Two Stage confirmation

hi  SRM Gurus
We are implementing SRM 4.0 classic scenarios.
we have following process
1 Create a shop cart
2 Create a  Purchase Requisition
3 Create a Purchase Order
4 Central Stores does the first stage goods receipts by keeping the confirmation on Hold.
5  Final requestor confirms the Goods receipts
Now when central stores is posting a goods receipts in help status at item level the partner tab shows only the vendor as a partner and does not bring the employee as a partner.
The central stores has to enter manaully the partner Goods receiptent as employee. Only after that the employee is able to perform the final confirmation.
Can any one guide how to bring the employee BP as goods receiptent by default  during the first stage GR which is done the the central stores.
Regards,
Nimish Sheth

Hi Vadim
For Workflow WS10400002  following are the conditions -
1 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.CompletionStatus& NE  X
2 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.WFL Creator Type& =   R
3 &Gross Amount(INR)&   <  100000
4 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.ApproverList&    EX
5 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.WFL Creator Type&   = R
6 &Gross Amount(INR)&                            >= 1000
7 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.ApproverList&   EX
8 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.WFL Creator Type&  NE R
9 &Gross Amount(INR)&                           <  1000 
10 &EC Confirmation Goods/Services.ApproverList&      EX
Now a I will have to change at following lines
Line  2 and Line  5 -  NE R  instead of = R (Requestor)
Is it that you mean.
kindly suggest
regards,
Nimish Sheth

Similar Messages

  • Two step confirmation with RF device (Mobile Data Entry) - 1st step only

    Hello
    I want to implement the following scenario:
    - WM transfer orders are created, relevant for two step confirmation;
    - a user working with RF device confirms the 1st step - picking;
    - then the materials are transported physically to another building (the same warehouse number);
    - another user working with RF device confirms the 2nd step - putaway.
    For confirming the 1st step I tried to use standard transaction LM07. Confirmation of the 1st step is working fine but right after that a screen for confirming the 2nd step is displayed to the user. I would like this transaction to finish just after confirming the 1st step and not to proceed with the 2nd step immediately - because the confirmation of the 2nd step should be done by another user (with some other transaction).
    What is more: if you exit the transaction manually after confirming the 1st step the system saves the TO number (in table LRF_WKQU) and in some circumstances triggers the screen for confirming the 2nd step even if you do not run LM07 - this is so called "recovery" function which is a nuisance in my case.
    So my question is: is there a way to customize LM07 so that it finished processing automatically right after confirming the 1st step for a two step confirmation TO ? (and without storing data for "recovery" function). Or maybe some other mobile-data-entry transaction should be used for that ?
    regards

    Hi Vlad,
    One more information, which i would like to communicate on this issue.
    We have raised OSS message to SAP on this issue. They have replied back that, on screen 1302, we have some custom code which is interfering with the system behavior.
    As of now, we have analyzed at our end, and we found that, the enhancement at screen 1302 is restricted for the functionality, and in theory, this enhancement should not be effecting at all the system behavior.
    SAP has suggested to test the scenario , without any enhancement on screen 1302.
    Still we are in discussion with SAP, and try to find out the resolution.
    Can you also check in your system, if you have any enhancement on screen 1302 ? And if yes, does it interfering with the stander SAP codes.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raj.

  • Two step confirmation for warehouse tasks in EWM

    Hello everybody,
    I am working on an internal prototyp to evaluate SAP EWM. Therefore it is essential that we use "two step confirmation" for warehouse tasks. Step one: confirm pick up of a pallet; Step two: confirm transportation of a pallet. Like it is used in SAP WM (Parameter I_QUKNZ in function module L_TO_CONFIRM and in standard SAP).
    I haven't found anything similar to that in EWM so far. I searched in the official EWM SAP Press book and also in google. But right no I don't have any idea.
    Do you guys have any hints on how to achieve two step confirmation somehow?
    Many thanks in advance!
    Stef

    Hi Jürgen.
    Thanks for your input! You are right, it works with RF!
    But it works kind of strange. Deleting source storage bin, creating another position etc.
    I will have a look how to adapt this.
    Thanks!

  • Two step confirmation in Warehouse

    Hi All,
    Two step confirmation (We can use this indicator to define whether confirmation of the withdrawal of materials from a storage bin and arrival of materials at the target storage bin is allowed in the warehouse in two steps) indicator has been set for my warehouse.
    As the two step confirmation is becoming heavy for the warehouse team, that need to be changed as a single step confirmation.
    Will there be any impact on open TOs if i change this from two step to single step confirmation. Will there be any other impacts on warehouse environment.
    Rgds
    Raul

    My suspicion would be that the configuration settings are referenced during TO creation and that TOs are then 'locked' with these settings.  So the impact would not be significant, all existing TOs, just created or part processed would need to be completed using 2-step and that new ones would be single step.
    Why not just trial it in your development system. Possibly all TOs just become single confirmation and the pick confirmation for existing TOs, where that has happened, becomes irrelevant.
    Regards,
    Nick
    Edited by: Nick Whitehurst on May 21, 2010 3:30 PM

  • Two-step confirmation of Transfer order in WM

    Hi
    We are confirguring 2 step confirmation.
    We have activated 2step conf, for the warehouse & marked corfirmation mandatory for the storage types,
    However we are not able to perform confirmation for Pick & Transfer step.
    Please let us know  on how to configure two step confirmation.
    Thanks,

    Hello Abhay Desai,
    Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
    http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
      --> SAP ERP Central Component
           --> Logistics
                --> Logistic Execution
                     --> Warehouse Management System
                          --> Goods Issue
                               --> Two Step Picking.
    Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back.

  • WM - Two step confirmation cancellation

    Hi Gurus,
    I am using the two step confirmation for transfer order in one of my business process (no 2 step picking).
    This is a necessary requirement from my client, but I have a little issue with the cancellation. Once the first step is confirmed, all the cancellation transactions issue the error message #L3355.
    Physically, the forklift driver should be able to confirm the first step of picking, and also to cancel this first step. However, there seems not to be a standard transaction to cover this "normal" requirement.
    Does anyone has an idea on how this process could be carried out in the system ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best Regards,
    Remi

    If you check the code in...
    include: ML03TF90_STORNO_PRUEFEN
    form: STORNO_PRUEFEN
    ...you will see that this is the standard behaviour of the system. SAP online help also says:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f83e744afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    If a transfer order has already been confirmed, the only way to change a goods movement to restore the original stock situation is to create a new transfer order.
    So, in standard system you have to create a new TO or you have to go to development / modification of standard code.
    (one )
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Apr 6, 2011 6:35 PM

  • TO two step confirmation - return transfers

    Hello,
    I have set two step confirmation for OT and everything seems ok. I used LT1D for the picking confirmation and LT1E for positioning confirmation. The problems is when in the OT there is a return transfer to a storage type. For example
    200 picked from strorage type A
    100 positioned in storage type B
    100 positioned in storage type R
    R is the return storage type (set in customizing for the A storage type in picking strategy section)
    In this case the two step confirmation doesn't work. SAP gives the message that two step confirmation is not allowed. I can only confirm with LT12 that is in a single step.
    I haven't found any SAP notes for this topic, can someone help me please?
    Thank you very much.
    Bye Bye,
    Andrea

    Hi Vlad,
    One more information, which i would like to communicate on this issue.
    We have raised OSS message to SAP on this issue. They have replied back that, on screen 1302, we have some custom code which is interfering with the system behavior.
    As of now, we have analyzed at our end, and we found that, the enhancement at screen 1302 is restricted for the functionality, and in theory, this enhancement should not be effecting at all the system behavior.
    SAP has suggested to test the scenario , without any enhancement on screen 1302.
    Still we are in discussion with SAP, and try to find out the resolution.
    Can you also check in your system, if you have any enhancement on screen 1302 ? And if yes, does it interfering with the stander SAP codes.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Raj.

  • LT45 (Picking Progress) and Two Step Confirmation

    Dear all,
    I have Two Step confirmation in place for one WM movement type and I am happy with it.
    We also use Multiple Processing for Deliveries. As a result, the Groups created by this process are used to monitor the Picking Progress in LT45
    In LT22 or LT24 there is clear distinction between Open TO's, Confirmed TO's and half Conirmed TO's (yellow triangle.
    Much to my disappointment I cannot see such a distinction in LT45.
    Is there a way or another Monitor available that does show me the different statusses? A yellow bar if the group is half confirmed is too much to ask, but an alternative would be nice.
    Thanks!
    Sandeep

    Ananthram,
    Thanks for reading my Question.
    I am talking about TO's that use Two-step Confirmation. In LT22 / LT24 they show as Yellow Triangle, as you know this means half confirmed.
    As you know in LL01 they don't show as yellow but as red, just like in LT45. So this is very misleading.
    Can you tell me a place where I can clearly monitor my Picking Progress and see a distinction between Green, Yellow and Red
    (Confirmed, Half confirmed, Open)
    Thanks again for taking the time.
    Sandeep

  • LE-TRM: Two-step confirmation

    Dear all,
    Could you please provide a link to a SAP documentation which stipulates that Two-step confirmation settings (SPRO > Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Activities > Confirmation > Confirmation control for Warehouse number / Storage type / Movement type) are mandatory in order to have TRM tasks created?
    Thx a lot in advance

    Hi Sandeepan,
    Can you please check the two settings in tcode OMLX (Path:IMG u2192 Logistics Execution u2192 Warehouse Management u2192 Activities u2192Confirmation) The first of these is the requirement to confirm the pick and placement of a transfer order separately and the second is the requirement to confirm placement and removal of stock into and out of a storage type. For the second setting, by default, the requirement to confirm is switched off in interim storage types.
    Other than above setting you need to check which mode is considered to find the rout till destination bin of the TO.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Sudhir

  • Two step confirmation

    Hi All
    Do we have any thing like two step confirmation in Warehouse Management.
    Thanking you
    With Rgds
    Vinod

    Yes it's a terminology where the stock removal and putaway requires two separate confirmation. You can have a look in T-code OMLX and click on Mvt Type button for more info.
    Amit

  • Joining 18 tables -- one at a time or in two stages ?? best one..??

    I have to join 18 tables,.. Is it best to join all 18 in a single shot or to go with
    multi stages-- 9 tables in one stage and after that anotther 9 tables..
    Please anyone give me a good suggestion on this with some reason...
    Thanks in advance

    If you can look at your query and recognise that it is trying to collect (say) two small result sets and then join the result sets, then it is actually a good idea to express the query in that fashion to Oracle.
    Take for example a query that sums last week's profits for a supermarket by department using a 9 table query in about 2 minutes. A similar query reports the previous week's profits with a marginally different query in about two minutes. You write the two queries as inline views and join them to report the percentage change in profit by department - and the query takes 4 hours because Oracle has used "complex view merging" to turn your two 9-table queries into a single 18-table query.
    In this case, a workaround is to use the /*+ no_merge */ hint. In outline, something like:
    select     {columns}
    from
         select /*+ no_merge */
              dept_no,
              etc.
         from     ...
         )     lw,
         select /*+ no_merge */
              dept_no,
              etc.
         from     ...
         )     pw
    where
         pw.dept_no = lw.dept_no
    ;In less obvious cases you may still be able to find that you can break up a big query into a few smaller, logical sections, and use this technique to generate and join what are, in effect, intermediate results.
    An alternative to the /*+ no_merge */ hint is to use subquery factoring to the same end. There's a more complex example of the method here: http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2007/07/01/internet-sql/
    In either case, avoid turning your 18-table query into 18 separate pieces and sticking them back together - it may make the optimizer do some very silly things. Karen Morton mentions an example of this on her blog: http://karenmorton.blogspot.com/2008/06/dont-do-work-you-dont-have-to-do.html
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
    "The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
    it is the illusion of knowledge." (Stephen Hawking)

  • One project published with two stage sizes and shapes?

    I’ve got one project that must be deployed in two different size & shape layouts, online running in a 760 x 700 box (almost square) and also on a wide screen kiosk running 1120 x 700 (wide rectangular). Maintaining two separate layouts has been time consuming and thus costly.
    The compromise solution is to design a 1120 x 700 layout with the core functional elements placed on the right side of the stage, branding, supporting data, and eye candy filling the left. The idea is to crop the stage in the online version showing only the right most 760 x 700 content (all the core elements) while showing the complete stage for the kiosk. Branding for the online version is provided by the html container.  I know how to use masks and edit the html to show only the left side of the stage but I’m not sure how to show only the right side of the stage since moving the mask does not change the (0,0) point of the stage.

    As well as the reply from Anish about using your program on 2 computers, you need to ask in the program forum for how to best use the programs to do what you want
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere_elements/content
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/content

  • Two Step Confirmation Transfer Order with Radiofrquency

    Friends & Gurus.
    Can I use 2 step confirmation with RF? Which transaction should I use? I can do it with regular SAP transactions, but as soon as I do it with RF transactions both Pick and Transfer are confirmed.
    Thanks.
    Solved, yes you can.
    Edited by: albertiosis on Oct 3, 2008 2:48 PM

    Hello Abhay Desai,
    Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
    http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
      --> SAP ERP Central Component
           --> Logistics
                --> Logistic Execution
                     --> Warehouse Management System
                          --> Goods Issue
                               --> Two Step Picking.
    Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back.

  • TRM two step confirmation

    Hi
    I am new to TRM and have run into the following problem.
    I have configured the Site and the WH and am performing System guided Putaway (PTWY_SG). As required in WM for the source and destination storage type i have maintained separate confirmation.
    After the Transfer order is created, as expected it shows up in the TRM monitor. From the monitor i have created the task for the TO. Once i login via the RF device the task shows up and i execute force confirmation for the same.
    Now the situation is that the TO is confirmed partially (the pick step  of the 2 step confirmation is processed but the putaway step is not performed). However as i login i cannot see any other task to execute the second step.
    If i check the TRM monitor there is only the task which i have forced confirmed. Now how to execute the second step so that the TO is fully confirmed.
    Can some one help me with the std process to go ahead with the same.
    Sandeepan

    Hi Sandeepan,
    Can you please check the two settings in tcode OMLX (Path:IMG u2192 Logistics Execution u2192 Warehouse Management u2192 Activities u2192Confirmation) The first of these is the requirement to confirm the pick and placement of a transfer order separately and the second is the requirement to confirm placement and removal of stock into and out of a storage type. For the second setting, by default, the requirement to confirm is switched off in interim storage types.
    Other than above setting you need to check which mode is considered to find the rout till destination bin of the TO.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Sudhir

  • Sharepoint 2010 two stage dynamic approval

    I have an infopath form that needs to be first routed to a selected reviewer and then that reviewer selects approvers from a picklist. This looks like the Staged OOTB approval process, but how do I dynamically change the approvers in the 2nd stage. The WF
    needs to wait for the reviewer to select reviewer (in parallel). I'm looking for a no code solution if possible.

    Hi,
    In the infopath form add a field and from SharePoint Designer creates workflow and use this field for directing to approver
    the values for this field can be retrieved from another list that contains unique values for the users and their data
    and from workflow you can direct the next approval based on selection in the form
    in the infopath form you can control to show hide the field based on certain values and you can change that from the designer workflow.
    Kind Regards, John Naguib Technical Consultant/Architect MCITP, MCPD, MCTS, MCT, TOGAF 9 Foundation

Maybe you are looking for

  • Errors with USMT 4 Loadstate on some machines. Win 7 OSD

    In my test lab my Win 7 OSD is working fine restoring user data with USMT hardlinking. As I started to test it on real machines in our test lab with real user profiles and data I started to see failures on some machines on the USMT data restore step.

  • Handling DatabaseException, OperationStatus.KEYEXIST, from  Secondary Db

    Hi, If I insert a record into my primary db I might do something like: OperationStatus status = db.put(null, key, data); if (OperationStatus.SUCCESS != status) { // handle                     However, if I have a also have a secondary database, and i

  • What would you most like to see in a future version?

    I'm pretty sure the DSC development team looks at these posts so what would you most like to see in the future? For me, I'd like to be able to dynamically add tags without shutting down the engine. Regards, Robert

  • SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment 7.2

    Hi, Please some one tell me what is SAP NetWeaver Composition Environment 7.2 Trial Version? is BI also part of the netweaver? Thanks

  • Python - got dict, would rather object or list

    Hey, I've done PHP before and I like arrays, they're nice and to me, very easy to work with. Python, veeerrryyyy different. I'm slowly getting the hang of it but I want to do some changing here, I'm using a dictionary at the moment but in another sec