    I have multiple records coming to XI in a File and I have to create Multiple Idocs to R/3.
    Due to Complexity of mapping I'm splitting Maaping step into 2 message Mappings.
    A-->B
    B-->C
    In the 2nd Mapping step  I'm doing message Split meaning for each Source record I'm creating multiple Idocs ( To be precise each record on the source becomes 4 idocs in the Target.
    2nd Mapping step is as follows
    Source 1..1
      Sourcerecord 0.. Unbounded
        field1  0..1
        field2  0..1
        filed3  0..1
    Target
    Message 1
        Idoc   1.. Unbounded
          Idoc Structure..
    Message 2
          Idoc   1.. Unbounded
    Message 3
          Idoc   1.. Unbounded
    Message 4
          Idoc   1.. Unbounded
    So based on some criteria each record of Source will be mapped to 4 Messages (  1 each under each Message )
    Is it possible to do this without BPM?. Iam sending all these Idocs to same R/3 System.
    Thanks for any help..RK

    Hi,
    See the blog
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change
    <i>Basicly we have 2 ways of handling such scenarios:
    - we can use a block step and send multiple IDOCs from our BPM
    - we can also do a little trick and send multiple IDOCs from the XI without a BPM
    The first approach is a standard XI approach. It involves the use of a BPM
    so the speed of this transfer many not be very good in case you'd like to send
    hundreds or thousands of IDOCs in just one call.
    The second approach uses a little trick that was mentioned several times
    on the XI Froum by a number of XI developers but is still not very clear to the XI newbies.
    It allows us to send multiple IDOCs without the use of a BPM. Most probably this will be your choice
    if you'd like to use such 1:N (IDOCs) scenarios effectively.</i>
    Please see the bwlow threads also..
    IDOC Splitting
    File To IDOC Thru XI
    Multi-Mappings in BPM (XI 3.0)
    Please let me know , your prob..is solcev or not..
    Regards
    Chilla..

  • How to send two different IDocs to SAP without BPM

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on jms to IDoc scneario,my requirement is to convert one JMS messge in to 2 IDocs(DELVRY,MATMAS) to ECC , i searched in SDN to achieve this requirement without BPM, i found one blog,but its saying its not possible to use multi mapping scenarios with out BPM in IDoc
    what is the best approch to achieve my requirement without BPM.
    Regards,
    James

    is it true that multi mapping not going to support IDoc scenarios??
    Yes it is true that IDOC does not support multi-mapping....this can be proved if you look into the help section which shows the list of adapters supporting multimapping....IDOC is missing from that list....do not get confused between Idoc Multimapping and IDOC Bundling.....IDOC bundling means bundling IDOCs of same type...however you are looking for IDOCs of different types.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without BPM steps????

    Hi
    Could you please give me the solution for this ???
    I want steps for sending all IDOCs at a time- ---"Multiple IDOC to Multiple IDOC scenario without using BPM".???
    thanks
    3nadh

    Hello,
    Refer the below, for certain details!
    /people/swaroopa.vishwanath/blog/2007/01/22/ale-configuration-for-pushing-idocs-from-sap-to-xi     ALE configuration for pushing idocs from SAP to XI
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/12/04/xi-idoc-bundling--the-trick-with-the-occurance-change     XI: IDOC bundling - the "trick" with the occurance change
    Regards,
    Jilan

  • IDOC to WS Synchronous Scenario Without BPM

    Hi Experts,
    I am dealing with Idoc to WS synchronous scenario. Can this be done without BPM??
    ALEAUD can make IDOC to handle WS response??
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Sushama

    Please suggest since BPM involves performance issue
    BPM surely has performance issue...only when there are a lot of steps/ logic implemented in it and when the processing load is too much for the XI/ PI server to handle.
    The BPM design in your case will be just of following steps: Receive --> SyncSend --> AsyncSend .... excluding Transformation...and a BPM with these steps wont cause a big harm to processing of other messages.
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Mergeing files of same structure to one file without BPM

    Hi XI Gurus,
                    I want to merge various xml files having same structures(coming as separate files in source directory) to a one file. I want to do it without using BPM.I need this Final structure as an  input to another scenario to post an idoc.
    e.g -->
    <i>File1</i>:
    <AR_Posting>
         <currency_line_item>1<currency_line_item>
         <tax_line_item>2<tax_line_item>
          <customer_line_item>3<customer_line_item>
    <AR_Posting>
    <i>File 2</i>:
    <AR_Posting>
         <currency_line_item>11<currency_line_item>
         <tax_line_item>22<tax_line_item>
          <customer_line_item>33<customer_line_item>
    <AR_Posting>
    <i>File 3</i> :
    <AR_Posting>
         <currency_line_item>111<currency_line_item>
         <tax_line_item>222<tax_line_item>
          <customer_line_item>333<customer_line_item>
    <AR_Posting>
    Target:
    <Recordset>
          <AR_Posting>
             <currency_line_item>1<currency_line_item>
             <tax_line_item>2<tax_line_item>
             <customer_line_item>3<customer_line_item>
         <AR_Posting>
           <AR_Posting>
               <currency_line_item>11<currency_line_item>
               <tax_line_item>22<tax_line_item>
               <customer_line_item>33<customer_line_item>
          <AR_Posting>
          <AR_Posting>
              <currency_line_item>111<currency_line_item>
              <tax_line_item>222<tax_line_item>
              <customer_line_item>333<customer_line_item>
         <AR_Posting>
    <Recordset>
    Please suggest any solution to achieve this.

    Hi Anurag,,
    I guess what Sumit is aiming for, is that if you don't want to use a BPM you will need a two step solution.
    Step one:
    If the different files have the same structure, read them with a sending file adapter and route the to an receiving file adapter which appends all messages to a new combined file.
    Step two:
    Read the new combined file with a sending file adapter and route the messages to your target interface.
    This approach of-course means that you can not do any correlations as you can in BPM. I.e. you will not "know" when all three files have arrived but just simply read the combined files at certain times and pick-up whatever content it holds.
    rgds Johan

  • Append two message into one message in BPM

    hi,
    i have to receive two different outbound message interface in fork step. as soon as two message received
    i have to append those message to one message as below;
    A message
    1001 AAAA  BBBB CCCCC
    1002 DDDD  BBBB DDDDD
    B message
    1003 CCCC  1321 12213
    1004 DAFD  DDDD DDDDD
    1005 EDDD  DDDD DDDDD
    target message for C
    1001 AAAA  BBBB CCCCC
    1002 DDDD  BBBB DDDDD
    1003 CCCC  1321 12213
    1004 DAFD  DDDD DDDDD
    1005 EDDD  DDDD DDDDD
    and then i have to send C
    is it possible on BPM? i think not mapping issue and correlation.
    how can i append two abstract message to one abstract message?
    thanks
    venjamin

    hi all,
    BpmPatternCollectMessageToBeCollected in basis in ir is not multi-row,  this message type structure is just for individual message..
    in my case, source message type can be received multi record in row in once.
    so, what i want to say is interface mapping regarding
    appending two abs message into one inbound message for transformation.
    if it is possible, we may not need to container operation step because we already have bundled message in target abstract message. we can just send target abstract message.
    if it is not possible, how do you map to use in transformation step? and configure container operation?
    container operation should be appened from one structure message into one multi message.
    does it make sense?
    thanks
    venjamin

  • Two Alerts for one scenario: Application Error and No mapping found

    Hello,
    we have a synchronous scenario here embedded in an BPM.
    The last send step step is sync. The receiver is a web service (SOAP adapter) which sends back a response.
    Problem with the response from the service:
    First test: error entries in SXMB_MONI and in RWB
    RWB only shows message "No mapping found".
    SXMB_MONI shows more:
    1 entry for send step (status: log version)
    1 entry for APPLICATION ERROR for response
    1 entry for NO_MAPPING_PROGRAMM_FOUND for response
    APPLICATION ERROR:
    We have changed to trace level 3 now and there are some messages:
    level 3 message type T: Unknown channel type: SOAP
    Don´t know if this matters, because the channel is the sender channel.
    NO_MAPPING_PROGRAMM_FOUND:
    We have checked the whole implementation.
    It is completed w/o anything missing. the required mapping is available.
    No left change list entries to be activated.
    Error text:
    The Interface-Mapping http://xxx.com/xi/global GetDocIDsReq_nach_GetDocIDsResp is not available in runtime cache
    We made more than one full cache refresh but w/o any effect.
    We checked: There are no locks left!
    Does anybody here have experience with this problem or has more ideas what to do?
    Best regards
    Dirk
    Message was edited by:
            Dirk Meinhard

    Hello Dirk,
    We figured out that if you change your message mapping you also have to refresh and save your Interface Mapping.
    To ensure that your messages are equal with your Interfaces and the Message Types you should test the Interface Mapping by using integration Builder.
    If this works you have to check your BPM.
    By using BPM we figured out that if there is a fault in a BPM version the engine will not use this new version.
    To figure out which BPM version is used you have to open the
    Process Monitor à select the process and display the graphic à navigate to EXTRAS and select Workflow Builder. There you will see which BPM is really used. Maybe this is an old one.
    Hope this will show you where the problem is.
    Daniel

  • Doubt on Syn/Asyn Bridge scenario without BPM

    I followed the how to guide “How To Realize a sync-async and async-sync bridge within the Adapter Framework”,but issue still exists.
    It’s a File(QoS:BE)<=>Idoc scenario
    1 File adapter sends a sync booking request to idoc(MSG type: FLIGHTBOOKING_CREATEANDRESP)
    2 The idoc creates a booking in its system and then sends a async confirmation response(MSG type:
    FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE) to the sender(sync file adapter)
    In ID, there are 2 receiver determinations and 2 IF determinations for the request and the response.
    <b>Sender business system: NWB_FileSystem_XML</b>
      Sender CC: Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML
        Parameters Tab
    Qos:BE
    Poll Interval(secs) : 60
    Processing Mode: Delete  (Successfully processed files are deleted)
    Adapter-Specific Message Attributes: Select “File name”
    Module Tab
      Processing Sequence
        AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean      0
        AF_Modules/RequestOnewayBean            1
        CallSapAdapter                            2
        AF_Modules/WaitResponseBean              3
      Module Configuration
        0     key.0            write http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName
        0     value.0          message.correlationId
        1     passThrough     true
        3     timeout          40000
      Receiver CC: Dummy_ReceiverChannel_FileXML
        Parameters Tab
          Adapter-Specific Message Attributes: Select “File name”
    Module Tab
      Processing Sequence
        AF_Modules/DynamicConfigurationBean      0
            AF_Modules/NotifyResponseBean             1
      Module Configuration
        0     key.0            read http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File FileName
        0     value.0          message.correlationId
        1     timeout          40000
    <b>Receiver business system: nwb_107</b>
      Receiver CC: GeneratedReceiverChannel_Idoc
    <b>Agreements</b>
    Sender Agreement for NWB_FileSystem_XML uses CC: Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML
    Receiver Agreement for NWB_FileSystem_XML uses CC: GeneratedReceiverChannel_Idoc
    Receiver Agreement for nwb_107 uses CC: Dummy_ReceiverChannel_FileXML
    The problems is:
    The scenario only executes once and there are 2 XML messages in SXI_MONITOR with status “Processed successfully”.One of the message from idoc to file has the Acknowledgement MSG status “still awaiting acknowledgement”
    In the runtime workbench,the status of CC:Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML is correctly configured and started.The latest Processing Details of Syn_SenderChannel_FileXML is “3/13/07 9:13:12 PM Processing started”
    Regards
    Ming

    The trace of the message from IDOC to File in SXI_MONITOR:
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Response
      -->
    - <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_INBOUND_XMB" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">User: PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Language: E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">ALE-AUDIT-IDoc-Inbound Handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Inbound-Handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Syntax-Check-Flag X</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Tunnel-Flag</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queueid</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_IDOC_TO_XML">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get the Metadata for port SAPNWB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Convert Segment-Definitions to Types</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Make Syntax check of actual Idoc</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Set Receiver Routing-object</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Exit Function IDX_INBOUND_XMB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is expected by application !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = DBD16497D8475CF186920017314ECFFB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0007</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0007</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">--start sender interface action determination</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">select interface FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE.FLIGHTBOOKING_SENDRESPONSE01*</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">select interface namespace urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">no interface found</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0001</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:12Z UTC+8</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Interface Mapping http://sap.com/xi/XI/Demo/Agency FBOConfirmation_AirlineIDoc2Agency</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_IE_ADAPTER-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_XMB-CALL_XMS_HTTP" />
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async processing completed OK.</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = NWB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAPPLUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-03-13T13:13:13Z UTC+8</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      </SAP:Trace>

  • How to capture SOAPFault in an Async/Sync Scenario without BPM

    Hello friends,
    My scenario is ECC (async) to SOAP (sync) and back to ECC (async = ALEAUD). I'm using aync/sync bridge is receiver SOAP adapter.
    My scenario works fine with a normal response but when I get a SOAPFault as a response I get the following error in de receiver SOAP adapter:
    Message processing failed. Cause:
    com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.ConfigException: No sender agreement configured that matches the message's header fields (sender party: "", sender service: "NONSAP", interface: "urn:test,  SII_Test_Sync", receiver party: "", receiver service: "BS_ECC")
    The configuration of my receiver SOAP adapter looks like this:
    Did I use parameters interfaceOnFault and interfaceNamespaceOnFault correctly?
    Your help is greatly appreciated,
    Kind regards,
    John

    Hi Nilesh,
    sorry for the delay. What I found every time i used the option "DO NOT use SOAP envelope is checked" is that the envelope is removed from request and response/fault messages as well. To solve those kind of errors I developed a module called ReplaceString. What this module does is to replace a string with another one passed as parameter. What do I archive with this? Well I sometimes use this module to include some parts in the xml message before it gets in PI. For example, lets say you receive something like this:
    <FaultMessage>
    <standard>
         <faultText>
         <faultUrl>
         <faultDetail>
              <severity>High</severity>
              <text>This is an error</text>
              <url></url>
              <id></id>
         </faultDetail>
    </standard>
    </FaultMessage>
    and you are expecting something like this:
    <soap:Envelope
    xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope"
    soap:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding">
    <FaultMessage>
    <standard>
         <faultText>
         <faultUrl>
         <faultDetail>
              <severity>High</severity>
              <text>This is an error</text>
              <url></url>
              <id></id>
         </faultDetail>
    </standard>
    </FaultMessage>
    </soap:Envelope>
    You could use this module to replace the following strings:
    <FaultMessage>
    by
    <soap:Envelope
    xmlns:soap="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-envelope"
    soap:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-encoding"><FaultMessage>
    And
    </FaultMessage>
    by
    </FaultMessage></soap:Envelope>
    If you find it useful, I can paste the code of the module here.
    Regards!

Maybe you are looking for

  • My i phone wont let me take any more photo

    every time i try to take a new pic on my  phone 4s when i press to take the pic its coming stright back to my main screen anyone know what i can do

  • Twin Frozr III fan sticker?

          I have video card with Twin Frozr III cooling system and I have problem one fan is not working correctly and I think to put some oil in it (that helped in previous MSI cards) but problem is fan on Twin Frozr III is without sticker they have pla

  • NIC Teaming/Bonding with multiple switches.

    Today I started setting up in my lab a network with redundant Cisco 2970 switches. The hosts are two HP DL145 servers with two broadcom GBe NICs. The systems are running Linux 2.6.15.1 and I have enabled bonding in the kernel as a module. Each NIC is

  • Emails not getting trigerrred in access request- request type = user creation

    Hi , Can any one help me with solution why emails are not getting triggered in request->request type = user creation. I.e the L1 manager is not getting email when request is submitted. The checked SU01 regarding WF_BATCH email(email is maintained) an

  • Need to enable wifi sync without cable

    I am unable to connect my iPod to a computer and therefore need to enable the wifi sync without connecting it. Is this possible? If so, how do I do it?