Two New Beta Labs Releases S60v5

As title suggests, there are two new software releases from beta labs, a new release for Nokia bots
http://betalabs.nokia.com/apps/nokia-bots/download_and_installation
And a new app for Video collection management and access, looks interesting
http://betalabs.nokia.com/apps/nokia-video-cuts
I find most Beta labs releases quite useful and at least worth giving a try
If I have helped at all, a click on the White Star is always appreciated :
you can also help others by marking 'accept as solution'

Lol I have about 45 videos on my phone including 3 full length movies, it loaded 29 then stopped, so when I open it again it tries to load the others then crashes after about a second, if I select no, the viseos that are there work really well, think the app will be good if it gets beyond experimental. Also finding the Nokia Bots app vastly improved and more useable
If I have helped at all, a click on the White Star is always appreciated :
you can also help others by marking 'accept as solution'

Similar Messages

Registration probem on two new installs - Latest release Solaris 10

When trying to register these machines it just hangs after entering my Oracle login and password. Running update manager from the shell and see this :
Jan 27, 2011 4:48:09 PM ClientCommunicatorAdmin restart
WARNING: Failed to restart: java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: 10.16.99.1; nested exception is:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
Jan 27, 2011 4:48:09 PM RMIConnector RMIClientCommunicatorAdmin-doStop
WARNING: Failed to call the method close():java.rmi.ConnectException: Connection refused to host: 10.16.99.1; nested exception is:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
Jan 27, 2011 4:48:09 PM ClientCommunicatorAdmin Checker-run
WARNING: Failed to check connection: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused
Jan 27, 2011 4:48:09 PM ClientCommunicatorAdmin Checker-run
WARNING: stopping
Why is it trying to ping itself??

-- Minor update,
I was able to update the system with the PCA script. 128 patches!
After the update I still cant register these guys though? support.oracle.com shows the CSI numbers.
Suppose I can submit an SR but thought I'd try here first.
Thanks

Couldn't uninstall Adobe Flash Player 32 bit from 64 bit OS or install new beta release 14 from Adobe Labs.

Adobe Flash Player 32 bit is integrated with Internet Explorer of Windows 8 could not be uninstalled howsoever for Adobe Labs new beta release, how to install 64 bit Adobe Flash Player ActiveX?
Message from www.adobe.com:
Snip from webpage of Adobe Labs:

Hi,
Did you encounter any error messages about this issue? Please paste it here so we can know what happened, and from the Adobe Labs webpage,
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html
I find that
So the product remains test, it doesn't have a enough stability, you might contact the Adobe Support for detailed information.
Regarding to uninstall the player, have you tried instruction in the following links?
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/uninstall-flash-player-windows.html
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/928315
NOTE
This response contains a reference
to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you.
Microsoft does not control these sites and has not tested
any software or information found on these sites.
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

Bought two new phones from Verizon and can't activate either - does sprint or AT&T have better customer service?

HELP!!! I bought two new phones from Verizon stores for Christmas presents and can't activate either one. When I try to go on-line I get a message that the activations can't be processed.
When I try to call, I get a message that they have Activation support for today but long hold times (understandable) and the automated system keeps hanging up on me (not understandable).
Any hints on how to talk to someone and get these working today?

massive frustration that the phone process kept hanging up on me. finally got to chat with a customer service person (not sure how because I could never find a chat option on-line). Kari was GREAT; stayed with me and fixed what ever needed to be fixed.

Two new SCs in the same track - with dependencies

Hello Guys,
We are going to create an NWDI track with two new Software Components.
1. SC for Services (let us call it SC-A)
2. SC for UI Content (let us call it SC-B)
These are going to be brand new SCs created in SLD and imported into one NWDI track for starting the development.
SC-B is going to be dependent on SC-A.
(SC-B will use various services provided by SC-A which will be made available via public parts).
I will create the SCs in SLD and define the necessary dependencies accordingly (between SC-B and SC-A).
I will then create the track with the above two SCs as developed Software Components.
Initially at the check in stage, I will not have any sources (SCA files) for the above two software components itself (since
they are brand new - without any code yet). However, I will checkin the other required SCAs (JEE, JBUILDT, JTECHS, .. ).
My concerns / questions are:
1. Can we do the development on both the software components in parallel?
2. Let us say, I created a DC with name DC-A in SC-A (via a NWDS activity) and after checking that activity in and activating my changes,
I created another DC with name DC-B in SC-B which uses DC-A from SC-A, would this be a problem?
3. In question 2 above, do I have to take care of the dependencies in a different way ?
(when compared to having both the used DC and USing DC in the same SC)
4. Can I add more SCs into the same track (which will probably use both SC-A and SC-B) in the future ?
I believe that this is going to be just fine but I am a little confused around the initial "check-in" of the requires SCAs into the track.
Also, we are going to spend a lot of time in the development system itself and it would be nice to work in parallel on both the SCs.
(The assembly of the above said SCs is only going to happen after a few months of development effort).
I also understand that we can have the two SCs in separate tracks but we really want them in the same track and be able to work on them in parallel.
Please throw some light in this area ...
Thanks for taking time to read ...
Thanks,
Kalyan

Hi Kalyan,
To your questions:
1. Yes.
2. No, make sure to sync you used DC's on DC-B.
3. No, this is a legitimate SC-DC architecture.
4. Yes, but for "future" projects you probably want to use new tracks.
You should check-in the required SCA's AND import them in development.
You can work parallel on both SC's.
You better use one track as assembly/deployment will be on the same date, otherwise you need track connections (either a repair, which needs a NWDS-release of perhaps not tested functionality, or a transport, which needs a complete & approved SC-A, is it?).
Let me just say: I have the same architecture and it works fine for me.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Alain

New Spry Widgets Released

Hi All,
I know that we have been remiss in keeping up with our
ambitious release schedule.
As I mentioned earlier, we were shooting for a full new
release this month but didn't have the time.
Well, we decided to do a 'light launch' for our new Spry
widgets.
We have posted our new Spry widgets and 2 new beta docs here:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/samples/preview.html
As you can see we have:
- Menu Bar
-Collapsible Panel
-Tabbed Panel
- Form Text Field
- Form Text Area
- Form Select
- Form Checkbox
- Tabbed Panel doc
- Collapsible Panel doc
As I say there, we are releasing these in this manner because
they are mostly done, but we don't have complete docs for
everything. Once we have full docs and some updates for data, we
will make a new zip and release Spry 1.4.
For now, you can check out these samples and play around with
them.
Let us know what you think.
We also added a new demo here:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/demos/formsvalidation/
Hope you like the new stuff.
Thanks,
The Adobe Spry Team

Hi John,
So the thinking on that is this:
They are widgets because they are pieces of markup that
encapsulate advanced functionality. The actual validation is the
major part of the funtionality, but the actual widget is the span
tag container, the input itself, and then additional markup for the
messages. Basic mark-up, style with CSS and a constructor
script=Spry Widget.
As for structure, the 'widgets' folder is where we keep the
latest versions of the real thing. All required widgets resources,
like CSS and JS, plus the basic example file, go in the 'widgets'
folder.
The 'samples' directory is where we put samples that explain
or add onto the basic widget. This is more of a playing around
area.
But we reference the dependent files in the 'widgets'
directory so that we only need to have one copy of the files on the
site and in the zip. This helps ensure that every sample is working
off the same files.
But for you guys, it makes it a pain to get all the required
source files, I know. I was thinking of zipping the new samples and
putting them up so it's easier to download the new stuff.
Make sense?
Thanks,
Don

OVI Suite - New Beta version 3.1.0.47 available at...

OVI Suite - New Beta version 3.1.0.47 available at Beta Labs... Downloaded.. being Installed now..

Is it still trying to copy iTunes by "recommending" music and apps?
If so, I will stick with PC Suite.
Nokia, please can you release a grown ups version of Ovisuite for business users?
If I wanted an iPhone, I would have bought one. Please stop trying to copy iPhone!!

Two new iPhones 1 promotional gb for 24 mos finally added. I have to jump hoops next year for the second gb (also 24 mos) owed to me.

Here's the update.
SO they finally added the extra gb for 24 mos on only one of two new iPhones that I bought in September. Count the months, it's been three months.
WHy is my issue only half resolved and they said it's going to stay that way?
BEcause they said that, yes they have documentation from the rep that activated the first phone that it was her fault. She did it in the incorrect order for the promo to work. She was supposed to make sure that the right plan was on the acct before activating the phone. She tried to correct it that same day but she didn't have a way to do it so she advised me to wait for the delivery of my husbands phone (the second phone) and once I receive it, at that time I should try to correct her mistake.
I Knew it was fishy and right away I consulted with a manager at the local store where I had first heard of the promotion. He tried to help me for two months and came back empty handed because as he put it he has even less access compared to the reps in customer service. Eventually I gave him a break and also because promised calls from supervisors were not kept. So I called customer service myself and after one knowlegeable rep and one sympathetic supervisor the end result is a problem half resolved.. A second supervisor after that is the one that explained to me that they have no way of fixing the reps mistake and he suggested that I accept 1gb for a year instead of 2 years and that then I should call back once that expires and ask for it to be added back for a second year.
I Said No. I will not go through this again, it's not fair to me. I said to him its been three months now since I started trying to get this resolved I'm not going to repeat that stress again next year.   As it is it never fails every two Years when I add on a new promotional phone, there's always some mess that I have to spend months clearing up.
SO dissapointed. I told him I was going to give him a bit more time to make things right but I'm beginning to believe it's so hard for them that they prefer not to bother and instead try to fix it best they can within their department. Unfortunately it adds to my inconvenience. So I think im going to have to put a complaint with the public utility commission and the better business bureau.

Here's the update.
SO they finally added the extra gb for 24 mos on only one of two new iPhones that I bought in September. Count the months, it's been three months.
WHy is my issue only half resolved and they said it's going to stay that way?
BEcause they said that, yes they have documentation from the rep that activated the first phone that it was her fault. She did it in the incorrect order for the promo to work. She was supposed to make sure that the right plan was on the acct before activating the phone. She tried to correct it that same day but she didn't have a way to do it so she advised me to wait for the delivery of my husbands phone (the second phone) and once I receive it, at that time I should try to correct her mistake.
I Knew it was fishy and right away I consulted with a manager at the local store where I had first heard of the promotion. He tried to help me for two months and came back empty handed because as he put it he has even less access compared to the reps in customer service. Eventually I gave him a break and also because promised calls from supervisors were not kept. So I called customer service myself and after one knowlegeable rep and one sympathetic supervisor the end result is a problem half resolved.. A second supervisor after that is the one that explained to me that they have no way of fixing the reps mistake and he suggested that I accept 1gb for a year instead of 2 years and that then I should call back once that expires and ask for it to be added back for a second year.
I Said No. I will not go through this again, it's not fair to me. I said to him its been three months now since I started trying to get this resolved I'm not going to repeat that stress again next year.   As it is it never fails every two Years when I add on a new promotional phone, there's always some mess that I have to spend months clearing up.
SO dissapointed. I told him I was going to give him a bit more time to make things right but I'm beginning to believe it's so hard for them that they prefer not to bother and instead try to fix it best they can within their department. Unfortunately it adds to my inconvenience. So I think im going to have to put a complaint with the public utility commission and the better business bureau.

Can I get rid of Exchange with the new Server just released?

Hi, I saw the new 8 core machine and all the programs. I also recieved an email from Apple telling me about all the calendaring it has.
I want to get rid of Exchange. I have Outlook on 99.9% the clients, however, and they're not going to get rid of Windows or Office any time soon. Will the new server just released and the server software do Exchange server calendaring, scheduling, etc. just like (or better) than Exchange does?
Thanks.

iCalServer uses the new standard CalDAV protocol for calendaring. Exchange uses MS's own proprietary protocols - we do not have those implemented in iCalServer. As a result your existing Outlook users can't use iCalServer right now.
The good news is that there is at least one group working on a plugin for Outlook that will enable access to iCalServer. Whilst this is still alpha quality right now progress is being made, and hopefully in the near future thee will be something usable. See <http://openconnector.org>.

I keep receiving a server error message with the new beta version of iMessage. What can I do to fix this?

I keep receiving a server error message with the new beta version of iMessage. What can I do to fix this?

Ok I have a question.
Why do you want to use Beta software? Especially since you are having this problem with it?
Uninstall it and forget about it until it is released as a real piece of software.

New ACR RC released... Looking forward to seeing new features in LR

Adobe just announced ACR 8.5 RC: Camera Raw 8.5 RC and DNG Converter 8.5 RC Now Available
Some very useful new features are included along with the usual support for new camera models, such as the ability to modify gradients with a new brush tool and being able to display a mask overlay for gradients... Nice! Looking forward to seeing LR 5.5 (or perhaps even 6?). No news on a release candidate for LR; perhaps there won't be one as per 5.4.
M

I note this paragraph heading in the notes for the release's new features:
"Camera Raw 8.5 introduces the following new features for Photoshop CC customers"
Could this mean that although the Beta update is stated to be for both CS6 and CC that the new features (outside the camera additions) would not be implemented with a CS6 install?

Beta Refresh Release Now Available! Sun Cluster 3.2 Beta Program

The Sun Cluster 3.2 Release team is pleased to announce a Beta Refresh release. This release is based on our latest and greatest build of Sun Cluster 3.2, build 70, which is close to the final Revenue Release build of the product.
To apply for the Sun Cluster 3.2 Beta program, please visit:
https://feedbackprograms.sun.com/callout/default.html?callid=%7B11B4E37C-D608-433B-AF69-07F6CD714AA1%7D
or contact Eric Redmond <[email protected]>.
New Features in Sun Cluster 3.2
Ease of use
* New Sun Cluster Object Oriented Command Set
* Oracle RAC 10g improved integration and administration
* Agent configuration wizards
* Resources monitoring suspend
* Flexible private interconnect IP address scheme
Availability
* Extended flexibility for fencing protocol
* Disk path failure handling
* Quorum Server
* Cluster support for SMF services
Flexibility
* Solaris Container expanded support
* HA ZFS
* HDS TrueCopy campus cluster
* Veritas Flashsnap Fast Mirror Resynchronization 4.1 and 5.0 option support
* Multi-terabyte disk and EFI label support
* Veritas Volume Replicator 5.0 support
* Veritas Volume Manager 4.1 support on x86 platform
* Veritas Storage Foundation 5.0 File System and Volume Manager
OAMP
* Live upgrade
* Dual partition software swap (aka quantum leap)
* Optional GUI installation
* SNMP event MIB
* Command logging
* Workload system resource monitoring
Note: Veritas 5.0 features are not supported with SC 3.2 Beta.
Sun Cluster 3.2 beta supports the following Data Services
* Apache (shipped with the Solaris OS)
* DNS
* NFS V3
* Java Enterprise System 2005Q4: Application Server, Web Server, Message Queue, HADB

Without speculating on the release date of Sun Cluster 3.x or even its feature list, I would like to understand what risk Sun would take when Sun Cluster would support ZFS as a failover filesystem? Once ZFS is part of Solaris 10, I am sure customers will want to use it in clustered environments.
BTW: this means that even Veritas will have to do something about ZFS!!!
If VCS is a much better option, it would be interesting to understand what features are missing from Sun Cluster to make it really competitive.
Thanks
Hartmut

Add two new field in s_alr_87012936?

Hi Experts,
I want to add two new field in the report of T-code S_alr_87012936. I have copied that report into a Zreport.
Can anyone reply how to add two new field in the selection screen. As the program uses logical database ADA.
Have I to create a z logical database or simply add selection-screen and fetch data? Which option is better?

Hi,
You can create the report category and add those fields, if that fields are available in LDB. Or you can create your own selection screen with those fields and used in the report iin report selection screen you will get LDB selection screen as well your selection screen.

NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series Has Two New Articles!

The NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series consists of documents covering topics of interest to advanced NI TestStand developers. The series' authors are NI TestStand architects and developers who provide insightful content that goes beyond basic documentation by offering best practices for large and complex projects. The series will release new documents quarterly so check back to see what's new in a few months!
The NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series has two new documents offering best practices for large and complex projects.
Best Practices for Improving NI TestStand System Performance discusses best practices for optimizing the performance of test stations developed with National Instruments TestStand software.
Best Practices for NI TestStand User Interface Development explains the best practices to design and develop your TestStand User Interface.
Both articles can be found in the NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series.
Josh W.
Certified TestStand Architect
Formerly blue

I like the download price!
I've shared this doc with some friends already, thanks for the good work!
Now is the right time to use %^<%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%3uZ>T
If you don't hate time zones, you're not a real programmer.
"You are what you don't automate"
Inplaceness is synonymous with insidiousness

Two New Free Articles in the NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series!

The NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series consists of documents covering topics of interest to advanced NI TestStand developers. The series' authors are NI TestStand architects and developers who provide insightful content that goes beyond basic documentation by offering best practices for large and complex projects. The series will release new documents quarterly so check back to see what's new in a few months!
The NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series has two new documents offering best practices for large and complex projects.
Best Practices for NI TestStand Process Model Development and Customization discusses concerns and best practices when customizing TestStand process models.
NI TestStand Validation and Verification Best Practices explains best practices to design and develop your TestStand system for ease of Verification and Validation.
Both articles can be found in the NI TestStand Advanced Architecture Series.
Message Edited by Josh W. on 10-02-2008 09:40 AM
Message Edited by Josh W. on 10-02-2008 09:40 AM
Josh W.
Certified TestStand Architect
Formerly blue

Excellent article. Well executed RayF.
And thanks for sharing your valuable knowledge.
RayR

Two New Beta Labs Releases S60v5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for