Two SRM system in the same Portal

Dear Guru,
we need your support for the following question.
I'm working with SRM 7 and ECC in a extended classic scenario. SRM is available thorugh the portal. For training activity we need to have another copy of SRM and ECC system. It is possible to connect in the same time two SRM system in the unique portal?
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards
Giuseppe

Hello Giuseppe,
       As per the standard , there is no possibility to work on twins SRM system at the same time on Portal. And as Ivy Li mentioned  that all SRM IViews have system alias as SAP_SRM which points to 1 system at a time  . Now as per your saying twins  SRM system with unique portal which will also create a problem as most of the time the portal navigation would be locked.Now again while uploading the WDA package for SRM portal your data's might get effect if you are showing your actual data in your training session. If you find then there could be many reasons.
Regards
Gaurav Gautam

Similar Messages

  • Two SAP systems in the same host "no files processing"

    Hello!
    I have two SAP Systems installed on the same host.
    If I execute redo logs archiving from DB13 I get the error "no files processing", because of I already executed redo logs for the other SAP system on the same host.
    <b>How can I set up this issue?</b>
    Thank you very much
    regards
    Thank you very much
    regards

    Hello!
    I have two SAP Systems installed on the same host.
    If I execute redo logs archiving from DB13 I get the error "no files processing", because of I already executed redo logs for the other SAP system on the same host.
    <b>How can I set up this issue?</b>
    Thank you very much
    regards
    Thank you very much
    regards

  • Two applications systems with the same DB

    Hi,
    is it possible to have two Oracle applications systems on the same DB ? I mean for exemple two e-business suites (Oracle applications) each one with a different instance of the same database ( DB version 9i and OA version 11.5.9).
    Many thanks before.

    Not possible,certified or supported,anyways you cannot have two SIDs for the same DB can you?
    Sam
    http://www.appsdbablog.com

  • SLD: Pointing two business systems to the same client...

    Hi Guys,
       Is there anyway to make two business systems point to the same client(on the same r/3 technical system)? how about a work around?
    Thanks,
    Harsh

    Harsh,
    >><i>Finally all collapse to one client in production.</i>
    Even though you will have multiple Business Systems in every envrionment, the final transport will happen from only one environment.
    DEV --> QA --> PROD. In this case, objects are moved from dev to qa and then from QA to prod and so, all you will need is the trasnport target created in the QA business systems pointing to the Prod busines system and do the transport.
    ><i>While transporting to a new SLD(quality to prod) can I choose one transport target for multiple source business systems?</i>
    Take a look at this document for multiple SLD transports. Should answer all doubts,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e76e511-0d01-0010-5c9d-9f768d644808
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Two editors on two edit systems sharing the same footage, suggestions?

    So I just got done shooting my first feature and now I've got to come up with a plan for editing.
    Here's what I got:
    1 Core 2 Duo iMac with FW800 FCS2
    1 Core Duo iMac with FW400 FCS2
    ~40hrs of DV25 footage
    $800 dollars to spend on a storage solution
    The Core 2 Duo iMac will be the primary system for the final edits, color correction, ect. and the other iMac will be used for rough cuts, capturing a/v, exporting, etc.
    For the most part only one system will be editing at once, but I'd like both systems to have simultaneous access to the footage for the days when we need to hustle.
    Originally my plan was to get a 1TB G-RAID2 (or something similar) and run firewire to both systems but from what I've heard, that's a bad idea. Maybe I could link it to one computer and have one system edit over a network?
    I'm starting to think the only real solution is to give both systems their own drive, but it seems like a waste since we're using roughly 500GB of the same stuff. My "dual edting" idea is starting to seem like more of a pain than a benefit.
    Thanks in advance for any help, and please let me know if you have a better idea for our post production setup overall.

    With that much money, you only have two solutions.
    1) Get two drives...put the same footage on both, keeping the exact same file structure. Name both drives the same name so that when you swap projects you don't need to reconnect. Render files you will have to re-create...by rendering. Any new footage you capture onto one will have to be copied onto the other.
    2) Connect one drive to one iMac, connect both iMacs via Ethernet, then enable file sharing and include that drive. This, however, is very unreliable.
    Shared Storage solutions costs thousands to tens of thousands of dollars.
    Shane

  • Having Two Operating Systems on the same computer.

    Is it possible to have two operating system on one computer?
    I would like to have both Mac OSX 10.411 and Mac OSX 10.5 on my Power Mac G4.
    I would like to be able to access each system independently. So that I may use my
    editing software which is 10.411 compatible but not compatible with 10.5. Is this possible?
    Thanks!

    Welcome To  Discussions stevevideo1!
    Yes if you Partition The Hard Drive.
    ali b

  • How many deferent ERP systems could  we connect to one SRM system at the sa

    Hi friends!
    Could you tell me please, how many deferent ERP systems could  we connect to one SRM system at the same time?
    Thanks!

    Hi
    I  worked one srm three backend.  But the relationis 1 to many .  so you can config many backend system.
    What are the problmes you are facing ?
    Regards,
    Satish Gopal

  • Risks of two development groups in the same system

    Hi,
    I need your help.
    I'm looking for a document about the risks having two development groups in the same system.
    The point is: An external party will come soon and start the implementation of a mini H2R in the same system as we (the internal team) are working for SD, MM, CO,... As the developments are cross-client, I'm asked to write a document explaining the risks in such cases like:
    conflicts: working on the same objects
    authorisations: each group should be assigned to different packages
    planning: the go-live should be at the same time
    transports: there can be conflicts on a transport-level
    If you have any documentation that can help me, please let me know.
    Kind regards, Gilles.

    I hope this is not considered a link farm:
    Potential conflicts between already released transports:
    Program to validate transport sequence
    Uwe Schieferstein's blog on "Dangerous Liaisons in User-Exits and How to Avoid Them":
    /people/uwe.schieferstein/blog/2008/11/11/dangerous-liaisons-in-user-exits-and-how-to-avoid-them
    Just two of many things to observe...
    Thomas

  • Two R3 servers have the same logical system name?

    Can two R3 servers have the same logical system name present in the same network? We plan to clone our production server and let the clone reside in the same network. The clone is identical with the production server with the same SID, hostname, logical system name, but different IP address.

    Hi
    Check this  [Link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/da/5990df015b5b43a36f6ce7fa1ee8c0/content.htm]will cleare you doubt
    Regards
    Uday

  • Two Urls for the same portal server

    Hi,
    I have to access the same portal server for the two diffent url links.
    This is required for me to have two different logon pages for the portal for completely different urls.
    Please share your ideas here!
    Ram

    Hi,
    say for example
    your one URL is
    x.hostname:portno/irj/1stURL
    and the second URL is
    x.hostname:portno/irj/2ndURL
    and maintain two umLogonPagedefault.jsp with names,
    umLogonPage1stURL.jsp and umLogonPage2ndURL.jsp and do the necessary coding you want inside the JSPs.
    Now, umLogonPage.JSP is the JSP file responsible for determinig your portal URL to open when user wants to enter into portal. So Open that JSP(umLogonPage.JSP) and do like this:::
    <%
    String strReqURL = request.getRequestURL().toString()==null?"" : request.getRequestURL().toString() ;
    %>
    <%
    if ( strReqURL != null && strReqURL.endsWith("/1stURL"))     
    %>
         <%@ include file="umLogonPage1stURL.jsp"%>
    <%
    else if ( strReqURL != null && strReqURL.endsWith("/2nuURL"))
    %>
    <%@ include file="umLogonPage2ndURL.jsp"%>
    <%
    %>
    Regards,
    Srinivas.

  • PO No range when we ink two SRM system with One ECC system

    Hello Experts,
    We have a client requirement to link Two SRM Systems with One ECC system.
    In this case what number range we need to maintain in both SRM systems for PO.
    -The number range of ECC PO should get update whenver the PO is transferred from any of the two SRM system.
    -We have Extended classic scenario.
    -Also PO Doc type is going to be same.
    Can we handle this by increasing the buffer of the number range in one of the SRM system?
    Any idea...pls help urgently.
    Best Regards,
    Anil
    Edited by: anil.s.verma on Oct 1, 2010 4:33 PM

    Hello Anil,
    Being in Extended Classic Scenario (leading PO being in SRM, R/3 PO number range is concidered as external because PO number is given by SRM), the only solution for you is to:
    1- give same number range interval for PO (internal in SRM system 1 and SRM system 2, external number range in R/3), e.g. 3100000000 - 3199999999
    2- in SRM system 2, fill in current number with (for example) 3159999999 and let empty (or current value) in SRM system 1
    3- assign, in each system for your concerned transaction type, number range as internal in SRM and external in R/3.
    In this way, you will avoid overlaping in R/3 between PO numbers coming from SRM system 1 and SRM system 2
    Regards.
    Laurent.

  • Multiple layouts for the same user in the same portal

    Hello.
    I have a challenge.
    Currently there is a portal (6.40) running as a frontend for an application. So the portal is used for only this purpose. The content is a changed masthead and a number of WebDynpros and UWL's all accessing the same backend.
    Now there is a wish to use the same portal to execute a transaction iView for the same backend. Simple. BUT when a user uses the portal for the product he/she shall not see the transaction iView and also when the user sees the transaction iView, the WDs and UWL's should not be shown in the navigation. And also the masthead should be different on the two views.
    Putting in another portal is not anoption, this should be done on the same portal. The way I expect it to work is by accessing the same portal og two different URL's.
    Companies cannot be used since some of the users should be able to access poth views.
    I know that in a prefect world it would simply be a matter of creating two different roles and assign them as needed and if the user has both roles hen they would both be available in the navigation. But to the user the portal should look like different portals.
    Any suggestions on how to achieve this functionality?
    Br,
    Thomas Mouritsen

    Hi Thomas,
    you have several options with the portal standard:
    1.) If the user only has one role assigned at a time you can attach the portal layout to the roles. So depending on the role the user has he sees the respective layout - BUT: how to asign the two roles to the user!? This can only be done by admins and I assume that it is no intended to call the admins every time the user needs the other role?
    2.) The entry to the portal is realized with different urls like http://yourportal.com/VIEW1 and http://yourportal.com/VIEW2.
    VIEW1 and VIEW2 are so called portal aliases and you can attach the different layouts to those aliases.
    BUT: the two roles have nothing to do with the aliases so you still have the problem of role assignment.
    3.) Each person gets two users with each user assigned to one role and one layout assigned to the user or group or role...
    Anyhow: I would ask the people who brought up the idea of two different layouts - WHY?? A portal is ONE single point of entry for EVERY application and information a user needs. So why two different layouts? And what, if five others are coming each bringing their own layouts, too?
    4.) If you really want to have different layouts each time a different top-level navigation point is active you have to program your own portal component. That would fit your needs but is besides standard.
    Hth,
    Michael

  • Multiple Discovery Systems on the same network

    Is anybody successfully running more than one DS on the same network? We have edited the hostname of the DS but their still seems to be a conflict between the two servers and the SID names cannot be the same as well.

    Hi Phillip,
    The changing of the hostname is not recommended by SAP, but there is a customer who succeeded in doing so and claims to have even connected 4 Discovery Systems to the same network.
    Knowing Maxim, I believe he indeed achieved it.
    Read his blog: /people/maxim.efimov2/blog/2007/05/07/how-to-change-hostname-on-sap-enterprise-soa-discovery-system
    My only tip: make a backup of the systems before you make any significant changes.
    Regards,
    Itai

  • How do I create two iTunes accounts under the same email address?

    I've got my account duplicated -and charged for apps I already own- by using my email address as login instead of apple ID, but I've been told it's my fault so…
    I'm trying to figure out
    *How do I do to create two iTunes accounts under the same email and having different IDs?*
    I mean, two accounts with different purchase history. It doesn't matter if billing address, or credit card are the same (or different) because none of them flag apps as "purchased"
    I tried today from iTunes, but it tells me the email is taken.
    Do you know any way a user can do it from our end? (website, iTunes, iPhone)
    If you've got charged by apps twice, please don't say it here. I don't want my post being deleted again. Thanks.

    Beavis2084:
    Expired .mac accounts HAVE NO EMAIL. You own the id (which iTunes requests to be spelled in form of an email)
    Also, FREE .mac accounts have no email either.
    What you see in the screenshots is what I'm saying:
    There's been a change in the way iTunes wants you to login. The iTunes reps see at their end what you see at the top of the window, which probably is the "migration" of the new login: Old login system, using ID (in form of email for iTunes)
    BELOW you clearly see where says "ID" and both have the email as login.
    (again, that .mac email doesn't exist and NEVER DID)
    That's the NEW login: your EMAIL.
    I'm sorry I didn't explain it better the first time. I wrote about this so many times to iTunes support reps to prevent them to "read" what their system says that I gave it for settled. (not to mention that my first post was removed because "it lacks of interest for others"
    I own an apple ID, given away with the purchase of a new computer (nothing small by the way) and when that happens (and never subscribe for a paid membership), you use ANOTHER email to be related to your account.
    Now that AGAIN apple asks you for using your EMAIL (non-apple in our case) instead of your ID (which you can't use or you will never get a notification again!) the system believes there are two accounts.
    It's like your credit card bank changing the address for sending the payments. You are STILL paying, but getting a higher rate because their CHANGED the address and the check never arrives.
    In this case, signing in with a different string, makes the system believe there are two accounts. And that probably is under the policy which probably states purchases are not charged twice for SAME ID, and SAME iPhone… and you used a different ID, so it must be fair (sarcasm). Who told you to do so? Bad boy!

  • Communication between Two WebLogic instances on the same machine

    Hi,
    We're having a problem with communication between two copies of Weblogic on
    the same machine. They are configured with seperate ports (regular and SSL).
    Independantly, they run fine. I can access EJBs running on either of them.
    The problem is that a bean in one of them has code which attempts to access
    an EJB on the other one. The procude fails when trying to obtain the initial
    context. This same code works if compilied independantly of WebLogic on the
    same machine.
    Are there any known issues regards communication between two running
    instances of Weblogic on the same machine?
    Thanks in advance,
    Randy Yarger
    marchFIRST
    [email protected]

    Thanks for the prompt reply.
    There is one IP address (internal address 10.227.1.34) one the machine. WLS1
    is set up at ports 7001 and 5133. WLS2 is setup at ports 7004 and 7005.
    When WLS1 attempts to obtain a context to WLS2 with the URL
    t3://10.227.1.34:7004/ it pauses for a long period of time. Running truss
    on the both WLS processes shows communication occuring between the two
    followed by long periods of silence. Finally WLS2 spits out the error
    ConnectionException[7001,7001,5133,5133,7001,7001] (paraphrased, I can get
    the entire error if it would help).
    After another long pause, WLS1 quits trying with the error 'Server
    10.227.1.34:7004 not found' (again paraphrased).
    Among the things we've tried:
    * Changing the URL from the IP to 127.0.0.1
    * Enabling/disabling SSL on either or both WLSs.
    * Changing the server name in WLS2's copy of weblogic.properties from
    'myserver' to 'myserver2' (previously they were both 'myserver')
    * Upgrading WLS2 to 5.1.0sp5 (Tried upgrading WLS1, but was getting class
    not found errors and quit because that WLS is being used by other people)
    This is a Solaris server. WLS1 is running 5.1.0 and WLS2 is running 5.1.0sp5
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Best,
    Randy Yarger
    marchFIRST
    [email protected]
    "Michael Girdley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    There should not be. What is your network configuration? Are they on
    separate IP addresses?
    Thanks,
    Michael
    Michael Girdley
    BEA Systems Inc
    "Randy Jay Yarger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    Hi,
    We're having a problem with communication between two copies of Weblogicon
    the same machine. They are configured with seperate ports (regular andSSL).
    Independantly, they run fine. I can access EJBs running on either of
    them.
    The problem is that a bean in one of them has code which attempts toaccess
    an EJB on the other one. The procude fails when trying to obtain theinitial
    context. This same code works if compilied independantly of WebLogic onthe
    same machine.
    Are there any known issues regards communication between two running
    instances of Weblogic on the same machine?
    Thanks in advance,
    Randy Yarger
    marchFIRST
    [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for